BETA


2006/2020(BUD) 2007 budget: Commission's annual strategic priorities

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG ELLES James (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE SCHRÖDER Jürgen (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion AFET SZENT-IVÁNYI István (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion LIBE
Committee Opinion INTA MARTIN David (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM
Lead committee dossier:

Events

2006/08/01
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/06/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/05/18
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/05/18
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by James ELLES (EPP-ED, UK) on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy for 2007.

Context: Parliament e xpressed concern about the visible discrepancy between the challenges which the EU is facing and the appropriations that might be available under the relevant headings of an unambitious Multi-Annual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013 to respond effectively to these challenges, in particular for competitiveness, research and innovation, which the Council and Commission had themselves labelled as priorities. The Annual Policy Strategy did not reflect the urgency with which such challenges should be addressed or provide the necessary vision for encouraging economic reform to meet them. Parliament noted the Commission's strategic objectives as set out in its APS document "Boosting trust through action", but strongly criticised the Commission for its complacency and laid back attitude in setting out the nature of the challenges facing the EU. It believed, for example, that insufficient attention had been given by the Commission to the vast and very rapid changes underway in the global economy, notably in emerging economies such as China and India.

For the 2007 budget, the three main strands should be setting policy priorities; ensuring qualitative value for money; and beginning preparations for the review in 2008/2009, this because the 2007 budget and its implementation will enable the effectiveness of the new MFF to be assessed.

Setting Policy Priorities

External Relations – Europe as a world partner: Parliament spoke of the crucial importance it attached to the re-launching of a deepened and more strategic partnership with the United States on many global issues, on the basis of shared objectives between the two continents. It reiterated its support for the European Neighbourhood Policy and the importance of ensuring sufficient funding for development policy and poverty alleviation measures, including the Millennium Development Goals. Parliament stressed that developments in the Middle East and particularly Palestine should be carefully assessed during the budget procedure. It drew particular attention to the likelihood of chaos that would follow a collapse of the Palestinian Authority and the need for sound financial and fiscal management concerning EU aid, whether disbursed directly or through the trust funds established. The Council was urged to practise a more open, transparent and accountable CFSP.

The Security Dimension – Security, freedom and citizenship: Parliament w elcomed the fact that, in the context of external security, the Commission has included energy policy as one of the main priorities for 2007. It stressed the importance of diversifying gas and oil supply and of exploring all possible means of enhancing the EU's self-sufficiency in energy. Parliament also welcomed the start of the new freedom, security and justice programmes for 2007-2013 in the area of justice and home affairs. The objective of the integration of migrants and border management was of importance in the years to come. It stated its intention to provide sufficient means in 2007 to ensure that the extension of the Schengen area was flanked by the principle of Community solidarity in the management of the Union's external borders.

Internal Policies – Prosperity and solidarity: Member States and the Commission were urged to pay special attention to those areas that form the basis of a healthy modern economy, such as knowledge, skills, research and development, innovation, information society technologies, transport and energy. Parliament recalled the importance of strengthening the capacities of the knowledge-triangle (education, research and innovation) and reinforcing the links among them. All policies in Member States and at EU level must be geared to supporting research and innovation wherever possible. Parliament strongly supported the measures for the development and completion of the European information society as it promoted inclusion, better public services and quality of life.

In the face of increasing global competition, the capability of employers and employees alike as well as of companies as a whole to adjust sufficiently to current changes will be decisive. In this context the development of policies for the future was of vital importance and the European Globalisation adjustment Fund, as currently under discussion, might be a first step in the right direction. The setting up of a new European Institute of Technology might undermine or overlap on existing structures and might therefore not be the most effective use of funds in this context. Parliament believed that the employment potential of innovative enterprises could help the EU to overcome certain difficulties posed by global competition. It called for elimination of the barriers to the mobility of researchers and for the creation of an open and competitive labour market.

Qualitative value for money: Parliament u nderlined that the December 2005 agreement of the European Council had clearly shown that the battle for resources had begun. Council figures would mean a decrease of resources available between 2007 - 2013 by over 15% as compared to what the Commission thought necessary in its original proposal. It was therefore absolutely necessary in this situation to start looking at the quality of EU expenditure. Parliament proposed asking for cost-benefit studies to be carried out on specific areas of the budget by using part of the resources allocated to the parliamentary committees in order to assess the regularity (compliance with the Financial Regulation, financial reporting system) and the performance (efficiency of resources, effectiveness of the projects, administrative cost) of the policies as implemented, and to draw the political conclusions of such evaluations. The Commission should take immediate action to improve the effectiveness of administrative management, including the revised proposal for the Financial Regulation, with regard to the implementation of Community programmes for its own services, Member States and final beneficiaries, especially as regards small-scale projects. A thorough analysis of the effectiveness of the administrative management of Community legislation should be made on each of these four levels.

Preparing for the 2008/2009 Review: Parliament s tressed that at internal and external level, the Common Agricultural Policy should be adjusted to the future needs. It drew attention in this context to compulsory co-financing, increased market orientation, a level playing field and the abolition of export subsidies as favourable options. The 2007 budget, as the first budget of the next period, represented an opportunity to launch the new programmes within the scope of adjustments to new needs which might appear in the first part of the period. The review of all aspects of EU spending and resources planned for 2008 will offer a real opportunity to have a close look at the ways in which public money is spent.

European governance: Human and financial resources for 2007: T he proliferation of agencies, as seen over the past ten years, will undoubtedly have negative consequences for the funding of the operational programmes. Parliament considered a value-for-money approach towards the decentralised agencies as opposed to centralised activities an absolute necessity. Parliament welcomed the efforts made by the Commission in terms of redeployment between and within departments in order to optimise resources. It invited the Commission to assess carefully if further possibilities for redeployment could be found before presenting the PDB in order to reduce the number of new recruitments.

Documents
2006/05/18
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/05/17
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/05/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/04/28
   EP - Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Documents
2006/04/28
   EP - Budgetary report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/04/25
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the report by James ELLES (EPP-ED, UK) on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy for 2007. MEPs expressed concern about "the visible discrepancy between the challenges which the European Union is facing and the appropriations that might be available under the relevant headings of a backward-looking financial perspective 2007-2013 to respond effectively to these challenges, in particular for competitiveness, research and innovation, which the Council and Commission have themselves labelled as priorities". The committee noted the Commission's strategic objectives as set out in its APS document "Boosting trust through action"; although sharing its analysis, it strongly criticised the Commission for its complacency and laid-back attitude in setting out the nature of the challenges facing the European Union. The committee believed, for example, that insufficient attention had been given by the Commission to the vast and very rapid changes underway in the global economy, notably in emerging economies such as China and India.

MEPs in the committee urged the Member States and the Commission to pay special attention to those areas that form the basis of a healthy modern economy, such as knowledge, skills, research and development, innovation, information society technologies and energy. The report recalled the importance of strengthening the capacities of the "knowledge-triangle" (education, research and innovation) and reinforcing the links among them. It added that all policies in Member States and at EU level should be geared to supporting research and innovation wherever possible. The committee strongly supported the measures for the development and completion of the European information society, as this would promote inclusion, better public services and quality of life. MEPs stressed that, in the face of increasing global competition, the ability of employers and employees alike as well as of companies as a whole to adjust sufficiently to current changes would be decisive. In this context the development of policies of and for the future was of vital importance and the Globalisation Fund, as currently under discussion, might be a first step in the right direction.

The committee said that the setting up of a new European Institute of Technology could undermine or overlap with existing structures and may therefore not be the most effective use of funds in this context. It shared the Council's view that the financial framework setting up mid-term political priorities needed to be adjusted to a fast-developing world in order to allow the EU to maintain its political and economic position both at internal level, so as to meet the Lisbon objectives and, at external level, so as to meet the Millennium Goals to achieve a successful Neighbourhood Policy and to take leadership in the globalisation process. Lastly, the committee stressed that at internal and external level, the Common Agricultural Policy should be adjusted to the future needs, and drew attention in this context to compulsory co-financing, increased market orientation, a level playing field and the abolition of export subsidies as favourable options.

2006/04/21
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/04/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/04/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/03/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/03/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/03/21
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/03/14
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Annual Policy Strategy for 2007 “Boosting trust through action”.

CONTENT : this communication lays down the key objectives of the Annual Policy Strategy (APS) 2007 which is also the first year of the new financial perspectives. The launch of the new programmes under the financial framework 2007-2013 will be a tangible example of this response. It should also be a sign for the future of Europe debate to focus first on what Europe should be doing, with the support of the Plan D for Democracy, Debate and Dialogue. The Strategic Objectives of prosperity, solidarity and security adopted at the start of this Commission’s mandate offer a coherent political frame for EU action. The goal of the Annual Policy Strategy is to isolate key priorities which will develop into the core actions for 2007. 2007 will be the half-way point for this Commission. Some of its first policy initiatives will have worked through to implementation. New directions will set the scene for the second half of the Commission’s mandate. It will be a critical year for delivery of the five-year strategic objectives. 2007 will also see new directions for the second half of the Commission’s mandate. The Commission will be preparing the future, with intensive preparation of the comprehensive review of the Union’s budget leading to a White Paper in 2008-2009.

Key objectives for 2007 : the main target must continue to be growth, to provide more and better jobs in Europe, as the number one concern for citizens. With a more positive macro-economic outlook, every opportunity must be seized to accelerate reforms and put them into practice. Amongst the key objectives set out for 2007 are:

§ driving forward implementation of the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs, including key steps to give reality to a new European Energy Policy;

§ demonstrating that cohesion, solidarity and environmental protection go hand in hand with the objective of growth and jobs, and promoting equal opportunities;

§ the lifting of internal border controls with and between new Member States and the extension of the Schengen area; and greater prevention to ensure the safety and protection of citizens;

§ critical to the realisation of these objectives will be the concrete expression of enhanced policy coherence and reinforced aid effectiveness in the Union’s external stand.

The APS does not reflect everything the Commission will do in 2007. It concentrates on the Commission’s responsibility for policy initiative, but the Commission will also continue to work to implement Community policies and promote the full application of Community law. In all these areas, the Commission will continue to strengthen the application of better regulation, to maximise the quality of the Commission’s work.

The APS forms the basis for dialogue with the Council and the European Parliament in view of preparing the Commission Work Programme for 2007.

Main priorities :

1. Prosperity : the Commission will continue to support national action and to act where appropriate at Community level to help make 2007 a year when the Lisbon Strategy starts to show tangible results on the ground. Four priority areas are highlighted:

§ knowledge, with clear targets to improve Europe’s education, research and innovation framework as drivers for growth;

§ enterprise, in particular SMEs, to secure an environment and access to finance which help realise Europe’s business potential;

§ jobs and ageing, to use Europeans’ skills to best effect at every stage of their lives;

§ energy, to promote a genuine common approach to secure energy provision and its efficient use.

2. Solidarity : economic growth must go hand in hand with economic and social cohesion, a high level of environmental and human protection, with an eye towards future generations and with respect for common values. 2007 will see a new generation of solidarity programmes coming on stream, centred on a new cohesion policy and rural development. Inter-institutional negotiations and subsequent implementation of the reform of the common market organisation for wine, fruit & vegetables and bananas as well as for sugar will allow for more sustainable management of these key assets. In 2007, Europe will have to demonstrate that cohesion, solidarity and environmental protection go hand in hand with the objective of growth and jobs. The earmarking of part of cohesion expenditure for this objective, in the context of the new financial period, will be essential to this aim. Special attention will be paid to:

§ the promotion of sustainable management and protection of natural resources, with a particular focus on curtailing the loss of biodiversity;

§ proposals for an EU maritime policy which will bring an all embracing approach to the sustainable development and competitiveness of sea-based activities;

§ energy , where particular emphasis will be given to the promotion of renewables;

§ meeting the EU’s climate change commitments, by updating the EU emissions trading system;

§ 2007 will be the European Year of Equal Opportunities for all and will call for specific actions designed to facilitate the lives of citizens confronted with family-related problems or problems relating to the enforcement of judicial decisions.

3. Security and freedom : in 2007, the main target will be migration and border control, with the lifting of internal border controls with and between new Member States and the extension of the Schengen area, after verification that the necessary conditions have been met and that flanking measures have been put in place. In addition:

§ the fight against crime and violence will be of particular significance, with initiatives to reduce the scope for crime to take advantage of a Europe without frontiers;

§ other measures would centre on efforts to ensure fair and effective criminal investigation across the EU;

§ greater preventive efforts will ensure the safety and protection of citizens. Protection against diseases will be a particular focus for EU action in cooperation with the Member States, third countries and international organisations, as well as the development of EU rapid response capacity in the event of major terrorist attacks and other disasters. Tighter inspections of nuclear facilities will also be pursued through the new approach of control of safety and guarantees of radioprotection.

4. Europe as a world partner : in trade, 2007 should start to bear the fruits of the Doha round, which will have to reflect solidarity with the developing world while ensuring the opening up of new markets for Community goods and services.

§ 2007 should be the year of Bulgaria’s and Romania’s accession to the European Union provided they comply timely with the conditions necessary to fully implement the acquis from the first day of accession. The Commission is finalising its assessment for May 2006 and the European Council should take a final decision this year;

§ progress in the stabilisation of the Western Balkans, notably in view of the clarification of the status of Kosovo, and the opening of major chapters in the negotiations with Turkey and Croatia will make a major contribution to Europe’s overall security and stability and to the consolidation of the bases for its long-term prosperity;

§ in the European neighbourhood, links with partner countries will be further enhanced through the implementation of Action Plans and regional and cross border cooperation. Energy will be a core theme within the convergence of regulatory frameworks to favour trade and investment;

§ the completion of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) negotiations with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries will bring Europe’s relations with its ACP partners into a new phase, strengthening the dynamics of regional integration and creating a powerful development tool by combining predictable trade rules, the creation of larger markets and support measures tailored to the needs of ACP countries;

§ the EU will also need to continue its efforts to build a more effective and consolidated response to conflict prevention, crisis management and peace building, by rapid mobilisation of resources and expertise. Greater attention will be paid to reforms carried out by partner countries in the field of human rights and democracy, and to closer electoral observation.

It should be noted that for the 4 areas mentioned above, the Commission provides a precise list of concrete actions to be carried out.

European governance and better regulation in action : the Commission has made solid progress on improving the quality of its policy and legislative proposals through systematic assessment of their economic, social and environmental impacts. There is a commitment to continue qualitative improvements to the impact assessment system and the results of an external evaluation of the Commission’s impact assessment experience will feed into this discussion in 2007. A second key area of improvement concerns simplification. 2007 will see the delivery of many of the simplification initiatives set out in its 3-year rolling programme. This programme covers various fields, from environment (e.g. in the areas of waste, industrial emissions and ozone layer) to industry (e.g. in the construction, automotive, cosmetics and medical devices sectors) to the modernisation of labour law, the promotion of consumer rights and key internal market sectors (regulation of financial services, labelling of feed/animal nutrition and of foodstuffs). Simplification is the basis of the new architecture proposed for external financial instruments for 2007-2013. The Commission also continues to improve its work on improving dialogue with Member States to ensure timely implementation and effective and equitable application.

Financial resources : the APS decision typically provides details of new financial resources allocated to policy areas for specific initiatives, presented in terms of variations to the existing financial programming. However, because the financial programming is dependent on the Financial Perspectives, by way of exception the Annual Policy Strategy for 2007 does not deal with financial resources. Nonetheless, the financial programming will be finalised with the preliminary draft budget and subsequently adapted by the Commission once an interinstitutional agreement on the Financial Perspectives is reached.

Human resources : the request in 2007 is for a net increase of 640 additional staff members. In accordance with its communication presented last November on the consequences of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania on its human resources, assessed at 850 new staff, the Commission asks for 250 new posts. This overall recruitment constitutes the indispensable basis for carrying forward the management and supervision of Community programmes, and for implementing the acquis communautaire within the enlarged Union.

2006/03/14
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted the following conclusions, which will serve as the basis for discussions with the European Parliament and the Commission on preparation of the EU's general budget for 2007. In particular, it:

- underlines the fact that the budgetary procedure for 2007 will be marked by two important elements, on the one hand the new Financial Perspective for 2007-2013 to be agreed, and on the other hand the forthcoming accession of two countries to the EU to be confirmed. This should clearly be reflected in the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) for 2007;

- reaffirms the importance of maintaining a framework of overall budget discipline. It reiterates its wish that the EU budget for 2007 should provide sufficient resources to implement the various policies of the EU effectively and efficiently. It emphasises that it should apply the same degree of budgetary constraint as exercised by the Member States of the EU for their own national budgets;

- is convinced of the importance of good collaboration between the two arms of the Budgetary Authority and the Commission, and looks forward to establishing a good spirit of cooperation for the 2007 budget procedure;

- confirms that the forthcoming Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and improvement of budgetary procedure covering the period 2007-2013 will constitute the basis for establishing the budget for 2007. It recalls its constant willingness to apply the IIA to the full. It lays great emphasis on compliance with the Financial Perspective, which requires that Community expenditure remains within the annual limits to be set therein. For the purpose of sound financial management and to deal with unforeseen circumstances it is important that sufficient margins must be maintained under all the ceilings of the various Headings, with the exception of Heading 1b, especially in the first year of the new financial period;

- emphasises that the appropriations for 2007 should reflect real and well-defined needs and be compatible with the ceilings set in the Financial Perspective. Absorption capacity and past implementation should also be taken into account when establishing appropriations. It considers that all appropriations need to be reviewed in detail for each policy sector and in this context it reaffirms the importance of reallocation in order to allow the Budgetary Authority to make the necessary financial adaptations to meet present and future needs. For this purpose it points to the necessity of having high quality Activity Statements and financial information on spending proposals in good time;

- considers it important that the implementation of the EU budget is improved in 2007 so that the significant under-implementation of funds that occurred in the first years of the Financial Perspective 2000-2006 should be avoided. Therefore, the Council stresses the importance of the adoption of implementing rules and guidelines where applicable by the Commission on the basis of the adopted regulations in due time in 2006 in order to enable implementation to start in an efficient way by 1 January 2007. In this context, the Council underlines the need for explicit and simple rules;

- stresses once again the importance of keeping a tight grip on payment appropriations. The level of payment appropriations entered into the budget should be sufficient but not overestimated, taking into account past implementation and the genuine requirements for 2007;

- considers that the Member States should present structural funds estimates that are as accurate as possible, while assessing the actual need for appropriations to be put into the Preliminary Draft Budget is the responsibility of the Commission;

- looks forward to continued improvement of the "Activity Based Budgeting" in 2007 assisted by the introduction of specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely objectives, appropriate performance indicators and full evaluation procedures into all Community programmes with implications for the EU budget, as specified in the Financial Regulation;

- calls on the Commission to take full account of Council delegations' comments following detailed examinations of various activity statements in the two previous years. It intends to continue an enhanced examination of a set of Activity Statements during the 2007 budget procedure and places particular emphasis on Activity Statements covering legal bases and financial envelopes that are being renewed and/or adopted;

- is committed to improving the impact of the "Activity Based Budgeting" information during the discussion on the annual budget, in particular in terms of the justification for Community actions and explanations for the proposed variations of appropriations. The Council calls on the Commission to improve the implementation of the ABB approach to its administrative expenditure so as to reflect the real administrative costs related to each policy area;

- invites the Commission to present the appropriate information which allows the comparison between the implementation of the 2005 budget, the 2006 budget and the 2007 PDB, at the start of the budget procedure for 2007;

- identifies the following elements as important in preparing the 2007 budget: it invites the Commission to continue its efforts together with Member States towards establishing an accurate level of payment appropriations for structural funds. Furthermore, the Council recalls the importance of simplification of procedures aimed at facilitating implementation; the Commission is invited, as in previous years, to present realistic forecasts regarding CAP expenditure in its Preliminary Draft Budget. Particular attention should be given to ensuring that the payment appropriations for expenditure related to rural development are accurate;

- believes, that sufficient margins within the external relations ceiling are crucial in order to be able to respond to unforeseen actions and crises and emphasises the current principle that the institutions will ensure as far as possible that sufficient margins are left available. It considers that account should be taken of its priorities and recalls, in this connection, the importance that it has always attached to CFSP funding;

- considers it important that institutional effectiveness is an increasingly important factor when allocating administrative resources. It recalls the importance that the institutions should ensure that the recruitment process in the context of the enlargement is carried forward without delay;

- underlines the need to ensure that pilot projects and preparatory actions are feasible and consistent with the EU's new priority actions and to examine their practical application. In this context it considers it appropriate that the Commission takes the relevant initiatives in the annual budget process to develop the various pilot projects and preparatory actions within the financial limits set in the IIA, in a comprehensive and co-ordinated manner;

- underlines the great importance that it attaches to these guidelines in the forthcoming budgetary procedure and expects them to be fully taken into account already in the Preliminary Draft Budget for 2007. These guidelines will be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Commission.

2006/03/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/03/13
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to present the Annual Policy Strategy for 2007 “Boosting trust through action”.

CONTENT : this communication lays down the key objectives of the Annual Policy Strategy (APS) 2007 which is also the first year of the new financial perspectives. The launch of the new programmes under the financial framework 2007-2013 will be a tangible example of this response. It should also be a sign for the future of Europe debate to focus first on what Europe should be doing, with the support of the Plan D for Democracy, Debate and Dialogue. The Strategic Objectives of prosperity, solidarity and security adopted at the start of this Commission’s mandate offer a coherent political frame for EU action. The goal of the Annual Policy Strategy is to isolate key priorities which will develop into the core actions for 2007. 2007 will be the half-way point for this Commission. Some of its first policy initiatives will have worked through to implementation. New directions will set the scene for the second half of the Commission’s mandate. It will be a critical year for delivery of the five-year strategic objectives. 2007 will also see new directions for the second half of the Commission’s mandate. The Commission will be preparing the future, with intensive preparation of the comprehensive review of the Union’s budget leading to a White Paper in 2008-2009.

Key objectives for 2007 : the main target must continue to be growth, to provide more and better jobs in Europe, as the number one concern for citizens. With a more positive macro-economic outlook, every opportunity must be seized to accelerate reforms and put them into practice. Amongst the key objectives set out for 2007 are:

§ driving forward implementation of the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs, including key steps to give reality to a new European Energy Policy;

§ demonstrating that cohesion, solidarity and environmental protection go hand in hand with the objective of growth and jobs, and promoting equal opportunities;

§ the lifting of internal border controls with and between new Member States and the extension of the Schengen area; and greater prevention to ensure the safety and protection of citizens;

§ critical to the realisation of these objectives will be the concrete expression of enhanced policy coherence and reinforced aid effectiveness in the Union’s external stand.

The APS does not reflect everything the Commission will do in 2007. It concentrates on the Commission’s responsibility for policy initiative, but the Commission will also continue to work to implement Community policies and promote the full application of Community law. In all these areas, the Commission will continue to strengthen the application of better regulation, to maximise the quality of the Commission’s work.

The APS forms the basis for dialogue with the Council and the European Parliament in view of preparing the Commission Work Programme for 2007.

Main priorities :

1. Prosperity : the Commission will continue to support national action and to act where appropriate at Community level to help make 2007 a year when the Lisbon Strategy starts to show tangible results on the ground. Four priority areas are highlighted:

§ knowledge, with clear targets to improve Europe’s education, research and innovation framework as drivers for growth;

§ enterprise, in particular SMEs, to secure an environment and access to finance which help realise Europe’s business potential;

§ jobs and ageing, to use Europeans’ skills to best effect at every stage of their lives;

§ energy, to promote a genuine common approach to secure energy provision and its efficient use.

2. Solidarity : economic growth must go hand in hand with economic and social cohesion, a high level of environmental and human protection, with an eye towards future generations and with respect for common values. 2007 will see a new generation of solidarity programmes coming on stream, centred on a new cohesion policy and rural development. Inter-institutional negotiations and subsequent implementation of the reform of the common market organisation for wine, fruit & vegetables and bananas as well as for sugar will allow for more sustainable management of these key assets. In 2007, Europe will have to demonstrate that cohesion, solidarity and environmental protection go hand in hand with the objective of growth and jobs. The earmarking of part of cohesion expenditure for this objective, in the context of the new financial period, will be essential to this aim. Special attention will be paid to:

§ the promotion of sustainable management and protection of natural resources, with a particular focus on curtailing the loss of biodiversity;

§ proposals for an EU maritime policy which will bring an all embracing approach to the sustainable development and competitiveness of sea-based activities;

§ energy , where particular emphasis will be given to the promotion of renewables;

§ meeting the EU’s climate change commitments, by updating the EU emissions trading system;

§ 2007 will be the European Year of Equal Opportunities for all and will call for specific actions designed to facilitate the lives of citizens confronted with family-related problems or problems relating to the enforcement of judicial decisions.

3. Security and freedom : in 2007, the main target will be migration and border control, with the lifting of internal border controls with and between new Member States and the extension of the Schengen area, after verification that the necessary conditions have been met and that flanking measures have been put in place. In addition:

§ the fight against crime and violence will be of particular significance, with initiatives to reduce the scope for crime to take advantage of a Europe without frontiers;

§ other measures would centre on efforts to ensure fair and effective criminal investigation across the EU;

§ greater preventive efforts will ensure the safety and protection of citizens. Protection against diseases will be a particular focus for EU action in cooperation with the Member States, third countries and international organisations, as well as the development of EU rapid response capacity in the event of major terrorist attacks and other disasters. Tighter inspections of nuclear facilities will also be pursued through the new approach of control of safety and guarantees of radioprotection.

4. Europe as a world partner : in trade, 2007 should start to bear the fruits of the Doha round, which will have to reflect solidarity with the developing world while ensuring the opening up of new markets for Community goods and services.

§ 2007 should be the year of Bulgaria’s and Romania’s accession to the European Union provided they comply timely with the conditions necessary to fully implement the acquis from the first day of accession. The Commission is finalising its assessment for May 2006 and the European Council should take a final decision this year;

§ progress in the stabilisation of the Western Balkans, notably in view of the clarification of the status of Kosovo, and the opening of major chapters in the negotiations with Turkey and Croatia will make a major contribution to Europe’s overall security and stability and to the consolidation of the bases for its long-term prosperity;

§ in the European neighbourhood, links with partner countries will be further enhanced through the implementation of Action Plans and regional and cross border cooperation. Energy will be a core theme within the convergence of regulatory frameworks to favour trade and investment;

§ the completion of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) negotiations with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries will bring Europe’s relations with its ACP partners into a new phase, strengthening the dynamics of regional integration and creating a powerful development tool by combining predictable trade rules, the creation of larger markets and support measures tailored to the needs of ACP countries;

§ the EU will also need to continue its efforts to build a more effective and consolidated response to conflict prevention, crisis management and peace building, by rapid mobilisation of resources and expertise. Greater attention will be paid to reforms carried out by partner countries in the field of human rights and democracy, and to closer electoral observation.

It should be noted that for the 4 areas mentioned above, the Commission provides a precise list of concrete actions to be carried out.

European governance and better regulation in action : the Commission has made solid progress on improving the quality of its policy and legislative proposals through systematic assessment of their economic, social and environmental impacts. There is a commitment to continue qualitative improvements to the impact assessment system and the results of an external evaluation of the Commission’s impact assessment experience will feed into this discussion in 2007. A second key area of improvement concerns simplification. 2007 will see the delivery of many of the simplification initiatives set out in its 3-year rolling programme. This programme covers various fields, from environment (e.g. in the areas of waste, industrial emissions and ozone layer) to industry (e.g. in the construction, automotive, cosmetics and medical devices sectors) to the modernisation of labour law, the promotion of consumer rights and key internal market sectors (regulation of financial services, labelling of feed/animal nutrition and of foodstuffs). Simplification is the basis of the new architecture proposed for external financial instruments for 2007-2013. The Commission also continues to improve its work on improving dialogue with Member States to ensure timely implementation and effective and equitable application.

Financial resources : the APS decision typically provides details of new financial resources allocated to policy areas for specific initiatives, presented in terms of variations to the existing financial programming. However, because the financial programming is dependent on the Financial Perspectives, by way of exception the Annual Policy Strategy for 2007 does not deal with financial resources. Nonetheless, the financial programming will be finalised with the preliminary draft budget and subsequently adapted by the Commission once an interinstitutional agreement on the Financial Perspectives is reached.

Human resources : the request in 2007 is for a net increase of 640 additional staff members. In accordance with its communication presented last November on the consequences of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania on its human resources, assessed at 850 new staff, the Commission asks for 250 new posts. This overall recruitment constitutes the indispensable basis for carrying forward the management and supervision of Community programmes, and for implementing the acquis communautaire within the enlarged Union.

2006/01/25
   EP - SCHRÖDER Jürgen (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2006/01/25
   EP - MARTIN David (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2006/01/11
   EP - ELLES James (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2005/12/07
   EP - SZENT-IVÁNYI István (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Elles A6-0154/2006 - par. 5 #

2006/05/18 Outcome: +: 510, 0: 33, -: 28
DE FR ES GB PL IT NL HU PT BE AT CZ EL FI DK SE SK LT IE LV SI EE LU MT CY
Total
80
68
47
58
47
43
21
19
22
18
16
18
19
12
10
16
9
8
11
9
6
5
4
3
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
218

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
4

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
161

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2
3

Slovakia PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Italy UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
24

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Rapport Elles A6-0154/2006 - am. 13 #

2006/05/18 Outcome: -: 339, +: 189, 0: 42
DK MT PT EE PL AT LU LV CY SI FI LT EL BE HU SK FR ES NL IT IE CZ SE GB DE
Total
9
5
20
5
48
15
3
9
2
6
10
8
18
21
19
10
66
49
21
45
11
19
15
59
77
icon: PSE PSE
163

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2

Sweden PSE

3
icon: UEN UEN
20

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Italy UEN

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
29

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
26

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Slovakia NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
67
4

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

3

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Netherlands ALDE

4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
215

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Rapport Elles A6-0154/2006 - résolution #

2006/05/18 Outcome: +: 514, -: 56, 0: 8
DE FR PL ES GB IT NL HU BE PT AT EL FI CZ LV SK LT DK IE SE SI EE MT LU CY
Total
78
67
48
50
58
44
22
19
21
21
16
19
12
18
9
9
8
10
11
16
6
5
5
4
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
216

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
icon: PSE PSE
163

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1
3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Spain ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
20

Italy UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
20

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
27

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2006-03-14T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-03-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE371.799
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2
date
2006-03-23T00:00:00
docs
title: PE371.799
committee
INTA
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-371799_EN.html
docs/3
date
2006-04-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE371.790
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2006-04-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE371.790
committee
DEVE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-371790_EN.html
docs/5
date
2006-04-21T00:00:00
docs
title: PE369.896
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6
date
2006-04-21T00:00:00
docs
title: PE369.896
committee
AFET
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/6/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-369896_EN.html
docs/7
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)2902
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2006)2902
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8
date
2006-08-01T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)3065-2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=1&l=en
docs/9
date
2006-08-01T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)3065-2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/9/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=1&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=0&l=en
events/1
date
2006-03-13T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1
date
2006-03-14T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.730
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE371.730
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.799&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.893
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE371.893
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.790&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE372.094
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE372.094
docs/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.896&secondRef=02
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0154_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0154_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=0&l=en
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2006-04-28T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0154_EN.html title: A6-0154/2006
events/3
date
2006-04-28T00:00:00
type
Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0154_EN.html title: A6-0154/2006
events/4/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060517&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060517&type=CRE
events/7
date
2006-05-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0221_EN.html title: T6-0221/2006
summary
events/7
date
2006-05-18T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0221_EN.html title: T6-0221/2006
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: ELLES James date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2006-01-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ELLES James group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2005-12-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.799
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.799&secondRef=02
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-154&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0154_EN.html
docs/7/body
EC
docs/8/body
EC
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-154&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0154_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-221
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0221_EN.html
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2716 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0122 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52006DC0122:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2006-04-25T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ELLES James body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-154&language=EN type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading title: A6-0154/2006 body: EP type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
  • date: 2006-05-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ELLES James body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-05-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060517&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4667&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-221 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0221/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Budget commissioner: --
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2006-01-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ELLES James group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2005-12-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2005-12-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN David group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
BUDG
date
2006-01-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: ELLES James
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2006-01-25T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: PSE name: MARTIN David
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2716 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2716*&MEET_DATE=14/03/2006 date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2006-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.730 title: PE371.730 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.799 title: PE371.799 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.893 title: PE371.893 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE371.790&secondRef=02 title: PE371.790 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE372.094 title: PE372.094 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE369.896&secondRef=02 title: PE369.896 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-154&language=EN title: A6-0154/2006 type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)2902 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2006-08-01T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=4667&j=1&l=en title: SP(2006)3065-2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted the following conclusions, which will serve as the basis for discussions with the European Parliament and the Commission on preparation of the EU's general budget for 2007. In particular, it: - underlines the fact that the budgetary procedure for 2007 will be marked by two important elements, on the one hand the new Financial Perspective for 2007-2013 to be agreed, and on the other hand the forthcoming accession of two countries to the EU to be confirmed. This should clearly be reflected in the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) for 2007; - reaffirms the importance of maintaining a framework of overall budget discipline. It reiterates its wish that the EU budget for 2007 should provide sufficient resources to implement the various policies of the EU effectively and efficiently. It emphasises that it should apply the same degree of budgetary constraint as exercised by the Member States of the EU for their own national budgets; - is convinced of the importance of good collaboration between the two arms of the Budgetary Authority and the Commission, and looks forward to establishing a good spirit of cooperation for the 2007 budget procedure; - confirms that the forthcoming Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and improvement of budgetary procedure covering the period 2007-2013 will constitute the basis for establishing the budget for 2007. It recalls its constant willingness to apply the IIA to the full. It lays great emphasis on compliance with the Financial Perspective, which requires that Community expenditure remains within the annual limits to be set therein. For the purpose of sound financial management and to deal with unforeseen circumstances it is important that sufficient margins must be maintained under all the ceilings of the various Headings, with the exception of Heading 1b, especially in the first year of the new financial period; - emphasises that the appropriations for 2007 should reflect real and well-defined needs and be compatible with the ceilings set in the Financial Perspective. Absorption capacity and past implementation should also be taken into account when establishing appropriations. It considers that all appropriations need to be reviewed in detail for each policy sector and in this context it reaffirms the importance of reallocation in order to allow the Budgetary Authority to make the necessary financial adaptations to meet present and future needs. For this purpose it points to the necessity of having high quality Activity Statements and financial information on spending proposals in good time; - considers it important that the implementation of the EU budget is improved in 2007 so that the significant under-implementation of funds that occurred in the first years of the Financial Perspective 2000-2006 should be avoided. Therefore, the Council stresses the importance of the adoption of implementing rules and guidelines where applicable by the Commission on the basis of the adopted regulations in due time in 2006 in order to enable implementation to start in an efficient way by 1 January 2007. In this context, the Council underlines the need for explicit and simple rules; - stresses once again the importance of keeping a tight grip on payment appropriations. The level of payment appropriations entered into the budget should be sufficient but not overestimated, taking into account past implementation and the genuine requirements for 2007; - considers that the Member States should present structural funds estimates that are as accurate as possible, while assessing the actual need for appropriations to be put into the Preliminary Draft Budget is the responsibility of the Commission; - looks forward to continued improvement of the "Activity Based Budgeting" in 2007 assisted by the introduction of specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely objectives, appropriate performance indicators and full evaluation procedures into all Community programmes with implications for the EU budget, as specified in the Financial Regulation; - calls on the Commission to take full account of Council delegations' comments following detailed examinations of various activity statements in the two previous years. It intends to continue an enhanced examination of a set of Activity Statements during the 2007 budget procedure and places particular emphasis on Activity Statements covering legal bases and financial envelopes that are being renewed and/or adopted; - is committed to improving the impact of the "Activity Based Budgeting" information during the discussion on the annual budget, in particular in terms of the justification for Community actions and explanations for the proposed variations of appropriations. The Council calls on the Commission to improve the implementation of the ABB approach to its administrative expenditure so as to reflect the real administrative costs related to each policy area; - invites the Commission to present the appropriate information which allows the comparison between the implementation of the 2005 budget, the 2006 budget and the 2007 PDB, at the start of the budget procedure for 2007; - identifies the following elements as important in preparing the 2007 budget: it invites the Commission to continue its efforts together with Member States towards establishing an accurate level of payment appropriations for structural funds. Furthermore, the Council recalls the importance of simplification of procedures aimed at facilitating implementation; the Commission is invited, as in previous years, to present realistic forecasts regarding CAP expenditure in its Preliminary Draft Budget. Particular attention should be given to ensuring that the payment appropriations for expenditure related to rural development are accurate; - believes, that sufficient margins within the external relations ceiling are crucial in order to be able to respond to unforeseen actions and crises and emphasises the current principle that the institutions will ensure as far as possible that sufficient margins are left available. It considers that account should be taken of its priorities and recalls, in this connection, the importance that it has always attached to CFSP funding; - considers it important that institutional effectiveness is an increasingly important factor when allocating administrative resources. It recalls the importance that the institutions should ensure that the recruitment process in the context of the enlargement is carried forward without delay; - underlines the need to ensure that pilot projects and preparatory actions are feasible and consistent with the EU's new priority actions and to examine their practical application. In this context it considers it appropriate that the Commission takes the relevant initiatives in the annual budget process to develop the various pilot projects and preparatory actions within the financial limits set in the IIA, in a comprehensive and co-ordinated manner; - underlines the great importance that it attaches to these guidelines in the forthcoming budgetary procedure and expects them to be fully taken into account already in the Preliminary Draft Budget for 2007. These guidelines will be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Commission.
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0122 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=122 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present the Annual Policy Strategy for 2007 “Boosting trust through action”. CONTENT : this communication lays down the key objectives of the Annual Policy Strategy (APS) 2007 which is also the first year of the new financial perspectives. The launch of the new programmes under the financial framework 2007-2013 will be a tangible example of this response. It should also be a sign for the future of Europe debate to focus first on what Europe should be doing, with the support of the Plan D for Democracy, Debate and Dialogue. The Strategic Objectives of prosperity, solidarity and security adopted at the start of this Commission’s mandate offer a coherent political frame for EU action. The goal of the Annual Policy Strategy is to isolate key priorities which will develop into the core actions for 2007. 2007 will be the half-way point for this Commission. Some of its first policy initiatives will have worked through to implementation. New directions will set the scene for the second half of the Commission’s mandate. It will be a critical year for delivery of the five-year strategic objectives. 2007 will also see new directions for the second half of the Commission’s mandate. The Commission will be preparing the future, with intensive preparation of the comprehensive review of the Union’s budget leading to a White Paper in 2008-2009. Key objectives for 2007 : the main target must continue to be growth, to provide more and better jobs in Europe, as the number one concern for citizens. With a more positive macro-economic outlook, every opportunity must be seized to accelerate reforms and put them into practice. Amongst the key objectives set out for 2007 are: § driving forward implementation of the renewed Lisbon strategy for growth and jobs, including key steps to give reality to a new European Energy Policy; § demonstrating that cohesion, solidarity and environmental protection go hand in hand with the objective of growth and jobs, and promoting equal opportunities; § the lifting of internal border controls with and between new Member States and the extension of the Schengen area; and greater prevention to ensure the safety and protection of citizens; § critical to the realisation of these objectives will be the concrete expression of enhanced policy coherence and reinforced aid effectiveness in the Union’s external stand. The APS does not reflect everything the Commission will do in 2007. It concentrates on the Commission’s responsibility for policy initiative, but the Commission will also continue to work to implement Community policies and promote the full application of Community law. In all these areas, the Commission will continue to strengthen the application of better regulation, to maximise the quality of the Commission’s work. The APS forms the basis for dialogue with the Council and the European Parliament in view of preparing the Commission Work Programme for 2007. Main priorities : 1. Prosperity : the Commission will continue to support national action and to act where appropriate at Community level to help make 2007 a year when the Lisbon Strategy starts to show tangible results on the ground. Four priority areas are highlighted: § knowledge, with clear targets to improve Europe’s education, research and innovation framework as drivers for growth; § enterprise, in particular SMEs, to secure an environment and access to finance which help realise Europe’s business potential; § jobs and ageing, to use Europeans’ skills to best effect at every stage of their lives; § energy, to promote a genuine common approach to secure energy provision and its efficient use. 2. Solidarity : economic growth must go hand in hand with economic and social cohesion, a high level of environmental and human protection, with an eye towards future generations and with respect for common values. 2007 will see a new generation of solidarity programmes coming on stream, centred on a new cohesion policy and rural development. Inter-institutional negotiations and subsequent implementation of the reform of the common market organisation for wine, fruit & vegetables and bananas as well as for sugar will allow for more sustainable management of these key assets. In 2007, Europe will have to demonstrate that cohesion, solidarity and environmental protection go hand in hand with the objective of growth and jobs. The earmarking of part of cohesion expenditure for this objective, in the context of the new financial period, will be essential to this aim. Special attention will be paid to: § the promotion of sustainable management and protection of natural resources, with a particular focus on curtailing the loss of biodiversity; § proposals for an EU maritime policy which will bring an all embracing approach to the sustainable development and competitiveness of sea-based activities; § energy , where particular emphasis will be given to the promotion of renewables; § meeting the EU’s climate change commitments, by updating the EU emissions trading system; § 2007 will be the European Year of Equal Opportunities for all and will call for specific actions designed to facilitate the lives of citizens confronted with family-related problems or problems relating to the enforcement of judicial decisions. 3. Security and freedom : in 2007, the main target will be migration and border control, with the lifting of internal border controls with and between new Member States and the extension of the Schengen area, after verification that the necessary conditions have been met and that flanking measures have been put in place. In addition: § the fight against crime and violence will be of particular significance, with initiatives to reduce the scope for crime to take advantage of a Europe without frontiers; § other measures would centre on efforts to ensure fair and effective criminal investigation across the EU; § greater preventive efforts will ensure the safety and protection of citizens. Protection against diseases will be a particular focus for EU action in cooperation with the Member States, third countries and international organisations, as well as the development of EU rapid response capacity in the event of major terrorist attacks and other disasters. Tighter inspections of nuclear facilities will also be pursued through the new approach of control of safety and guarantees of radioprotection. 4. Europe as a world partner : in trade, 2007 should start to bear the fruits of the Doha round, which will have to reflect solidarity with the developing world while ensuring the opening up of new markets for Community goods and services. § 2007 should be the year of Bulgaria’s and Romania’s accession to the European Union provided they comply timely with the conditions necessary to fully implement the acquis from the first day of accession. The Commission is finalising its assessment for May 2006 and the European Council should take a final decision this year; § progress in the stabilisation of the Western Balkans, notably in view of the clarification of the status of Kosovo, and the opening of major chapters in the negotiations with Turkey and Croatia will make a major contribution to Europe’s overall security and stability and to the consolidation of the bases for its long-term prosperity; § in the European neighbourhood, links with partner countries will be further enhanced through the implementation of Action Plans and regional and cross border cooperation. Energy will be a core theme within the convergence of regulatory frameworks to favour trade and investment; § the completion of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) negotiations with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries will bring Europe’s relations with its ACP partners into a new phase, strengthening the dynamics of regional integration and creating a powerful development tool by combining predictable trade rules, the creation of larger markets and support measures tailored to the needs of ACP countries; § the EU will also need to continue its efforts to build a more effective and consolidated response to conflict prevention, crisis management and peace building, by rapid mobilisation of resources and expertise. Greater attention will be paid to reforms carried out by partner countries in the field of human rights and democracy, and to closer electoral observation. It should be noted that for the 4 areas mentioned above, the Commission provides a precise list of concrete actions to be carried out. European governance and better regulation in action : the Commission has made solid progress on improving the quality of its policy and legislative proposals through systematic assessment of their economic, social and environmental impacts. There is a commitment to continue qualitative improvements to the impact assessment system and the results of an external evaluation of the Commission’s impact assessment experience will feed into this discussion in 2007. A second key area of improvement concerns simplification. 2007 will see the delivery of many of the simplification initiatives set out in its 3-year rolling programme. This programme covers various fields, from environment (e.g. in the areas of waste, industrial emissions and ozone layer) to industry (e.g. in the construction, automotive, cosmetics and medical devices sectors) to the modernisation of labour law, the promotion of consumer rights and key internal market sectors (regulation of financial services, labelling of feed/animal nutrition and of foodstuffs). Simplification is the basis of the new architecture proposed for external financial instruments for 2007-2013. The Commission also continues to improve its work on improving dialogue with Member States to ensure timely implementation and effective and equitable application. Financial resources : the APS decision typically provides details of new financial resources allocated to policy areas for specific initiatives, presented in terms of variations to the existing financial programming. However, because the financial programming is dependent on the Financial Perspectives, by way of exception the Annual Policy Strategy for 2007 does not deal with financial resources. Nonetheless, the financial programming will be finalised with the preliminary draft budget and subsequently adapted by the Commission once an interinstitutional agreement on the Financial Perspectives is reached. Human resources : the request in 2007 is for a net increase of 640 additional staff members. In accordance with its communication presented last November on the consequences of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania on its human resources, assessed at 850 new staff, the Commission asks for 250 new posts. This overall recruitment constitutes the indispensable basis for carrying forward the management and supervision of Community programmes, and for implementing the acquis communautaire within the enlarged Union.
  • date: 2006-04-25T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the report by James ELLES (EPP-ED, UK) on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy for 2007. MEPs expressed concern about "the visible discrepancy between the challenges which the European Union is facing and the appropriations that might be available under the relevant headings of a backward-looking financial perspective 2007-2013 to respond effectively to these challenges, in particular for competitiveness, research and innovation, which the Council and Commission have themselves labelled as priorities". The committee noted the Commission's strategic objectives as set out in its APS document "Boosting trust through action"; although sharing its analysis, it strongly criticised the Commission for its complacency and laid-back attitude in setting out the nature of the challenges facing the European Union. The committee believed, for example, that insufficient attention had been given by the Commission to the vast and very rapid changes underway in the global economy, notably in emerging economies such as China and India. MEPs in the committee urged the Member States and the Commission to pay special attention to those areas that form the basis of a healthy modern economy, such as knowledge, skills, research and development, innovation, information society technologies and energy. The report recalled the importance of strengthening the capacities of the "knowledge-triangle" (education, research and innovation) and reinforcing the links among them. It added that all policies in Member States and at EU level should be geared to supporting research and innovation wherever possible. The committee strongly supported the measures for the development and completion of the European information society, as this would promote inclusion, better public services and quality of life. MEPs stressed that, in the face of increasing global competition, the ability of employers and employees alike as well as of companies as a whole to adjust sufficiently to current changes would be decisive. In this context the development of policies of and for the future was of vital importance and the Globalisation Fund, as currently under discussion, might be a first step in the right direction. The committee said that the setting up of a new European Institute of Technology could undermine or overlap with existing structures and may therefore not be the most effective use of funds in this context. It shared the Council's view that the financial framework setting up mid-term political priorities needed to be adjusted to a fast-developing world in order to allow the EU to maintain its political and economic position both at internal level, so as to meet the Lisbon objectives and, at external level, so as to meet the Millennium Goals to achieve a successful Neighbourhood Policy and to take leadership in the globalisation process. Lastly, the committee stressed that at internal and external level, the Common Agricultural Policy should be adjusted to the future needs, and drew attention in this context to compulsory co-financing, increased market orientation, a level playing field and the abolition of export subsidies as favourable options.
  • date: 2006-04-28T00:00:00 type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-154&language=EN title: A6-0154/2006
  • date: 2006-05-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-05-17T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060517&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4667&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-221 title: T6-0221/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution drafted by James ELLES (EPP-ED, UK) on the Commission's Annual Policy Strategy for 2007. Context: Parliament e xpressed concern about the visible discrepancy between the challenges which the EU is facing and the appropriations that might be available under the relevant headings of an unambitious Multi-Annual Financial Framework (MFF) 2007-2013 to respond effectively to these challenges, in particular for competitiveness, research and innovation, which the Council and Commission had themselves labelled as priorities. The Annual Policy Strategy did not reflect the urgency with which such challenges should be addressed or provide the necessary vision for encouraging economic reform to meet them. Parliament noted the Commission's strategic objectives as set out in its APS document "Boosting trust through action", but strongly criticised the Commission for its complacency and laid back attitude in setting out the nature of the challenges facing the EU. It believed, for example, that insufficient attention had been given by the Commission to the vast and very rapid changes underway in the global economy, notably in emerging economies such as China and India. For the 2007 budget, the three main strands should be setting policy priorities; ensuring qualitative value for money; and beginning preparations for the review in 2008/2009, this because the 2007 budget and its implementation will enable the effectiveness of the new MFF to be assessed. Setting Policy Priorities External Relations – Europe as a world partner: Parliament spoke of the crucial importance it attached to the re-launching of a deepened and more strategic partnership with the United States on many global issues, on the basis of shared objectives between the two continents. It reiterated its support for the European Neighbourhood Policy and the importance of ensuring sufficient funding for development policy and poverty alleviation measures, including the Millennium Development Goals. Parliament stressed that developments in the Middle East and particularly Palestine should be carefully assessed during the budget procedure. It drew particular attention to the likelihood of chaos that would follow a collapse of the Palestinian Authority and the need for sound financial and fiscal management concerning EU aid, whether disbursed directly or through the trust funds established. The Council was urged to practise a more open, transparent and accountable CFSP. The Security Dimension – Security, freedom and citizenship: Parliament w elcomed the fact that, in the context of external security, the Commission has included energy policy as one of the main priorities for 2007. It stressed the importance of diversifying gas and oil supply and of exploring all possible means of enhancing the EU's self-sufficiency in energy. Parliament also welcomed the start of the new freedom, security and justice programmes for 2007-2013 in the area of justice and home affairs. The objective of the integration of migrants and border management was of importance in the years to come. It stated its intention to provide sufficient means in 2007 to ensure that the extension of the Schengen area was flanked by the principle of Community solidarity in the management of the Union's external borders. Internal Policies – Prosperity and solidarity: Member States and the Commission were urged to pay special attention to those areas that form the basis of a healthy modern economy, such as knowledge, skills, research and development, innovation, information society technologies, transport and energy. Parliament recalled the importance of strengthening the capacities of the knowledge-triangle (education, research and innovation) and reinforcing the links among them. All policies in Member States and at EU level must be geared to supporting research and innovation wherever possible. Parliament strongly supported the measures for the development and completion of the European information society as it promoted inclusion, better public services and quality of life. In the face of increasing global competition, the capability of employers and employees alike as well as of companies as a whole to adjust sufficiently to current changes will be decisive. In this context the development of policies for the future was of vital importance and the European Globalisation adjustment Fund, as currently under discussion, might be a first step in the right direction. The setting up of a new European Institute of Technology might undermine or overlap on existing structures and might therefore not be the most effective use of funds in this context. Parliament believed that the employment potential of innovative enterprises could help the EU to overcome certain difficulties posed by global competition. It called for elimination of the barriers to the mobility of researchers and for the creation of an open and competitive labour market. Qualitative value for money: Parliament u nderlined that the December 2005 agreement of the European Council had clearly shown that the battle for resources had begun. Council figures would mean a decrease of resources available between 2007 - 2013 by over 15% as compared to what the Commission thought necessary in its original proposal. It was therefore absolutely necessary in this situation to start looking at the quality of EU expenditure. Parliament proposed asking for cost-benefit studies to be carried out on specific areas of the budget by using part of the resources allocated to the parliamentary committees in order to assess the regularity (compliance with the Financial Regulation, financial reporting system) and the performance (efficiency of resources, effectiveness of the projects, administrative cost) of the policies as implemented, and to draw the political conclusions of such evaluations. The Commission should take immediate action to improve the effectiveness of administrative management, including the revised proposal for the Financial Regulation, with regard to the implementation of Community programmes for its own services, Member States and final beneficiaries, especially as regards small-scale projects. A thorough analysis of the effectiveness of the administrative management of Community legislation should be made on each of these four levels. Preparing for the 2008/2009 Review: Parliament s tressed that at internal and external level, the Common Agricultural Policy should be adjusted to the future needs. It drew attention in this context to compulsory co-financing, increased market orientation, a level playing field and the abolition of export subsidies as favourable options. The 2007 budget, as the first budget of the next period, represented an opportunity to launch the new programmes within the scope of adjustments to new needs which might appear in the first part of the period. The review of all aspects of EU spending and resources planned for 2008 will offer a real opportunity to have a close look at the ways in which public money is spent. European governance: Human and financial resources for 2007: T he proliferation of agencies, as seen over the past ten years, will undoubtedly have negative consequences for the funding of the operational programmes. Parliament considered a value-for-money approach towards the decentralised agencies as opposed to centralised activities an absolute necessity. Parliament welcomed the efforts made by the Commission in terms of redeployment between and within departments in order to optimise resources. It invited the Commission to assess carefully if further possibilities for redeployment could be found before presenting the PDB in order to reduce the number of new recruitments.
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
BUDG/6/33298
New
  • BUDG/6/33298
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.70.60 Previous annual budgets
New
8.70.60
Previous annual budgets
activities/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2716 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2006-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0122/COM_COM(2006)0122_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52006DC0122:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2006)0122 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
  • date: 2006-04-25T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ELLES James body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-04-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-154&language=EN type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading title: A6-0154/2006 body: EP type: Budgetary report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
  • date: 2006-05-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ELLES James body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARTIN David body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-05-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060517&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4667&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-221 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0221/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2005-12-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: SZENT-IVÁNYI István
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: BUDG date: 2006-01-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: ELLES James
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: SCHRÖDER Jürgen
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2006-01-25T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PSE name: MARTIN David
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/budget/ title: Budget
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
BUDG/6/33298
reference
2006/2020(BUD)
title
2007 budget: Commission's annual strategic priorities
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Budgetary preparation
type
BUD - Budgetary procedure
subject
8.70.60 Previous annual budgets