Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFCO | GUILLAUME Sylvie ( S&D), HÄFNER Gerald ( Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley ( ECR), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten ( EFD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 236
Legal Basis:
RoP 236Events
The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the exercise of Parliament's rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice (interpretation of Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure).
Parliament decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 128:
Rule 90(6) of the Rules of Procedure lays down a specific procedure by means of which Parliament can take a decision on whether to exercise its prerogative, pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU, to seek an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility of an international agreement with the Treaties. That provision constitutes a “lex specialis” which takes precedence over the general provision laid down in Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure.
When a decision must be taken as to whether Parliament should exercise its rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the act in question is not covered by Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure, the procedure provided for in this rule should apply, mutatis mutandis.
The European Parliament adopted a decision concerning the exercise of Parliament's rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice (interpretation of Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure).
Parliament decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 128:
Rule 90(6) of the Rules of Procedure lays down a specific procedure by means of which Parliament can take a decision on whether to exercise its prerogative, pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU, to seek an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility of an international agreement with the Treaties. That provision constitutes a “lex specialis” which takes precedence over the general provision laid down in Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure.
When a decision must be taken as to whether Parliament should exercise its rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the act in question is not covered by Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure, the procedure provided for in this rule should apply, mutatis mutandis.
Documents
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0119/2011
- Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: T7-0119/2011
- Text adopted by Parliament, single reading: T7-0119/2011
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0119_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0119_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/2 |
|
events/2 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-119New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0119_EN.html |
events/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-119New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0119_EN.html |
activities |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFCO/7/05213New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 236
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 226
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/title |
Old
EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 128: exercise of Parliament's rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice, interpretationNew
EP Rules of Procedure, Rule 128: exercise of Parliament's rights vis-à-vis the Court of Justice, interpretation |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|