BETA


2005/2584(RSP) Resolution on the proposal by the Council amending the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 112-p2

Events

2005/07/06
   EP - Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
Details

The "comitology" procedure is throwing up another conflict between MEPs and the European Commission. This time the dispute is over whether to scrap restrictions imposed two years ago on the use of decaBDE, a brominated flame-retardant used chiefly to ensure that electric and electronic devices, such as televisions and computers, do not burst into flames. The Commission wants to lift the restrictions but MEPs adopted a resolution opposing this plan.

Parliament is of the opinion that the Commission has clearly exceeded its implementing powers and they are calling on the Council to oppose the proposal. They dispute the scientific basis of the Commission's proposal and believe the restrictions should stay in place. A scientific advisory committee of the Commission itself also takes this view. Brominated flame-retardants can have toxic effects on health and the environment. Some of them, penta- and octaBDE, were in fact completely banned two years ago. Parliament fought up to the conciliation stage to win a ban on octaBDE and restrictions on decaBDE, pending - for the latter - more precise risk assessments. The assessments carried out do not convince MEPs and they note that less toxic substitute products exist.

2005/07/06
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2005/07/06
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The "comitology" procedure is throwing up another conflict between MEPs and the European Commission. This time the dispute is over whether to scrap restrictions imposed two years ago on the use of decaBDE, a brominated flame-retardant used chiefly to ensure that electric and electronic devices, such as televisions and computers, do not burst into flames. The Commission wants to lift the restrictions but MEPs adopted a resolution opposing this plan.

Parliament is of the opinion that the Commission has clearly exceeded its implementing powers and they are calling on the Council to oppose the proposal. They dispute the scientific basis of the Commission's proposal and believe the restrictions should stay in place. A scientific advisory committee of the Commission itself also takes this view. Brominated flame-retardants can have toxic effects on health and the environment. Some of them, penta- and octaBDE, were in fact completely banned two years ago. Parliament fought up to the conciliation stage to win a ban on octaBDE and restrictions on decaBDE, pending - for the latter - more precise risk assessments. The assessments carried out do not convince MEPs and they note that less toxic substitute products exist.

Documents
2005/07/06
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2005/06/30
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0392_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0392_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0274_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0274_EN.html
events/1
date
2005-07-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0274_EN.html title: T6-0274/2005
summary
events/1
date
2005-07-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0274_EN.html title: T6-0274/2005
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 112-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 106-p2
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-392&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2005-0392_EN.html
docs/1
date
2005-07-06T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
docs/1
date
2005-07-06T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects
body
EP
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-274
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2005-0274_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12036&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-274 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0274/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
    docs
    • date: 2005-06-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2005-392&language=EN title: B6-0392/2005 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-274 title: T6-0274/2005 url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:157E:SOM:EN:HTML title: OJ C 157 06.07.2006, p. 0094-0263 E summary: The "comitology" procedure is throwing up another conflict between MEPs and the European Commission. This time the dispute is over whether to scrap restrictions imposed two years ago on the use of decaBDE, a brominated flame-retardant used chiefly to ensure that electric and electronic devices, such as televisions and computers, do not burst into flames. The Commission wants to lift the restrictions but MEPs adopted a resolution opposing this plan. Parliament is of the opinion that the Commission has clearly exceeded its implementing powers and they are calling on the Council to oppose the proposal. They dispute the scientific basis of the Commission's proposal and believe the restrictions should stay in place. A scientific advisory committee of the Commission itself also takes this view. Brominated flame-retardants can have toxic effects on health and the environment. Some of them, penta- and octaBDE, were in fact completely banned two years ago. Parliament fought up to the conciliation stage to win a ban on octaBDE and restrictions on decaBDE, pending - for the latter - more precise risk assessments. The assessments carried out do not convince MEPs and they note that less toxic substitute products exist. type: Text adopted by Parliament, topical subjects body: EP
    events
    • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12036&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-274 title: T6-0274/2005 summary: The "comitology" procedure is throwing up another conflict between MEPs and the European Commission. This time the dispute is over whether to scrap restrictions imposed two years ago on the use of decaBDE, a brominated flame-retardant used chiefly to ensure that electric and electronic devices, such as televisions and computers, do not burst into flames. The Commission wants to lift the restrictions but MEPs adopted a resolution opposing this plan. Parliament is of the opinion that the Commission has clearly exceeded its implementing powers and they are calling on the Council to oppose the proposal. They dispute the scientific basis of the Commission's proposal and believe the restrictions should stay in place. A scientific advisory committee of the Commission itself also takes this view. Brominated flame-retardants can have toxic effects on health and the environment. Some of them, penta- and octaBDE, were in fact completely banned two years ago. Parliament fought up to the conciliation stage to win a ban on octaBDE and restrictions on decaBDE, pending - for the latter - more precise risk assessments. The assessments carried out do not convince MEPs and they note that less toxic substitute products exist.
    • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 106-p2
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 106-p2
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, robotics
      • 3.70.13 Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
      • 4.60.04.02 Consumer security
      New
      3.40.06
      Electronics, electrotechnical industries, ICT, robotics
      3.70.13
      Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
      4.60.04.02
      Consumer security
      procedure/subtype
      Old
      Comitology resolution
      New
      Resolution on implementing act or powers
      procedure/subject/0
      Old
      3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries
      New
      3.40.06 Electronics, electrotechnical industries, robotics
      activities
      • date: 2005-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12036&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2005-274 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0274/2005 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2005/2584(RSP)
          title
          Resolution on the proposal by the Council amending the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC on the restriction of the use of hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 106-p2
          stage_reached
          Procedure completed
          subtype
          Comitology resolution
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject