BETA


2005/2214(INI) Outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFCO KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion JURI BERGER Maria (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion PETI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 52

Events

2006/08/01
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/06/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/05/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/05/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN (GUE/NGL, DE) in response to the Commission communication on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator. (Please see the summary dated 25/04/2006.)

Documents
2006/05/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/05/15
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/04/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/04/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/04/25
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN (GUE/NGL, DE) in response to the Commission communication on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator. The committee welcomed the communication and said that the withdrawal or modification of the great majority of the proposals mentioned in it would "contribute to a simplification of the Community legislative environment". MEPs insisted, however, that the Commission should take into proper consideration the objections raised by the President of the European Parliament. The committee welcomed the fact that, before adopting its final position, the Commission had again reviewed its proposals in the light of Parliament’s objections. It acknowledged that, in every case in which the Commission had not accepted those objections, it had stated reasons for not doing so and that in some cases it had also indicated possible initiatives by means of which Parliament's wishes could be met. The report stressed that in future proceedings of this nature, the Commission should present specific reasons for the withdrawal or the modification of each proposal, and "not confine itself to invoking general principles that do not clearly explain the reasons why the Commission believes that a specific proposal should be withdrawn or modified"

MEPs asked the Commission, immediately after it has been appointed, to draw up and submit to Parliament and the Council a list stating which of its predecessor's legislative proposals it intends to retain. They also asked the Commission to include in its annual legislative and working programme a list of the proposals it intends to withdraw or modify, in order to allow Parliament to express its point of view in accordance with its prerogatives under the Treaties and the procedures laid down in the Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005. The committee recognised, however, that, within clear limits, the ability of the Commission to withdraw a legislative proposal during a procedure leading to its adoption:

- flows from its right of legislative initiative and constitutes a logical complement to its ability to modify a proposal,

- may contribute to enhancing the role of the Commission in the legislative procedure, and

- can be considered as a positive element in ensuring that the procedures leading to the adoption of a Community act and the interinstitutional dialogue are aimed at promoting the 'Community interest'.

Lastly, the report put forward the following guidelines on the withdrawal and the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission:

(a) the Commission may, in principle, withdraw or modify a legislative proposal at any time during the procedures leading to its adoption as long as the Council has not acted. This means that in codecision and cooperation procedures the Commission may no longer do so after the adoption of the common position by the Council unless, in its decision on the common position, the Council has exceeded its powers to amend the Commission proposal, so that the decision in reality constitutes a legislative initiative by the Council itself, for which the Treaty does not provide;

(b) where Parliament has rejected a legislative proposal or has suggested substantial amendments to it, or where Parliament has in some other way asked the Commission to withdraw or substantially modify a legislative proposal, the Commission shall take this position into proper consideration. If, for important reasons, the Commission decides not to follow the position expressed by Parliament, it shall explain the reasons for that decision in a statement to Parliament;

(c) where the Commission intends to withdraw or modify a legislative proposal on its own initiative, it shall give Parliament prior notification of its intention. This notification shall be given in good time, allowing Parliament the opportunity to give its view on the matter, and shall include a clear explanation of the reasons for which the Commission believes that a specific proposal should be withdrawn or modified. The Commission shall take the view of Parliament into proper consideration. If, for important reasons, the Commission decides to withdraw or modify its proposal, against the wishes of Parliament, it shall explain the reasons for that decision in a statement to Parliament.

2006/04/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/03/24
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/03/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/02/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2005/12/12
   EP - BERGER Maria (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2005/11/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2005/11/17
   EP - KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2005/09/27
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

The Commission has previously announced its intention to screen proposals that are pending before the Council/Parliament with regard to their general relevance, their impact on competitiveness and other effects. The objectives, process and outcomes of this screening exercise, which is the first of its kind, are presented in this Communication.

Objectives of the screening of pending proposals: The screening exercise aimed at enabling the Commission to ensure that all pending legislative proposals are fully consistent with the political priorities of the Commission and to check whether changed circumstances justify a review of the initial approach followed. More specifically, the screening exercise aimed at testing pending proposals on three accounts:

-pending proposals were examined for their consistency with the EU Lisbon objectives and in particular the goal of promoting competitiveness. The criteria used for evaluating proposals in this respect were those specified in the ‘competitiveness test’ that forms part of the recently revised impact assessment guidelines;

-pending proposals were checked for possible lack of substantial progress in the legislative process for a significant period of time.

-pending proposals were examined to determine whether they meet current better regulation requirements, notably with regard to appropriate impact assessments. This criterion affects in particular those proposals presented at a time when impact assessments were not a formal requirement.

Process of the screening exercise: The scope of the exercise was limited to pending proposals dated before 1 January 2004. This amounted to 183 proposals. The Commission then identified about 100 proposals that constitute truly new legislative initiatives. The proposals were further evaluated for possible adverse effects on competitiveness and broader economic effects. The rest consist of proposals that are likely to have limited or no impact on competitiveness. These relate mainly to proposals resulting from international obligations or constituting adaptations of the acquis to scientific and technical progress. Some of these proposals also directly contribute to “better regulation” as they codify or simplify the acquis.

Outcomes of the screening exercise: The Commission envisages two broad types of action:

-The Commission intends to withdraw in total 68 proposals. These are considered not to be consistent with the Lisbon objectives or Better Regulation principles, or they are making insufficient progress in the legislative process or are no longer topical.

-Proposals to be maintained in the legislative process but with economic analysis to be presented to the assessment of the legislative authority .This concerns 5 proposals where additional presentation of the analysis of their impact is likely to facilitate decision making by the Legislative Authority. Thus, in total some 73 pending proposals will be subject to some form of intervention.

The withdrawals represent some 31% of all pending proposals from before 1 January 2004. All interventions including proposals singled out for further economic analysis actually represent 33 %8 of those pending proposals.

Moreover, for at least 2 proposals, the screening exercise has produced results that do not fall directly into the above categories. First, concerning the proposal for a Council Directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents – optical radiations, 1992/0449/COD, for which the screening exercise has led the Commission to conclude that the aspects dealing with exposure of workers to natural optical radiation should be deleted, as proposed also by the European Parliament.

Secondly, concerning the proposal on Temporary Workers (2002/0072/COD), the Commission reserves its position to reconsider the proposal in light of future discussions on other proposals.

The Annex to the communication summarises the situation and gives details of the proposals concerned.

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
rapporteur
name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2005-11-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: BERGER Maria date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2005-12-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BERGER Maria group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-143&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0143_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0462/COM_COM(2005)0462_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0462/COM_COM(2005)0462_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-143&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0143_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-206
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0206_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0462/COM_COM(2005)0462_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0462 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52005DC0462:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/ title: Legal Service type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERGER Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-04-25T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERGER Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-143&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0143/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060515&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4658&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-206 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0206/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Legal Service commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
date
2005-11-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFCO
date
2005-11-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2005-12-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BERGER Maria
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2005-12-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BERGER Maria group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2006-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE370.018 title: PE370.018 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.916&secondRef=02 title: PE369.916 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.801 title: PE371.801 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE372.122 title: PE372.122 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-143&language=EN title: A6-0143/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4658&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)2902 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-08-01T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4658&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)3065-2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-09-27T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0462/COM_COM(2005)0462_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0462 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=462 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission has previously announced its intention to screen proposals that are pending before the Council/Parliament with regard to their general relevance, their impact on competitiveness and other effects. The objectives, process and outcomes of this screening exercise, which is the first of its kind, are presented in this Communication. Objectives of the screening of pending proposals: The screening exercise aimed at enabling the Commission to ensure that all pending legislative proposals are fully consistent with the political priorities of the Commission and to check whether changed circumstances justify a review of the initial approach followed. More specifically, the screening exercise aimed at testing pending proposals on three accounts: -pending proposals were examined for their consistency with the EU Lisbon objectives and in particular the goal of promoting competitiveness. The criteria used for evaluating proposals in this respect were those specified in the ‘competitiveness test’ that forms part of the recently revised impact assessment guidelines; -pending proposals were checked for possible lack of substantial progress in the legislative process for a significant period of time. -pending proposals were examined to determine whether they meet current better regulation requirements, notably with regard to appropriate impact assessments. This criterion affects in particular those proposals presented at a time when impact assessments were not a formal requirement. Process of the screening exercise: The scope of the exercise was limited to pending proposals dated before 1 January 2004. This amounted to 183 proposals. The Commission then identified about 100 proposals that constitute truly new legislative initiatives. The proposals were further evaluated for possible adverse effects on competitiveness and broader economic effects. The rest consist of proposals that are likely to have limited or no impact on competitiveness. These relate mainly to proposals resulting from international obligations or constituting adaptations of the acquis to scientific and technical progress. Some of these proposals also directly contribute to “better regulation” as they codify or simplify the acquis. Outcomes of the screening exercise: The Commission envisages two broad types of action: -The Commission intends to withdraw in total 68 proposals. These are considered not to be consistent with the Lisbon objectives or Better Regulation principles, or they are making insufficient progress in the legislative process or are no longer topical. -Proposals to be maintained in the legislative process but with economic analysis to be presented to the assessment of the legislative authority .This concerns 5 proposals where additional presentation of the analysis of their impact is likely to facilitate decision making by the Legislative Authority. Thus, in total some 73 pending proposals will be subject to some form of intervention. The withdrawals represent some 31% of all pending proposals from before 1 January 2004. All interventions including proposals singled out for further economic analysis actually represent 33 %8 of those pending proposals. Moreover, for at least 2 proposals, the screening exercise has produced results that do not fall directly into the above categories. First, concerning the proposal for a Council Directive on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents – optical radiations, 1992/0449/COD, for which the screening exercise has led the Commission to conclude that the aspects dealing with exposure of workers to natural optical radiation should be deleted, as proposed also by the European Parliament. Secondly, concerning the proposal on Temporary Workers (2002/0072/COD), the Commission reserves its position to reconsider the proposal in light of future discussions on other proposals. The Annex to the communication summarises the situation and gives details of the proposals concerned.
  • date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-25T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN (GUE/NGL, DE) in response to the Commission communication on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator. The committee welcomed the communication and said that the withdrawal or modification of the great majority of the proposals mentioned in it would "contribute to a simplification of the Community legislative environment". MEPs insisted, however, that the Commission should take into proper consideration the objections raised by the President of the European Parliament. The committee welcomed the fact that, before adopting its final position, the Commission had again reviewed its proposals in the light of Parliament’s objections. It acknowledged that, in every case in which the Commission had not accepted those objections, it had stated reasons for not doing so and that in some cases it had also indicated possible initiatives by means of which Parliament's wishes could be met. The report stressed that in future proceedings of this nature, the Commission should present specific reasons for the withdrawal or the modification of each proposal, and "not confine itself to invoking general principles that do not clearly explain the reasons why the Commission believes that a specific proposal should be withdrawn or modified" MEPs asked the Commission, immediately after it has been appointed, to draw up and submit to Parliament and the Council a list stating which of its predecessor's legislative proposals it intends to retain. They also asked the Commission to include in its annual legislative and working programme a list of the proposals it intends to withdraw or modify, in order to allow Parliament to express its point of view in accordance with its prerogatives under the Treaties and the procedures laid down in the Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005. The committee recognised, however, that, within clear limits, the ability of the Commission to withdraw a legislative proposal during a procedure leading to its adoption: - flows from its right of legislative initiative and constitutes a logical complement to its ability to modify a proposal, - may contribute to enhancing the role of the Commission in the legislative procedure, and - can be considered as a positive element in ensuring that the procedures leading to the adoption of a Community act and the interinstitutional dialogue are aimed at promoting the 'Community interest'. Lastly, the report put forward the following guidelines on the withdrawal and the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission: (a) the Commission may, in principle, withdraw or modify a legislative proposal at any time during the procedures leading to its adoption as long as the Council has not acted. This means that in codecision and cooperation procedures the Commission may no longer do so after the adoption of the common position by the Council unless, in its decision on the common position, the Council has exceeded its powers to amend the Commission proposal, so that the decision in reality constitutes a legislative initiative by the Council itself, for which the Treaty does not provide; (b) where Parliament has rejected a legislative proposal or has suggested substantial amendments to it, or where Parliament has in some other way asked the Commission to withdraw or substantially modify a legislative proposal, the Commission shall take this position into proper consideration. If, for important reasons, the Commission decides not to follow the position expressed by Parliament, it shall explain the reasons for that decision in a statement to Parliament; (c) where the Commission intends to withdraw or modify a legislative proposal on its own initiative, it shall give Parliament prior notification of its intention. This notification shall be given in good time, allowing Parliament the opportunity to give its view on the matter, and shall include a clear explanation of the reasons for which the Commission believes that a specific proposal should be withdrawn or modified. The Commission shall take the view of Parliament into proper consideration. If, for important reasons, the Commission decides to withdraw or modify its proposal, against the wishes of Parliament, it shall explain the reasons for that decision in a statement to Parliament.
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-143&language=EN title: A6-0143/2006
  • date: 2006-05-15T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060515&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4658&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-206 title: T6-0206/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Sylvia-Yvonne KAUFMANN (GUE/NGL, DE) in response to the Commission communication on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator. (Please see the summary dated 25/04/2006.)
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/ title: Legal Service
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFCO/6/31691
New
  • AFCO/6/31691
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.50.02 Legislative simplification, coordination, codification
New
8.50.02
Legislative simplification, coordination, codification
activities
  • date: 2005-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0462/COM_COM(2005)0462_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0462 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52005DC0462:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/ title: Legal Service type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERGER Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-04-25T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERGER Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-143&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0143/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-05-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060515&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4658&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-206 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0206/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFCO date: 2005-11-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Constitutional Affairs rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: KAUFMANN Sylvia-Yvonne
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: BERGER Maria
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/ title: Legal Service
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFCO/6/31691
reference
2005/2214(INI)
title
Outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.50.02 Legislative simplification, coordination, codification