BETA


2007/2577(RSP) Resolution on the posting of workers

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 128-p5

Events

2007/09/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/08/29
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2007/07/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2007/07/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

Following the debate which took place during the sitting of 10 July 2007 on the oral question O-0041/2007 tabled by Jan ANDERSSON , on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs to the Commission, on the posting of workers (see COD/1991/0346 for summaries of the follow up documents), the European Parliament adopted the resolution on the Commission Communication on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services: maximising its benefits and potential while guaranteeing the protection of workers.

The Parliament states that full implementation of Directive 96/71/EC is paramount for achieving the correct balance between the freedom to provide services and worker protection, in particular against social dumping. It is convinced that in its guidance and legal interpretation, the Commission goes in some cases beyond what has been established by the case law of the European Court of Justice.

The Commission is called upon to fully take into account the variety of labour market models existing in the European Union when it comes to adopting any measure on posting and to respect that some Member States require the availability of a mandated representative with legal capacity in the host country in order to properly implement and monitor the Directive. This could be any person that has been provided with a clear mandate from the company (including a worker).

The report states that the Commission should be more precise when providing guidance to the Member States on control measures acceptable under the Directive to protect posted workers. Checks and controls carried out by host Member States under the Directive, notably the obligation to keep certain documents in the host country, must be seen as an important tool to guarantee the protection of the rights of posted workers; considers, however, that these measures should be strictly proportional and not constitute hidden obstacles to exercising the right of free movement.

The Parliament points out that existing case-law recognises the right of the host Member State to require certain documents to verify compliance with the employment conditions laid down in the Directive.

The Commission is invited to find the right mix of guidance measures addressed to both companies and Member States so that they have a better understanding of what they are allowed to do under the Directive and relevant case-law. In addition, the Commission is requested to support close cooperation between inspection bodies in the Member States by providing a permanent European platform for cross-border cooperation. MEPs welcome in this respect the future setting-up by the Commission of a high-level group in order to support and assist the Member States in identifying and exchanging good practices and to formally involve social partners on a regular basis.

They take the view that it would be appropriate for the social partners in those Member States where the Directive is implemented through collective agreements to gain direct access to information about the posting companies, so that they can exercise the supervision which in other Member States is subject to authorities that have such access to company information.

Lastly, the Parliament supports the Commission conclusion to the effect that the host Member State should be able to require a prior declaration by the service provider to enable it to verify compliance with the employment conditions.

Documents
2007/07/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2007/07/10
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2007/07/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

O-0041/2007

Subject: Posting of workers

Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services set 16 December 1999 as the deadline for transposition of its provisions into national law. Soon, appropriate implementation of the Directive proved to be problematic due both to insufficiencies inherent in the text and the lack of proper implementation in the Member States and coordination among their competent authorities. The reviews of the Directive by the Commission in 2003 and 2006 were considered insufficient by the European Parliament.

In its Communications 'Guidance on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services' and 'Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services: maximising its benefits and potential while guaranteeing the protection of workers', the Commission committed itself to take the necessary steps to rectify the situation created by any lack of compliance with the relevant provisions of Community law and/or cooperation between Member States under Articles 4 (cooperation on information) and 5 (enforcement measures by Member States) of the Directive.

How does the Commission intend to address the concerns expressed by the European Parliament in its resolutions, in particular with regard to:

the keeping of documents at the workplace to control compliance with the Directive, and the presence of a posting company legal representative in order to fulfil legal requirements in the host Member State?

In view of the fact that the Directive applies at least from December 1999 and that guidelines explaining to Member States their obligations with regard to postings that take place on their territory were published by the Commission more than one year ago:

Will the Commission publish clearer, more detailed, guidelines to help Member States and companies to have a better understanding of what they are allowed to do under the Directive and the relevant case-law? If so, when? Has the Commission assessed which Member States still fail to comply with the provisions of the Directive, in particular concerning cooperation on information and enforcement measures by Member States?

Can the Commission confirm that, in the framework of posting, it will respect all labour market models existing in the European Union?

------------------

The motion for a resolution winding up this debate was due to be put to the vote on 11 July 2007.

2007/07/09
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

B6/0266/2007 - Détachement de travailleurs - am. 5 #

2007/07/11 Outcome: -: 433, +: 114, 0: 3
CY EL SI BE LU CZ MT DK BG LV EE FI SK IE SE AT LT PT NL HU IT RO ES DE FR GB PL
Total
5
16
2
15
3
20
4
9
11
7
6
13
9
11
15
16
10
20
23
18
47
32
33
67
54
44
40
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
26

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

France Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

2
icon: ITS ITS
10
2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
12

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
2
icon: UEN UEN
21

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
201

Cyprus PPE-DE

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria PPE-DE

3

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
4

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
157

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Malta PSE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PSE

2

Bulgaria PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Finland PSE

2

Slovakia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

B6/0266/2007 - Détachement de travailleurs - am. 7 #

2007/07/11 Outcome: -: 488, +: 80, 0: 4
CY SI MT DK LU LV EE IE BE SE BG SK CZ FI AT LT EL PT NL HU RO ES IT DE PL GB FR
Total
5
3
3
10
4
7
6
10
16
15
15
9
22
14
16
10
19
19
26
20
34
29
48
69
41
46
56
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

2
icon: ITS ITS
13

Belgium ITS

For (1)

1
2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1
2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

France IND/DEM

2
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
83

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PSE PSE
165

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Malta PSE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

Finland PSE

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

B6/0266/2007 - Détachement de travailleurs - am. 8 #

2007/07/11 Outcome: -: 316, +: 252, 0: 3
RO PT ES EL BE FR DK AT EE DE NL SE BG CY MT SI LU SK IE FI LV CZ HU LT IT GB PL
Total
32
20
28
19
17
56
10
16
6
69
26
15
15
5
3
3
4
9
10
14
7
22
20
10
48
46
41
icon: PSE PSE
166

Estonia PSE

3

Malta PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
13

Belgium ITS

2
2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Greece IND/DEM

1

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
2
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
81
2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

B6/0266/2007 - Détachement de travailleurs - par. 8 #

2007/07/11 Outcome: +: 375, -: 190, 0: 6
FR NL DE RO BE EL AT PT ES DK BG FI SE GB LT EE IT LV SI CY MT LU IE PL SK HU CZ
Total
54
26
71
34
17
19
16
20
28
10
15
12
15
46
10
6
47
7
3
5
5
4
9
41
9
20
22
icon: PSE PSE
168

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
82

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
29

France Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: ITS ITS
14

Belgium ITS

2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
11

France IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Abstain (2)

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

Against (1)

2

Ireland UEN

For (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Belgium PPE-DE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

2

B6/0266/2007 - Détachement de travailleurs - am. 9 #

2007/07/11 Outcome: -: 317, 0: 159, +: 93
EL AT CY PT LU DK BE EE MT NL SI BG IE FI SE LV SK CZ ES LT RO HU DE IT FR GB PL
Total
19
16
5
20
4
9
15
6
5
26
3
15
10
14
15
7
9
22
28
10
32
21
70
45
57
45
41
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
32

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Italy Verts/ALE

1

France Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
10
2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
168

Luxembourg PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark PSE

2

Estonia PSE

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland PSE

Abstain (1)

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Greece IND/DEM

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (2)

2

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1

Italy NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
2
icon: UEN UEN
19

Denmark UEN

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

1

Latvia UEN

2

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
83

Austria ALDE

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1
2

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
207

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

B6/0266/2007 - Détachement de travailleurs - am. 4 #

2007/07/11 Outcome: -: 449, +: 120, 0: 4
AT CY NL LU SI PT LV MT IE EL DK EE SE FI BE BG SK CZ LT FR RO HU ES IT DE PL GB
Total
16
5
26
4
3
20
7
5
10
18
10
6
15
14
16
15
9
22
10
56
33
21
28
47
70
41
46
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
30

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ITS ITS
13

Belgium ITS

For (1)

1
2

United Kingdom ITS

Against (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
13

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (2)

2
icon: NI NI
7

Austria NI

1
2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
19

Latvia UEN

2

Ireland UEN

Against (1)

1

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
83

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary ALDE

2
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
208

Cyprus PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE-DE

3

Lithuania PPE-DE

Against (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
167

Luxembourg PSE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PSE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Finland PSE

3

Slovakia PSE

3

Czechia PSE

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13857&j=1&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13857&j=0&l=en
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13857&j=0&l=en
New
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=13857&j=1&l=en
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0132_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0132_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0266_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0266_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070710&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20070710&type=CRE
events/2
date
2007-07-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0340_EN.html title: T6-0340/2007
summary
events/2
date
2007-07-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0340_EN.html title: T6-0340/2007
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-132&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0132_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-266&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0266_EN.html
docs/2/body
EC
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-340
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0340_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070710&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2007-07-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13857&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-340 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0340/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: ŠPIDLA Vladimír
committees
    docs
    • date: 2007-07-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-132&language=EN title: B6-0132/2007 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-266&language=EN title: B6-0266/2007 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2007-08-29T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13857&j=1&l=en title: SP(2007)4170 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    • date: 2007-09-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=13857&j=0&l=en title: SP(2007)4733 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070710&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: O-0041/2007 Subject: Posting of workers Directive 96/71/EC concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services set 16 December 1999 as the deadline for transposition of its provisions into national law. Soon, appropriate implementation of the Directive proved to be problematic due both to insufficiencies inherent in the text and the lack of proper implementation in the Member States and coordination among their competent authorities. The reviews of the Directive by the Commission in 2003 and 2006 were considered insufficient by the European Parliament. In its Communications 'Guidance on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services' and 'Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services: maximising its benefits and potential while guaranteeing the protection of workers', the Commission committed itself to take the necessary steps to rectify the situation created by any lack of compliance with the relevant provisions of Community law and/or cooperation between Member States under Articles 4 (cooperation on information) and 5 (enforcement measures by Member States) of the Directive. How does the Commission intend to address the concerns expressed by the European Parliament in its resolutions, in particular with regard to: the keeping of documents at the workplace to control compliance with the Directive, and the presence of a posting company legal representative in order to fulfil legal requirements in the host Member State? In view of the fact that the Directive applies at least from December 1999 and that guidelines explaining to Member States their obligations with regard to postings that take place on their territory were published by the Commission more than one year ago: Will the Commission publish clearer, more detailed, guidelines to help Member States and companies to have a better understanding of what they are allowed to do under the Directive and the relevant case-law? If so, when? Has the Commission assessed which Member States still fail to comply with the provisions of the Directive, in particular concerning cooperation on information and enforcement measures by Member States? Can the Commission confirm that, in the framework of posting, it will respect all labour market models existing in the European Union? ------------------ The motion for a resolution winding up this debate was due to be put to the vote on 11 July 2007.
    • date: 2007-07-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13857&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2007-07-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-340 title: T6-0340/2007 summary: Following the debate which took place during the sitting of 10 July 2007 on the oral question O-0041/2007 tabled by Jan ANDERSSON , on behalf of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs to the Commission, on the posting of workers (see COD/1991/0346 for summaries of the follow up documents), the European Parliament adopted the resolution on the Commission Communication on the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services: maximising its benefits and potential while guaranteeing the protection of workers. The Parliament states that full implementation of Directive 96/71/EC is paramount for achieving the correct balance between the freedom to provide services and worker protection, in particular against social dumping. It is convinced that in its guidance and legal interpretation, the Commission goes in some cases beyond what has been established by the case law of the European Court of Justice. The Commission is called upon to fully take into account the variety of labour market models existing in the European Union when it comes to adopting any measure on posting and to respect that some Member States require the availability of a mandated representative with legal capacity in the host country in order to properly implement and monitor the Directive. This could be any person that has been provided with a clear mandate from the company (including a worker). The report states that the Commission should be more precise when providing guidance to the Member States on control measures acceptable under the Directive to protect posted workers. Checks and controls carried out by host Member States under the Directive, notably the obligation to keep certain documents in the host country, must be seen as an important tool to guarantee the protection of the rights of posted workers; considers, however, that these measures should be strictly proportional and not constitute hidden obstacles to exercising the right of free movement. The Parliament points out that existing case-law recognises the right of the host Member State to require certain documents to verify compliance with the employment conditions laid down in the Directive. The Commission is invited to find the right mix of guidance measures addressed to both companies and Member States so that they have a better understanding of what they are allowed to do under the Directive and relevant case-law. In addition, the Commission is requested to support close cooperation between inspection bodies in the Member States by providing a permanent European platform for cross-border cooperation. MEPs welcome in this respect the future setting-up by the Commission of a high-level group in order to support and assist the Member States in identifying and exchanging good practices and to formally involve social partners on a regular basis. They take the view that it would be appropriate for the social partners in those Member States where the Directive is implemented through collective agreements to gain direct access to information about the posting companies, so that they can exercise the supervision which in other Member States is subject to authorities that have such access to company information. Lastly, the Parliament supports the Commission conclusion to the effect that the host Member State should be able to require a prior declaration by the service provider to enable it to verify compliance with the employment conditions.
    • date: 2007-07-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: ŠPIDLA Vladimír
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 2.20 Free movement of persons
    • 4.15.04 Workforce, occupational mobility, job conversion, working conditions
    New
    2.20
    Free movement of persons
    4.15.04
    Workforce, occupational mobility, job conversion, working conditions
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    New
    Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
    activities
    • date: 2007-07-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20070710&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2007-07-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=13857&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-340 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0340/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
      links
      other
      • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/social/ title: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion commissioner: ŠPIDLA Vladimír
      procedure
      reference
      2007/2577(RSP)
      title
      Resolution on the posting of workers
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Debate or resolution on oral questions
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject