BETA


2006/2210(INI) Thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI
Committee Opinion ITRE
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/05/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/04/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/04/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Kartika Tamara LIOTARD (GUE-NGL, NL) in response to the Commission communication on a Thematic Strategy for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. It took reluctant note of the document and regretted the lack of a clear vision on how to meet the overall objective. Parliament felt that it should be seen as a first step in a process eventually leading to a comprehensive strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources. The Commission's action platform for the study of the Sustainable Development Strategy was too cautious and limited in scope and, in its present form, it would not be able to persuade the public or political decision-makers to pursue the crucial goals for which it provides. Parliament called on the Commission to establish goals and targets at political and at sectoral level for resource efficiency, and speed up the work on appropriate tools to maintain progress. Moreover, the Thematic Strategy failed to pursue the objectives of the European Community's 6th EAP.

Parliament went on to state that pollution, the increasing scarcity of natural resources and raw materials and the increasing difficulty of gaining access to them would cause price rises on such a scale as to more or less completely destabilise the economic and social systems of the EU, and will give rise to risks of conflict. The Commission must set binding targets and timetables for natural resources in the following way:

- develop and implement best practices for every production chain; and

- achieve a quantitative greenhouse gas reduction of at least 30% by 2020 and of 80% by 2050 against 1990 levels.

The Commission was also encouraged to define best practices for the major product groups, starting with the "top-ten" (defined by the Commission), to be completed within three years. The Data Centre for Natural Resources (proposed in the Thematic Strategy) must be responsible for defining best practices. Community policies must be proposed for the purpose of fostering stakeholder interaction and promote application of life-cycle assessments (LCA) and/or other methods among companies and provide information upon request; and develop CO2 targets on a national and a sectoral basis.

The EU should take the lead in the search for innovative solutions and in promoting more efficient use of resources, and it should aim to be the world leader in eco-efficient technologies. Parliament noted that the market for sustainable products would have to grow in order to meet the increasing demand from a rapidly growing 'middle class' for consumer goods and services which respect regional and global carrying capacity. While acknowledging that working towards the sustainable use of natural resources is a long-term process, Parliament felt that a time horizon of 25 years as outlined in the Commission's communication was too long.

Parliament did not agree with the Commission that no indicators are known which would enable specific, clear and time-tabled objectives to be included in the Thematic Strategy now. Indicators which are already known include GDP (Gross Domestic Product), DMI (Direct Material Input) and DMC (Domestic Material Consumption ). Other indicators as available and detailed as these would be related to various aspects of the quality of life, such as public health conditions, social inclusion, social awareness of decision-making processes and an environmental "footprint". The challenge would be to improve the quality of life by pursuing more immaterial goals with the support of information and communication technologies, and in general less demanding technologies, and therefore reducing the pressure on natural resources.

Parliament then proposed that the Commission perform within three years an assessment regarding the possibilities and the instruments for decoupling natural resource use from economic growth. The revised Thematic Strategy should include these decoupling instruments. This approach should also be implemented in the revision of existing policies. The EU should adopt a clear target for the absolute reduction of resource use, given that the analysis in the Annex to the Thematic Strategy indicates that we need to go beyond a 3% annual resource efficiency improvement, and that halving resource use in the period 2005-2030 requires almost 6% annual resource efficiency improvement. All Community instruments and legislation must contribute overall to the conservation of natural resources and the pursuit of sustainable development in the EU and countries outside the EU. The EU should encourage the establishment of resource strategies in non-EU countries, which should also be reflected in its funds and aid policy.

Market instruments and subsidies, particularly of a fiscal nature, could be used to reduce the use of environmentally damaging resources, particularly by means of a re-allocation of subsidies and by reducing in stages, but quickly, any subsidies to unsustainable activities and supporting the introduction of ecotaxes. For example, more subsidies for small-scale hydroelectric power, as well as for wind power and solar energy, would promote the use of new technologies and improve Europe's competitive position in the world, as well as reducing dependence on fossil fuels imported from other parts of the world.

Parliament proposed that targets be set for resource use reduction in the following sectors: food, housing and transport, as according to recent studies, these cause the highest negative impacts. Agricultural policy, in particular, should be geared partly to reducing pressure on the environment by means of the sustainable use of natural resources including, but not confined to, land, water and fuels. In agriculture, genuine progress needed to be made in research into ecological production methods, regulation and monitoring relating, inter alia, to the use of fertilisers, pesticides and water, promotion of short chains, internalising external costs and attaching environmental conditions to economic support. The pioneering role of organic and sustainable farming should be acknowledged and supported.

Lastly, Parliament considered that the EU should do everything possible to provide consumers and producers with proper information on the sustainable use of natural resources, and that environmental education, particularly concerning sustainable consumption, should form part of elementary education. Producers should supply information to the public on the origin and production methods of their products and services and the production chains involved.

Documents
2007/04/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/04/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/03/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/03/05
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/02/28
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn by Kartika Tamara LIOTARD (GUE-NGL, NL) in response to the Commission communication on a Thematic Strategy for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. The report was highly critical of the communication, saying that that it lacked "a clear vision" on how to meet the overall objective and that the proposed action platform would not be able "to persuade the public or political decision-makers to pursue the crucial goals for which it provides".

Noting that the Thematic Strategy fails to pursue the objectives of the European Community's 6th Environmental Action Programme, the committee called on the Commission to make the Strategy more effective, to establish goals and targets at political and sectoral level for resource efficiency as well as to speed up the work on appropriate tools to maintain progress. The Commission was also urged to set binding targets and timetables for natural resources by developing and implementing best practices for every production chain and by achieving a quantitative greenhouse gas reduction of at least 30% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 against 1990 levels.

In addition, the committee encouraged the Commission to propose Community policies in order to foster stakeholder interaction and promote application of life-cycle assessments and/or other methods among companies as well as to develop CO2 targets on national and sectoral basis. MEPs said that the EU should "aim to be the world leader in eco-efficient technologies", and stressed that R&D efforts must be geared towards our understanding of how natural systems work so as to structure production and consumption systems along biological lines, thereby improving resource productivity and reducing pollution.

Among its other recommendations, the committee urged the Commission to perform within three years an assessment of the possibilities and instruments for decoupling natural resource use from economic growth and to add other indicators for assessing the use of natural resources, based on various aspects of the quality of life, such as public health conditions, social inclusion, social awareness of the decision-making processes and an environmental 'footprint'. The report also called on the EU to ensure that all Community instruments and legislation contribute to the conservation of natural resources both within and outside the EU. For example, the Union should encourage the establishment of resource strategies in non-EU countries, which should also be reflected in its funds and aid policy. The committee also stressed that market instruments and subsidies, particularly of a fiscal nature, can be used to reduce the use of environmentally damaging resources, particularly by gradually reducing any subsidies to unsustainable activities and supporting the introduction of ecotaxes.

In addition, MEPs considered that the EU should do everything possible to provide consumers and producers with proper information on the sustainable use of natural resources and that environmental education should form part of elementary education. Lastly, the report called on the Commission to develop, within three years, a methodology to measure the environmental impact of every production chain and to monitor on a three-yearly basis the progress in improving resource efficiency.

2006/12/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2006/11/07
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2006/10/23
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted conclusions on the sustainable use of natural resources. It invites the Commission and Member States to endorse the following priorities for action:

1) Outline an ecological vision: focus efforts to outline the ecological dimension of the long-term vision anticipated in the renewed Strategy on Sustainable Development. The vision should combine sustainable use of natural resources and sustainable consumption and production with a view to the goal of increasing wellbeing while reducing the consumption of natural resources and environmental impacts related to their use. The vision should act as a catalyst for setting strategies to diminish Europe's dependency on fossil fuels and to increase resource efficiency, including material efficiency, significantly in order to break the linkage between the negative environmental impacts of consumption and the growth of the economy while at the same time creating new business opportunities by encouraging innovation.

2) Balance the use of natural resources: set targets for resource-specific impacts and eco-efficiency in order to complement the strategy by the year 2010. Targets and measures should address uses of natural resources that contribute most to negative environmental and social impacts. The focus should be to improve resource-efficiency and to decrease negative impacts, especially in crucial economic sectors such as housing, transport and food. Member States are called upon to deepen the understanding of the impacts of natural resource use throughout the whole life-cycle and as appropriate to implement national programmes and measures. The Commission is invited to facilitate the exchange of best practice and of information on national programmes for the sustainable use of natural resources at a high level with all Member States. The Council calls on the EU to take a leading initiatory role at global level towards the establishment of an international panel on natural resources under the auspices of the UNEP. The main idea of the panel should be to inform and support policy-makers globally and at EU level in questions of resource use and resource efficiency. It also recognises the importance of biodiversity for supporting ecosystems services vital to the use of natural resources and the negative impacts resource use can have on biodiversity; and underlines the importance of the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources for reaching the global target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010.

3) Find synergies between the strategy on natural resources and the action plan on sustainable consumption and production: the Council stresses that the Commission will draw up an EU Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) Action Plan by 2007. The key objectives of the action plan should be to identify concrete steps to improve eco-efficiency aiming to bring resource use and consumption patterns within national, regional and global carrying capacities.

The Council highlights the fact that, to achieve these objectives, the SCP action plan should:

§ launch targeted structured dialogues involving authorities, businesses, research institutes and NGOs to improve eco-efficiency, and formulate proactive strategies to promote best practices;

§ inspire purchasers and suppliers to seek the most cost-effective environmental technologies and solutions and to give preference to products, services and technologies with optimised resource use;

§ consider options for new market-based instruments that can also ensure that policy goals can be reached in a cost-effective way. Further progress is also needed on the elimination of environmentally harmful subsidies;

§ set long-term targets for the environmental performance of key products and services based on life-cycle thinking and encourage their uptake by business and consumers;

§ motivate Member States and the EU to set indicative targets for the funding of research and development in eco-innovations;

§ use effectively existing proactive policy tools that promote cleaner production and products, including eco-labels, environmental management systems, producer responsibility, and sustainable public procurement policies;

§ integrate natural resources concerns into all policy areas relevant to SCP, such as in the 2007 mid-term review of the Communication "Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A Policy Framework to Strengthen EU Manufacturing.

2006/10/23
   CSL - Council Meeting
2006/09/07
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2005/12/21
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE : to present a European strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources.

CONTENT : the "Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources" develops a policy framework to reduce the environmental impacts of resource use in a growing economy. It is aimed at “more value – less impact – better alternatives”:

- more value - creating more value while using less resources (increasing resource productivity);

- less impact - reducing the overall environmental impact of resources used (increasing eco-efficiency);

- better alternatives – if cleaner use cannot be achieved, substituting currently used resources with better alternatives.

This is to be achieved over the whole life cycle of resource use, avoiding that environmental impacts are shifted from one phase to another or to other countries. Since waste represents the last phase in the life cycle of a resource, the resources strategy will generate important information for the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, supporting it in reducing waste.

Taking a time horizon of 25 years, the strategy proposes a number of specific measures. They include:

- a Data Centre run by the European Commission to bring together all available knowledge on natural resources and inform decision-makers;

- an International Panel to be set up in cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to provide independent scientific advice on global aspects of resource use;

- the development of national measures and programmes by Member States under the guidance of a High Level Forum with representatives from the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders;

- the consideration of environmental impacts of resource use in economic sector action plans that the Commission intends to develop in the context of its strategy for growth and jobs;

- lastly, by 2008 the development of indicators to monitor and regularly review progress towards the strategy’s goal.

The strategy is focusing on improving knowledge, developing monitoring tools and fostering strategic approaches in specific economic sectors, Member States and internationally. The strategy is one of the seven 'thematic' strategies required under the 6 th Environment Action Programme (2002-2012) and closely linked to the waste thematic strategy. Other thematic strategies to be developed by the Commission concern air pollution and marine environment as well as soils, pesticides and the urban environment.

2005/12/21
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
2005/12/20
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE : to present a European strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources.

CONTENT : the "Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources" develops a policy framework to reduce the environmental impacts of resource use in a growing economy. It is aimed at “more value – less impact – better alternatives”:

- more value - creating more value while using less resources (increasing resource productivity);

- less impact - reducing the overall environmental impact of resources used (increasing eco-efficiency);

- better alternatives – if cleaner use cannot be achieved, substituting currently used resources with better alternatives.

This is to be achieved over the whole life cycle of resource use, avoiding that environmental impacts are shifted from one phase to another or to other countries. Since waste represents the last phase in the life cycle of a resource, the resources strategy will generate important information for the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, supporting it in reducing waste.

Taking a time horizon of 25 years, the strategy proposes a number of specific measures. They include:

- a Data Centre run by the European Commission to bring together all available knowledge on natural resources and inform decision-makers;

- an International Panel to be set up in cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to provide independent scientific advice on global aspects of resource use;

- the development of national measures and programmes by Member States under the guidance of a High Level Forum with representatives from the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders;

- the consideration of environmental impacts of resource use in economic sector action plans that the Commission intends to develop in the context of its strategy for growth and jobs;

- lastly, by 2008 the development of indicators to monitor and regularly review progress towards the strategy’s goal.

The strategy is focusing on improving knowledge, developing monitoring tools and fostering strategic approaches in specific economic sectors, Member States and internationally. The strategy is one of the seven 'thematic' strategies required under the 6 th Environment Action Programme (2002-2012) and closely linked to the waste thematic strategy. Other thematic strategies to be developed by the Commission concern air pollution and marine environment as well as soils, pesticides and the urban environment.

Documents

Votes

Rapport Liotard A6-0054/2007 - am. 3 #

2007/04/25 Outcome: -: 443, +: 154, 0: 7
LT SE NL FI CY EE LV LU DK SI MT BE IE BG AT CZ IT SK RO EL PT HU FR ES GB PL DE
Total
12
19
26
13
5
5
8
4
11
7
5
18
10
10
16
21
45
11
30
18
21
23
47
39
55
46
79
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Sweden ALDE

3

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1
2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: ITS ITS
9

Italy ITS

For (1)

1

France ITS

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
16

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

5

Poland IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1
2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
2
icon: UEN UEN
29

Lithuania UEN

2

Latvia UEN

For (1)

3

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3
icon: PSE PSE
174

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
229

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Rapport Liotard A6-0054/2007 - am. 8 #

2007/04/25 Outcome: +: 355, -: 244, 0: 12
DE CZ IT ES PT EL IE AT LV HU SK CY BE LU GB FR NL RO SI DK MT FI BG EE LT PL SE
Total
79
21
44
38
21
18
10
17
8
23
11
5
20
5
50
51
26
32
7
11
5
14
11
5
12
48
19
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
225
4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2
4

Bulgaria PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
34

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
13

Italy ITS

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ITS

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ITS

For (1)

1
3

Bulgaria ITS

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
6

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

2

Austria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Czechia IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

5

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
31

Ireland UEN

3

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
81
2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

3
icon: PSE PSE
169

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2005-12-21T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/1
date
2006-10-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE376.734
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13355&j=0&l=en
events/0
date
2005-12-20T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2005-12-21T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
committees/0/rapporteur
  • name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/1683/COM_SEC(2005)1683_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/1683/COM_SEC(2005)1683_EN.pdf
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.809
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE380.809
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.725
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE378.725
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0054_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0054_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2007-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0054_EN.html title: A6-0054/2007
events/4
date
2007-03-05T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0054_EN.html title: A6-0054/2007
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070424&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20070424&type=CRE
events/7
date
2007-04-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0154_EN.html title: T6-0154/2007
summary
events/7
date
2007-04-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0154_EN.html title: T6-0154/2007
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2005-11-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-54&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0054_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-54&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0054_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-154
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0154_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2005-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0670/COM_COM(2005)0670_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0670 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52005DC0670:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: DIMAS Stavros type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2757 council: Environment date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-02-28T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-54&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0054/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070424&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-04-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13355&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-154 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0154/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2005-11-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2005-11-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 2757 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2757*&MEET_DATE=23/10/2006 date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2005-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2005/1683/COM_SEC(2005)1683_EN.pdf title: SEC(2005)1683 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=1683 title: EUR-Lex type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2006-10-26T00:00:00 docs: title: PE376.734 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-11-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE380.809 title: PE380.809 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2006-12-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE378.725 title: PE378.725 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-54&language=EN title: A6-0054/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13355&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)2625/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2005-12-21T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0670/COM_COM(2005)0670_EN.pdf title: COM(2005)0670 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2005&nu_doc=670 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE : to present a European strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources. CONTENT : the "Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources" develops a policy framework to reduce the environmental impacts of resource use in a growing economy. It is aimed at “more value – less impact – better alternatives”: - more value - creating more value while using less resources (increasing resource productivity); - less impact - reducing the overall environmental impact of resources used (increasing eco-efficiency); - better alternatives – if cleaner use cannot be achieved, substituting currently used resources with better alternatives. This is to be achieved over the whole life cycle of resource use, avoiding that environmental impacts are shifted from one phase to another or to other countries. Since waste represents the last phase in the life cycle of a resource, the resources strategy will generate important information for the thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste, supporting it in reducing waste. Taking a time horizon of 25 years, the strategy proposes a number of specific measures. They include: - a Data Centre run by the European Commission to bring together all available knowledge on natural resources and inform decision-makers; - an International Panel to be set up in cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to provide independent scientific advice on global aspects of resource use; - the development of national measures and programmes by Member States under the guidance of a High Level Forum with representatives from the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders; - the consideration of environmental impacts of resource use in economic sector action plans that the Commission intends to develop in the context of its strategy for growth and jobs; - lastly, by 2008 the development of indicators to monitor and regularly review progress towards the strategy’s goal. The strategy is focusing on improving knowledge, developing monitoring tools and fostering strategic approaches in specific economic sectors, Member States and internationally. The strategy is one of the seven 'thematic' strategies required under the 6 th Environment Action Programme (2002-2012) and closely linked to the waste thematic strategy. Other thematic strategies to be developed by the Commission concern air pollution and marine environment as well as soils, pesticides and the urban environment.
  • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted conclusions on the sustainable use of natural resources. It invites the Commission and Member States to endorse the following priorities for action: 1) Outline an ecological vision: focus efforts to outline the ecological dimension of the long-term vision anticipated in the renewed Strategy on Sustainable Development. The vision should combine sustainable use of natural resources and sustainable consumption and production with a view to the goal of increasing wellbeing while reducing the consumption of natural resources and environmental impacts related to their use. The vision should act as a catalyst for setting strategies to diminish Europe's dependency on fossil fuels and to increase resource efficiency, including material efficiency, significantly in order to break the linkage between the negative environmental impacts of consumption and the growth of the economy while at the same time creating new business opportunities by encouraging innovation. 2) Balance the use of natural resources: set targets for resource-specific impacts and eco-efficiency in order to complement the strategy by the year 2010. Targets and measures should address uses of natural resources that contribute most to negative environmental and social impacts. The focus should be to improve resource-efficiency and to decrease negative impacts, especially in crucial economic sectors such as housing, transport and food. Member States are called upon to deepen the understanding of the impacts of natural resource use throughout the whole life-cycle and as appropriate to implement national programmes and measures. The Commission is invited to facilitate the exchange of best practice and of information on national programmes for the sustainable use of natural resources at a high level with all Member States. The Council calls on the EU to take a leading initiatory role at global level towards the establishment of an international panel on natural resources under the auspices of the UNEP. The main idea of the panel should be to inform and support policy-makers globally and at EU level in questions of resource use and resource efficiency. It also recognises the importance of biodiversity for supporting ecosystems services vital to the use of natural resources and the negative impacts resource use can have on biodiversity; and underlines the importance of the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources for reaching the global target of significantly reducing the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. 3) Find synergies between the strategy on natural resources and the action plan on sustainable consumption and production: the Council stresses that the Commission will draw up an EU Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) Action Plan by 2007. The key objectives of the action plan should be to identify concrete steps to improve eco-efficiency aiming to bring resource use and consumption patterns within national, regional and global carrying capacities. The Council highlights the fact that, to achieve these objectives, the SCP action plan should: § launch targeted structured dialogues involving authorities, businesses, research institutes and NGOs to improve eco-efficiency, and formulate proactive strategies to promote best practices; § inspire purchasers and suppliers to seek the most cost-effective environmental technologies and solutions and to give preference to products, services and technologies with optimised resource use; § consider options for new market-based instruments that can also ensure that policy goals can be reached in a cost-effective way. Further progress is also needed on the elimination of environmentally harmful subsidies; § set long-term targets for the environmental performance of key products and services based on life-cycle thinking and encourage their uptake by business and consumers; § motivate Member States and the EU to set indicative targets for the funding of research and development in eco-innovations; § use effectively existing proactive policy tools that promote cleaner production and products, including eco-labels, environmental management systems, producer responsibility, and sustainable public procurement policies; § integrate natural resources concerns into all policy areas relevant to SCP, such as in the 2007 mid-term review of the Communication "Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A Policy Framework to Strengthen EU Manufacturing.
  • date: 2007-02-28T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The committee adopted the own-initiative report drawn by Kartika Tamara LIOTARD (GUE-NGL, NL) in response to the Commission communication on a Thematic Strategy for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. The report was highly critical of the communication, saying that that it lacked "a clear vision" on how to meet the overall objective and that the proposed action platform would not be able "to persuade the public or political decision-makers to pursue the crucial goals for which it provides". Noting that the Thematic Strategy fails to pursue the objectives of the European Community's 6th Environmental Action Programme, the committee called on the Commission to make the Strategy more effective, to establish goals and targets at political and sectoral level for resource efficiency as well as to speed up the work on appropriate tools to maintain progress. The Commission was also urged to set binding targets and timetables for natural resources by developing and implementing best practices for every production chain and by achieving a quantitative greenhouse gas reduction of at least 30% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 against 1990 levels. In addition, the committee encouraged the Commission to propose Community policies in order to foster stakeholder interaction and promote application of life-cycle assessments and/or other methods among companies as well as to develop CO2 targets on national and sectoral basis. MEPs said that the EU should "aim to be the world leader in eco-efficient technologies", and stressed that R&D efforts must be geared towards our understanding of how natural systems work so as to structure production and consumption systems along biological lines, thereby improving resource productivity and reducing pollution. Among its other recommendations, the committee urged the Commission to perform within three years an assessment of the possibilities and instruments for decoupling natural resource use from economic growth and to add other indicators for assessing the use of natural resources, based on various aspects of the quality of life, such as public health conditions, social inclusion, social awareness of the decision-making processes and an environmental 'footprint'. The report also called on the EU to ensure that all Community instruments and legislation contribute to the conservation of natural resources both within and outside the EU. For example, the Union should encourage the establishment of resource strategies in non-EU countries, which should also be reflected in its funds and aid policy. The committee also stressed that market instruments and subsidies, particularly of a fiscal nature, can be used to reduce the use of environmentally damaging resources, particularly by gradually reducing any subsidies to unsustainable activities and supporting the introduction of ecotaxes. In addition, MEPs considered that the EU should do everything possible to provide consumers and producers with proper information on the sustainable use of natural resources and that environmental education should form part of elementary education. Lastly, the report called on the Commission to develop, within three years, a methodology to measure the environmental impact of every production chain and to monitor on a three-yearly basis the progress in improving resource efficiency.
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-54&language=EN title: A6-0054/2007
  • date: 2007-04-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070424&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-04-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13355&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-04-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-154 title: T6-0154/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Kartika Tamara LIOTARD (GUE-NGL, NL) in response to the Commission communication on a Thematic Strategy for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. It took reluctant note of the document and regretted the lack of a clear vision on how to meet the overall objective. Parliament felt that it should be seen as a first step in a process eventually leading to a comprehensive strategy for the sustainable use of natural resources. The Commission's action platform for the study of the Sustainable Development Strategy was too cautious and limited in scope and, in its present form, it would not be able to persuade the public or political decision-makers to pursue the crucial goals for which it provides. Parliament called on the Commission to establish goals and targets at political and at sectoral level for resource efficiency, and speed up the work on appropriate tools to maintain progress. Moreover, the Thematic Strategy failed to pursue the objectives of the European Community's 6th EAP. Parliament went on to state that pollution, the increasing scarcity of natural resources and raw materials and the increasing difficulty of gaining access to them would cause price rises on such a scale as to more or less completely destabilise the economic and social systems of the EU, and will give rise to risks of conflict. The Commission must set binding targets and timetables for natural resources in the following way: - develop and implement best practices for every production chain; and - achieve a quantitative greenhouse gas reduction of at least 30% by 2020 and of 80% by 2050 against 1990 levels. The Commission was also encouraged to define best practices for the major product groups, starting with the "top-ten" (defined by the Commission), to be completed within three years. The Data Centre for Natural Resources (proposed in the Thematic Strategy) must be responsible for defining best practices. Community policies must be proposed for the purpose of fostering stakeholder interaction and promote application of life-cycle assessments (LCA) and/or other methods among companies and provide information upon request; and develop CO2 targets on a national and a sectoral basis. The EU should take the lead in the search for innovative solutions and in promoting more efficient use of resources, and it should aim to be the world leader in eco-efficient technologies. Parliament noted that the market for sustainable products would have to grow in order to meet the increasing demand from a rapidly growing 'middle class' for consumer goods and services which respect regional and global carrying capacity. While acknowledging that working towards the sustainable use of natural resources is a long-term process, Parliament felt that a time horizon of 25 years as outlined in the Commission's communication was too long. Parliament did not agree with the Commission that no indicators are known which would enable specific, clear and time-tabled objectives to be included in the Thematic Strategy now. Indicators which are already known include GDP (Gross Domestic Product), DMI (Direct Material Input) and DMC (Domestic Material Consumption ). Other indicators as available and detailed as these would be related to various aspects of the quality of life, such as public health conditions, social inclusion, social awareness of decision-making processes and an environmental "footprint". The challenge would be to improve the quality of life by pursuing more immaterial goals with the support of information and communication technologies, and in general less demanding technologies, and therefore reducing the pressure on natural resources. Parliament then proposed that the Commission perform within three years an assessment regarding the possibilities and the instruments for decoupling natural resource use from economic growth. The revised Thematic Strategy should include these decoupling instruments. This approach should also be implemented in the revision of existing policies. The EU should adopt a clear target for the absolute reduction of resource use, given that the analysis in the Annex to the Thematic Strategy indicates that we need to go beyond a 3% annual resource efficiency improvement, and that halving resource use in the period 2005-2030 requires almost 6% annual resource efficiency improvement. All Community instruments and legislation must contribute overall to the conservation of natural resources and the pursuit of sustainable development in the EU and countries outside the EU. The EU should encourage the establishment of resource strategies in non-EU countries, which should also be reflected in its funds and aid policy. Market instruments and subsidies, particularly of a fiscal nature, could be used to reduce the use of environmentally damaging resources, particularly by means of a re-allocation of subsidies and by reducing in stages, but quickly, any subsidies to unsustainable activities and supporting the introduction of ecotaxes. For example, more subsidies for small-scale hydroelectric power, as well as for wind power and solar energy, would promote the use of new technologies and improve Europe's competitive position in the world, as well as reducing dependence on fossil fuels imported from other parts of the world. Parliament proposed that targets be set for resource use reduction in the following sectors: food, housing and transport, as according to recent studies, these cause the highest negative impacts. Agricultural policy, in particular, should be geared partly to reducing pressure on the environment by means of the sustainable use of natural resources including, but not confined to, land, water and fuels. In agriculture, genuine progress needed to be made in research into ecological production methods, regulation and monitoring relating, inter alia, to the use of fertilisers, pesticides and water, promotion of short chains, internalising external costs and attaching environmental conditions to economic support. The pioneering role of organic and sustainable farming should be acknowledged and supported. Lastly, Parliament considered that the EU should do everything possible to provide consumers and producers with proper information on the sustainable use of natural resources, and that environmental education, particularly concerning sustainable consumption, should form part of elementary education. Producers should supply information to the public on the origin and production methods of their products and services and the production chains involved.
  • date: 2007-04-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/6/33974
New
  • ENVI/6/33974
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.60 Energy policy
  • 3.70 Environmental policy
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
New
3.60
Energy policy
3.70
Environmental policy
6.30
Development cooperation
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0670/COM_COM(2005)0670_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0670/COM_COM(2005)0670_EN.pdf
activities
  • date: 2005-12-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2005/0670/COM_COM(2005)0670_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52005DC0670:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2005)0670 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
  • date: 2006-09-07T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2757 council: Environment date: 2006-10-23T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-02-28T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-54&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0054/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-04-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070424&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-04-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13355&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-154 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0154/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2005-11-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: LIOTARD Kartika Tamara
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/6/33974
reference
2006/2210(INI)
title
Thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject