BETA


2005/2096(DEC) 2004 discharge: EC general budget, Committee of the Regions

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT LUNDGREN Nils (icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 100

Events

2006/12/06
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Committee of the Regions for the 2004 financial year.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2006/815/EC of the European Parliament on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004 (Section VII - Committee of the Regions).

CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004.

This decision is in line with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 27 April 2006 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27/04/2006).

2006/05/11
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/04/27
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/04/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) and granted the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004. In its accompanying statements, Parliament noted that in 2004 the Committee of the Regions (CoR) administered a budget of EUR 59 413 031 with a utilisation rate of 83.57 %. Parliament underlined that the CoR appeared in the Court of Auditors' annual report to be the institution with the highest number of criticisms of all the other institutions. It criticised the fact that the internal audit function was carried out by a temporary member of staff employed on the basis of renewable contracts of short duration, but welcomed the solution now found. Parliament noted that according to the information given at the hearing of the other institutions organised by the Committee on Budgetary Control on 25 January 2006 certain matters are now the subject of an investigation by OLAF. In addition, the CoR trade unions contested the CoR's recent reorganisation exercise, which has been carried out despite some controversy as already pointed out in previous discharge resolutions.

Parliament found it regrettable that the Court of Auditors was unable to take account of the CoR's annual activity report as it had not been produced before the Court's audit was concluded.

With regard to buildings, Parliament felt that there should also be an audit of the Montoyer renovation. It noted that at the time Parliament recommended purchase, but now pointed to the fact that renting buildings would significantly reduce the risks involved for small institutions and that this solution should be considered as a serious alternative for future building projects.

Parliament noted that while the authorising officer by delegation did not enter any formal reservations in his statement of assurance, he did annex to it a number of remarks, including the fact that due to weaknesses in the new payroll application (NAP) managed by the Commission, the sub-delegated authorising officers and their ex-ante verifiers were unable to guarantee the accuracy of all staff salary calculations. It acknowledged that weaknesses in the NAP were a problem for all institutions and not a specific problem for the CoR.

Parliament went on to state that the CoR should have focused on the importance of setting up a fully functioning internal audit service in 2004, knowing the challenges resulting from enlargement. It noted the following as particular challenges: a substantial increase in the budget in 2004 (up 50 %); growth in staff numbers (up 63 %); the arrival of new members (up 43 %); the financial and regulatory impact of the new Staff Regulations; and the continuing implementation of the new Financial Regulation, together with the move of most of the CoR's services to the new buildings (Belliard 99-101 and Belliard 68), which took place in June 2004.

Finally, Parliament recalled that, in relation to OLAF's findings, the public prosecutor at the Brussels Court of Appeal concluded in March 2005 that there was insufficient evidence to bring a prosecution and therefore decided to close the file without further action. Parliament demanded nevertheless, given the lack of follow-up in 2004 to the OLAF report on fraud and irregularities at the CoR, that the CoR abolish the imprest account system for the reimbursement of members' travel expenses and adopt the same system as the EESC.

Documents
2006/04/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/04/26
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/03/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/03/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/03/21
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the report by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) proposing that discharge be granted to the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2004. In its accompanying comments, the committee noted that, in the Court of Auditors' Annual Report, the CoR appeared to be "the institution with the highest number of criticisms of all the other institutions". It deplored the fact that the internal audit function was carried out by a member of temporary staff on short-term renewable contracts, and said that the CoR should have focused on setting up a fully functioning internal audit service in 2004, knowing the challenges resulting from enlargement. However, it welcomed the solution now found. MEPs also found it regrettable that the Court of Auditors was unable to take account of the CoR's annual activity report, as this had not been produced before the Court's audit was concluded.

On the CoR's buildings policy, the committee concluded that renting buildings would significantly reduce the risks involved for small institutions and that "this solution should be considered as a serious alternative for future building projects".

Lastly, the report noted that during 2004 the CoR had amended its rules on the refunding of travel expenses and the payment of travel and meeting allowances for its Members. However, given the lack of follow-up in 2004 to the OLAF report on fraud and irregularities at the CoR, MEPs demanded that the CoR abolish the imprest account system for the reimbursement of Members' travel expenses and adopt the same system as the European Economic and Social Committee.

2006/02/28
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/02/23
   CSL - Supplementary non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Council recommendation on the discharge to be given to the other institutions in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2004.

CONTENT : having regard to the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council calls on the European Parliament to give a discharge to all of the other EU institutions (other than the Commission).

If overall the observations made by the Council are positive as regards expenditure, the Council believes that the implementation of the budget calls for a series of comments on the discharge which should be followed up.

The Council welcomes the fact that the errors identified by the Court did not materially affect the legality and regularity of administrative expenditure as a whole.

It notes with satisfaction the efforts and the progress made by the Institutions to adapt their supervisory systems and controls to the new Financial Regulation, but underlines that they have not fully implemented the Internal Control Standards.

The Council takes note that the 2004 financial year has introduced specific risks resulting from the adoption of the new staff regulations, the introduction of a new system for calculating staff remuneration and the implementation of the new system in the framework of the new Financial Regulation at the same time.

In this context, the Council shares the Court's view that particular attention should be paid to the various technical weaknesses detected in the implementation of the NAP (new payroll system), to an accurate application of the staff regulations in respect of travel allowances, to the improvement of the control systems concerning the transfer of part of the staff.

Documents
2006/02/03
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/11/30
   CofA - Court of Auditors: opinion, report
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Court of Auditors’ report on the implementation of the 2004 budget (other institutions – Committee of the Regions).

CONTENT : in its 28 th Annual Report on the implementation of the general budget of the European Union, the Court states that overall improvements have been made by all the institutions in order to adapt their supervisory and control systems to the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, the risks identified in 2003 linked to the implementation of the Financial Regulation, together with the risks resulting from the introduction of new Staff Regulations and computerised systems for calculating salaries and pensions have not been adequately addressed by the supervisory and control systems in 2004.

Despite the progress made by the Commission in reforming its internal control system and the positive impact on the legality and regularity of the Commission’s internal management of expenditure (DAS), further progress is still required in terms of operational effectiveness. The report states that the past audits by the Court showed that the errors found were mostly of a formal nature and not due to serious weaknesses in the control systems.

Supervisory and control systems : in 2004 all the institutions continued improving their supervisory and control systems in order to comply with the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, none of the institutions had fully implemented Internal Control Standards (ICS). In parallel, the NAP (‘Nouvelle Application Paie’), a new computer application for calculating staff remuneration created and managed by the Commission Paymaster Office (PMO), was used by all the institutions. The NAP presented in 2004 various technical weaknesses, which created a new risk and, in many cases, resulted in the erroneous calculation of various elements of staff remuneration. The most evident errors were corrected manually before payment. Concerning one of those elements, in March 2005 NAP programmes were amended, the amounts paid in 2004 recalculated and, where necessary, corrected. These corrections led to recoveries amounting, for all the institutions, to a total of around EUR 1,9 million. Manual data transferred into the NAP from the computer systems recording the situations qualifying the staff for specific entitlements constituted a further specific risk of errors. However, controls were not reinforced accordingly.

A lack of control procedures concerning pension payments were noted in some institutions.

Lastly, except for the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, occasional weaknesses were observed in the supervisory and control systems concerning procurement.

Annual activity reports and declarations of the Directors-General : in 2004, improvements were made to the annual activity reports and the declarations of the Directors-General. However, weaknesses were found in the control systems.

Specific observations on the Committee of the Regions (CoR) : the report indicates that the expenditure of the institution was EUR 63 million (against EUR 43 million in 2003).

As regards the implementation of the CoR’s budget, the Court states that the main weaknesses concern:

the application of a flat-rate sum, ranging from 30 % to 60 % of the maximum allowable amount, to staff who do not produce any evidence of having incurred accommodation costs; transfer of part of the salary with weighting coefficients granted without the necessary justification; procurement procedures.

The Court notes further weaknesses in the implementation of internal control standards. They were approved only in November 2004, but not all the measures needed to achieve full compliance with them were taken. The internal audit function was carried out by a member of temporary staff, employed on the basis of renewable contracts of short duration. In May 2005 an official was nominated internal auditor.

General conclusions : in conclusion, the Court considers, as a result of its audit, and in order to address the risks identified, that improvements should be made in the supervisory and control systems relating to the following areas: documentation of procedures; definition of the nature of the supporting documents which should make it possible to check that the expenditure is in accordance with the terms of the contracts or of the regulations and rules; grading of staff under the new staff regulations; remuneration, in particular payment of allowances and transfers of part of the staff emoluments with the application of a weighting coefficient.

2005/11/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/10/07
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : presentation of the final annual accounts of the European Community for the financial year 2004 – Other institutions : Section VII – Committee of the Regions.

CONTENT : this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2004 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The available appropriations set out in the Committee’s 2004 budget amounted to EUR 59,6 million (taking account of a supplementary and amending budget of EUR 600.000), with a 83,6% utilisation rate.

Main axes of 2004 expenditure : the budget implementation can be characterised as follows :

Effects of the enlargement process : 95 new Members and 10 new Member State delegations; The consolidation of the institutional role of the CoR; The implementation of complementary actions aiming to enhance the CoR’s profile.

It should also be noted that the budget has been increased for the Committee’s 4 political groups (PES, EPP, ALDE and UEN-EA) in particular for their meetings, activities and publications.

Among the main activities in 2004, one notes in particular:

the strengthening of its consultative activities (5 plenary session with a total of 55 opinions), the participation of Members at conferences/seminars throughout Europe, including one in Berlin on the Constitution as well as the organisation of various events; the implementation of a new communication policy : improving interinstitutional relations, improving the CoR’s profile, promoting its consultative activities (press releases, information notes, the conception of a new website); the strengthening the Institution’s “ greffe” service which aims to assist the members and national delegations in their daily tasks and to help ease the workload relating to enlargement.

The main issues of the 2004 budget implementation can be summarised as follows:

Title I (Staff costs) : this budget item shows the effects of the enlargement process. The institution’s budget, and in particular DG Administration, was nearly doubled to deal with the arrival of the new Members (+ 43% compared to 2003). 156 new posts were established which meant that there was roughly a 63% increase in staff.

In comparison to the proposed initial budget, the main items which were subject to an under-utilisation were as follows:

Members’ costs and allowances : travel expenses, various allowances, language classes, Payment of staff in activity and other recruitment costs : 60 “enlargement” positions still have to be filled out of the 156, Staff mission costs, Free lance interpreters fees (cancellation of numerous meetings,…).

It should be added that the annual report presents a table showing the participation rate of the Members and the substitutes at the plenary sessions: over 2004, the average participation rate reached 77%.

Title II (Operational expenditure) : this heading was characterised by the following :

Building projects in 2004: the change of address of the CoR and the ESC. The initial budget was respected; New requirements following the enlargement process: the requirements are estimated at 15.000m² for the 2 Committees. These costs are divided between 3 new buildings : “Belliard 68”, “Trèves 74” and a third building. These buildings will not be available at the same time : only Belliard I and II and Belliard 68 were ready in 2004. Trèves 74 should be finished in 2006. It should be noted that the contract for the former CoR building (Ravenstein) was terminated mid-2004.

In addition, the following should be noted:

the carry over of a budget line to 2005 for the creation of a “Interinstitutional Library” in Brussels for the sum of EUR 30.473; advanced payment of appropriations in order to reduce the budgetary pressure under heading 5 of the financial perspectives : advanced payments in 2004 of ground rent for the “Belliard I” and “Trèves 74” building for a sum of roughly EUR 2,3 million; an under-utilisation of appropriations relating to building security issues, meeting and conference costs, technical material and transport costs (call for tender for the rental of cars carried over to 2005) and other running costs (newspaper subscriptions, telephone, press conferences).

DETAILED SYNTHESIS OF 2004 EXPENDITURE : this detailed synthesis analyses the breakdown of the Committee of the Regions expenditure for the financial year 2004. The figures mentioned can also be found in the “Final annual accounts of the European Communities - Financial year 2004 – Volume III”.

Implementation rate in 2004 :

Appropriations available for 2004 : EUR 59.413.031 (with an interinstitutional amending budget of EUR 600.000 to fund the correction of increased salaries); Appropriations committed amounted to EUR de 49.654.384, an 83,57% utilisation rate; Appropriations paid amounted to EUR 44.072.451; Appropriations carried over from 2003 to 2004 : EUR 5.061.468,05.

Main budget items and the use of commitment appropriations (Titles I and II):

I : Institutional costs (Members and active staff) : EUR 30,9 million; II : Operational costs (buildings and materials) : EUR 18,8 million.

Documents
2005/10/06
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : presentation of the final annual accounts of the European Community for the financial year 2004 – Other institutions : Section VII – Committee of the Regions.

CONTENT : this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2004 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The available appropriations set out in the Committee’s 2004 budget amounted to EUR 59,6 million (taking account of a supplementary and amending budget of EUR 600.000), with a 83,6% utilisation rate.

Main axes of 2004 expenditure : the budget implementation can be characterised as follows :

Effects of the enlargement process : 95 new Members and 10 new Member State delegations; The consolidation of the institutional role of the CoR; The implementation of complementary actions aiming to enhance the CoR’s profile.

It should also be noted that the budget has been increased for the Committee’s 4 political groups (PES, EPP, ALDE and UEN-EA) in particular for their meetings, activities and publications.

Among the main activities in 2004, one notes in particular:

the strengthening of its consultative activities (5 plenary session with a total of 55 opinions), the participation of Members at conferences/seminars throughout Europe, including one in Berlin on the Constitution as well as the organisation of various events; the implementation of a new communication policy : improving interinstitutional relations, improving the CoR’s profile, promoting its consultative activities (press releases, information notes, the conception of a new website); the strengthening the Institution’s “ greffe” service which aims to assist the members and national delegations in their daily tasks and to help ease the workload relating to enlargement.

The main issues of the 2004 budget implementation can be summarised as follows:

Title I (Staff costs) : this budget item shows the effects of the enlargement process. The institution’s budget, and in particular DG Administration, was nearly doubled to deal with the arrival of the new Members (+ 43% compared to 2003). 156 new posts were established which meant that there was roughly a 63% increase in staff.

In comparison to the proposed initial budget, the main items which were subject to an under-utilisation were as follows:

Members’ costs and allowances : travel expenses, various allowances, language classes, Payment of staff in activity and other recruitment costs : 60 “enlargement” positions still have to be filled out of the 156, Staff mission costs, Free lance interpreters fees (cancellation of numerous meetings,…).

It should be added that the annual report presents a table showing the participation rate of the Members and the substitutes at the plenary sessions: over 2004, the average participation rate reached 77%.

Title II (Operational expenditure) : this heading was characterised by the following :

Building projects in 2004: the change of address of the CoR and the ESC. The initial budget was respected; New requirements following the enlargement process: the requirements are estimated at 15.000m² for the 2 Committees. These costs are divided between 3 new buildings : “Belliard 68”, “Trèves 74” and a third building. These buildings will not be available at the same time : only Belliard I and II and Belliard 68 were ready in 2004. Trèves 74 should be finished in 2006. It should be noted that the contract for the former CoR building (Ravenstein) was terminated mid-2004.

In addition, the following should be noted:

the carry over of a budget line to 2005 for the creation of a “Interinstitutional Library” in Brussels for the sum of EUR 30.473; advanced payment of appropriations in order to reduce the budgetary pressure under heading 5 of the financial perspectives : advanced payments in 2004 of ground rent for the “Belliard I” and “Trèves 74” building for a sum of roughly EUR 2,3 million; an under-utilisation of appropriations relating to building security issues, meeting and conference costs, technical material and transport costs (call for tender for the rental of cars carried over to 2005) and other running costs (newspaper subscriptions, telephone, press conferences).

DETAILED SYNTHESIS OF 2004 EXPENDITURE : this detailed synthesis analyses the breakdown of the Committee of the Regions expenditure for the financial year 2004. The figures mentioned can also be found in the “Final annual accounts of the European Communities - Financial year 2004 – Volume III”.

Implementation rate in 2004 :

Appropriations available for 2004 : EUR 59.413.031 (with an interinstitutional amending budget of EUR 600.000 to fund the correction of increased salaries); Appropriations committed amounted to EUR de 49.654.384, an 83,57% utilisation rate; Appropriations paid amounted to EUR 44.072.451; Appropriations carried over from 2003 to 2004 : EUR 5.061.468,05.

Main budget items and the use of commitment appropriations (Titles I and II):

I : Institutional costs (Members and active staff) : EUR 30,9 million; II : Operational costs (buildings and materials) : EUR 18,8 million.

Documents
2005/04/20
   EP - LUNDGREN Nils (IND/DEM) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

Votes

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - décision #

2006/04/27 Outcome: +: 400, -: 190, 0: 18
DE ES PL FR IT PT EL CZ HU SK AT IE MT SI CY BE LU EE SE FI DK LT LV NL GB
Total
87
44
48
61
43
21
20
22
18
12
17
10
5
6
5
22
6
6
18
10
12
12
8
25
70
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (1)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2
icon: PSE PSE
173

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31
5

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
24

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

3

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: UEN UEN
19

Italy UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

France IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - am. 2 #

2006/04/27 Outcome: -: 431, +: 157, 0: 13
GB CZ MT CY FI SI LV DK EE LU NL PT SE IE BE SK AT LT EL HU IT PL ES FR DE
Total
69
19
5
5
10
6
8
12
6
6
25
20
18
10
22
12
17
12
19
18
42
49
44
62
85
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

4

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: UEN UEN
20

Latvia UEN

For (1)

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Italy UEN

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
172

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

3

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
225

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2
4

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - am. 3 #

2006/04/27 Outcome: -: 380, +: 204, 0: 16
GB CZ LT FI NL CY DK LV EE LU SE BE SI MT AT IE SK HU PT IT EL PL FR ES DE
Total
67
22
12
10
25
5
12
8
6
6
18
22
6
5
17
10
12
18
19
42
20
48
59
44
87
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Finland ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
25

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
19

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

For (1)

3

Ireland UEN

3

Italy UEN

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2
icon: PSE PSE
171

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

3

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - am. 4 #

2006/04/27 Outcome: -: 377, +: 209, 0: 12
GB CZ LT NL CY LV DK FI EE SE BE LU MT SI AT IE SK IT PL HU PT EL FR ES DE
Total
69
22
12
25
5
8
12
10
6
18
22
5
4
6
17
10
12
41
46
18
20
20
61
43
86
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

For (1)

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
17

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Italy UEN

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4
icon: PSE PSE
172

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

For (1)

3

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - am. 5 #

2006/04/27 Outcome: -: 362, +: 228, 0: 14
GB NL CZ LT LV PL FI CY DK EE LU IE SE BE SI MT AT IT SK HU PT EL FR ES DE
Total
67
25
22
12
8
49
10
5
12
6
6
10
18
22
6
5
17
41
12
18
21
20
62
44
86
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1
2

Spain ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
19

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Italy UEN

2
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

Slovakia NI

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3
4

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2
icon: PSE PSE
174

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - am. 1 #

2006/04/27 Outcome: -: 441, +: 148, 0: 14
GB CZ NL CY LV LU MT FI SI EE AT SE DK IE LT SK BE PT EL HU IT PL FR ES DE
Total
69
22
25
5
8
6
5
10
6
6
17
18
12
10
12
12
22
20
20
18
40
49
62
43
86
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
28

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Italy IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
23

United Kingdom NI

4

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

Slovakia NI

For (1)

1

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
19

Latvia UEN

For (1)

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Italy UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Hungary ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
171

Czechia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Rapport Lundgren A6-0115/2006 - résolution #

2006/04/27 Outcome: +: 417, -: 167, 0: 22
DE ES FR IT PT EL HU SK AT BE IE PL MT NL SI LU CY CZ SE EE FI LV DK LT GB
Total
87
44
61
39
21
20
18
12
17
22
10
50
5
25
6
6
5
22
18
6
9
8
11
12
72
icon: PSE PSE
174

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
228

Ireland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
35

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Italy UEN

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia UEN

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: NI NI
23

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Belgium NI

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

France IND/DEM

2

Italy IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Spain ALDE

Against (1)

1

Italy ALDE

For (1)

4

Hungary ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Finland ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-11-30T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/0
date
2005-10-07T00:00:00
docs
title: N6-0027/2005
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2005-11-30T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Court of Auditors: opinion, report
body
CofA
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:SOM:EN:HTML
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:TOC
events/0/date
Old
2005-10-07T00:00:00
New
2005-10-06T00:00:00
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.890
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE369.890
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE370.136
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE370.136
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0115_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0115_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4600&j=0&l=en
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2006-03-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0115_EN.html title: A6-0115/2006
events/3
date
2006-03-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0115_EN.html title: A6-0115/2006
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE
events/6
date
2006-04-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0163_EN.html title: T6-0163/2006
summary
events/6
date
2006-04-27T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0163_EN.html title: T6-0163/2006
summary
events/8
date
2006-12-06T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
events/8
date
2006-12-06T00:00:00
type
Final act published in Official Journal
summary
docs
procedure/final/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-15-06B0_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-15-06B0_EN.html
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 100
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 94
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2005-04-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-115&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0115_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-115&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0115_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-163
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0163_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-815&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-15-06B0_EN.html
procedure/final/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-815&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-2-15-06B0_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-10-07T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N6-0027/2005 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-115&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0115/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4600&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-163 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0163/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-12-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-815&language=EN title: Budget 2006/815 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ L 340 06.12.2006, p. 0043-0043
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2005-04-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LUNDGREN Nils group: Independence and democracy abbr: IND/DEM
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2005-04-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2005-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:C:2005:301:TOC title: OJ C 301 30.11.2005, p. 0001 title: N6-0038/2005 summary: PURPOSE : to present the Court of Auditors’ report on the implementation of the 2004 budget (other institutions – Committee of the Regions). CONTENT : in its 28 th Annual Report on the implementation of the general budget of the European Union, the Court states that overall improvements have been made by all the institutions in order to adapt their supervisory and control systems to the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, the risks identified in 2003 linked to the implementation of the Financial Regulation, together with the risks resulting from the introduction of new Staff Regulations and computerised systems for calculating salaries and pensions have not been adequately addressed by the supervisory and control systems in 2004. Despite the progress made by the Commission in reforming its internal control system and the positive impact on the legality and regularity of the Commission’s internal management of expenditure (DAS), further progress is still required in terms of operational effectiveness. The report states that the past audits by the Court showed that the errors found were mostly of a formal nature and not due to serious weaknesses in the control systems. Supervisory and control systems : in 2004 all the institutions continued improving their supervisory and control systems in order to comply with the requirements of the new Financial Regulation. However, none of the institutions had fully implemented Internal Control Standards (ICS). In parallel, the NAP (‘Nouvelle Application Paie’), a new computer application for calculating staff remuneration created and managed by the Commission Paymaster Office (PMO), was used by all the institutions. The NAP presented in 2004 various technical weaknesses, which created a new risk and, in many cases, resulted in the erroneous calculation of various elements of staff remuneration. The most evident errors were corrected manually before payment. Concerning one of those elements, in March 2005 NAP programmes were amended, the amounts paid in 2004 recalculated and, where necessary, corrected. These corrections led to recoveries amounting, for all the institutions, to a total of around EUR 1,9 million. Manual data transferred into the NAP from the computer systems recording the situations qualifying the staff for specific entitlements constituted a further specific risk of errors. However, controls were not reinforced accordingly. A lack of control procedures concerning pension payments were noted in some institutions. Lastly, except for the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, occasional weaknesses were observed in the supervisory and control systems concerning procurement. Annual activity reports and declarations of the Directors-General : in 2004, improvements were made to the annual activity reports and the declarations of the Directors-General. However, weaknesses were found in the control systems. Specific observations on the Committee of the Regions (CoR) : the report indicates that the expenditure of the institution was EUR 63 million (against EUR 43 million in 2003). As regards the implementation of the CoR’s budget, the Court states that the main weaknesses concern: the application of a flat-rate sum, ranging from 30 % to 60 % of the maximum allowable amount, to staff who do not produce any evidence of having incurred accommodation costs; transfer of part of the salary with weighting coefficients granted without the necessary justification; procurement procedures. The Court notes further weaknesses in the implementation of internal control standards. They were approved only in November 2004, but not all the measures needed to achieve full compliance with them were taken. The internal audit function was carried out by a member of temporary staff, employed on the basis of renewable contracts of short duration. In May 2005 an official was nominated internal auditor. General conclusions : in conclusion, the Court considers, as a result of its audit, and in order to address the risks identified, that improvements should be made in the supervisory and control systems relating to the following areas: documentation of procedures; definition of the nature of the supporting documents which should make it possible to check that the expenditure is in accordance with the terms of the contracts or of the regulations and rules; grading of staff under the new staff regulations; remuneration, in particular payment of allowances and transfers of part of the staff emoluments with the application of a weighting coefficient. type: Court of Auditors: opinion, report body: CofA
  • date: 2006-02-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.890 title: PE369.890 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=5971%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 05971/2006 summary: PURPOSE : to present the Council recommendation on the discharge to be given to the other institutions in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2004. CONTENT : having regard to the observations made by the Court of Auditors, the Council calls on the European Parliament to give a discharge to all of the other EU institutions (other than the Commission). If overall the observations made by the Council are positive as regards expenditure, the Council believes that the implementation of the budget calls for a series of comments on the discharge which should be followed up. The Council welcomes the fact that the errors identified by the Court did not materially affect the legality and regularity of administrative expenditure as a whole. It notes with satisfaction the efforts and the progress made by the Institutions to adapt their supervisory systems and controls to the new Financial Regulation, but underlines that they have not fully implemented the Internal Control Standards. The Council takes note that the 2004 financial year has introduced specific risks resulting from the adoption of the new staff regulations, the introduction of a new system for calculating staff remuneration and the implementation of the new system in the framework of the new Financial Regulation at the same time. In this context, the Council shares the Court's view that particular attention should be paid to the various technical weaknesses detected in the implementation of the NAP (new payroll system), to an accurate application of the staff regulations in respect of travel allowances, to the improvement of the control systems concerning the transfer of part of the staff. type: Supplementary non-legislative basic document body: CSL
  • date: 2006-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE370.136 title: PE370.136 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-115&language=EN title: A6-0115/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4600&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)2095 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-10-07T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: title: N6-0027/2005 summary: PURPOSE : presentation of the final annual accounts of the European Community for the financial year 2004 – Other institutions : Section VII – Committee of the Regions. CONTENT : this document sets out the amount of expenditure and the financial statement of the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2004 and presents an analysis of its financial management. The available appropriations set out in the Committee’s 2004 budget amounted to EUR 59,6 million (taking account of a supplementary and amending budget of EUR 600.000), with a 83,6% utilisation rate. Main axes of 2004 expenditure : the budget implementation can be characterised as follows : Effects of the enlargement process : 95 new Members and 10 new Member State delegations; The consolidation of the institutional role of the CoR; The implementation of complementary actions aiming to enhance the CoR’s profile. It should also be noted that the budget has been increased for the Committee’s 4 political groups (PES, EPP, ALDE and UEN-EA) in particular for their meetings, activities and publications. Among the main activities in 2004, one notes in particular: the strengthening of its consultative activities (5 plenary session with a total of 55 opinions), the participation of Members at conferences/seminars throughout Europe, including one in Berlin on the Constitution as well as the organisation of various events; the implementation of a new communication policy : improving interinstitutional relations, improving the CoR’s profile, promoting its consultative activities (press releases, information notes, the conception of a new website); the strengthening the Institution’s “ greffe” service which aims to assist the members and national delegations in their daily tasks and to help ease the workload relating to enlargement. The main issues of the 2004 budget implementation can be summarised as follows: Title I (Staff costs) : this budget item shows the effects of the enlargement process. The institution’s budget, and in particular DG Administration, was nearly doubled to deal with the arrival of the new Members (+ 43% compared to 2003). 156 new posts were established which meant that there was roughly a 63% increase in staff. In comparison to the proposed initial budget, the main items which were subject to an under-utilisation were as follows: Members’ costs and allowances : travel expenses, various allowances, language classes, Payment of staff in activity and other recruitment costs : 60 “enlargement” positions still have to be filled out of the 156, Staff mission costs, Free lance interpreters fees (cancellation of numerous meetings,…). It should be added that the annual report presents a table showing the participation rate of the Members and the substitutes at the plenary sessions: over 2004, the average participation rate reached 77%. Title II (Operational expenditure) : this heading was characterised by the following : Building projects in 2004: the change of address of the CoR and the ESC. The initial budget was respected; New requirements following the enlargement process: the requirements are estimated at 15.000m² for the 2 Committees. These costs are divided between 3 new buildings : “Belliard 68”, “Trèves 74” and a third building. These buildings will not be available at the same time : only Belliard I and II and Belliard 68 were ready in 2004. Trèves 74 should be finished in 2006. It should be noted that the contract for the former CoR building (Ravenstein) was terminated mid-2004. In addition, the following should be noted: the carry over of a budget line to 2005 for the creation of a “Interinstitutional Library” in Brussels for the sum of EUR 30.473; advanced payment of appropriations in order to reduce the budgetary pressure under heading 5 of the financial perspectives : advanced payments in 2004 of ground rent for the “Belliard I” and “Trèves 74” building for a sum of roughly EUR 2,3 million; an under-utilisation of appropriations relating to building security issues, meeting and conference costs, technical material and transport costs (call for tender for the rental of cars carried over to 2005) and other running costs (newspaper subscriptions, telephone, press conferences). DETAILED SYNTHESIS OF 2004 EXPENDITURE : this detailed synthesis analyses the breakdown of the Committee of the Regions expenditure for the financial year 2004. The figures mentioned can also be found in the “Final annual accounts of the European Communities - Financial year 2004 – Volume III”. Implementation rate in 2004 : Appropriations available for 2004 : EUR 59.413.031 (with an interinstitutional amending budget of EUR 600.000 to fund the correction of increased salaries); Appropriations committed amounted to EUR de 49.654.384, an 83,57% utilisation rate; Appropriations paid amounted to EUR 44.072.451; Appropriations carried over from 2003 to 2004 : EUR 5.061.468,05. Main budget items and the use of commitment appropriations (Titles I and II): I : Institutional costs (Members and active staff) : EUR 30,9 million; II : Operational costs (buildings and materials) : EUR 18,8 million.
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) proposing that discharge be granted to the Committee of the Regions (CoR) for 2004. In its accompanying comments, the committee noted that, in the Court of Auditors' Annual Report, the CoR appeared to be "the institution with the highest number of criticisms of all the other institutions". It deplored the fact that the internal audit function was carried out by a member of temporary staff on short-term renewable contracts, and said that the CoR should have focused on setting up a fully functioning internal audit service in 2004, knowing the challenges resulting from enlargement. However, it welcomed the solution now found. MEPs also found it regrettable that the Court of Auditors was unable to take account of the CoR's annual activity report, as this had not been produced before the Court's audit was concluded. On the CoR's buildings policy, the committee concluded that renting buildings would significantly reduce the risks involved for small institutions and that "this solution should be considered as a serious alternative for future building projects". Lastly, the report noted that during 2004 the CoR had amended its rules on the refunding of travel expenses and the payment of travel and meeting allowances for its Members. However, given the lack of follow-up in 2004 to the OLAF report on fraud and irregularities at the CoR, MEPs demanded that the CoR abolish the imprest account system for the reimbursement of Members' travel expenses and adopt the same system as the European Economic and Social Committee.
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-115&language=EN title: A6-0115/2006
  • date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4600&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-163 title: T6-0163/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Nils LUNDGREN (IND/DEM, SE) and granted the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004. In its accompanying statements, Parliament noted that in 2004 the Committee of the Regions (CoR) administered a budget of EUR 59 413 031 with a utilisation rate of 83.57 %. Parliament underlined that the CoR appeared in the Court of Auditors' annual report to be the institution with the highest number of criticisms of all the other institutions. It criticised the fact that the internal audit function was carried out by a temporary member of staff employed on the basis of renewable contracts of short duration, but welcomed the solution now found. Parliament noted that according to the information given at the hearing of the other institutions organised by the Committee on Budgetary Control on 25 January 2006 certain matters are now the subject of an investigation by OLAF. In addition, the CoR trade unions contested the CoR's recent reorganisation exercise, which has been carried out despite some controversy as already pointed out in previous discharge resolutions. Parliament found it regrettable that the Court of Auditors was unable to take account of the CoR's annual activity report as it had not been produced before the Court's audit was concluded. With regard to buildings, Parliament felt that there should also be an audit of the Montoyer renovation. It noted that at the time Parliament recommended purchase, but now pointed to the fact that renting buildings would significantly reduce the risks involved for small institutions and that this solution should be considered as a serious alternative for future building projects. Parliament noted that while the authorising officer by delegation did not enter any formal reservations in his statement of assurance, he did annex to it a number of remarks, including the fact that due to weaknesses in the new payroll application (NAP) managed by the Commission, the sub-delegated authorising officers and their ex-ante verifiers were unable to guarantee the accuracy of all staff salary calculations. It acknowledged that weaknesses in the NAP were a problem for all institutions and not a specific problem for the CoR. Parliament went on to state that the CoR should have focused on the importance of setting up a fully functioning internal audit service in 2004, knowing the challenges resulting from enlargement. It noted the following as particular challenges: a substantial increase in the budget in 2004 (up 50 %); growth in staff numbers (up 63 %); the arrival of new members (up 43 %); the financial and regulatory impact of the new Staff Regulations; and the continuing implementation of the new Financial Regulation, together with the move of most of the CoR's services to the new buildings (Belliard 99-101 and Belliard 68), which took place in June 2004. Finally, Parliament recalled that, in relation to OLAF's findings, the public prosecutor at the Brussels Court of Appeal concluded in March 2005 that there was insufficient evidence to bring a prosecution and therefore decided to close the file without further action. Parliament demanded nevertheless, given the lack of follow-up in 2004 to the OLAF report on fraud and irregularities at the CoR, that the CoR abolish the imprest account system for the reimbursement of members' travel expenses and adopt the same system as the EESC.
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: to grant discharge to the Committee of the Regions for the 2004 financial year. LEGISLATIVE ACT: Decision 2006/815/EC of the European Parliament on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2004 (Section VII - Committee of the Regions). CONTENT: with the present decision, the European Parliament grants the Secretary-General of the Committee of the Regions discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2004. This decision is in line with the European Parliament’s resolution adopted on 27 April 2006 and comprises a series of observations that form an integral part of the discharge decision (please refer to the summary of the opinion of 27/04/2006). docs: title: Budget 2006/815 url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-815&language=EN title: OJ L 340 06.12.2006, p. 0043-0043 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/6/28880
New
  • CONT/6/28880
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 94
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 094
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.03.07 Previous discharges
New
8.70.03.07
Previous discharges
activities/6/docs/1/url
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC
New
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:SOM:EN:HTML
activities
  • date: 2005-10-07T00:00:00 docs: type: Non-legislative basic document published title: N6-0027/2005 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
  • date: 2005-11-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-03-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-115&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0115/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060426&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4600&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-163 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0163/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-12-06T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B[%g]-2006-815&language=EN title: Budget 2006/815 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2006:340:TOC title: OJ L 340 06.12.2006, p. 0043-0043
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-04-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: IND/DEM name: LUNDGREN Nils
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/6/28880
reference
2005/2096(DEC)
title
2004 discharge: EC general budget, Committee of the Regions
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 094
stage_reached
Procedure completed
type
DEC - Discharge procedure
final
subject
8.70.03.07 Previous discharges