BETA


2011/2006(INL) Insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (icon: PPE PPE) REGNER Evelyn (icon: S&D S&D), LICHTENBERGER Eva (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), KARIM Sajjad (icon: ECR ECR), SPERONI Francesco Enrico (icon: EFD EFD)
Committee Opinion ECON BOWLES Sharon (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion EMPL GIRLING Julie (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47

Events

2012/03/05
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2011/11/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/11/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law (Initiative – Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure).

Parliament notes that disparities between national insolvency laws create competitive advantages or disadvantages and difficulties for companies with cross-border activities which could become obstacles to a successful restructuring of insolvent companies (“forum shopping”). However, the existence of identical conditions for all would help to strengthen the single market.

If the creation of a body of substantive insolvency law at EU level is not possible, there are certain areas of insolvency law where harmonisation is worthwhile and achievable. It is for this reason that Members request the Commission to submit to Parliament on the basis of Article 50, Article 81(2) or Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, one or more legislative proposals relating to an EU corporate insolvency framework , following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto, in order to ensure a level playing field, based on a profound analysis of all viable alternatives.

The detailed recommendations as to the content of the proposal requested are as follows:

1. The harmonisation of specific aspects of insolvency and company law : Parliament recommends in particular:

the harmonisation, by means of a directive, of certain aspects of the opening of insolvency proceedings (e.g. the proceedings can be brought against debtors who are natural persons, legal entities or associations; the proceedings are initiated in a timely manner in order to allow a rescue of a troubled enterprise; a creditor may request the opening of proceedings if he/she has a legal interest therein and shows credibly that he/she has a claim); the harmonisation of the conditions under which claims in insolvency proceedings are to be filed (e.g. that the date for determining outstanding claims is the date on which the employer becomes insolvent; that creditors file their claim with the liquidator in written form within a certain period of time; that Member States are required to fix the above-mentioned period of time within one to three months from the date of publication of the bankruptcy decision); the harmonisation of aspects of avoidance actions (e.g. acts that can be the object of an avoidance action are transactions in a situation of imminent insolvency, the creation of security rights, transactions with connected parties and transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors); the harmonisation of general aspects of the requirements for the qualification and work of liquidators (e.g. the liquidator must be approved by a competent authority of a Member State or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of a Member State, must be of good repute and must have the educational background needed for the performance of his/her duties; – the liquidator must be competent and qualified to assess the situation of the debtor’s entity and to take over management duties for the company; the harmonisation of aspects of restructuring plans (e.g. the plan must i) contain rules for the satisfaction of the creditors and for the debtor’s liability after the insolvency proceeding have been concluded; ii) the plan must contain all relevant information enabling the creditors to decide whether they can accept the plan; iii) the plan must be approved or disapproved in a specific procedure before the relevant court);

2. The revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings : the recommendations relate to:

the scope of the Insolvency Regulation which should be broadened to include insolvency proceedings in which the debtor remains in possession or where a preliminary liquidator has been appointed; the inclusion of a definition of the term ‘centre of main interest’ formulated in such a way as to prevent fraudulent forum shopping; the inclusion of a definition of ‘establishment’ as any place of operations where the debtor carries on a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods and services; provision for an unequivocal duty of communication and cooperation not only between liquidators but also between courts; the Insolvency Regulation should be reviewed so that it does not encourage cross-border avoidance actions but helps to prevent avoidance actions from succeeding by means of choice-of-law clauses.

3. The insolvency of groups of companies : due to the different levels of integration which may exist within a group of companies, Parliament considers that the Commission should present a flexible proposal for the regulation of the insolvency of groups of companies, whenever the functional/ownership structure allows it. They also suggest providing for an instrument for insolvency proceedings in respect of decentralised groups . In this case, the instrument should provide, inter alia :

rules for mandatory coordination and cooperation between courts, between courts and insolvency representatives and between insolvency representatives; rules on immediate recognition of judgments concerning the opening, conduct and closure of insolvency proceedings and judgments handed down in connection with such proceedings; rules on access to courts by liquidators and creditors; rules allowing and promoting cross-border insolvency agreements which would address the allocation of responsibility for various aspects of the conduct and administration of the proceedings between the different courts involved and between insolvency representatives.

4. The creation of an EU insolvency register: Members propose the creation of an EU insolvency register in the context of the European e-Justice Portal, which should contain, for every cross-border insolvency opened, at least: (i) the relevant court orders and judgments, (ii) the appointment of the liquidator and that person's contact details, and (iii) the deadlines for filing claims. Transmission of these data to the EU registry by the courts should be compulsory.

Parliament considers that the legislative action requested should be based on detailed impact assessments , as requested by Parliament.

Documents
2011/11/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/10/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2011/10/17
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2011/10/11
   EP - Vote in committee
Details

The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted a report by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP, DE) with recommendations to the Commission on insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law (Initiative – Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure).

The Committee responsible notes that disparities between national insolvency laws create competitive advantages or disadvantages and difficulties for companies with cross-border activities which could become obstacles to a successful restructuring of insolvent companies (“forum shopping”).

Underlining that the existence of identical conditions for all would help to strengthen the single market, Members request the Commission to submit to Parliament on the basis of Article 50, Article 81(2) or Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, one or more legislative proposals relating to an EU corporate insolvency framework , following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto, in order to ensure a level playing field, based on a profound analysis of all viable alternatives.

The detailed recommendations as to the content of the proposal requested are as follows:

1. The harmonisation of specific aspects of insolvency and company law : Members recommend in particular:

the harmonisation, by means of a directive, of certain aspects of the opening of insolvency proceedings (e.g. the proceedings can be brought against debtors who are natural persons, legal entities or associations; the proceedings are initiated in a timely manner in order to allow a rescue of a troubled enterprise; a creditor may request the opening of proceedings if he/she has a legal interest therein and shows credibly that he/she has a claim); the harmonisation of the conditions under which claims in insolvency proceedings are to be filed (e.g. that the date for determining outstanding claims is the date on which the employer becomes insolvent; that creditors file their claim with the liquidator in written form within a certain period of time; that Member States are required to fix the above-mentioned period of time within one to three months from the date of publication of the bankruptcy decision); the harmonisation of aspects of avoidance actions (e.g. acts that can be the object of an avoidance action are transactions in a situation of imminent insolvency, the creation of security rights, transactions with connected parties and transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors); the harmonisation of general aspects of the requirements for the qualification and work of liquidators (e.g. the liquidator must be approved by a competent authority of a Member State or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of a Member State, must be of good repute and must have the educational background needed for the performance of his/her duties; – the liquidator must be competent and qualified to assess the situation of the debtor’s entity and to take over management duties for the company; the harmonisation of aspects of restructuring plans (e.g. the plan must i) contain rules for the satisfaction of the creditors and for the debtor’s liability after the insolvency proceeding have been concluded; ii) the plan must contain all relevant information enabling the creditors to decide whether they can accept the plan; iii) the plan must be approved or disapproved in a specific procedure before the relevant court);

2. The revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings : the recommendations relate to:

the scope of the Insolvency Regulation which should be broadened to include insolvency proceedings in which the debtor remains in possession or where a preliminary liquidator has been appointed; the inclusion of a definition of the term ‘centre of main interest’ formulated in such a way as to prevent fraudulent forum shopping; the inclusion of a definition of ‘establishment’ as any place of operations where the debtor carries on a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods and services; provision for an unequivocal duty of communication and cooperation not only between liquidators but also between courts; the Insolvency Regulation should be reviewed so that it does not encourage cross-border avoidance actions but helps to prevent avoidance actions from succeeding by means of choice-of-law clauses.

3. The insolvency of groups of companies : due to the different levels of integration which may exist within a group of companies, Parliament considers that the Commission should present a flexible proposal for the regulation of the insolvency of groups of companies, whenever the functional/ownership structure allows it. They also suggest providing for an instrument for insolvency proceedings in respect of decentralised groups.

4. The creation of an EU insolvency register: Members propose the creation of an EU insolvency register in the context of the European e-Justice Portal, which should contain, for every cross-border insolvency opened, at least: (i) the relevant court orders and judgments, (ii) the appointment of the liquidator and that person's contact details, and (iii) the deadlines for filing claims. Transmission of these data to the EU registry by the courts should be compulsory.

Members consider that the legislative action requested should be based on detailed impact assessments , as requested by Parliament.

2011/07/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/07/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/06/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2011/05/31
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/01/20
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2010/12/16
   EP - GIRLING Julie (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2010/12/14
   EP - BOWLES Sharon (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON
2010/12/01
   EP - LEHNE Klaus-Heiner (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
MAŠTÁLKA Jiří
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.820&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-458820_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.008
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-PR-467008_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.777&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-464777_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.800
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AM-469800_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0355_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0355_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2011-10-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0355_EN.html title: A7-0355/2011
events/2
date
2011-10-17T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0355_EN.html title: A7-0355/2011
events/4
date
2011-11-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0484_EN.html title: T7-0484/2011
summary
events/4
date
2011-11-15T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0484_EN.html title: T7-0484/2011
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 47
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 046
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
rapporteur
name: BOWLES Sharon date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2010-12-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BOWLES Sharon group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: GIRLING Julie date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2010-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GIRLING Julie group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-355&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0355_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-355&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0355_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-484
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0484_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BOWLES Sharon body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: Verts/ALE name: LICHTENBERGER Eva group: ECR name: KARIM Sajjad group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: EFD name: SPERONI Francesco Enrico responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • date: 2011-10-11T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BOWLES Sharon body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: Verts/ALE name: LICHTENBERGER Eva group: ECR name: KARIM Sajjad group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: EFD name: SPERONI Francesco Enrico responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-355&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0355/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20685&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-484 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0484/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BARNIER Michel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ECON
date
2010-12-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: BOWLES Sharon
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
date
2010-12-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BOWLES Sharon group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2010-12-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2010-12-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: GIRLING Julie group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
docs
  • date: 2011-05-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.820&secondRef=02 title: PE458.820 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-06-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE467.008 title: PE467.008 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-07-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE464.777&secondRef=02 title: PE464.777 committee: ECON type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-07-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.800 title: PE469.800 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-355&language=EN title: A7-0355/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2012-03-05T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=20685&j=0&l=en title: SP(2012)55 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-10-11T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted a report by Klaus-Heiner LEHNE (EPP, DE) with recommendations to the Commission on insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law (Initiative – Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure). The Committee responsible notes that disparities between national insolvency laws create competitive advantages or disadvantages and difficulties for companies with cross-border activities which could become obstacles to a successful restructuring of insolvent companies (“forum shopping”). Underlining that the existence of identical conditions for all would help to strengthen the single market, Members request the Commission to submit to Parliament on the basis of Article 50, Article 81(2) or Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, one or more legislative proposals relating to an EU corporate insolvency framework , following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto, in order to ensure a level playing field, based on a profound analysis of all viable alternatives. The detailed recommendations as to the content of the proposal requested are as follows: 1. The harmonisation of specific aspects of insolvency and company law : Members recommend in particular: the harmonisation, by means of a directive, of certain aspects of the opening of insolvency proceedings (e.g. the proceedings can be brought against debtors who are natural persons, legal entities or associations; the proceedings are initiated in a timely manner in order to allow a rescue of a troubled enterprise; a creditor may request the opening of proceedings if he/she has a legal interest therein and shows credibly that he/she has a claim); the harmonisation of the conditions under which claims in insolvency proceedings are to be filed (e.g. that the date for determining outstanding claims is the date on which the employer becomes insolvent; that creditors file their claim with the liquidator in written form within a certain period of time; that Member States are required to fix the above-mentioned period of time within one to three months from the date of publication of the bankruptcy decision); the harmonisation of aspects of avoidance actions (e.g. acts that can be the object of an avoidance action are transactions in a situation of imminent insolvency, the creation of security rights, transactions with connected parties and transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors); the harmonisation of general aspects of the requirements for the qualification and work of liquidators (e.g. the liquidator must be approved by a competent authority of a Member State or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of a Member State, must be of good repute and must have the educational background needed for the performance of his/her duties; – the liquidator must be competent and qualified to assess the situation of the debtor’s entity and to take over management duties for the company; the harmonisation of aspects of restructuring plans (e.g. the plan must i) contain rules for the satisfaction of the creditors and for the debtor’s liability after the insolvency proceeding have been concluded; ii) the plan must contain all relevant information enabling the creditors to decide whether they can accept the plan; iii) the plan must be approved or disapproved in a specific procedure before the relevant court); 2. The revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings : the recommendations relate to: the scope of the Insolvency Regulation which should be broadened to include insolvency proceedings in which the debtor remains in possession or where a preliminary liquidator has been appointed; the inclusion of a definition of the term ‘centre of main interest’ formulated in such a way as to prevent fraudulent forum shopping; the inclusion of a definition of ‘establishment’ as any place of operations where the debtor carries on a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods and services; provision for an unequivocal duty of communication and cooperation not only between liquidators but also between courts; the Insolvency Regulation should be reviewed so that it does not encourage cross-border avoidance actions but helps to prevent avoidance actions from succeeding by means of choice-of-law clauses. 3. The insolvency of groups of companies : due to the different levels of integration which may exist within a group of companies, Parliament considers that the Commission should present a flexible proposal for the regulation of the insolvency of groups of companies, whenever the functional/ownership structure allows it. They also suggest providing for an instrument for insolvency proceedings in respect of decentralised groups. 4. The creation of an EU insolvency register: Members propose the creation of an EU insolvency register in the context of the European e-Justice Portal, which should contain, for every cross-border insolvency opened, at least: (i) the relevant court orders and judgments, (ii) the appointment of the liquidator and that person's contact details, and (iii) the deadlines for filing claims. Transmission of these data to the EU registry by the courts should be compulsory. Members consider that the legislative action requested should be based on detailed impact assessments , as requested by Parliament.
  • date: 2011-10-17T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-355&language=EN title: A7-0355/2011
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20685&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-484 title: T7-0484/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law (Initiative – Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure). Parliament notes that disparities between national insolvency laws create competitive advantages or disadvantages and difficulties for companies with cross-border activities which could become obstacles to a successful restructuring of insolvent companies (“forum shopping”). However, the existence of identical conditions for all would help to strengthen the single market. If the creation of a body of substantive insolvency law at EU level is not possible, there are certain areas of insolvency law where harmonisation is worthwhile and achievable. It is for this reason that Members request the Commission to submit to Parliament on the basis of Article 50, Article 81(2) or Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, one or more legislative proposals relating to an EU corporate insolvency framework , following the detailed recommendations set out in the Annex hereto, in order to ensure a level playing field, based on a profound analysis of all viable alternatives. The detailed recommendations as to the content of the proposal requested are as follows: 1. The harmonisation of specific aspects of insolvency and company law : Parliament recommends in particular: the harmonisation, by means of a directive, of certain aspects of the opening of insolvency proceedings (e.g. the proceedings can be brought against debtors who are natural persons, legal entities or associations; the proceedings are initiated in a timely manner in order to allow a rescue of a troubled enterprise; a creditor may request the opening of proceedings if he/she has a legal interest therein and shows credibly that he/she has a claim); the harmonisation of the conditions under which claims in insolvency proceedings are to be filed (e.g. that the date for determining outstanding claims is the date on which the employer becomes insolvent; that creditors file their claim with the liquidator in written form within a certain period of time; that Member States are required to fix the above-mentioned period of time within one to three months from the date of publication of the bankruptcy decision); the harmonisation of aspects of avoidance actions (e.g. acts that can be the object of an avoidance action are transactions in a situation of imminent insolvency, the creation of security rights, transactions with connected parties and transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors); the harmonisation of general aspects of the requirements for the qualification and work of liquidators (e.g. the liquidator must be approved by a competent authority of a Member State or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of a Member State, must be of good repute and must have the educational background needed for the performance of his/her duties; – the liquidator must be competent and qualified to assess the situation of the debtor’s entity and to take over management duties for the company; the harmonisation of aspects of restructuring plans (e.g. the plan must i) contain rules for the satisfaction of the creditors and for the debtor’s liability after the insolvency proceeding have been concluded; ii) the plan must contain all relevant information enabling the creditors to decide whether they can accept the plan; iii) the plan must be approved or disapproved in a specific procedure before the relevant court); 2. The revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings : the recommendations relate to: the scope of the Insolvency Regulation which should be broadened to include insolvency proceedings in which the debtor remains in possession or where a preliminary liquidator has been appointed; the inclusion of a definition of the term ‘centre of main interest’ formulated in such a way as to prevent fraudulent forum shopping; the inclusion of a definition of ‘establishment’ as any place of operations where the debtor carries on a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods and services; provision for an unequivocal duty of communication and cooperation not only between liquidators but also between courts; the Insolvency Regulation should be reviewed so that it does not encourage cross-border avoidance actions but helps to prevent avoidance actions from succeeding by means of choice-of-law clauses. 3. The insolvency of groups of companies : due to the different levels of integration which may exist within a group of companies, Parliament considers that the Commission should present a flexible proposal for the regulation of the insolvency of groups of companies, whenever the functional/ownership structure allows it. They also suggest providing for an instrument for insolvency proceedings in respect of decentralised groups . In this case, the instrument should provide, inter alia : rules for mandatory coordination and cooperation between courts, between courts and insolvency representatives and between insolvency representatives; rules on immediate recognition of judgments concerning the opening, conduct and closure of insolvency proceedings and judgments handed down in connection with such proceedings; rules on access to courts by liquidators and creditors; rules allowing and promoting cross-border insolvency agreements which would address the allocation of responsibility for various aspects of the conduct and administration of the proceedings between the different courts involved and between insolvency representatives. 4. The creation of an EU insolvency register: Members propose the creation of an EU insolvency register in the context of the European e-Justice Portal, which should contain, for every cross-border insolvency opened, at least: (i) the relevant court orders and judgments, (ii) the appointment of the liquidator and that person's contact details, and (iii) the deadlines for filing claims. Transmission of these data to the EU registry by the courts should be compulsory. Parliament considers that the legislative action requested should be based on detailed impact assessments , as requested by Parliament.
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
JURI/7/04999
New
  • JURI/7/04999
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 046
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.45.01 Company law
  • 7.40.02 Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
New
3.45.01
Company law
7.40.02
Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters
activities
  • date: 2011-01-20T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BOWLES Sharon body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: Verts/ALE name: LICHTENBERGER Eva group: ECR name: KARIM Sajjad group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: EFD name: SPERONI Francesco Enrico responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
  • date: 2011-10-11T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BOWLES Sharon body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: Verts/ALE name: LICHTENBERGER Eva group: ECR name: KARIM Sajjad group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: EFD name: SPERONI Francesco Enrico responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-355&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0355/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20685&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-484 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0484/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ECON date: 2010-12-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: BOWLES Sharon
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-12-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: GIRLING Julie
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: REGNER Evelyn group: Verts/ALE name: LICHTENBERGER Eva group: ECR name: KARIM Sajjad group: GUE/NGL name: MAŠTÁLKA Jiří group: EFD name: SPERONI Francesco Enrico responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: LEHNE Klaus-Heiner
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
JURI/7/04999
reference
2011/2006(INL)
title
Insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Request for legislative proposal
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INL - Legislative initiative procedure
subject