BETA


2006/2079(INI) Budget aid for developing countries

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE GAHLER Michael (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion FEMM
Committee Opinion BUDG GRÄSSLE Ingeborg (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/04/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/03/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/02/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/02/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by a show of hands a resolution based on the own-initiative report drawn up by Michael Gahler (EPP-ED, DE) on budget aid for developing countries. It called on the Commission and the Member States to use budget support only if the net benefits of such a mechanism could be demonstrated in the light of clearly objectifiable criteria, and only after a full assessment of the risks involved. Budget support must focus, as far as possible, on poverty reduction development priorities. Those priorities must be given a central role in the donor-recipient policy dialogue and parliamentary scrutiny must be ensured in respect of both the donor and the recipient.

Parliament was concerned about the decision to use budget support in Malawi, where there w ere considerable known risks, and Kenya, in regard to which all Member States have suspended budget support, thus calling into question the Commission's ability to use this instrument effectively. It was also concerned by the findings of the Court of Auditors that, in some cases, the Commission's reasons for granting budget support to countries with poor public financial management systems were insufficient.

Parliament expressed alarm that the Court of Auditors had found inadequacies in the Commission's overall coherence of the budget support instrument and in the controls and monitoring and support for the recipient countries' own budgetary scrutiny mechanisms, namely the parliaments and supreme audit institutions of the countries concerned. Technical assistance was being underused. All of these elements were indispensable to the instrument.

Whilst recognising that there could only be one macro-economic reform programme in any given country, which is usually directed by the international financial institutions, Parliament felt nevertheless that the Commission and Member States should seek to play an active role in an effort to influence policy.

It reaffirmed that 20% of total annual commitments should be allocated to activities in the sectors of basic and secondary education and basic health (including sexual and reproductive health). The Commission was asked to do the following:

- apply the new international performance measurement framework in order to assess a country's public financial management, as established by PEFA;

- react coherently and even-handedly when countries cease to respect the principles of democracy and human rights;

- assess the prevalence and risks posed by corruption, in line with the Cotonou Partnership Agreement;

- maintain its strong focus on equity and poverty reduction, concentrating on the most marginalised and poor amongst society;

- support capacity development in statistics, data collection, quality assessment and analysis. Parliament was concerned about the difficulty inherent in assessing the achievement of performance indicators and especially poverty impact results;

- verify at regular intervals that the economic policies of the recipient countries were in accordance with the objectives and principles of the development assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled;

- assess the effectiveness of budget aid in combating poverty from the point of view of cost-effectiveness, and show progress made by the third-country beneficiaries in independently administering the budget aid;

- state how budget aid could be limited in time. Parliament noted that the ultimate aim of budget support must be to build up the self-sufficiency of the beneficiary country, so the Commission should state over what (reasonable) timescale this can be achieved.

The Commission, Member States and the beneficiary countries were asked to provide regular information to the general public in this sector, in order to make the impact of budget aid visible to the European taxpayer. Such information should raise awareness of the need for development cooperation in general and the effects of budget support in particular, and counter general allegations of misuse of funds.

Lastly, Parliament insisted that, in order to support the beneficiary countries’ own budgetary control mechanisms, the parliament of any given beneficiary country should participate in adopting the budget, and the budget law should be published; insists further that budget aid should be evaluated annually by the parliament in terms of the progress achieved.

Documents
2007/02/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/02/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/01/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/01/22
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/12/18
   EP - Vote in committee
2006/12/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/09/27
   EP - GRÄSSLE Ingeborg (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2006/09/07
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/06/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/04/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/04/06
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2005/10/05
   EP - GAHLER Michael (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE

Documents

  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)1730
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)1040
  • Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
  • Decision by Parliament: T6-0043/2007
  • Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0005/2007
  • Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0005/2007
  • Committee opinion: PE380.756
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE378.564
  • Committee draft report: PE376.379
  • Committee draft report: PE376.379
  • Amendments tabled in committee: PE378.564
  • Committee opinion: PE380.756
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0005/2007
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)1040
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)1730

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/associated
Old
True
New
 
committees/1
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/2
Old
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
New
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-380756_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13213&j=1&l=en
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13213&j=0&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.379
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE376.379
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.564
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.564
docs/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.756&secondRef=03
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0005_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0005_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2007-01-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0005_EN.html title: A6-0005/2007
events/3
date
2007-01-22T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0005_EN.html title: A6-0005/2007
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070214&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20070214&type=CRE
events/6
date
2007-02-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0043_EN.html title: T6-0043/2007
summary
events/6
date
2007-02-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0043_EN.html title: T6-0043/2007
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: GAHLER Michael date: 2005-10-05T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2005-10-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GAHLER Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
rapporteur
name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2006-09-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-5&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0005_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-5&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0005_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-43
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0043_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • date: 2006-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • date: 2007-01-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-5&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0005/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070214&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13213&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-43 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0043/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2005-10-05T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GAHLER Michael group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
BUDG
date
2006-09-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Budgets (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
date
2006-09-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2005-10-05T00:00:00
committee_full
Development (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: GAHLER Michael
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
docs
  • date: 2006-06-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.379 title: PE376.379 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.564 title: PE378.564 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.756&secondRef=03 title: PE380.756 committee: BUDG type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-01-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-5&language=EN title: A6-0005/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-03-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13213&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)1040 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2007-04-30T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13213&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)1730 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-18T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-01-22T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-5&language=EN title: A6-0005/2007
  • date: 2007-02-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13213&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-43 title: T6-0043/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted by a show of hands a resolution based on the own-initiative report drawn up by Michael Gahler (EPP-ED, DE) on budget aid for developing countries. It called on the Commission and the Member States to use budget support only if the net benefits of such a mechanism could be demonstrated in the light of clearly objectifiable criteria, and only after a full assessment of the risks involved. Budget support must focus, as far as possible, on poverty reduction development priorities. Those priorities must be given a central role in the donor-recipient policy dialogue and parliamentary scrutiny must be ensured in respect of both the donor and the recipient. Parliament was concerned about the decision to use budget support in Malawi, where there w ere considerable known risks, and Kenya, in regard to which all Member States have suspended budget support, thus calling into question the Commission's ability to use this instrument effectively. It was also concerned by the findings of the Court of Auditors that, in some cases, the Commission's reasons for granting budget support to countries with poor public financial management systems were insufficient. Parliament expressed alarm that the Court of Auditors had found inadequacies in the Commission's overall coherence of the budget support instrument and in the controls and monitoring and support for the recipient countries' own budgetary scrutiny mechanisms, namely the parliaments and supreme audit institutions of the countries concerned. Technical assistance was being underused. All of these elements were indispensable to the instrument. Whilst recognising that there could only be one macro-economic reform programme in any given country, which is usually directed by the international financial institutions, Parliament felt nevertheless that the Commission and Member States should seek to play an active role in an effort to influence policy. It reaffirmed that 20% of total annual commitments should be allocated to activities in the sectors of basic and secondary education and basic health (including sexual and reproductive health). The Commission was asked to do the following: - apply the new international performance measurement framework in order to assess a country's public financial management, as established by PEFA; - react coherently and even-handedly when countries cease to respect the principles of democracy and human rights; - assess the prevalence and risks posed by corruption, in line with the Cotonou Partnership Agreement; - maintain its strong focus on equity and poverty reduction, concentrating on the most marginalised and poor amongst society; - support capacity development in statistics, data collection, quality assessment and analysis. Parliament was concerned about the difficulty inherent in assessing the achievement of performance indicators and especially poverty impact results; - verify at regular intervals that the economic policies of the recipient countries were in accordance with the objectives and principles of the development assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled; - assess the effectiveness of budget aid in combating poverty from the point of view of cost-effectiveness, and show progress made by the third-country beneficiaries in independently administering the budget aid; - state how budget aid could be limited in time. Parliament noted that the ultimate aim of budget support must be to build up the self-sufficiency of the beneficiary country, so the Commission should state over what (reasonable) timescale this can be achieved. The Commission, Member States and the beneficiary countries were asked to provide regular information to the general public in this sector, in order to make the impact of budget aid visible to the European taxpayer. Such information should raise awareness of the need for development cooperation in general and the effects of budget support in particular, and counter general allegations of misuse of funds. Lastly, Parliament insisted that, in order to support the beneficiary countries’ own budgetary control mechanisms, the parliament of any given beneficiary country should participate in adopting the budget, and the budget law should be published; insists further that budget aid should be evaluated annually by the parliament in terms of the progress achieved.
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/6/35355
New
  • DEVE/6/35355
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
  • 6.40.12 Relations with developing countries in general
New
6.30
Development cooperation
6.40.12
Relations with developing countries in general
activities
  • date: 2006-04-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • date: 2006-12-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GAHLER Michael body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
  • date: 2007-01-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-5&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0005/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-02-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070214&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13213&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-43 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0043/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: BUDG date: 2006-09-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Budgets (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GRÄSSLE Ingeborg
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2005-10-05T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GAHLER Michael
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality committee: FEMM
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/6/35355
reference
2006/2079(INI)
title
Budget aid for developing countries
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject