BETA


2007/2006(INI) Thematic strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI BELOHORSKÁ Irena (icon: NA NA)
Committee Opinion AGRI EBNER Michl (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2007/12/20
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/11/21
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/10/24
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/10/24
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Irena BELOHORSKA (NI, SK) in response to the Commission’s communication on the “Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides”. It acknowledged the need for a European legal framework in the field of pesticide use as legislation in force has not proved sufficient to achieve the prevention of the hazards and risks to health and environment posed by the use of pesticides.

Parliament pointed out that the use of plant protection products (PPPs) in the EU between 1992 and 2003 remained significant and has not decreased despite the proactive policies successfully pursued in some Member States to reduce the use of farm pesticides. Undesirable amounts of certain pesticides can still be found in the environment, in particular in soil and water; whereas residues exceeding regulatory limit values are still found in agricultural produce. It is important to adopt new legislation based on an approach more firmly centred on reducing pesticide use and more ambitious in terms of environmental performance, through the provision of proper support for organic farming and integrated production methods.

Members welcomed the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides ('Thematic Strategy') but noted that it covers only PPPs, which constitute only a part of pesticides. The Commission should forthwith include pest control products (biocidal product types 14-19) as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC within the scope of the Thematic Strategy, as they pose similar risks to human health and the environment. The Commission was urged to extend the scope of the Thematic Strategy to include other biocides as soon as possible.

Parliament drew attention to the importance of a system of training and education for professional pesticide users, and recommended that the sale and distribution of pesticides be performed under the supervision of a qualified professional or practitioner, and that those transactions be recorded in a register to ensure adequate control of the marketing and use of such products.

Whilst the measures chosen by the Commission were welcomed, Parliament stressed that ambitious National Action Plans of the Member States are key elements in the whole process, and regretted that the Commission opted for the exclusion of quantitative and qualitative criteria in the National Action Plans, thus reducing their level of ambition. Without quantitative use reduction targets in the National Action Plans, the notion "reduction of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides" is very imprecisely defined, and will not push Member States to lower the amount of pesticides used or to prioritise non-chemical alternatives for plant protection and pest and crop management. The Commission should combine the elimination of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides with quantitative criteria in the National Action Plans, by stipulating that Member States must set their own national targets, timetables and criteria for reducing pesticide use. A commitment to curb the use of PPPs to make them less dangerous and to seek alternative plant protection products which are more environmentally friendly and less harmful to humans and animals will, in addition to environmental and public health benefits, improve the quality of European agricultural products and increase their added value as a result of widespread public awareness and consumer sensitivity regarding these issues.

Parliament went on to regret that, although pesticides are linked to immunological effects, endocrine-disrupting effects, neurotoxic disorders and cancer, health is only marginally mentioned in the Thematic Strategy. It emphasised that substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, or persistent, bio-accumulative or toxic, or which show endocrine disrupting properties, must not be approved as active substances in pesticides. Foetuses, infants, children as well as pregnant women, the elderly, the chronically sick and those with pre-existing medical problems, as well as users of pesticides and rural residents and communities, are more vulnerable and more exposed to pesticides, especially to cumulative effects of different types of pesticides, than the rest of the population. Parliament also called for immediate steps to be taken to ensure that sufficiently frequent checks are carried out on imported goods (which are generally subject to less strict legislation on the use of PPPs meaning that there is a higher risk of illegal residue levels) in all Member States.

Parliament believed that designation of zones, including drinking water catchment protection areas, with reduced or zero pesticide use and enhanced protection of the aquatic environment from pollution by pesticides are necessary in order to avoid unwanted exposure. "Buffer zones" of appropriate width taking account of the different agricultural, geographical and weather conditions should be established. Furthermore, the use of pesticides should be prohibited in and around urban residential areas, public parks, sports grounds, school grounds and children's playgrounds, as the Commission has recognised that the risks to the general public from exposure to pesticides in such areas are high. Aerial praying could only be used where it presents clear environmental advantages or where there are no viable alternatives, but that at the same time it should be obligatory to notify the general public about the time of spraying, the amounts and the type of pesticide.

The report called on the Commission to speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels , which should be set as low as possible unless it can be proved that even the best techniques and methods available cannot prevent residue below a certain level. Member States were asked to improve the monitoring of pesticide concentrations in food products and environmental media.

Parliament welcomed the proposed invitation to Member States to eliminate provisions allowing Member States to apply reduced VAT rates for pesticides , and considered that the Commission should help Member States to introduce appropriate support measures for farmers, to be financed under rural development. It called on the Commission to support the Member States in setting up a system of taxes or levies in order to influence - quantitatively and qualitatively - pesticide use.

Members urged Member States to promote low pesticide-input farming and organic farming, and ensure that professional users of pesticides shift towards a more environment-friendly use of all available crop protection methods, giving priority to non-chemical methods of plant protection and pest and crop management, such as crop rotation and weeding. The Commission and Member States were asked to make adequate resources available for resistance research , for the cultivation and supply of a wide range of crops with various resistance characteristics, for research into crop rotation and soil cultivation methods to combat pests and plant diseases and for innovations in the area of plant protection, including non-chemical alternatives. Parliament stressed that global warming is likely to lead to increased pest populations which may increase the frequency and the intensity of outbreaks. Member States were also asked to ensure the safe storage and handling of pesticides.

Parliament urged the Commission to take into account the extremely worrying issue of mortality amongst domestic bees - a problem associated with the use of certain systemic insecticides (containing the active substances Fipronil and Imidacloprid) in order to treat sunflower and maize seeds.

Lastly, it stresses the need to amend European trading standards relating to the shape, size and aesthetic qualities of fresh fruit and vegetables, which encourage the intensive use of pesticides.

Documents
2007/10/24
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/10/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/07/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/07/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/06/26
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report by Irena BELOHORSKA (NI, SK) in response to the Commission’s communication on the “Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides”.

The report a cknowledges the need for a European legal framework in the field of pesticide use as legislation in force has not proved sufficient to achieve the prevention of the hazards and risks to health and environment posed by the use of pesticides and considers it important to adopt new legislation based on an approach more firmly centred on reducing pesticide use and more ambitious in terms of environmental performance, through the provision of meaningful support for organic farming and integrated production methods.

The report welcomes numerous measures introduced by the Commission, supports the substitution principle, ban on aerial spraying, prohibition of reduced VAT rates, enhanced protection of the aquatic environment, designation of zones with reduced or zero pesticide use. It welcomes in general the measures chosen by the Commission. It stresses, however, that ambitious National Action Plans of the Member States are key elements in the whole process. It regrets, furthermore, that the Commission opted for the exclusion of quantitative and qualitative criteria in the National Action Plans, thus reducing their level of ambition. It suggests that the Commission should combine the elimination of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides with quantitative criteria in the National Action Plans, by stipulating that Member States must set their own national targets, timetables and criteria for reducing pesticide use.

MEPs regret that, although pesticides are linked to immunological effects, endocrine-disrupting effects, neurotoxic disorders and cancer, health is only marginally mentioned in the Thematic Strategy. They emphasise that substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, or persistent, bio-accumulative or toxic, or which show endocrine disrupting properties, must not be approved as active substances in pesticides. They also point out that foetuses, infants, children as well as pregnant women, the elderly, the chronically sick and those with pre-existing medical problems are more vulnerable and more exposed to pesticides, especially to cumulative effects of different types of pesticides, than the rest of the population.

The committee believes that designation of zones, including drinking water catchment protection areas, with reduced or zero pesticide use and enhanced protection of the aquatic environment from pollution by pesticides are necessary in order to avoid unwanted exposure. It considers that “buffer zones” of appropriate width taking account of the different agricultural, geographical and weather conditions should be established; considers that the use of pesticides should be prohibited in and around residential areas, public parks, sports grounds, school grounds and children’s playgrounds, as the Commission has recognised that the risks to the general public from exposure to pesticides in such areas are high.

It also welcomes the creation of a system of training and education for professional pesticide users, for which the Commission should draw up guidelines which take account of the differences which exist between the various European regions. It considers that certification and training must be a prerequisite for the employment of professional pesticide users and that ongoing professional development should also be provided, in order to update their technical skills and knowledge and to ensure safe and effective use of pesticides. It suggests that advisory services to farmers be set up or enhanced in order to increase their awareness concerning safe use of pesticides and encourage the exchange of good practices.

The Commission is invited, inter alia, to : i) to formulate a protection and cooperation policy vis-à-vis the EU's neighbours, on the use of pesticides and PPPs; ii) specify the European financial aid that can be harnessed by Member States to conduct studies, compile databases and enhance knowledge concerning pesticides; iii) work together with the Member States and the industry, to take measures to prevent the import and marketing of counterfeit and/or unauthorised PPPs; iv) ensure that when levels of pesticides which exceed the relevant limit values are found on and in imported foodstuffs the same measures are taken and the same penalties are imposed as in the case of products manufactured in the EU; take immediate steps to be taken to ensure that sufficiently frequent checks are carried out on imported goods (which are generally subject to less strict legislation on the use of PPPs meaning that there is a higher risk of illegal residue levels) in all Member States in the same way, so that European farmers and manufacturers are not placed at a disadvantage and a level playing field is established within the EU; v) call for appropriate controls and a ban on imports into the EU of foodstuffs produced using PPPs and pesticides whose use and marketing are not permitted in the EU; vi) set up coordinated systems for the collection of information on the production, import, export, sale, distribution and use of generally available pesticides; vii) speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels, as the current situation means that there is an uneven playing field within the EU, hampering trade and confusing consumers; viii) set maximum residue levels as low as possible unless it can be proved that even the best techniques and methods available cannot prevent residue below a certain level; in this regard calls for Member States to improve the monitoring of pesticide concentrations in food products and environmental media; propose clear definitions and minimum criteria for IPM, including the increasing percentage of areas under organic farming in Europe and applying compulsory general and crop-specific IPM standards to all cultivated land except land under organic farming.

The Member States are invited to: i) setting up a system of taxes or levies in order to influence - quantitatively and qualitatively - pesticide use; ii) introduce taxes or charges on pesticides as measures facilitating the development of general and specific Integrated Pest Management (IPM) methods and practices; considers that Member States must consider the introduction of a system of levies on pesticides in order to finance education, training and the overall implementation of the National Action Plans; iii) promote low pesticide-input farming and organic farming, and ensure that professional users of pesticides shift towards a more environment-friendly use of all available crop protection products, giving priority to non-chemical alternatives, crop rotation and weeding rather than to systematic use of pesticides; iv) ensure the safe storage and handling of pesticides, and that unused, past-expiry pesticides and empty packaging are collected in a controlled way and obsolete pesticides are treated in accordance with the rules for hazardous waste.

Members also call for coordinated systems for the collection of information on the production, import, export, sale, distribution and use of generally available pesticides.

2007/04/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/03/14
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/02/20
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council welcomed the Thematic Strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides and made a number of conclusions.

In its conclusions, the Council noted that existing legislation fails to address the risks associated with pesticide use, that excessive amounts of pesticides can still be found in the environment – such as in soil and water, and that residues exceeding regulatory limits may still occur in foodstuffs. Accordingly, the Council agrees that it is necessary to reduce risks from pesticides through measures envisaged in the strategy. As such, the Council:

- emphasises that it is important to give a legal framework to Community actions as a contribution to a comprehensive and coherent pesticides policy within each Member State and to fill the gap in the Community’s regulatory framework by establishing general and flexible rules to reduce dependence on pesticides and the risks from pesticide use to human health and the environment;

- welcomes the proposed Regulation on plant protection products;

- emphasises that specific measures to protect surface water and groundwater are required to reduce the risk of pesticides to the aquatic environment; and

- stresses the need for the European Commission, Member States and stakeholders to take forward the measures referred to in the Communication.

On a final point, the Council supports the continued work, at an international level, on the International Code of Conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides.

2007/02/20
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/02/13
   CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2007/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/10/03
   EP - BELOHORSKÁ Irena (NA) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2006/09/11
   EP - EBNER Michl (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2006/07/12
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a strategy on safer use of pesticides.

BACKGROUND: the use of pesticides is recognised as posing threats both to human health and the environment. Despite all the efforts that have been made to limit the risks linked to the use of pesticides and to prevent any undesirable effects, unwanted amounts of certain pesticides can still be found in environmental media (in particular soil and water) and residues exceeding regulatory limits still occur in agricultural produce. It is, therefore, necessary to reduce the risks from pesticides to humans and the environment as far as possible by minimising or eliminating, where possible, exposure and by encouraging the research and development of less harmful, including non-chemical, alternatives.

In order to address these concerns, the Commission is proposing a new strategy aimed at improving the way pesticides are used across the EU. It complements existing EU legislation controlling which pesticides can actually be placed on the market.

CONTENT: The main objectives of this thematic strategy are:

to increase awareness of consumers and society at large about the possible risks from the use of pesticides has recently triggered actions by certain retailers and governments, as well as the Community, to support forms of agriculture and pest management methods that restrict or better target the use of plant protection products, such as organic farming, integrated pest management, or the use of less susceptible varieties. It is important to encourage a rational and precise pesticide use, as well as appropriate crop and soil management practices; to improve the behaviour of pesticide users (in particular professional users), who are responsible for a number of misuses including overuses, by ensuring better training and education; to improve the quality and efficacy of pesticide application equipment is also necessary to enable pesticide users to optimise the effectiveness of the treatments whilst minimising any adverse impact on human health and the environment.

Furthermore, the use of pesticides is affected – directly or indirectly – by legislation in other policy areas, such as water policy, agricultural policy, worker protection and research. The Thematic Strategy will allow the development of a horizontal and cross-cutting approach, well beyond the relatively limited scope of these specific legal instruments.

The specific objectives of the Thematic Strategy that would contribute to achieving the overall objectives are:

– to minimise the hazards and risks to health and environment from the use of pesticides;

– to improve controls on the use and distribution of pesticides;

– to reduce the levels of harmful active substances including through substituting the most dangerous with safer (including non-chemical) alternatives;

– to encourage low-input or pesticide-free cultivation, among others through raising users’ awareness, promoting the use of codes of good practices and promoting consideration of the possible application of financial instruments;

– to establish a transparent system for reporting and monitoring progress made in the fulfilling of the objectives of the strategy, including the development of suitable indicators.

The following measures of the Thematic Strategy will be included in a new Framework Directive of the European Parliament and the Council, which the Commission is proposing in parallel to this Communication:

establishment of National Action Plans by the Member States which will have to set individual objectives to reduce hazards, risks and dependence on chemical control for plant protection (National Action Plans - NAP); involvement of stakeholders in the setting up, implementation and adaptation of the NAP; creation of a system of training of professional pesticide users in order to ensure that those who regularly use pesticides are fully aware of the risks linked to this use and take all appropriate measures to find the least harmful means for solving a plant protection problem; awareness raising of the general public (with particular attention to non-professional users of pesticides) through awareness raising campaigns and information passed on through retailers to ensure that it is better informed; regular and compulsory inspection of application equipment; prohibition of aerial spraying to limit the risks of significant adverse impacts on human health and the environment, in particular from spray drift; enhanced protection of the aquatic environment; defining areas of significantly reduced or zero pesticide use; handling and storage of packaging and remnants of pesticides and other measures connected to the handling of products in order to avoid that they are stored or handled carelessly and possibly pollute the environment; promotion of low pesticide-input farming and creation by Member States of necessary conditions for implementation of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) by farmers; Community-wide standards of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) will be developed and become mandatory as from 2014. Crop-specific standards for IPM will also be developed at Community level, but their implementation will remain voluntary, and Member States could support this activity under rural development; measuring progress in risk reduction through appropriate harmonised indicators, which will be made binding for all Member States for regular reporting; establishment of a system of information exchange at Community level – a Thematic Strategy Expert Group – involving the Member States and all other relevant stakeholders in order continuously to develop and update appropriate guidance, best practices, and recommendations.

In addition, the Commission will incorporate the following measures of the Thematic Strategy into two separate proposals to be adopted at the latest by 2008:

improved systems for the collection of information on distribution and use of plant protection products, at the level of active substances, and regular reporting to tackle the lack of reliable data in particular with a view to the calculation of risk indicators; essential requirements for the protection of the environment to be satisfied by new pesticide application equipment to be placed on the market.

For the time being, the strategy only deals with the largest group of pesticides – plant protection products (PPPs). At a second stage, its scope may be extended to biocides once the impacts of the 1998 Directive on biocidal products have been evaluated. Biocides, e.g. disinfectants, wood preservatives and antifouling paints, are used to control other harmful organisms than those damaging crops or controlling plants.

The Strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides is one of the seven Thematic Strategies that the Commission is presenting, following the provisions of the EU's 6th Environmental Action Programme. The other strategies cover air pollution, marine environment, waste prevention and recycling, natural resources, the urban environment and soils.

2006/07/11
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a strategy on safer use of pesticides.

BACKGROUND: the use of pesticides is recognised as posing threats both to human health and the environment. Despite all the efforts that have been made to limit the risks linked to the use of pesticides and to prevent any undesirable effects, unwanted amounts of certain pesticides can still be found in environmental media (in particular soil and water) and residues exceeding regulatory limits still occur in agricultural produce. It is, therefore, necessary to reduce the risks from pesticides to humans and the environment as far as possible by minimising or eliminating, where possible, exposure and by encouraging the research and development of less harmful, including non-chemical, alternatives.

In order to address these concerns, the Commission is proposing a new strategy aimed at improving the way pesticides are used across the EU. It complements existing EU legislation controlling which pesticides can actually be placed on the market.

CONTENT: The main objectives of this thematic strategy are:

to increase awareness of consumers and society at large about the possible risks from the use of pesticides has recently triggered actions by certain retailers and governments, as well as the Community, to support forms of agriculture and pest management methods that restrict or better target the use of plant protection products, such as organic farming, integrated pest management, or the use of less susceptible varieties. It is important to encourage a rational and precise pesticide use, as well as appropriate crop and soil management practices; to improve the behaviour of pesticide users (in particular professional users), who are responsible for a number of misuses including overuses, by ensuring better training and education; to improve the quality and efficacy of pesticide application equipment is also necessary to enable pesticide users to optimise the effectiveness of the treatments whilst minimising any adverse impact on human health and the environment.

Furthermore, the use of pesticides is affected – directly or indirectly – by legislation in other policy areas, such as water policy, agricultural policy, worker protection and research. The Thematic Strategy will allow the development of a horizontal and cross-cutting approach, well beyond the relatively limited scope of these specific legal instruments.

The specific objectives of the Thematic Strategy that would contribute to achieving the overall objectives are:

to minimise the hazards and risks to health and environment from the use of pesticides; to improve controls on the use and distribution of pesticides; to reduce the levels of harmful active substances including through substituting the most dangerous with safer (including non-chemical) alternatives; to encourage low-input or pesticide-free cultivation, among others through raising users’ awareness, promoting the use of codes of good practices and promoting consideration of the possible application of financial instruments; to establish a transparent system for reporting and monitoring progress made in the fulfilling of the objectives of the strategy, including the development of suitable indicators.

The following measures of the Thematic Strategy will be included in a new Framework Directive of the European Parliament and the Council, which the Commission is proposing in parallel to this Communication:

establishment of National Action Plans by the Member States which will have to set individual objectives to reduce hazards, risks and dependence on chemical control for plant protection (National Action Plans - NAP); involvement of stakeholders in the setting up, implementation and adaptation of the NAP; creation of a system of training of professional pesticide users in order to ensure that those who regularly use pesticides are fully aware of the risks linked to this use and take all appropriate measures to find the least harmful means for solving a plant protection problem; awareness raising of the general public (with particular attention to non-professional users of pesticides) through awareness raising campaigns and information passed on through retailers to ensure that it is better informed; regular and compulsory inspection of application equipment; prohibition of aerial spraying to limit the risks of significant adverse impacts on human health and the environment, in particular from spray drift; enhanced protection of the aquatic environment; defining areas of significantly reduced or zero pesticide use; handling and storage of packaging and remnants of pesticides and other measures connected to the handling of products in order to avoid that they are stored or handled carelessly and possibly pollute the environment; promotion of low pesticide-input farming and creation by Member States of necessary conditions for implementation of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) by farmers; Community-wide standards of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) will be developed and become mandatory as from 2014. Crop-specific standards for IPM will also be developed at Community level, but their implementation will remain voluntary, and Member States could support this activity under rural development; measuring progress in risk reduction through appropriate harmonised indicators, which will be made binding for all Member States for regular reporting; establishment of a system of information exchange at Community level – a Thematic Strategy Expert Group – involving the Member States and all other relevant stakeholders in order continuously to develop and update appropriate guidance, best practices, and recommendations.

In addition, the Commission will incorporate the following measures of the Thematic Strategy into two separate proposals to be adopted at the latest by 2008:

improved systems for the collection of information on distribution and use of plant protection products, at the level of active substances, and regular reporting to tackle the lack of reliable data in particular with a view to the calculation of risk indicators; essential requirements for the protection of the environment to be satisfied by new pesticide application equipment to be placed on the market.

For the time being, the strategy only deals with the largest group of pesticides – plant protection products (PPPs). At a second stage, its scope may be extended to biocides once the impacts of the 1998 Directive on biocidal products have been evaluated. Biocides, e.g. disinfectants, wood preservatives and antifouling paints, are used to control other harmful organisms than those damaging crops or controlling plants.

The Strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides is one of the seven Thematic Strategies that the Commission is presenting, following the provisions of the EU's 6th Environmental Action Programme. The other strategies cover air pollution, marine environment, waste prevention and recycling, natural resources, the urban environment and soils.

Documents

  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)6302/2
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)6028
  • Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
  • Decision by Parliament: T6-0467/2007
  • Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0291/2007
  • Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0291/2007
  • Committee opinion: PE384.426
  • Committee draft report: PE386.500
  • Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0316/2006
  • Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
  • Document attached to the procedure: COM(2006)0372
  • Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
  • Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2006)0372
  • Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex COM(2006)0372
  • Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0316/2006
  • Committee draft report: PE386.500
  • Committee opinion: PE384.426
  • Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0291/2007
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)6028
  • Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2007)6302/2

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/3
date
2007-04-26T00:00:00
docs
title: PE388.390
type
Amendments tabled in committee
body
EP
docs/5/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=0&l=en
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=0&l=en
events/0
date
2006-07-11T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
docs/0
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0316)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0316/2006
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0316)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN)
New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0316)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN)
docs/1
date
2007-02-13T00:00:00
docs
url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0316)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0316/2006
type
Committee of the Regions: opinion
body
CofR
docs/1
date
2007-03-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.500 title: PE386.500
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.500
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE386.500
docs/2
date
2007-03-14T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.500 title: PE386.500
type
Committee draft report
body
EP
docs/2
date
2007-04-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE384.426 title: PE384.426
committee
AGRI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE384.426
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE384.426
docs/3
date
2007-04-18T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE384.426 title: PE384.426
committee
AGRI
type
Committee opinion
body
EP
docs/4
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html title: A6-0291/2007
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html
docs/5
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html title: A6-0291/2007
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/5
date
2007-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)6028
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6
date
2007-11-21T00:00:00
docs
title: SP(2007)6028
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
body
EC
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=1&l=en
events/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html title: A6-0291/2007
events/4
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html title: A6-0291/2007
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE
events/7
date
2007-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0467_EN.html title: T6-0467/2007
summary
events/7
date
2007-10-24T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0467_EN.html title: T6-0467/2007
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 group: Non-attached members abbr: NA
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2006-10-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena group: Non-attached members abbr: NA
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
rapporteur
name: EBNER Michl date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: EBNER Michl group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
docs/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Document attached to the procedure
body
EC
docs/4
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN title: A6-0291/2007
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/5
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN title: A6-0291/2007
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs/5
date
2007-11-21T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)6028
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html
docs/6
date
2007-11-21T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)6028
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
docs/6
date
2007-12-20T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)6302/2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
docs/6/body
EC
docs/7
date
2007-12-20T00:00:00
docs
url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)6302/2
type
Commission response to text adopted in plenary
docs/7/body
EC
events/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2006-07-12T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0291_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-467
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0467_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2006-07-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=372 title: COM(2006)0372 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52006DC0372:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: DIMAS Stavros type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EBNER Michl body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: NI name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2785 council: Environment date: 2007-02-20T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EBNER Michl body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: NI name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0291/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13923&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-467 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0467/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2006-10-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena group: Non-attached members abbr: NA
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AGRI
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: EBNER Michl
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Agriculture and Rural Development
committee
AGRI
date
2006-09-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: EBNER Michl group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2006-10-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: NI name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Environment meeting_id: 2785 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2785*&MEET_DATE=20/02/2007 date: 2007-02-20T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0316)(documentyear:2006)(documentlanguage:EN) title: CDR0316/2006 type: Committee of the Regions: opinion body: CofR
  • date: 2007-03-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.500 title: PE386.500 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2007-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE384.426 title: PE384.426 committee: AGRI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-04-26T00:00:00 docs: title: PE388.390 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN title: A6-0291/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)6028 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2007-12-20T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13923&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)6302/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2006-07-12T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=372 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2006)0372 summary: PURPOSE: to propose a strategy on safer use of pesticides. BACKGROUND: the use of pesticides is recognised as posing threats both to human health and the environment. Despite all the efforts that have been made to limit the risks linked to the use of pesticides and to prevent any undesirable effects, unwanted amounts of certain pesticides can still be found in environmental media (in particular soil and water) and residues exceeding regulatory limits still occur in agricultural produce. It is, therefore, necessary to reduce the risks from pesticides to humans and the environment as far as possible by minimising or eliminating, where possible, exposure and by encouraging the research and development of less harmful, including non-chemical, alternatives. In order to address these concerns, the Commission is proposing a new strategy aimed at improving the way pesticides are used across the EU. It complements existing EU legislation controlling which pesticides can actually be placed on the market. CONTENT: The main objectives of this thematic strategy are: to increase awareness of consumers and society at large about the possible risks from the use of pesticides has recently triggered actions by certain retailers and governments, as well as the Community, to support forms of agriculture and pest management methods that restrict or better target the use of plant protection products, such as organic farming, integrated pest management, or the use of less susceptible varieties. It is important to encourage a rational and precise pesticide use, as well as appropriate crop and soil management practices; to improve the behaviour of pesticide users (in particular professional users), who are responsible for a number of misuses including overuses, by ensuring better training and education; to improve the quality and efficacy of pesticide application equipment is also necessary to enable pesticide users to optimise the effectiveness of the treatments whilst minimising any adverse impact on human health and the environment. Furthermore, the use of pesticides is affected – directly or indirectly – by legislation in other policy areas, such as water policy, agricultural policy, worker protection and research. The Thematic Strategy will allow the development of a horizontal and cross-cutting approach, well beyond the relatively limited scope of these specific legal instruments. The specific objectives of the Thematic Strategy that would contribute to achieving the overall objectives are: – to minimise the hazards and risks to health and environment from the use of pesticides; – to improve controls on the use and distribution of pesticides; – to reduce the levels of harmful active substances including through substituting the most dangerous with safer (including non-chemical) alternatives; – to encourage low-input or pesticide-free cultivation, among others through raising users’ awareness, promoting the use of codes of good practices and promoting consideration of the possible application of financial instruments; – to establish a transparent system for reporting and monitoring progress made in the fulfilling of the objectives of the strategy, including the development of suitable indicators. The following measures of the Thematic Strategy will be included in a new Framework Directive of the European Parliament and the Council, which the Commission is proposing in parallel to this Communication: establishment of National Action Plans by the Member States which will have to set individual objectives to reduce hazards, risks and dependence on chemical control for plant protection (National Action Plans - NAP); involvement of stakeholders in the setting up, implementation and adaptation of the NAP; creation of a system of training of professional pesticide users in order to ensure that those who regularly use pesticides are fully aware of the risks linked to this use and take all appropriate measures to find the least harmful means for solving a plant protection problem; awareness raising of the general public (with particular attention to non-professional users of pesticides) through awareness raising campaigns and information passed on through retailers to ensure that it is better informed; regular and compulsory inspection of application equipment; prohibition of aerial spraying to limit the risks of significant adverse impacts on human health and the environment, in particular from spray drift; enhanced protection of the aquatic environment; defining areas of significantly reduced or zero pesticide use; handling and storage of packaging and remnants of pesticides and other measures connected to the handling of products in order to avoid that they are stored or handled carelessly and possibly pollute the environment; promotion of low pesticide-input farming and creation by Member States of necessary conditions for implementation of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) by farmers; Community-wide standards of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) will be developed and become mandatory as from 2014. Crop-specific standards for IPM will also be developed at Community level, but their implementation will remain voluntary, and Member States could support this activity under rural development; measuring progress in risk reduction through appropriate harmonised indicators, which will be made binding for all Member States for regular reporting; establishment of a system of information exchange at Community level – a Thematic Strategy Expert Group – involving the Member States and all other relevant stakeholders in order continuously to develop and update appropriate guidance, best practices, and recommendations. In addition, the Commission will incorporate the following measures of the Thematic Strategy into two separate proposals to be adopted at the latest by 2008: improved systems for the collection of information on distribution and use of plant protection products, at the level of active substances, and regular reporting to tackle the lack of reliable data in particular with a view to the calculation of risk indicators; essential requirements for the protection of the environment to be satisfied by new pesticide application equipment to be placed on the market. For the time being, the strategy only deals with the largest group of pesticides – plant protection products (PPPs). At a second stage, its scope may be extended to biocides once the impacts of the 1998 Directive on biocidal products have been evaluated. Biocides, e.g. disinfectants, wood preservatives and antifouling paints, are used to control other harmful organisms than those damaging crops or controlling plants. The Strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides is one of the seven Thematic Strategies that the Commission is presenting, following the provisions of the EU's 6th Environmental Action Programme. The other strategies cover air pollution, marine environment, waste prevention and recycling, natural resources, the urban environment and soils.
  • date: 2007-01-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-02-20T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council welcomed the Thematic Strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides and made a number of conclusions. In its conclusions, the Council noted that existing legislation fails to address the risks associated with pesticide use, that excessive amounts of pesticides can still be found in the environment – such as in soil and water, and that residues exceeding regulatory limits may still occur in foodstuffs. Accordingly, the Council agrees that it is necessary to reduce risks from pesticides through measures envisaged in the strategy. As such, the Council: - emphasises that it is important to give a legal framework to Community actions as a contribution to a comprehensive and coherent pesticides policy within each Member State and to fill the gap in the Community’s regulatory framework by establishing general and flexible rules to reduce dependence on pesticides and the risks from pesticide use to human health and the environment; - welcomes the proposed Regulation on plant protection products; - emphasises that specific measures to protect surface water and groundwater are required to reduce the risk of pesticides to the aquatic environment; and - stresses the need for the European Commission, Member States and stakeholders to take forward the measures referred to in the Communication. On a final point, the Council supports the continued work, at an international level, on the International Code of Conduct on the distribution and use of pesticides.
  • date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report by Irena BELOHORSKA (NI, SK) in response to the Commission’s communication on the “Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides”. The report a cknowledges the need for a European legal framework in the field of pesticide use as legislation in force has not proved sufficient to achieve the prevention of the hazards and risks to health and environment posed by the use of pesticides and considers it important to adopt new legislation based on an approach more firmly centred on reducing pesticide use and more ambitious in terms of environmental performance, through the provision of meaningful support for organic farming and integrated production methods. The report welcomes numerous measures introduced by the Commission, supports the substitution principle, ban on aerial spraying, prohibition of reduced VAT rates, enhanced protection of the aquatic environment, designation of zones with reduced or zero pesticide use. It welcomes in general the measures chosen by the Commission. It stresses, however, that ambitious National Action Plans of the Member States are key elements in the whole process. It regrets, furthermore, that the Commission opted for the exclusion of quantitative and qualitative criteria in the National Action Plans, thus reducing their level of ambition. It suggests that the Commission should combine the elimination of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides with quantitative criteria in the National Action Plans, by stipulating that Member States must set their own national targets, timetables and criteria for reducing pesticide use. MEPs regret that, although pesticides are linked to immunological effects, endocrine-disrupting effects, neurotoxic disorders and cancer, health is only marginally mentioned in the Thematic Strategy. They emphasise that substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, or persistent, bio-accumulative or toxic, or which show endocrine disrupting properties, must not be approved as active substances in pesticides. They also point out that foetuses, infants, children as well as pregnant women, the elderly, the chronically sick and those with pre-existing medical problems are more vulnerable and more exposed to pesticides, especially to cumulative effects of different types of pesticides, than the rest of the population. The committee believes that designation of zones, including drinking water catchment protection areas, with reduced or zero pesticide use and enhanced protection of the aquatic environment from pollution by pesticides are necessary in order to avoid unwanted exposure. It considers that “buffer zones” of appropriate width taking account of the different agricultural, geographical and weather conditions should be established; considers that the use of pesticides should be prohibited in and around residential areas, public parks, sports grounds, school grounds and children’s playgrounds, as the Commission has recognised that the risks to the general public from exposure to pesticides in such areas are high. It also welcomes the creation of a system of training and education for professional pesticide users, for which the Commission should draw up guidelines which take account of the differences which exist between the various European regions. It considers that certification and training must be a prerequisite for the employment of professional pesticide users and that ongoing professional development should also be provided, in order to update their technical skills and knowledge and to ensure safe and effective use of pesticides. It suggests that advisory services to farmers be set up or enhanced in order to increase their awareness concerning safe use of pesticides and encourage the exchange of good practices. The Commission is invited, inter alia, to : i) to formulate a protection and cooperation policy vis-à-vis the EU's neighbours, on the use of pesticides and PPPs; ii) specify the European financial aid that can be harnessed by Member States to conduct studies, compile databases and enhance knowledge concerning pesticides; iii) work together with the Member States and the industry, to take measures to prevent the import and marketing of counterfeit and/or unauthorised PPPs; iv) ensure that when levels of pesticides which exceed the relevant limit values are found on and in imported foodstuffs the same measures are taken and the same penalties are imposed as in the case of products manufactured in the EU; take immediate steps to be taken to ensure that sufficiently frequent checks are carried out on imported goods (which are generally subject to less strict legislation on the use of PPPs meaning that there is a higher risk of illegal residue levels) in all Member States in the same way, so that European farmers and manufacturers are not placed at a disadvantage and a level playing field is established within the EU; v) call for appropriate controls and a ban on imports into the EU of foodstuffs produced using PPPs and pesticides whose use and marketing are not permitted in the EU; vi) set up coordinated systems for the collection of information on the production, import, export, sale, distribution and use of generally available pesticides; vii) speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels, as the current situation means that there is an uneven playing field within the EU, hampering trade and confusing consumers; viii) set maximum residue levels as low as possible unless it can be proved that even the best techniques and methods available cannot prevent residue below a certain level; in this regard calls for Member States to improve the monitoring of pesticide concentrations in food products and environmental media; propose clear definitions and minimum criteria for IPM, including the increasing percentage of areas under organic farming in Europe and applying compulsory general and crop-specific IPM standards to all cultivated land except land under organic farming. The Member States are invited to: i) setting up a system of taxes or levies in order to influence - quantitatively and qualitatively - pesticide use; ii) introduce taxes or charges on pesticides as measures facilitating the development of general and specific Integrated Pest Management (IPM) methods and practices; considers that Member States must consider the introduction of a system of levies on pesticides in order to finance education, training and the overall implementation of the National Action Plans; iii) promote low pesticide-input farming and organic farming, and ensure that professional users of pesticides shift towards a more environment-friendly use of all available crop protection products, giving priority to non-chemical alternatives, crop rotation and weeding rather than to systematic use of pesticides; iv) ensure the safe storage and handling of pesticides, and that unused, past-expiry pesticides and empty packaging are collected in a controlled way and obsolete pesticides are treated in accordance with the rules for hazardous waste. Members also call for coordinated systems for the collection of information on the production, import, export, sale, distribution and use of generally available pesticides.
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN title: A6-0291/2007
  • date: 2007-10-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13923&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-467 title: T6-0467/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report by Irena BELOHORSKA (NI, SK) in response to the Commission’s communication on the “Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides”. It acknowledged the need for a European legal framework in the field of pesticide use as legislation in force has not proved sufficient to achieve the prevention of the hazards and risks to health and environment posed by the use of pesticides. Parliament pointed out that the use of plant protection products (PPPs) in the EU between 1992 and 2003 remained significant and has not decreased despite the proactive policies successfully pursued in some Member States to reduce the use of farm pesticides. Undesirable amounts of certain pesticides can still be found in the environment, in particular in soil and water; whereas residues exceeding regulatory limit values are still found in agricultural produce. It is important to adopt new legislation based on an approach more firmly centred on reducing pesticide use and more ambitious in terms of environmental performance, through the provision of proper support for organic farming and integrated production methods. Members welcomed the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides ('Thematic Strategy') but noted that it covers only PPPs, which constitute only a part of pesticides. The Commission should forthwith include pest control products (biocidal product types 14-19) as defined in Annex V to Directive 98/8/EC within the scope of the Thematic Strategy, as they pose similar risks to human health and the environment. The Commission was urged to extend the scope of the Thematic Strategy to include other biocides as soon as possible. Parliament drew attention to the importance of a system of training and education for professional pesticide users, and recommended that the sale and distribution of pesticides be performed under the supervision of a qualified professional or practitioner, and that those transactions be recorded in a register to ensure adequate control of the marketing and use of such products. Whilst the measures chosen by the Commission were welcomed, Parliament stressed that ambitious National Action Plans of the Member States are key elements in the whole process, and regretted that the Commission opted for the exclusion of quantitative and qualitative criteria in the National Action Plans, thus reducing their level of ambition. Without quantitative use reduction targets in the National Action Plans, the notion "reduction of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides" is very imprecisely defined, and will not push Member States to lower the amount of pesticides used or to prioritise non-chemical alternatives for plant protection and pest and crop management. The Commission should combine the elimination of hazards, risks and dependence on pesticides with quantitative criteria in the National Action Plans, by stipulating that Member States must set their own national targets, timetables and criteria for reducing pesticide use. A commitment to curb the use of PPPs to make them less dangerous and to seek alternative plant protection products which are more environmentally friendly and less harmful to humans and animals will, in addition to environmental and public health benefits, improve the quality of European agricultural products and increase their added value as a result of widespread public awareness and consumer sensitivity regarding these issues. Parliament went on to regret that, although pesticides are linked to immunological effects, endocrine-disrupting effects, neurotoxic disorders and cancer, health is only marginally mentioned in the Thematic Strategy. It emphasised that substances which are carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction, or persistent, bio-accumulative or toxic, or which show endocrine disrupting properties, must not be approved as active substances in pesticides. Foetuses, infants, children as well as pregnant women, the elderly, the chronically sick and those with pre-existing medical problems, as well as users of pesticides and rural residents and communities, are more vulnerable and more exposed to pesticides, especially to cumulative effects of different types of pesticides, than the rest of the population. Parliament also called for immediate steps to be taken to ensure that sufficiently frequent checks are carried out on imported goods (which are generally subject to less strict legislation on the use of PPPs meaning that there is a higher risk of illegal residue levels) in all Member States. Parliament believed that designation of zones, including drinking water catchment protection areas, with reduced or zero pesticide use and enhanced protection of the aquatic environment from pollution by pesticides are necessary in order to avoid unwanted exposure. "Buffer zones" of appropriate width taking account of the different agricultural, geographical and weather conditions should be established. Furthermore, the use of pesticides should be prohibited in and around urban residential areas, public parks, sports grounds, school grounds and children's playgrounds, as the Commission has recognised that the risks to the general public from exposure to pesticides in such areas are high. Aerial praying could only be used where it presents clear environmental advantages or where there are no viable alternatives, but that at the same time it should be obligatory to notify the general public about the time of spraying, the amounts and the type of pesticide. The report called on the Commission to speed up Community harmonisation of maximum residue levels , which should be set as low as possible unless it can be proved that even the best techniques and methods available cannot prevent residue below a certain level. Member States were asked to improve the monitoring of pesticide concentrations in food products and environmental media. Parliament welcomed the proposed invitation to Member States to eliminate provisions allowing Member States to apply reduced VAT rates for pesticides , and considered that the Commission should help Member States to introduce appropriate support measures for farmers, to be financed under rural development. It called on the Commission to support the Member States in setting up a system of taxes or levies in order to influence - quantitatively and qualitatively - pesticide use. Members urged Member States to promote low pesticide-input farming and organic farming, and ensure that professional users of pesticides shift towards a more environment-friendly use of all available crop protection methods, giving priority to non-chemical methods of plant protection and pest and crop management, such as crop rotation and weeding. The Commission and Member States were asked to make adequate resources available for resistance research , for the cultivation and supply of a wide range of crops with various resistance characteristics, for research into crop rotation and soil cultivation methods to combat pests and plant diseases and for innovations in the area of plant protection, including non-chemical alternatives. Parliament stressed that global warming is likely to lead to increased pest populations which may increase the frequency and the intensity of outbreaks. Member States were also asked to ensure the safe storage and handling of pesticides. Parliament urged the Commission to take into account the extremely worrying issue of mortality amongst domestic bees - a problem associated with the use of certain systemic insecticides (containing the active substances Fipronil and Imidacloprid) in order to treat sunflower and maize seeds. Lastly, it stresses the need to amend European trading standards relating to the shape, size and aesthetic qualities of fresh fruit and vegetables, which encourage the intensive use of pesticides.
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ENVI/6/44530
New
  • ENVI/6/44530
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.10.09.02 Plant health legislation
  • 3.70.12 Waste management, domestic waste, packaging, light industrial waste
New
3.10.09.02
Plant health legislation
3.70.12
Waste management, domestic waste, packaging, light industrial waste
procedure/title
Old
Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides
New
Thematic strategy on the sustainable use of pesticides
activities
  • date: 2006-07-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2006&nu_doc=372 title: COM(2006)0372 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52006DC0372:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment Commissioner: DIMAS Stavros type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2007-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EBNER Michl body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: NI name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2785 council: Environment date: 2007-02-20T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EBNER Michl body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: NI name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-291&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0291/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071022&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13923&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-467 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0467/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AGRI date: 2006-09-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Agriculture and Rural Development rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: EBNER Michl
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2006-10-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: NI name: BELOHORSKÁ Irena
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/ title: Environment commissioner: DIMAS Stavros
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ENVI/6/44530
reference
2007/2006(INI)
title
Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject