2006/2600(RSP) | [ParlTrack]

download json

2006/2600(RSP) Resolution on freedom of expression on the Internet

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:

RoP 144

Subjects

3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet

Events

2006/08/28

EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary

Documents

SP(2006)3801

2006/07/06

EP - Results of vote in Parliament

Documents

Results of vote in Parliament

2006/07/06

EP - Debate in Parliament

Documents

Debate in Parliament

2006/07/06

EP - Decision by Parliament

Details

The European Parliament adopted a joint resolution on f reedom of expression on the internet by 65 votes in favour, none against and two abstentions.

It pointed out that , according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and setting-up cyber-police. A large number of cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China. A number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam. The Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market. Furthermore, equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet preventing freedom of expression. Parliament also pointed out that US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet businesses when they operate in repressive countries.

In the face of this, Parliament reaffirmed the fact that freedom of expression is a key value shared by all EU countries and that they have to take concrete steps to defend it. It called on the Council and the EU Member States to agree on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on the internet world-wide. It reiterated its commitment to the principles which were confirmed at the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November 2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms:

- building the information society on the basis of human rights and fundamental freedoms;

- combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to foster development,

- developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced, pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.).

Parliament strongly condemned restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply to the dissemination or to the receipt of information that are imposed by Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom of expression. It also strongly condemned the harassment and imprisonment of journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet. It called on the Council and the Commission to do the following:

- take all necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for the immediate release of all detained Internet users.

- draw up a voluntary code of conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive countries;

- maintain the presence and active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP;

- take into account the need for unrestricted Internet access by their citizens, when considering its assistance programmes to third countries.

Finally, Parliament welcomed the Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the Internet at the initiative of Reporters Without Borders. It stressed that corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other services should have a responsibility to ensure that the rights of users are respected.

Documents

T6-0324/2006

2006/07/06

EP - End of procedure in Parliament

2006/07/04

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0401/2006

2006/07/04

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0402/2006

2006/07/04

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0404/2006

2006/07/04

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0408/2006

2006/07/04

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0411/2006

2006/07/04

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0414/2006

2006/07/04

Joint motion for resolution

Documents

RC-B6-0401/2006

Documents

Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)3801
Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
Decision by Parliament: T6-0324/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0401/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0402/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0404/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0408/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0411/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0414/2006
Joint motion for resolution: RC-B6-0401/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0401/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0402/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0404/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0408/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0411/2006
Motion for a resolution: B6-0414/2006
Joint motion for resolution: RC-B6-0401/2006
Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2006)3801

Activities

Gérard ONESTA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Simon COVENEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Urszula KRUPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Jules MAATEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Tobias PFLÜGER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Kathy SINNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Catherine TRAUTMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)
Tadeusz ZWIEFKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Freedom of expression on the internet (debate)

Votes

RC B6-0401/2006 - Liberté d'expression sur Internet - résolution #

2006/07/06 Outcome: +: 65, 0: 2

		PL	DE	FR	AT	EL	ES	PT	IE	IT	LT	GB	DK	NL	CY	LU	CZ	SK	BE	SE
	Total	18	11	9	3	3	3	3	2	2	2	2	1	1	1	1	2	1	1	1
PPE-DE	30	Poland PPE-DE For (7) Bogusław SONIK, Filip KACZMAREK, Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI, Jan OLBRYCHT, Tadeusz ZWIEFKA, Zbigniew ZALESKI, Zdzisław Kazimierz CHMIELEWSKI 7	Germany PPE-DE For (8) Albert DESS, Alfred GOMOLKA, Bernd POSSELT, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Hans-Peter MAYER, Michael GAHLER, Rainer WIELAND, Renate SOMMER 8	France PPE-DE For (4) Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Jean-Paul GAUZÈS, Jean-Pierre AUDY, Margie SUDRE 4	Austria PPE-DE For (1) Othmar KARAS 1	Greece PPE-DE For (3) Antonis SAMARAS, Georgios PAPASTAMKOS, Manolis MAVROMMATIS 3			Ireland PPE-DE For (1) Simon COVENEY 1		Lithuania PPE-DE For (1) Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ 1	United Kingdom PPE-DE For (2) Giles CHICHESTER, Robert STURDY 2				Luxembourg PPE-DE For (1) Astrid LULLING 1	Czechia PPE-DE For (1) Zuzana ROITHOVÁ 1	Slovakia PPE-DE For (1) Anna ZÁBORSKÁ 1
PSE	16	Poland PSE For (3) Józef PINIOR, Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG, Wiesław Stefan KUC 3	Germany PSE For (1) Heinz KINDERMANN 1	France PSE For (3) Catherine TRAUTMANN, Marie-Arlette CARLOTTI, Marie-Line REYNAUD 3	Austria PSE For (2) Harald ETTL, Karin SCHEELE 2		Spain PSE For (2) Inés AYALA SENDER, Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA 2	Portugal PSE For (3) Elisa FERREIRA, Joel HASSE FERREIRA, Paulo CASACA 3			Lithuania PSE For (1) Aloyzas SAKALAS 1								Belgium PSE For (1) Alain HUTCHINSON 1
ALDE	4	Poland ALDE For (1) Janusz ONYSZKIEWICZ 1											Denmark ALDE For (1) Niels BUSK 1	Netherlands ALDE For (1) Jules MAATEN 1	Cyprus ALDE For (1) Marios MATSAKIS 1
NI	4	Poland NI For (3) Bernard WOJCIECHOWSKI, Leopold Józef RUTOWICZ, Ryszard CZARNECKI 3								Italy NI For (1) Luca ROMAGNOLI 1
Verts/ALE	4			France Verts/ALE For (2) Gérard ONESTA, Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN 2			Spain Verts/ALE For (1) Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA 1													Sweden Verts/ALE For (1) Carl SCHLYTER 1
IND/DEM	3	Poland IND/DEM For (2) Bogusław ROGALSKI, Urszula KRUPA 2							Ireland IND/DEM For (1) Kathy SINNOTT 1
UEN	3	Poland UEN For (2) Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, Marcin LIBICKI 2								Italy UEN For (1) Cristiana MUSCARDINI 1
GUE/NGL	3		Germany GUE/NGL For (1) André BRIE Abstain (1) Tobias PFLÜGER 2														Czechia GUE/NGL Abstain (1) Daniel STROŽ 1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2023-08-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel

docs/7	date 2006-08-28T00:00:00 docs url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=12453&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)3801 type Commission response to text adopted in plenary body EC
events/0/docs/0/url	Old https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4776&l=en New https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12453&l=en

2021-12-18Show (12) Changes | Timetravel

docs/0/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0401_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0401_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0402_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0402_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0404_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0404_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0408_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0408_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0411_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0411_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0414_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0414_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2006-0401_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2006-0401_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060706&type=CRE New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20060706&type=CRE
events/2	date 2006-07-06T00:00:00 type Decision by Parliament body EP docs url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0324_EN.html title: T6-0324/2006 summary The European Parliament adopted a joint resolution on f reedom of expression on the internet by 65 votes in favour, none against and two abstentions. It pointed out that , according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and setting-up cyber-police. A large number of cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China. A number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam. The Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market. Furthermore, equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet preventing freedom of expression. Parliament also pointed out that US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet businesses when they operate in repressive countries. In the face of this, Parliament reaffirmed the fact that freedom of expression is a key value shared by all EU countries and that they have to take concrete steps to defend it. It called on the Council and the EU Member States to agree on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on the internet world-wide. It reiterated its commitment to the principles which were confirmed at the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November 2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms: - building the information society on the basis of human rights and fundamental freedoms; - combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to foster development, - developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced, pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.). Parliament strongly condemned restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply to the dissemination or to the receipt of information that are imposed by Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom of expression. It also strongly condemned the harassment and imprisonment of journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet. It called on the Council and the Commission to do the following: - take all necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for the immediate release of all detained Internet users. - draw up a voluntary code of conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive countries; - maintain the presence and active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP; - take into account the need for unrestricted Internet access by their citizens, when considering its assistance programmes to third countries. Finally, Parliament welcomed the Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the Internet at the initiative of Reporters Without Borders. It stressed that corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other services should have a responsibility to ensure that the rights of users are respected.
events/2	date 2006-07-06T00:00:00 type Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body EP docs url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0324_EN.html title: T6-0324/2006 summary The European Parliament adopted a joint resolution on f reedom of expression on the internet by 65 votes in favour, none against and two abstentions. It pointed out that , according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and setting-up cyber-police. A large number of cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China. A number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam. The Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market. Furthermore, equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet preventing freedom of expression. Parliament also pointed out that US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet businesses when they operate in repressive countries. In the face of this, Parliament reaffirmed the fact that freedom of expression is a key value shared by all EU countries and that they have to take concrete steps to defend it. It called on the Council and the EU Member States to agree on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on the internet world-wide. It reiterated its commitment to the principles which were confirmed at the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November 2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms: - building the information society on the basis of human rights and fundamental freedoms; - combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to foster development, - developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced, pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.). Parliament strongly condemned restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply to the dissemination or to the receipt of information that are imposed by Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom of expression. It also strongly condemned the harassment and imprisonment of journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet. It called on the Council and the Commission to do the following: - take all necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for the immediate release of all detained Internet users. - draw up a voluntary code of conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive countries; - maintain the presence and active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP; - take into account the need for unrestricted Internet access by their citizens, when considering its assistance programmes to third countries. Finally, Parliament welcomed the Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the Internet at the initiative of Reporters Without Borders. It stressed that corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other services should have a responsibility to ensure that the rights of users are respected.
procedure/legal_basis/0	Rules of Procedure EP 144
procedure/legal_basis/0	Rules of Procedure EP 135

2020-01-19Show (10) Changes | Timetravel

docs/0/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-401&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0401_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-402&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0402_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-404&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0404_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-408&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0408_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-411&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0411_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-414&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2006-0414_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P6-RC-2006-401&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2006-0401_EN.html
docs/7	date 2006-08-28T00:00:00 docs url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=12453&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)3801 type Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events/0/docs/0/url	Old https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12453&l=en New https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=4776&l=en
events/2/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-324 New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2006-0324_EN.html

2019-07-06Show (9) Changes | Timetravel

activities	date: 2006-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12453&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060706&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-324 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0324/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
docs	date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-401&language=EN title: B6-0401/2006 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-402&language=EN title: B6-0402/2006 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-404&language=EN title: B6-0404/2006 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-408&language=EN title: B6-0408/2006 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-411&language=EN title: B6-0411/2006 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2006-414&language=EN title: B6-0414/2006 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2006-07-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P6-RC-2006-401&language=EN title: RC-B6-0401/2006 type: Joint motion for resolution date: 2006-08-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=12453&j=0&l=en title: SP(2006)3801 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events	date: 2006-07-06T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12453&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament date: 2006-07-06T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060706&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament date: 2006-07-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-324 title: T6-0324/2006 summary: The European Parliament adopted a joint resolution on f reedom of expression on the internet by 65 votes in favour, none against and two abstentions. It pointed out that , according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and setting-up cyber-police. A large number of cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China. A number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam. The Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market. Furthermore, equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet preventing freedom of expression. Parliament also pointed out that US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet businesses when they operate in repressive countries. In the face of this, Parliament reaffirmed the fact that freedom of expression is a key value shared by all EU countries and that they have to take concrete steps to defend it. It called on the Council and the EU Member States to agree on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on the internet world-wide. It reiterated its commitment to the principles which were confirmed at the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November 2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms: - building the information society on the basis of human rights and fundamental freedoms; - combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to foster development, - developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced, pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.). Parliament strongly condemned restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply to the dissemination or to the receipt of information that are imposed by Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom of expression. It also strongly condemned the harassment and imprisonment of journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet. It called on the Council and the Commission to do the following: - take all necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for the immediate release of all detained Internet users. - draw up a voluntary code of conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive countries; - maintain the presence and active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP; - take into account the need for unrestricted Internet access by their citizens, when considering its assistance programmes to third countries. Finally, Parliament welcomed the Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the Internet at the initiative of Reporters Without Borders. It stressed that corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other services should have a responsibility to ensure that the rights of users are respected. date: 2006-07-06T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
procedure/legal_basis/0	Rules of Procedure EP 135
procedure/legal_basis/0	Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 135
procedure/subject	Old 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet New 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet

2014-11-10Show (5) Changes

activities	date: 2006-07-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=12453&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20060706&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2006-324 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0324/2006 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
links
other
procedure	reference 2006/2600(RSP) title Resolution on freedom of expression on the Internet legal_basis Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 135 stage_reached Procedure completed subtype Urgent debate or resolution type RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects subject 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:

Subjects

Links

Events

Documents

Activities

Votes

RC B6-0401/2006 - Liberté d'expression sur Internet - résolution #

Poland PPE-DE

For (7)

Germany PPE-DE

For (8)

France PPE-DE

For (4)

Austria PPE-DE

For (1)

Greece PPE-DE

For (3)

Ireland PPE-DE

For (1)

Lithuania PPE-DE

For (1)

United Kingdom PPE-DE

For (2)

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

Czechia PPE-DE

For (1)

Slovakia PPE-DE

For (1)

Poland PSE

For (3)

Germany PSE

For (1)

France PSE

For (3)

Austria PSE

For (2)

Spain PSE

For (2)

Portugal PSE

For (3)

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

Belgium PSE

For (1)

Poland ALDE

For (1)

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Netherlands ALDE

For (1)

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

Poland NI

For (3)

Italy NI

For (1)

France Verts/ALE

For (2)

Spain Verts/ALE

For (1)

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

Poland IND/DEM

For (2)

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

Poland UEN

For (2)

Italy UEN

For (1)

Germany GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024