BETA


2005/2163(INI) Recovery of Community funds

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CONT CASACA Paulo (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/02/05
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/11/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/10/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/10/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Paulo CASACA (PES, PT) on the recovery of Community funds. (Please see the summary of 13/09/2006.)

Documents
2006/10/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/10/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/09/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/09/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/09/13
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Paulo CASACA (PES, PT) on the recovery of Community funds. The report welcomed the three proposals submitted by the Commission as part of the 2002 reform of the Financial Regulation, including a five-year deadline for recovery of sums owed to the Community. It also called on the Member States to prove their compliance with international accounting standards and raised the possibility of the EU developing a common approach in this matter.

The committee referred to some well-known cases of wrongdoing (notably the 'Italburro' scandal over adulterated butter and the 'Blue Dragon' affair involving Spain and France), and stressed that "the Commission should not only seek to recover European funds from a Member State where they have been misused, but should also use its best endeavours to see that wrongdoers are prosecuted and their victims compensated". The possibility of closer cooperation with Eurojust and Europol needed to be explored in order to strengthen the real protection of the Union’s financial interests, and an evaluation should be carried out into the possibility of OLAF’s full administrative independence from the Commission and the other institutions.

The committee noted that OLAF did not possess suitable information on the quantities of incriminated products, while undertaking the inquiries in a criminal law context had proved "disastrous from the viewpoint of recovery, even if it is true that in strictly legal terms OLAF is entitled, on behalf of the Commission, to contest a national decision". MEPs also recalled that, while in some countries recovery proceedings may be initiated even if a criminal action is under way, in others criminal law has precedence over civil law, so that the existence of an action on the part of a judicial authority makes it impossible to recover the disputed sums. The committee deplored the fact that "in some Member States irregularities and frauds are admitted only in respect of individually proven sums, that is, lot by lot, and that where no lot is present the operator is automatically deemed innocent".

The report said that the creation of the office of European Public Prosecutor would be a decision of major importance, since it would facilitate direct access to the national public prosecutor’s offices, thus working in the interests of a more ‘joined-up’ procedure. This should help reduce complexity, since the result should be a converged use of the European Prosecutor’s services. The committee pointed out that, while OLAF enjoys powers of intervention in the context of its inquiries, it does not enjoy judicial powers. The report also noted that the project to establish a European Public Prosecutor must be regarded more as a long-term undertaking, and that, in order to achieve an improvement in the short term, "coordination between Member States' public prosecutors must be central to plans to create added value", in terms of reducing OLAF's workload and protecting the financial interests of the Community.

2006/07/25
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/06/30
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/09/29
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/07/12
   EP - CASACA Paulo (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Casaca A6-0303/2006 - par. 43 #

2006/10/24 Outcome: +: 546, -: 75, 0: 13
DE FR IT ES PL NL EL HU PT AT BE FI SE SK DK LT CY EE LU SI MT GB IE CZ LV
Total
88
69
60
42
51
24
22
20
18
18
19
13
16
13
13
12
6
6
6
5
5
67
12
20
9
icon: PSE PSE
178

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
230

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
36

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
26

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
29

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

1
icon: UEN UEN
27

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Rapport Casaca A6-0303/2006 - par. 44 #

2006/10/24 Outcome: +: 512, -: 109, 0: 15
DE FR IT ES HU EL PL NL AT BE PT FI SK LT DK CY EE LU SI MT LV IE CZ SE GB
Total
88
69
60
45
20
22
51
24
18
19
19
12
14
12
12
6
6
6
5
5
9
12
21
15
66
icon: PSE PSE
177

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
233
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
74

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
27

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Rapport Casaca A6-0303/2006 - par. 45 #

2006/10/24 Outcome: +: 516, -: 96, 0: 19
DE FR IT ES PL NL HU EL AT BE PT FI DK SK LT CY EE LU SI MT SE LV IE CZ GB
Total
85
68
59
44
49
24
19
22
18
19
19
13
13
14
12
6
6
6
5
5
15
9
12
22
67
icon: PSE PSE
174

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
231

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
73

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Germany GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
27

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
30

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

1

United Kingdom NI

3
icon: UEN UEN
27

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12650&j=0&l=en
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12650&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12650&j=1&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.061
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE374.061
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.678
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE376.678
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0303_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0303_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12650&j=1&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2006-09-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0303_EN.html title: A6-0303/2006
events/2
date
2006-09-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0303_EN.html title: A6-0303/2006
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061023&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061023&type=CRE
events/5
date
2006-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0438_EN.html title: T6-0438/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Paulo CASACA (PES, PT) on the recovery of Community funds. (Please see the summary of 13/09/2006.)
events/5
date
2006-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0438_EN.html title: T6-0438/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Paulo CASACA (PES, PT) on the recovery of Community funds. (Please see the summary of 13/09/2006.)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
rapporteur
name: CASACA Paulo date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2005-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CASACA Paulo group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-303&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0303_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
docs/4/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-303&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0303_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-438
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0438_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASACA Paulo
  • date: 2006-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASACA Paulo type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-303&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0303/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061023&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12650&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-438 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0438/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: KALLAS Siim
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
date
2005-07-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CASACA Paulo group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
CONT
date
2005-07-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgetary Control
rapporteur
group: PSE name: CASACA Paulo
docs
  • date: 2006-06-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.061 title: PE374.061 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-07-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.678 title: PE376.678 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-303&language=EN title: A6-0303/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=12650&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)5316-2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2007-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=12650&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)5914 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-09-13T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report by Paulo CASACA (PES, PT) on the recovery of Community funds. The report welcomed the three proposals submitted by the Commission as part of the 2002 reform of the Financial Regulation, including a five-year deadline for recovery of sums owed to the Community. It also called on the Member States to prove their compliance with international accounting standards and raised the possibility of the EU developing a common approach in this matter. The committee referred to some well-known cases of wrongdoing (notably the 'Italburro' scandal over adulterated butter and the 'Blue Dragon' affair involving Spain and France), and stressed that "the Commission should not only seek to recover European funds from a Member State where they have been misused, but should also use its best endeavours to see that wrongdoers are prosecuted and their victims compensated". The possibility of closer cooperation with Eurojust and Europol needed to be explored in order to strengthen the real protection of the Union’s financial interests, and an evaluation should be carried out into the possibility of OLAF’s full administrative independence from the Commission and the other institutions. The committee noted that OLAF did not possess suitable information on the quantities of incriminated products, while undertaking the inquiries in a criminal law context had proved "disastrous from the viewpoint of recovery, even if it is true that in strictly legal terms OLAF is entitled, on behalf of the Commission, to contest a national decision". MEPs also recalled that, while in some countries recovery proceedings may be initiated even if a criminal action is under way, in others criminal law has precedence over civil law, so that the existence of an action on the part of a judicial authority makes it impossible to recover the disputed sums. The committee deplored the fact that "in some Member States irregularities and frauds are admitted only in respect of individually proven sums, that is, lot by lot, and that where no lot is present the operator is automatically deemed innocent". The report said that the creation of the office of European Public Prosecutor would be a decision of major importance, since it would facilitate direct access to the national public prosecutor’s offices, thus working in the interests of a more ‘joined-up’ procedure. This should help reduce complexity, since the result should be a converged use of the European Prosecutor’s services. The committee pointed out that, while OLAF enjoys powers of intervention in the context of its inquiries, it does not enjoy judicial powers. The report also noted that the project to establish a European Public Prosecutor must be regarded more as a long-term undertaking, and that, in order to achieve an improvement in the short term, "coordination between Member States' public prosecutors must be central to plans to create added value", in terms of reducing OLAF's workload and protecting the financial interests of the Community.
  • date: 2006-09-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-303&language=EN title: A6-0303/2006
  • date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061023&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12650&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-438 title: T6-0438/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Paulo CASACA (PES, PT) on the recovery of Community funds. (Please see the summary of 13/09/2006.)
  • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CONT/6/30180
New
  • CONT/6/30180
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources
New
8.70.01
Financing of the budget, own resources
activities
  • date: 2005-09-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASACA Paulo
  • date: 2006-09-13T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASACA Paulo type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-303&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0303/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061023&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12650&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-438 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0438/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: CONT date: 2005-07-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgetary Control rapporteur: group: PSE name: CASACA Paulo
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget commissioner: KALLAS Siim
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
CONT/6/30180
reference
2005/2163(INI)
title
Recovery of Community funds
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.70.01 Financing of the budget, own resources