BETA


2007/2024(INI) Single market review: tackling barriers and inefficiencies through better implementation and enforcement

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead IMCO TOUBON Jacques (icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE)
Committee Opinion ECON RYAN Eoin (icon: UEN UEN)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/12/16
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This Commission Staff Working Document covers “The Single Market Review: one year on”. Since November 2007, the Commission has been working with all stakeholders to implement a programme of concrete measures to ensure that the single market is up to the job of continuing to deliver for Europe. The Single Market Review put citizens, consumers, and SMEs at the centre of policy-making. It set out to modernise how the single market delivers these results, through more evidence based tools and through partnership with the Member States.

The Commission concludes that considerable progress has been made over the past year to implement its shared vision for the single market of the 21st century. It notes that 2009 will see a renewed effort to drive the modernisation of single market policy even further and to ensure that it can play its full part as a launch-pad for economic recovery.

Today's single market can deliver tangible results for consumers and SMEs: stronger contractual rights, better quality and a wider choice of products and services at lower prices, effective redress and simpler and better information about their single market rights. It can provide safer medicines and cheaper and safer financial products - bank accounts, savings, investment products and payments. It should over time remove those unjustified obstacles to cross-border buying that few citizens understand.

SMEs can benefit from lower costs and administrative burdens, from simpler company rules and better access to markets in other Member States. They should be able to rely on a simple and single company statute, obtain payments from their debtors more promptly, use electronic procedures instead of paperwork and deal with administrative formalities through one contact point.

Unnecessary barriers for cross-border e-business are being tackled. Public procurement rules make it easier for SMEs to bid for tenders and electronic procurement should bring further savings in costs and effort. Member States will have to screen national rules for service provision to make them simpler and more single market friendly.

All these improvements are either underway or within reach – but many depend on Member States reaching agreement quickly and implementing agreed reforms in a timely manner. The Commission will continue to work in close cooperation with Member States to ensure that the progress made is properly communicated to the public at large, to create consensus and to help rebuild confidence among market players and consumers. This is particularly important at national and local level, where all the existing tools for cooperation, including the communication management partnerships, should be deployed.

The economic crisis has vividly demonstrated the pertinence of the new approach set out in the Single Market Review: the focus on empowering consumers and SMEs, fostering investment and innovation, and developing the social and environmental dimensions of the single market. But recent events have also added a new sense of urgency to the reform process. Getting results will depend on how successfully the EU develops and manages new evidence-based tools and new working methods through a closer partnership with Member States and all stakeholders - consumers, social partners, economic actors and civil society alike.

The European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions are invited to contribute actively to the important work ahead.

2008/12/16
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

This paper presents the progress made in 2008 with the market monitoring initiative, which is still in a pilot phase. Market monitoring relies on a better knowledge of the functioning of markets to achieve its goal to improve the governance of the Single Market. The findings of the market monitoring feed into policymaking by facilitating problem definition and improving policy design.

Market monitoring has been implemented in two stages. In a first stage, a screening has been carried out to identify sectors meriting closer scrutiny. In a second stage, in-depth analyses of market functioning in the sectors identified are being conducted. On the basis of the experience gained, the Commission will be working in 2009 with Member States and industry stakeholders to develop review and adapt the methodology. At the end of the year, the Commission intends to take stock and decide how to proceed with market monitoring in the years to come.

The use of the market monitoring tool is particularly relevant under the current economic conditions. Well functioning goods and services markets can contribute to improve the adjustment capacity of the EU economy and cushion the impact of the financial crisis on the real economy. Moreover, market monitoring can be used to facilitate the dialogue with Member States, business, consumers and other stakeholders, whose support is essential to undertake the required structural reforms. As part of this process of dialogue, this paper intends to inform stakeholders of the progress made with the project and explains how they can get involved with the work. Finally, a well regulated and competitive Single Market should result in increased opportunities for businesses and lower prices and better quality for consumers. This is fully in the spirit of the European Economic Recovery Plan put forward by the Commission on 26 November which highlights the need to boost consumer and business confidence.

This paper: (i) introduces the market monitoring tool and presents its expected benefits in terms of policy making; (ii) presents an update of the sector screening at the EU level, including an analysis of the causes of potential market malfunctioning in the selected sectors as well as the work undertaken at the Member State level; (iii) presents some initial results from the first in-depth market monitoring analyses; and (iv) describes issues to be resolved and next steps to be taken to make a success of the market monitoring initiative.

2007/10/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/10/18
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/09/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/09/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/09/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Jacques TOUBON (EPP-ED, FR) on the Single Market review. The report was adopted by 534 votes in favour to 119 against with 27 abstentions. It welcomed the Commission’s work on the Single Market Review, calling, however, on the Commission and the Member States to close the gap between the potential and the reality of the Single Market. An improvement in the functioning of the Single Market was still necessary. There was a need to complete the opening of network industries, such as transport, telecommunications, postal services and energy transmission, which was the best means of completing the Single Market as part of a responsible market economy facilitated by effective regulatory mechanisms. Parliament also passed an amendment, inviting the Commission to take initiatives to overcome the legal uncertainty regarding the status of services of general interest, notably the state aid and public procurement rules. It welcomed the initiatives of the Commission which aimed to clarify ambiguities in the fields of health services and social services of general interest in the Single Market. Parliament considered strong and modern services of general interest were necessary in order to achieve public interest objectives, such as social and territorial cohesion, environmental protection and cultural diversity.

Parliament went on to stress the following:

new policy initiatives should be more driven by an analysis of the impact they have on various markets, economic sectors and the environment, and in the social sphere; the mobility of workers inside the Union's borders is a major element promoting the competitiveness of businesses, and it stimulates innovation by means of exchanges of expertise and increased competition; a good Single Market policy is fundamental to the stimulation of innovation through increased competition and to a business-friendly environment, which is of particular importance to SMEs; the importance of establishing a Community Patent and a high-quality, cost-effective, innovation-friendly judicial system for European patents which respects the competence of the Court of Justice; the importance of combating fraud and piracy within the Single Market; tackling climate change and ensuring sustainable development are of paramount importance, and can be achieved only with a balanced energy mix, and a Single Market policy promoting sustainable and competitive energy is vital to those ends; the need to make consumer law more effective for the Single Market. The mixed option approach, with a horizontal instrument, is the most appropriate with a view to strengthening consumer confidence. Parliament pointed out that only 6% of consumers make use of cross-border electronic commerce in goods. The Commission was asked to provide support for an appropriate framework for the development of electronic commerce; the continuing development of design standards, with the aim of further improving accessibility for disabled people, the elderly and children; public contracts must be awarded in a fair and transparent manner, observing public procurement rules, and they may also help promote innovation and technological development and help respond to environmental and social concerns, including accessibility for disabled people; the free movement of goods is vital for the efficiency of the Single Market. 25% of the goods manufactured in the EU are still not subject to harmonisation measures; the importance of removing obstacles to the creation of a single payments area, as well as further liberalisation of postal markets, while ensuring the financing of an efficient universal service; further financial integration in the EU is necessary to contribute to sustainable growth, notably via lower transaction costs, wider opportunities for risk sharing and a more efficient allocation of resources; the Commission should investigate tax problems related to personal mail order and Internet shopping, and come forward with proposals for facilitating EU citizens' full benefit from the free movement of goods. Member States should make full use of the principle of mutual recognition to ensure the free movement of goods in the interest of consumers and businesses. Parliament insisted on the pursuit of harmonisation in key areas, in particular retail financial services (including means of payment) and taxation; particular attention should be paid to the Single Market concerns of SMEs, in particular through improvements to the cost and speed of start-up processes, the availability of risk capital/venture capital, the cost and speed of payment services and the mobility of people, goods and services. Parliament called on the Commission to ensure that risk capital from the European Investment Fund usefully reaches SMEs and innovative enterprises; the Commission should push ahead with its proposals concerning a common consolidated corporate tax base; it was important to establish an effective fast-track arbitration redress mechanism to be established at EU level to promote the prompt resolution of disputes concerning Single Market rules. Parliament regretted that insufficient emphasis was placed on the potential contribution of nuclear power.

Parliament moved on to state that boosting competition through regulatory reform is the stimulus that Europe needs to improve productivity, and it reiterated that Parliament's rights in the context of regulatory reform should be fully respected. It called on the Commission to incorporate an 'Internal Market Test' into the better regulation mechanisms, as advocated by Parliament, to ensure that regulators always take into account the implications of their actions on the four freedoms of the Single Market, alongside the other aspects that they are required to consider, notably sustainability and employment.

The report regretted the fact that some Member States are taking measures to protect their national markets, and emphasised the importance of achieving a level playing field across the Single Market, stressing that a well-functioning Single Market constitutes a competitive advantage for Europe in the face of globalisation. It called on the Commission, when framing internal policies, systematically to evaluate similar policies implemented by the EU's major partners, such as the US, Russia, China, India, Brazil, and Japan, with a view to improving the EU's competitiveness and removing barriers to trade.

Lastly, it called on the institutions of the EU to position the Union as an entity with regard to future trends in the global economy so as to ensure both the efficiency of the Union's trade defence and its sustainable competitiveness. Parliament was of the opinion that the Transatlantic Internal Market could be an appropriate instrument to these ends.

Documents
2007/09/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/07/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/07/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/07/09
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report drawn up by Jacques Toubon (EPP-ED, France) on the Single Market review. The report wished the Single Market review to be the occasion for demonstrating to the European public all the benefits that they can gain from the completion of the Single Market, and it called on the Commission and the Member States to close the gap between the potential and the reality of the Single Market. To this end, Members hoped that working relations with national parliaments may be strengthened, and regretted that Member States did not feel enough ownership of the Single Market on a practical level. In a Single Market delivering quality of life, environmental and consumer protection concerns need to be taken into account.

The Committee felt that new policy initiatives should be more driven by an analysis of the impact they have on various markets, economic sectors and the environment, and in the social sphere. It stressed the importance of boosting citizens' confidence by promoting social and environmental objectives common to the Member States, such as quality jobs, equality of opportunity, and protection of health and the environment, while respecting European cultural diversity. The Commission was asked to ensure that the EU performs its protective function in these areas and to avoid regulatory competition between the Member States.

The Committee made a series of recommendations, including the following:

- encouraging the free movement of workers within the Single Market;

- putting in place practical measures designed to support the innovative potential of craft and small enterprises;

- adopting a global strategy concerning intellectual property rights and to strengthen the protection of those rights as a tool to support innovation;

- combating fraud and piracy within the Single Market;

- tackling climate change and ensuring sustainable development;

- increasing consumer confidence in cross-border purchases by putting an end to the fragmentation of the Single Market in the digital environment;

- further improving accessibility for disabled people, the elderly and children;

- encouraging Member States to improve access for SMEs to public procurement contracts and to applying pre-commercial procurement to improve the innovative capacity of the Single Market;

- removing obstacles to the creation of a single payments area, as well as further liberalisation of postal markets, while ensuring the financing of an efficient universal service;

-furthering financial integration in the European Union;

- investigating tax problems related to personal mail order and Internet shopping;

- ensuring that risk capital from the European Investment Fund usefully reaches SMEs and innovative enterprises;

- increasing its staff resources and improve its information strategy;

- establishing an effective fast-track arbitration redress mechanism to be established at EU level to promote the prompt resolution of disputes concerning Single Market rules;

The report welcomed the Commission's initiatives to reduce the administrative burdens for businesses and urged that further efforts of this kind be made to improve access to the Single Market without reducing the necessary protection for citizens, consumers and employees.

The Committee went on to state that boosting competition through regulatory reform is the stimulus that Europe needs to improve productivity, and it reiterated that Parliament's rights in the context of regulatory reform should be fully respected. It called on the Commission to incorporate an 'Internal Market Test' into the better regulation mechanisms, as advocated by Parliament, to ensure that regulators always take into account the implications of their actions on the four freedoms of the Single Market, alongside the other aspects that they are required to consider, notably sustainability and employment.

The report regretted the fact that some Member States are taking measures to protect their national markets, and emphasised the importance of achieving a level playing field across the Single Market, stressing that a well-functioning Single Market constitutes a competitive advantage for Europe in the face of globalisation. It called on the Commission, when framing internal policies, systematically to evaluate and take into consideration similar policies implemented by the EU's major partners, such as the US, Russia, China, India, Brazil, Japan and so on, with a view to improving the EU's competitiveness and removing barriers to global trade.

2007/05/31
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/04/19
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/03/13
   EP - RYAN Eoin (UEN) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2007/02/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2006/12/19
   EP - TOUBON Jacques (PPE-DE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Toubon (A6-0295/2007) - am. 2 #

2007/09/04 Outcome: -: 389, +: 262, 0: 11
PT ES DK AT EE ?? MT FR LU CY NL EL SK BE DE FI SE SI IE IT LV LT RO CZ BG HU GB PL
Total
22
45
13
15
5
1
4
66
5
6
23
14
14
18
86
14
16
4
13
56
7
10
31
22
16
19
68
49
icon: PSE PSE
175

Estonia PSE

3

PSE

1

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
38

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
13

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
36

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ITS ITS
18

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1

Belgium ITS

3

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ITS

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
240

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Belgium PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Toubon (A6-0295/2007) - am. 3 #

2007/09/04 Outcome: -: 388, +: 266, 0: 14
FR PT ES AT DK EE ?? MT LU CY NL BG RO SE BE EL FI SI DE LV SK IE CZ LT HU IT PL GB
Total
64
22
46
15
13
5
1
4
5
6
23
16
32
16
18
14
14
4
87
7
14
13
22
12
19
57
50
69
icon: PSE PSE
175

Estonia PSE

3

PSE

1

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ITS ITS
18

Austria ITS

For (1)

1

Belgium ITS

3

Italy ITS

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Austria NI

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

Against (1)

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
88

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
241

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Belgium PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Rapport Toubon (A6-0295/2007) - am. 13 #

2007/09/04 Outcome: -: 360, +: 294, 0: 8
FR AT PT IE CZ DK ES NL EE ?? BE MT LU CY EL SE BG RO SI LT LV FI DE SK HU GB IT PL
Total
67
15
22
13
21
12
45
22
5
1
18
4
5
6
14
16
16
30
4
12
7
14
86
13
19
69
56
50
icon: PSE PSE
171

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

PSE

1

Malta PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

Against (1)

3

Slovakia PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ITS ITS
16

Austria ITS

For (1)

1

Belgium ITS

Against (1)

3

Italy ITS

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Austria NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
22

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Latvia UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
4

Spain ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
241

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Rapport Toubon (A6-0295/2007) - par. 16/2 #

2007/09/04 Outcome: +: 412, -: 217, 0: 40
FR PL IT RO GB HU ES DE BG LT BE FI CZ SK LV SI LU EE PT EL CY MT ?? NL SE DK AT IE
Total
67
48
56
32
68
20
46
88
16
12
18
14
22
14
7
4
5
5
22
14
6
4
1
23
15
13
16
13
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
243
2

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Abstain (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Austria PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
88
2

Spain ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
33

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

3

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
18

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ITS

3

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
178

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

Against (1)

3

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

3

Malta PSE

Abstain (2)

2

PSE

Against (1)

1
5

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Toubon (A6-0295/2007) - am. 12/rév. #

2007/09/04 Outcome: +: 580, -: 66, 0: 25
DE FR ES GB IT PL RO HU PT BE BG LT FI SK AT NL CZ EL SE IE DK LV LU EE SI MT CY ??
Total
86
65
46
69
57
51
32
21
22
17
16
12
14
14
16
23
22
14
16
13
13
7
5
5
4
4
6
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
242

Belgium PPE-DE

3
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

2
icon: PSE PSE
176

Lithuania PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Sweden PSE

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

2

PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
89

Spain ALDE

1
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

5

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

4

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
18

Italy ITS

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ITS

3

Bulgaria ITS

3

Austria ITS

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (2)

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
23

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Rapport Toubon (A6-0295/2007) - résolution #

2007/09/04 Outcome: +: 534, -: 119, 0: 27
IT PL DE ES GB RO FR PT HU SK BG LT FI EL NL DK BE CZ LV EE MT AT SE LU SI CY IE ??
Total
57
53
88
46
67
32
68
23
21
14
17
11
14
14
24
13
18
22
7
5
5
16
16
5
4
6
13
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
245
2

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: PSE PSE
181

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Sweden PSE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
90

Spain ALDE

1
2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
38

Lithuania UEN

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

Czechia NI

1

Austria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
18

Italy ITS

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ITS

3

Belgium ITS

3

Austria ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
22

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

5

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13927&j=0&l=en
docs/4/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13927&j=0&l=en
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3064/COM_SEC(2008)3064_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3064/COM_SEC(2008)3064_EN.pdf
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3074/COM_SEC(2008)3074_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3074/COM_SEC(2008)3074_EN.pdf
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.697
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE386.697
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.449
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE390.449
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0295_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0295_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13927&j=1&l=en
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0295_EN.html title: A6-0295/2007
events/2
date
2007-07-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0295_EN.html title: A6-0295/2007
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070904&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20070904&type=CRE
events/5
date
2007-09-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0367_EN.html title: T6-0367/2007
summary
events/5
date
2007-09-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0367_EN.html title: T6-0367/2007
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: TOUBON Jacques date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2006-12-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TOUBON Jacques group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: RYAN Eoin date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RYAN Eoin group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-295&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0295_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
docs/4/body
EC
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3064/COM_SEC(2008)3064_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3064/COM_SEC(2008)3064_EN.pdf
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3074/COM_SEC(2008)3074_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3074/COM_SEC(2008)3074_EN.pdf
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-295&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0295_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-367
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0367_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: UEN name: RYAN Eoin body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TOUBON Jacques
  • date: 2007-07-09T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: UEN name: RYAN Eoin body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TOUBON Jacques type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-295&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0295/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-09-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13927&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070904&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-367 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0367/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2006-12-19T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TOUBON Jacques group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats abbr: PPE-DE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: UEN name: RYAN Eoin
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2007-03-13T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: RYAN Eoin group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
IMCO
date
2006-12-19T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: PPE-DE name: TOUBON Jacques
docs
  • date: 2007-04-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE386.697 title: PE386.697 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2007-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.449 title: PE390.449 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-295&language=EN title: A6-0295/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-10-18T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13927&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)5401 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2007-10-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13927&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)5402/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3064/COM_SEC(2008)3064_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)3064 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=3064 title: EUR-Lex summary: This Commission Staff Working Document covers “The Single Market Review: one year on”. Since November 2007, the Commission has been working with all stakeholders to implement a programme of concrete measures to ensure that the single market is up to the job of continuing to deliver for Europe. The Single Market Review put citizens, consumers, and SMEs at the centre of policy-making. It set out to modernise how the single market delivers these results, through more evidence based tools and through partnership with the Member States. The Commission concludes that considerable progress has been made over the past year to implement its shared vision for the single market of the 21st century. It notes that 2009 will see a renewed effort to drive the modernisation of single market policy even further and to ensure that it can play its full part as a launch-pad for economic recovery. Today's single market can deliver tangible results for consumers and SMEs: stronger contractual rights, better quality and a wider choice of products and services at lower prices, effective redress and simpler and better information about their single market rights. It can provide safer medicines and cheaper and safer financial products - bank accounts, savings, investment products and payments. It should over time remove those unjustified obstacles to cross-border buying that few citizens understand. SMEs can benefit from lower costs and administrative burdens, from simpler company rules and better access to markets in other Member States. They should be able to rely on a simple and single company statute, obtain payments from their debtors more promptly, use electronic procedures instead of paperwork and deal with administrative formalities through one contact point. Unnecessary barriers for cross-border e-business are being tackled. Public procurement rules make it easier for SMEs to bid for tenders and electronic procurement should bring further savings in costs and effort. Member States will have to screen national rules for service provision to make them simpler and more single market friendly. All these improvements are either underway or within reach – but many depend on Member States reaching agreement quickly and implementing agreed reforms in a timely manner. The Commission will continue to work in close cooperation with Member States to ensure that the progress made is properly communicated to the public at large, to create consensus and to help rebuild confidence among market players and consumers. This is particularly important at national and local level, where all the existing tools for cooperation, including the communication management partnerships, should be deployed. The economic crisis has vividly demonstrated the pertinence of the new approach set out in the Single Market Review: the focus on empowering consumers and SMEs, fostering investment and innovation, and developing the social and environmental dimensions of the single market. But recent events have also added a new sense of urgency to the reform process. Getting results will depend on how successfully the EU develops and manages new evidence-based tools and new working methods through a closer partnership with Member States and all stakeholders - consumers, social partners, economic actors and civil society alike. The European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions are invited to contribute actively to the important work ahead. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2008-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2008/3074/COM_SEC(2008)3074_EN.pdf title: SEC(2008)3074 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=SECfinal&an_doc=2008&nu_doc=3074 title: EUR-Lex summary: This paper presents the progress made in 2008 with the market monitoring initiative, which is still in a pilot phase. Market monitoring relies on a better knowledge of the functioning of markets to achieve its goal to improve the governance of the Single Market. The findings of the market monitoring feed into policymaking by facilitating problem definition and improving policy design. Market monitoring has been implemented in two stages. In a first stage, a screening has been carried out to identify sectors meriting closer scrutiny. In a second stage, in-depth analyses of market functioning in the sectors identified are being conducted. On the basis of the experience gained, the Commission will be working in 2009 with Member States and industry stakeholders to develop review and adapt the methodology. At the end of the year, the Commission intends to take stock and decide how to proceed with market monitoring in the years to come. The use of the market monitoring tool is particularly relevant under the current economic conditions. Well functioning goods and services markets can contribute to improve the adjustment capacity of the EU economy and cushion the impact of the financial crisis on the real economy. Moreover, market monitoring can be used to facilitate the dialogue with Member States, business, consumers and other stakeholders, whose support is essential to undertake the required structural reforms. As part of this process of dialogue, this paper intends to inform stakeholders of the progress made with the project and explains how they can get involved with the work. Finally, a well regulated and competitive Single Market should result in increased opportunities for businesses and lower prices and better quality for consumers. This is fully in the spirit of the European Economic Recovery Plan put forward by the Commission on 26 November which highlights the need to boost consumer and business confidence. This paper: (i) introduces the market monitoring tool and presents its expected benefits in terms of policy making; (ii) presents an update of the sector screening at the EU level, including an analysis of the causes of potential market malfunctioning in the selected sectors as well as the work undertaken at the Member State level; (iii) presents some initial results from the first in-depth market monitoring analyses; and (iv) describes issues to be resolved and next steps to be taken to make a success of the market monitoring initiative. type: Follow-up document body: EC
events
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-07-09T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report drawn up by Jacques Toubon (EPP-ED, France) on the Single Market review. The report wished the Single Market review to be the occasion for demonstrating to the European public all the benefits that they can gain from the completion of the Single Market, and it called on the Commission and the Member States to close the gap between the potential and the reality of the Single Market. To this end, Members hoped that working relations with national parliaments may be strengthened, and regretted that Member States did not feel enough ownership of the Single Market on a practical level. In a Single Market delivering quality of life, environmental and consumer protection concerns need to be taken into account. The Committee felt that new policy initiatives should be more driven by an analysis of the impact they have on various markets, economic sectors and the environment, and in the social sphere. It stressed the importance of boosting citizens' confidence by promoting social and environmental objectives common to the Member States, such as quality jobs, equality of opportunity, and protection of health and the environment, while respecting European cultural diversity. The Commission was asked to ensure that the EU performs its protective function in these areas and to avoid regulatory competition between the Member States. The Committee made a series of recommendations, including the following: - encouraging the free movement of workers within the Single Market; - putting in place practical measures designed to support the innovative potential of craft and small enterprises; - adopting a global strategy concerning intellectual property rights and to strengthen the protection of those rights as a tool to support innovation; - combating fraud and piracy within the Single Market; - tackling climate change and ensuring sustainable development; - increasing consumer confidence in cross-border purchases by putting an end to the fragmentation of the Single Market in the digital environment; - further improving accessibility for disabled people, the elderly and children; - encouraging Member States to improve access for SMEs to public procurement contracts and to applying pre-commercial procurement to improve the innovative capacity of the Single Market; - removing obstacles to the creation of a single payments area, as well as further liberalisation of postal markets, while ensuring the financing of an efficient universal service; -furthering financial integration in the European Union; - investigating tax problems related to personal mail order and Internet shopping; - ensuring that risk capital from the European Investment Fund usefully reaches SMEs and innovative enterprises; - increasing its staff resources and improve its information strategy; - establishing an effective fast-track arbitration redress mechanism to be established at EU level to promote the prompt resolution of disputes concerning Single Market rules; The report welcomed the Commission's initiatives to reduce the administrative burdens for businesses and urged that further efforts of this kind be made to improve access to the Single Market without reducing the necessary protection for citizens, consumers and employees. The Committee went on to state that boosting competition through regulatory reform is the stimulus that Europe needs to improve productivity, and it reiterated that Parliament's rights in the context of regulatory reform should be fully respected. It called on the Commission to incorporate an 'Internal Market Test' into the better regulation mechanisms, as advocated by Parliament, to ensure that regulators always take into account the implications of their actions on the four freedoms of the Single Market, alongside the other aspects that they are required to consider, notably sustainability and employment. The report regretted the fact that some Member States are taking measures to protect their national markets, and emphasised the importance of achieving a level playing field across the Single Market, stressing that a well-functioning Single Market constitutes a competitive advantage for Europe in the face of globalisation. It called on the Commission, when framing internal policies, systematically to evaluate and take into consideration similar policies implemented by the EU's major partners, such as the US, Russia, China, India, Brazil, Japan and so on, with a view to improving the EU's competitiveness and removing barriers to global trade.
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-295&language=EN title: A6-0295/2007
  • date: 2007-09-04T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13927&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2007-09-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070904&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-09-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-367 title: T6-0367/2007 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drafted by Jacques TOUBON (EPP-ED, FR) on the Single Market review. The report was adopted by 534 votes in favour to 119 against with 27 abstentions. It welcomed the Commission’s work on the Single Market Review, calling, however, on the Commission and the Member States to close the gap between the potential and the reality of the Single Market. An improvement in the functioning of the Single Market was still necessary. There was a need to complete the opening of network industries, such as transport, telecommunications, postal services and energy transmission, which was the best means of completing the Single Market as part of a responsible market economy facilitated by effective regulatory mechanisms. Parliament also passed an amendment, inviting the Commission to take initiatives to overcome the legal uncertainty regarding the status of services of general interest, notably the state aid and public procurement rules. It welcomed the initiatives of the Commission which aimed to clarify ambiguities in the fields of health services and social services of general interest in the Single Market. Parliament considered strong and modern services of general interest were necessary in order to achieve public interest objectives, such as social and territorial cohesion, environmental protection and cultural diversity. Parliament went on to stress the following: new policy initiatives should be more driven by an analysis of the impact they have on various markets, economic sectors and the environment, and in the social sphere; the mobility of workers inside the Union's borders is a major element promoting the competitiveness of businesses, and it stimulates innovation by means of exchanges of expertise and increased competition; a good Single Market policy is fundamental to the stimulation of innovation through increased competition and to a business-friendly environment, which is of particular importance to SMEs; the importance of establishing a Community Patent and a high-quality, cost-effective, innovation-friendly judicial system for European patents which respects the competence of the Court of Justice; the importance of combating fraud and piracy within the Single Market; tackling climate change and ensuring sustainable development are of paramount importance, and can be achieved only with a balanced energy mix, and a Single Market policy promoting sustainable and competitive energy is vital to those ends; the need to make consumer law more effective for the Single Market. The mixed option approach, with a horizontal instrument, is the most appropriate with a view to strengthening consumer confidence. Parliament pointed out that only 6% of consumers make use of cross-border electronic commerce in goods. The Commission was asked to provide support for an appropriate framework for the development of electronic commerce; the continuing development of design standards, with the aim of further improving accessibility for disabled people, the elderly and children; public contracts must be awarded in a fair and transparent manner, observing public procurement rules, and they may also help promote innovation and technological development and help respond to environmental and social concerns, including accessibility for disabled people; the free movement of goods is vital for the efficiency of the Single Market. 25% of the goods manufactured in the EU are still not subject to harmonisation measures; the importance of removing obstacles to the creation of a single payments area, as well as further liberalisation of postal markets, while ensuring the financing of an efficient universal service; further financial integration in the EU is necessary to contribute to sustainable growth, notably via lower transaction costs, wider opportunities for risk sharing and a more efficient allocation of resources; the Commission should investigate tax problems related to personal mail order and Internet shopping, and come forward with proposals for facilitating EU citizens' full benefit from the free movement of goods. Member States should make full use of the principle of mutual recognition to ensure the free movement of goods in the interest of consumers and businesses. Parliament insisted on the pursuit of harmonisation in key areas, in particular retail financial services (including means of payment) and taxation; particular attention should be paid to the Single Market concerns of SMEs, in particular through improvements to the cost and speed of start-up processes, the availability of risk capital/venture capital, the cost and speed of payment services and the mobility of people, goods and services. Parliament called on the Commission to ensure that risk capital from the European Investment Fund usefully reaches SMEs and innovative enterprises; the Commission should push ahead with its proposals concerning a common consolidated corporate tax base; it was important to establish an effective fast-track arbitration redress mechanism to be established at EU level to promote the prompt resolution of disputes concerning Single Market rules. Parliament regretted that insufficient emphasis was placed on the potential contribution of nuclear power. Parliament moved on to state that boosting competition through regulatory reform is the stimulus that Europe needs to improve productivity, and it reiterated that Parliament's rights in the context of regulatory reform should be fully respected. It called on the Commission to incorporate an 'Internal Market Test' into the better regulation mechanisms, as advocated by Parliament, to ensure that regulators always take into account the implications of their actions on the four freedoms of the Single Market, alongside the other aspects that they are required to consider, notably sustainability and employment. The report regretted the fact that some Member States are taking measures to protect their national markets, and emphasised the importance of achieving a level playing field across the Single Market, stressing that a well-functioning Single Market constitutes a competitive advantage for Europe in the face of globalisation. It called on the Commission, when framing internal policies, systematically to evaluate similar policies implemented by the EU's major partners, such as the US, Russia, China, India, Brazil, and Japan, with a view to improving the EU's competitiveness and removing barriers to trade. Lastly, it called on the institutions of the EU to position the Union as an entity with regard to future trends in the global economy so as to ensure both the efficiency of the Union's trade defence and its sustainable competitiveness. Parliament was of the opinion that the Transatlantic Internal Market could be an appropriate instrument to these ends.
  • date: 2007-09-04T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
IMCO/6/45743
New
  • IMCO/6/45743
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2 Internal market, single market
New
2
Internal market, single market
procedure/title
Old
The Single Market Review: tackling barriers and inefficiencies through better implementation and enforcement
New
Single market review: tackling barriers and inefficiencies through better implementation and enforcement
procedure/subject/0
Old
2 Internal market, SLIM
New
2 Internal market, single market
activities
  • date: 2007-02-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: UEN name: RYAN Eoin body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TOUBON Jacques
  • date: 2007-07-09T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: UEN name: RYAN Eoin body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TOUBON Jacques type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-07-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-295&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0295/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2007-09-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13927&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070904&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-367 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0367/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2007-03-13T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: UEN name: RYAN Eoin
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2006-12-19T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE-DE name: TOUBON Jacques
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: MCCREEVY Charlie
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
IMCO/6/45743
reference
2007/2024(INI)
title
The Single Market Review: tackling barriers and inefficiencies through better implementation and enforcement
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
2 Internal market, SLIM