BETA


2010/2997(RSP) Resolution on the European integration process of Montenegro

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2011/09/12
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2011/03/09
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/03/09
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the European integration process of Montenegro, welcoming the European Council decision of 17 December 2010 to grant Montenegro the status of candidate country for accession to the EU. However, Parliament regrets the decoupling of candidate status from the right to open negotiations. It expects the negotiations to start at the latest after the publication on the 2011 Commission Progress Report, provided Montenegro makes good progress in fulfilling the benchmarks set by the Commission.

The resolution discusses the achievements and shortcomings of preparation for EU membership. It notes with satisfaction that Montenegro is strongly committed to regional cooperation and is a constructive regional partner. Members commend Montenegro on its good relations with its neighbouring countries and its overall stabilising role in the region. They welcome the recently ratified readmission agreements with Croatia and Serbia as well as the recently concluded extradition agreement with Serbia and Croatia, and call on Montenegro to resolve swiftly its border issue with Croatia through the International Court of Justice.

Parliament welcomes the fact that the process of establishing the legal and constitutional framework of the country has almost been finalised, but draws attention to the fact that the deadline for harmonising the existing legal system with the new constitution has been extended for the fourth time. Parliament calls on the authorities to adopt swiftly the outstanding legislation.

Parliament also notes good progress in adopting important legislation in the field of fighting corruption but underlines that corruption is still prevalent in many areas , especially in the construction, privatisation and public procurements sector. Moreover, the track record of investigations, prosecutions and final convictions in corruption cases remains low. Members stress the importance of establishing a clearly stated comprehensive framework to fight corruption, including better implementation of the law on free access to information and coordination between law enforcement agencies. Members also stress the need for ensuring accountability and efficiency of the judiciary and prosecutors as well as their independence from political interference. They call urgently for changes in the system for the appointment of judges and prosecutors, and an end to the practice of nomination of prosecutors and the members of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Councils solely by parliament by simple majority and by the government. The Commission is asked to include in its next progress report an assessment of the impact and results achieved, through the allocation of EU funds, in the reform of the judiciary and the fight against corruption.

The resolution goes on to make some observations on the need to reform public administration , calling for energetic steps to be taken to eliminate the cases of conflicts of interest in public administration by strengthening the Conflict of Interest Commission and granting it powers to verify declarations of assets by public officials and to sanction irregularities. Public administration still remains under-resourced and overtly politicised, and Parliament wants in particular for a review of the law on civil servants and state employees in order to establish a comprehensive and merit-based employment system. It underlines, equally, the need to strengthen human resources at the local level of administration and to provide sufficient financing for its functioning.

The resolution underlines the fact that organised crime, and above all money laundering and smuggling, remains a problem in spite of improvements in the legal framework and its implementation, and it calls on the authorities to take steps to boost law enforcement capacities and improve coordination between different bodies as well as cooperation with neighbouring and international authorities in order to establish a solid track record in combating organised crime.

Whilst welcoming the adoption of the general law on prohibition of discrimination in employment or provision of public services , Parliament underlines that vulnerable groups such as Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians and persons with disabilities still allegedly suffer discrimination and that discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity persists. It urges the Montenegrin authorities to ensure that the relevant legal provisions, including the law on minority rights and freedoms, are comprehensively implemented. Members call on the authorities to improve the living conditions of Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian communities, as well as providing them with identification documents which is a pre-condition for access to any public services.

Members move on to welcome the generally good inter-ethnic relations and good general protection of minority rights in the country, and reiterates that this is a positive basis from which to begin the peace-building process in a region that was, at one time, characterised by inter-ethnic violence and mass population displacement. However, they call for further consultation of the opinions of minority groups by the authorities in order to help reconciliation in the region, and they encourage both political and religious leaders on both sides of the Serbo-Montenegrin border to contribute to a positive inter-ethnic and inter-religious climate by finding compromise solutions on controversial issues including contested religious sites.

Lastly, Parliament calls for further steps to ensure the independence of media outlets, including strengthening the capacity and independence of the public broadcaster. It calls on the Montenegrin authorities to demonstrate their commitment with a view to ensuring that the media sector operates without political interference and that the independence of regulatory bodies is guaranteed. Members draw attention to disproportionate fines for defamation, which continue to hamper the freedom of the work of journalists, and stress that reported cases of intimidation and physical violence against journalists as well as against civil society activists must be fully investigated and prosecuted where appropriate.

Documents
2011/03/09
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/03/08
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2011/02/28
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2010/12/14
   CSL - Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council
Details

The Council adopted a series of conclusions on the enlargement strategy . These may be summarised as follows:

Welcoming the communication from the Commission of 9 November 2010 on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010-2011 , as well as the Opinions on Montenegro and Albania, and the progress reports on Turkey, Croatia, Iceland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. The Council states that it broadly shares the Commission’s assessments.

The Council reaffirms the strong support of the EU for taking the enlargement process forward but states that key challenges remain to be negotiated in most enlargement countries . Sound macro-economic and fiscal policies and EU-related reforms can help to overcome the economic crisis and to achieve sustainable growth. Strengthening the rule of law, including through judiciary reform and stepping up the fight against corruption and organised crime, remains crucial and requires sustained efforts. Public administration reform is also important for EU policies to function properly. Social and economic inclusion of vulnerable groups, including the Roma, should be improved. Problems affecting freedom of expression and the media remain a particular concern. Regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations are essential parts of the enlargement process. They contribute to reconciliation and a climate conducive to addressing open bilateral issues. The Council encourages all parties concerned to address bilateral issues, falling outside areas of EU competence and/or contractual obligations towards the EU, in a constructive spirit and taking into account overall EU interests.

As the countries concerned meet the standards which have been set, including notably those linked to democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights and freedoms, the EU is committed to working with them to advance to the next steps in the process. The Council welcomes the strengthened link between priorities identified for the (potential) candidate countries and the programming of financial assistance, in particular through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA).

As regards Montenegro : the Council welcomes the Commission’s Opinion on the Montenegro application for EU membership. Montenegro has made progress towards meeting the political criteria set by the Copenhagen European Council and the Stabilisation and Association Process requirements.

economic criteria : Montenegro has achieved a certain degree of macroeconomic stability. Montenegro’s track record in implementing its obligations under the Stabilisation and Association Agreement is positive overall. Montenegro would be in a position to take on the obligations of membership in the medium term in most of the acquis fields; political criteria : further efforts are needed, in particular on the implementation of the seven key priorities set out in the Commission's Opinion on Montenegro which need to be addressed. These key priorities focus on the rule of law, judicial reform, electoral reform, the role of parliament, public administration reform, media freedom and cooperation with civil society, addressing discrimination and the situation of displaced persons, and especially the fight against organised crime and corruption.

The Council notes that the opening of accession negotiations will be considered by the European Council, in line with established practice, once the Commission has assessed that Montenegro has achieved the necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria and has met in particular the key priorities set out in the Commission’s Opinion on the country. The Council invites the Commission to focus its 2011 progress report on Montenegro in particular on the implementation of these key priorities which need to be addressed and will return to this issue when the Commission has assessed that these conditions have been met.

In the light of the progress made by Montenegro, the Council welcomes the positive assessment of the Commission and notes that its recommendation of granting candidate status will be considered by the European Council.

2010/12/14
   CSL - Council Meeting

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0157_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0157_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110308&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2010-03-08-TOC_EN.html
events/3
date
2011-03-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0091_EN.html title: T7-0091/2011
summary
events/3
date
2011-03-09T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0091_EN.html title: T7-0091/2011
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-157&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0157_EN.html
docs/1/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-91
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0091_EN.html
activities
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3060 council: General Affairs date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110308&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19756&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-91 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0091/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
committees
    council
    • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: General Affairs meeting_id: 3060 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3060*&MEET_DATE=14/12/2010 date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00
    docs
    • date: 2011-02-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-157&language=EN title: B7-0157/2011 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2011-09-12T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=19756&j=0&l=en title: SP(2011)5426 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 type: Resolution/conclusions adopted by Council body: CSL summary: The Council adopted a series of conclusions on the enlargement strategy . These may be summarised as follows: Welcoming the communication from the Commission of 9 November 2010 on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010-2011 , as well as the Opinions on Montenegro and Albania, and the progress reports on Turkey, Croatia, Iceland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. The Council states that it broadly shares the Commission’s assessments. The Council reaffirms the strong support of the EU for taking the enlargement process forward but states that key challenges remain to be negotiated in most enlargement countries . Sound macro-economic and fiscal policies and EU-related reforms can help to overcome the economic crisis and to achieve sustainable growth. Strengthening the rule of law, including through judiciary reform and stepping up the fight against corruption and organised crime, remains crucial and requires sustained efforts. Public administration reform is also important for EU policies to function properly. Social and economic inclusion of vulnerable groups, including the Roma, should be improved. Problems affecting freedom of expression and the media remain a particular concern. Regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations are essential parts of the enlargement process. They contribute to reconciliation and a climate conducive to addressing open bilateral issues. The Council encourages all parties concerned to address bilateral issues, falling outside areas of EU competence and/or contractual obligations towards the EU, in a constructive spirit and taking into account overall EU interests. As the countries concerned meet the standards which have been set, including notably those linked to democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights and freedoms, the EU is committed to working with them to advance to the next steps in the process. The Council welcomes the strengthened link between priorities identified for the (potential) candidate countries and the programming of financial assistance, in particular through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). As regards Montenegro : the Council welcomes the Commission’s Opinion on the Montenegro application for EU membership. Montenegro has made progress towards meeting the political criteria set by the Copenhagen European Council and the Stabilisation and Association Process requirements. economic criteria : Montenegro has achieved a certain degree of macroeconomic stability. Montenegro’s track record in implementing its obligations under the Stabilisation and Association Agreement is positive overall. Montenegro would be in a position to take on the obligations of membership in the medium term in most of the acquis fields; political criteria : further efforts are needed, in particular on the implementation of the seven key priorities set out in the Commission's Opinion on Montenegro which need to be addressed. These key priorities focus on the rule of law, judicial reform, electoral reform, the role of parliament, public administration reform, media freedom and cooperation with civil society, addressing discrimination and the situation of displaced persons, and especially the fight against organised crime and corruption. The Council notes that the opening of accession negotiations will be considered by the European Council, in line with established practice, once the Commission has assessed that Montenegro has achieved the necessary degree of compliance with the membership criteria and has met in particular the key priorities set out in the Commission’s Opinion on the country. The Council invites the Commission to focus its 2011 progress report on Montenegro in particular on the implementation of these key priorities which need to be addressed and will return to this issue when the Commission has assessed that these conditions have been met. In the light of the progress made by Montenegro, the Council welcomes the positive assessment of the Commission and notes that its recommendation of granting candidate status will be considered by the European Council.
    • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110308&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2011-03-09T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19756&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2011-03-09T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-91 title: T7-0091/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the European integration process of Montenegro, welcoming the European Council decision of 17 December 2010 to grant Montenegro the status of candidate country for accession to the EU. However, Parliament regrets the decoupling of candidate status from the right to open negotiations. It expects the negotiations to start at the latest after the publication on the 2011 Commission Progress Report, provided Montenegro makes good progress in fulfilling the benchmarks set by the Commission. The resolution discusses the achievements and shortcomings of preparation for EU membership. It notes with satisfaction that Montenegro is strongly committed to regional cooperation and is a constructive regional partner. Members commend Montenegro on its good relations with its neighbouring countries and its overall stabilising role in the region. They welcome the recently ratified readmission agreements with Croatia and Serbia as well as the recently concluded extradition agreement with Serbia and Croatia, and call on Montenegro to resolve swiftly its border issue with Croatia through the International Court of Justice. Parliament welcomes the fact that the process of establishing the legal and constitutional framework of the country has almost been finalised, but draws attention to the fact that the deadline for harmonising the existing legal system with the new constitution has been extended for the fourth time. Parliament calls on the authorities to adopt swiftly the outstanding legislation. Parliament also notes good progress in adopting important legislation in the field of fighting corruption but underlines that corruption is still prevalent in many areas , especially in the construction, privatisation and public procurements sector. Moreover, the track record of investigations, prosecutions and final convictions in corruption cases remains low. Members stress the importance of establishing a clearly stated comprehensive framework to fight corruption, including better implementation of the law on free access to information and coordination between law enforcement agencies. Members also stress the need for ensuring accountability and efficiency of the judiciary and prosecutors as well as their independence from political interference. They call urgently for changes in the system for the appointment of judges and prosecutors, and an end to the practice of nomination of prosecutors and the members of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Councils solely by parliament by simple majority and by the government. The Commission is asked to include in its next progress report an assessment of the impact and results achieved, through the allocation of EU funds, in the reform of the judiciary and the fight against corruption. The resolution goes on to make some observations on the need to reform public administration , calling for energetic steps to be taken to eliminate the cases of conflicts of interest in public administration by strengthening the Conflict of Interest Commission and granting it powers to verify declarations of assets by public officials and to sanction irregularities. Public administration still remains under-resourced and overtly politicised, and Parliament wants in particular for a review of the law on civil servants and state employees in order to establish a comprehensive and merit-based employment system. It underlines, equally, the need to strengthen human resources at the local level of administration and to provide sufficient financing for its functioning. The resolution underlines the fact that organised crime, and above all money laundering and smuggling, remains a problem in spite of improvements in the legal framework and its implementation, and it calls on the authorities to take steps to boost law enforcement capacities and improve coordination between different bodies as well as cooperation with neighbouring and international authorities in order to establish a solid track record in combating organised crime. Whilst welcoming the adoption of the general law on prohibition of discrimination in employment or provision of public services , Parliament underlines that vulnerable groups such as Roma, Ashkali and Egyptians and persons with disabilities still allegedly suffer discrimination and that discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity persists. It urges the Montenegrin authorities to ensure that the relevant legal provisions, including the law on minority rights and freedoms, are comprehensively implemented. Members call on the authorities to improve the living conditions of Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian communities, as well as providing them with identification documents which is a pre-condition for access to any public services. Members move on to welcome the generally good inter-ethnic relations and good general protection of minority rights in the country, and reiterates that this is a positive basis from which to begin the peace-building process in a region that was, at one time, characterised by inter-ethnic violence and mass population displacement. However, they call for further consultation of the opinions of minority groups by the authorities in order to help reconciliation in the region, and they encourage both political and religious leaders on both sides of the Serbo-Montenegrin border to contribute to a positive inter-ethnic and inter-religious climate by finding compromise solutions on controversial issues including contested religious sites. Lastly, Parliament calls for further steps to ensure the independence of media outlets, including strengthening the capacity and independence of the public broadcaster. It calls on the Montenegrin authorities to demonstrate their commitment with a view to ensuring that the media sector operates without political interference and that the independence of regulatory bodies is guaranteed. Members draw attention to disproportionate fines for defamation, which continue to hamper the freedom of the work of journalists, and stress that reported cases of intimidation and physical violence against journalists as well as against civil society activists must be fully investigated and prosecuted where appropriate.
    • date: 2011-03-09T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 123-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 8.20.01 Candidate countries
    New
    8.20.01
    Candidate countries
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Resolution on statements
    New
    Resolution on statement
    activities
    • body: CSL meeting_id: 3060 council: General Affairs date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
    • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110308&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2011-03-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=19756&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-91 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0091/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
    committees
      links
      other
      • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/ title: Enlargement commissioner: FÜLE Štefan
      procedure
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
      reference
      2010/2997(RSP)
      title
      Resolution on the European integration process of Montenegro
      geographical_area
      Montenegro, from 06/2006
      stage_reached
      Procedure completed
      subtype
      Resolution on statements
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject
      8.20.01 Candidate countries