BETA


2007/2002(INI) State of play of EU-Africa relations

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE MARTENS Maria (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion AFET ROCARD Michel (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/01/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/11/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/10/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/10/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Maria MARTENS (EPP-ED, NL) on the state of play of EU-Africa relations and welcomed the "Outline for the Joint EU-Africa Strategy" as endorsed by the 8th EU-Africa Ministerial Troika Meeting of 15 May 2007 in Brussels. It deplored, however, the fact that the Commission’s communication entitled "EU Strategy for Africa: Towards a Euro-African pact to accelerate Africa's development" was adopted without in-depth consultation with the AU institutions and African governments and parliaments, and without any involvement of European and African civil society and local authorities. This strategy dictates the main topics addressed by the proposed new joint strategy, thus running the risk of leaving out other important issues for Africa's sustainable development. Parliament hoped that the new proposed strategy would come forth from in-depth consultation of the AU institutions. Whilst welcoming the Commission's assertion that Parliament had an important role to play in the process, Parliament noted that the timetable for the negotiations was set by the European Commission and the AUC. It expected the Commission and the AUC to take active steps to involve the European Parliament and the PAP in the process of preparing the joint strategy and in its adoption and implementation.

Shared principles and vision : Parliament welcomed the objectives listed in the Troika outline of 15 May 2007: (i) an EU-Africa political partnership, (ii) the continued promotion of peace, security, sustainable development, human rights and regional and continental integration in Africa in order to attain the MDGs, (iii) the common address of global challenges and (iv) a "people-centred partnership". These objectives should faithfully reflect the priorities expressed by Africans. It pointed out that development was nonetheless the main priority objective of the strategy. It called on the Commission to clarify how the new strategy would reflect on the Country Strategy Papers and the National and Regional Indicative Programmes under the Cotonou Agreement. Members went on to point out that humanitarian aid was one of the means available to the international community for helping to protect threatened populations. They emphasised that the EU did not wish to remain unresponsive to violations of international humanitarian law (IHL), and called for an in-depth political debate to be held by the Member States and the EU institutions on the right - if not to say the duty - of intervention in the event of serious violations of IHL and/or human rights. The shared principles and vision should also include respect for the rule of law, as well as participatory democracy, pluralism and fundamental freedoms, all recognised in the Cairo Declaration. Parliament also called on the EU institutions to create a new programmable and predictable financial pan-African envelope from the European Development Fund (EDF), the DCI thematic instruments and the funds of the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (ENPI), in order to finance and support the implementation of this new joint strategy.

The four priority areas for action : development and poverty eradication must be a shared commitment and the overarching objective of EU-Africa cooperation. Parliament underlined the central role of the MDGs, and stated that the joint strategy must also emphasise the role of women, young people and civil society organisations in Africa's development processes. The report called on the Commission to ensure coherence between this new strategy and the other European policies which may have an adverse impact on the promotion of a new strategic partnership between the EU and Africa, in particular the commercial, environmental, migration and agricultural policies.

Peace and security : Parliament favoured a comprehensive approach to conflict and conflict situations, based on the concept of the responsibility to protect and including conflict prevention, resolution, management and reconstruction. It called for greater coherence of EU policies, e.g. by implementing its existing commitments to control the arms trade but also by upgrading the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Export to a legally binding CFSP Common Position and by accelerating the implementation of the EU Strategy to Combat the Illicit Accumulation and Trafficking of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW). In this connection, Parliament stressed how important it is to prevent rather than to resolve conflicts. It called for international aid to be provided for the purpose of establishing regional monitoring centres on a geographical basis, capable of detecting any deterioration in inter-ethnic, inter-religious or inter-linguistic tensions and of alerting the international community to situations in Africa which may turn violent. The existing EU Code of Conduct on Arms Export also needed to be tightened so as to counteract the proliferation of SALW, which perpetuated the murderous conflicts in many developing countries. Parliament considered that the joint strategy would enhance the fight against weapons trafficking.

Governance: Parliament recalled that the concept of governance, and the indicators used to assess it, could not be imposed by external actors, but should be developed in partnership with local actors and based on common values and internationally recognised standards. It reiterated its support for the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly's (JPA) request, that a suitable proportion of EDF appropriations should be used for the political education and training of parliamentarians and leaders, in the interests of a sustainable strengthening of good governance, the rule of law, democratic structures, and the interaction between government and opposition in pluralistic democracies based on free elections. Whilst strengthening governance in African countries was a priority, Parliament noted that governance must be improved on both sides – on the European side in particular, the governance and accountability as regards aid commitments and better donor coordination with a view to taking greater account of the so-called 'aid orphans'. It expressed serious concern that the "governance profiles" developed by the Commission for each ACP country, which will guide programming for development assistance in relation to the EUR 2,700,000,000 additional funds under the 10th EDF, have been prepared without any participatory element. It urged the European Commission and the AUC to use the AU support programme in order to facilitate access for African parliaments, local authorities and non-state actors to the political dialogue taking place in the AU, and to earmark part of the EUR 55,000,000specifically for strengthening the PAP.

Economic growth, trade and regional integration : the report stressed that development assistance was a necessary but insufficient condition for combating poverty and that only equitable and sustainable economic growth could allow a country to start climbing the development ladder, on condition that growth was combined with the right domestic and international social and environmental policies. It deplored the fact that - while poverty reduction and the attainment of the MDGs by 2015 rightly remain the first priority - the Troika Outline lacked concrete proposals to promote growth through the promotion of SMEs and foreign direct investment, strengthened property rights, and the reduction of administrative burdens. The EU must ensure that lending organisations, such as the European Investment Bank and the Centre for the Development of Enterprise, assist SMEs in Africa. More attention should be paid to the informal sector, and that the practice of microfinance should be extended.

With regard to Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) , Parliament felt that these must be negotiated as development agreements as much as trade agreements, which meant that they must be based on the principles of asymmetry in favour of the ACP regions, support for ACP regional integration, the establishment of a reliable framework for the promotion of trade and investment in the ACP regions, and the establishment of regional markets prior to any opening up of markets to the EU. It therefore called on the Commission, whenever necessary, to refrain from opening up markets until specific levels of development had been attained and to find solutions while continuing negotiations. The EPAs could become an important tool for African trade and regional integration, provided that their substance fully accorded with development policy objectives, and only on condition that they were "development-friendly", allowing for exemptions and long transition periods where needed in order for domestic producers and industries to adapt to new market situations.

Parliament insisted that regional economic communities (RECs) should be the pillars of the African integration process and the establishment of a pan-African market, and should not only be dealing directly with Europe. EPAs should not undermine Africa's own regional integration agenda, but should also be instruments for South-South integration and trade.

Investing in people : Parliament insisted that the joint strategy should contribute to gender mainstreaming and to the implementation of concrete actions aimed at the empowerment of women. It stressed that health was one of the most important drivers of economic development and that child mortality rates in particular are a powerful indicator of poverty. The current international commitments to education and health for all needed to be expressly integrated in the joint strategy. 63% of all people in the world infected with HIV live in Africa, and in a number of African countries average life expectancy is falling dramatically as a result of the AIDS pandemic. Universal access to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria services in Africa should be included in the joint strategy. Parliament again stressed that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS, and pregnancy-related complications resulting in high maternal and neonatal mortality.

It moved on to emphasise that EU policies, including subsidy policy, must not harm Africa's agricultural sector or jeopardise food security. The EU was urged to offer financial support to the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Programme', adopted by the AU and NEPAD. Parliament also underlined in relation to the worrying and worsening phenomenon of desertification, the need to support sustainable agricultural methods. The issue of desertification and access to water for all should be of the utmost importance in the joint strategy. Since Africa is the continent predicted to suffer the effects of climate change most severely, Parliament urged the EU, the AU and their Member States, as well as investors and business actors, to acknowledge their responsibility for climate change, and called on them to develop an environment friendly development strategy in order to reverse the situation, including a financial framework for environmental adaptation. The EU must make significant funding available for adaptation measures in African countries. Risk reduction and "climate proofing" measures must be integrated into the overarching development agenda. The joint strategy should also address the root causes of migration and pay particular attention to the rights and the integration of migrants and to the issue of brain drain, particularly in the health sector, by proposing practical solutions to successful circular migration. Parliament went on to acknowledges the usefulness and the relevance of budget support, but called for caution in relation to the disbursement of aid in the form of budget support. Budget support must be treated separately for each country, depending on its particular situation.

Implementation and monitoring : Parliament called on the Commission and the general secretariat of the Council to send all further progress reports on the implementation of the EU strategy for Africa to the European Parliament. It also requested information on the disbursement and implementation of the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF allocated to the "governance initiatives' developed by the Commission for each ACP country, as well as on how the 9th EDF has been used and reprogrammed. The Commission is asked to propose a joint mechanism for the implement and evaluation of the new joint strategy, both on a technical and political basis, including all the EC financial instruments for development at all stages. The report calls on the Commission to ensure that any monitoring framework includes the monitoring of existing commitments by the AU and EU, such as the MDGs, the Cotonou Agreement, the Abuja Call for Action, and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The joint strategy should explicitly include a communications strategy, in order to raise public awareness on what governments are doing and to provide the feedback loop in order to ensure that governments are in touch with the needs of their constituents on these policies.

The Commission is asked to indicate how it will finance the new strategy and its programme of action, and to inform the European Parliament and the PAP at all stages of the process (programming, identification, appraisal, financing, implementation and evaluation).

Lastly, Parliament called for the first action plan to include a specific financial envelope for pan-African institutions, activities to be implemented at pan African level, and the new partnerships (Lisbon initiatives). National, regional and continent-wide parliaments must be expressly considered as beneficiaries of aid.

Documents
2007/10/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/10/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/10/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/10/10
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/10/03
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Development adopted, by unanimity, the initiative report by Maria MARTENS (EPP-ED, NL) on the state of play of EU-Africa relations. The report deplores the fact that the 2005 EU Strategy for Africa was adopted without in-depth consultation with the AU institutions and African governments and parliaments, and without any involvement of European and African civil society and local authorities.

The report deals with the principles of the joint strategy and welcomes the Troika outline of 15 May 2007 ( joint strategy ) as a first joint effort towards a joint strategy. The outline lists four main objectives of the future partnership: i) the strengthening of an EU-Africa political partnership; ii) the continued promotion of peace, security, sustainable development, human rights and regional and continental integration in Africa, and to reach all the Millennium Development Goals by 2015; iii) to address global challenges such as human rights, trade, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, climate change, energy security and sustainability, ICT-issues, science and technology, terrorism and WMDs; iv) a "people-centred partnership", empowering non-state actors and involving all stakeholders.

The committee welcomes the Commission’s assertion that Parliament clearly has an important role to play in the process and its promise to keep Parliament regularly informed of the progress made in the preparation of the joint strategy. The committee regrets that the time-limits established by the EU Commission and Council and the AUC and AU Executive Council for the establishment and adoption of the joint strategy have led to serious limitations in the process. It notes the challenge of ensuring full participation by parliaments and emphasises that non-state actors and local authorities must as a matter of urgency be fully involved and be considered in all phases of adoption, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the joint strategy.

Increased ambitions for a closer partnership need to be accompanied by sufficient funding. It is for this reason that the committee calls on the EU to create a new programmable and predictable financial pan-African envelope from the European Development Fund (EDF), the DCI thematic instruments and the funds of the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (ENPI), in order to finance and support the implementation of this new joint strategy.

Other salient issues are as follows:

Shared principles and vision : MEPs approve the shared vision which is driven by a partnership based on mutual respect, common interest and shared purpose that commits both regions to deepening regional integration as a means of achieving economic and social development. They also share a vision of advancing democracy, good governance and human rights as universal values for promoting development. They call for an in-depth political debate to be held by the Member States and the EU institutions on the right - if not to say the duty - of intervention in the event of serious violations of IHL and/or human rights. They stress that the shared principles and vision should also include respect for the rule of law, as well as participatory democracy, pluralism and fundamental freedoms. They regret that the Commission and Council’s contribution to the strategy does not endorse one of the main requests of the African side: to treat Africa as one.

Structure and priority areas for action : the report insists that fair and sustainable development and poverty eradication must be a shared commitment and the overarching objective of EU-Africa cooperation and the basis for any policy mix, and underlines the central role of the MDGs, which provide a globally agreed framework for this objective. The joint strategy must also emphasise the role of women, youth, and

civil society organisations in Africa’s development processes. The Commission is asked to ensure coherence between this new strategy and the other European policies.

MEPs also highlight other essential points of this strategy:

1) Peace and security : MEPs favour a comprehensive approach to conflict and conflict situations, based on the concept of the responsibility to protect and including conflict prevention, resolution, management and reconstruction. For the committee, peace is vital as a first step towards political, economic and social development, and that sustainable and equitable economic development is an essential precondition for a lasting peace. This is why, the report calls for the implementation of existing commitments to control the arms trade. It calls for international aid for the purpose of establishing regional monitoring centres on a geographical basis, capable of detecting any deterioration of inter-ethnic, inter-religious or inter-linguistic tensions and of alerting the international community to situations in Africa which may turn violent. It calls for the enhancement of the election observation activities conducted by both the EU and the AU, as well as by other African regional bodies, and stresses the need for further cooperation among these election observation missions. It calls for the inclusion in the joint strategy of provisions to address impunity; in this regard, calls for Africa’s legal and judicial systems and their democratic monitoring mechanisms to be strengthened in accordance with human rights, to enable them to try perpetrators of serious crimes against humanity in Africa itself. The work towards a UN definition for conflict resources, so as to better fight economies of war is welcomed. The report calls for conflict sensitivity to be mainstreamed in all objectives of the strategy: not only issues of peace and security, but also in trade, natural resources management, climate change and other key development issues.

2) Governance, including human rights and the rule of law, and mutual accountability : the report calls for increased support for capacity-building actions targeted at parliamentarians and civil society organisations, namely with a view to ensuring budget control and to fight corruption. It reiterates its support for the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly’s (JPA) request, expressed at its 9th session in April 2005, that a suitable proportion of EDF appropriations should be used for the political education and training of parliamentarians and political, economic and social leaders, in the interests of a sustainable strengthening of good governance, the rule of law, democratic structures, and the interaction between government and opposition in pluralistic democracies based on free elections. Strengthening governance in African countries is a priority. However, governance must be improved on both sides – on the European side in particular the governance and accountability on aid commitments and better donor coordination with a view to taking greater account of the so-called 'aid orphans'. The committee expresses serious concern that the ‘governance profiles’ developed by the Commission for each ACP country, which will guide programming for development assistance in relation to the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF, have been prepared without any participatory element.

The report insists that, as part of the above-mentioned relations, both the EU and the African partners should recognise their obligations to respect, protect and fulfil human rights in their international development and investment policies and practices. MEPs request that part of the EUR 55 million specifically for strengthening the PAP go towards this aim.

Lastly, the committee requests the inclusion in the joint strategy of action points in the fields of promoting the consolidation of peace and international justice and combating international crime in accordance with international law.

3) Economic growth, trade and regional integration : the report stresses that development assistance is a necessary but an insufficient condition for combating poverty. However, only equitable and sustainable long-term social and environmental development and economic growth based on decent and productive work in conditions of freedom, equity, security and human dignity can allow a country to start climbing the development ladder. The committee believes that a joint EU-Africa strategy should be based on a sustainable development policy, which takes into account the real need of the African population aiming at guaranteeing a decent income for small farmers, increasing local production, guaranteeing food security and rural livelihood, building domestic and regional markets to combat poverty in Africa.

The report deplores that -while poverty reduction and the achievement of the MDG's by 2015 rightly remain the first priority- the outline of the Troika lacks concrete proposals to promote growth through the promotion of small and medium-sized enterprises and foreign direct investment, strengthened property rights, and the reduction of administrative burdens.

The liberalisation of trade is one of the most effective incentives to economic growth and to political and social progress; therefore, the committee considers it to be indispensable in reducing poverty and an important catalyst to sustainable worldwide development. It points out that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) can become an important tool for African trade and regional integration, provided that their substance fully accords with development policy objectives, but only on condition that they are "development-friendly", allowing for exemptions and long transition periods where needed in order for domestic producers and industries to adapt to new market situations.

Further initiatives are encouraged to increase capacity building in the African agriculture sector, for example by supporting seed banks and research into crop diversification; and calls for locally value added exports to conform to 'Everything But Arms'.

The report stresses that the achievement of long-term economic growth and development necessitates a comprehensive strategy for a reversal of the ongoing depletion of Africa's natural resources. It particularly stresses the urgent need to halt ongoing deforestation and remove incentives that encourage forest destruction; in this context, calls on the EU to introduce tropical forest and land use carbon credits in the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) and to incentivize the regeneration of degraded ecosystems.

4) Investing in people : once again, MEPs note that Africa’s pri ority in any partnership is focused on the socio-economic development of its people. They stress that the current international commitments to education and health for all need to be expressly integrated in the joint strategy. They note that 63% of all people in the world infected with HIV live in Africa, and that in a number of African countries average life expectancy is falling dramatically as a result of the AIDS pandemic. It is therefore necessary that universal access to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria services, in particular universal access to prevention, treatment, care and support, in Africa should be included in the joint strategy as these diseases have a massive impact on Africa's economic and social development. In this context, the report stresses that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS, and pregnancy related complications resulting in high maternal and neonatal mortality. The counterfeiting of medicinal products in Africa (which mainly concerns fatal conditions such as malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/Aids) is a growing scourge, threatening the lives of millions of people. The report encourages the EU and the countries concerned to take action (in particular legal and penal measures) to combat that scourge. Special attention should be given to vulnerable populations, such as internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees.

The committee insists that the issue of desertification and the access to water for all should be of the utmost importance in the joint strategy. It also points out that Africa is the continent predicted to suffer the effects of climate change most severely, therefore urges the EU, the AU and their Member States, as well as investors and business actors, to recognise their responsibility for climate change, and calls on them to develop an environment friendly development strategy in order to reverse the situation, including a financial framework for environmental adaptation.

The report considers that, since in a number of African countries debt is still a heavy burden counteracting any development effort, debt relief should be considered on a case-by-case base and should be conditional on strengthened governance and economic policies, on debt management and in particular on ensuring that debts are not systematically renewed by other lenders.

The report acknowledges the usefulness and the relevance of budget support, which in particular enables basic social services to be improved whilst, at the same time, helping to strengthen the structure of African countries. It calls, however, for caution on the disbursement of aid in the form of budget support. Budget support should be treated separately for each country, depending on its particular situation and that it is not appropriate for fragile States or countries in conflict. It also calls for the establishment of indicators for human and social development, for gender budgeting and for education and health. The Commission is encouraged to further elaborate its proposed “MDG contract” with the intended beneficiaries of budget support. It insists that budget support must be accompanied by the strengthening of the capacity of parliaments, national courts of auditors, local authorities and civil society. Lastly, it proposes that budget support should not replace support to certain key development sectors such as education and health or sectors that risk to be marginalised by recipient governments.

Implementation and monitoring : to ensure an effective implementation of the joint strategy, the committee requests the Commission and the general secretariat of the Council to send all further progress reports on the implementation of the EU strategy for Africa to it. It also requests information on the disbursement and implementation of the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF allocated to the ‘governance initiatives' developed by the Commission for each ACP country as well as how the 9th EDF has been used and reprogrammed.

The Commission is asked to propose a joint mechanism for the implement and evaluation of the new joint strategy, both on a technical and political basis, including all the EC financial instruments for development at all stages. The report calls on the Commission to ensure that any monitoring framework includes the monitoring of existing commitments by the AU and EU, such as the MDGs, the above - mentioned Cotonou Agreement, the above - mentioned Abuja Call for Action, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The Commission is called upon to indicate how it will finance the new strategy and its programme of action; notes that the 10th EDF, the geographical programme for South Africa and the thematic programmes of DCI, and ENPI are the only major funds available to implement the joint strategy. Coherence in the implementation of these cooperation instruments must be ensured. The report calls for the:

first action plan to include a specific financial envelope for pan-African institutions; close monitoring, together with the Pan-African Parliament (PAP), the implementation of the joint strategy and the action programmes. It calls therefore for the establishment of a joint European Parliament - PAP parliamentary delegation as a forum; organisation, together with the PAP, of a Joint Parliamentary event preceding the second EU-Africa Summit planned for December 2007 in Lisbon.

2007/09/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/09/13
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/08/29
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/05/14
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2007/05/14
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/02/27
   EP - ROCARD Michel (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2007/01/30
   EP - MARTENS Maria (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2007/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Martens A6-0375/2007 - par. 61 #

2007/10/25 Outcome: +: 298, -: 179, 0: 7
PL DE CZ IT HU GB RO IE SK LV EL BG BE LT SI LU FI SE ES CY MT AT EE DK NL ?? PT FR
Total
39
70
19
32
17
37
21
9
11
7
11
10
18
6
4
4
9
10
38
2
3
9
4
11
20
1
13
49
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
191

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3
3

Sweden PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Hungary ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

4
icon: UEN UEN
25

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Czechia IND/DEM

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

3

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
5

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ITS ITS
6

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

Abstain (1)

1

France ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: PSE PSE
125

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Greece PSE

2

Bulgaria PSE

3

Lithuania PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Sweden PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Austria PSE

3

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

PSE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Martens A6-0375/2007 - par. 77 #

2007/10/25 Outcome: +: 278, -: 204, 0: 11
FR DK PT IT NL BE SE GB LT ES FI LV BG EE RO AT ?? CY LU HU MT SI SK EL IE CZ DE PL
Total
49
10
14
34
20
19
10
35
7
39
9
7
10
4
23
9
1
2
6
16
3
4
11
11
9
19
71
41
icon: PSE PSE
129

Sweden PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Malta PSE

1

Slovakia PSE

2
2

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
6

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: ITS ITS
9

France ITS

Against (1)

1

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

2
icon: UEN UEN
27

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
191

Sweden PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Rapport Martens A6-0375/2007 - cons. 23 #

2007/10/25 Outcome: +: 275, -: 212, 0: 6
FR DK PT LT NL ES FI IT BE SE LV GB BG EE AT ?? RO CY LU SK MT SI HU EL CZ IE DE PL
Total
49
10
14
7
20
39
9
34
20
10
6
35
10
4
9
1
23
2
6
11
3
4
17
11
19
9
70
41
icon: PSE PSE
129

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Sweden PSE

2

Estonia PSE

2

PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

1
2

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Denmark ALDE

2

Netherlands ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
28

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
6

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia NI

1
2
icon: ITS ITS
10

France ITS

Against (1)

1

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

3
icon: UEN UEN
27

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
192

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Sweden PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Ireland PPE-DE

4

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-386526_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14112&j=0&l=en
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14112&j=0&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.878
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE393.878
docs/1/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.526&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE394.069
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE394.069
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0375_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0375_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14112&j=1&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2007-10-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0375_EN.html title: A6-0375/2007
events/3
date
2007-10-10T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0375_EN.html title: A6-0375/2007
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE
events/6
date
2007-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0483_EN.html title: T6-0483/2007
summary
events/6
date
2007-10-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0483_EN.html title: T6-0483/2007
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: MARTENS Maria date: 2007-01-30T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2007-01-30T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTENS Maria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ROCARD Michel date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2007-02-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ROCARD Michel group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-375&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0375_EN.html
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-375&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0375_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-483
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0483_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: ROCARD Michel body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-01-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARTENS Maria
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2799 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2799*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2799 council: General Affairs date: 2007-05-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-10-03T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: ROCARD Michel body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-01-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARTENS Maria type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-10-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-375&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0375/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14112&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-483 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0483/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2007-01-30T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTENS Maria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2007-02-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: PSE name: ROCARD Michel
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2007-02-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ROCARD Michel group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2007-01-30T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: MARTENS Maria
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2799 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2799*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2007 date: 2007-05-14T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-08-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.878 title: PE393.878 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2007-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.526&secondRef=02 title: PE386.526 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-09-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE394.069 title: PE394.069 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-10-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-375&language=EN title: A6-0375/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14112&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)6028 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-01-31T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14112&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)6302/5 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-01-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-05-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2799*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2007 title: 2799
  • date: 2007-10-03T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Development adopted, by unanimity, the initiative report by Maria MARTENS (EPP-ED, NL) on the state of play of EU-Africa relations. The report deplores the fact that the 2005 EU Strategy for Africa was adopted without in-depth consultation with the AU institutions and African governments and parliaments, and without any involvement of European and African civil society and local authorities. The report deals with the principles of the joint strategy and welcomes the Troika outline of 15 May 2007 ( joint strategy ) as a first joint effort towards a joint strategy. The outline lists four main objectives of the future partnership: i) the strengthening of an EU-Africa political partnership; ii) the continued promotion of peace, security, sustainable development, human rights and regional and continental integration in Africa, and to reach all the Millennium Development Goals by 2015; iii) to address global challenges such as human rights, trade, HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, climate change, energy security and sustainability, ICT-issues, science and technology, terrorism and WMDs; iv) a "people-centred partnership", empowering non-state actors and involving all stakeholders. The committee welcomes the Commission’s assertion that Parliament clearly has an important role to play in the process and its promise to keep Parliament regularly informed of the progress made in the preparation of the joint strategy. The committee regrets that the time-limits established by the EU Commission and Council and the AUC and AU Executive Council for the establishment and adoption of the joint strategy have led to serious limitations in the process. It notes the challenge of ensuring full participation by parliaments and emphasises that non-state actors and local authorities must as a matter of urgency be fully involved and be considered in all phases of adoption, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of the joint strategy. Increased ambitions for a closer partnership need to be accompanied by sufficient funding. It is for this reason that the committee calls on the EU to create a new programmable and predictable financial pan-African envelope from the European Development Fund (EDF), the DCI thematic instruments and the funds of the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (ENPI), in order to finance and support the implementation of this new joint strategy. Other salient issues are as follows: Shared principles and vision : MEPs approve the shared vision which is driven by a partnership based on mutual respect, common interest and shared purpose that commits both regions to deepening regional integration as a means of achieving economic and social development. They also share a vision of advancing democracy, good governance and human rights as universal values for promoting development. They call for an in-depth political debate to be held by the Member States and the EU institutions on the right - if not to say the duty - of intervention in the event of serious violations of IHL and/or human rights. They stress that the shared principles and vision should also include respect for the rule of law, as well as participatory democracy, pluralism and fundamental freedoms. They regret that the Commission and Council’s contribution to the strategy does not endorse one of the main requests of the African side: to treat Africa as one. Structure and priority areas for action : the report insists that fair and sustainable development and poverty eradication must be a shared commitment and the overarching objective of EU-Africa cooperation and the basis for any policy mix, and underlines the central role of the MDGs, which provide a globally agreed framework for this objective. The joint strategy must also emphasise the role of women, youth, and civil society organisations in Africa’s development processes. The Commission is asked to ensure coherence between this new strategy and the other European policies. MEPs also highlight other essential points of this strategy: 1) Peace and security : MEPs favour a comprehensive approach to conflict and conflict situations, based on the concept of the responsibility to protect and including conflict prevention, resolution, management and reconstruction. For the committee, peace is vital as a first step towards political, economic and social development, and that sustainable and equitable economic development is an essential precondition for a lasting peace. This is why, the report calls for the implementation of existing commitments to control the arms trade. It calls for international aid for the purpose of establishing regional monitoring centres on a geographical basis, capable of detecting any deterioration of inter-ethnic, inter-religious or inter-linguistic tensions and of alerting the international community to situations in Africa which may turn violent. It calls for the enhancement of the election observation activities conducted by both the EU and the AU, as well as by other African regional bodies, and stresses the need for further cooperation among these election observation missions. It calls for the inclusion in the joint strategy of provisions to address impunity; in this regard, calls for Africa’s legal and judicial systems and their democratic monitoring mechanisms to be strengthened in accordance with human rights, to enable them to try perpetrators of serious crimes against humanity in Africa itself. The work towards a UN definition for conflict resources, so as to better fight economies of war is welcomed. The report calls for conflict sensitivity to be mainstreamed in all objectives of the strategy: not only issues of peace and security, but also in trade, natural resources management, climate change and other key development issues. 2) Governance, including human rights and the rule of law, and mutual accountability : the report calls for increased support for capacity-building actions targeted at parliamentarians and civil society organisations, namely with a view to ensuring budget control and to fight corruption. It reiterates its support for the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly’s (JPA) request, expressed at its 9th session in April 2005, that a suitable proportion of EDF appropriations should be used for the political education and training of parliamentarians and political, economic and social leaders, in the interests of a sustainable strengthening of good governance, the rule of law, democratic structures, and the interaction between government and opposition in pluralistic democracies based on free elections. Strengthening governance in African countries is a priority. However, governance must be improved on both sides – on the European side in particular the governance and accountability on aid commitments and better donor coordination with a view to taking greater account of the so-called 'aid orphans'. The committee expresses serious concern that the ‘governance profiles’ developed by the Commission for each ACP country, which will guide programming for development assistance in relation to the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF, have been prepared without any participatory element. The report insists that, as part of the above-mentioned relations, both the EU and the African partners should recognise their obligations to respect, protect and fulfil human rights in their international development and investment policies and practices. MEPs request that part of the EUR 55 million specifically for strengthening the PAP go towards this aim. Lastly, the committee requests the inclusion in the joint strategy of action points in the fields of promoting the consolidation of peace and international justice and combating international crime in accordance with international law. 3) Economic growth, trade and regional integration : the report stresses that development assistance is a necessary but an insufficient condition for combating poverty. However, only equitable and sustainable long-term social and environmental development and economic growth based on decent and productive work in conditions of freedom, equity, security and human dignity can allow a country to start climbing the development ladder. The committee believes that a joint EU-Africa strategy should be based on a sustainable development policy, which takes into account the real need of the African population aiming at guaranteeing a decent income for small farmers, increasing local production, guaranteeing food security and rural livelihood, building domestic and regional markets to combat poverty in Africa. The report deplores that -while poverty reduction and the achievement of the MDG's by 2015 rightly remain the first priority- the outline of the Troika lacks concrete proposals to promote growth through the promotion of small and medium-sized enterprises and foreign direct investment, strengthened property rights, and the reduction of administrative burdens. The liberalisation of trade is one of the most effective incentives to economic growth and to political and social progress; therefore, the committee considers it to be indispensable in reducing poverty and an important catalyst to sustainable worldwide development. It points out that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) can become an important tool for African trade and regional integration, provided that their substance fully accords with development policy objectives, but only on condition that they are "development-friendly", allowing for exemptions and long transition periods where needed in order for domestic producers and industries to adapt to new market situations. Further initiatives are encouraged to increase capacity building in the African agriculture sector, for example by supporting seed banks and research into crop diversification; and calls for locally value added exports to conform to 'Everything But Arms'. The report stresses that the achievement of long-term economic growth and development necessitates a comprehensive strategy for a reversal of the ongoing depletion of Africa's natural resources. It particularly stresses the urgent need to halt ongoing deforestation and remove incentives that encourage forest destruction; in this context, calls on the EU to introduce tropical forest and land use carbon credits in the EU Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) and to incentivize the regeneration of degraded ecosystems. 4) Investing in people : once again, MEPs note that Africa’s pri ority in any partnership is focused on the socio-economic development of its people. They stress that the current international commitments to education and health for all need to be expressly integrated in the joint strategy. They note that 63% of all people in the world infected with HIV live in Africa, and that in a number of African countries average life expectancy is falling dramatically as a result of the AIDS pandemic. It is therefore necessary that universal access to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria services, in particular universal access to prevention, treatment, care and support, in Africa should be included in the joint strategy as these diseases have a massive impact on Africa's economic and social development. In this context, the report stresses that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS, and pregnancy related complications resulting in high maternal and neonatal mortality. The counterfeiting of medicinal products in Africa (which mainly concerns fatal conditions such as malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/Aids) is a growing scourge, threatening the lives of millions of people. The report encourages the EU and the countries concerned to take action (in particular legal and penal measures) to combat that scourge. Special attention should be given to vulnerable populations, such as internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees. The committee insists that the issue of desertification and the access to water for all should be of the utmost importance in the joint strategy. It also points out that Africa is the continent predicted to suffer the effects of climate change most severely, therefore urges the EU, the AU and their Member States, as well as investors and business actors, to recognise their responsibility for climate change, and calls on them to develop an environment friendly development strategy in order to reverse the situation, including a financial framework for environmental adaptation. The report considers that, since in a number of African countries debt is still a heavy burden counteracting any development effort, debt relief should be considered on a case-by-case base and should be conditional on strengthened governance and economic policies, on debt management and in particular on ensuring that debts are not systematically renewed by other lenders. The report acknowledges the usefulness and the relevance of budget support, which in particular enables basic social services to be improved whilst, at the same time, helping to strengthen the structure of African countries. It calls, however, for caution on the disbursement of aid in the form of budget support. Budget support should be treated separately for each country, depending on its particular situation and that it is not appropriate for fragile States or countries in conflict. It also calls for the establishment of indicators for human and social development, for gender budgeting and for education and health. The Commission is encouraged to further elaborate its proposed “MDG contract” with the intended beneficiaries of budget support. It insists that budget support must be accompanied by the strengthening of the capacity of parliaments, national courts of auditors, local authorities and civil society. Lastly, it proposes that budget support should not replace support to certain key development sectors such as education and health or sectors that risk to be marginalised by recipient governments. Implementation and monitoring : to ensure an effective implementation of the joint strategy, the committee requests the Commission and the general secretariat of the Council to send all further progress reports on the implementation of the EU strategy for Africa to it. It also requests information on the disbursement and implementation of the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF allocated to the ‘governance initiatives' developed by the Commission for each ACP country as well as how the 9th EDF has been used and reprogrammed. The Commission is asked to propose a joint mechanism for the implement and evaluation of the new joint strategy, both on a technical and political basis, including all the EC financial instruments for development at all stages. The report calls on the Commission to ensure that any monitoring framework includes the monitoring of existing commitments by the AU and EU, such as the MDGs, the above - mentioned Cotonou Agreement, the above - mentioned Abuja Call for Action, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The Commission is called upon to indicate how it will finance the new strategy and its programme of action; notes that the 10th EDF, the geographical programme for South Africa and the thematic programmes of DCI, and ENPI are the only major funds available to implement the joint strategy. Coherence in the implementation of these cooperation instruments must be ensured. The report calls for the: first action plan to include a specific financial envelope for pan-African institutions; close monitoring, together with the Pan-African Parliament (PAP), the implementation of the joint strategy and the action programmes. It calls therefore for the establishment of a joint European Parliament - PAP parliamentary delegation as a forum; organisation, together with the PAP, of a Joint Parliamentary event preceding the second EU-Africa Summit planned for December 2007 in Lisbon.
  • date: 2007-10-10T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-375&language=EN title: A6-0375/2007
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14112&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-483 title: T6-0483/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Maria MARTENS (EPP-ED, NL) on the state of play of EU-Africa relations and welcomed the "Outline for the Joint EU-Africa Strategy" as endorsed by the 8th EU-Africa Ministerial Troika Meeting of 15 May 2007 in Brussels. It deplored, however, the fact that the Commission’s communication entitled "EU Strategy for Africa: Towards a Euro-African pact to accelerate Africa's development" was adopted without in-depth consultation with the AU institutions and African governments and parliaments, and without any involvement of European and African civil society and local authorities. This strategy dictates the main topics addressed by the proposed new joint strategy, thus running the risk of leaving out other important issues for Africa's sustainable development. Parliament hoped that the new proposed strategy would come forth from in-depth consultation of the AU institutions. Whilst welcoming the Commission's assertion that Parliament had an important role to play in the process, Parliament noted that the timetable for the negotiations was set by the European Commission and the AUC. It expected the Commission and the AUC to take active steps to involve the European Parliament and the PAP in the process of preparing the joint strategy and in its adoption and implementation. Shared principles and vision : Parliament welcomed the objectives listed in the Troika outline of 15 May 2007: (i) an EU-Africa political partnership, (ii) the continued promotion of peace, security, sustainable development, human rights and regional and continental integration in Africa in order to attain the MDGs, (iii) the common address of global challenges and (iv) a "people-centred partnership". These objectives should faithfully reflect the priorities expressed by Africans. It pointed out that development was nonetheless the main priority objective of the strategy. It called on the Commission to clarify how the new strategy would reflect on the Country Strategy Papers and the National and Regional Indicative Programmes under the Cotonou Agreement. Members went on to point out that humanitarian aid was one of the means available to the international community for helping to protect threatened populations. They emphasised that the EU did not wish to remain unresponsive to violations of international humanitarian law (IHL), and called for an in-depth political debate to be held by the Member States and the EU institutions on the right - if not to say the duty - of intervention in the event of serious violations of IHL and/or human rights. The shared principles and vision should also include respect for the rule of law, as well as participatory democracy, pluralism and fundamental freedoms, all recognised in the Cairo Declaration. Parliament also called on the EU institutions to create a new programmable and predictable financial pan-African envelope from the European Development Fund (EDF), the DCI thematic instruments and the funds of the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (ENPI), in order to finance and support the implementation of this new joint strategy. The four priority areas for action : development and poverty eradication must be a shared commitment and the overarching objective of EU-Africa cooperation. Parliament underlined the central role of the MDGs, and stated that the joint strategy must also emphasise the role of women, young people and civil society organisations in Africa's development processes. The report called on the Commission to ensure coherence between this new strategy and the other European policies which may have an adverse impact on the promotion of a new strategic partnership between the EU and Africa, in particular the commercial, environmental, migration and agricultural policies. Peace and security : Parliament favoured a comprehensive approach to conflict and conflict situations, based on the concept of the responsibility to protect and including conflict prevention, resolution, management and reconstruction. It called for greater coherence of EU policies, e.g. by implementing its existing commitments to control the arms trade but also by upgrading the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Export to a legally binding CFSP Common Position and by accelerating the implementation of the EU Strategy to Combat the Illicit Accumulation and Trafficking of Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW). In this connection, Parliament stressed how important it is to prevent rather than to resolve conflicts. It called for international aid to be provided for the purpose of establishing regional monitoring centres on a geographical basis, capable of detecting any deterioration in inter-ethnic, inter-religious or inter-linguistic tensions and of alerting the international community to situations in Africa which may turn violent. The existing EU Code of Conduct on Arms Export also needed to be tightened so as to counteract the proliferation of SALW, which perpetuated the murderous conflicts in many developing countries. Parliament considered that the joint strategy would enhance the fight against weapons trafficking. Governance: Parliament recalled that the concept of governance, and the indicators used to assess it, could not be imposed by external actors, but should be developed in partnership with local actors and based on common values and internationally recognised standards. It reiterated its support for the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly's (JPA) request, that a suitable proportion of EDF appropriations should be used for the political education and training of parliamentarians and leaders, in the interests of a sustainable strengthening of good governance, the rule of law, democratic structures, and the interaction between government and opposition in pluralistic democracies based on free elections. Whilst strengthening governance in African countries was a priority, Parliament noted that governance must be improved on both sides – on the European side in particular, the governance and accountability as regards aid commitments and better donor coordination with a view to taking greater account of the so-called 'aid orphans'. It expressed serious concern that the "governance profiles" developed by the Commission for each ACP country, which will guide programming for development assistance in relation to the EUR 2,700,000,000 additional funds under the 10th EDF, have been prepared without any participatory element. It urged the European Commission and the AUC to use the AU support programme in order to facilitate access for African parliaments, local authorities and non-state actors to the political dialogue taking place in the AU, and to earmark part of the EUR 55,000,000specifically for strengthening the PAP. Economic growth, trade and regional integration : the report stressed that development assistance was a necessary but insufficient condition for combating poverty and that only equitable and sustainable economic growth could allow a country to start climbing the development ladder, on condition that growth was combined with the right domestic and international social and environmental policies. It deplored the fact that - while poverty reduction and the attainment of the MDGs by 2015 rightly remain the first priority - the Troika Outline lacked concrete proposals to promote growth through the promotion of SMEs and foreign direct investment, strengthened property rights, and the reduction of administrative burdens. The EU must ensure that lending organisations, such as the European Investment Bank and the Centre for the Development of Enterprise, assist SMEs in Africa. More attention should be paid to the informal sector, and that the practice of microfinance should be extended. With regard to Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) , Parliament felt that these must be negotiated as development agreements as much as trade agreements, which meant that they must be based on the principles of asymmetry in favour of the ACP regions, support for ACP regional integration, the establishment of a reliable framework for the promotion of trade and investment in the ACP regions, and the establishment of regional markets prior to any opening up of markets to the EU. It therefore called on the Commission, whenever necessary, to refrain from opening up markets until specific levels of development had been attained and to find solutions while continuing negotiations. The EPAs could become an important tool for African trade and regional integration, provided that their substance fully accorded with development policy objectives, and only on condition that they were "development-friendly", allowing for exemptions and long transition periods where needed in order for domestic producers and industries to adapt to new market situations. Parliament insisted that regional economic communities (RECs) should be the pillars of the African integration process and the establishment of a pan-African market, and should not only be dealing directly with Europe. EPAs should not undermine Africa's own regional integration agenda, but should also be instruments for South-South integration and trade. Investing in people : Parliament insisted that the joint strategy should contribute to gender mainstreaming and to the implementation of concrete actions aimed at the empowerment of women. It stressed that health was one of the most important drivers of economic development and that child mortality rates in particular are a powerful indicator of poverty. The current international commitments to education and health for all needed to be expressly integrated in the joint strategy. 63% of all people in the world infected with HIV live in Africa, and in a number of African countries average life expectancy is falling dramatically as a result of the AIDS pandemic. Universal access to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria services in Africa should be included in the joint strategy. Parliament again stressed that women and girls are particularly vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS, and pregnancy-related complications resulting in high maternal and neonatal mortality. It moved on to emphasise that EU policies, including subsidy policy, must not harm Africa's agricultural sector or jeopardise food security. The EU was urged to offer financial support to the Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Programme', adopted by the AU and NEPAD. Parliament also underlined in relation to the worrying and worsening phenomenon of desertification, the need to support sustainable agricultural methods. The issue of desertification and access to water for all should be of the utmost importance in the joint strategy. Since Africa is the continent predicted to suffer the effects of climate change most severely, Parliament urged the EU, the AU and their Member States, as well as investors and business actors, to acknowledge their responsibility for climate change, and called on them to develop an environment friendly development strategy in order to reverse the situation, including a financial framework for environmental adaptation. The EU must make significant funding available for adaptation measures in African countries. Risk reduction and "climate proofing" measures must be integrated into the overarching development agenda. The joint strategy should also address the root causes of migration and pay particular attention to the rights and the integration of migrants and to the issue of brain drain, particularly in the health sector, by proposing practical solutions to successful circular migration. Parliament went on to acknowledges the usefulness and the relevance of budget support, but called for caution in relation to the disbursement of aid in the form of budget support. Budget support must be treated separately for each country, depending on its particular situation. Implementation and monitoring : Parliament called on the Commission and the general secretariat of the Council to send all further progress reports on the implementation of the EU strategy for Africa to the European Parliament. It also requested information on the disbursement and implementation of the EUR 2.7 billion additional funds under the 10th EDF allocated to the "governance initiatives' developed by the Commission for each ACP country, as well as on how the 9th EDF has been used and reprogrammed. The Commission is asked to propose a joint mechanism for the implement and evaluation of the new joint strategy, both on a technical and political basis, including all the EC financial instruments for development at all stages. The report calls on the Commission to ensure that any monitoring framework includes the monitoring of existing commitments by the AU and EU, such as the MDGs, the Cotonou Agreement, the Abuja Call for Action, and the Universal Declaration on Human Rights. The joint strategy should explicitly include a communications strategy, in order to raise public awareness on what governments are doing and to provide the feedback loop in order to ensure that governments are in touch with the needs of their constituents on these policies. The Commission is asked to indicate how it will finance the new strategy and its programme of action, and to inform the European Parliament and the PAP at all stages of the process (programming, identification, appraisal, financing, implementation and evaluation). Lastly, Parliament called for the first action plan to include a specific financial envelope for pan-African institutions, activities to be implemented at pan African level, and the new partnerships (Lisbon initiatives). National, regional and continent-wide parliaments must be expressly considered as beneficiaries of aid.
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/6/44521
New
  • DEVE/6/44521
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.40.07 Relations with African countries
New
6.40.07
Relations with African countries
procedure/title
Old
The state of play of EU-Africa relations
New
State of play of EU-Africa relations
procedure/subject/0
Old
6.40.07 Relations with the African countries
New
6.40.07 Relations with African countries
activities
  • date: 2007-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: ROCARD Michel body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-01-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARTENS Maria
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2799 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2799*&MEET_DATE=14/05/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2799 council: General Affairs date: 2007-05-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-10-03T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: ROCARD Michel body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-01-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARTENS Maria type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-10-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-375&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0375/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071024&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14112&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-483 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0483/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2007-02-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: PSE name: ROCARD Michel
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-01-30T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: MARTENS Maria
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/6/44521
reference
2007/2002(INI)
title
The state of play of EU-Africa relations
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.40.07 Relations with the African countries