BETA


2006/2008(INI) Commission recommendation of 18 May 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services (recom. 2005/737/EC)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI LÉVAI Katalin (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion CULT MAVROMMATIS Manolis (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/05/03
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/03/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Katalin LEVAI (PES, HU) in response to the Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. Parliament criticised the Commission for failing to undertake a thorough consultation process with interested parties and with Parliament before adopting the Recommendation. All categories of right-holders must be consulted on any future regulatory activities in this area so as to ensure a fair and balanced representation of interests. Parliament also criticised the "soft law" approach. Parliament felt that the Recommendation was inadequate for the following reasons :

- it sought merely to regulate the online sale of music recordings, but could – owing to its imprecise wording – also be applied to other online services (e.g. broadcasting services) containing music recordings;

- there was a risk that right-holders complying with the recommendation in respect of their interactive online rights would deprive local collective rights managers (CRMs) of other rights (e.g. those relating to broadcasting), thus preventing users of those rights from acquiring user rights for a diversified repertoire from one and the same CRM ;

- national CRMs should continue to play an important role in providing support for the promotion of new and minority right-holders, cultural diversity, creativity and local repertoires, which presupposed that national CRMs should retain the right to charge cultural deductions ;

- there was concern about the potentially negative effects of some provisions of the Recommendation on local repertoires and on cultural diversity given the potential risk of favouring a concentration of rights in the bigger CRMs. The impact of any initiative for the introduction of competition between rights managers in attracting the most profitable right-holders must be examined and weighed against the adverse effects of such an approach on smaller right-holders, small and medium-sized CRMs and cultural diversity.

Parliament invited the Commission to make it clear that the 2005 Recommendation applied exclusively to online sales of music recordings, and to present a proposal for a flexible framework directive to be adopted by codecision. This should aim at regulating the collective management of copyright and related rights as regards cross-border online music services, while taking account of the specificity of the digital era and safeguarding European cultural diversity, small stakeholders and local repertoires, on the basis of the principle of equal treatment. The Commission's consultation of interested parties should be as broadly based as possible. The proposed directive should not in any way undermine the competitiveness of the underlying creative businesses, the effectiveness of the services provided by CRMs or the competitiveness of user businesses – in particular small right-holders and users – and should: guarantee right-holders a high degree of protection and equal treatment; ensure that legal provisions have a real impact on the effective protection of all categories of right-holders; be based on solidarity and an adequate, equitable balance between right-holders within CRMs; avoid downward pressure on royalty levels by ensuring that users are licensed on the basis of the tariff applicable in the country where the consumption of the copyrighted work (the so-called "country of destination") will take place, and help to achieve an appropriate level of royalties for the right-holders.

MEPs also wanted to avoid the over-centralisation of market powers and repertoires by ensuring that exclusive mandates may not be granted to a single or a very few CRMs by major right-holders. In this way, the global repertoire would remain available to all CRMs for the granting of licences to users. They also said that it was crucial to prohibit any form of exclusive mandate between major right-holders and CRMs for the direct collection of royalties in all Member States, as this would lead to the rapid extinction of national CRMs and undermine the position of minority repertoires and cultural diversity in Europe.

A CRM should be free to provide commercial users based anywhere in the EU with pan-European and multi-repertoire licences for online uses (including mobile telephony uses), on fair and individually negotiated terms and without discrimination between users. The Commission was urged to conduct an assessment of the impact of a global licence for online services and its effects on the economic and social situation of authors.

Documents
2007/03/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/03/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/03/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/03/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/02/27
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Katalin LEVAI (PES, HU) in response to the Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. MEPs were critical of the Commission's failure to consult interested parties and Parliament before adopting the Recommendation, and also criticised the "soft law" approach. They called on the Commission to propose a framework directive, to be adopted under the codecision procedure, for regulating the collective management of cross-border online music services, "while taking account of the specificity of the digital era and safeguarding European cultural diversity, small stakeholders and local repertoires".

The committee stressed that the proposed directive should not in any way undermine the competitiveness of the underlying creative businesses, the effectiveness of the services provided by collective rights managers (CRMs) or the competitiveness of user businesses, in particular small right-holders and users. It therefore called for such a directive to guarantee right-holders a high degree of protection and equal treatment, ensure "comprehensive transparency" in CRMs, promote creativity and cultural diversity, and allow "fair and controlled" competition. MEPs also wanted to avoid the over-centralisation of market powers and repertoires by ensuring that exclusive mandates may not be granted to a single or a very few CRMs by major right-holders. In this way, the global repertoire would remain available to all CRMs for the granting of licences to users. They also said that it was crucial to prohibit any form of exclusive mandate between major right-holders and CRMs for the direct collection of royalties in all Member States, as this would lead to "the rapid extinction of national CRMs and undermine the position of minority repertoires and cultural diversity in Europe". Lastly, the Commission was urged to conduct an assessment of the impact of a global licence for online services and its effects on the economic and social situation of authors.

2007/02/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/12/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/11/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/07/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/02/13
   EP - MAVROMMATIS Manolis (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2006/01/19
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/12/12
   EP - LÉVAI Katalin (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2005/10/21
   Final act published in Official Journal
2005/05/18
   EU - Document attached to the procedure
Details

ACT : Commission Recommendation 2005/737/EC on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services.

CONTENT : new technologies have led to the emergence of a new generation of commercial users that make use of musical works and other subject matter online. The provision of legitimate online music services requires management of a series of copyright and related rights. One category of those rights is the exclusive right of reproduction which covers all reproductions made in the process of online distribution of a musical work.

Other categories of rights include :

§ the right of communication to the public of musical works;

§ the right to equitable remuneration for the communication to the public of other subject matter;

§ the exclusive right of making available a musical work or other subject matter.

This Recommendation invites the Member States to take the steps necessary to facilitate the growth of legitimate online services in the Community by promoting a regulatory environment which is best suited to the management, at Community level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services. It is addressed to the Member States and to all economic operators which are involved in the management of copyright and related rights within the Community.

It also covers :

§ the relationship between right-holders, collective rights managers and commercial users;

§ equitable distribution and deductions;

§ non-discrimination and representation;

§ accountability;

§ dispute settlement.

Lastly, Member States and collective rights managers are invited to report, on a yearly basis, to the Commission on the measures they have taken in relation to this Recommendation and on the management, at Community level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services.

2005/05/17
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services.

New technologies have led to the emergence of a new generation of commercial users that make use of musical works and other subject matter online. Those providing online music services are entitled to copyright provisions and related rights. One category of those rights is the exclusive right of reproduction, which covers all reproductions made in the process of online distribution of a musical work. Other categories of rights are the right of communication to the public of musical works and the exclusive right of making a musical work or other subject matter available. The ubiquitous nature of online services makes it necessary to seek solutions to the management of rights at a Community, rather than, national level.

The Commission Recommendation, therefore, invites the Member States to foster a regulatory climate, in support of the management of cross-border rights. This Recommendation is addressed to the Member States and to all economic operators involved in the management of copyright and related rights within the Community. The Recommendation has been organised along the following lines:

- Establishing various definitions for terms pertinent to the scope of the Recommendation (such as management of copyright and musical works etc.)

- The relationship between right-holders, collective rights managers and commercial users.

- Equitable distribution and deductions.

- Non-discrimination and representation

- Accountability and dispute settlements.

Member States and collective rights managers are invited to report, on a yearly basis, on measures they have taken in relation to this Recommendation and on the management, at Community level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services.

Documents

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EU
docs/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EU
docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-374024_EN.html
events/0
date
2005-05-17T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
title: 32005H0737
summary
events/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
title: 32005H0737
summary
docs/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EU
docs/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EU
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.024&secondRef=03
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.834
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE380.834
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE382.370
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE382.370
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE384.567
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE384.567
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0053_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0053_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13354&j=0&l=en
events/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
title: 32005H0737
summary
events/0
date
2005-05-18T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
title: 32005H0737
summary
events/2/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2007-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0053_EN.html title: A6-0053/2007
events/4
date
2007-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0053_EN.html title: A6-0053/2007
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070312&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20070312&type=CRE
events/6
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0064_EN.html title: T6-0064/2007
summary
events/6
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0064_EN.html title: T6-0064/2007
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: LÉVAI Katalin date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2005-12-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LÉVAI Katalin group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-02-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2005:276:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:276:SOM:EN:HTML
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-53&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0053_EN.html
docs/6/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-53&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0053_EN.html
events/6
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-64 title: T6-0064/2007
summary
events/6
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13354&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-64
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0064_EN.html
events/7
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-64 title: T6-0064/2007
summary
activities
  • date: 2005-05-18T00:00:00 docs: title: 32005H0737 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:32005H0737:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-10-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
  • date: 2006-01-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: LÉVAI Katalin
  • date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: LÉVAI Katalin type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-53&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0053/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13354&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-64 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0064/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2005-12-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LÉVAI Katalin group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2006-02-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2006-02-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2005-12-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: LÉVAI Katalin
docs
  • date: 2005-05-18T00:00:00 docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2005:276:TOC title: OJ L 276 21.10.2005, p. 0054-0057 title: 32005H0737 summary: ACT : Commission Recommendation 2005/737/EC on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. CONTENT : new technologies have led to the emergence of a new generation of commercial users that make use of musical works and other subject matter online. The provision of legitimate online music services requires management of a series of copyright and related rights. One category of those rights is the exclusive right of reproduction which covers all reproductions made in the process of online distribution of a musical work. Other categories of rights include : § the right of communication to the public of musical works; § the right to equitable remuneration for the communication to the public of other subject matter; § the exclusive right of making available a musical work or other subject matter. This Recommendation invites the Member States to take the steps necessary to facilitate the growth of legitimate online services in the Community by promoting a regulatory environment which is best suited to the management, at Community level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services. It is addressed to the Member States and to all economic operators which are involved in the management of copyright and related rights within the Community. It also covers : § the relationship between right-holders, collective rights managers and commercial users; § equitable distribution and deductions; § non-discrimination and representation; § accountability; § dispute settlement. Lastly, Member States and collective rights managers are invited to report, on a yearly basis, to the Commission on the measures they have taken in relation to this Recommendation and on the management, at Community level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EU
  • date: 2006-07-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.024&secondRef=03 title: PE374.024 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.834 title: PE380.834 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE382.370 title: PE382.370 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE384.567 title: PE384.567 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-53&language=EN title: A6-0053/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13354&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)1901/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-05-18T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: title: 32005H0737 summary: COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. New technologies have led to the emergence of a new generation of commercial users that make use of musical works and other subject matter online. Those providing online music services are entitled to copyright provisions and related rights. One category of those rights is the exclusive right of reproduction, which covers all reproductions made in the process of online distribution of a musical work. Other categories of rights are the right of communication to the public of musical works and the exclusive right of making a musical work or other subject matter available. The ubiquitous nature of online services makes it necessary to seek solutions to the management of rights at a Community, rather than, national level. The Commission Recommendation, therefore, invites the Member States to foster a regulatory climate, in support of the management of cross-border rights. This Recommendation is addressed to the Member States and to all economic operators involved in the management of copyright and related rights within the Community. The Recommendation has been organised along the following lines: - Establishing various definitions for terms pertinent to the scope of the Recommendation (such as management of copyright and musical works etc.) - The relationship between right-holders, collective rights managers and commercial users. - Equitable distribution and deductions. - Non-discrimination and representation - Accountability and dispute settlements. Member States and collective rights managers are invited to report, on a yearly basis, on measures they have taken in relation to this Recommendation and on the management, at Community level, of copyright and related rights for the provision of legitimate online music services.
  • date: 2005-10-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
  • date: 2006-01-19T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Katalin LEVAI (PES, HU) in response to the Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. MEPs were critical of the Commission's failure to consult interested parties and Parliament before adopting the Recommendation, and also criticised the "soft law" approach. They called on the Commission to propose a framework directive, to be adopted under the codecision procedure, for regulating the collective management of cross-border online music services, "while taking account of the specificity of the digital era and safeguarding European cultural diversity, small stakeholders and local repertoires". The committee stressed that the proposed directive should not in any way undermine the competitiveness of the underlying creative businesses, the effectiveness of the services provided by collective rights managers (CRMs) or the competitiveness of user businesses, in particular small right-holders and users. It therefore called for such a directive to guarantee right-holders a high degree of protection and equal treatment, ensure "comprehensive transparency" in CRMs, promote creativity and cultural diversity, and allow "fair and controlled" competition. MEPs also wanted to avoid the over-centralisation of market powers and repertoires by ensuring that exclusive mandates may not be granted to a single or a very few CRMs by major right-holders. In this way, the global repertoire would remain available to all CRMs for the granting of licences to users. They also said that it was crucial to prohibit any form of exclusive mandate between major right-holders and CRMs for the direct collection of royalties in all Member States, as this would lead to "the rapid extinction of national CRMs and undermine the position of minority repertoires and cultural diversity in Europe". Lastly, the Commission was urged to conduct an assessment of the impact of a global licence for online services and its effects on the economic and social situation of authors.
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-53&language=EN title: A6-0053/2007
  • date: 2007-03-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070312&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13354&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-64 title: T6-0064/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Katalin LEVAI (PES, HU) in response to the Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services. Parliament criticised the Commission for failing to undertake a thorough consultation process with interested parties and with Parliament before adopting the Recommendation. All categories of right-holders must be consulted on any future regulatory activities in this area so as to ensure a fair and balanced representation of interests. Parliament also criticised the "soft law" approach. Parliament felt that the Recommendation was inadequate for the following reasons : - it sought merely to regulate the online sale of music recordings, but could – owing to its imprecise wording – also be applied to other online services (e.g. broadcasting services) containing music recordings; - there was a risk that right-holders complying with the recommendation in respect of their interactive online rights would deprive local collective rights managers (CRMs) of other rights (e.g. those relating to broadcasting), thus preventing users of those rights from acquiring user rights for a diversified repertoire from one and the same CRM ; - national CRMs should continue to play an important role in providing support for the promotion of new and minority right-holders, cultural diversity, creativity and local repertoires, which presupposed that national CRMs should retain the right to charge cultural deductions ; - there was concern about the potentially negative effects of some provisions of the Recommendation on local repertoires and on cultural diversity given the potential risk of favouring a concentration of rights in the bigger CRMs. The impact of any initiative for the introduction of competition between rights managers in attracting the most profitable right-holders must be examined and weighed against the adverse effects of such an approach on smaller right-holders, small and medium-sized CRMs and cultural diversity. Parliament invited the Commission to make it clear that the 2005 Recommendation applied exclusively to online sales of music recordings, and to present a proposal for a flexible framework directive to be adopted by codecision. This should aim at regulating the collective management of copyright and related rights as regards cross-border online music services, while taking account of the specificity of the digital era and safeguarding European cultural diversity, small stakeholders and local repertoires, on the basis of the principle of equal treatment. The Commission's consultation of interested parties should be as broadly based as possible. The proposed directive should not in any way undermine the competitiveness of the underlying creative businesses, the effectiveness of the services provided by CRMs or the competitiveness of user businesses – in particular small right-holders and users – and should: guarantee right-holders a high degree of protection and equal treatment; ensure that legal provisions have a real impact on the effective protection of all categories of right-holders; be based on solidarity and an adequate, equitable balance between right-holders within CRMs; avoid downward pressure on royalty levels by ensuring that users are licensed on the basis of the tariff applicable in the country where the consumption of the copyrighted work (the so-called "country of destination") will take place, and help to achieve an appropriate level of royalties for the right-holders. MEPs also wanted to avoid the over-centralisation of market powers and repertoires by ensuring that exclusive mandates may not be granted to a single or a very few CRMs by major right-holders. In this way, the global repertoire would remain available to all CRMs for the granting of licences to users. They also said that it was crucial to prohibit any form of exclusive mandate between major right-holders and CRMs for the direct collection of royalties in all Member States, as this would lead to the rapid extinction of national CRMs and undermine the position of minority repertoires and cultural diversity in Europe. A CRM should be free to provide commercial users based anywhere in the EU with pan-European and multi-repertoire licences for online uses (including mobile telephony uses), on fair and individually negotiated terms and without discrimination between users. The Commission was urged to conduct an assessment of the impact of a global licence for online services and its effects on the economic and social situation of authors.
  • date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/6/33013
New
  • JURI/6/33013
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.50.15 Intellectual property, copyright
New
3.50.15
Intellectual property, copyright
activities
  • date: 2005-05-18T00:00:00 docs: title: 32005H0737 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:32005H0737:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2005-10-21T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal
  • date: 2006-01-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: LÉVAI Katalin
  • date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: LÉVAI Katalin type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-53&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0053/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-03-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070312&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13354&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-64 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0064/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2006-02-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MAVROMMATIS Manolis
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2005-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: LÉVAI Katalin
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/6/33013
reference
2006/2008(INI)
title
Commission recommendation of 18 May 2005 on collective cross-border management of copyright and related rights for legitimate online music services (recom. 2005/737/EC)
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
3.50.15 Intellectual property, copyright