BETA


2006/2018B(BUD) 2007 budget: other sections

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG GRECH Louis (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion PETI DOBOLYI Alexandra (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE SCHRÖDER Jürgen (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI WALLIS Diana (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion LIBE DEPREZ Gérard (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion INTA ŠŤASTNÝ Peter (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2007/03/16
   Final act published in Official Journal
Details

PURPOSE: final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007.

LEGISLATIVE ACT: 2007/143/EC, Euratom.

CONTENT: the 2007 budget of the European Union was finally adopted on 14 December 2006, in accordance with the budgetary procedure (see summary of Parliament’s resolution of 14/12/2006 in procedure file BUD/2006/2018).

The budget is the first one to be issued under the 2007-2013 financial framework and the first involving the enlarged European Union of 27 Member-States. It supports a new generation of programmes which deal with the main priorities of the Union, namely sustainable growth and employment.

The budget for 2007 amounts to EUR 126.5 billion in commitment appropriations. This represents 1.08% of Community GNI and is an increase of 5% on the 2006 budget.

Payment appropriations amount to EUR 115.5 billion, or 0.99% of GNI. This represents an increase of 7.6% on 2006.

The key priority of the 2007 budget for the European Union remains growth and employment in line with the Lisbon Strategy.

The heading ‘administration’, which includes the expenditure of all the EU institutions, represents 5.5% of the total EU budget and totals almost EUR 7 billion (commitments and payments).

In terms of that expenditure, the budget of the other institutions (European Parliament, Council, Court of Justice, Court of Auditors, European Economic and Social Committee, Committee of the Regions, European Ombudsman and European Data Protection Supervisor) represents 37.1% of the total budget (or EUR 2 577 189 874).

2006/12/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/12/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/11/30
   CSL - Draft budget approved by Council
2006/11/30
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/11/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/11/21
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/10/26
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/10/26
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Louis GRECH (PSE, AT), and approved the budget of the other institutions, whilst refusing to align itself with Council on across-the-board reduction. It recalled that 2007 is the first year of the new financial framework (2007-2013), for which the ceiling of heading 5 (Administrative expenditure) has been set at EUR 7 115 000 000 at current prices but that after Council's decision the draft budget has a margin of EUR 285 190 000 below the ceiling of heading 5 for 2007. It decided to leave a margin under the ceiling of heading 5, and recommended restoring EUR 30 389 840 out of the EUR 47 812 781 reduction made by Council on the budget of the other institutions (excluding the Commission).

Overall, Parliament felt that the principle of budgetary discipline should be applied to all the institutions, but that budgetary requests should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis which would result in a clear and more precise picture of the real needs and priorities of each institution. It expected the institutions to ensure that policies and activities financed by the taxpayers provide real added-value for citizens and that budget appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and cost-effectiveness. It therefore decided to limit the budget increase of 2007 to 4.79%, excluding enlargement costs.

With regard to the buildings policy of the European institutions, Parliament felt that, under normal circumstances, the policy of purchasing buildings should be continued especially since, over the years, this policy has served the European Parliament's interests well. However, the institutions should present for each future acquisition proposal an indication of the additional related costs that would result in the medium term. Parliament recommended the implementation of a policy of multiannual property investment planning instead of an annual plan.

Parliament also felt that it was important to address the policy regarding outsourcing and recruitment of temporary contract workers, in view of the he ever-increasing trend in the hiring of temporary staff in certain technical fields. In the coming years institutions should ensure that a re-deployment policy is an integral part of the planning procedure when preparing the annual estimates, thus ensuring that human resources requested are in line with operational requirements. Parliament agreed with Council's policy to accept all new posts related to enlargement. On the other hand, it did not agree with Council's decision to increase the "standard abatement" to a relatively high level and base it on the current rate of vacant posts.

Parliament recommended forms of cooperation between institutions which are bound to create synergy and contribute towards financial savings and greater efficiency, whilst helping the citizens to better understand the role of the EU in their everyday activity. There needs to be a more harmonised and standard approach when drafting estimates, including clear and precise justifications, as this would facilitate their analysis.

Parliament made several specific demands with regard to each of the institutions, and certain amendments were passed in Plenary session in respect of the Parliament’s own budget.

European Parliament: after careful examination of Parliament's budgetary requirements, Parliament felt that the final level should be set at EUR 1 397 460 174 corresponding to a 5.74% increase over the 2006 budget. It called on the Bureau to re-address the self-imposed ceiling of 20% of heading 5 in the coming years, taking into account the development and consequential requirements of Parliament for 2009 and beyond. It regretted that the budgetary authority has had no feedback from the Administration on its request relating to the minimisation of costs in areas experiencing unnecessary expenditure as a result of having three places of work, recalling that the costs of this geographical dispersion represent approximately 16% of the total expenditure of Parliament. The Administration was requested to submit a report on the number of officials who are required in Strasbourg during the Plenary Session.

With regard to buildings policy, Parliament noted that the Bureau has proposed to enter an additional EUR 19 million in the reserve for buildings over and above the EUR 50 million requested in Parliament's estimates, but felt that the amount of EUR 19 million is not at this stage a realistic requirement. It decided to maintain the EUR 50 million in the reserve for provisional appropriations for buildings to cover the institution's property investment. The Administration was asked, especially after the "Strasbourg experience", to apply more stringent procedures when purchasing buildings, and to draw up a report examining whether it might be feasible to establish a European Building Authority charged with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU Institutions and bodies.

On information policy, Parliament passed an EPP-ED amendment, re-affirming its policy that it should continue its efforts to develop an effective and user-friendly information strategy with the main objective of improving the relationship between the institution and European citizens. This can only be achieved on the basis of a report on a global concept for information and communication with citizens and after analysis of the added value of each information tool.

It noted the Bureau's proposals to release EUR 6 700 000 from the reserve for information and communication policy earmarked for Web TV, and decided maintain the EUR 6 700 000 allocated by the Bureau for Web TV in the reserve, as well as the 5 posts relating to the project, until the prototype, the content and the cost of the project are presented to the budgetary authority for its final decision. Parliament regretted the unnecessary delays in the implementation of the overall improvement of the visitors" programme and reiterated its call for immediate action to resolve the sensitive issue regarding the under-spending of EUR 5 million relating to the programme. It accepted an EPP-ED amendment that the reception of visitors' groups should be done under the best conditions, and it requested the Administration to study carefully practical arrangements such as access to the new Visitors' Centre, the conditions for visiting the Plenary Chamber and the availability of meeting rooms. It agreed with the following Bureau proposals regarding various appropriations on vistors and confirmed the "Citizens Agora" initiative for a trial period.

On enlargement, Parliament confirmed the decision to enter an allocation of EUR 48 million for enlargement related expenditure (Romania and Bulgaria) and called on the Administration to ensure that enlargement-related recruitment processes do not experience the same delays as witnessed in the enlargement to the EU 10.

On the question of multilingualism, Parliament acknowledged its importance for the work of Members and for citizens, and pointed out that it represents approximately 33% of the total expenditure of Parliament. More discipline and control are necessary to administer this service effectively. It approved appropriations for the Irish language (EUR 412,000 for 2007).

On the question of assistance and services to Members, Parliament welcomed the report on the final assessment of the "Raising the game" exercise, and agreed that the main objectives of improving the support provided to Parliament's bodies and Members have, on the whole, been achieved. It gave its full support for the adoption of a real and meaningful statute for Members" assistants.

Other institutions: Parliament’s remaining recommendations with regard to the other institutions conformed largely to those of its competent committee. (Please see the summary of committee proceedings.)

Documents
2006/10/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/10/13
   EP - Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2006/10/13
   EP - Budgetary report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/10/12
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the report by Louis GRECH (PES, MT) on the EU's 2007 draft general budget for the European Parliament, the Council, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor.

In its general remarks, the committee agreed with the Council that "budgetary discipline and productivity gain should constitute key principles for all institutions", but did not support the Council's plans for across-the-board reduction, arguing instead that budgetary requests should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. It was in favour of continuing the policy of purchasing offices and buildings, while warning that this should not be "solely for the sake of acquiring property".

MEPs noted the problems experienced by the institutions in acquiring staff with particular professional skills and the growing trend towards hiring temporary staff and outsourcing certain services. They said that it would be "advisable" to address the policy to be followed by institutions in these areas. The report also highlighted the need to restructure the institutions' translation services, particularly the number and length of texts to be translated, and called on the institutions to present a report on the cost efficiency of their translation services.

The committee also felt that the institutions should provide more information on the performance of their core tasks in order to justify the consumption of their financial resources, and expressed disappointment at the lack of commitment of some institutions to redeploying staff. Finally, it reiterated previous calls for cooperation between the institutions to create synergy and contribute towards financial savings and greater efficiency.

- Section I - Parliament: the Bureau was asked to re-address the self-imposed ceiling of 20% of administrative expenditure (heading 5) in the coming years, "taking into account the development and consequential requirements of Parliament for 2009 and beyond". The committee recalled that the costs of having three places of work accounted for approximately 16% of Parliament's total expenditure and called for a report on the number of officials who are required in Strasbourg during the plenary session. MEPs reaffirmed their commitment to developing "an effective and user-friendly information strategy" to improve the relationship between Parliament and European citizens. They also decided to create two new budget lines for the Visitors' Centre and the Web-TV in order to enhance financial transparency and accountability for these two important areas, and to allocate extra funding for the visitors' programme. On staffing levels, the report said that "a leaner organisational structure has to be created, principally by streamlining new posts, prioritising objectives and the discontinuation of activities which are not core activities". On buildings policy, the committee decided to maintain EUR 50 million in the reserve for provisional appropriations for buildings to cover Parliament's property investment.

- Section IV - Court of Justice : the committee recommended creating 115 permanent posts for Romania and Bulgaria. It also said that the setting of a new Civil Service Tribunal should have helped reduce the congestion in other tribunals and called on the Court of Justice to report before March 2007 on the impact of this new Tribunal in terms of cost for buildings, staff and other expenses.

- Section V - Court of Auditors : the committee recommended creating 41 permanent posts for Romania and Bulgaria. It also restored funding cut by the Council for IT resources.

- Section VI - European Economic and Social Committee: the EESC was asked to produce an annual report on the impact of the advisory work that it performs for Parliament, the Council and the Commission. MEPs also agreed to the creation of 6 permanent posts for Romania and Bulgaria and increased the funding proposed by the Council by 1.12%, excluding the costs related to enlargement.

- Section VII - Committee of the Regions : the committee noted the non-request for new posts related to enlargement to Bulgaria and Romania and increased the funding proposed by the Council by 2.53%, excluding the costs related to enlargement.

- Section VIII(A) - Ombudsman : the committee increased the appropriations proposed by the Council by EUR 150 000 to top up the funding for translation.

- Section VIII(B) - European Data Protection Supervisor : the committee wanted to see more precise estimates, particularly in terms of staff and new requirements. In order to maintain the level of development of the EDPS, MEPs increased the funding proposed by the Council by 38.28% (without taking into account the amending budget).

2006/10/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/10/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/09/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/09/26
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/09/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/09/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/09/05
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/07/17
   CSL - Council draft budget
Details

The Council adopted, by qualified majority, the draft general budget of the other institutions for the financial year 2007. The Council used the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities for 2007, submitted by the Commission, as the basis for establishing the draft budget (refer to the summary dated 15/07/2006). It also drew upon the debates in conciliation (refer to Council activities 17/07/2006).

The draft budget of the other institutions (except the Commission) is characterised by the following elements:

A. Generally:

§ setting an appropriate level for the administrative budget of each institution taking into account their own specificities and their real and justified needs;

§ applying targeted reductions by limiting requested increases to 2% in comparison to 2006 for some types of expenditure such as Information Technology services and by retaining specific decreases on some other individual budget lines taking into account real needs;

§ applying a differentiated rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional cooperation (between 1.5% to 2.5% taking into account the past implementation in 2004 and 2005) on budget lines which have not been subject to specific reductions;

§ increasing the standard flat rate abatement on salaries for most institutions, taking into account their current vacancy rate.

As regards recruitment in relation with the 2004 enlargement, the Council approved a declaration in which it notes with great concern the information provided by the institutions regarding the recruitment process on new posts granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006, in particular regarding the slowing down of the recruitment process in 2006. The Council insists that all efforts should be made by the institutions as well as by EPSO to ensure that the recruitment process is sufficiently and speedily carried forward at every stage in order to occupy the posts granted as soon as possible. It intends to monitor closely the ongoing recruitment process. To this effect, it requests each institution and EPSO to provide quarterly information to the Budgetary Authority on the state of affairs regarding recruitments in relation with the 2004 enlargement. It invites the Secretaries-general of the institutions to present a report on the progress made in this field before its second reading of the 2007 budget in November 2006.

Furthermore, the Council accepts some new posts requested by the institutions for new tasks on the basis of justified needs. It intends to obtain an agreed Budgetary Authority policy on freezing half of the posts becoming vacant in 2007 following the retirement of the incumbent (not including language posts and AD 13 to AD 16 posts) in view of their deletion in the 2008 budget, if the Budgetary Authority were to agree such a policy, a target total of 200 posts is estimated to be affected (Council 24, Commission 170, Court of Justice 1, Court of Auditors 2, European and Social Committee 3).

In the context of this "productivity gains programme for years 2007-2013", the Council made a second statement in which it stresses the need to ensure real productivity gains in the EU administration throughout the new financial framework period. It also recalls the importance of ensuring that institutions' budgetary estimates be based on real, justified and demonstrated needs. Productivity gains should also be brought about by redeployment and reorganisation of the administrative structures of EU institutions, and saving should be achieved, inter alia, through staffing levels, building policy, tendering for utilities and supplies and IT investments.

The Council invites the institutions to present by the end of 2006 a comprehensive outline of the composition of current cost-bases and their plans for assessing and realising gains on administrative costs for the period 2007-2013 including all administrative expenditure.

B. Expenditure authorised by the Council for each institution (except the Commission) :

§ European Parliament - Section I : under the "gentlemen's agreement", the Council included the European Parliament estimate in the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2007 without any changes; the estimate represents an increase of EUR 56 100 000 (+ 4.24%) over the 2006 budget.

§ Council - Section II : EUR 593 528 788, which represents an increase of EUR 1 775 259 (+0.30%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been maintained at 7% as proposed in the PDB, taking into account the current vacancy rate. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 1.7%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on Information Technology, on the SESAME project and on the contingency reserve. As regards staffing, for its section of the budget, the Council approved the creation of 20 new posts for new tasks and 37 posts for enlargement. It also approved the transformations for career development as requested and it accepted the transformation of 13 temporary posts into permanent posts. It rejected the request for a further 39 new posts.

§ Court of Justice - Section IV : EUR 267 585 990, which represents an increase of EUR 17 247 388 (+6.89) over the 2005 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4.5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.2%. As regards staffing, the Council approved the creation of 8 new posts for new tasks, 115 new posts in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria and 2 new posts requested in relation to the translation into Irish. It accepted the transformations for career development as requested. The Council also agreed on the removal of 5 posts. In view of the forthcoming accession of Romania and Bulgaria, it also accepted the appropriations requested for employment of 7 contract agents. However, the Council could not accept the request for 5 other posts.

§ Court of Auditors - Section V : EUR 117 500 271, which represents an increase of EUR 4 303 780 (+3.80%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4.5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on Information Technology. As regards staffing, the Council accepted the creation of 3 new posts for new tasks and a further 41 new posts, as well as the appropriations for employment of contract agents, in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. It approved the transformations for career development as requested. The Council also agreed on the removal of 2 temporary posts.

§ Economic and Social Committee - Section VI : EUR 111 165 227, which represents an increase of EUR 3 180 422 (+2.95%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.3%. Targeted reductions were retained by limiting the increase to 2% in comparison to 2006 on Information Technology and by applying a specific decrease on other expenditure on buildings, taking into account real needs. With regard to staff level, the Council approved the creation of 2 new posts for new tasks, 11 new posts requested in relation to the 2004 enlargement and 6 new posts in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. It approved the transformations for career development as requested.

§ Committee of the Regions - Section VII : EUR 66 520 009, which represents an increase of EUR 3 157 339 (+4.98%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by limiting the increase to 2% in comparison to 2006 on Information Technology and by applying a specific decrease on other expenditure relating to persons working with the institutions, taking into account real needs. With regard to staff levels, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts for new tasks. It accepted the transformations for career development as requested. However, the Council could not accept the request for 6 other posts.

§ European Ombudsman - Section VIII-A : EUR 8 003 447, which represents an increase of EUR 320 909 (+4.18%) over the 2006 budget. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on the National Ombudsmen Biennal Seminar. The Council approved the requested transformations for career development as requested.

§ European Data Protection Supervisor - Section VIII-B : EUR 4 796 880, which represents an increase of EUR 1 213 047 (+33.85%) over the 2006 budget. However, taking into account DAB No. 3/2006, the increase over the 2006 budget is 15.91%. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 1.8% and the rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. With regard to staff levels, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts and rejected the request for any others.

Documents
2006/07/17
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/07/16
   CSL - Council draft budget published
Details

The Council adopted, by qualified majority, the draft general budget of the other institutions for the financial year 2007. The Council used the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities for 2007, submitted by the Commission, as the basis for establishing the draft budget (refer to the summary dated 15/07/2006). It also drew upon the debates in conciliation (refer to Council activities 17/07/2006).

The draft budget of the other institutions (except the Commission) is characterised by the following elements:

A. Generally:

§ setting an appropriate level for the administrative budget of each institution taking into account their own specificities and their real and justified needs;

§ applying targeted reductions by limiting requested increases to 2% in comparison to 2006 for some types of expenditure such as Information Technology services and by retaining specific decreases on some other individual budget lines taking into account real needs;

§ applying a differentiated rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional cooperation (between 1.5% to 2.5% taking into account the past implementation in 2004 and 2005) on budget lines which have not been subject to specific reductions;

§ increasing the standard flat rate abatement on salaries for most institutions, taking into account their current vacancy rate.

As regards recruitment in relation with the 2004 enlargement, the Council approved a declaration in which it notes with great concern the information provided by the institutions regarding the recruitment process on new posts granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006, in particular regarding the slowing down of the recruitment process in 2006. The Council insists that all efforts should be made by the institutions as well as by EPSO to ensure that the recruitment process is sufficiently and speedily carried forward at every stage in order to occupy the posts granted as soon as possible. It intends to monitor closely the ongoing recruitment process. To this effect, it requests each institution and EPSO to provide quarterly information to the Budgetary Authority on the state of affairs regarding recruitments in relation with the 2004 enlargement. It invites the Secretaries-general of the institutions to present a report on the progress made in this field before its second reading of the 2007 budget in November 2006.

Furthermore, the Council accepts some new posts requested by the institutions for new tasks on the basis of justified needs. It intends to obtain an agreed Budgetary Authority policy on freezing half of the posts becoming vacant in 2007 following the retirement of the incumbent (not including language posts and AD 13 to AD 16 posts) in view of their deletion in the 2008 budget, if the Budgetary Authority were to agree such a policy, a target total of 200 posts is estimated to be affected (Council 24, Commission 170, Court of Justice 1, Court of Auditors 2, European and Social Committee 3).

In the context of this "productivity gains programme for years 2007-2013", the Council made a second statement in which it stresses the need to ensure real productivity gains in the EU administration throughout the new financial framework period. It also recalls the importance of ensuring that institutions' budgetary estimates be based on real, justified and demonstrated needs. Productivity gains should also be brought about by redeployment and reorganisation of the administrative structures of EU institutions, and saving should be achieved, inter alia, through staffing levels, building policy, tendering for utilities and supplies and IT investments.

The Council invites the institutions to present by the end of 2006 a comprehensive outline of the composition of current cost-bases and their plans for assessing and realising gains on administrative costs for the period 2007-2013 including all administrative expenditure.

B. Expenditure authorised by the Council for each institution (except the Commission) :

§ European Parliament - Section I : under the "gentlemen's agreement", the Council included the European Parliament estimate in the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2007 without any changes; the estimate represents an increase of EUR 56 100 000 (+ 4.24%) over the 2006 budget.

§ Council - Section II : EUR 593 528 788, which represents an increase of EUR 1 775 259 (+0.30%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been maintained at 7% as proposed in the PDB, taking into account the current vacancy rate. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 1.7%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on Information Technology, on the SESAME project and on the contingency reserve. As regards staffing, for its section of the budget, the Council approved the creation of 20 new posts for new tasks and 37 posts for enlargement. It also approved the transformations for career development as requested and it accepted the transformation of 13 temporary posts into permanent posts. It rejected the request for a further 39 new posts.

§ Court of Justice - Section IV : EUR 267 585 990, which represents an increase of EUR 17 247 388 (+6.89) over the 2005 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4.5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.2%. As regards staffing, the Council approved the creation of 8 new posts for new tasks, 115 new posts in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria and 2 new posts requested in relation to the translation into Irish. It accepted the transformations for career development as requested. The Council also agreed on the removal of 5 posts. In view of the forthcoming accession of Romania and Bulgaria, it also accepted the appropriations requested for employment of 7 contract agents. However, the Council could not accept the request for 5 other posts.

§ Court of Auditors - Section V : EUR 117 500 271, which represents an increase of EUR 4 303 780 (+3.80%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4.5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on Information Technology. As regards staffing, the Council accepted the creation of 3 new posts for new tasks and a further 41 new posts, as well as the appropriations for employment of contract agents, in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. It approved the transformations for career development as requested. The Council also agreed on the removal of 2 temporary posts.

§ Economic and Social Committee - Section VI : EUR 111 165 227, which represents an increase of EUR 3 180 422 (+2.95%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.3%. Targeted reductions were retained by limiting the increase to 2% in comparison to 2006 on Information Technology and by applying a specific decrease on other expenditure on buildings, taking into account real needs. With regard to staff level, the Council approved the creation of 2 new posts for new tasks, 11 new posts requested in relation to the 2004 enlargement and 6 new posts in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. It approved the transformations for career development as requested.

§ Committee of the Regions - Section VII : EUR 66 520 009, which represents an increase of EUR 3 157 339 (+4.98%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by limiting the increase to 2% in comparison to 2006 on Information Technology and by applying a specific decrease on other expenditure relating to persons working with the institutions, taking into account real needs. With regard to staff levels, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts for new tasks. It accepted the transformations for career development as requested. However, the Council could not accept the request for 6 other posts.

§ European Ombudsman - Section VIII-A : EUR 8 003 447, which represents an increase of EUR 320 909 (+4.18%) over the 2006 budget. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on the National Ombudsmen Biennal Seminar. The Council approved the requested transformations for career development as requested.

§ European Data Protection Supervisor - Section VIII-B : EUR 4 796 880, which represents an increase of EUR 1 213 047 (+33.85%) over the 2006 budget. However, taking into account DAB No. 3/2006, the increase over the 2006 budget is 15.91%. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 1.8% and the rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. With regard to staff levels, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts and rejected the request for any others.

Documents
2006/07/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/06/15
   EC - Commission preliminary draft budget
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) of the European Communities for the year 2007 (Budget “other sections”).

CONTENT : the European Commission has presented its PDB 2007 including the provisional amounts for all the other institutions of the Union (except Section III-Commission).

The PDB 2007 comprises the following budgetary provisions: EUR 3 270 million for administrative expenditure of the Commission and EUR 2 643 million for the other institutions .

For Heading 5, the total for commitment and payments increase by 6 % to EUR 7 002,3 million and EUR 7 002,2 million , respectively which represents and an increase of EUR 399 million compared to 2006.

The margin under this heading amounts to EUR 112.7 million.

Heading 5 of the PDB 2007 can broken down as follows:

- 46.7% for the Commission (excluding pensions), that is EUR 3 270 million;

- 37.7% : for the other institutions, that is EUR 2 643 million including:

§ European Parliament : EUR 1 378 million;

§ Counc il : EUR 613 million;

§ Court of Justice : EUR 282.7 million;

§ Court of Auditors : EUR 122.5 million;

§ Economic and Social Committee : EUR 115.9 million;

§ Committee of the Regions : EUR 69.4 million;

§ European Ombudsman : EUR 8.3 million;

§ European Data -protection supervisor: EUR 5 million.

- 13.7% : for pensions (all institutions), that is EUR 960 million;

- 1.9% : for expenditure relating to European schools, that is EUR 130 million.

Total 7 002 million for heading 5.

Lastly, it should be noted that in 2007, the evolution of posts is again strongly influenced by the needs of enlargement. In total 853 posts are requested by the Commission, complemented by 50 external staff. Added together, this request represents an increase of 4 % in the Commission staff.

2006/06/14
   EC - Commission preliminary draft budget published
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) of the European Communities for the year 2007 (Budget “other sections”).

CONTENT : the European Commission has presented its PDB 2007 including the provisional amounts for all the other institutions of the Union (except Section III-Commission).

The PDB 2007 comprises the following budgetary provisions: EUR 3 270 million for administrative expenditure of the Commission and EUR 2 643 million for the other institutions .

For Heading 5, the total for commitment and payments increase by 6 % to EUR 7 002,3 million and EUR 7 002,2 million , respectively which represents and an increase of EUR 399 million compared to 2006.

The margin under this heading amounts to EUR 112.7 million.

Heading 5 of the PDB 2007 can broken down as follows:

- 46.7% for the Commission (excluding pensions), that is EUR 3 270 million;

- 37.7% : for the other institutions, that is EUR 2 643 million including:

§ European Parliament : EUR 1 378 million;

§ Counc il : EUR 613 million;

§ Court of Justice : EUR 282.7 million;

§ Court of Auditors : EUR 122.5 million;

§ Economic and Social Committee : EUR 115.9 million;

§ Committee of the Regions : EUR 69.4 million;

§ European Ombudsman : EUR 8.3 million;

§ European Data -protection supervisor: EUR 5 million.

- 13.7% : for pensions (all institutions), that is EUR 960 million;

- 1.9% : for expenditure relating to European schools, that is EUR 130 million.

Total 7 002 million for heading 5.

Lastly, it should be noted that in 2007, the evolution of posts is again strongly influenced by the needs of enlargement. In total 853 posts are requested by the Commission, complemented by 50 external staff. Added together, this request represents an increase of 4 % in the Commission staff.

2006/05/02
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

This Commission document concerns the maximum rate of increase for “non-compulsory” expenditure for the 2007 budget. It states that , in accordance with Article 272(9) of the EC Treaty, the maximum rate of increase shall be:

3.4% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States; 3.6% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States and Bulgaria; 4.0% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States and Romania;

4.2% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States, Bulgaria and Romania

2006/03/21
   EP - DOBOLYI Alexandra (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in PETI
2006/03/14
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted the following conclusions, which will serve as the basis for discussions with the European Parliament and the Commission on preparation of the EU's general budget for 2007.

The Council underlines the fact that the budgetary procedure for 2007 will be marked by two important elements:

§ the new Financial Perspective for 2007-2013 to be agreed;

§ the forthcoming accession of two countries to the EU to be confirmed. This should clearly be reflected in the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) for 2007.

It reaffirms the importance of maintaining a framework of overall budget discipline and reiterates its wish that the EU budget for 2007 should provide sufficient resources to implement the various policies of the EU effectively and efficiently. It emphasises that it should apply the same degree of budgetary constraint as exercised by the Member States of the EU for their own national budgets.

The Council is convinced of the importance of good collaboration between the two arms of the Budgetary Authority and the Commission, and looks forward to establishing a good spirit of cooperation for the 2007 budget procedure.

The Council confirms that the forthcoming Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and improvement of budgetary procedure covering the period 2007-2013 will constitute the basis for establishing the budget for 2007. It recalls its constant willingness to apply the IIA to the full. It lays great emphasis on compliance with the Financial Perspective, which requires that Community expenditure remains within the annual limits to be set therein.

It emphasises that the appropriations for 2007 should reflect real and well-defined needs and be compatible with the ceilings set in the Financial Perspective. Absorption capacity and past implementation should also be taken into account when establishing appropriations. It considers that all appropriations need to be reviewed in detail for each policy sector and in this context it reaffirms the importance of reallocation in order to allow the Budgetary Authority to make the necessary financial adaptations to meet present and future needs. For this purpose it points to the necessity of having high quality Activity Statements and financial information on spending proposals in good time.

As regards the budget of the other institutions, the Council considers it important that institutional effectiveness is an increasingly important factor when allocating administrative resources. Savings and

rationalisation benefits due to yearly growth in productivity and economies of scale should also be taken into account when setting the level of administrative spending. The objective should be to achieve a substantial efficiency gain mainly by further development of interinstitutional cooperation and targeted measures. It should also be achieved by redeployment and reorganisation of administrative structures of EU institutions. This would give a signal of improved efficiency to the EU citizens.

It invites the Institutions to present during the budget procedure for 2007 their plans for assessing and realising gains on administrative costs for the period 2007-2013 including all administrative expenditure.

Lastly, it recalls the importance that the institutions should ensure that the recruitment process in the context of the enlargement is carried forward without delay.

2006/03/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/02/23
   EP - WALLIS Diana (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2006/02/22
   EP - DEPREZ Gérard (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2006/01/25
   EP - SCHRÖDER Jürgen (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2006/01/25
   EP - ŠŤASTNÝ Peter (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2006/01/11
   EP - GRECH Louis (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Grech A6-0356/2006 - am. 3 #

2006/10/26 Outcome: +: 282, -: 270, 0: 6
DE PL CZ IE SK HU EL CY LU SI IT LV SE MT DK NL AT EE ES LT PT FI GB BE FR
Total
83
45
22
12
11
19
20
5
4
5
43
4
13
4
5
22
13
5
44
8
19
12
55
21
64
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
210

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
17

Italy UEN

2

Latvia UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
15

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

4

France IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
155

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Sweden PSE

3

Estonia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Grech A6-0356/2006 - par. 23 #

2006/10/26 Outcome: +: 520, -: 31, 0: 2
DE FR PL GB ES IT NL EL HU PT BE AT IE FI SK LT SE SI CY EE LV DK MT LU CZ
Total
83
63
47
57
44
42
22
20
18
20
19
13
12
12
11
8
10
5
5
5
4
4
4
4
21
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
205

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Sweden PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
156

Ireland PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
3

Estonia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
18

Italy UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
15

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
5

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Belgium NI

3

Slovakia NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Rapport Grech A6-0356/2006 - am. 4 #

2006/10/26 Outcome: +: 304, -: 248, 0: 6
DE PL CZ HU EL IE SK SE CY IT PT SI LU LV MT DK LT EE ES FI AT GB NL BE FR
Total
81
46
21
19
20
12
11
13
5
44
19
5
5
4
4
5
7
5
44
12
14
57
21
21
63
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
210

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

1

Austria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
17

Italy UEN

2

Latvia UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
16

Poland IND/DEM

3

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1
5

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Hungary ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (2)

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2
2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
155

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Sweden PSE

For (1)

3

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1
date
2006-09-05T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.433
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/1
date
2006-06-15T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Commission preliminary draft budget
body
EC
docs/2
date
2006-09-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.335
committee
PETI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2006-07-17T00:00:00
docs
url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11675%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11675/2006
summary
type
Council draft budget
body
CSL
docs/3
date
2006-09-05T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.433
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3
date
2006-09-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.365
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-376433_EN.html
docs/4
date
2006-09-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.335
committee
PETI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-AD-376335_EN.html
docs/5
date
2006-09-13T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.365
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5
date
2006-10-03T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.788
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-376365_EN.html
docs/7
date
2006-10-03T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.788
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-376788_EN.html
docs/8
date
2006-11-23T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)5316-2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/10
date
2006-11-23T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)5316-2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/10/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12727&j=0&l=en
events/1/date
Old
2006-06-15T00:00:00
New
2006-06-14T00:00:00
events/2/date
Old
2006-07-17T00:00:00
New
2006-07-16T00:00:00
events/12/docs/0/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32007B0143(1)
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:[%SECTOR]2006[%DESCRIPTOR]3200701431:EN:NOT
procedure/final/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32007B0143(1)
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:[%SECTOR]2006[%DESCRIPTOR]3200701431:EN:NOT
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.433&secondRef=03
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.335
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.365&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.811
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.811
docs/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.788&secondRef=02
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.843
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.843
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0356_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0356_EN.html
docs/8/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=12727&j=0&l=en
events/3/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/5
date
2006-10-13T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0356_EN.html title: A6-0356/2006
events/5
date
2006-10-13T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0356_EN.html title: A6-0356/2006
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE
events/8
date
2006-10-26T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0452_EN.html title: T6-0452/2006
summary
events/8
date
2006-10-26T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0452_EN.html title: T6-0452/2006
summary
events/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061212&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061212&type=CRE
events/12/docs
  • title: Budget 2007/143 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32007B0143(1)
  • title: OJ L 077 16.03.2007, p. 0001 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2007:077:TOC
procedure/final/title
Old
OJ L 077 16.03.2007, p. 0001
New
Budget 2007/143
procedure/final/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2007:077:TOC
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexapi!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&model=guicheti&numdoc=32007B0143(1)
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: GRECH Louis date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2006-01-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRECH Louis group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: ŠŤASTNÝ Peter date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ŠŤASTNÝ Peter group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: WALLIS Diana date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2006-02-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WALLIS Diana group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: DEPREZ Gérard date: 2006-02-22T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2006-02-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DEPREZ Gérard group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
rapporteur
name: DOBOLYI Alexandra date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
date
2006-03-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DOBOLYI Alexandra group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-356&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0356_EN.html
docs/8/body
EC
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-356&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0356_EN.html
events/8/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-452
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0452_EN.html
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: GRYBAUSKAITĖ Dalia
committees
  • type: Responsible Committee body: EP associated: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: GRECH Louis group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: ŠŤASTNÝ Peter group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI date: 2006-02-23T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: WALLIS Diana group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE date: 2006-02-22T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: DEPREZ Gérard group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM opinion: False
  • type: Committee Opinion body: EP associated: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 rapporteur: name: DOBOLYI Alexandra group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs meeting_id: 2767 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2767*&MEET_DATE=30/11/2006 date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2764 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2764*&MEET_DATE=21/11/2006 date: 2006-11-21T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2743 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2743*&MEET_DATE=17/07/2006 date: 2006-07-17T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2742 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2742*&MEET_DATE=14/07/2006 date: 2006-07-14T00:00:00
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2716 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2716*&MEET_DATE=14/03/2006 date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2006-05-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0558/COM_SEC(2006)0558_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)0558 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=558 title: EUR-Lex summary: This Commission document concerns the maximum rate of increase for “non-compulsory” expenditure for the 2007 budget. It states that , in accordance with Article 272(9) of the EC Treaty, the maximum rate of increase shall be: 3.4% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States; 3.6% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States and Bulgaria; 4.0% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States and Romania; 4.2% for the 2007 budget with the current 25 Member States, Bulgaria and Romania type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-09-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.433&secondRef=03 title: PE376.433 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.335 title: PE376.335 committee: PETI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.365&secondRef=02 title: PE376.365 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-09-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.811 title: PE378.811 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.788&secondRef=02 title: PE376.788 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.843 title: PE378.843 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-356&language=EN title: A6-0356/2006 type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=12727&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)5316-2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted the following conclusions, which will serve as the basis for discussions with the European Parliament and the Commission on preparation of the EU's general budget for 2007. The Council underlines the fact that the budgetary procedure for 2007 will be marked by two important elements: § the new Financial Perspective for 2007-2013 to be agreed; § the forthcoming accession of two countries to the EU to be confirmed. This should clearly be reflected in the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) for 2007. It reaffirms the importance of maintaining a framework of overall budget discipline and reiterates its wish that the EU budget for 2007 should provide sufficient resources to implement the various policies of the EU effectively and efficiently. It emphasises that it should apply the same degree of budgetary constraint as exercised by the Member States of the EU for their own national budgets. The Council is convinced of the importance of good collaboration between the two arms of the Budgetary Authority and the Commission, and looks forward to establishing a good spirit of cooperation for the 2007 budget procedure. The Council confirms that the forthcoming Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and improvement of budgetary procedure covering the period 2007-2013 will constitute the basis for establishing the budget for 2007. It recalls its constant willingness to apply the IIA to the full. It lays great emphasis on compliance with the Financial Perspective, which requires that Community expenditure remains within the annual limits to be set therein. It emphasises that the appropriations for 2007 should reflect real and well-defined needs and be compatible with the ceilings set in the Financial Perspective. Absorption capacity and past implementation should also be taken into account when establishing appropriations. It considers that all appropriations need to be reviewed in detail for each policy sector and in this context it reaffirms the importance of reallocation in order to allow the Budgetary Authority to make the necessary financial adaptations to meet present and future needs. For this purpose it points to the necessity of having high quality Activity Statements and financial information on spending proposals in good time. As regards the budget of the other institutions, the Council considers it important that institutional effectiveness is an increasingly important factor when allocating administrative resources. Savings and rationalisation benefits due to yearly growth in productivity and economies of scale should also be taken into account when setting the level of administrative spending. The objective should be to achieve a substantial efficiency gain mainly by further development of interinstitutional cooperation and targeted measures. It should also be achieved by redeployment and reorganisation of administrative structures of EU institutions. This would give a signal of improved efficiency to the EU citizens. It invites the Institutions to present during the budget procedure for 2007 their plans for assessing and realising gains on administrative costs for the period 2007-2013 including all administrative expenditure. Lastly, it recalls the importance that the institutions should ensure that the recruitment process in the context of the enlargement is carried forward without delay.
  • date: 2006-06-15T00:00:00 type: Commission preliminary draft budget published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=531 title: EUR-Lex title: SEC(2006)0531 summary: PURPOSE : to present the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) of the European Communities for the year 2007 (Budget “other sections”). CONTENT : the European Commission has presented its PDB 2007 including the provisional amounts for all the other institutions of the Union (except Section III-Commission). The PDB 2007 comprises the following budgetary provisions: EUR 3 270 million for administrative expenditure of the Commission and EUR 2 643 million for the other institutions . For Heading 5, the total for commitment and payments increase by 6 % to EUR 7 002,3 million and EUR 7 002,2 million , respectively which represents and an increase of EUR 399 million compared to 2006. The margin under this heading amounts to EUR 112.7 million. Heading 5 of the PDB 2007 can broken down as follows: - 46.7% for the Commission (excluding pensions), that is EUR 3 270 million; - 37.7% : for the other institutions, that is EUR 2 643 million including: § European Parliament : EUR 1 378 million; § Counc il : EUR 613 million; § Court of Justice : EUR 282.7 million; § Court of Auditors : EUR 122.5 million; § Economic and Social Committee : EUR 115.9 million; § Committee of the Regions : EUR 69.4 million; § European Ombudsman : EUR 8.3 million; § European Data -protection supervisor: EUR 5 million. - 13.7% : for pensions (all institutions), that is EUR 960 million; - 1.9% : for expenditure relating to European schools, that is EUR 130 million. Total 7 002 million for heading 5. Lastly, it should be noted that in 2007, the evolution of posts is again strongly influenced by the needs of enlargement. In total 853 posts are requested by the Commission, complemented by 50 external staff. Added together, this request represents an increase of 4 % in the Commission staff.
  • date: 2006-07-17T00:00:00 type: Council draft budget published body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=11675%2F06&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC title: 11675/2006 summary: The Council adopted, by qualified majority, the draft general budget of the other institutions for the financial year 2007. The Council used the preliminary draft budget of the European Communities for 2007, submitted by the Commission, as the basis for establishing the draft budget (refer to the summary dated 15/07/2006). It also drew upon the debates in conciliation (refer to Council activities 17/07/2006). The draft budget of the other institutions (except the Commission) is characterised by the following elements: A. Generally: § setting an appropriate level for the administrative budget of each institution taking into account their own specificities and their real and justified needs; § applying targeted reductions by limiting requested increases to 2% in comparison to 2006 for some types of expenditure such as Information Technology services and by retaining specific decreases on some other individual budget lines taking into account real needs; § applying a differentiated rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional cooperation (between 1.5% to 2.5% taking into account the past implementation in 2004 and 2005) on budget lines which have not been subject to specific reductions; § increasing the standard flat rate abatement on salaries for most institutions, taking into account their current vacancy rate. As regards recruitment in relation with the 2004 enlargement, the Council approved a declaration in which it notes with great concern the information provided by the institutions regarding the recruitment process on new posts granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006, in particular regarding the slowing down of the recruitment process in 2006. The Council insists that all efforts should be made by the institutions as well as by EPSO to ensure that the recruitment process is sufficiently and speedily carried forward at every stage in order to occupy the posts granted as soon as possible. It intends to monitor closely the ongoing recruitment process. To this effect, it requests each institution and EPSO to provide quarterly information to the Budgetary Authority on the state of affairs regarding recruitments in relation with the 2004 enlargement. It invites the Secretaries-general of the institutions to present a report on the progress made in this field before its second reading of the 2007 budget in November 2006. Furthermore, the Council accepts some new posts requested by the institutions for new tasks on the basis of justified needs. It intends to obtain an agreed Budgetary Authority policy on freezing half of the posts becoming vacant in 2007 following the retirement of the incumbent (not including language posts and AD 13 to AD 16 posts) in view of their deletion in the 2008 budget, if the Budgetary Authority were to agree such a policy, a target total of 200 posts is estimated to be affected (Council 24, Commission 170, Court of Justice 1, Court of Auditors 2, European and Social Committee 3). In the context of this "productivity gains programme for years 2007-2013", the Council made a second statement in which it stresses the need to ensure real productivity gains in the EU administration throughout the new financial framework period. It also recalls the importance of ensuring that institutions' budgetary estimates be based on real, justified and demonstrated needs. Productivity gains should also be brought about by redeployment and reorganisation of the administrative structures of EU institutions, and saving should be achieved, inter alia, through staffing levels, building policy, tendering for utilities and supplies and IT investments. The Council invites the institutions to present by the end of 2006 a comprehensive outline of the composition of current cost-bases and their plans for assessing and realising gains on administrative costs for the period 2007-2013 including all administrative expenditure. B. Expenditure authorised by the Council for each institution (except the Commission) : § European Parliament - Section I : under the "gentlemen's agreement", the Council included the European Parliament estimate in the draft general budget of the European Communities for the financial year 2007 without any changes; the estimate represents an increase of EUR 56 100 000 (+ 4.24%) over the 2006 budget. § Council - Section II : EUR 593 528 788, which represents an increase of EUR 1 775 259 (+0.30%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been maintained at 7% as proposed in the PDB, taking into account the current vacancy rate. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 1.7%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on Information Technology, on the SESAME project and on the contingency reserve. As regards staffing, for its section of the budget, the Council approved the creation of 20 new posts for new tasks and 37 posts for enlargement. It also approved the transformations for career development as requested and it accepted the transformation of 13 temporary posts into permanent posts. It rejected the request for a further 39 new posts. § Court of Justice - Section IV : EUR 267 585 990, which represents an increase of EUR 17 247 388 (+6.89) over the 2005 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4.5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.2%. As regards staffing, the Council approved the creation of 8 new posts for new tasks, 115 new posts in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria and 2 new posts requested in relation to the translation into Irish. It accepted the transformations for career development as requested. The Council also agreed on the removal of 5 posts. In view of the forthcoming accession of Romania and Bulgaria, it also accepted the appropriations requested for employment of 7 contract agents. However, the Council could not accept the request for 5 other posts. § Court of Auditors - Section V : EUR 117 500 271, which represents an increase of EUR 4 303 780 (+3.80%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4.5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on Information Technology. As regards staffing, the Council accepted the creation of 3 new posts for new tasks and a further 41 new posts, as well as the appropriations for employment of contract agents, in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. It approved the transformations for career development as requested. The Council also agreed on the removal of 2 temporary posts. § Economic and Social Committee - Section VI : EUR 111 165 227, which represents an increase of EUR 3 180 422 (+2.95%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 4%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.3%. Targeted reductions were retained by limiting the increase to 2% in comparison to 2006 on Information Technology and by applying a specific decrease on other expenditure on buildings, taking into account real needs. With regard to staff level, the Council approved the creation of 2 new posts for new tasks, 11 new posts requested in relation to the 2004 enlargement and 6 new posts in view of the enlargement to Romania and Bulgaria. It approved the transformations for career development as requested. § Committee of the Regions - Section VII : EUR 66 520 009, which represents an increase of EUR 3 157 339 (+4.98%) over the 2006 budget. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 5%. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by limiting the increase to 2% in comparison to 2006 on Information Technology and by applying a specific decrease on other expenditure relating to persons working with the institutions, taking into account real needs. With regard to staff levels, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts for new tasks. It accepted the transformations for career development as requested. However, the Council could not accept the request for 6 other posts. § European Ombudsman - Section VIII-A : EUR 8 003 447, which represents an increase of EUR 320 909 (+4.18%) over the 2006 budget. The rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. Targeted reductions were retained by applying a specific decrease on the National Ombudsmen Biennal Seminar. The Council approved the requested transformations for career development as requested. § European Data Protection Supervisor - Section VIII-B : EUR 4 796 880, which represents an increase of EUR 1 213 047 (+33.85%) over the 2006 budget. However, taking into account DAB No. 3/2006, the increase over the 2006 budget is 15.91%. The standard flat rate abatement on salaries has been fixed at 1.8% and the rate of reduction on current expenditure related to productivity gains and the impact of interinstitutional co-operation has been fixed at 2.5%. With regard to staff levels, the Council approved the creation of 3 new posts and rejected the request for any others.
  • date: 2006-09-26T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by Louis GRECH (PES, MT) on the EU's 2007 draft general budget for the European Parliament, the Council, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor. In its general remarks, the committee agreed with the Council that "budgetary discipline and productivity gain should constitute key principles for all institutions", but did not support the Council's plans for across-the-board reduction, arguing instead that budgetary requests should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. It was in favour of continuing the policy of purchasing offices and buildings, while warning that this should not be "solely for the sake of acquiring property". MEPs noted the problems experienced by the institutions in acquiring staff with particular professional skills and the growing trend towards hiring temporary staff and outsourcing certain services. They said that it would be "advisable" to address the policy to be followed by institutions in these areas. The report also highlighted the need to restructure the institutions' translation services, particularly the number and length of texts to be translated, and called on the institutions to present a report on the cost efficiency of their translation services. The committee also felt that the institutions should provide more information on the performance of their core tasks in order to justify the consumption of their financial resources, and expressed disappointment at the lack of commitment of some institutions to redeploying staff. Finally, it reiterated previous calls for cooperation between the institutions to create synergy and contribute towards financial savings and greater efficiency. - Section I - Parliament: the Bureau was asked to re-address the self-imposed ceiling of 20% of administrative expenditure (heading 5) in the coming years, "taking into account the development and consequential requirements of Parliament for 2009 and beyond". The committee recalled that the costs of having three places of work accounted for approximately 16% of Parliament's total expenditure and called for a report on the number of officials who are required in Strasbourg during the plenary session. MEPs reaffirmed their commitment to developing "an effective and user-friendly information strategy" to improve the relationship between Parliament and European citizens. They also decided to create two new budget lines for the Visitors' Centre and the Web-TV in order to enhance financial transparency and accountability for these two important areas, and to allocate extra funding for the visitors' programme. On staffing levels, the report said that "a leaner organisational structure has to be created, principally by streamlining new posts, prioritising objectives and the discontinuation of activities which are not core activities". On buildings policy, the committee decided to maintain EUR 50 million in the reserve for provisional appropriations for buildings to cover Parliament's property investment. - Section IV - Court of Justice : the committee recommended creating 115 permanent posts for Romania and Bulgaria. It also said that the setting of a new Civil Service Tribunal should have helped reduce the congestion in other tribunals and called on the Court of Justice to report before March 2007 on the impact of this new Tribunal in terms of cost for buildings, staff and other expenses. - Section V - Court of Auditors : the committee recommended creating 41 permanent posts for Romania and Bulgaria. It also restored funding cut by the Council for IT resources. - Section VI - European Economic and Social Committee: the EESC was asked to produce an annual report on the impact of the advisory work that it performs for Parliament, the Council and the Commission. MEPs also agreed to the creation of 6 permanent posts for Romania and Bulgaria and increased the funding proposed by the Council by 1.12%, excluding the costs related to enlargement. - Section VII - Committee of the Regions : the committee noted the non-request for new posts related to enlargement to Bulgaria and Romania and increased the funding proposed by the Council by 2.53%, excluding the costs related to enlargement. - Section VIII(A) - Ombudsman : the committee increased the appropriations proposed by the Council by EUR 150 000 to top up the funding for translation. - Section VIII(B) - European Data Protection Supervisor : the committee wanted to see more precise estimates, particularly in terms of staff and new requirements. In order to maintain the level of development of the EDPS, MEPs increased the funding proposed by the Council by 38.28% (without taking into account the amending budget).
  • date: 2006-10-13T00:00:00 type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-356&language=EN title: A6-0356/2006
  • date: 2006-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-10-26T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12727&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-10-26T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-452 title: T6-0452/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by Louis GRECH (PSE, AT), and approved the budget of the other institutions, whilst refusing to align itself with Council on across-the-board reduction. It recalled that 2007 is the first year of the new financial framework (2007-2013), for which the ceiling of heading 5 (Administrative expenditure) has been set at EUR 7 115 000 000 at current prices but that after Council's decision the draft budget has a margin of EUR 285 190 000 below the ceiling of heading 5 for 2007. It decided to leave a margin under the ceiling of heading 5, and recommended restoring EUR 30 389 840 out of the EUR 47 812 781 reduction made by Council on the budget of the other institutions (excluding the Commission). Overall, Parliament felt that the principle of budgetary discipline should be applied to all the institutions, but that budgetary requests should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis which would result in a clear and more precise picture of the real needs and priorities of each institution. It expected the institutions to ensure that policies and activities financed by the taxpayers provide real added-value for citizens and that budget appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management and cost-effectiveness. It therefore decided to limit the budget increase of 2007 to 4.79%, excluding enlargement costs. With regard to the buildings policy of the European institutions, Parliament felt that, under normal circumstances, the policy of purchasing buildings should be continued especially since, over the years, this policy has served the European Parliament's interests well. However, the institutions should present for each future acquisition proposal an indication of the additional related costs that would result in the medium term. Parliament recommended the implementation of a policy of multiannual property investment planning instead of an annual plan. Parliament also felt that it was important to address the policy regarding outsourcing and recruitment of temporary contract workers, in view of the he ever-increasing trend in the hiring of temporary staff in certain technical fields. In the coming years institutions should ensure that a re-deployment policy is an integral part of the planning procedure when preparing the annual estimates, thus ensuring that human resources requested are in line with operational requirements. Parliament agreed with Council's policy to accept all new posts related to enlargement. On the other hand, it did not agree with Council's decision to increase the "standard abatement" to a relatively high level and base it on the current rate of vacant posts. Parliament recommended forms of cooperation between institutions which are bound to create synergy and contribute towards financial savings and greater efficiency, whilst helping the citizens to better understand the role of the EU in their everyday activity. There needs to be a more harmonised and standard approach when drafting estimates, including clear and precise justifications, as this would facilitate their analysis. Parliament made several specific demands with regard to each of the institutions, and certain amendments were passed in Plenary session in respect of the Parliament’s own budget. European Parliament: after careful examination of Parliament's budgetary requirements, Parliament felt that the final level should be set at EUR 1 397 460 174 corresponding to a 5.74% increase over the 2006 budget. It called on the Bureau to re-address the self-imposed ceiling of 20% of heading 5 in the coming years, taking into account the development and consequential requirements of Parliament for 2009 and beyond. It regretted that the budgetary authority has had no feedback from the Administration on its request relating to the minimisation of costs in areas experiencing unnecessary expenditure as a result of having three places of work, recalling that the costs of this geographical dispersion represent approximately 16% of the total expenditure of Parliament. The Administration was requested to submit a report on the number of officials who are required in Strasbourg during the Plenary Session. With regard to buildings policy, Parliament noted that the Bureau has proposed to enter an additional EUR 19 million in the reserve for buildings over and above the EUR 50 million requested in Parliament's estimates, but felt that the amount of EUR 19 million is not at this stage a realistic requirement. It decided to maintain the EUR 50 million in the reserve for provisional appropriations for buildings to cover the institution's property investment. The Administration was asked, especially after the "Strasbourg experience", to apply more stringent procedures when purchasing buildings, and to draw up a report examining whether it might be feasible to establish a European Building Authority charged with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU Institutions and bodies. On information policy, Parliament passed an EPP-ED amendment, re-affirming its policy that it should continue its efforts to develop an effective and user-friendly information strategy with the main objective of improving the relationship between the institution and European citizens. This can only be achieved on the basis of a report on a global concept for information and communication with citizens and after analysis of the added value of each information tool. It noted the Bureau's proposals to release EUR 6 700 000 from the reserve for information and communication policy earmarked for Web TV, and decided maintain the EUR 6 700 000 allocated by the Bureau for Web TV in the reserve, as well as the 5 posts relating to the project, until the prototype, the content and the cost of the project are presented to the budgetary authority for its final decision. Parliament regretted the unnecessary delays in the implementation of the overall improvement of the visitors" programme and reiterated its call for immediate action to resolve the sensitive issue regarding the under-spending of EUR 5 million relating to the programme. It accepted an EPP-ED amendment that the reception of visitors' groups should be done under the best conditions, and it requested the Administration to study carefully practical arrangements such as access to the new Visitors' Centre, the conditions for visiting the Plenary Chamber and the availability of meeting rooms. It agreed with the following Bureau proposals regarding various appropriations on vistors and confirmed the "Citizens Agora" initiative for a trial period. On enlargement, Parliament confirmed the decision to enter an allocation of EUR 48 million for enlargement related expenditure (Romania and Bulgaria) and called on the Administration to ensure that enlargement-related recruitment processes do not experience the same delays as witnessed in the enlargement to the EU 10. On the question of multilingualism, Parliament acknowledged its importance for the work of Members and for citizens, and pointed out that it represents approximately 33% of the total expenditure of Parliament. More discipline and control are necessary to administer this service effectively. It approved appropriations for the Irish language (EUR 412,000 for 2007). On the question of assistance and services to Members, Parliament welcomed the report on the final assessment of the "Raising the game" exercise, and agreed that the main objectives of improving the support provided to Parliament's bodies and Members have, on the whole, been achieved. It gave its full support for the adoption of a real and meaningful statute for Members" assistants. Other institutions: Parliament’s remaining recommendations with regard to the other institutions conformed largely to those of its competent committee. (Please see the summary of committee proceedings.)
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: Draft budget approved by Council body: CSL
  • date: 2006-12-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061212&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-12-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2007-03-16T00:00:00 type: Final act published in Official Journal summary: PURPOSE: final adoption of the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2007. LEGISLATIVE ACT: 2007/143/EC, Euratom. CONTENT: the 2007 budget of the European Union was finally adopted on 14 December 2006, in accordance with the budgetary procedure (see summary of Parliament’s resolution of 14/12/2006 in procedure file BUD/2006/2018). The budget is the first one to be issued under the 2007-2013 financial framework and the first involving the enlarged European Union of 27 Member-States. It supports a new generation of programmes which deal with the main priorities of the Union, namely sustainable growth and employment. The budget for 2007 amounts to EUR 126.5 billion in commitment appropriations. This represents 1.08% of Community GNI and is an increase of 5% on the 2006 budget. Payment appropriations amount to EUR 115.5 billion, or 0.99% of GNI. This represents an increase of 7.6% on 2006. The key priority of the 2007 budget for the European Union remains growth and employment in line with the Lisbon Strategy. The heading ‘administration’, which includes the expenditure of all the EU institutions, represents 5.5% of the total EU budget and totals almost EUR 7 billion (commitments and payments). In terms of that expenditure, the budget of the other institutions (European Parliament, Council, Court of Justice, Court of Auditors, European Economic and Social Committee, Committee of the Regions, European Ombudsman and European Data Protection Supervisor) represents 37.1% of the total budget (or EUR 2 577 189 874).
procedure
reference
2006/2018B(BUD)
title
2007 budget: other sections
subject
type
BUD - Budgetary procedure
subtype
Budget
stage_reached
Procedure completed
dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/6/33278
final