BETA


2013/2057(INL) EU donor coordination on development aid

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead DEVE MITCHELL Gay (icon: PPE PPE) GUERRERO SALOM Enrique (icon: S&D S&D), GOERENS Charles (icon: ALDE ALDE), TAYLOR Keith (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), DEVA Nirj (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion AFET BICEP Jean-Jacob (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 47

Events

2014/05/06
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/12/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/12/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on EU donor coordination on development aid.

Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to honour their commitments under the Paris Declaration, the Accra Agenda for Action and the Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, the main obstacles to which are lack of political will, bureaucracy and high transaction costs.

Parliament recalled in this context that one basic condition to fulfil the "aid effectiveness agenda" is to embrace fully the principle of "democratic ownership", implying that development strategies are country-driven. It called on the EU and its Member States to fully exploit the legal provisions of the TFEU on development that call for complementarity between the EU and its Member States in development cooperation.

It demanded in particular:

· more effective coordination by the EU and its Member States of cross-country division of labour in order to address the problem of "aid darlings" and "aid orphans";

· that horizontal issues such as human rights, gender equality and climate change are fully addressed;

· a re-evaluation of the comparative advantages of the EU and its Member States in the division of tasks in the development field;

· the participation between all development actors.

Pooling resources : Parliament stressed that, by pooling the resources provided by donor countries, multilateral development organisations have the potential to increase aid effectiveness and maximise efficiency.

It stressed the importance of supporting:

· the development of those countries’ capacity so that they can build up the skills, know-how and institutions required to manage their own development;

· free trade, a market economy and entrepreneurship in order for developing countries themselves to be able to fight poverty;

· combatting corruption and building up their fiscal infrastructure.

Parliament emphasised the growing role of non-traditional donors, as well as private-sector investments, and philanthropic financial flows to developing countries that pose additional coordination challenges .

Differentiated approach to aid effectiveness : Parliament underlined the importance of a differentiated approach to aid effectiveness, taking into account the level of development of the partner countries (least developed, fragile or middle-income) and their specific needs. It considered that this differentiated approach should be based on multidimensional development indicators going beyond GDP that take into account in-country poverty, inequality and vulnerability.

It called also on the EU to ensure that the commitments on aid and development effectiveness are fully reflected in all the financial mechanisms relevant to development cooperation.

Improved donor and EU coordination : noting that improved donor and European Union coordination is imperative, Parliament requested the Commission to submit, no later than the first semester of 2016, on the basis of Articles 209 and 210 of the TFEU, a proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid , following the adoption and implementation of a road map of preparatory actions to facilitate the entry into force of these regulatory aspects. This would be evaluated by the Commission and the EEAS on the basis of a set of indicators previously agreed. This evaluation process would involve EU delegations together with Member States' diplomatic representations in partner countries as well as the European Parliament

Lastly, Parliament proposed a series of technical recommendations to define the contours of the requested proposal.

A proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid.

Scope: the proposal should provide an appropriate solution to the question of improving the effectiveness of EU development aid.

Principles: the future Regulation should codify the following principles:

· the ownership of aid by its beneficiaries;

· harmonisation: the EU and its Member States should implement common arrangements at country level for programming (joint programming) and work together to reduce the number of missions to the field;

· alignment: the EU and its Members States should avoid creating dedicated structures for day-to-day management and implementation of aid-financed projects and programmes.

· the predictability of funds;

· transparency and mutual accountability;

· differentiated approach;

· review, evaluation and discussion of results.

Other technical provisions : provisions should be provided in matters:

· joint programming so as to avoid unnecessary parallel processes;

· division of labour at the country level (for example, by limiting the number of EU donors active in sector policy dialogue and cooperation activities) or between countries (by establishing better geographic concentration taking into account "darling" and "orphan" countries);

· monitoring progress at headquarters and country level;

· the involvement of national parliaments in the monitoring of donor coordination; v) reporting to the European Parliament and the Council;

· a review after a report evaluating the implementation of the Regulation in the first three years; and

· the establishment of a Coordinating Committee.

Documents
2013/12/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/11/15
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Development Committee adopted the own-initiative report by Gay MITCHELL (EPP, IE) with recommendations to the Commission on EU donor coordination on development aid (Own-initiative - Article 42 of the European Parliament Rules of Procedure).

The committee called on the EU and its Member States to honour their commitments under the Paris Declaration, the Accra Agenda for Action and the Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, the main obstacles to which are lack of political will, bureaucracy and high transaction costs .

The Committee recalls in this context that one basic condition to fulfil the "aid effectiveness agenda" is to embrace fully the principle of "democratic ownership", implying that development strategies are country-driven. It calls on the EU and its Member States to fully exploit the legal provisions of the TFEU on development that call for complementarity between the EU and its Member States in development cooperation.

It demands in particular:

more effective coordination by the EU and its Member States of cross-country division of labour in order to address the problem of "aid darlings" and "aid orphans"; that horizontal issues such as human rights, gender equality and climate change are fully addressed; a re-evaluation of the comparative advantages of the EU and its Member States in the division of tasks in the development field; the participation between all development actors.

Pooling resources : the Committee stress that, by pooling the resources provided by donor countries, multilateral development organisations have the potential to increase aid effectiveness and maximise efficiency .

It stressed the importance of supporting:

the development of those countries’ capacity so that they can build up the skills, know-how and institutions required to manage their own development; free trade, a market economy and entrepreneurship in order for developing countries themselves to be able to fight poverty; combatting corruption and building up their fiscal infrastructure.

The Committee emphasises the growing role of non-traditional donors, as well as private-sector investments, and philanthropic financial flows to developing countries that pose additional coordination challenges .

Differentiated approach to aid effectiveness : the Committee underlines the importance of a differentiated approach to aid effectiveness, taking into account the level of development of the partner countries (least developed, fragile or middle-income) and their specific needs. They consider that this differentiated approach should be based on multidimensional development indicators going beyond GDP that take into account in-country poverty, inequality and vulnerability.

They equally call on the EU to ensure that the commitments on aid and development effectiveness are fully reflected in all the financial mechanisms relevant to development cooperation.

Improved donor and EU coordination : noting that improved donor and European Union coordination is imperative, the Committee requests the Commission to submit, no later than the first semester of 2016, on the basis of Articles 209 and 210 of the TFEU, a proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid , following the adoption and implementation of a road map of preparatory actions to facilitate the entry into force of these regulatory aspects. This would be evaluated by the Commission and the EEAS on the basis of a set of indicators previously agreed. This evaluation process would involve EU delegations together with Member States' diplomatic representations in partner countries as well as the European Parliament

Finally, the Committee proposed a series of technical recommendations to define the contours of the requested proposal:

Scope : the proposal should provide an appropriate solution to the question of improving the effectiveness of EU development aid.

Principles : the future Regulation should codify the following principles:

· the ownership of aid by its beneficiaries;

· harmonisation: the EU and its Member States should implement common arrangements at country level for programming (joint programming) and work together to reduce the number of missions to the field;

· alignment: the EU and its Members States should avoid creating dedicated structures for day-to-day management and implementation of aid-financed projects and programmes.

· the predictability of funds;

· transparency and mutual accountability;

· differentiated approach;

· review, evaluation and discussion of results.

Provisions should be provided in matters: i) joint programming so as to avoid unnecessary parallel processes; ii) division of labour at the country level (for example, by limiting the number of EU donors active in sector policy dialogue and cooperation activities) or between countries (by establishing better geographic concentration taking into account "darling" and "orphan" countries); iii) monitoring progress at headquarters and country level; iv) the involvement of national parliaments in the monitoring of donor coordination; v) reporting to the European Parliament and the Council; vi) a review after a report evaluating the implementation of the Regulation in the first three years; and the establishment of a Coordinating Committee.

Documents
2013/11/05
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/10/28
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/10/14
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/08/26
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/06/07
   EP - MITCHELL Gay (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in DEVE
2013/04/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/03/21
   EP - BICEP Jean-Jacob (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/4
name
GUSTAFSSON Mikael
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.838
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-PR-516838_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.593
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AM-521593_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.945&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-516945_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2013-11-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0393_EN.html title: A7-0393/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-11-15T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0393_EN.html title: A7-0393/2013
summary
events/4
date
2013-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0558_EN.html title: T7-0558/2013
summary
events/4
date
2013-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0558_EN.html title: T7-0558/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 47
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 046
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
rapporteur
name: MITCHELL Gay date: 2013-06-07T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2013-06-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MITCHELL Gay group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: BICEP Jean-Jacob date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BICEP Jean-Jacob group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0393&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0393_EN.html
events/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0558
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0558_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2013-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: BICEP Jean-Jacob body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: ECR name: DEVA Nirj group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2013-06-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: MITCHELL Gay
  • date: 2013-11-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: BICEP Jean-Jacob body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: ECR name: DEVA Nirj group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2013-06-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: MITCHELL Gay
  • date: 2013-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0393&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0393/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23691&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0558 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0558/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
date
2013-06-07T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MITCHELL Gay group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
AFET
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: Verts/ALE name: BICEP Jean-Jacob
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2013-03-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BICEP Jean-Jacob group: Greens/European Free Alliance abbr: Verts/ALE
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
DEVE
date
2013-06-07T00:00:00
committee_full
Development
rapporteur
group: PPE name: MITCHELL Gay
docs
  • date: 2013-08-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.838 title: PE516.838 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE521.593 title: PE521.593 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.945&secondRef=02 title: PE516.945 committee: AFET type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2014-05-06T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23691&j=0&l=en title: SP(2014)260 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2013-04-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-05T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-11-15T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0393&language=EN title: A7-0393/2013 summary: The Development Committee adopted the own-initiative report by Gay MITCHELL (EPP, IE) with recommendations to the Commission on EU donor coordination on development aid (Own-initiative - Article 42 of the European Parliament Rules of Procedure). The committee called on the EU and its Member States to honour their commitments under the Paris Declaration, the Accra Agenda for Action and the Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, the main obstacles to which are lack of political will, bureaucracy and high transaction costs . The Committee recalls in this context that one basic condition to fulfil the "aid effectiveness agenda" is to embrace fully the principle of "democratic ownership", implying that development strategies are country-driven. It calls on the EU and its Member States to fully exploit the legal provisions of the TFEU on development that call for complementarity between the EU and its Member States in development cooperation. It demands in particular: more effective coordination by the EU and its Member States of cross-country division of labour in order to address the problem of "aid darlings" and "aid orphans"; that horizontal issues such as human rights, gender equality and climate change are fully addressed; a re-evaluation of the comparative advantages of the EU and its Member States in the division of tasks in the development field; the participation between all development actors. Pooling resources : the Committee stress that, by pooling the resources provided by donor countries, multilateral development organisations have the potential to increase aid effectiveness and maximise efficiency . It stressed the importance of supporting: the development of those countries’ capacity so that they can build up the skills, know-how and institutions required to manage their own development; free trade, a market economy and entrepreneurship in order for developing countries themselves to be able to fight poverty; combatting corruption and building up their fiscal infrastructure. The Committee emphasises the growing role of non-traditional donors, as well as private-sector investments, and philanthropic financial flows to developing countries that pose additional coordination challenges . Differentiated approach to aid effectiveness : the Committee underlines the importance of a differentiated approach to aid effectiveness, taking into account the level of development of the partner countries (least developed, fragile or middle-income) and their specific needs. They consider that this differentiated approach should be based on multidimensional development indicators going beyond GDP that take into account in-country poverty, inequality and vulnerability. They equally call on the EU to ensure that the commitments on aid and development effectiveness are fully reflected in all the financial mechanisms relevant to development cooperation. Improved donor and EU coordination : noting that improved donor and European Union coordination is imperative, the Committee requests the Commission to submit, no later than the first semester of 2016, on the basis of Articles 209 and 210 of the TFEU, a proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid , following the adoption and implementation of a road map of preparatory actions to facilitate the entry into force of these regulatory aspects. This would be evaluated by the Commission and the EEAS on the basis of a set of indicators previously agreed. This evaluation process would involve EU delegations together with Member States' diplomatic representations in partner countries as well as the European Parliament Finally, the Committee proposed a series of technical recommendations to define the contours of the requested proposal: Scope : the proposal should provide an appropriate solution to the question of improving the effectiveness of EU development aid. Principles : the future Regulation should codify the following principles: · the ownership of aid by its beneficiaries; · harmonisation: the EU and its Member States should implement common arrangements at country level for programming (joint programming) and work together to reduce the number of missions to the field; · alignment: the EU and its Members States should avoid creating dedicated structures for day-to-day management and implementation of aid-financed projects and programmes. · the predictability of funds; · transparency and mutual accountability; · differentiated approach; · review, evaluation and discussion of results. Provisions should be provided in matters: i) joint programming so as to avoid unnecessary parallel processes; ii) division of labour at the country level (for example, by limiting the number of EU donors active in sector policy dialogue and cooperation activities) or between countries (by establishing better geographic concentration taking into account "darling" and "orphan" countries); iii) monitoring progress at headquarters and country level; iv) the involvement of national parliaments in the monitoring of donor coordination; v) reporting to the European Parliament and the Council; vi) a review after a report evaluating the implementation of the Regulation in the first three years; and the establishment of a Coordinating Committee.
  • date: 2013-12-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23691&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-12-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0558 title: T7-0558/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on EU donor coordination on development aid. Parliament called on the EU and its Member States to honour their commitments under the Paris Declaration, the Accra Agenda for Action and the Busan Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, the main obstacles to which are lack of political will, bureaucracy and high transaction costs. Parliament recalled in this context that one basic condition to fulfil the "aid effectiveness agenda" is to embrace fully the principle of "democratic ownership", implying that development strategies are country-driven. It called on the EU and its Member States to fully exploit the legal provisions of the TFEU on development that call for complementarity between the EU and its Member States in development cooperation. It demanded in particular: · more effective coordination by the EU and its Member States of cross-country division of labour in order to address the problem of "aid darlings" and "aid orphans"; · that horizontal issues such as human rights, gender equality and climate change are fully addressed; · a re-evaluation of the comparative advantages of the EU and its Member States in the division of tasks in the development field; · the participation between all development actors. Pooling resources : Parliament stressed that, by pooling the resources provided by donor countries, multilateral development organisations have the potential to increase aid effectiveness and maximise efficiency. It stressed the importance of supporting: · the development of those countries’ capacity so that they can build up the skills, know-how and institutions required to manage their own development; · free trade, a market economy and entrepreneurship in order for developing countries themselves to be able to fight poverty; · combatting corruption and building up their fiscal infrastructure. Parliament emphasised the growing role of non-traditional donors, as well as private-sector investments, and philanthropic financial flows to developing countries that pose additional coordination challenges . Differentiated approach to aid effectiveness : Parliament underlined the importance of a differentiated approach to aid effectiveness, taking into account the level of development of the partner countries (least developed, fragile or middle-income) and their specific needs. It considered that this differentiated approach should be based on multidimensional development indicators going beyond GDP that take into account in-country poverty, inequality and vulnerability. It called also on the EU to ensure that the commitments on aid and development effectiveness are fully reflected in all the financial mechanisms relevant to development cooperation. Improved donor and EU coordination : noting that improved donor and European Union coordination is imperative, Parliament requested the Commission to submit, no later than the first semester of 2016, on the basis of Articles 209 and 210 of the TFEU, a proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid , following the adoption and implementation of a road map of preparatory actions to facilitate the entry into force of these regulatory aspects. This would be evaluated by the Commission and the EEAS on the basis of a set of indicators previously agreed. This evaluation process would involve EU delegations together with Member States' diplomatic representations in partner countries as well as the European Parliament Lastly, Parliament proposed a series of technical recommendations to define the contours of the requested proposal. A proposal for an act concerning regulatory aspects on EU donor coordination on development aid. Scope: the proposal should provide an appropriate solution to the question of improving the effectiveness of EU development aid. Principles: the future Regulation should codify the following principles: · the ownership of aid by its beneficiaries; · harmonisation: the EU and its Member States should implement common arrangements at country level for programming (joint programming) and work together to reduce the number of missions to the field; · alignment: the EU and its Members States should avoid creating dedicated structures for day-to-day management and implementation of aid-financed projects and programmes. · the predictability of funds; · transparency and mutual accountability; · differentiated approach; · review, evaluation and discussion of results. Other technical provisions : provisions should be provided in matters: · joint programming so as to avoid unnecessary parallel processes; · division of labour at the country level (for example, by limiting the number of EU donors active in sector policy dialogue and cooperation activities) or between countries (by establishing better geographic concentration taking into account "darling" and "orphan" countries); · monitoring progress at headquarters and country level; · the involvement of national parliaments in the monitoring of donor coordination; v) reporting to the European Parliament and the Council; · a review after a report evaluating the implementation of the Regulation in the first three years; and · the establishment of a Coordinating Committee.
  • date: 2013-12-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ title: International Cooperation and Development commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
DEVE/7/12436
New
  • DEVE/7/12436
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 046
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
procedure/subject
Old
  • 6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
New
6.30.02
Financial and technical cooperation and assistance
other/0/dg/title
Old
EuropeAid Development and Cooperation
New
International Cooperation and Development
activities
  • date: 2013-04-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: BICEP Jean-Jacob body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: ECR name: DEVA Nirj group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2013-06-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: MITCHELL Gay
  • date: 2013-11-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: BICEP Jean-Jacob body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: ECR name: DEVA Nirj group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2013-06-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: MITCHELL Gay
  • date: 2013-11-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-0393&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0393/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-12-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23691&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0558 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0558/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: AFET date: 2013-03-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: Verts/ALE name: BICEP Jean-Jacob
  • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: GUERRERO SALOM Enrique group: ALDE name: GOERENS Charles group: Verts/ALE name: TAYLOR Keith group: ECR name: DEVA Nirj group: GUE/NGL name: GUSTAFSSON Mikael responsible: True committee: DEVE date: 2013-06-07T00:00:00 committee_full: Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: MITCHELL Gay
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ title: EuropeAid Development and Cooperation commissioner: PIEBALGS Andris
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
DEVE/7/12436
reference
2013/2057(INL)
title
EU donor coordination on development aid
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 046
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Request for legislative proposal
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INL - Legislative initiative procedure
subject
6.30.02 Financial and technical cooperation and assistance