BETA


2011/2625(RSP) Resolution on EU-Japan trade relations

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2011/09/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2011/05/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/05/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU-Japan Trade relations.

The resolution was tabled by the EPP, ALDE and ECR groups.

Parliament underlines that it is in favour of a free trade agreement between the EU and Japan but is not satisfied with the negligible progress in the High Level Group during the last few years. It considers that Japan must make significant commitments on removing non-tariff barriers and obstacles to access to Japanese public procurement before negotiations are launched. Both the Council and Commission have noted that Japan’s capacity to remove regulatory barriers to trade is a precondition for launching negotiations on the EU-Japan FTA. The EU and Japan have generally low tariffs on goods with more than two thirds of the Union’s export value to Japan being duty-free and more than one third of Japan’s export value to the EU, but despite these low tariffs, bilateral trade volumes between the EU and Japan lag behind the bulk of the EU's trade exchanges with its other main trading partners, mostly because of the negative effects of Japanese non-tariff barriers (NTBs) on market access opportunities for European businesses . Members further note that a study in 2009 estimates that the trade costs associated with non-tariff barriers are higher than the existing tariff levels and that most of the potential economic gains reside in the removal of those NTB, and also estimates potential increases in EU exports to Japan of EUR 43 billion and EUR 53 for Japanese exports to the EU if tariffs and non-tariff measures are reduced to their fullest possible extent. Accordingly, Parliament considers that, in trade negotiations with Japan, the Commission should concentrate, as one of its priorities, on removing those barriers and obstacles that are of greatest hindrance to market access for European SMEs.

The reduction or elimination of Japanese tariffs on ICT products, including their parts and components, would step up competitiveness and generate new high-quality jobs in the EU. Parliament calls, in addition, for intensified mutual cooperation between the EU and Japan in the field of R&D and especially on IPR enforcement to accelerate the sharing of information on patents between the respective patent offices.

It considers that the Commission's level of ambition in respect of the EU-Japan FTA, and especially increasing market access for European businesses, should be complemented by jointly agreed comprehensive sustainable development commitments . Furthermore a comprehensive sustainability and impact assessment is paramount to an overall assessment of EU-Japan trade relations. Members ask the Commission to present such an assessment in due time, detailing in particular the possible advantages and disadvantages of reinforced trading relations between the EU and Japan for all sectors involved, and in particular for all industrial sectors and those which are more sensitive, such as the automotive, electronics, aviation and machinery sectors.

Lastly, they recommends that effective bilateral safeguard measures be included in the design of an EU-Japan FTA to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to EU and Japanese industry, especially in sensitive sectors such as the automotive, electronics, aviation and machinery industries.

Documents
2011/05/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/05/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
Details

O-000088/2011

2011/05/04
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2011/05/04
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2011/05/04
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2011/05/04
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2011/04/18
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0220_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0220_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0287_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0287_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0288_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0288_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0289_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0289_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0290_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0290_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110509&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-05-09-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2011-05-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0225_EN.html title: T7-0225/2011
summary
events/2
date
2011-05-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0225_EN.html title: T7-0225/2011
summary
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-220&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0220_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-287&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0287_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-288&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0288_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-289&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0289_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-290&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2011-0290_EN.html
docs/5/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-225
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0225_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2011-05-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110509&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20078&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-225 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0225/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
    docs
    • date: 2011-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-220&language=EN title: B7-0220/2011 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2011-05-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-287&language=EN title: B7-0287/2011 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2011-05-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-288&language=EN title: B7-0288/2011 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2011-05-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-289&language=EN title: B7-0289/2011 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2011-05-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2011-290&language=EN title: B7-0290/2011 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2011-09-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=20078&j=0&l=en title: SP(2011)6333 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
    events
    • date: 2011-05-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110509&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament summary: O-000088/2011
    • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20078&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-225 title: T7-0225/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on EU-Japan Trade relations. The resolution was tabled by the EPP, ALDE and ECR groups. Parliament underlines that it is in favour of a free trade agreement between the EU and Japan but is not satisfied with the negligible progress in the High Level Group during the last few years. It considers that Japan must make significant commitments on removing non-tariff barriers and obstacles to access to Japanese public procurement before negotiations are launched. Both the Council and Commission have noted that Japan’s capacity to remove regulatory barriers to trade is a precondition for launching negotiations on the EU-Japan FTA. The EU and Japan have generally low tariffs on goods with more than two thirds of the Union’s export value to Japan being duty-free and more than one third of Japan’s export value to the EU, but despite these low tariffs, bilateral trade volumes between the EU and Japan lag behind the bulk of the EU's trade exchanges with its other main trading partners, mostly because of the negative effects of Japanese non-tariff barriers (NTBs) on market access opportunities for European businesses . Members further note that a study in 2009 estimates that the trade costs associated with non-tariff barriers are higher than the existing tariff levels and that most of the potential economic gains reside in the removal of those NTB, and also estimates potential increases in EU exports to Japan of EUR 43 billion and EUR 53 for Japanese exports to the EU if tariffs and non-tariff measures are reduced to their fullest possible extent. Accordingly, Parliament considers that, in trade negotiations with Japan, the Commission should concentrate, as one of its priorities, on removing those barriers and obstacles that are of greatest hindrance to market access for European SMEs. The reduction or elimination of Japanese tariffs on ICT products, including their parts and components, would step up competitiveness and generate new high-quality jobs in the EU. Parliament calls, in addition, for intensified mutual cooperation between the EU and Japan in the field of R&D and especially on IPR enforcement to accelerate the sharing of information on patents between the respective patent offices. It considers that the Commission's level of ambition in respect of the EU-Japan FTA, and especially increasing market access for European businesses, should be complemented by jointly agreed comprehensive sustainable development commitments . Furthermore a comprehensive sustainability and impact assessment is paramount to an overall assessment of EU-Japan trade relations. Members ask the Commission to present such an assessment in due time, detailing in particular the possible advantages and disadvantages of reinforced trading relations between the EU and Japan for all sectors involved, and in particular for all industrial sectors and those which are more sensitive, such as the automotive, electronics, aviation and machinery sectors. Lastly, they recommends that effective bilateral safeguard measures be included in the design of an EU-Japan FTA to prevent a surge in imports that would cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to EU and Japanese industry, especially in sensitive sectors such as the automotive, electronics, aviation and machinery industries.
    • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 128-p5
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
      New
      6.20.03
      Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations
      procedure/subtype
      Old
      Debate or resolution on oral questions
      New
      Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
      activities
      • date: 2011-05-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110509&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
      • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20078&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-225 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0225/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
          reference
          2011/2625(RSP)
          title
          Resolution on EU-Japan trade relations
          geographical_area
          Japan
          stage_reached
          Procedure completed
          subtype
          Debate or resolution on oral questions
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject
          6.20.03 Bilateral economic and trade agreements and relations