Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | INTA | MOREIRA Vital ( S&D) | QUISTHOUDT-ROWOHL Godelieve ( PPE), SCHAAKE Marietje ( ALDE), BOVÉ José ( Verts/ALE), STURDY Robert ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | DE CASTRO Paolo ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6a
Legal Basis:
TFEU 207, TFEU 218-p6aEvents
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States regarding the Importation of beef from animals not treated with growth-promoting hormones.
NON-LEGISLATIVE ACT : Council Decision 2014/44/EU on the conclusion of the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America regarding the importation of beef from animals not treated with certain growth-promoting hormones and increased duties applied by the United States to certain products of the European Union.
BACKGROUND: in accordance with Council Decision 2013/523/EU, the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America regarding the importation of beef from animals not treated with certain growth-promoting hormones and increased duties applied by the United States to certain products of the European Union, was signed on 21 October 2013, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
The revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) should now be approved.
CONTENT: with this Decision, the council, with the approval of Parliament, approves the revised Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the EU.
Objectives and scope : the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on ‘Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones)’ . These steps are grouped in three phases, opening with a tariff quota for "High Quality Beef", and the US, in exchange, reducing the level of sanctions applied to EU products.
The three steps are described in the MoU.
Quota management and monitoring : provision is made for administering the tariff rate quota in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994.
The United States and the EU:
· should monitor and review the operation of the MoU;
· upon the request of either Party, conduct additional bilateral consultations regarding the operation of the MoU, including issues of quota management.
Either the United States or the EU may withdraw from the MoU by providing written notice to the other Party.
The MoU defines what is meant by ‘High Quality Beef'. The indication 'High Quality Beef' may be added to the information on the label.
Disputes: provisions are made concerning the settlement of disputes as regards the implementation of the MoU.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 28.01.2014.
The European Parliament adopted a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union.
Parliament gave its consent to the conclusion of the revised Memorandum of Understanding.
The Committee on International Trade adopted the report by Vital MOREIRA (S&D, PT) on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament give its consent to the conclusion of the revised Memorandum of Understanding which would ensure legal certainty for economic operators and give additional time to reach a final negotiated solution. Extension of the Memorandum would allow to further strengthen good faith leading to increased economic integration across the Atlantic, promoting confidence during the on-going negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) .
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union.
LEGAL BASIS: the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union.
Subject matter and scope : the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC – Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones).
These steps are grouped in three phases . The ultimate aim is for the EU to increase the permitted amount of imported "high quality beef" from the United States and for the United States to reduce/suspend application of any additional import duties on EU products.
Three- phased system :
- Phase 1 (August 2009 - August 2012): the EU opened an autonomous erga omnes tariff quota for 20 000 tons of "High Quality Beef", and the US reduced the level of sanctions applied to EU products.
- Phase 2 (August 2012 - August 2013): the EU opened a larger quota for 45 000 tons of High Quality Beef, and the US suspended all trade sanctions on EU products resulting from the Hormones dispute.
The MoU foresees that, should the Parties not reach agreement to enter into Phase 3 by the expiry of Phase 2, the MoU would be considered terminated; however, its core obligations of opening a quota for high quality beef and suspending all trade sanctions remain in place for six more months.
At this time there is no agreement to enter into Phase 3, but the termination of the MoU is not in the EU or US interest. The Parties could agree to extend Phase 2 until August 2015, while they continue discussions on Phase 3.
- The amendment of the MoU also clarifies the elements of Phase 3 , should the Parties agree to enter into it at the end of the extended Phase 2. The rules of the MoU concerning the management of licenses are also amended to reflect the system of "first come, first served", introduced in 2012.
Quota management and monitoring the implementation of the Understanding : measures are laid down to regulate the management of quotas in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
The United States and the EU should:
monitor and review the operation of this Understanding; upon the request of either Party, conduct additional bilateral consultations regarding the operation of this Understanding, including issues of quota management.
Either the United States or the EU may withdraw from this Understanding by providing written notice to the other Party.
It should be noted that the Understanding includes clarifications on the meaning of ‘High Quality Beef’. The indication 'High Quality Beef' may be added to the information on the label.
Dispute settlements : provisions are set out which aim to resolve any dispute relating to the implementation of the Understanding.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union.
LEGAL BASIS: the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union.
Subject matter and scope : the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC – Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones).
These steps are grouped in three phases . The ultimate aim is for the EU to increase the permitted amount of imported "high quality beef" from the United States and for the United States to reduce/suspend application of any additional import duties on EU products.
Three- phased system :
- Phase 1 (August 2009 - August 2012): the EU opened an autonomous erga omnes tariff quota for 20 000 tons of "High Quality Beef", and the US reduced the level of sanctions applied to EU products.
- Phase 2 (August 2012 - August 2013): the EU opened a larger quota for 45 000 tons of High Quality Beef, and the US suspended all trade sanctions on EU products resulting from the Hormones dispute.
The MoU foresees that, should the Parties not reach agreement to enter into Phase 3 by the expiry of Phase 2, the MoU would be considered terminated; however, its core obligations of opening a quota for high quality beef and suspending all trade sanctions remain in place for six more months.
At this time there is no agreement to enter into Phase 3, but the termination of the MoU is not in the EU or US interest. The Parties could agree to extend Phase 2 until August 2015, while they continue discussions on Phase 3.
- The amendment of the MoU also clarifies the elements of Phase 3 , should the Parties agree to enter into it at the end of the extended Phase 2. The rules of the MoU concerning the management of licenses are also amended to reflect the system of "first come, first served", introduced in 2012.
Quota management and monitoring the implementation of the Understanding : measures are laid down to regulate the management of quotas in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).
The United States and the EU should:
monitor and review the operation of this Understanding; upon the request of either Party, conduct additional bilateral consultations regarding the operation of this Understanding, including issues of quota management.
Either the United States or the EU may withdraw from this Understanding by providing written notice to the other Party.
It should be noted that the Understanding includes clarifications on the meaning of ‘High Quality Beef’. The indication 'High Quality Beef' may be added to the information on the label.
Dispute settlements : provisions are set out which aim to resolve any dispute relating to the implementation of the Understanding.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implications for the EU budget.
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union.
PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.
BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date.
It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 207 in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union.
Purpose and objectives : the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC - Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones).
These steps are grouped in three phases.
Phase 1 (August 2009 - August 2012): the EU opened an autonomous erga omnes tariff quota for 20 000 tons of "High Quality Beef", and the US reduced the level of sanctions applied to EU products.
Phase 2 (August 2012 - August 2013): the EU opened a larger quota for 45 000 tons of High Quality Beef, and the US suspended all trade sanctions on EU products resulting from the Hormones dispute. The MoU foresees that, should the Parties not reach agreement to enter into Phase 3 by the expiry of Phase 2, the MoU would be considered terminated; however, its core obligations of opening a quota for high quality beef and suspending all trade sanctions remain in place for six more months.
At this time there is no agreement to enter into Phase 3, but the termination of the MoU is not in the EU or US interest. The Parties could agree to extend Phase 2 until August 2015, while they continue discussions on Phase 3.
The amendment of the MoU also clarifies the elements of Phase 3, should the Parties agree to enter into it at the end of the extended Phase 2. The rules of the MoU concerning the management of licenses are also amended to reflect the system of "first come, first served", introduced in 2012.
Quota Management : the Commission should implement and administer the tariff rate quota set out in this Understanding in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994.
The United States and the EU:
should monitor and review the operation of this Understanding; upon the request of either Party, conduct additional bilateral consultations regarding the operation of this Understanding, including issues of quota management.
Either the United States or the EU may withdraw from this Understanding by providing written notice to the other Party.
For the purposes of this Understanding, ‘High Quality Beef' has been defined. The indication 'High Quality Beef' may be added to the information on the label.
Disputes : provisions are made concerning the settlement of disputes as regards the implementation of the MoU.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: the proposal has no implication for the Union budget.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Decision 2014/44
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 027 30.01.2014, p. 0001
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0526/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0427/2013
- Committee opinion: PE521.554
- Legislative proposal: 14374/2013
- Document attached to the procedure: 14375/2013
- Committee draft report: PE521.595
- Legislative proposal published: 14374/2013
- Preparatory document: EUR-Lex
- Preparatory document: COM(2013)0677
- Committee draft report: PE521.595
- Legislative proposal: 14374/2013
- Document attached to the procedure: 14375/2013
- Committee opinion: PE521.554
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1 |
|
events/1/date |
Old
2013-10-15T00:00:00New
2013-10-14T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=NLE&year=2013&number=0324&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=NLE&year=2013&number=0324&appLng=EN |
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.595New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-PR-521595_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.554&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-521554_EN.html |
events/2/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0427_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0427_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0427&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0427_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0526New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0526_EN.html |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 150 |
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
INTA/7/14151New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0044New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32014D0044 |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0677:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52013PC0677:EN
|
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/servlet/driver?page=Result&lang=EN&typ=Advanced&cmsid=639&ff_COTE_DOCUMENT=14374%2F13&fc=REGAISEN&srm=25&md=100New
http://register.consilium.europa.eu/content/out?lang=EN&typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_ID=14374%2F13&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESC |
activities/2/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845e0fb8127435bdbd74New
4f1ac782b819f25efd00008f |
activities/2/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187020fb8127435bdc130New
4f1ad9ceb819f207b3000038 |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de187b70fb8127435bdc233New
4f1ada9bb819f207b300007e |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1889d0fb8127435bdc384New
4f1adb1bb819f207b30000a9 |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de183820fb8127435bdbc2eNew
4f1ac687b819f25efd000046 |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
activities/2/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de187070fb8127435bdc136New
4f1ac48bb819f2589600001d |
activities/3/committees |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2013-12-10T00:00:00New
2013-11-28T00:00:00 |
activities/3/docs |
|
activities/3/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/4/committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845e0fb8127435bdbd74New
4f1ac782b819f25efd00008f |
activities/4/committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187020fb8127435bdc130New
4f1ad9ceb819f207b3000038 |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de187b70fb8127435bdc233New
4f1ada9bb819f207b300007e |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1889d0fb8127435bdc384New
4f1adb1bb819f207b30000a9 |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de183820fb8127435bdbc2eNew
4f1ac687b819f25efd000046 |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
activities/4/committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de187070fb8127435bdc136New
4f1ac48bb819f2589600001d |
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-11-28T00:00:00New
2013-12-10T00:00:00 |
activities/5/docs |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
activities/9/docs/1/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2014:027:0001:0001:EN:PDFNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2014:027:TOC |
activities/9/text |
|
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de1845e0fb8127435bdbd74New
4f1ac782b819f25efd00008f |
committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
Old
4de187020fb8127435bdc130New
4f1ad9ceb819f207b3000038 |
committees/1/shadows/0/group |
Old
EPPNew
PPE |
committees/1/shadows/0/mepref |
Old
4de187b70fb8127435bdc233New
4f1ada9bb819f207b300007e |
committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
4de1889d0fb8127435bdc384New
4f1adb1bb819f207b30000a9 |
committees/1/shadows/2/mepref |
Old
4de183820fb8127435bdbc2eNew
4f1ac687b819f25efd000046 |
committees/1/shadows/3/mepref |
Old
4de1884b0fb8127435bdc307New
4f1adbb2b819f207b30000db |
committees/1/shadows/4/mepref |
Old
4de187070fb8127435bdc136New
4f1ac48bb819f2589600001d |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/9 |
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52013PC0677(01):ENNew
CELEX:52013PC0677:EN |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
Old
CELEX:52013PC0677:ENNew
CELEX:52013PC0677(01):EN |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/6 |
|
activities/7 |
|
activities/8 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting final decisionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
activities/0/type |
Old
Initial legislative proposalNew
Initial legislative proposal published |
activities/1 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
activities/7/docs/0/text |
|
activities/7/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0526
|
activities/7/docs |
|
activities/7/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Text adopted by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Awaiting final decision |
activities/6/docs/0/text |
|
activities/6 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/committees |
|
activities/5/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
|
activities/6/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in plenary scheduled |
activities/2/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date. It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union. LEGAL BASIS: the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union. Subject matter and scope: the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones). These steps are grouped in three phases. The ultimate aim is for the EU to increase the permitted amount of imported "high quality beef" from the United States and for the United States to reduce/suspend application of any additional import duties on EU products. For further details of the main provisions of the revised Memorandum of Understanding, please refer to the summary of the initial legislative proposal dated 02/10/2013. New
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date. It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union. LEGAL BASIS: the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union. Subject matter and scope: the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones). These steps are grouped in three phases. The ultimate aim is for the EU to increase the permitted amount of imported "high quality beef" from the United States and for the United States to reduce/suspend application of any additional import duties on EU products. Three- phased system: - Phase 1 (August 2009 - August 2012): the EU opened an autonomous erga omnes tariff quota for 20 000 tons of "High Quality Beef", and the US reduced the level of sanctions applied to EU products. - Phase 2 (August 2012 - August 2013): the EU opened a larger quota for 45 000 tons of High Quality Beef, and the US suspended all trade sanctions on EU products resulting from the Hormones dispute. The MoU foresees that, should the Parties not reach agreement to enter into Phase 3 by the expiry of Phase 2, the MoU would be considered terminated; however, its core obligations of opening a quota for high quality beef and suspending all trade sanctions remain in place for six more months. At this time there is no agreement to enter into Phase 3, but the termination of the MoU is not in the EU or US interest. The Parties could agree to extend Phase 2 until August 2015, while they continue discussions on Phase 3. - The amendment of the MoU also clarifies the elements of Phase 3, should the Parties agree to enter into it at the end of the extended Phase 2. The rules of the MoU concerning the management of licenses are also amended to reflect the system of "first come, first served", introduced in 2012. Quota management and monitoring the implementation of the Understanding: measures are laid down to regulate the management of quotas in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The United States and the EU should:
Either the United States or the EU may withdraw from this Understanding by providing written notice to the other Party. It should be noted that the Understanding includes clarifications on the meaning of High Quality Beef. The indication 'High Quality Beef' may be added to the information on the label. Dispute settlements: provisions are set out which aim to resolve any dispute relating to the implementation of the Understanding. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implications for the EU budget. |
activities/3/docs/0/text/0 |
Old
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date. It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union. LEGAL BASIS: the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union. Subject matter and scope: the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones). These steps are grouped in three phases. The ultimate aim is for the EU to increase the permitted amount of imported "high quality beef" from the United States and for the United States to reduce/suspend application of any additional import duties on EU products. For further details of the main provisions of the revised Memorandum of Understanding, please refer to the summary of the initial legislative proposal dated 02/10/2013. New
PURPOSE: to conclude the revised Memorandum of Understanding with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union. PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision. ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act. BACKGROUND: in accordance with a Council Decision, the revised Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the United States of America Regarding the Importation of Beef from Animals Not Treated with Certain Growth-Promoting Hormones and Increased Duties Applied by the United States to Certain Products of the European Union was signed in Geneva on 13 May 2009, subject to its conclusion at a later date. It is now necessary to approve the revised MoU on behalf of the European Union. LEGAL BASIS: the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). CONTENT: with the proposed Decision, it is sought to invite the Council to approve the abovementioned Protocol on behalf of the European Union. Subject matter and scope: the MoU sets out different steps concerning the importation of beef not treated with growth-promoting hormones into the EU, as well the imposition of trade sanctions by the United States against EU products as part of the WTO dispute on EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones). These steps are grouped in three phases. The ultimate aim is for the EU to increase the permitted amount of imported "high quality beef" from the United States and for the United States to reduce/suspend application of any additional import duties on EU products. Three- phased system: - Phase 1 (August 2009 - August 2012): the EU opened an autonomous erga omnes tariff quota for 20 000 tons of "High Quality Beef", and the US reduced the level of sanctions applied to EU products. - Phase 2 (August 2012 - August 2013): the EU opened a larger quota for 45 000 tons of High Quality Beef, and the US suspended all trade sanctions on EU products resulting from the Hormones dispute. The MoU foresees that, should the Parties not reach agreement to enter into Phase 3 by the expiry of Phase 2, the MoU would be considered terminated; however, its core obligations of opening a quota for high quality beef and suspending all trade sanctions remain in place for six more months. At this time there is no agreement to enter into Phase 3, but the termination of the MoU is not in the EU or US interest. The Parties could agree to extend Phase 2 until August 2015, while they continue discussions on Phase 3. - The amendment of the MoU also clarifies the elements of Phase 3, should the Parties agree to enter into it at the end of the extended Phase 2. The rules of the MoU concerning the management of licenses are also amended to reflect the system of "first come, first served", introduced in 2012. Quota management and monitoring the implementation of the Understanding: measures are laid down to regulate the management of quotas in accordance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The United States and the EU should:
Either the United States or the EU may withdraw from this Understanding by providing written notice to the other Party. It should be noted that the Understanding includes clarifications on the meaning of High Quality Beef. The indication 'High Quality Beef' may be added to the information on the label. Dispute settlements: provisions are set out which aim to resolve any dispute relating to the implementation of the Understanding. BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: this proposal has no implications for the EU budget. |
activities/6/date |
Old
2013-12-09T00:00:00New
2013-12-10T00:00:00 |
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-11-27T00:00:00New
2013-11-28T00:00:00 |
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/docs/0/text |
|
activities/5/date |
Old
2013-11-28T00:00:00New
2013-11-27T00:00:00 |
links/National parliaments |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
INTA/7/14151
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
activities/0/docs/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposal publishedNew
Initial legislative proposal published |
activities/0/type |
Old
Legislative proposalNew
Initial legislative proposal |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|