BETA


2010/2199(DCE) Declaration on the lack of a transparent process for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and potentially objectionable content

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 136_

Events

2010/09/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a declaration on the lack of a transparent process for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and potentially objectionable content.

It notes that negotiations concerning the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) are ongoing, and that Parliament's co-decision role in commercial matters and its access to negotiation documents are guaranteed by the Lisbon Treaty. Accordingly, Members declare that the Commission should immediately make all documents related to the ongoing negotiations publicly available. They take the view that:

the proposed agreement should not indirectly impose harmonisation of EU copyright, patent or trademark law, and that the principle of subsidiarity should be respected; the proposed agreement should not force limitations upon judicial due process or weaken fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and the right to privacy; economic and innovation risks must be evaluated prior to introducing criminal sanctions where civil measures are already in place; internet service providers should not bear liability for the data they transmit or host through their services to an extent that would necessitate prior surveillance or filtering of such data.

Lastly, Parliament points out that any measure aimed at strengthening powers of cross-border inspection and seizure of goods should not harm global access to legal, affordable and safe medicines.

Documents
2010/09/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/0
date
2010-09-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0317_EN.html title: T7-0317/2010
summary
events/0
date
2010-09-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0317_EN.html title: T7-0317/2010
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136_
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-317
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2010-0317_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-317 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0317/2010 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
    events
    • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-317 title: T7-0317/2010 summary: The European Parliament adopted a declaration on the lack of a transparent process for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and potentially objectionable content. It notes that negotiations concerning the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) are ongoing, and that Parliament's co-decision role in commercial matters and its access to negotiation documents are guaranteed by the Lisbon Treaty. Accordingly, Members declare that the Commission should immediately make all documents related to the ongoing negotiations publicly available. They take the view that: the proposed agreement should not indirectly impose harmonisation of EU copyright, patent or trademark law, and that the principle of subsidiarity should be respected; the proposed agreement should not force limitations upon judicial due process or weaken fundamental rights such as freedom of expression and the right to privacy; economic and innovation risks must be evaluated prior to introducing criminal sanctions where civil measures are already in place; internet service providers should not bear liability for the data they transmit or host through their services to an extent that would necessitate prior surveillance or filtering of such data. Lastly, Parliament points out that any measure aimed at strengthening powers of cross-border inspection and seizure of goods should not harm global access to legal, affordable and safe medicines.
    • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 136
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 136
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 1.20.05 Public access to information and documents, administrative practice
      • 1.20.09 Protection of privacy and data protection
      • 6.20 Common commercial policy in general
      • 6.20.01 Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
      • 7.30.30.10 Action against counterfeiting
      New
      1.20.05
      Public access to information and documents, administrative practice
      1.20.09
      Protection of privacy and data protection
      6.20
      Common commercial policy in general
      6.20.01
      Agreements and relations in the context of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
      7.30.30.10
      Action against counterfeiting
      procedure/type
      Old
      DCE - Written declaration
      New
      DCE - Written declaration (historic)
      activities
      • date: 2010-09-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2010-317 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0317/2010 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2010/2199(DCE)
          title
          Declaration on the lack of a transparent process for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) and potentially objectionable content
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 136
          stage_reached
          Procedure completed
          type
          DCE - Written declaration
          subject