2007/2682(RSP) | [ParlTrack]

download json

2007/2682(RSP) Resolution on Justice for the 'Comfort Women'

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:

RoP 135

Subjects

6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general

Events

2008/01/23

EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary

Documents

SP(2008)0411

2007/12/13

EP - Results of vote in Parliament

Documents

Results of vote in Parliament

2007/12/13

EP - Debate in Parliament

Details

The debate was followed by a vote on a motion for a resolution.

Documents

Debate in Parliament

2007/12/13

EP - Decision by Parliament

Details

Following the debate held in plenary, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on Justice for the 'Comfort Women' (sex slaves in Asia before and during World War II). The resolution was adopted by 54 votes in favour, none against and 3 abstentions. Welcoming the excellent relationship between the EU and Japan, Parliament expressed its solidarity with the women who were victims of the "comfort women" system for the duration of World War II. It recalled that the government of Japan, during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II, officially ordered the acquisition of young women, who became known to the world as ianfu or "comfort women", for the sole purpose of sexual servitude to its Imperial Armed Forces. The "comfort women" system included gang rape, forced abortions, humiliation, and sexual violence resulting in mutilation, death or eventual suicide, in one of the largest cases of human trafficking in the 20th century.

Parliament welcomed the statements by Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono in 1993 and by the then Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995 on the "comfort women", as well as the resolutions of the Japanese parliament (the Diet) of 1995 and 2005 expressing apologies for wartime victims, including victims of the "comfort women" system. It also welcomed the Japanese Government's initiative to establish, in 1995, the now-dissolved Asian Women's Fund, a largely government-funded private foundation, which distributed some "atonement money" to several hundred "comfort women". However, Parliament considered that this humanitarian initiative could not satisfy the victims’ claims of legal recognition and reparation under public international law, as stated by the UN Special Rapporteur Gay McDougall in her report of 1998.

Parliament pointed out that the dozens of "comfort women" cases brought before Japanese courts had all ended in the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for compensation, despite court judgments acknowledging the Imperial Armed Forces" direct and indirect involvement, and the State's responsibility.

It called on the Japanese Government :

- formally to acknowledge, apologise, and accept historical and legal responsibility, in a clear and unequivocal manner, for its Imperial Armed Forces' coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as "comfort women", during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II ;

- to implement effective administrative mechanisms to provide reparations to all surviving victims of the "comfort women" system and the families of its deceased victims ;

- to refute publicly any claims that the subjugation and enslavement of "comfort women" never occurred.

The Japanese parliament (the Diet) was asked to take legal measures to remove existing obstacles to obtaining reparations before Japanese courts. In particular, the right of individuals to claim reparations from the government should be expressly recognised in national law, and cases for reparations for the survivors of sexual slavery, as a crime under international law, should be prioritised, taking into account the age of the survivors.

Lastly, Parliament encouraged the Japanese people and government to take further steps to recognise the full history of their nation, as is the moral duty of all countries, and to foster awareness in Japan of its actions in the 1930s and 1940s, including in relation to "comfort women". The government of Japan must educate current and future generations about those events.

Documents

T6-0632/2007

2007/12/13

EP - End of procedure in Parliament

2007/12/11

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0525/2007

2007/12/11

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0528/2007

2007/12/11

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0531/2007

2007/12/11

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0538/2007

2007/12/11

EP - Motion for a resolution

Documents

B6-0542/2007

2007/12/11

Joint motion for resolution

Documents

RC-B6-0525/2007

Documents

Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)0411
Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
Decision by Parliament: T6-0632/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0525/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0528/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0531/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0538/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0542/2007
Joint motion for resolution: RC-B6-0525/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0525/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0528/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0531/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0538/2007
Motion for a resolution: B6-0542/2007
Joint motion for resolution: RC-B6-0525/2007
Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2008)0411

Activities

Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
- 2016/11/22 Comfort women (vote)
Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
Marios MATSAKIS
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
- 2016/11/22 Comfort women (vote)
Urszula KRUPA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
Marcin LIBICKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
Karin SCHEELE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
Eva-Britt SVENSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Justice for the "Comfort Women"
Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Comfort women (vote)

Votes

RC B6-0525/2007 - Justice pour les femmes de réconfort - résolution #

2007/12/13 Outcome: +: 54, 0: 3

		DE	PL	IT	GB	FR	EL	ES	LT	SK	AT	NL	CY	EE	SE	CZ	PT
	Total	10	11	6	7	4	4	3	2	2	2	1	1	1	1	1	1
PPE-DE	33	Germany PPE-DE For (9) Albert DESS, Bernd POSSELT, Daniel CASPARY, Elisabeth JEGGLE, Hans-Peter MAYER, Michael GAHLER, Rainer WIELAND, Thomas MANN, Werner LANGEN 9	Poland PPE-DE For (3) Czesław Adam SIEKIERSKI, Filip KACZMAREK, Zbigniew ZALESKI 3	Italy PPE-DE For (5) Carlo CASINI, Carlo FATUZZO, Gabriele ALBERTINI, Giuseppe CASTIGLIONE, Mario MAURO 5	United Kingdom PPE-DE For (6) Giles CHICHESTER, John BOWIS, John PURVIS, Richard ASHWORTH, Robert STURDY, Timothy Charles Ayrton TANNOCK Abstain (1) Nirj DEVA 7	France PPE-DE For (2) Françoise GROSSETÊTE, Joseph DAUL 2	Greece PPE-DE For (3) Antonios TRAKATELLIS, Manolis MAVROMMATIS, Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU 3		Lithuania PPE-DE For (1) Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ 1	Slovakia PPE-DE For (2) Anna ZÁBORSKÁ, Zita PLEŠTINSKÁ 2						Czechia PPE-DE For (1) Zuzana ROITHOVÁ 1
PSE	8		Poland PSE For (1) Lidia Joanna GERINGER DE OEDENBERG 1				Greece PSE For (1) Costas BOTOPOULOS 1	Spain PSE For (2) Inés AYALA SENDER, Manuel MEDINA ORTEGA 2	Lithuania PSE For (1) Aloyzas SAKALAS 1		Austria PSE For (2) Jörg LEICHTFRIED, Karin SCHEELE 2						Portugal PSE For (1) Paulo CASACA 1
UEN	6		Poland UEN For (5) Ewa TOMASZEWSKA, Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, Leopold Józef RUTOWICZ, Marcin LIBICKI, Wiesław Stefan KUC 5	Italy UEN For (1) Francesco Enrico SPERONI 1
ALDE	3											Netherlands ALDE For (1) Sophia IN 'T VELD 1	Cyprus ALDE For (1) Marios MATSAKIS 1	Estonia ALDE For (1) Toomas SAVI 1
Verts/ALE	3					France Verts/ALE For (2) Gérard ONESTA, Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN 2		Spain Verts/ALE For (1) Raül ROMEVA i RUEDA 1
GUE/NGL	2	Germany GUE/NGL For (1) Tobias PFLÜGER 1													Sweden GUE/NGL For (1) Eva-Britt SVENSSON 1
IND/DEM	2		Poland IND/DEM Abstain (2) Urszula KRUPA, Witold TOMCZAK 2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2021-12-18Show (9) Changes | Timetravel

docs/0/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0525_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0525_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0528_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0528_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0531_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0531_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0538_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0538_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0542_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0542_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2007-0525_EN.html New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2007-0525_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071213&type=CRE New https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20071213&type=CRE
events/2	date 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type Decision by Parliament body EP docs url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0632_EN.html title: T6-0632/2007 summary Following the debate held in plenary, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on Justice for the 'Comfort Women' (sex slaves in Asia before and during World War II). The resolution was adopted by 54 votes in favour, none against and 3 abstentions. Welcoming the excellent relationship between the EU and Japan, Parliament expressed its solidarity with the women who were victims of the "comfort women" system for the duration of World War II. It recalled that the government of Japan, during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II, officially ordered the acquisition of young women, who became known to the world as ianfu or "comfort women", for the sole purpose of sexual servitude to its Imperial Armed Forces. The "comfort women" system included gang rape, forced abortions, humiliation, and sexual violence resulting in mutilation, death or eventual suicide, in one of the largest cases of human trafficking in the 20th century. Parliament welcomed the statements by Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono in 1993 and by the then Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995 on the "comfort women", as well as the resolutions of the Japanese parliament (the Diet) of 1995 and 2005 expressing apologies for wartime victims, including victims of the "comfort women" system. It also welcomed the Japanese Government's initiative to establish, in 1995, the now-dissolved Asian Women's Fund, a largely government-funded private foundation, which distributed some "atonement money" to several hundred "comfort women". However, Parliament considered that this humanitarian initiative could not satisfy the victims’ claims of legal recognition and reparation under public international law, as stated by the UN Special Rapporteur Gay McDougall in her report of 1998. Parliament pointed out that the dozens of "comfort women" cases brought before Japanese courts had all ended in the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for compensation, despite court judgments acknowledging the Imperial Armed Forces" direct and indirect involvement, and the State's responsibility. It called on the Japanese Government : - formally to acknowledge, apologise, and accept historical and legal responsibility, in a clear and unequivocal manner, for its Imperial Armed Forces' coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as "comfort women", during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II ; - to implement effective administrative mechanisms to provide reparations to all surviving victims of the "comfort women" system and the families of its deceased victims ; - to refute publicly any claims that the subjugation and enslavement of "comfort women" never occurred. The Japanese parliament (the Diet) was asked to take legal measures to remove existing obstacles to obtaining reparations before Japanese courts. In particular, the right of individuals to claim reparations from the government should be expressly recognised in national law, and cases for reparations for the survivors of sexual slavery, as a crime under international law, should be prioritised, taking into account the age of the survivors. Lastly, Parliament encouraged the Japanese people and government to take further steps to recognise the full history of their nation, as is the moral duty of all countries, and to foster awareness in Japan of its actions in the 1930s and 1940s, including in relation to "comfort women". The government of Japan must educate current and future generations about those events.
events/2	date 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body EP docs url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0632_EN.html title: T6-0632/2007 summary Following the debate held in plenary, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on Justice for the 'Comfort Women' (sex slaves in Asia before and during World War II). The resolution was adopted by 54 votes in favour, none against and 3 abstentions. Welcoming the excellent relationship between the EU and Japan, Parliament expressed its solidarity with the women who were victims of the "comfort women" system for the duration of World War II. It recalled that the government of Japan, during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II, officially ordered the acquisition of young women, who became known to the world as ianfu or "comfort women", for the sole purpose of sexual servitude to its Imperial Armed Forces. The "comfort women" system included gang rape, forced abortions, humiliation, and sexual violence resulting in mutilation, death or eventual suicide, in one of the largest cases of human trafficking in the 20th century. Parliament welcomed the statements by Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono in 1993 and by the then Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995 on the "comfort women", as well as the resolutions of the Japanese parliament (the Diet) of 1995 and 2005 expressing apologies for wartime victims, including victims of the "comfort women" system. It also welcomed the Japanese Government's initiative to establish, in 1995, the now-dissolved Asian Women's Fund, a largely government-funded private foundation, which distributed some "atonement money" to several hundred "comfort women". However, Parliament considered that this humanitarian initiative could not satisfy the victims’ claims of legal recognition and reparation under public international law, as stated by the UN Special Rapporteur Gay McDougall in her report of 1998. Parliament pointed out that the dozens of "comfort women" cases brought before Japanese courts had all ended in the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for compensation, despite court judgments acknowledging the Imperial Armed Forces" direct and indirect involvement, and the State's responsibility. It called on the Japanese Government : - formally to acknowledge, apologise, and accept historical and legal responsibility, in a clear and unequivocal manner, for its Imperial Armed Forces' coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as "comfort women", during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II ; - to implement effective administrative mechanisms to provide reparations to all surviving victims of the "comfort women" system and the families of its deceased victims ; - to refute publicly any claims that the subjugation and enslavement of "comfort women" never occurred. The Japanese parliament (the Diet) was asked to take legal measures to remove existing obstacles to obtaining reparations before Japanese courts. In particular, the right of individuals to claim reparations from the government should be expressly recognised in national law, and cases for reparations for the survivors of sexual slavery, as a crime under international law, should be prioritised, taking into account the age of the survivors. Lastly, Parliament encouraged the Japanese people and government to take further steps to recognise the full history of their nation, as is the moral duty of all countries, and to foster awareness in Japan of its actions in the 1930s and 1940s, including in relation to "comfort women". The government of Japan must educate current and future generations about those events.

2020-01-19Show (8) Changes | Timetravel

docs/0/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-525&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0525_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-528&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0528_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-531&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0531_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-538&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0538_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-542&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2007-0542_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P6-RC-2007-525&language=EN New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-6-2007-0525_EN.html
docs/6/body	EC
events/2/docs/0/url	Old http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-632 New http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2007-0632_EN.html

2019-07-06Show (9) Changes | Timetravel

activities	date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14529&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-632 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0632/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
docs	date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-525&language=EN title: B6-0525/2007 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-528&language=EN title: B6-0528/2007 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-531&language=EN title: B6-0531/2007 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-538&language=EN title: B6-0538/2007 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2007-542&language=EN title: B6-0542/2007 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP date: 2007-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P6-RC-2007-525&language=EN title: RC-B6-0525/2007 type: Joint motion for resolution date: 2008-01-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=14529&j=0&l=en title: SP(2008)0411 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events	date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14529&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071213&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: The debate was followed by a vote on a motion for a resolution. date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-632 title: T6-0632/2007 summary: Following the debate held in plenary, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on Justice for the 'Comfort Women' (sex slaves in Asia before and during World War II). The resolution was adopted by 54 votes in favour, none against and 3 abstentions. Welcoming the excellent relationship between the EU and Japan, Parliament expressed its solidarity with the women who were victims of the "comfort women" system for the duration of World War II. It recalled that the government of Japan, during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II, officially ordered the acquisition of young women, who became known to the world as ianfu or "comfort women", for the sole purpose of sexual servitude to its Imperial Armed Forces. The "comfort women" system included gang rape, forced abortions, humiliation, and sexual violence resulting in mutilation, death or eventual suicide, in one of the largest cases of human trafficking in the 20th century. Parliament welcomed the statements by Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono in 1993 and by the then Prime Minister Tomiichi Murayama in 1995 on the "comfort women", as well as the resolutions of the Japanese parliament (the Diet) of 1995 and 2005 expressing apologies for wartime victims, including victims of the "comfort women" system. It also welcomed the Japanese Government's initiative to establish, in 1995, the now-dissolved Asian Women's Fund, a largely government-funded private foundation, which distributed some "atonement money" to several hundred "comfort women". However, Parliament considered that this humanitarian initiative could not satisfy the victims’ claims of legal recognition and reparation under public international law, as stated by the UN Special Rapporteur Gay McDougall in her report of 1998. Parliament pointed out that the dozens of "comfort women" cases brought before Japanese courts had all ended in the dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for compensation, despite court judgments acknowledging the Imperial Armed Forces" direct and indirect involvement, and the State's responsibility. It called on the Japanese Government : - formally to acknowledge, apologise, and accept historical and legal responsibility, in a clear and unequivocal manner, for its Imperial Armed Forces' coercion of young women into sexual slavery, known to the world as "comfort women", during its colonial and wartime occupation of Asia and the Pacific Islands from the 1930s until the end of World War II ; - to implement effective administrative mechanisms to provide reparations to all surviving victims of the "comfort women" system and the families of its deceased victims ; - to refute publicly any claims that the subjugation and enslavement of "comfort women" never occurred. The Japanese parliament (the Diet) was asked to take legal measures to remove existing obstacles to obtaining reparations before Japanese courts. In particular, the right of individuals to claim reparations from the government should be expressly recognised in national law, and cases for reparations for the survivors of sexual slavery, as a crime under international law, should be prioritised, taking into account the age of the survivors. Lastly, Parliament encouraged the Japanese people and government to take further steps to recognise the full history of their nation, as is the moral duty of all countries, and to foster awareness in Japan of its actions in the 1930s and 1940s, including in relation to "comfort women". The government of Japan must educate current and future generations about those events. date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
procedure/legal_basis/0	Rules of Procedure EP 135
procedure/legal_basis/0	Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 135
procedure/subject	Old 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general New 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general

2014-11-10Show (5) Changes

activities	date: 2007-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=14529&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20071213&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2007-632 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0632/2007 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
links
other
procedure	reference 2007/2682(RSP) title Resolution on Justice for the 'Comfort Women' legal_basis Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 135 stage_reached Procedure completed subtype Urgent debate or resolution type RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects subject 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:

Subjects

Links

Events

Documents

Activities

Votes

RC B6-0525/2007 - Justice pour les femmes de réconfort - résolution #

Germany PPE-DE

For (9)

Poland PPE-DE

For (3)

Italy PPE-DE

For (5)

United Kingdom PPE-DE

For (6)

Abstain (1)

France PPE-DE

For (2)

Greece PPE-DE

For (3)

Lithuania PPE-DE

For (1)

Slovakia PPE-DE

For (2)

Czechia PPE-DE

For (1)

Poland PSE

For (1)

Greece PSE

For (1)

Spain PSE

For (2)

Lithuania PSE

For (1)

Austria PSE

For (2)

Portugal PSE

For (1)

Poland UEN

For (5)

Italy UEN

For (1)

Netherlands ALDE

For (1)

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

France Verts/ALE

For (2)

Spain Verts/ALE

For (1)

Germany GUE/NGL

For (1)

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (2)

History

ParlTrack - 2011-2024