BETA


2007/2102(INI) EU Strategy for Central Asia

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET ÖZDEMIR Cem (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Committee Opinion DEVE BORRELL FONTELLES Josep (icon: PSE PSE)
Committee Opinion INTA MUSCARDINI Cristiana (icon: UEN UEN)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/04/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/03/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/02/20
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/02/20
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drawn up by Cem ÖZDEMIR (Greens/EFA, DE) on an EU Strategy for Central Asia. It recalls the key position of the 5 countries in this region (Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) situated between Europe and Asia, and their importance in terms of energy and trade.

While, overall, Members welcome the greater attention paid by the EU to Central Asia, they regret the sluggish implementation of projects. Parliament is convinced that, while the values promoted by the EU remain the same, the EU's interests, as well as prevailing conditions and opportunities in the five countries, differ widely. It calls for the definition of clear priorities for the EU's relations with each of the five countries. It stresses the importance of sustainable economic development in the region, and the eradication of poverty as the main objective. With regard to the challenge posed by terrorism, Parliament states that enhancing cooperation on security is important, but that any approach to combating radicalisation and extremism that does not balance security needs with human rights and good governance is self-defeating. It calls on both the Council and the Commission to ensure that human rights issues should carry equal weight with the EU's robust approach to energy, security and trade.

Parliament is convinced that certain issues can only be dealt with effectively by means of regional approaches leading to regional solutions (e.g. counter-terrorism, the eradication of human trafficking, counter-narcotics, water management). It urges the EU institutions, therefore, to provide technical help where needed. It calls for the differentiation in the EU's policy regarding its approach to the countries of the region to be based in particular on the human rights situation in each country, their government's respect for OSCE commitments, their development needs and their government's commitments to improving the welfare of citizens, their current and potential importance to the EU as partners in trade, cooperation on energy and in other areas, and dialogue on international issues, and the prospects for success of EU actions, including various forms of assistance.

Members are in favour of the following measures to promote the economic and democratic development of these countries:

-reform of social sectors, health and food security;

-reform of banking and insurance systems, and the establishment of a micro-credit system;

-provide better protection for foreign direct investment;

-make it easier for the countries of Central Asia to use the Generalised System of Preferences;

-strengthen local public structures, and establish a more diversified economic base;

-strengthen the cooperation of these countries on human rights and the rule of law;

-set benchmarks in the area of human rights;

-reform of the judiciary and the fight against corruption;

-strengthening civil society;

-the fight against child labour (especially in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, where children are exploited in the cotton harvesting, tobacco cultivation and coal mining sectors);

-the fight against the root causes of migration and the initiation of dialogue on this issue;

-the fight against the spread of HIV and avian flu.

In addition, Members highlight the geopolitical situation of Central Asia and the growing interest of economic and political powers, such as Russia, the United States, China and Turkey, in the region. Close cooperation with these countries is very important where interests coincide, but without conflicting with human rights concerns. In this regard, they emphasise the key role of Turkey as an EU candidate country in Central Asia, and call on the Council to make the most of Turkey’s historical, economic and cultural relations with certain countries in the region, to promote the implementation of the strategy.

Members regret that the Council’s strategy on Central Asia does not include Mongolia, especially in view of the progress made by Mongolia in establishing a state based on democracy, human rights and the rule of law. It calls on the Council and the Commission to seek a resolution at EU level and to prepare a statement about Mongolia's development.

Parliament considers each of the countries concerned, focusing on the following points:

Kazakhstan : Parliament stresses Kazakhstan's importance for the EU's trade in energy, as its main trading partner in Central Asia. Trade and energy links should be strengthened with this country, which has the world's third largest uranium reserves. The EU should continue its approach of positive engagement towards Kazakhstan but the development of EU-Kazakhstan relations cannot be disconnected from Kazakhstan's efforts to honour its international and OSCE obligations in the field of human rights, fundamental freedoms and democracy.

Kyrgyzstan : Parliament takes the view that all efforts should be made to consolidate the fragile democratic institutions in the areas of democracy, human rights and the rule of law. It calls on the Council and the Commission to step up assistance to this country so as to help to ensure that it undertakes and successfully implements the promised reforms.

Tajikistan : Members note that Tajikistan has been living in a state of precarious stability since 1997, with a President who systematically represses all opposition. They call for the adoption of all necessary measures to respect the International Convention against Torture and express concern over the new draft religious law. They recall that this country is one of the 20 poorest countries in the world and call on those Member States which have yet to ratify the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Tajikistan to do so as soon as possible, as unnecessary delays could send discouraging and unhelpful signals to Tajikistan. Parliament will, itself, aim to give its approval to the PCA in the near future.

Turkmenistan : Members note as a positive, albeit still very limited, sign of change in Turkmenistan the ambition of the new President, Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov, to carry out major reforms of the education system. It believes that the EU is right in responding to Turkmenistan's receptiveness to cooperation in this field. It welcomes the decision to grant amnesty to eleven political prisoners. Parliament draws attention to the urgent need for improvement as regards the dire human rights situation, especially in view of the grave position of small religious communities, and insists that any further development in EU-Turkmenistan relations, must be closely linked to clear evidence that a process of significant improvement in this area is under way, as well as genuine signs that it will continue.

Uzbekistan : Members confirm their full support for the sanctions imposed by the EU on Uzbekistan, following the Andijan massacre. They regret the very limited progress made in relation to human rights, in this country, and note the Council’s decision of 15 October 2007 to extend the arms embargo for another 12 months. To move forward, they support the establishment of a human rights dialogue and stress the need for tangible results to promote all future cooperation with this country.

Energy: Members recall, above all, the need for the EU to speak with one voice on energy policy. They support efforts by the EU to boost gas and oil imports from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and to diversify energy transit routes. It is also necessary to strengthen cooperation between Central Asia and the Black Sea region in the fields of energy and transportation, and to encourage responsible and sustainable use of the region's natural resources, bearing in mind that the environment and respect for the local ecosystem are as important as the issue of energy.

Documents
2008/02/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/02/19
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2007/12/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2007/12/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2007/11/20
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/11/20
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

By adopting the own initiative report by Mr. Cem ÖZDEMIR (Greens/EFA, DE) on an EU Strategy for Central Asia, the Committee on Foreign Affairs recalls the key position of the 5 countries in this region (Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) situated between Europe and Asia and their importance in terms of energy and trade.

While, overall, Members welcome the greater attention paid by the EU to Central Asia, they regret the sluggish implementation of the projects. Recognising the different objectives for each of the countries concerned, drawing on the general analysis of the region, they stress the importance of fair and sustainable economic development in the region, and the eradication of poverty as the main objective to ensure the sustainable emergence of this region.

Faced with the threat of terrorism, they recall the importance of cooperation in terms of security, but also the fight against radicalisation and extremism. This involves the promotion of good governance, human rights and democracy, as well as the strengthening of dialogue with all types of religious communities. In this context, Members call on the Council and the Commission to put the defence of human rights at the heart of cooperation, to the same extent as energy, security and trade.

Members, also in favour of a regional vision on certain issues (counter-terrorism, the eradication of human trafficking, counter-narcotics and water management) through EU technical assistance, consider it necessary to promote an individually tailored approach to cooperation, in order to take into account differences in culture and development in these countries.

Members are also in favour of the following measures to promote the economic and democratic development of these countries:

reform of social sectors, health and food security; membership of the World Trade Organisation (WTO); reform of banking and insurance systems, and the establishment of an efficient micro-credit system; provide better protection for foreign direct investment; make it easier for the countries of Central Asia to use the Generalised System of Preferences; strengthen local public structures, and establish a more efficient and diversified economic base; strengthen the cooperation of these countries on human rights, the rule of law, good governance and democratisation; set benchmarks in the area of human rights and the fight against all types of persecution of human rights defenders in these countries; reform of the judiciary and the fight against corruption; strengthening civil society; the fight against child labour (especially in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, where children are exploited in the cotton harvesting, tobacco cultivation and coal mining sectors); the fight against the root causes of migration and the initiation of dialogue on this issue; the fight against the spread of HIV and avian flu.

In addition, Members highlight the geopolitical situation of Central Asia and the growing interest of economic and political powers, such as Russia, the United States, China and Turkey, in the region. Close cooperation with these countries is very important where interests coincide, but “without conflicting with human rights concerns”. In this regard, they emphasise the key role of Turkey as an EU candidate country in Central Asia , and call on the Council to make the most of Turkey’s historical, economic and cultural relations with certain countries in the region, to promote the implementation of the strategy.

Members regret, however, that the Council’s strategy on Central Asia does not include Mongolia, especially in view of the substantial progress made by Mongolia in terms of democracy.

The report considers each of the countries concerned, focusing on the following points:

Kazakhstan : in this country, priority should be given to the strengthening of civil society, with a view to promoting free and democratic elections. Trade and energy links should be strengthened with this country, which has the world's third largest uranium reserves. MEPs also await further progress on freedom of the press; Kyrgyz Republic : Members welcome the progress made by this country in terms of democracy. However, they are concerned about the new Kyrgyz Constitution, which could significantly alter the balance of power in the future; Tajikistan : Members note the positive development of Tajikistan , even though it is in a state of precarious stability, with a President who systematically represses all opposition. They call for the adoption of all necessary measures to respect the International Convention against Torture and express concern over the new draft religious law. They recall that this country is one of the 20 poorest countries in the world and call on those Member States which have yet to ratify the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with Tajikistan to do so as soon as possible; Turkmenistan : Members regret the lack of progress made by this country in terms of respecting individual liberties. In particular, they regret the fact that several political prisoners remain imprisoned, despite the fact that the new President (Mr. Berdymukhammedov) recently decided to grant amnesty to 11 of them. Faced with the particularly disastrous situation in terms of human rights, MEPs insist that any further development in EU-Turkmenistan relations (including the possible conclusion of the PCA) must be closely linked to clear evidence of progress in democracy; Uzbekistan : Members confirm their full support for the sanctions imposed by the EU on Uzbekistan, following the Andijan massacre. They regret the very limited progress made in relation to human rights, in this country, and note the Council’s decision of 15 October 2007 to extend the arms embargo for another 12 months. To move forward, they support the establishment of a human rights dialogue and stress the need for tangible results to promote all future cooperation with this country. Energy: Members recall, above all, the need for the EU to speak with one voice on energy policy. They support efforts by the European Union to boost gas and oil imports from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and to diversify energy transit routes. It is also necessary to further strengthen cooperation between Central Asia and the Black Sea region in the fields of energy and transportation, and to encourage responsible and sustainable use of the region's natural resources, bearing in mind that the environment and respect of the local ecosystem are as important as the issue of energy.

2007/11/06
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/10/29
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/09/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/07/17
   EP - BORRELL FONTELLES Josep (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2007/06/18
   CSL - Debate in Council
Details

The Council approved a strategy for a new partnership with Central Asia (Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan), and agreed to submit it to the European Council at its meeting on 21 and 22 June ( see Council document: 10113/07 ).

The strategy identifies the EU's strategic interests in the region, as regards both bilateral and regional cooperation, and suggests avenues for a partnership in areas such as: youth and education; human rights, the rule of law, governance and democratisation; economic development, trade and investment; energy and transport links; environmental sustainability and water; combating common threats and challenges.

Documents
2007/06/18
   CSL - Council Meeting
2007/06/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/05/08
   EP - MUSCARDINI Cristiana (UEN) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2007/04/17
   EP - ÖZDEMIR Cem (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE394.032&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-394032_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.943&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-393943_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14435&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14435&j=1&l=en
docs/6/docs/0/url
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14435&j=1&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.404
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE390.404
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.481
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE396.481
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE394.032&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE394.032&secondRef=02
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.943&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.943&secondRef=02
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0503_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0503_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2007-12-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0503_EN.html title: A6-0503/2007
events/3
date
2007-12-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0503_EN.html title: A6-0503/2007
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080219&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080219&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-02-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0059_EN.html title: T6-0059/2008
summary
events/6
date
2008-02-20T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0059_EN.html title: T6-0059/2008
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: ÖZDEMIR Cem date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2007-04-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ÖZDEMIR Cem group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2007-07-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana date: 2007-05-08T00:00:00 group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2007-05-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-503&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0503_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-503&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2007-0503_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-59
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0059_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ÖZDEMIR Cem body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2007-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: UEN name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2809 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2809*&MEET_DATE=18/06/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2809 council: General Affairs date: 2007-06-18T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ÖZDEMIR Cem body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2007-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: UEN name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-503&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0503/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-02-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080219&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14435&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-59 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0059/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2007-04-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ÖZDEMIR Cem group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2007-04-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: ÖZDEMIR Cem
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2007-07-17T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
DEVE
date
2007-07-17T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PSE name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2007-05-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana group: Union for Europe of the Nations abbr: UEN
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2007-05-08T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: UEN name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 2809 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2809*&MEET_DATE=18/06/2007 date: 2007-06-18T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE390.404 title: PE390.404 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2007-10-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.481 title: PE396.481 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE394.032&secondRef=02 title: PE394.032 committee: DEVE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.943&secondRef=02 title: PE393.943 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-503&language=EN title: A6-0503/2007 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-03-31T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14435&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)1767 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-04-16T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14435&j=1&l=en title: SP(2008)1857/3 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-06-18T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2809*&MEET_DATE=18/06/2007 title: 2809 summary: The Council approved a strategy for a new partnership with Central Asia (Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan), and agreed to submit it to the European Council at its meeting on 21 and 22 June ( see Council document: 10113/07 ). The strategy identifies the EU's strategic interests in the region, as regards both bilateral and regional cooperation, and suggests avenues for a partnership in areas such as: youth and education; human rights, the rule of law, governance and democratisation; economic development, trade and investment; energy and transport links; environmental sustainability and water; combating common threats and challenges.
  • date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: By adopting the own initiative report by Mr. Cem ÖZDEMIR (Greens/EFA, DE) on an EU Strategy for Central Asia, the Committee on Foreign Affairs recalls the key position of the 5 countries in this region (Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) situated between Europe and Asia and their importance in terms of energy and trade. While, overall, Members welcome the greater attention paid by the EU to Central Asia, they regret the sluggish implementation of the projects. Recognising the different objectives for each of the countries concerned, drawing on the general analysis of the region, they stress the importance of fair and sustainable economic development in the region, and the eradication of poverty as the main objective to ensure the sustainable emergence of this region. Faced with the threat of terrorism, they recall the importance of cooperation in terms of security, but also the fight against radicalisation and extremism. This involves the promotion of good governance, human rights and democracy, as well as the strengthening of dialogue with all types of religious communities. In this context, Members call on the Council and the Commission to put the defence of human rights at the heart of cooperation, to the same extent as energy, security and trade. Members, also in favour of a regional vision on certain issues (counter-terrorism, the eradication of human trafficking, counter-narcotics and water management) through EU technical assistance, consider it necessary to promote an individually tailored approach to cooperation, in order to take into account differences in culture and development in these countries. Members are also in favour of the following measures to promote the economic and democratic development of these countries: reform of social sectors, health and food security; membership of the World Trade Organisation (WTO); reform of banking and insurance systems, and the establishment of an efficient micro-credit system; provide better protection for foreign direct investment; make it easier for the countries of Central Asia to use the Generalised System of Preferences; strengthen local public structures, and establish a more efficient and diversified economic base; strengthen the cooperation of these countries on human rights, the rule of law, good governance and democratisation; set benchmarks in the area of human rights and the fight against all types of persecution of human rights defenders in these countries; reform of the judiciary and the fight against corruption; strengthening civil society; the fight against child labour (especially in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, where children are exploited in the cotton harvesting, tobacco cultivation and coal mining sectors); the fight against the root causes of migration and the initiation of dialogue on this issue; the fight against the spread of HIV and avian flu. In addition, Members highlight the geopolitical situation of Central Asia and the growing interest of economic and political powers, such as Russia, the United States, China and Turkey, in the region. Close cooperation with these countries is very important where interests coincide, but “without conflicting with human rights concerns”. In this regard, they emphasise the key role of Turkey as an EU candidate country in Central Asia , and call on the Council to make the most of Turkey’s historical, economic and cultural relations with certain countries in the region, to promote the implementation of the strategy. Members regret, however, that the Council’s strategy on Central Asia does not include Mongolia, especially in view of the substantial progress made by Mongolia in terms of democracy. The report considers each of the countries concerned, focusing on the following points: Kazakhstan : in this country, priority should be given to the strengthening of civil society, with a view to promoting free and democratic elections. Trade and energy links should be strengthened with this country, which has the world's third largest uranium reserves. MEPs also await further progress on freedom of the press; Kyrgyz Republic : Members welcome the progress made by this country in terms of democracy. However, they are concerned about the new Kyrgyz Constitution, which could significantly alter the balance of power in the future; Tajikistan : Members note the positive development of Tajikistan , even though it is in a state of precarious stability, with a President who systematically represses all opposition. They call for the adoption of all necessary measures to respect the International Convention against Torture and express concern over the new draft religious law. They recall that this country is one of the 20 poorest countries in the world and call on those Member States which have yet to ratify the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with Tajikistan to do so as soon as possible; Turkmenistan : Members regret the lack of progress made by this country in terms of respecting individual liberties. In particular, they regret the fact that several political prisoners remain imprisoned, despite the fact that the new President (Mr. Berdymukhammedov) recently decided to grant amnesty to 11 of them. Faced with the particularly disastrous situation in terms of human rights, MEPs insist that any further development in EU-Turkmenistan relations (including the possible conclusion of the PCA) must be closely linked to clear evidence of progress in democracy; Uzbekistan : Members confirm their full support for the sanctions imposed by the EU on Uzbekistan, following the Andijan massacre. They regret the very limited progress made in relation to human rights, in this country, and note the Council’s decision of 15 October 2007 to extend the arms embargo for another 12 months. To move forward, they support the establishment of a human rights dialogue and stress the need for tangible results to promote all future cooperation with this country. Energy: Members recall, above all, the need for the EU to speak with one voice on energy policy. They support efforts by the European Union to boost gas and oil imports from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and to diversify energy transit routes. It is also necessary to further strengthen cooperation between Central Asia and the Black Sea region in the fields of energy and transportation, and to encourage responsible and sustainable use of the region's natural resources, bearing in mind that the environment and respect of the local ecosystem are as important as the issue of energy.
  • date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-503&language=EN title: A6-0503/2007
  • date: 2008-02-19T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080219&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-02-20T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14435&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-02-20T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-59 title: T6-0059/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution based on the own-initiative report drawn up by Cem ÖZDEMIR (Greens/EFA, DE) on an EU Strategy for Central Asia. It recalls the key position of the 5 countries in this region (Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) situated between Europe and Asia, and their importance in terms of energy and trade. While, overall, Members welcome the greater attention paid by the EU to Central Asia, they regret the sluggish implementation of projects. Parliament is convinced that, while the values promoted by the EU remain the same, the EU's interests, as well as prevailing conditions and opportunities in the five countries, differ widely. It calls for the definition of clear priorities for the EU's relations with each of the five countries. It stresses the importance of sustainable economic development in the region, and the eradication of poverty as the main objective. With regard to the challenge posed by terrorism, Parliament states that enhancing cooperation on security is important, but that any approach to combating radicalisation and extremism that does not balance security needs with human rights and good governance is self-defeating. It calls on both the Council and the Commission to ensure that human rights issues should carry equal weight with the EU's robust approach to energy, security and trade. Parliament is convinced that certain issues can only be dealt with effectively by means of regional approaches leading to regional solutions (e.g. counter-terrorism, the eradication of human trafficking, counter-narcotics, water management). It urges the EU institutions, therefore, to provide technical help where needed. It calls for the differentiation in the EU's policy regarding its approach to the countries of the region to be based in particular on the human rights situation in each country, their government's respect for OSCE commitments, their development needs and their government's commitments to improving the welfare of citizens, their current and potential importance to the EU as partners in trade, cooperation on energy and in other areas, and dialogue on international issues, and the prospects for success of EU actions, including various forms of assistance. Members are in favour of the following measures to promote the economic and democratic development of these countries: -reform of social sectors, health and food security; -reform of banking and insurance systems, and the establishment of a micro-credit system; -provide better protection for foreign direct investment; -make it easier for the countries of Central Asia to use the Generalised System of Preferences; -strengthen local public structures, and establish a more diversified economic base; -strengthen the cooperation of these countries on human rights and the rule of law; -set benchmarks in the area of human rights; -reform of the judiciary and the fight against corruption; -strengthening civil society; -the fight against child labour (especially in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, where children are exploited in the cotton harvesting, tobacco cultivation and coal mining sectors); -the fight against the root causes of migration and the initiation of dialogue on this issue; -the fight against the spread of HIV and avian flu. In addition, Members highlight the geopolitical situation of Central Asia and the growing interest of economic and political powers, such as Russia, the United States, China and Turkey, in the region. Close cooperation with these countries is very important where interests coincide, but without conflicting with human rights concerns. In this regard, they emphasise the key role of Turkey as an EU candidate country in Central Asia, and call on the Council to make the most of Turkey’s historical, economic and cultural relations with certain countries in the region, to promote the implementation of the strategy. Members regret that the Council’s strategy on Central Asia does not include Mongolia, especially in view of the progress made by Mongolia in establishing a state based on democracy, human rights and the rule of law. It calls on the Council and the Commission to seek a resolution at EU level and to prepare a statement about Mongolia's development. Parliament considers each of the countries concerned, focusing on the following points: Kazakhstan : Parliament stresses Kazakhstan's importance for the EU's trade in energy, as its main trading partner in Central Asia. Trade and energy links should be strengthened with this country, which has the world's third largest uranium reserves. The EU should continue its approach of positive engagement towards Kazakhstan but the development of EU-Kazakhstan relations cannot be disconnected from Kazakhstan's efforts to honour its international and OSCE obligations in the field of human rights, fundamental freedoms and democracy. Kyrgyzstan : Parliament takes the view that all efforts should be made to consolidate the fragile democratic institutions in the areas of democracy, human rights and the rule of law. It calls on the Council and the Commission to step up assistance to this country so as to help to ensure that it undertakes and successfully implements the promised reforms. Tajikistan : Members note that Tajikistan has been living in a state of precarious stability since 1997, with a President who systematically represses all opposition. They call for the adoption of all necessary measures to respect the International Convention against Torture and express concern over the new draft religious law. They recall that this country is one of the 20 poorest countries in the world and call on those Member States which have yet to ratify the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with Tajikistan to do so as soon as possible, as unnecessary delays could send discouraging and unhelpful signals to Tajikistan. Parliament will, itself, aim to give its approval to the PCA in the near future. Turkmenistan : Members note as a positive, albeit still very limited, sign of change in Turkmenistan the ambition of the new President, Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov, to carry out major reforms of the education system. It believes that the EU is right in responding to Turkmenistan's receptiveness to cooperation in this field. It welcomes the decision to grant amnesty to eleven political prisoners. Parliament draws attention to the urgent need for improvement as regards the dire human rights situation, especially in view of the grave position of small religious communities, and insists that any further development in EU-Turkmenistan relations, must be closely linked to clear evidence that a process of significant improvement in this area is under way, as well as genuine signs that it will continue. Uzbekistan : Members confirm their full support for the sanctions imposed by the EU on Uzbekistan, following the Andijan massacre. They regret the very limited progress made in relation to human rights, in this country, and note the Council’s decision of 15 October 2007 to extend the arms embargo for another 12 months. To move forward, they support the establishment of a human rights dialogue and stress the need for tangible results to promote all future cooperation with this country. Energy: Members recall, above all, the need for the EU to speak with one voice on energy policy. They support efforts by the EU to boost gas and oil imports from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and to diversify energy transit routes. It is also necessary to strengthen cooperation between Central Asia and the Black Sea region in the fields of energy and transportation, and to encourage responsible and sustainable use of the region's natural resources, bearing in mind that the environment and respect for the local ecosystem are as important as the issue of energy.
  • date: 2008-02-20T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/6/49705
New
  • AFET/6/49705
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.40.04.06 Relations with Central Asian countries
New
6.40.04.06
Relations with central Asian countries
procedure/title
Old
An EU Strategy for Central Asia
New
EU Strategy for Central Asia
activities
  • date: 2007-06-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ÖZDEMIR Cem body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2007-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: UEN name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 2809 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2809*&MEET_DATE=18/06/2007 type: Debate in Council title: 2809 council: General Affairs date: 2007-06-18T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2007-11-20T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ÖZDEMIR Cem body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2007-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: UEN name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2007-503&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0503/2007 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-02-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080219&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-02-20T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14435&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-59 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0059/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2007-04-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: ÖZDEMIR Cem
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: DEVE date: 2007-07-17T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PSE name: BORRELL FONTELLES Josep
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2007-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: UEN name: MUSCARDINI Cristiana
links
other
  • body: EC dg: External Relations commissioner: FERRERO-WALDNER Benita
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/6/49705
reference
2007/2102(INI)
title
An EU Strategy for Central Asia
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
6.40.04.06 Relations with Central Asian countries