BETA


2012/2260(INL) Better governance for the single market

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead IMCO SCHWAB Andreas (icon: PPE PPE) COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano (icon: S&D S&D), MANDERS Antonius (icon: ALDE ALDE), MCCLARKIN Emma (icon: ECR ECR), SALVINI Matteo (icon: EFD EFD)
Committee Opinion EMPL MCINTYRE Anthea (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion JURI
Committee Opinion REGI VLASÁK Oldřich (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion TRAN
Committee Opinion ECON
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47

Events

2013/06/28
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/02/07
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/02/07
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on the governance of the Single Market, in response to a Commission communication on the subject.

Members recall that 20 years after its official creation, the Single Market has not yet been fully completed, primarily because Member States have not fully transposed or implemented the approximately 1500 directives and around 1000 regulations. Concrete actions, both at Member State and Union level, are still necessary to fully implement freedom of movement for goods, persons, services and capital in the Union.

This is why Parliament requests the Commission to submit as soon as possible, whilst considering as the possible legal basis all relevant provisions of the TFEU relating to the internal market, including Article 26(3) TFEU, a proposal for an act aimed at strengthening the governance of the Single Market in regard to the following:.

Legislation: better evaluating the impacts:

strengthen the coordination inside the Commission, better evaluate the need for new instruments and hence improve the coherence before a legislative act is proposed; opt for regulations instead of directives, wherever appropriate; introduce a ‘ Single Market Test ’ to measure the impact of new legislation at national level on the Single Market; consider the feasibility of the extension of the scope of Directive 98/34/EC (‘Notification Directive’) to other sectors.

Better transposition and implementation:

each Member State should transpose every directive in a consistent manner and adopt all transposition measures relating to the whole of a Union legislative act jointly and at the same time; make greater use of correlation tables to ensure greater transparency of implementation and uniform application of Union law in the Member States; governance of the internal market could benefit from increased and enhanced exchanges of experience and best practices between civil servants at Union and national level; beyond mere statistical assessments, there is the need for a qualitative evaluation of implementation which allow to consider which measures have a particular impact and economic relevance for the Single Market; it is pertinent to distinguish between non-transposition, which is a clearly identifiable failure by the Member State, and non-conformity with Union law, which is a case of a different understanding of the underlying legislative act; Parliament should be provided annually with a list of non-transposed or incorrectly transposed Union legislation in the Member States concerned.

Better enforcement:

there should be a ‘zero tolerance’ policy in relation to Member States that do not implement the rules of the Single Market properly; faster procedures within the Commission and, where appropriate, recourse to interim proceedings before the Court of Justice , in accordance with Article 279 TFEU, should be applied more actively; the Commission should promote the use of the ‘EU Pilot’ and further improve its effectiveness, in order to better detect and correct infringements of Single Market rules; the Commission should offer a more extensive use of ‘EU sweeps’ to Member States in order to facilitate surveillance, in particular by less-equipped and less-prepared national authorities.

Key areas: setting priorities: Members recommend a stronger focus on a limited number of instruments and actions in order to achieve tangible improvements in the application of Single Market rules. They consider that the digital Single Market, the services sector, the energy sector, public procurement, research and innovation, as well as consumer protection and increased mobility of citizens, in particular workers and professionals, figure among the most important key areas for growth.

The resolution insists on the need to take further steps towards a regulation of financial services to ensure adequate information and protection for consumers and the transparent assessment of financial products, particularly the risky ones. They also emphasise that a properly functioning and fully completed Single Market cannot be effective without a single, interconnected and efficient European transport system .

An internal market for all stakeholders:

a stronger and earlier involvement of the social partners, civil society and all other stakeholders in designing, adopting, implementing and monitoring the measures needed to boost growth and citizens' rights in the Single Market, based also on forms of online participation and e-democracy, is essential to restoring confidence in the Single Market; the Single Market strategy should strengthen social welfare, convergence and workers’ rights, prevent social dumping and ensure fair working conditions for all Europeans.

European Semester: the evaluation of the state of the Single Market should become an integral part of the European Semester, with a Single Market Governance pillar being put in place alongside the Economic Governance pillar. Parliament considers that the Commission’s proposal to prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market contributing to the evidence base underpinning country-specific recommendations could lay the foundation for a future annual Single Market cycle within the European Semester.

Recommendations: the resolution contains a series of detailed recommendations concerning the content of the proposal: (i) establish a consistent framework for the governance of the Single Market; (ii) determine the Union’s objectives and priorities for action in order to improve the operation of the Single Market; (iii) determine the conditions to be ensured to ensure Single Market governance; (iv) define supplementary measures necessary to enhance the implementation and enforcement of the Single Market regulatory framework; (v) provide for the submission, assessment and monitoring of national action plans; (vi) provide for the formulation of distinct Single Market-related country-specific recommendations; (vii) define a Single Market pillar of the European Semester; (viii) increase the democratic accountability and the role of the European Parliament and of national parliaments.

Documents
2013/02/07
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/02/05
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/01/28
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted a report by Andreas SCHWAB (EPP, DE) with recommendations to the Commission on the governance of the Single Market (Initiative – Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure).

Noting that 20 years after its official creation, the Single Market has not yet been fully completed, Members request the Commission to submit as soon as possible, whilst considering as the possible legal basis all relevant provisions of the TFEU relating to the internal market, including Article 26(3) TFEU, a proposal for an act aimed at strengthening the governance of the Single Market . The report contains a series of detailed recommendations concerning the following:

Legislation: better evaluating the impacts:

strengthen the coordination inside the Commission, better evaluate the need for new instruments and hence improve the coherence before a legislative act is proposed; opt for regulations instead of directives, wherever appropriate; introduce a ‘ Single Market Test ’ to measure the impact of new legislation at national level on the Single Market; consider the feasibility of the extension of the scope of Directive 98/34/EC (‘Notification Directive’) to other sectors.

Better transposition, implementation and enforcement:

each Member State should transpose every directive in a consistent manner and adopt all transposition measures relating to the whole of a Union legislative act jointly and at the same time; make greater use of correlation tables to ensure greater transparency of implementation and uniform application of Union law in the Member States; governance of the internal market could benefit from increased and enhanced exchanges of experience and best practices between civil servants at Union and national level; beyond mere statistical assessments, there is the need for a qualitative evaluation of implementation which allow to consider which measures have a particular impact and economic relevance for the Single Market; it is pertinent to distinguish between non-transposition, which is a clearly identifiable failure by the Member State, and non-conformity with Union law, which is a case of a different understanding of the underlying legislative act; Parliament should be provided annually with a list of non-transposed or incorrectly transposed Union legislation in the Member States concerned; in regard to enforcement, there should be a ‘zero tolerance’ policy in relation to Member States that do not implement the rules of the Single Market properly; the Commission should promote the use of the ‘EU Pilot’ and further improve its effectiveness, in order to better detect and correct infringements of Single Market rules; the Commission should offer a more extensive use of ‘EU sweeps’ to Member States in order to facilitate surveillance, in particular by less-equipped and less-prepared national authorities.

Key areas: setting priorities: Members recommend a stronger focus on a limited number of instruments and actions in order to achieve tangible improvements in the application of Single Market rules. They consider that the digital Single Market, the services sector, the energy sector, public procurement, research and innovation, as well as consumer protection and increased mobility of citizens, in particular workers and professionals, figure among the most important key areas for growth.

The report insists on the need to take further steps towards a regulation of financial services to ensure adequate information and protection for consumers and the transparent assessment of financial products, particularly the risky ones. They also emphasise that a properly functioning and fully completed Single Market cannot be effective without a single, interconnected and efficient European transport system .

In Members’ opinion, the Single Market strategy should strengthen social welfare, convergence and workers’ rights, prevent social dumping and ensure fair working conditions for all Europeans.

European Semester: the evaluation of the state of the Single Market should become an integral part of the European Semester, with a Single Market Governance pillar being put in place alongside the Economic Governance pillar. Members consider that the Commission’s proposal to prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market contributing to the evidence base underpinning country-specific recommendations could lay the foundation for a future annual Single Market cycle within the European Semester.

Documents
2013/01/23
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/01/22
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2013/01/22
   CSL - Council Meeting
2013/01/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/12/19
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2012/12/06
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/11/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2012/11/07
   EP - MCINTYRE Anthea (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2012/10/25
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2012/10/16
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2012/09/18
   EP - VLASÁK Oldřich (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2012/06/08
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: better governance for the Single Market.

CONTENT: the Single Market is a key driver for economic growth . However, to reap the benefits it brings, its rules must be properly implemented and enforced , and the situation today demonstrates that there is much room for improvement. It has been calculated by some that a more efficient transposition of EU legislation could reduce administrative burdens by one third, leading to an overall cost saving of nearly 40 billion euro.

The March 2012 European Council recognised the need to strengthen the governance of the Single Market and to improve its implementation and enforcement. Similar calls have been made by the European Parliament in its resolution of 20 May 2010 and 6 April 2011 .

In response, the Commission calls for a renewed commitment to make the Single Market effectively deliver for growth. In particular, it proposes:

· a particularly ambitious course of action to make swift progress in key areas with the greatest growth potential;

· concrete measures to further improve the Single Market 'governance cycle', i.e., the way Single Market rules are designed, implemented, applied and enforced.

Focus on key areas: based on an analysis of today's European economy, attention in 2012-2013 should, in the Commission's view, focus on key services sectors and the network industries. Within the services sector, particular attention should be given to wholesale and retail trade, business services, construction and financial intermediation services. Further, much could be gained from a better functioning digital Single Market and a stronger Single Market in the energy and transport sector. The Communication sets out in detail how these key areas have been selected and which legislative acts should receive special attention in these areas. To make swift progress in these key areas, the Commission: (i) sets out the special efforts needed to ensure that rules are properly implemented and (ii) proposes to make use of the European semester process to monitor how the Single Market functions in these areas and define new actions, at both EU and national level, as follows:

1) Set ambitious targets to ensure proper implementation:

In recent years, important pieces of legislation have been adopted in key areas such as Directive 2006/123/EC (the Services Directive) and the report stresses the need to make them work in practice. To this end, the Commission and Member State s should join forces to ensure swift transposition and effective implementation of rules.

For Directives that are yet to be transposed , the Commission will enhance its transposition assistance. For instance, it will engage in informal contacts with national officials on a bilateral basis and set up expert groups and provide on-line fora to discuss and exchange best practices amongst national experts, as early as possible in the transposition process. It will conduct systematic conformity checks and will take supportive measures to make rules work in practice across the Member States.

Member States , in turn, should:

· informally submit to the Commission specific aspects of draft transposition measures, where they or the Commission consider it appropriate, in order to make the Commission's assistance as effective as possible during the transposition period and to secure rapid implementation;

· commit to ‘ zero tolerance ’ when it comes to transposition of directives, i.e. respecting a transposition deficit target and a conformity deficit target of 0%;

· provide an on-line explanation of how they have transposed rules and how these rules work in practice.

As regards Regulations, the Commission will also step up efforts to secure proper implementation. In addition, f or legislation that has been transposed and implemented for some time , the Commission will conduct in-depth reviews to see how rules are implemented and work in practice, not only in legal but also in practical and economic terms. In this context, it may propose peer review exercises.

Where problems persist, the Commission will use its enforcement powers with the utmost vigour and calls on Member States to co-operate with it to ensure that breaches of EU law are swiftly brought to an end.

2) Monitor and define remedial action in the European semester process: the Commission will prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market , which will present an analysis of the state of Single Market integration and look at the way the Single Market functions in practice, in particular in key areas and for key market actors, including businesses and consumers. To the maximum extent, it will measure how well the Single Market functions in these areas by making use of concrete benchmarks.

On this basis, the Commission will identify the main policy challenges and set priorities for action for the coming year at both EU and national level. Actions may include both legislative and non-legislative initiatives. Particular attention will be given to minimising burdens for SMEs. Where necessary, assessments will go beyond existing rules with the view to exploiting the full potential of the Single Market, in particular by promoting best practices.

The annual report will be part of the Annual Growth Survey, to be discussed by the Council and the European Parliament and be endorsed by the Spring European Council. It will contribute to the definition of country-specific recommendations , which will be based on a more in-depth analysis of performance in each Member State, in the context of the European semester process.

Effectiveness: to make the Single Market work more effectively, the Commission recommends making better use of IT tools to empower citizens and businesses. It calls on Member States to:

strengthen problem-solving tools ; provide user-friendly information on how rules work in practice within their territories;

· establish a network of national 'Single Market centres' to monitor and oversee efforts to improve the functioning of the Single Market, and detect problems and obstacles to an effective functioning of the Single Market in their countries;

· ensure that administrations needing to communicate with each other are linked up electronically ;

· ensure effective first-line help centres exist at the national level where businesses and citizens can turn to when encountering problems in the Single Market ('second-generation SOLVIT centres');

· ensure fast and effective redress is available for all Single-Market related problems.

The Commission will work in partnership with Member States to support them in this, and in addition to the other actions under the Communication, and will provide a first report on the integration of the Single Market and the implementation of the Communication as part of the Annual Growth Survey 2013.

2012/06/08
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: better governance for the Single Market.

CONTENT: the Single Market is a key driver for economic growth . However, to reap the benefits it brings, its rules must be properly implemented and enforced , and the situation today demonstrates that there is much room for improvement. It has been calculated by some that a more efficient transposition of EU legislation could reduce administrative burdens by one third, leading to an overall cost saving of nearly 40 billion euro.

The March 2012 European Council recognised the need to strengthen the governance of the Single Market and to improve its implementation and enforcement. Similar calls have been made by the European Parliament in its resolution of 20 May 2010 and 6 April 2011 .

In response, the Commission calls for a renewed commitment to make the Single Market effectively deliver for growth. In particular, it proposes:

· a particularly ambitious course of action to make swift progress in key areas with the greatest growth potential;

· concrete measures to further improve the Single Market 'governance cycle', i.e., the way Single Market rules are designed, implemented, applied and enforced.

Focus on key areas: based on an analysis of today's European economy, attention in 2012-2013 should, in the Commission's view, focus on key services sectors and the network industries. Within the services sector, particular attention should be given to wholesale and retail trade, business services, construction and financial intermediation services. Further, much could be gained from a better functioning digital Single Market and a stronger Single Market in the energy and transport sector. The Communication sets out in detail how these key areas have been selected and which legislative acts should receive special attention in these areas. To make swift progress in these key areas, the Commission: (i) sets out the special efforts needed to ensure that rules are properly implemented and (ii) proposes to make use of the European semester process to monitor how the Single Market functions in these areas and define new actions, at both EU and national level, as follows:

1) Set ambitious targets to ensure proper implementation:

In recent years, important pieces of legislation have been adopted in key areas such as Directive 2006/123/EC (the Services Directive) and the report stresses the need to make them work in practice. To this end, the Commission and Member State s should join forces to ensure swift transposition and effective implementation of rules.

For Directives that are yet to be transposed , the Commission will enhance its transposition assistance. For instance, it will engage in informal contacts with national officials on a bilateral basis and set up expert groups and provide on-line fora to discuss and exchange best practices amongst national experts, as early as possible in the transposition process. It will conduct systematic conformity checks and will take supportive measures to make rules work in practice across the Member States.

Member States , in turn, should:

· informally submit to the Commission specific aspects of draft transposition measures, where they or the Commission consider it appropriate, in order to make the Commission's assistance as effective as possible during the transposition period and to secure rapid implementation;

· commit to ‘ zero tolerance ’ when it comes to transposition of directives, i.e. respecting a transposition deficit target and a conformity deficit target of 0%;

· provide an on-line explanation of how they have transposed rules and how these rules work in practice.

As regards Regulations, the Commission will also step up efforts to secure proper implementation. In addition, f or legislation that has been transposed and implemented for some time , the Commission will conduct in-depth reviews to see how rules are implemented and work in practice, not only in legal but also in practical and economic terms. In this context, it may propose peer review exercises.

Where problems persist, the Commission will use its enforcement powers with the utmost vigour and calls on Member States to co-operate with it to ensure that breaches of EU law are swiftly brought to an end.

2) Monitor and define remedial action in the European semester process: the Commission will prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market , which will present an analysis of the state of Single Market integration and look at the way the Single Market functions in practice, in particular in key areas and for key market actors, including businesses and consumers. To the maximum extent, it will measure how well the Single Market functions in these areas by making use of concrete benchmarks.

On this basis, the Commission will identify the main policy challenges and set priorities for action for the coming year at both EU and national level. Actions may include both legislative and non-legislative initiatives. Particular attention will be given to minimising burdens for SMEs. Where necessary, assessments will go beyond existing rules with the view to exploiting the full potential of the Single Market, in particular by promoting best practices.

The annual report will be part of the Annual Growth Survey, to be discussed by the Council and the European Parliament and be endorsed by the Spring European Council. It will contribute to the definition of country-specific recommendations , which will be based on a more in-depth analysis of performance in each Member State, in the context of the European semester process.

Effectiveness: to make the Single Market work more effectively, the Commission recommends making better use of IT tools to empower citizens and businesses. It calls on Member States to:

strengthen problem-solving tools ; provide user-friendly information on how rules work in practice within their territories;

· establish a network of national 'Single Market centres' to monitor and oversee efforts to improve the functioning of the Single Market, and detect problems and obstacles to an effective functioning of the Single Market in their countries;

· ensure that administrations needing to communicate with each other are linked up electronically ;

· ensure effective first-line help centres exist at the national level where businesses and citizens can turn to when encountering problems in the Single Market ('second-generation SOLVIT centres');

· ensure fast and effective redress is available for all Single-Market related problems.

The Commission will work in partnership with Member States to support them in this, and in addition to the other actions under the Communication, and will provide a first report on the integration of the Single Market and the implementation of the Communication as part of the Annual Growth Survey 2013.

2012/05/08
   EP - SCHWAB Andreas (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0019/2013 - Andreas Schwab - Am 2 #

2013/02/07 Outcome: -: 546, +: 36, 0: 13
EL MT CY LV EE LU FI LT SI IE DK NL HU SK AT BG SE PT BE CZ IT RO GB PL ES FR DE
Total
16
1
2
7
5
6
9
9
7
9
11
25
13
12
17
16
18
20
18
21
41
27
49
45
45
60
85
icon: NI NI
23

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

1

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Greece EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom EFD

5

France EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (2)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: ECR ECR
37

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
54

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
4

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3
icon: S&D S&D
145

Malta S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

3

Hungary S&D

Against (2)

2
icon: PPE PPE
212

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Ireland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

3

Czechia PPE

2

A7-0019/2013 - Andreas Schwab - Am 4 #

2013/02/07 Outcome: -: 338, +: 247, 0: 9
EL ES DK CY AT IT SE CZ MT IE PT LV BE FI LU LT SI EE FR SK HU BG NL DE RO GB PL
Total
16
45
11
3
17
42
18
21
1
10
20
6
18
9
6
9
7
5
56
12
14
16
25
85
27
49
45
icon: S&D S&D
148

Malta S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Greece EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

France EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
37

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Greece ALDE

1

Spain ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

3
3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

France ALDE

Against (1)

4

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3
icon: PPE PPE
214

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A7-0019/2013 - Andreas Schwab - Am 5 #

2013/02/07 Outcome: -: 329, +: 247, 0: 10
EL AT DK IT CY SE BE MT PT CZ LV NL ES FI FR LU LT SI EE IE SK BG HU DE RO GB PL
Total
15
17
10
40
2
18
19
1
20
20
6
23
43
9
58
6
9
7
5
10
12
16
13
86
27
48
45
icon: S&D S&D
144

Cyprus S&D

1

Malta S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
53

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
22

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

4
icon: EFD EFD
25

Greece EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
35

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
69

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Italy ALDE

4

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2
3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3
icon: PPE PPE
211

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A7-0019/2013 - Andreas Schwab - Am 1 #

2013/02/07 Outcome: -: 505, +: 76, 0: 5
MT CZ LT CY NL LV EE DK LU FI SI SK IE HU AT EL BE BG GB SE PT PL IT RO ES FR DE
Total
1
21
9
3
25
7
5
10
6
9
7
12
10
14
15
16
16
14
48
18
19
45
40
26
45
59
85
icon: ECR ECR
36

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

2

Belgium EFD

For (1)

1

France EFD

1
icon: NI NI
22

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

4

Spain NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (2)

4

Spain GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
70

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
144

Malta S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1
2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

3

Hungary S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
209

Czechia PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

A7-0019/2013 - Andreas Schwab - Am 8 #

2013/02/07 Outcome: -: 338, +: 249, 0: 2
IT DK CY AT EL SE FR CZ ES MT PT LV BE SI LU FI LT EE NL IE SK HU BG DE RO GB PL
Total
42
11
3
17
16
17
57
21
45
1
20
7
19
6
6
8
9
5
24
10
12
14
16
84
27
47
44
icon: S&D S&D
147

Greece S&D

Against (1)

4

Malta S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Hungary S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
54

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Spain Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
25

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
26

Denmark EFD

1

Greece EFD

2

France EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Against (1)

1

Finland EFD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

France NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Belgium NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

2

Bulgaria NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
35

Denmark ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Hungary ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
71

Denmark ALDE

2

Greece ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2
3

Slovakia ALDE

Against (1)

1
3
icon: PPE PPE
207

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Czechia PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

A7-0019/2013 - Andreas Schwab - Résolution #

2013/02/07 Outcome: +: 527, 0: 31, -: 30
DE FR PL ES IT GB RO BE CZ BG PT SE HU AT NL SK IE DK LT FI EL SI LV LU EE MT CY
Total
85
58
45
43
42
48
27
19
21
16
19
17
14
16
24
12
10
11
9
9
13
7
7
6
5
1
3
icon: PPE PPE
206

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
147

Hungary S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
72

Slovakia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Greece ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

Spain Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Sweden Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
36

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
25

France EFD

Against (1)

1

Belgium EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
23

France NI

Against (1)

1

Spain NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Belgium NI

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
26

France GUE/NGL

2

Spain GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (2)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Greece GUE/NGL

2

Latvia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2012-06-08T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf
events/5/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-02-05-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/3
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.937
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-497937_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.429
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-500429_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.938
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-501938_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.431&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-500431_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.480&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-500480_EN.html
events/0/docs/1/url
Old
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=259
New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=0259
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/3/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/4
date
2013-01-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0019_EN.html title: A7-0019/2013
summary
events/4
date
2013-01-28T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0019_EN.html title: A7-0019/2013
summary
events/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130205&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/7
date
2013-02-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: T7-0054/2013
summary
events/7
date
2013-02-07T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0054_EN.html title: T7-0054/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 47
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 46
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas date: 2012-05-08T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2012-05-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: MCINTYRE Anthea date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2012-11-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCINTYRE Anthea group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: VLASÁK Oldřich date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2012-09-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
docs/5/body
EC
events/0
date
2012-06-08T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/0
date
2012-06-08T00:00:00
type
Non-legislative basic document published
body
EC
docs
summary
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-19&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0019_EN.html
events/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-54
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0054_EN.html
committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
4560
activities
  • date: 2012-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0259 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0259:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3215 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3215*&MEET_DATE=22/01/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3215 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2013-01-22T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2013-01-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-19&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0019/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130205&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22524&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-54 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0054/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BARNIER Michel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2012-05-08T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: SCHWAB Andreas group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2012-11-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2012-11-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MCINTYRE Anthea group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
IMCO
date
2012-05-08T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2012-09-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VLASÁK Oldřich group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2012-09-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
council
  • body: CSL type: Council Meeting council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN meeting_id: 3215 url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3215*&MEET_DATE=22/01/2013 date: 2013-01-22T00:00:00
docs
  • date: 2012-10-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE497.937 title: PE497.937 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2012-11-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.429 title: PE500.429 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2012-12-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE501.938 title: PE501.938 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2012-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.431&secondRef=02 title: PE500.431 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.480&secondRef=02 title: PE500.480 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-06-28T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=22524&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)304 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2012-06-08T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0259 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=0259 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: better governance for the Single Market. CONTENT: the Single Market is a key driver for economic growth . However, to reap the benefits it brings, its rules must be properly implemented and enforced , and the situation today demonstrates that there is much room for improvement. It has been calculated by some that a more efficient transposition of EU legislation could reduce administrative burdens by one third, leading to an overall cost saving of nearly 40 billion euro. The March 2012 European Council recognised the need to strengthen the governance of the Single Market and to improve its implementation and enforcement. Similar calls have been made by the European Parliament in its resolution of 20 May 2010 and 6 April 2011 . In response, the Commission calls for a renewed commitment to make the Single Market effectively deliver for growth. In particular, it proposes: · a particularly ambitious course of action to make swift progress in key areas with the greatest growth potential; · concrete measures to further improve the Single Market 'governance cycle', i.e., the way Single Market rules are designed, implemented, applied and enforced. Focus on key areas: based on an analysis of today's European economy, attention in 2012-2013 should, in the Commission's view, focus on key services sectors and the network industries. Within the services sector, particular attention should be given to wholesale and retail trade, business services, construction and financial intermediation services. Further, much could be gained from a better functioning digital Single Market and a stronger Single Market in the energy and transport sector. The Communication sets out in detail how these key areas have been selected and which legislative acts should receive special attention in these areas. To make swift progress in these key areas, the Commission: (i) sets out the special efforts needed to ensure that rules are properly implemented and (ii) proposes to make use of the European semester process to monitor how the Single Market functions in these areas and define new actions, at both EU and national level, as follows: 1) Set ambitious targets to ensure proper implementation: In recent years, important pieces of legislation have been adopted in key areas such as Directive 2006/123/EC (the Services Directive) and the report stresses the need to make them work in practice. To this end, the Commission and Member State s should join forces to ensure swift transposition and effective implementation of rules. For Directives that are yet to be transposed , the Commission will enhance its transposition assistance. For instance, it will engage in informal contacts with national officials on a bilateral basis and set up expert groups and provide on-line fora to discuss and exchange best practices amongst national experts, as early as possible in the transposition process. It will conduct systematic conformity checks and will take supportive measures to make rules work in practice across the Member States. Member States , in turn, should: · informally submit to the Commission specific aspects of draft transposition measures, where they or the Commission consider it appropriate, in order to make the Commission's assistance as effective as possible during the transposition period and to secure rapid implementation; · commit to ‘ zero tolerance ’ when it comes to transposition of directives, i.e. respecting a transposition deficit target and a conformity deficit target of 0%; · provide an on-line explanation of how they have transposed rules and how these rules work in practice. As regards Regulations, the Commission will also step up efforts to secure proper implementation. In addition, f or legislation that has been transposed and implemented for some time , the Commission will conduct in-depth reviews to see how rules are implemented and work in practice, not only in legal but also in practical and economic terms. In this context, it may propose peer review exercises. Where problems persist, the Commission will use its enforcement powers with the utmost vigour and calls on Member States to co-operate with it to ensure that breaches of EU law are swiftly brought to an end. 2) Monitor and define remedial action in the European semester process: the Commission will prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market , which will present an analysis of the state of Single Market integration and look at the way the Single Market functions in practice, in particular in key areas and for key market actors, including businesses and consumers. To the maximum extent, it will measure how well the Single Market functions in these areas by making use of concrete benchmarks. On this basis, the Commission will identify the main policy challenges and set priorities for action for the coming year at both EU and national level. Actions may include both legislative and non-legislative initiatives. Particular attention will be given to minimising burdens for SMEs. Where necessary, assessments will go beyond existing rules with the view to exploiting the full potential of the Single Market, in particular by promoting best practices. The annual report will be part of the Annual Growth Survey, to be discussed by the Council and the European Parliament and be endorsed by the Spring European Council. It will contribute to the definition of country-specific recommendations , which will be based on a more in-depth analysis of performance in each Member State, in the context of the European semester process. Effectiveness: to make the Single Market work more effectively, the Commission recommends making better use of IT tools to empower citizens and businesses. It calls on Member States to: strengthen problem-solving tools ; provide user-friendly information on how rules work in practice within their territories; · establish a network of national 'Single Market centres' to monitor and oversee efforts to improve the functioning of the Single Market, and detect problems and obstacles to an effective functioning of the Single Market in their countries; · ensure that administrations needing to communicate with each other are linked up electronically ; · ensure effective first-line help centres exist at the national level where businesses and citizens can turn to when encountering problems in the Single Market ('second-generation SOLVIT centres'); · ensure fast and effective redress is available for all Single-Market related problems. The Commission will work in partnership with Member States to support them in this, and in addition to the other actions under the Communication, and will provide a first report on the integration of the Single Market and the implementation of the Communication as part of the Annual Growth Survey 2013.
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Council body: CSL docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3215*&MEET_DATE=22/01/2013 title: 3215
  • date: 2013-01-23T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-01-28T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-19&language=EN title: A7-0019/2013 summary: The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted a report by Andreas SCHWAB (EPP, DE) with recommendations to the Commission on the governance of the Single Market (Initiative – Rule 42 of the Rules of Procedure). Noting that 20 years after its official creation, the Single Market has not yet been fully completed, Members request the Commission to submit as soon as possible, whilst considering as the possible legal basis all relevant provisions of the TFEU relating to the internal market, including Article 26(3) TFEU, a proposal for an act aimed at strengthening the governance of the Single Market . The report contains a series of detailed recommendations concerning the following: Legislation: better evaluating the impacts: strengthen the coordination inside the Commission, better evaluate the need for new instruments and hence improve the coherence before a legislative act is proposed; opt for regulations instead of directives, wherever appropriate; introduce a ‘ Single Market Test ’ to measure the impact of new legislation at national level on the Single Market; consider the feasibility of the extension of the scope of Directive 98/34/EC (‘Notification Directive’) to other sectors. Better transposition, implementation and enforcement: each Member State should transpose every directive in a consistent manner and adopt all transposition measures relating to the whole of a Union legislative act jointly and at the same time; make greater use of correlation tables to ensure greater transparency of implementation and uniform application of Union law in the Member States; governance of the internal market could benefit from increased and enhanced exchanges of experience and best practices between civil servants at Union and national level; beyond mere statistical assessments, there is the need for a qualitative evaluation of implementation which allow to consider which measures have a particular impact and economic relevance for the Single Market; it is pertinent to distinguish between non-transposition, which is a clearly identifiable failure by the Member State, and non-conformity with Union law, which is a case of a different understanding of the underlying legislative act; Parliament should be provided annually with a list of non-transposed or incorrectly transposed Union legislation in the Member States concerned; in regard to enforcement, there should be a ‘zero tolerance’ policy in relation to Member States that do not implement the rules of the Single Market properly; the Commission should promote the use of the ‘EU Pilot’ and further improve its effectiveness, in order to better detect and correct infringements of Single Market rules; the Commission should offer a more extensive use of ‘EU sweeps’ to Member States in order to facilitate surveillance, in particular by less-equipped and less-prepared national authorities. Key areas: setting priorities: Members recommend a stronger focus on a limited number of instruments and actions in order to achieve tangible improvements in the application of Single Market rules. They consider that the digital Single Market, the services sector, the energy sector, public procurement, research and innovation, as well as consumer protection and increased mobility of citizens, in particular workers and professionals, figure among the most important key areas for growth. The report insists on the need to take further steps towards a regulation of financial services to ensure adequate information and protection for consumers and the transparent assessment of financial products, particularly the risky ones. They also emphasise that a properly functioning and fully completed Single Market cannot be effective without a single, interconnected and efficient European transport system . In Members’ opinion, the Single Market strategy should strengthen social welfare, convergence and workers’ rights, prevent social dumping and ensure fair working conditions for all Europeans. European Semester: the evaluation of the state of the Single Market should become an integral part of the European Semester, with a Single Market Governance pillar being put in place alongside the Economic Governance pillar. Members consider that the Commission’s proposal to prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market contributing to the evidence base underpinning country-specific recommendations could lay the foundation for a future annual Single Market cycle within the European Semester.
  • date: 2013-02-05T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130205&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22524&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-54 title: T7-0054/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on the governance of the Single Market, in response to a Commission communication on the subject. Members recall that 20 years after its official creation, the Single Market has not yet been fully completed, primarily because Member States have not fully transposed or implemented the approximately 1500 directives and around 1000 regulations. Concrete actions, both at Member State and Union level, are still necessary to fully implement freedom of movement for goods, persons, services and capital in the Union. This is why Parliament requests the Commission to submit as soon as possible, whilst considering as the possible legal basis all relevant provisions of the TFEU relating to the internal market, including Article 26(3) TFEU, a proposal for an act aimed at strengthening the governance of the Single Market in regard to the following:. Legislation: better evaluating the impacts: strengthen the coordination inside the Commission, better evaluate the need for new instruments and hence improve the coherence before a legislative act is proposed; opt for regulations instead of directives, wherever appropriate; introduce a ‘ Single Market Test ’ to measure the impact of new legislation at national level on the Single Market; consider the feasibility of the extension of the scope of Directive 98/34/EC (‘Notification Directive’) to other sectors. Better transposition and implementation: each Member State should transpose every directive in a consistent manner and adopt all transposition measures relating to the whole of a Union legislative act jointly and at the same time; make greater use of correlation tables to ensure greater transparency of implementation and uniform application of Union law in the Member States; governance of the internal market could benefit from increased and enhanced exchanges of experience and best practices between civil servants at Union and national level; beyond mere statistical assessments, there is the need for a qualitative evaluation of implementation which allow to consider which measures have a particular impact and economic relevance for the Single Market; it is pertinent to distinguish between non-transposition, which is a clearly identifiable failure by the Member State, and non-conformity with Union law, which is a case of a different understanding of the underlying legislative act; Parliament should be provided annually with a list of non-transposed or incorrectly transposed Union legislation in the Member States concerned. Better enforcement: there should be a ‘zero tolerance’ policy in relation to Member States that do not implement the rules of the Single Market properly; faster procedures within the Commission and, where appropriate, recourse to interim proceedings before the Court of Justice , in accordance with Article 279 TFEU, should be applied more actively; the Commission should promote the use of the ‘EU Pilot’ and further improve its effectiveness, in order to better detect and correct infringements of Single Market rules; the Commission should offer a more extensive use of ‘EU sweeps’ to Member States in order to facilitate surveillance, in particular by less-equipped and less-prepared national authorities. Key areas: setting priorities: Members recommend a stronger focus on a limited number of instruments and actions in order to achieve tangible improvements in the application of Single Market rules. They consider that the digital Single Market, the services sector, the energy sector, public procurement, research and innovation, as well as consumer protection and increased mobility of citizens, in particular workers and professionals, figure among the most important key areas for growth. The resolution insists on the need to take further steps towards a regulation of financial services to ensure adequate information and protection for consumers and the transparent assessment of financial products, particularly the risky ones. They also emphasise that a properly functioning and fully completed Single Market cannot be effective without a single, interconnected and efficient European transport system . An internal market for all stakeholders: a stronger and earlier involvement of the social partners, civil society and all other stakeholders in designing, adopting, implementing and monitoring the measures needed to boost growth and citizens' rights in the Single Market, based also on forms of online participation and e-democracy, is essential to restoring confidence in the Single Market; the Single Market strategy should strengthen social welfare, convergence and workers’ rights, prevent social dumping and ensure fair working conditions for all Europeans. European Semester: the evaluation of the state of the Single Market should become an integral part of the European Semester, with a Single Market Governance pillar being put in place alongside the Economic Governance pillar. Parliament considers that the Commission’s proposal to prepare an annual report on the integration of the Single Market contributing to the evidence base underpinning country-specific recommendations could lay the foundation for a future annual Single Market cycle within the European Semester. Recommendations: the resolution contains a series of detailed recommendations concerning the content of the proposal: (i) establish a consistent framework for the governance of the Single Market; (ii) determine the Union’s objectives and priorities for action in order to improve the operation of the Single Market; (iii) determine the conditions to be ensured to ensure Single Market governance; (iv) define supplementary measures necessary to enhance the implementation and enforcement of the Single Market regulatory framework; (v) provide for the submission, assessment and monitoring of national action plans; (vi) provide for the formulation of distinct Single Market-related country-specific recommendations; (vii) define a Single Market pillar of the European Semester; (viii) increase the democratic accountability and the role of the European Parliament and of national parliaments.
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
IMCO/7/10631
New
  • IMCO/7/10631
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 46
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
procedure/subject
Old
  • 2 Internal market, single market
  • 8.50.01 Implementation of EU law
New
2
Internal market, single market
8.50.01
Implementation of EU law
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0259:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0259:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf
procedure/subject/0
Old
2 Internal market, SLIM
New
2 Internal market, single market
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/3/committees/2/shadows/3/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
committees/2/shadows/3/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities
  • date: 2012-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0259/COM_COM(2012)0259_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0259:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0259 body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2012-10-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • body: CSL meeting_id: 3215 docs: url: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=SMPL&ROWSPP=25&RESULTSET=1&NRROWS=500&DOC_LANCD=EN&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC&CONTENTS=3215*&MEET_DATE=22/01/2013 type: Debate in Council title: 3215 council: Economic and Financial Affairs ECOFIN date: 2013-01-22T00:00:00 type: Council Meeting
  • date: 2013-01-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
  • date: 2013-01-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-19&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0019/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-02-05T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20130205&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-02-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=22524&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-54 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0054/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2012-11-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: ECR name: MCINTYRE Anthea
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano group: ALDE name: MANDERS Toine group: ECR name: MCCLARKIN Emma group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-05-08T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: PPE name: SCHWAB Andreas
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Legal Affairs committee: JURI
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2012-09-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ECR name: VLASÁK Oldřich
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
IMCO/7/10631
reference
2012/2260(INL)
title
Better governance for the single market
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Request for legislative proposal
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INL - Legislative initiative procedure
subject