BETA


2006/2115(INI) Accession of Romania

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET MOSCOVICI Pierre (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion PETI
Committee Opinion REGI
Committee Opinion AFCO
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion CULT
Committee Opinion PECH
Committee Opinion AGRI
Committee Opinion ENVI
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion BUDG
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion CONT
Committee Opinion LIBE GÁL Kinga (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion INTA
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion FEMM KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/02/13
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2006/11/30
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2006/11/30
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based the own-initiative report drawn up by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. The resolution was adopted by 542 votes in favour to 41 against with 27 abstentions. (For a summary of the report, please refer to the document dated 23/11/2006.)

Documents
2006/11/30
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2006/11/29
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2006/11/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2006/11/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2006/11/23
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania . The committee welcomed the accession of Romania on 1 January 2007. The Romanian authorities were congratulated on the extensive progress made in a short space of time, but they were also reminded to keep up the pace of reform after accession. MEPs encouraged the other EU Member States to open up their borders to Romanian workers, "in accordance with the full spirit of the right of free movement of workers guaranteed by Community law".

As regards the political criteria, the committee recognised the progress made on minorities, but said that the law on minorities should be approved as soon as possible and that efforts in areas such as the integration of minorities, child protection and the treatment of the mentally handicapped should be stepped up. With regard to the Roma minority, Romania was urged to consolidate the reforms it has undertaken and to ensure adequate funding. On the Hungarian minority, MEPs said that adequate funding should be provided for the improvement of education standards.

The committee noted that the Commission had also evoked the need for further progress in the fight against corruption, the absorption and management of EU agricultural and structural funds and the application of EU legislation on food safety. Moreover, Romania should speed up the processing of claims relating to the restitution of properties confiscated by the communist regime and should make further efforts in protecting the environment, with special reference to large-scale mining projects such as Rosia Montana. Finally, MEPs insisted that the Commission should report systematically to Parliament on the progress made by Romania in the coming months and that Parliament should be closely associated in the monitoring mechanism after accession.

2006/11/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/11/10
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/10/25
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/10/04
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2006/09/26
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s follow-up report on the state of preparedness of Romania and Bulgaria for EU membership.

CONTENT: to recall, in its report of May 2006, the Commission stated that both countries should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they addressed a number of outstanding issues. The Commission indicated that it would report again on the state of preparedness of both countries by early October.

This report outlines the Commission's assessment of both countries' progress since May 2006. It confirms that Bulgaria and Romania have made further progress to complete their preparations for membership, demonstrating their capacity to apply EU principles and legislation from 1 January 2007. They have reached a high degree of alignment. However, the Commission also identifies a number of areas of continuing concern, and also areas where the Commission will initiate appropriate measures to ensure the proper functioning of the EU, unless the countries take immediate corrective action. Both countries are strongly encouraged to make proper use of the months before accession, in order to address the remaining issues.

The report focuses primarily on the areas highlighted in the conclusion of the May 2006 report as needing immediate action or further efforts.

For Bulgaria , these are the justice system, the fight against corruption, police cooperation and the fight against organised crime, money-laundering, integrated administrative control system for agriculture (IACS), transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), and financial control.

For Romania , these are the justice system and the fight against corruption and IACS, Paying Agencies, TSE and interconnectivity of tax systems.

Many of the challenges set out in the May reports have now been addressed. A number of sectoral issues have been resolved. There has been some progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption , money-laundering and organised crime , but further tangible results are needed .

This report identifies those issues which require further work. It draws attention to provisions in the acquis and the Accession Treaty which are designed to safeguard the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions following accession. In line with the findings of this report, the Commission, after consulting the Member States, will set up a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption, money-laundering and organised crime. For this purpose, benchmarks have been established which refer to the particular circumstances of each country.

The Commission has adopted the necessary legal provisions to ensure the proper management of EU agricultural funds. The report underlines that the existing rules contain the necessary guarantees for the proper management of EU structural funds , and other programmes.

In the area of food safety , some specific measures are in place. At present, certain animals and animal products may not be exported from Bulgaria and Romania to the EU because of the presence of animal diseases. These restrictions will be maintained after accession, if necessary.

In the area of aviation safety , particular measures will be needed for Bulgarian aircraft and carriers.

General conclusions : overall, Bulgaria and Romania have made far-reaching efforts to adapt their legislation and administration to the laws and rules of the European Union. This has largely brought them into line with prevailing standards and practices within the European Union. Sustained support from the European Union will be available for addressing the remaining issues. Sufficient guarantees exist in the acquis and the Accession Treaty to ensure the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions. As a result of the progress made, Bulgaria and Romania will be in a position to take on the rights and obligations of EU membership on 1 January 2007. The Commission looks forward to welcoming Bulgaria and Romania as fully-fledged members of the European Union on this date.

2006/06/22
   EP - KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2006/06/20
   EP - GÁL Kinga (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2006/05/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/05/16
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present the monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007.

CONTENT : this monitoring report follows up on the findings of the October 2005 report on the state of preparedness of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Union (please refer to INI/2005/2204 and INI/2005/2205 ). It is based on the detailed assessment contained in the accompanying Monitoring Reports for each country ( SEC(2006)0596 for Romania and SEC(2006)0595 for Bulgaria in procedure reference INI/2006/2114 ).

More specifically, in this report, the Commission:

– reviews, as of end April 2006, developments and the preparedness of both countries in areas previously identified as in need of further improvement;

– examines measures required to remedy any shortcomings that might persist upon accession;

– draws conclusions on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania.

Conditional accession in 2007 : Bulgaria and Romania have continued to make progress in their preparations for membership. In many areas the countries are generally meeting their commitments or are on track to fulfil the acquis requirements. However, a number of outstanding issues still need to be addressed. Some of these require increased efforts, and in a few cases immediate action is needed.

In the light of the overall progress made by Bulgaria and Romania assessed in the accompanying Monitoring Reports and summarised in this communication, the Commission considers that Bulgaria and Romania should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they address a number of outstanding issues. An impartial, independent and effective justice system properly equipped to fight corruption and organised crime is of paramount importance , as it underpins the functioning of the whole society and economy. In this regard:

- Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clear evidence of results in the fight against corruption, in particular high-level corruption, notably in terms of investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It needs to further reform the judiciary, in particular to reinforce its transparency, efficiency and impartiality, and remove any ambiguity regarding its independence;

- Romania needs to continue its efforts and demonstrate further results in the fight against corruption, notably in terms of further investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It also needs to consolidate the implementation of the ongoing judicial reforms, and further enhance the transparency, efficiency and impartiality of the judiciary.

Other more specific demands are made of these two countries :

Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clearer evidence of results in the following areas:

investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; implement more effectively and efficiently laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; intensify the enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; set up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; strengthen financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds.

In addition, Romania needs to:

accredit paying agencies for handling common agriculture policy expenditure; set up a proper integrated administration and control system in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; ensure that the tax administration IT systems are ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market.

Safeguards and other measures : i t is the responsibility of the authorities of both countries to take all the necessary measures to address the outstanding issues identified in this Report, so as to be able to carry out their obligations under the acquis upon accession. This concerns mainly the areas giving rise to serious concern, but also areas identified in this report as requiring increased efforts.

Failure to do so would lead the Commission to take the necessary preventive or remedial action to safeguard the functioning of EU policies. This part sets out the safeguards and other measures which could be imposed in the event of certain shortcomings not having been adequately addressed upon accession. These are outlined in three broad areas:

Internal market : a certain number of safeguard clauses are provided in this area in the event that Bulgaria or Romania are not able to abide by all its obligations upon accession. The Accession Treaty safeguard can be taken up to three years after accession. Other instruments, such as the infringement procedure, and the enforcement mechanisms for competition rules, may also be applied. This section covers both the four freedoms, and the EU policies on competition, energy, transport, environment, telecommunication, taxation, agriculture and consumer and health protection insofar as they have cross-border effects. Regarding transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, if no progress is made in rendering collection and treatment facilities to be fit, the Commission will take a decision on the basis of the acquis in order to prevent the related animal products awaiting treatment from returning into the feed chain. The EU framework for VAT and excise duties foresees computerised systems interconnected within the EC data systems. Romania's preparations need to be accelerated to ensure that its IT systems are fully operational and ready for interconnection upon accession. Justice, freedom and security : this remains principal problem area. The Accession Treaty provides for safeguard measures for up to three years from accession, in the event that Bulgaria or Romania is not able to abide by its obligations pertaining to judicial co-operation. If implementation of reforms in the justice system is not sufficiently advanced in either country before accession, or if the fight against corruption in the judiciary has not yielded sufficient tangible results, the Commission will establish on the basis of Article 38 of the Act of Accession a mechanism for further monitoring in this area. The mechanism would be in place for up to three years and would require a yearly report to the Commission on progress in implementing reforms in the judiciary and in related law enforcement bodies, and on anti-corruption measures affecting them. The decision establishing the mechanism would contain benchmarks tailored to the specific shortcomings observed in each country, and against which progress will be measured. The Commission would report yearly on the results of the mechanism to the European Parliament and Council. Should either country fail to address shortcomings adequately, the Commission would adopt safeguard measures suspending obligations of the current Member States to automatically recognise judgements or execute warrants issued by that country's courts or prosecutors. Disbursement of EU funds : a Member State needs to offer the necessary guarantees on proper spending of EU funds under shared management, i.e. the Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Any shortcoming in this respect may delay the disbursement of funds or give rise to subsequent claims by the Commission for financial corrections or recovery. In the area of agriculture, accredited paying agencies as well as a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) are necessary for handling direct payments to farmers and operators. In Romania, the paying agencies are not fully operational and accredited. A proper IACS is not set up in Bulgaria and Romania. If this is not remedied, in addition to the existing mechanisms, the Commission may take measures based on Article 37 of the Act of Accession to withhold payments to Bulgaria or Romania. Implementation of EU structural actions requires effective programming and monitoring structures, as well as financial management and control systems, including for procurement. Bulgaria's preparations for the control over structural funds expenditure need improvement. If these are not remedied, this would delay the release of payments by the Commission.

Conclusions and subsequent steps : the Commission is firmly committed to ensuring that both countries successfully complete their final preparations for accession. To that end, it has closely monitored the progress made by Bulgaria and Romania and has provided targeted support to help them in their reform efforts. Although both countries can be commended on their achievements, the Commission makes clear that, if shortcomings persist upon accession, it will take the necessary action in its role as guardian of the treaties and propose safeguard measures as mentioned above.

It will report on Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in addressing the outstanding issues no later than early October 2006 . On this basis, the Commission will consider whether the date of their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 can be maintained .

To conclude, the Commission recalls that the Accession Treaty provides that Bulgaria and Romania will join in 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a recommendation from the Commission, to postpone the accession of either country until 2008. The Council may so decide:

– by qualified majority, if serious shortcomings have been observed in the fulfilment by Romania of one or more of a number of the specific commitments and requirements related to justice and home affairs and competition policy, listed in Annex IX to the Act of Accession, or

– by unanimity, if there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either country being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas.

2006/05/16
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

PURPOSE: to present the 2006 Commission’s monitoring report on the state of preparedness of Romania in light of the accession process.

CONTEXT: the accession negotiations with Romania were successfully concluded in December 2004. The Accession Treaty was signed in April 2005. Romania and 14 Member States have already ratified it. The Treaty envisages accession on 1 January 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a Commission recommendation, to postpone it until 1 January 2008. Following the conclusion of the negotiations, the European Union decided that it would continue closely to monitor Romania's preparations and achievements and that, to this end, the Commission would continue to submit annual reports on Romania's progress towards accession, together with recommendations, if appropriate.

The Commission presented its first such report in October 2005. This report showed that Romania was already well advanced in preparing for accession. It also identified a number of areas where further efforts were needed to complete preparations. The Commission decided to step up its monitoring activities and report again in spring 2006.

CONTENT: this report reviews Romania’s preparations for membership, focusing on the areas in need of further improvement in the light of the three Copenhagen accession criteria. Accordingly, the report contains three main parts:

• The 1 st part assesses political issues which were identified as in need of further improvement.

• The 2 nd part assesses economic issues which were identified as in need of further improvement.

• The 3 rd part assesses where Romania stands in implementing commitments and requirements arising from the accession negotiations.

The report identifies the progress made since October 2005 and the gaps in policies, legislation and implementation which remain to be addressed.

General evaluation

Romania has reached a considerable degree of alignment with the acquis. The October 2005 report concluded that Romania would be ready by accession in a large number of areas. A number of other areas required increased efforts, and 14 areas gave rise to serious concern.

Since then, further progress has been made. Romania should be ready by accession in the following additional areas if the current pace of progress is maintained: public procurement, protection of personal data; animal welfare; fisheries resource, fleet, control and market policies; regional policy legislation; visa policy; customs preparations; and protection of the EU's financial interests.

Progress has also been made in a number of areas, which no longer give rise to serious concern but still require increased efforts to complete preparations: protection of intellectual property rights; veterinary border inspection posts and animal identification and registration, animal diseases control measures, and veterinary aspects of public health; institutional and financial management structures for regional policy regional policy; industrial pollution prevention and control; Schengen preparations and management of the future EU external borders; fight against fraud and corruption.

Increased efforts are also needed for: industrial product horizontal and procedural measures; product requirements under the old approach including the production and marketing of GMOs; EU citizens' rights; freedom to provide non-financial services; capital requirements for banks and investment funds, motor insurance; fight against money laundering; State aid control and steel restructuring programmes implementation; most agriculture common market organisations, quality policy, agriculture trade mechanisms, zootechnics, animal nutrition, trade in live animals and animal products; structural actions in fisheries; VAT, direct taxation; labour law, occupational health and safety, social dialogue, social inclusion, equal treatment of women and men, the European Social Fund; public health; Community Youth programme; audio-visual policy; regional policy monitoring; horizontal environmental legislation, nature protection, waste management, water quality, police co-operation and fight against organised crime, judicial co-operation, fight against drugs; public internal financial control, external audit and control over structural actions expenditure; the translation of the acquis into Romanian.

There remain four areas of serious concern , which require urgent action:

§ fully operational paying agencies accredited for handling direct payments to farmers and operators, building on progress made, under the common agriculture policy;

§ setting up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture, building on progress made;

§ building-up of rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products;

§ tax administration IT systems ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market.

2006/05/16
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2006/05/15
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to present the monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007.

CONTENT : this monitoring report follows up on the findings of the October 2005 report on the state of preparedness of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Union (please refer to INI/2005/2204 and INI/2005/2205 ). It is based on the detailed assessment contained in the accompanying Monitoring Reports for each country ( SEC(2006)0596 for Romania and SEC(2006)0595 for Bulgaria in procedure reference INI/2006/2114 ).

More specifically, in this report, the Commission:

– reviews, as of end April 2006, developments and the preparedness of both countries in areas previously identified as in need of further improvement;

– examines measures required to remedy any shortcomings that might persist upon accession;

– draws conclusions on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania.

Conditional accession in 2007 : Bulgaria and Romania have continued to make progress in their preparations for membership. In many areas the countries are generally meeting their commitments or are on track to fulfil the acquis requirements. However, a number of outstanding issues still need to be addressed. Some of these require increased efforts, and in a few cases immediate action is needed.

In the light of the overall progress made by Bulgaria and Romania assessed in the accompanying Monitoring Reports and summarised in this communication, the Commission considers that Bulgaria and Romania should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they address a number of outstanding issues. An impartial, independent and effective justice system properly equipped to fight corruption and organised crime is of paramount importance , as it underpins the functioning of the whole society and economy. In this regard:

- Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clear evidence of results in the fight against corruption, in particular high-level corruption, notably in terms of investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It needs to further reform the judiciary, in particular to reinforce its transparency, efficiency and impartiality, and remove any ambiguity regarding its independence;

- Romania needs to continue its efforts and demonstrate further results in the fight against corruption, notably in terms of further investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It also needs to consolidate the implementation of the ongoing judicial reforms, and further enhance the transparency, efficiency and impartiality of the judiciary.

Other more specific demands are made of these two countries :

Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clearer evidence of results in the following areas:

investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; implement more effectively and efficiently laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; intensify the enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; set up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; strengthen financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds.

In addition, Romania needs to:

accredit paying agencies for handling common agriculture policy expenditure; set up a proper integrated administration and control system in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; ensure that the tax administration IT systems are ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market.

Safeguards and other measures : i t is the responsibility of the authorities of both countries to take all the necessary measures to address the outstanding issues identified in this Report, so as to be able to carry out their obligations under the acquis upon accession. This concerns mainly the areas giving rise to serious concern, but also areas identified in this report as requiring increased efforts.

Failure to do so would lead the Commission to take the necessary preventive or remedial action to safeguard the functioning of EU policies. This part sets out the safeguards and other measures which could be imposed in the event of certain shortcomings not having been adequately addressed upon accession. These are outlined in three broad areas:

Internal market : a certain number of safeguard clauses are provided in this area in the event that Bulgaria or Romania are not able to abide by all its obligations upon accession. The Accession Treaty safeguard can be taken up to three years after accession. Other instruments, such as the infringement procedure, and the enforcement mechanisms for competition rules, may also be applied. This section covers both the four freedoms, and the EU policies on competition, energy, transport, environment, telecommunication, taxation, agriculture and consumer and health protection insofar as they have cross-border effects. Regarding transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, if no progress is made in rendering collection and treatment facilities to be fit, the Commission will take a decision on the basis of the acquis in order to prevent the related animal products awaiting treatment from returning into the feed chain. The EU framework for VAT and excise duties foresees computerised systems interconnected within the EC data systems. Romania's preparations need to be accelerated to ensure that its IT systems are fully operational and ready for interconnection upon accession. Justice, freedom and security : this remains principal problem area. The Accession Treaty provides for safeguard measures for up to three years from accession, in the event that Bulgaria or Romania is not able to abide by its obligations pertaining to judicial co-operation. If implementation of reforms in the justice system is not sufficiently advanced in either country before accession, or if the fight against corruption in the judiciary has not yielded sufficient tangible results, the Commission will establish on the basis of Article 38 of the Act of Accession a mechanism for further monitoring in this area. The mechanism would be in place for up to three years and would require a yearly report to the Commission on progress in implementing reforms in the judiciary and in related law enforcement bodies, and on anti-corruption measures affecting them. The decision establishing the mechanism would contain benchmarks tailored to the specific shortcomings observed in each country, and against which progress will be measured. The Commission would report yearly on the results of the mechanism to the European Parliament and Council. Should either country fail to address shortcomings adequately, the Commission would adopt safeguard measures suspending obligations of the current Member States to automatically recognise judgements or execute warrants issued by that country's courts or prosecutors. Disbursement of EU funds : a Member State needs to offer the necessary guarantees on proper spending of EU funds under shared management, i.e. the Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Any shortcoming in this respect may delay the disbursement of funds or give rise to subsequent claims by the Commission for financial corrections or recovery. In the area of agriculture, accredited paying agencies as well as a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) are necessary for handling direct payments to farmers and operators. In Romania, the paying agencies are not fully operational and accredited. A proper IACS is not set up in Bulgaria and Romania. If this is not remedied, in addition to the existing mechanisms, the Commission may take measures based on Article 37 of the Act of Accession to withhold payments to Bulgaria or Romania. Implementation of EU structural actions requires effective programming and monitoring structures, as well as financial management and control systems, including for procurement. Bulgaria's preparations for the control over structural funds expenditure need improvement. If these are not remedied, this would delay the release of payments by the Commission.

Conclusions and subsequent steps : the Commission is firmly committed to ensuring that both countries successfully complete their final preparations for accession. To that end, it has closely monitored the progress made by Bulgaria and Romania and has provided targeted support to help them in their reform efforts. Although both countries can be commended on their achievements, the Commission makes clear that, if shortcomings persist upon accession, it will take the necessary action in its role as guardian of the treaties and propose safeguard measures as mentioned above.

It will report on Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in addressing the outstanding issues no later than early October 2006 . On this basis, the Commission will consider whether the date of their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 can be maintained .

To conclude, the Commission recalls that the Accession Treaty provides that Bulgaria and Romania will join in 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a recommendation from the Commission, to postpone the accession of either country until 2008. The Council may so decide:

– by qualified majority, if serious shortcomings have been observed in the fulfilment by Romania of one or more of a number of the specific commitments and requirements related to justice and home affairs and competition policy, listed in Annex IX to the Act of Accession, or

– by unanimity, if there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either country being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas.

2005/01/18
   EP - MOSCOVICI Pierre (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Votes

Rapport Moscovici A6-0421/2006 - par. 10 #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 322, -: 265, 0: 17
PL FR CZ DK LT SE ES FI PT NL BE EE LV CY LU IT GB SI SK MT AT HU EL IE DE
Total
45
58
21
12
12
18
36
12
19
24
21
5
7
5
6
60
68
6
12
4
16
21
17
11
88
icon: PSE PSE
161

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

2
6

Ireland PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Sweden ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands ALDE

Against (1)

4

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
37

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3
icon: UEN UEN
34

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Latvia UEN

2
icon: NI NI
21

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3
3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Lithuania PPE-DE

2
4

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Rapport Moscovici A6-0421/2006 - cons. C #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 538, -: 55, 0: 14
DE IT FR ES PL BE NL CZ HU PT SE AT EL GB LT IE FI DK SK LV SI LU CY EE MT
Total
90
59
61
34
45
22
23
20
21
19
18
17
17
69
12
11
12
11
12
7
7
6
5
5
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
227
2
4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PSE PSE
161

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
75

Spain ALDE

1
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: NI NI
21
3

Poland NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

3

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Rapport Moscovici A6-0421/2006 - résolution #

2006/11/30 Outcome: +: 542, -: 41, 0: 27
DE IT FR PL GB ES HU CZ BE PT AT EL LT SE NL FI SK IE DK LV SI LU CY EE MT
Total
91
60
61
45
68
35
21
21
22
19
17
17
12
18
23
12
12
11
12
7
6
6
5
5
4
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229
2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
160

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
76

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
34

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
21
3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

1

Belgium NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0596/COM_SEC(2006)0596_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0596/COM_SEC(2006)0596_EN.pdf
docs/2
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
docs
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/2
date
2006-09-26T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf
docs/3
date
2006-09-26T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Follow-up document
body
EC
docs/3
date
2006-10-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.628
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
docs/4
date
2006-10-04T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.628
committee
FEMM
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-376628_EN.html
docs/6
date
2006-11-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE378.563
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7
date
2006-11-22T00:00:00
docs
title: PE378.563
committee
LIBE
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/7/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-378563_EN.html
docs/8
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)0329/3
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/8/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13007&j=0&l=en
docs/9
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)0329/3
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
events/0
date
2006-05-15T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2006-05-16T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
docs/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.628&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.160
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE374.160
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.786
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE380.786
docs/6/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.563&secondRef=02
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0421_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0421_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2006-11-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0421_EN.html title: A6-0421/2006
events/3
date
2006-11-27T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0421_EN.html title: A6-0421/2006
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE
events/6
date
2006-11-30T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0512_EN.html title: T6-0512/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based the own-initiative report drawn up by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. The resolution was adopted by 542 votes in favour to 41 against with 27 abstentions. (For a summary of the report, please refer to the document dated 23/11/2006.)
events/6
date
2006-11-30T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0512_EN.html title: T6-0512/2006
summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution based the own-initiative report drawn up by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. The resolution was adopted by 542 votes in favour to 41 against with 27 abstentions. (For a summary of the report, please refer to the document dated 23/11/2006.)
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: MOSCOVICI Pierre date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOSCOVICI Pierre group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
rapporteur
name: GÁL Kinga date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2006-06-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GÁL Kinga group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-421&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0421_EN.html
docs/8/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-421&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2006-0421_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-512
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0512_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0214 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52006DC0214:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement Commissioner: REHN Olli type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GÁL Kinga body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GÁL Kinga body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-421&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0421/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13007&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-512 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0512/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: REHN Olli
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MOSCOVICI Pierre group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2005-01-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgets
committee
BUDG
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Budgetary Control
committee
CONT
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
opinion
False
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/9
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/9
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
committees/10
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/10
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi
committees/11
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
opinion
False
committees/11
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/12
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
opinion
False
committees/12
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
committees/13
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
opinion
False
committees/13
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/14
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
opinion
False
committees/14
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/15
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/15
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
LIBE
date
2006-06-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: GÁL Kinga
committees/16
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
date
2006-06-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GÁL Kinga group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/16
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Fisheries
committee
PECH
committees/17
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Constitutional Affairs
committee
AFCO
opinion
False
committees/17
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
committees/18
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2006-06-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/18
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
committees/19
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Petitions
committee
PETI
opinion
False
committees/19
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
docs
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0596/COM_SEC(2006)0596_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)0596 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=596 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present the 2006 Commission’s monitoring report on the state of preparedness of Romania in light of the accession process. CONTEXT: the accession negotiations with Romania were successfully concluded in December 2004. The Accession Treaty was signed in April 2005. Romania and 14 Member States have already ratified it. The Treaty envisages accession on 1 January 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a Commission recommendation, to postpone it until 1 January 2008. Following the conclusion of the negotiations, the European Union decided that it would continue closely to monitor Romania's preparations and achievements and that, to this end, the Commission would continue to submit annual reports on Romania's progress towards accession, together with recommendations, if appropriate. The Commission presented its first such report in October 2005. This report showed that Romania was already well advanced in preparing for accession. It also identified a number of areas where further efforts were needed to complete preparations. The Commission decided to step up its monitoring activities and report again in spring 2006. CONTENT: this report reviews Romania’s preparations for membership, focusing on the areas in need of further improvement in the light of the three Copenhagen accession criteria. Accordingly, the report contains three main parts: • The 1 st part assesses political issues which were identified as in need of further improvement. • The 2 nd part assesses economic issues which were identified as in need of further improvement. • The 3 rd part assesses where Romania stands in implementing commitments and requirements arising from the accession negotiations. The report identifies the progress made since October 2005 and the gaps in policies, legislation and implementation which remain to be addressed. General evaluation Romania has reached a considerable degree of alignment with the acquis. The October 2005 report concluded that Romania would be ready by accession in a large number of areas. A number of other areas required increased efforts, and 14 areas gave rise to serious concern. Since then, further progress has been made. Romania should be ready by accession in the following additional areas if the current pace of progress is maintained: public procurement, protection of personal data; animal welfare; fisheries resource, fleet, control and market policies; regional policy legislation; visa policy; customs preparations; and protection of the EU's financial interests. Progress has also been made in a number of areas, which no longer give rise to serious concern but still require increased efforts to complete preparations: protection of intellectual property rights; veterinary border inspection posts and animal identification and registration, animal diseases control measures, and veterinary aspects of public health; institutional and financial management structures for regional policy regional policy; industrial pollution prevention and control; Schengen preparations and management of the future EU external borders; fight against fraud and corruption. Increased efforts are also needed for: industrial product horizontal and procedural measures; product requirements under the old approach including the production and marketing of GMOs; EU citizens' rights; freedom to provide non-financial services; capital requirements for banks and investment funds, motor insurance; fight against money laundering; State aid control and steel restructuring programmes implementation; most agriculture common market organisations, quality policy, agriculture trade mechanisms, zootechnics, animal nutrition, trade in live animals and animal products; structural actions in fisheries; VAT, direct taxation; labour law, occupational health and safety, social dialogue, social inclusion, equal treatment of women and men, the European Social Fund; public health; Community Youth programme; audio-visual policy; regional policy monitoring; horizontal environmental legislation, nature protection, waste management, water quality, police co-operation and fight against organised crime, judicial co-operation, fight against drugs; public internal financial control, external audit and control over structural actions expenditure; the translation of the acquis into Romanian. There remain four areas of serious concern , which require urgent action: § fully operational paying agencies accredited for handling direct payments to farmers and operators, building on progress made, under the common agriculture policy; § setting up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture, building on progress made; § building-up of rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; § tax administration IT systems ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2006/0598/COM_SEC(2006)0598_EN.pdf title: SEC(2006)0598 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=598 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-09-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0549/COM_COM(2006)0549_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0549 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=549 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to present the Commission’s follow-up report on the state of preparedness of Romania and Bulgaria for EU membership. CONTENT: to recall, in its report of May 2006, the Commission stated that both countries should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they addressed a number of outstanding issues. The Commission indicated that it would report again on the state of preparedness of both countries by early October. This report outlines the Commission's assessment of both countries' progress since May 2006. It confirms that Bulgaria and Romania have made further progress to complete their preparations for membership, demonstrating their capacity to apply EU principles and legislation from 1 January 2007. They have reached a high degree of alignment. However, the Commission also identifies a number of areas of continuing concern, and also areas where the Commission will initiate appropriate measures to ensure the proper functioning of the EU, unless the countries take immediate corrective action. Both countries are strongly encouraged to make proper use of the months before accession, in order to address the remaining issues. The report focuses primarily on the areas highlighted in the conclusion of the May 2006 report as needing immediate action or further efforts. For Bulgaria , these are the justice system, the fight against corruption, police cooperation and the fight against organised crime, money-laundering, integrated administrative control system for agriculture (IACS), transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), and financial control. For Romania , these are the justice system and the fight against corruption and IACS, Paying Agencies, TSE and interconnectivity of tax systems. Many of the challenges set out in the May reports have now been addressed. A number of sectoral issues have been resolved. There has been some progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption , money-laundering and organised crime , but further tangible results are needed . This report identifies those issues which require further work. It draws attention to provisions in the acquis and the Accession Treaty which are designed to safeguard the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions following accession. In line with the findings of this report, the Commission, after consulting the Member States, will set up a mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption, money-laundering and organised crime. For this purpose, benchmarks have been established which refer to the particular circumstances of each country. The Commission has adopted the necessary legal provisions to ensure the proper management of EU agricultural funds. The report underlines that the existing rules contain the necessary guarantees for the proper management of EU structural funds , and other programmes. In the area of food safety , some specific measures are in place. At present, certain animals and animal products may not be exported from Bulgaria and Romania to the EU because of the presence of animal diseases. These restrictions will be maintained after accession, if necessary. In the area of aviation safety , particular measures will be needed for Bulgarian aircraft and carriers. General conclusions : overall, Bulgaria and Romania have made far-reaching efforts to adapt their legislation and administration to the laws and rules of the European Union. This has largely brought them into line with prevailing standards and practices within the European Union. Sustained support from the European Union will be available for addressing the remaining issues. Sufficient guarantees exist in the acquis and the Accession Treaty to ensure the proper functioning of EU policies and institutions. As a result of the progress made, Bulgaria and Romania will be in a position to take on the rights and obligations of EU membership on 1 January 2007. The Commission looks forward to welcoming Bulgaria and Romania as fully-fledged members of the European Union on this date. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2006-10-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE376.628&secondRef=02 title: PE376.628 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE374.160 title: PE374.160 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.786 title: PE380.786 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.563&secondRef=02 title: PE378.563 committee: LIBE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-421&language=EN title: A6-0421/2006 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13007&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)0329/3 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf title: COM(2006)0214 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=214 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present the monitoring report on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania in 2007. CONTENT : this monitoring report follows up on the findings of the October 2005 report on the state of preparedness of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the Union (please refer to INI/2005/2204 and INI/2005/2205 ). It is based on the detailed assessment contained in the accompanying Monitoring Reports for each country ( SEC(2006)0596 for Romania and SEC(2006)0595 for Bulgaria in procedure reference INI/2006/2114 ). More specifically, in this report, the Commission: – reviews, as of end April 2006, developments and the preparedness of both countries in areas previously identified as in need of further improvement; – examines measures required to remedy any shortcomings that might persist upon accession; – draws conclusions on the state of preparedness for EU membership of Bulgaria and Romania. Conditional accession in 2007 : Bulgaria and Romania have continued to make progress in their preparations for membership. In many areas the countries are generally meeting their commitments or are on track to fulfil the acquis requirements. However, a number of outstanding issues still need to be addressed. Some of these require increased efforts, and in a few cases immediate action is needed. In the light of the overall progress made by Bulgaria and Romania assessed in the accompanying Monitoring Reports and summarised in this communication, the Commission considers that Bulgaria and Romania should be prepared for membership by 1 January 2007, provided that they address a number of outstanding issues. An impartial, independent and effective justice system properly equipped to fight corruption and organised crime is of paramount importance , as it underpins the functioning of the whole society and economy. In this regard: - Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clear evidence of results in the fight against corruption, in particular high-level corruption, notably in terms of investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It needs to further reform the judiciary, in particular to reinforce its transparency, efficiency and impartiality, and remove any ambiguity regarding its independence; - Romania needs to continue its efforts and demonstrate further results in the fight against corruption, notably in terms of further investigations and subsequent judicial proceedings. It also needs to consolidate the implementation of the ongoing judicial reforms, and further enhance the transparency, efficiency and impartiality of the judiciary. Other more specific demands are made of these two countries : Bulgaria needs to demonstrate clearer evidence of results in the following areas: investigating and prosecuting organised crime networks; implement more effectively and efficiently laws for the fight against fraud and corruption; intensify the enforcement of anti-money laundering provisions; set up a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; strengthen financial control for the future use of structural and cohesion funds. In addition, Romania needs to: accredit paying agencies for handling common agriculture policy expenditure; set up a proper integrated administration and control system in agriculture; build up the necessary rendering collection and treatment facilities in line with the acquis on TSE and animal by-products; ensure that the tax administration IT systems are ready for inter-operability with those of the rest of the Union, to enable a correct collection of VAT throughout the EU internal market. Safeguards and other measures : i t is the responsibility of the authorities of both countries to take all the necessary measures to address the outstanding issues identified in this Report, so as to be able to carry out their obligations under the acquis upon accession. This concerns mainly the areas giving rise to serious concern, but also areas identified in this report as requiring increased efforts. Failure to do so would lead the Commission to take the necessary preventive or remedial action to safeguard the functioning of EU policies. This part sets out the safeguards and other measures which could be imposed in the event of certain shortcomings not having been adequately addressed upon accession. These are outlined in three broad areas: Internal market : a certain number of safeguard clauses are provided in this area in the event that Bulgaria or Romania are not able to abide by all its obligations upon accession. The Accession Treaty safeguard can be taken up to three years after accession. Other instruments, such as the infringement procedure, and the enforcement mechanisms for competition rules, may also be applied. This section covers both the four freedoms, and the EU policies on competition, energy, transport, environment, telecommunication, taxation, agriculture and consumer and health protection insofar as they have cross-border effects. Regarding transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, if no progress is made in rendering collection and treatment facilities to be fit, the Commission will take a decision on the basis of the acquis in order to prevent the related animal products awaiting treatment from returning into the feed chain. The EU framework for VAT and excise duties foresees computerised systems interconnected within the EC data systems. Romania's preparations need to be accelerated to ensure that its IT systems are fully operational and ready for interconnection upon accession. Justice, freedom and security : this remains principal problem area. The Accession Treaty provides for safeguard measures for up to three years from accession, in the event that Bulgaria or Romania is not able to abide by its obligations pertaining to judicial co-operation. If implementation of reforms in the justice system is not sufficiently advanced in either country before accession, or if the fight against corruption in the judiciary has not yielded sufficient tangible results, the Commission will establish on the basis of Article 38 of the Act of Accession a mechanism for further monitoring in this area. The mechanism would be in place for up to three years and would require a yearly report to the Commission on progress in implementing reforms in the judiciary and in related law enforcement bodies, and on anti-corruption measures affecting them. The decision establishing the mechanism would contain benchmarks tailored to the specific shortcomings observed in each country, and against which progress will be measured. The Commission would report yearly on the results of the mechanism to the European Parliament and Council. Should either country fail to address shortcomings adequately, the Commission would adopt safeguard measures suspending obligations of the current Member States to automatically recognise judgements or execute warrants issued by that country's courts or prosecutors. Disbursement of EU funds : a Member State needs to offer the necessary guarantees on proper spending of EU funds under shared management, i.e. the Common Agricultural Policy and the Structural and Cohesion Funds. Any shortcoming in this respect may delay the disbursement of funds or give rise to subsequent claims by the Commission for financial corrections or recovery. In the area of agriculture, accredited paying agencies as well as a proper integrated administration and control system (IACS) are necessary for handling direct payments to farmers and operators. In Romania, the paying agencies are not fully operational and accredited. A proper IACS is not set up in Bulgaria and Romania. If this is not remedied, in addition to the existing mechanisms, the Commission may take measures based on Article 37 of the Act of Accession to withhold payments to Bulgaria or Romania. Implementation of EU structural actions requires effective programming and monitoring structures, as well as financial management and control systems, including for procurement. Bulgaria's preparations for the control over structural funds expenditure need improvement. If these are not remedied, this would delay the release of payments by the Commission. Conclusions and subsequent steps : the Commission is firmly committed to ensuring that both countries successfully complete their final preparations for accession. To that end, it has closely monitored the progress made by Bulgaria and Romania and has provided targeted support to help them in their reform efforts. Although both countries can be commended on their achievements, the Commission makes clear that, if shortcomings persist upon accession, it will take the necessary action in its role as guardian of the treaties and propose safeguard measures as mentioned above. It will report on Bulgaria's and Romania's progress in addressing the outstanding issues no later than early October 2006 . On this basis, the Commission will consider whether the date of their accession to the European Union on 1 January 2007 can be maintained . To conclude, the Commission recalls that the Accession Treaty provides that Bulgaria and Romania will join in 2007 unless the Council decides, upon a recommendation from the Commission, to postpone the accession of either country until 2008. The Council may so decide: – by qualified majority, if serious shortcomings have been observed in the fulfilment by Romania of one or more of a number of the specific commitments and requirements related to justice and home affairs and competition policy, listed in Annex IX to the Act of Accession, or – by unanimity, if there is clear evidence that the state of preparations for adoption and implementation of the acquis in Bulgaria or Romania is such that there is a serious risk of either country being manifestly unprepared to meet the requirements of membership by 1 January 2007 in a number of important areas.
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania . The committee welcomed the accession of Romania on 1 January 2007. The Romanian authorities were congratulated on the extensive progress made in a short space of time, but they were also reminded to keep up the pace of reform after accession. MEPs encouraged the other EU Member States to open up their borders to Romanian workers, "in accordance with the full spirit of the right of free movement of workers guaranteed by Community law". As regards the political criteria, the committee recognised the progress made on minorities, but said that the law on minorities should be approved as soon as possible and that efforts in areas such as the integration of minorities, child protection and the treatment of the mentally handicapped should be stepped up. With regard to the Roma minority, Romania was urged to consolidate the reforms it has undertaken and to ensure adequate funding. On the Hungarian minority, MEPs said that adequate funding should be provided for the improvement of education standards. The committee noted that the Commission had also evoked the need for further progress in the fight against corruption, the absorption and management of EU agricultural and structural funds and the application of EU legislation on food safety. Moreover, Romania should speed up the processing of claims relating to the restitution of properties confiscated by the communist regime and should make further efforts in protecting the environment, with special reference to large-scale mining projects such as Rosia Montana. Finally, MEPs insisted that the Commission should report systematically to Parliament on the progress made by Romania in the coming months and that Parliament should be closely associated in the monitoring mechanism after accession.
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-421&language=EN title: A6-0421/2006
  • date: 2006-11-29T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13007&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-512 title: T6-0512/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based the own-initiative report drawn up by Pierre MOSCOVICI (PES, FR) in response to the Commission's final monitoring report on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania. The resolution was adopted by 542 votes in favour to 41 against with 27 abstentions. (For a summary of the report, please refer to the document dated 23/11/2006.)
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/6/34577
New
  • AFET/6/34577
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
New
8.20.01
Candidate countries
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2006-05-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2006/0214/COM_COM(2006)0214_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52006DC0214:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2006)0214 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement Commissioner: REHN Olli
  • date: 2006-05-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GÁL Kinga body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2006-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GÁL Kinga body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2006-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2006-421&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0421/2006 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2006-11-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20061129&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2006-11-30T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13007&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-512 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0512/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Constitutional Affairs committee: AFCO
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2005-01-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: MOSCOVICI Pierre
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development committee: AGRI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgets committee: BUDG
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Budgetary Control committee: CONT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Culture and Education committee: CULT
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety committee: ENVI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2006-06-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Rodi
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: International Trade committee: INTA
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: LIBE date: 2006-06-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: GÁL Kinga
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Fisheries committee: PECH
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Petitions committee: PETI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: REHN Olli
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/6/34577
geographical_area
Romania
reference
2006/2115(INI)
title
Accession of Romania
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
8.20.01 Candidate countries