BETA


2007/2182(INI) Gender equality and women empowerment in development cooperation

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE
Committee Opinion FEMM CREȚU Gabriela (icon: PSE PSE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2008/05/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/04/09
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2008/03/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2008/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2008/03/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted, by 347 votes to 136 with 44 abstentions, a resolution on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in Development Cooperation in response to the Commission Communication on the subject. The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Feleknas UCA (GUE/NGL, DE) on behalf of the Development Committee.

While welcoming, in theory, the Commission’s strategy, MEPs deplore the fact that, since 1995, when the Council first declared consideration of the gender perspective in development cooperation to be a principle underpinning the development policy of the Community, not enough has been done in practice.

Members also regret the fact that most Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Country Strategy Papers refer to gender as a cross-cutting area. They call for gender-specific targets and activities to be included in future strategies. Parliament regrets that only 5% of the DCI funds for the thematic programme 'Investing in People' (2007-2013) are allocated to gender equality and that regional and country strategy papers do not give an overview of budget allocation to gender equality since gender is only mentioned as a cross-cutting issue and thus no financial details are provided. The Commission and Member States are called upon to take action in development cooperation with concrete and measurable effects on gender relations (amending laws, institutions and existing patriarchal patterns, increasing budgetary resources and improving social and economic conditions for women).

On a general note, MEPs call on the Commission to undertake a gender analysis at every stage of policy design, implementation and evaluation so as to ensure that all forms of gender-based discrimination are eliminated and so as to protect and promote women’s human rights. In particular, the Commission is urged, when drawing up development cooperation policies, to support measures to strengthen the legal status of women, further promoting equal access to decent work as well as fundamental human and social rights, and paying particular attention to the increasing number of migrant women and their increasing vulnerability, so that women do not become the new exploited class of society. Parliament also calls on the Commission to evaluate the potential effect of Economic Partnership Agreements from the gender perspective.

Parliament welcomes programmes addressing female victims of violence but criticises strongly the fact that measures to combat violence against women are not part of the Commission’s strategy. Members condemn any legal, cultural or religious practices that discriminate against women, exclude them from political and public life and segregate them in their daily lives, as well as those that condone genital mutation, rape, domestic violence, forced marriage, honour killings, any obligation against the woman's own will to observe specific dress codes, harassment for not conforming to gender-related norms or rules, trafficking and forced labour. The Commission and Member States are urged to combat these practices in development cooperation policies. Parliament deplores in the strongest possible terms the virtual chattel status of women trapped under Sharia law, and regards this oppression as representing the diametric opposite of every principle which Parliament holds to be of paramount importance.

Recalling that in sub-Saharan Africa, 57 per cent of adults with HIV are women, Parliament invites the Commission and the Member States to develop specific, time-bound and measurable commitments ― backed by the allocation of adequate resources ― to achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support for all women and girls by 2010. MEPs also call on the Commission to strengthen its political leadership role in health policies, addressing currently neglected women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) issues. They emphasises the importance of putting women at the centre of water supply, sanitation and hygiene and emphasises, therefore, the importance of increasing access to safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and water for productive uses;

In order to promote the development of local communities, the Commission is called upon to develop policies that encourage women to form self help groups and set up on their own and, in collaboration with international organisations (such as Finance PlaNet), to expand the microfinance network so that more women can take out loans in order to improve their economic status.

Parliament points out that the ability of women to influence the development of their own lives is contingent on their education. It stresses the need to further promote access to education and vocational training at all levels for girls and to support education policies that are equitable and of a high standard, by providing teachers with training in gender issues and supporting reform of the curriculum to include gender equality, sexual and reproductive health and women's empowerment issues.

Lastly, Members emphasise the importance of encouraging donor coordination for gender mainstreaming and, improving dialogue and communication to achieve a common understanding of gender concepts and appropriate methodology.

Documents
2008/03/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2008/02/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2008/02/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2008/01/29
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Feleknas UCA (GUE/NGL, DE) in response to the Commission’s Communication entitled “Gender Equality and Women Empowerment in Development Cooperation” (COM(2007)0100).

While welcoming, in theory, the Commission’s strategy, MEPs regret the fact that, since 1995, when the Council first declared consideration of the gender perspective in development cooperation to be a principle underpinning the development policy of the Community, not enough has been done in practice.

Members also regret the fact that most Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Country Strategy Papers refer to gender as a cross-cutting area. They call for gender-specific targets and activities to be included in future strategies. The Commission and Member States are called upon to take action in development cooperation with concrete and measurable effects on gender relations (amending laws, institutions and existing patriarchal patterns, increasing budgetary resources and improving social and economic conditions for women).

On a general note, MEPs call on the Commission to undertake a gender analysis at every stage of policy design, implementation and evaluation so as to ensure that all forms of gender-based discrimination are eliminated and so as to protect and promote women’s human rights. In particular, the Commission is urged, when drawing up development cooperation policies, to support measures to strengthen the legal status of women, further promoting equal access to decent work as well as fundamental human and social rights, and paying particular attention to the increasing number of migrant women and their increasing vulnerability, so that women do not become the new exploited class of society.

The report welcomes programmes addressing female victims of violence but criticises strongly the fact that measures to combat violence against women are not part of the Commission’s strategy. Members condemn any legal, cultural or religious practices that discriminate against women, exclude them from political and public life and segregate them in their daily lives, as well as those that condone genital mutation, rape, domestic violence, forced marriage, honour killings, any obligation against the woman's own will to observe specific dress codes, and harassment for not conforming to gender-related norms or rules. The Commission and Member States are urged to combat these practices in development cooperation policies.

Recalling that in sub-Saharan Africa, 57 per cent of adults with HIV are women, the report invites the Commission and the Member States to develop specific, time-bound and measurable commitments ― backed by the allocation of adequate resources ― to achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support for all women and girls by 2010. MEPs also call on the Commission to strengthen its political leadership role in health policies, addressing currently neglected women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) issues.

In order to promote the development of local communities, the Commission is called upon to develop policies that encourage women to form self help groups and set up on their own and, in collaboration with international organisations (such as Finance PlaNet), to expand the microfinance network so that more women can take out loans in order to improve their economic status.

The report stresses the need to further promote access to education and vocational training at all levels for girls and to support education policies that are equitable and of a high standard, by providing teachers with training in gender issues and supporting reform of the curriculum to include gender equality, sexual and reproductive health and women's empowerment issues.

Lastly, Members emphasise the importance of encouraging donor coordination for gender mainstreaming and, improving dialogue and communication to achieve a common understanding of gender concepts and appropriate methodology.

2008/01/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2007/11/26
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2007/11/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2007/09/27
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2007/09/27
   EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2007/06/26
   EP - CREȚU Gabriela (PSE) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2007/03/08
   EC - Document attached to the procedure
Details

PURPOSE: to propose a Programme of Action to support gender equality in development cooperation.

CONTENT: women are at the centre of sustainable social and economic development, poverty reduction and environmental protection in developing countries Despite this, gender inequality is part of the daily experience of a large proportion of the world’s women. Therefore, the role of women in employment and economic activities is often underestimated because most women work in the informal sectors, often with low productivity and incomes, poor working conditions, with little or no social protection. For example, in Africa women constitute 52% of the total population, while they produce and market 60 to 80% of food. The female labour force in sub-Saharan Africa in 2005 was about 73 million, representing 34% of those employed in the formal sector, earning only 10% of the income while owning 1%of the assets.

Inequalities can also be seen in terms of decision-making with a very low rate of female representation in positions of power or even in terms of education (as an example, 57% of school age children outside of education are girls, while two thirds of illiterate people in the world are women). Moreover, the sexual and reproductive health of women remains precarious and many of the modest gains in women’s health made in recent decades are now threatened by the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Women are also the main victims of domestic violence and armed conflict.

The ability of women and girls to empower themselves economically and socially by going to school or by engaging in productive and civic activities outside the home is persistently constrained by their responsibility for everyday tasks in the household division of labour. In addition, gender inequalities are still ingrained in the cultural, social and political systems of many countries.

Reaction at EU level: in order to tackle these many challenges, the Commission decided to react and propose a Programme of Action in an effort to close the gender gap in the developing world.

There are already several European and International initiatives in this area to progress towards greater gender equality (for example, in the framework of the European Consensus, the development cooperation Agreements with all geographical regions or even the Roadmap for Equality between Women and Men). On an operational level, most Member States and the European Commission have, hitherto, adopted a twin-track strategy, which comprises, on the one hand, the mainstreaming of gender equality in all policies, strategies and actions and, on the other, the financing of measures which directly support women's empowerment. However, the Commission aims to go further and proposes adapting this approach to the new aid modalities, to the requirements of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and on the 2005 Conference that it organised, in this context, on the theme “Owning Development: Promoting Gender Equality in New Aid Modalities and Partnerships”.

The present Communication builds on the outcome of that Conference, the policy framework of the European Consensus, and on the practical experience gained so far. It also responds to the commitments made in the Roadmap for Equality between Women and Men by formulating an EU strategy to progress towards achieving: (i) equal rights (political, civil, economic, employment, social and cultural) for women and men, girls and boys; (ii) equal access to, and control over, resources for women and men; (iii) equal opportunities to achieve political and economic influence for women and men.

An EU Strategy to Accelerate the Achievement of Gender Equality: according to the Commission, the new EU strategy must meet two objectives:

(a) to increase the efficiency of gender mainstreaming;

(b) to refocus specific actions for women's empowerment in our partner countries.

In order to reach these objectives, the cooperation strategies must act on three levels:

1. Political action: gender equality and women empowerment have to be brought to the table during the political dialogue with partner countries at the highest level;

2. Development cooperation: the key role of women in growth and development needs to be taken into account in the preparation and implementation of cooperation strategies; e.g. agricultural and food security strategies must clearly address the differing constraints faced by rural women, since in certain developing countries they are responsible for up to 80 % of basic food production; effective partnership, dialogue and consultation have to be established with relevant stakeholders (including governments, research centres, universities, civil society, international organisations) in the preparation of country strategies and aid programmes; mutual accountability mechanisms have to be put in place to improve the accountability role of different actors (government, regional economic communities, development agencies, civil society and media…) must be clarified; gender sensitive performance indicators have to be developed and used; budget support has to take into account Gender Equality concerns by linking the disbursement of incentive tranches to gender sensitive indicators;

3. Institutional capacity building: updated practical tools have to be developed in the assessment and implementation phases (26; improved access to information and best practices, and gender training for partner countries and staff have to be provided.

It is on this basis that the Commission proposes 41 actions listed in the annex of its Communication in the following broad areas:

· Governance (human rights, women's political empowerment, development of indicators, role of women in conflict and post conflict situations);

· Employment and economic activities (economic and social empowerment of women, employment, gender budget analysis, public finance management);

· Education (abolishing school fees, incentives to send girls to school, improving school environment, adult literacy);

· Health (social protection schemes, sexual and reproductive health and rights);

· Gender-based violence (legislation, victim protection, awareness raising through media, education and training).

These activities are examples to help to identify the proper programme mix for each specific country or region. The proper mix of activities will be decided case by case after a thorough analysis of each individual situation.

The set of identified actions will be implemented by the country programming of development aid (national and regional strategies of the DCI in particular) and via thematic programmes and other financial instruments (additional resources are available through multi-annual thematic programmes tabled by the Commission under the financial perspectives 2007-2013; the Thematic Programme “Investing in People” contains a financial envelope for funding EC actions in the area of promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women; actions will also be implemented to further raise awareness of gender inequality, to build the capacity of NGOs acting in this area and to strengthen the statistical capacity of governments). The funds available will be allocated through calls for proposals from eligible organisations and by direct agreements with selected partners.

Gender Equality will also be supported through the implementation of the Environment and Food Security thematic programmes, as well as under the new European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Instrument for Stability .

Lastly, the Commission will ensure the monitoring and follow-up of actions taken. It will organise in 2010 a second major international Conference on Gender Equality with the participation of all major stakeholders. Furthermore, a mid-term and a final evaluation of the implementation of this strategy will be undertaken by an external evaluator in 2010 and at the end of the 10th EDF cycle.

Conclusion: through enhanced political dialogue which incorporates gender equality as an explicit theme and which paves the way for the EU to engage actively with those civil society organisations for increased gender equality and specific, targeted actions to complement mainstreaming activities in each of the EU’s developing partner countries, the Commission aims to change cultural, social and political patterns and the distribution of political and economic power to further promote gender equality in developing countries.

Documents

Activities

Votes

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 7 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 353, +: 159, 0: 28
PL IE SK MT LV HU LU CY EE BG LT SI RO ES NL FI EL AT GB DK CZ PT BE IT SE FR DE
Total
48
10
11
3
8
16
3
2
5
13
8
6
27
38
22
12
10
11
43
12
20
20
20
33
14
46
79
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
198

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE-DE

3
icon: UEN UEN
29

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

4

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (2)

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
144

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

2

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 15 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 456, +: 72, 0: 22
CZ IE CY SI MT BG SK EE LU LV LT NL HU AT EL DK FI GB SE RO BE PT ES IT FR PL DE
Total
21
10
2
6
3
13
11
5
5
9
8
22
16
11
11
12
13
44
15
27
20
20
40
33
46
49
78
icon: NI NI
21

Czechia NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Slovakia NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (2)

4

Belgium NI

3
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (2)

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
30

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
207

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Bulgaria PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
3
icon: PSE PSE
143

Czechia PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 8 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 358, +: 154, 0: 23
PL IE MT SK LV HU CY LU LT SI BG EE NL FI RO EL IT GB AT ES PT DK BE CZ SE DE FR
Total
47
10
3
11
9
14
2
5
8
6
11
5
21
13
27
11
32
42
11
36
20
12
20
20
15
79
45
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
200

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

Against (1)

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
28

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Slovakia NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
142

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 9 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 353, +: 164, 0: 28
PL IE LV HU MT SK LU CY BG EE SI LT ES EL NL FI IT RO PT AT BE DK GB CZ SE DE FR
Total
49
10
9
17
3
11
5
2
13
5
5
7
40
11
22
12
33
27
21
11
18
12
44
20
15
79
44
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
206

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Finland PPE-DE

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

For (1)

4
icon: UEN UEN
29

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
18

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
14

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (2)

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
144

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 1 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 336, +: 167, 0: 27
PL IE CZ SK HU MT LV LU CY BG EE LT ES SI EL PT FI NL IT RO DK AT BE GB SE FR DE
Total
45
9
21
11
17
3
9
4
2
13
5
7
40
6
10
20
12
22
32
25
11
11
19
42
15
45
74
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
198

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (1)

4

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

5

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
28

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
142

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - ams. 2+14 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 330, +: 182, 0: 30
PL IE CZ SK HU MT LV EE CY BG LT ES LU RO SI EL NL IT PT FI AT DK GB BE SE DE FR
Total
44
10
20
11
17
3
9
4
2
13
8
40
5
27
6
11
22
33
21
13
11
12
42
19
15
78
46
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
204

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (1)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Finland PPE-DE

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
30

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
141

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 3 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 340, +: 167, 0: 36
PL CZ SK IE HU MT LV LU CY BG EE LT ES SI PT EL IT NL FI AT DK RO BE GB SE FR DE
Total
45
21
11
10
17
3
9
5
2
13
5
8
40
6
20
11
33
22
13
11
12
27
20
43
15
44
77
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
205

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

5

Finland PPE-DE

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
30

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
3
icon: PSE PSE
141

Czechia PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 4 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 349, +: 150, 0: 36
PL IE HU MT SK LV LU CY BG EE LT ES SI FI EL NL PT AT IT DK GB CZ BE RO SE DE FR
Total
44
9
17
3
11
9
5
2
13
5
8
39
6
13
11
22
20
11
31
12
40
20
20
27
15
78
44
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
202

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

4

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
27

Lithuania UEN

1

Italy UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
20

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
142

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 10 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 336, +: 176, 0: 25
PL IE CZ LV HU MT SK LU CY BG EE LT SI ES PT FI EL IT NL AT GB DK RO BE SE DE FR
Total
45
10
21
9
17
3
11
5
2
13
5
8
5
39
21
13
11
33
21
11
38
12
27
20
15
76
46
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
202

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland PPE-DE

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
29

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Czechia NI

1

Slovakia NI

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
141

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Finland PSE

3

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 5 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 345, +: 158, 0: 28
PL IE HU MT SK LV LU CY BG EE LT SI ES NL EL PT FI AT DK BE IT CZ GB RO SE DE FR
Total
46
10
17
3
9
9
5
2
13
5
8
5
39
22
11
21
13
11
12
19
32
19
38
27
14
75
46
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
198

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Finland PPE-DE

3

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: UEN UEN
29

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

2

Spain ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
138

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

Against (1)

1

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - am. 6 #

2008/03/13 Outcome: -: 336, +: 161, 0: 32
PL IE SK HU MT LV LU SI CY BG EE LT ES FI NL EL PT IT AT BE DK RO CZ GB SE DE FR
Total
45
10
11
16
3
9
5
5
2
13
5
8
39
11
22
11
21
32
11
18
12
27
20
38
15
75
45
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
199

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (2)

5

Malta PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: UEN UEN
29

Lithuania UEN

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
21

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Spain ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
137

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

Against (2)

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Rapport Uca A6-0035/2008 - résolution #

2008/03/13 Outcome: +: 347, -: 136, 0: 44
FR DE IT ES RO BE NL PT FI SE DK GB AT EL LT LV BG SI HU CZ IE CY EE LU SK MT PL
Total
45
75
32
40
24
20
21
20
12
15
12
38
11
11
8
9
11
6
16
21
10
2
4
4
11
3
46
icon: PSE PSE
135

Finland PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

2

Malta PSE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Spain ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

4

Austria ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2
2

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
31

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
30

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1

Latvia UEN

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: NI NI
20

Belgium NI

3

United Kingdom NI

3

Austria NI

1

Bulgaria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

2
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
197

Netherlands PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Austria PPE-DE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Latvia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria PPE-DE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland PPE-DE

Against (1)

5

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

Against (1)

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: UCA Feleknas date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.921&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-393921_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14661&j=1&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14661&j=0&l=en
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14661&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=14661&j=1&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0100/COM_COM(2007)0100_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0100/COM_COM(2007)0100_EN.pdf
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.921&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.921&secondRef=02
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.659
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE396.659
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.317
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE400.317
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0035_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0035_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2008-02-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0035_EN.html title: A6-0035/2008
events/3
date
2008-02-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0035_EN.html title: A6-0035/2008
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080313&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20080313&type=CRE
events/6
date
2008-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0103_EN.html title: T6-0103/2008
summary
events/6
date
2008-03-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0103_EN.html title: T6-0103/2008
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: UCA Feleknas date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2007-03-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: UCA Feleknas group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
rapporteur
name: CREȚU Gabriela date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2007-06-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CREȚU Gabriela group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-35&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0035_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
docs/6/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-35&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2008-0035_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-103
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2008-0103_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: UCA Feleknas body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: CREȚU Gabriela
  • date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: UCA Feleknas body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: CREȚU Gabriela type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-02-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-35&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0035/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14661&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080313&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-103 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0103/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2007-03-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: UCA Feleknas group: European United Left/Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2007-03-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Development (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: UCA Feleknas
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality
committee
FEMM
date
2007-06-26T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: CREȚU Gabriela group: Socialist Group in the European Parliament abbr: PSE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
FEMM
date
2007-06-26T00:00:00
committee_full
Women's Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: PSE name: CREȚU Gabriela
docs
  • date: 2007-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2007/0100/COM_COM(2007)0100_EN.pdf title: COM(2007)0100 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2007&nu_doc=100 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: to propose a Programme of Action to support gender equality in development cooperation. CONTENT: women are at the centre of sustainable social and economic development, poverty reduction and environmental protection in developing countries Despite this, gender inequality is part of the daily experience of a large proportion of the world’s women. Therefore, the role of women in employment and economic activities is often underestimated because most women work in the informal sectors, often with low productivity and incomes, poor working conditions, with little or no social protection. For example, in Africa women constitute 52% of the total population, while they produce and market 60 to 80% of food. The female labour force in sub-Saharan Africa in 2005 was about 73 million, representing 34% of those employed in the formal sector, earning only 10% of the income while owning 1%of the assets. Inequalities can also be seen in terms of decision-making with a very low rate of female representation in positions of power or even in terms of education (as an example, 57% of school age children outside of education are girls, while two thirds of illiterate people in the world are women). Moreover, the sexual and reproductive health of women remains precarious and many of the modest gains in women’s health made in recent decades are now threatened by the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Women are also the main victims of domestic violence and armed conflict. The ability of women and girls to empower themselves economically and socially by going to school or by engaging in productive and civic activities outside the home is persistently constrained by their responsibility for everyday tasks in the household division of labour. In addition, gender inequalities are still ingrained in the cultural, social and political systems of many countries. Reaction at EU level: in order to tackle these many challenges, the Commission decided to react and propose a Programme of Action in an effort to close the gender gap in the developing world. There are already several European and International initiatives in this area to progress towards greater gender equality (for example, in the framework of the European Consensus, the development cooperation Agreements with all geographical regions or even the Roadmap for Equality between Women and Men). On an operational level, most Member States and the European Commission have, hitherto, adopted a twin-track strategy, which comprises, on the one hand, the mainstreaming of gender equality in all policies, strategies and actions and, on the other, the financing of measures which directly support women's empowerment. However, the Commission aims to go further and proposes adapting this approach to the new aid modalities, to the requirements of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and on the 2005 Conference that it organised, in this context, on the theme “Owning Development: Promoting Gender Equality in New Aid Modalities and Partnerships”. The present Communication builds on the outcome of that Conference, the policy framework of the European Consensus, and on the practical experience gained so far. It also responds to the commitments made in the Roadmap for Equality between Women and Men by formulating an EU strategy to progress towards achieving: (i) equal rights (political, civil, economic, employment, social and cultural) for women and men, girls and boys; (ii) equal access to, and control over, resources for women and men; (iii) equal opportunities to achieve political and economic influence for women and men. An EU Strategy to Accelerate the Achievement of Gender Equality: according to the Commission, the new EU strategy must meet two objectives: (a) to increase the efficiency of gender mainstreaming; (b) to refocus specific actions for women's empowerment in our partner countries. In order to reach these objectives, the cooperation strategies must act on three levels: 1. Political action: gender equality and women empowerment have to be brought to the table during the political dialogue with partner countries at the highest level; 2. Development cooperation: the key role of women in growth and development needs to be taken into account in the preparation and implementation of cooperation strategies; e.g. agricultural and food security strategies must clearly address the differing constraints faced by rural women, since in certain developing countries they are responsible for up to 80 % of basic food production; effective partnership, dialogue and consultation have to be established with relevant stakeholders (including governments, research centres, universities, civil society, international organisations) in the preparation of country strategies and aid programmes; mutual accountability mechanisms have to be put in place to improve the accountability role of different actors (government, regional economic communities, development agencies, civil society and media…) must be clarified; gender sensitive performance indicators have to be developed and used; budget support has to take into account Gender Equality concerns by linking the disbursement of incentive tranches to gender sensitive indicators; 3. Institutional capacity building: updated practical tools have to be developed in the assessment and implementation phases (26; improved access to information and best practices, and gender training for partner countries and staff have to be provided. It is on this basis that the Commission proposes 41 actions listed in the annex of its Communication in the following broad areas: · Governance (human rights, women's political empowerment, development of indicators, role of women in conflict and post conflict situations); · Employment and economic activities (economic and social empowerment of women, employment, gender budget analysis, public finance management); · Education (abolishing school fees, incentives to send girls to school, improving school environment, adult literacy); · Health (social protection schemes, sexual and reproductive health and rights); · Gender-based violence (legislation, victim protection, awareness raising through media, education and training). These activities are examples to help to identify the proper programme mix for each specific country or region. The proper mix of activities will be decided case by case after a thorough analysis of each individual situation. The set of identified actions will be implemented by the country programming of development aid (national and regional strategies of the DCI in particular) and via thematic programmes and other financial instruments (additional resources are available through multi-annual thematic programmes tabled by the Commission under the financial perspectives 2007-2013; the Thematic Programme “Investing in People” contains a financial envelope for funding EC actions in the area of promoting gender equality and the empowerment of women; actions will also be implemented to further raise awareness of gender inequality, to build the capacity of NGOs acting in this area and to strengthen the statistical capacity of governments). The funds available will be allocated through calls for proposals from eligible organisations and by direct agreements with selected partners. Gender Equality will also be supported through the implementation of the Environment and Food Security thematic programmes, as well as under the new European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Instrument for Stability . Lastly, the Commission will ensure the monitoring and follow-up of actions taken. It will organise in 2010 a second major international Conference on Gender Equality with the participation of all major stakeholders. Furthermore, a mid-term and a final evaluation of the implementation of this strategy will be undertaken by an external evaluator in 2010 and at the end of the 10th EDF cycle. Conclusion: through enhanced political dialogue which incorporates gender equality as an explicit theme and which paves the way for the EU to engage actively with those civil society organisations for increased gender equality and specific, targeted actions to complement mainstreaming activities in each of the EU’s developing partner countries, the Commission aims to change cultural, social and political patterns and the distribution of political and economic power to further promote gender equality in developing countries. type: Document attached to the procedure body: EC
  • date: 2007-11-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE393.921&secondRef=02 title: PE393.921 committee: FEMM type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2007-11-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE396.659 title: PE396.659 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2008-01-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE400.317 title: PE400.317 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2008-02-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-35&language=EN title: A6-0035/2008 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2008-04-09T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14661&j=1&l=en title: SP(2008)2060 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2008-05-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14661&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)2630 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Development adopted the own-initiative report drawn up by Feleknas UCA (GUE/NGL, DE) in response to the Commission’s Communication entitled “Gender Equality and Women Empowerment in Development Cooperation” (COM(2007)0100). While welcoming, in theory, the Commission’s strategy, MEPs regret the fact that, since 1995, when the Council first declared consideration of the gender perspective in development cooperation to be a principle underpinning the development policy of the Community, not enough has been done in practice. Members also regret the fact that most Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Country Strategy Papers refer to gender as a cross-cutting area. They call for gender-specific targets and activities to be included in future strategies. The Commission and Member States are called upon to take action in development cooperation with concrete and measurable effects on gender relations (amending laws, institutions and existing patriarchal patterns, increasing budgetary resources and improving social and economic conditions for women). On a general note, MEPs call on the Commission to undertake a gender analysis at every stage of policy design, implementation and evaluation so as to ensure that all forms of gender-based discrimination are eliminated and so as to protect and promote women’s human rights. In particular, the Commission is urged, when drawing up development cooperation policies, to support measures to strengthen the legal status of women, further promoting equal access to decent work as well as fundamental human and social rights, and paying particular attention to the increasing number of migrant women and their increasing vulnerability, so that women do not become the new exploited class of society. The report welcomes programmes addressing female victims of violence but criticises strongly the fact that measures to combat violence against women are not part of the Commission’s strategy. Members condemn any legal, cultural or religious practices that discriminate against women, exclude them from political and public life and segregate them in their daily lives, as well as those that condone genital mutation, rape, domestic violence, forced marriage, honour killings, any obligation against the woman's own will to observe specific dress codes, and harassment for not conforming to gender-related norms or rules. The Commission and Member States are urged to combat these practices in development cooperation policies. Recalling that in sub-Saharan Africa, 57 per cent of adults with HIV are women, the report invites the Commission and the Member States to develop specific, time-bound and measurable commitments ― backed by the allocation of adequate resources ― to achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support for all women and girls by 2010. MEPs also call on the Commission to strengthen its political leadership role in health policies, addressing currently neglected women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) issues. In order to promote the development of local communities, the Commission is called upon to develop policies that encourage women to form self help groups and set up on their own and, in collaboration with international organisations (such as Finance PlaNet), to expand the microfinance network so that more women can take out loans in order to improve their economic status. The report stresses the need to further promote access to education and vocational training at all levels for girls and to support education policies that are equitable and of a high standard, by providing teachers with training in gender issues and supporting reform of the curriculum to include gender equality, sexual and reproductive health and women's empowerment issues. Lastly, Members emphasise the importance of encouraging donor coordination for gender mainstreaming and, improving dialogue and communication to achieve a common understanding of gender concepts and appropriate methodology.
  • date: 2008-02-11T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-35&language=EN title: A6-0035/2008
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14661&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080313&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-103 title: T6-0103/2008 summary: The European Parliament adopted, by 347 votes to 136 with 44 abstentions, a resolution on Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment in Development Cooperation in response to the Commission Communication on the subject. The own-initiative report had been tabled for consideration in plenary by Feleknas UCA (GUE/NGL, DE) on behalf of the Development Committee. While welcoming, in theory, the Commission’s strategy, MEPs deplore the fact that, since 1995, when the Council first declared consideration of the gender perspective in development cooperation to be a principle underpinning the development policy of the Community, not enough has been done in practice. Members also regret the fact that most Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Country Strategy Papers refer to gender as a cross-cutting area. They call for gender-specific targets and activities to be included in future strategies. Parliament regrets that only 5% of the DCI funds for the thematic programme 'Investing in People' (2007-2013) are allocated to gender equality and that regional and country strategy papers do not give an overview of budget allocation to gender equality since gender is only mentioned as a cross-cutting issue and thus no financial details are provided. The Commission and Member States are called upon to take action in development cooperation with concrete and measurable effects on gender relations (amending laws, institutions and existing patriarchal patterns, increasing budgetary resources and improving social and economic conditions for women). On a general note, MEPs call on the Commission to undertake a gender analysis at every stage of policy design, implementation and evaluation so as to ensure that all forms of gender-based discrimination are eliminated and so as to protect and promote women’s human rights. In particular, the Commission is urged, when drawing up development cooperation policies, to support measures to strengthen the legal status of women, further promoting equal access to decent work as well as fundamental human and social rights, and paying particular attention to the increasing number of migrant women and their increasing vulnerability, so that women do not become the new exploited class of society. Parliament also calls on the Commission to evaluate the potential effect of Economic Partnership Agreements from the gender perspective. Parliament welcomes programmes addressing female victims of violence but criticises strongly the fact that measures to combat violence against women are not part of the Commission’s strategy. Members condemn any legal, cultural or religious practices that discriminate against women, exclude them from political and public life and segregate them in their daily lives, as well as those that condone genital mutation, rape, domestic violence, forced marriage, honour killings, any obligation against the woman's own will to observe specific dress codes, harassment for not conforming to gender-related norms or rules, trafficking and forced labour. The Commission and Member States are urged to combat these practices in development cooperation policies. Parliament deplores in the strongest possible terms the virtual chattel status of women trapped under Sharia law, and regards this oppression as representing the diametric opposite of every principle which Parliament holds to be of paramount importance. Recalling that in sub-Saharan Africa, 57 per cent of adults with HIV are women, Parliament invites the Commission and the Member States to develop specific, time-bound and measurable commitments ― backed by the allocation of adequate resources ― to achieve universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support for all women and girls by 2010. MEPs also call on the Commission to strengthen its political leadership role in health policies, addressing currently neglected women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) issues. They emphasises the importance of putting women at the centre of water supply, sanitation and hygiene and emphasises, therefore, the importance of increasing access to safe drinking water, adequate sanitation and water for productive uses; In order to promote the development of local communities, the Commission is called upon to develop policies that encourage women to form self help groups and set up on their own and, in collaboration with international organisations (such as Finance PlaNet), to expand the microfinance network so that more women can take out loans in order to improve their economic status. Parliament points out that the ability of women to influence the development of their own lives is contingent on their education. It stresses the need to further promote access to education and vocational training at all levels for girls and to support education policies that are equitable and of a high standard, by providing teachers with training in gender issues and supporting reform of the curriculum to include gender equality, sexual and reproductive health and women's empowerment issues. Lastly, Members emphasise the importance of encouraging donor coordination for gender mainstreaming and, improving dialogue and communication to achieve a common understanding of gender concepts and appropriate methodology.
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/6/53436
New
  • DEVE/6/53436
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.10.04 Gender equality
  • 4.10.09 Women condition and rights
  • 6.30 Development cooperation
New
4.10.04
Gender equality
4.10.09
Women condition and rights
6.30
Development cooperation
activities/0/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
CREŢU Gabriela
New
CREȚU Gabriela
activities/1/committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
CREŢU Gabriela
New
CREȚU Gabriela
committees/1/rapporteur/0/name
Old
CREŢU Gabriela
New
CREȚU Gabriela
activities
  • date: 2007-09-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: UCA Feleknas body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: CREŢU Gabriela
  • date: 2008-01-29T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: UCA Feleknas body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: CREŢU Gabriela type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2008-02-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2008-35&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A6-0035/2008 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2008-03-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14661&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20080313&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2008-103 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0103/2008 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2007-03-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Development (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: UCA Feleknas
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: FEMM date: 2007-06-26T00:00:00 committee_full: Women's Rights and Gender Equality (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: PSE name: CREŢU Gabriela
links
other
  • body: EC dg: Development commissioner: MICHEL Louis
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/6/53436
reference
2007/2182(INI)
title
Gender equality and women empowerment in development cooperation
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject