BETA


2008/2671(RSP) Resolution on the Economic Partnership Agreement between the Cariforum States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2009/10/08
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2009/03/25
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2009/03/25
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

Following the debate which took place during the sitting of 23 March 2009, the European Parliament adopted by 568 votes to 94 with 15 abstentions a resolution on the Economic Partnership Agreement between the Cariforum States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part. The resolution was tabled on behalf of the Committee on International Trade.

Parliament stresses that EPAs cannot be regarded as satisfactory unless they achieve the following objectives: offering the ACP countries support for sustainable development, promoting their participation in world trade, strengthening the regionalisation process, revitalising trade between the EU and ACP countries and promoting the economic diversification of ACP countries. The EPA must be supportive of the development objectives, policies and priorities of the Cariforum States, and should contribute to the achievement of the MDGs.

Members call on the Commission to clarify its stance on the stated EU objective of discouraging existing tax havens. They recall in this regard that eight out of the 14 Cariforum signatory states of the EPA are listed as tax havens by the OECD and that the Cariforum EPA provides for current account liberalisation for all residents, capital account liberalisation for investors, and almost unlimited cross-border activity of financial services, including the operation of "trust services" and "over-the-counter" trading of derivatives.

Parliament also made the following points:

it is convinced that comprehensive EPAs should be complementary to an agreement on the DDA and not an alternative for ACP countries; it highlights the importance of intra-regional trade and the need for increased regional trade links in order for sustainable growth to be ensured in the region; the interests of the outermost regions have not been sufficiently taken into account in respect of many aspects that were communicated to the Commission by the regional councils, and in consequence short-term inclusion of the outermost regions in interregional trade has been neglected; it encourages further lowering of tariffs between developing countries and regional groups, which today account for 15% to 25% percent of the trade value, to further promote south - south trade, economic growth and regional integration; the implementation of the Agreement must pay due regard to the integration processes in Cariforum, including the aims and objectives of the Caricom Single Market and Economy (CSME) as outlined in the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas; the Commission should clarify the actual distribution of funds throughout the ACP region arising from the pledged priority spending within the increased Aid for Trade budget; it calls on the ACP to propose the necessary additional EPA-related funds, particularly with regard to regulatory frameworks, safeguard measures, trade facilitation, support in meeting international sanitary and phytosanitary and intellectual property standards and the composition of the EPA monitoring mechanism; on the EU Strategy on Aid for Trade, with the commitment to increase the collective EU trade-related assistance to EUR 2 billion (2 000 000 000) annually by 2010 (EUR 1 billion from the Community, EUR 1 billion from the Member States), Parliament insists that the Cariforum States receive an appropriate and equitable share; the Commission should clarify which funds are additional to the funding of the 10th European Development Fund; if necessary, substantial changes to rules of origin should accompany the duty-free, quota-free (DFQF) initiative to produce a significant increase in goods exports; the Commission should report regularly to Parliament on the extent of patent applications and litigation under the Patent cooperation Treaty. Parliament urges the Commission not to seek to harmonise intellectual property rights standards upwards beyond what is appropriate for the level of development of the Cariforum States, and to ensure that the provisions regarding enforcement of intellectual property rights will not be used to thwart legitimate competition from generic pharmaceutical suppliers and/or to prevent government purchasing entities from acquiring generic supplies; the Commission should support the establishment of an independent monitoring mechanism within the Cariforum States endowed with the necessary resources to undertake the analysis necessary to determine the extent to which the EPA is achieving its objectives; Parliament stresses the need for the implementation of the EPAs to involve an appropriate monitoring system; it highlights the crucial role of Cariforum parliaments and non-state actors in the monitoring and management of the EPA; the European Council is asked to consult the regional councils of the outermost regions in the Caribbean (Martinique, Guadeloupe and French Guiana) prior to ratification of the EPA between the Cariforum States and the Member States of the EU;

Lastly, Members call for Parliament and the Cariforum parliaments to be involved in any revision of the EPA.

This resolution should be read in parallel with the EU-CARIFORUM stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement which is the subject of a separate assent procedure (see AVC/2008/0061 ).

Documents
2009/03/25
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2009/03/23
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents
2009/03/23
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents
2009/03/23
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2009/03/23
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

O-0033/2009

O-0034/2009

2009/02/10
   CSL - Council Meeting

Documents

Votes

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 10rev #

2009/03/25 Outcome: -: 377, +: 296, 0: 14
FR PT ES BE DK EL AT EE CY MT ?? SE LU FI SI NL CZ IE BG LV GB IT DE SK HU LT RO PL
Total
65
22
47
21
14
20
15
5
2
4
1
16
6
14
7
25
22
11
17
8
71
65
88
14
22
12
29
44
icon: PSE PSE
191

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Lithuania PSE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
27

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

7

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

Slovakia NI

3

Poland NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Ireland UEN

3

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2

Belgium ALDE

For (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Cyprus ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Hungary ALDE

2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
252

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Finland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia PPE-DE

For (1)

4

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 11rev #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 368, -: 299, 0: 17
FR DK NL BE FI IT PT ES BG LT EE AT SE CY DE MT GB SI LU EL ?? RO SK LV IE HU CZ PL
Total
66
14
25
21
14
65
22
47
17
11
5
15
16
2
87
4
70
7
5
21
1
28
14
8
11
22
22
44
icon: PSE PSE
190

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Ireland PSE

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
85

Estonia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
29

Belgium NI

2

Italy NI

Against (1)

3

Bulgaria NI

3

Austria NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Poland IND/DEM

3
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

3
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
250

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Finland PPE-DE

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania PPE-DE

1

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 16 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 648, 0: 22, -: 20
DE IT FR ES GB PL RO NL HU PT CZ BE EL BG FI AT SK DK LT IE SE LV SI LU EE MT CY ??
Total
88
67
67
46
71
44
28
25
22
22
23
21
20
17
14
15
14
14
12
11
16
8
7
6
5
4
2
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
253

Denmark PPE-DE

1
2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
194

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2
icon: NI NI
29

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Belgium NI

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Austria NI

Abstain (1)

2

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 15 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 637, -: 28, 0: 20
DE IT GB FR ES PL RO NL HU PT BE CZ EL BG FI DK AT SK LT SE IE LV SI EE LU MT CY ??
Total
87
66
71
65
47
43
27
25
22
22
22
22
21
17
14
14
15
14
12
16
11
8
7
5
5
4
2
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
253

Denmark PPE-DE

1
2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
190

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1
icon: UEN UEN
36

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Greece IND/DEM

1

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
29

Italy NI

For (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

3

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Slovakia NI

Abstain (1)

3

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 18 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 393, -: 279, 0: 12
IT FR BE PL DK NL LT FI PT ES BG EE LV GB SE CY IE AT DE RO LU MT SI EL ?? SK HU CZ
Total
66
67
22
43
14
25
12
14
21
46
16
5
8
71
16
2
10
15
88
28
6
4
7
20
1
14
20
23
icon: PSE PSE
191

Lithuania PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Ireland PSE

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
84

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Hungary ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
39

Italy Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1
icon: UEN UEN
36

Denmark UEN

Against (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2

Ireland UEN

2
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

3

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
29
3

Belgium NI

2

Poland NI

1

Bulgaria NI

3

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

7

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
252

Denmark PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE-DE

2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Ireland PPE-DE

4

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

Against (2)

2

Slovenia PPE-DE

4

PPE-DE

Against (1)

1

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 17 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 659, -: 15, 0: 13
DE IT FR GB ES PL RO NL HU PT BE EL CZ AT DK FI SK BG LT SE IE LV SI LU EE MT CY ??
Total
88
66
65
71
47
43
29
25
22
21
22
20
23
15
14
14
14
16
12
16
11
8
7
6
5
4
2
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
252

Denmark PPE-DE

1
2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
189

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2

Austria ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
35

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
29

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

7

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
19

France IND/DEM

2

Poland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Ireland IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - am 19 #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 654, 0: 24, -: 6
DE FR IT GB ES PL RO NL HU PT BE EL CZ SE AT BG FI DK SK LT IE LV SI LU EE MT CY ??
Total
87
67
66
70
46
43
29
24
22
21
22
21
21
16
15
17
14
14
14
11
11
8
7
6
5
4
2
1
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
251

Denmark PPE-DE

1
2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

PPE-DE

For (1)

1
icon: PSE PSE
192

Czechia PSE

2

Lithuania PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1

Estonia PSE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Italy Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
36

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1

Lithuania UEN

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
33

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
28

Italy NI

2

Poland NI

1

Belgium NI

2

Czechia NI

Abstain (1)

1

Austria NI

2

Bulgaria NI

3

Slovakia NI

Against (1)

3
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

France IND/DEM

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom IND/DEM

Against (1)

5

Poland IND/DEM

3

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Czechia IND/DEM

Against (1)

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Denmark IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland IND/DEM

For (1)

1

B6-0141/2009 - Accord CE/CARIFORUM - résolution #

2009/03/25 Outcome: +: 568, -: 94, 0: 15
DE IT ES GB PL FR RO HU BG BE NL SK PT LT EL SE FI IE AT SI CZ LV EE LU MT ?? DK CY
Total
86
65
46
71
43
64
29
22
17
22
25
14
20
12
20
15
13
10
14
7
22
8
5
6
4
1
14
2
icon: PPE-DE PPE-DE
249
2

Latvia PPE-DE

2

Luxembourg PPE-DE

3

Malta PPE-DE

2

PPE-DE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE-DE

1
icon: PSE PSE
185

Lithuania PSE

2

Finland PSE

2

Ireland PSE

1
3

Slovenia PSE

For (1)

1

Czechia PSE

2

Estonia PSE

3

Luxembourg PSE

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
85
2

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Cyprus ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: UEN UEN
37

Lithuania UEN

2

Denmark UEN

For (1)

1
icon: IND/DEM IND/DEM
18

Poland IND/DEM

3

France IND/DEM

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands IND/DEM

2

Greece IND/DEM

1

Sweden IND/DEM

2

Czechia IND/DEM

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark IND/DEM

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
29

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Bulgaria NI

3

Belgium NI

2

Austria NI

Against (1)

2

Czechia NI

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Italy Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Romania Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
34

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0203_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0203_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0204_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0204_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0141_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0141_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE
events/2
date
2009-03-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0175_EN.html title: T6-0175/2009
summary
events/2
date
2009-03-25T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0175_EN.html title: T6-0175/2009
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2009-203&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0203_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2009-204&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0204_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2009-141&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-6-2009-0141_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-175
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0175_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2009-02-10T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2922
  • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17003&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-175 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0175/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
committees
    council
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2922 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=2922*&MEET_DATE=10/02/2009 date: 2009-02-10T00:00:00
    docs
    • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2009-203&language=EN title: B6-0203/2009 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2009-204&language=EN title: B6-0204/2009 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B6-2009-141&language=EN title: B6-0141/2009 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2009-10-08T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=17003&j=0&l=en title: SP(2009)3245 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: O-0033/2009 O-0034/2009
    • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17003&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-175 title: T6-0175/2009 summary: Following the debate which took place during the sitting of 23 March 2009, the European Parliament adopted by 568 votes to 94 with 15 abstentions a resolution on the Economic Partnership Agreement between the Cariforum States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part. The resolution was tabled on behalf of the Committee on International Trade. Parliament stresses that EPAs cannot be regarded as satisfactory unless they achieve the following objectives: offering the ACP countries support for sustainable development, promoting their participation in world trade, strengthening the regionalisation process, revitalising trade between the EU and ACP countries and promoting the economic diversification of ACP countries. The EPA must be supportive of the development objectives, policies and priorities of the Cariforum States, and should contribute to the achievement of the MDGs. Members call on the Commission to clarify its stance on the stated EU objective of discouraging existing tax havens. They recall in this regard that eight out of the 14 Cariforum signatory states of the EPA are listed as tax havens by the OECD and that the Cariforum EPA provides for current account liberalisation for all residents, capital account liberalisation for investors, and almost unlimited cross-border activity of financial services, including the operation of "trust services" and "over-the-counter" trading of derivatives. Parliament also made the following points: it is convinced that comprehensive EPAs should be complementary to an agreement on the DDA and not an alternative for ACP countries; it highlights the importance of intra-regional trade and the need for increased regional trade links in order for sustainable growth to be ensured in the region; the interests of the outermost regions have not been sufficiently taken into account in respect of many aspects that were communicated to the Commission by the regional councils, and in consequence short-term inclusion of the outermost regions in interregional trade has been neglected; it encourages further lowering of tariffs between developing countries and regional groups, which today account for 15% to 25% percent of the trade value, to further promote south - south trade, economic growth and regional integration; the implementation of the Agreement must pay due regard to the integration processes in Cariforum, including the aims and objectives of the Caricom Single Market and Economy (CSME) as outlined in the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas; the Commission should clarify the actual distribution of funds throughout the ACP region arising from the pledged priority spending within the increased Aid for Trade budget; it calls on the ACP to propose the necessary additional EPA-related funds, particularly with regard to regulatory frameworks, safeguard measures, trade facilitation, support in meeting international sanitary and phytosanitary and intellectual property standards and the composition of the EPA monitoring mechanism; on the EU Strategy on Aid for Trade, with the commitment to increase the collective EU trade-related assistance to EUR 2 billion (2 000 000 000) annually by 2010 (EUR 1 billion from the Community, EUR 1 billion from the Member States), Parliament insists that the Cariforum States receive an appropriate and equitable share; the Commission should clarify which funds are additional to the funding of the 10th European Development Fund; if necessary, substantial changes to rules of origin should accompany the duty-free, quota-free (DFQF) initiative to produce a significant increase in goods exports; the Commission should report regularly to Parliament on the extent of patent applications and litigation under the Patent cooperation Treaty. Parliament urges the Commission not to seek to harmonise intellectual property rights standards upwards beyond what is appropriate for the level of development of the Cariforum States, and to ensure that the provisions regarding enforcement of intellectual property rights will not be used to thwart legitimate competition from generic pharmaceutical suppliers and/or to prevent government purchasing entities from acquiring generic supplies; the Commission should support the establishment of an independent monitoring mechanism within the Cariforum States endowed with the necessary resources to undertake the analysis necessary to determine the extent to which the EPA is achieving its objectives; Parliament stresses the need for the implementation of the EPAs to involve an appropriate monitoring system; it highlights the crucial role of Cariforum parliaments and non-state actors in the monitoring and management of the EPA; the European Council is asked to consult the regional councils of the outermost regions in the Caribbean (Martinique, Guadeloupe and French Guiana) prior to ratification of the EPA between the Cariforum States and the Member States of the EU; Lastly, Members call for Parliament and the Cariforum parliaments to be involved in any revision of the EPA. This resolution should be read in parallel with the EU-CARIFORUM stepping-stone Economic Partnership Agreement which is the subject of a separate assent procedure (see AVC/2008/0061 ).
    • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    • 6.30 Development cooperation
    • 6.30.01 Generalised scheme of tariff preferences, rules of origin
    • 6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
    • 6.40.06 Relations with ACP countries, conventions and generalities
    New
    6.20.03
    Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
    6.30
    Development cooperation
    6.30.01
    Generalised scheme of tariff preferences (GSP), rules of origin
    6.30.02
    Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
    6.40.06
    Relations with ACP countries, conventions and generalities
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    New
    Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
    procedure/subject/0
    6.20.01 Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
    procedure/title
    Old
    Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the Caribbean Forum of ACP (CARIFORUM) States
    New
    Resolution on the Economic Partnership Agreement between the Cariforum States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part
    activities
    • date: 2009-02-10T00:00:00 body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 2922
    • date: 2009-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090323&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2009-03-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=17003&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-175 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T6-0175/2009 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
      links
      other
      • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: ASHTON Catherine
      procedure
      reference
      2008/2671(RSP)
      title
      Economic Partnership Agreement between the EC and the Caribbean Forum of ACP (CARIFORUM) States
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Debate or resolution on oral questions
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject