BETA


2013/2621(RSP) Resolution on the European neighbourhood policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership - position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET SARYUSZ-WOLSKI Jacek (icon: PPE PPE), PANZERI Pier Antonio (icon: S&D S&D) DAVID Mário (icon: PPE PPE), SIWIEC Marek (icon: S&D S&D), WEBER Renate (icon: ALDE ALDE), FLAUTRE Hélène (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), SCHULZ Werner (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), KOWAL Paweł Robert (icon: ECR ECR), TANNOCK Timothy Charles Ayrton (icon: ECR ECR)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2

Events

2013/10/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/10/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the European Neighbourhood Policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership. Position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports.

Whilst welcoming the publication of the 2012 progress reports for the ENP South and Eastern countries, Parliament regretted that, in most cases, the reports presented a mixed picture of progress, stagnation and regression. They described the national situation without evaluating the programmes carried out by the Union or making concrete recommendations regarding the allocation of funds under the EU external instruments or development cooperation assistance and its influence on policy-making in the partner countries. The reports should also assess trends by containing data for previous years.

Involvement of Parliament : Members strongly believed that Parliament should be fully involved in implementing the new ENP and in adjusting EU financial support, notably through delegated acts, and should be kept regularly informed about progress in the implementation of reforms in the partner countries and resulting adjustments. They deplored the fact that Parliament was not always consulted when action plans are drawn up or informed about the tenor of discussions, and they called for the status of observer to be accorded to MEPs to take part in meetings of policy and human rights subcommittees.

‘More for more’ principle: Parliament called for the consistent implementation of the incentive-based and differentiated approaches and of the principle of ‘more for more’ as the cornerstone of the revised ENP. It also called for ’less for less’ if necessary for those ENP countries making insufficient efforts to build a deep and sustainable democracy and to undertake the agreed reforms.

Democratic transition : Members stressed the need to support the democratic transition processes and that freedom of expression, pluralism and media independence are cornerstones of democracy. They called on the Commission and the EEAS to continue and, wherever possible, to reinforce their support for the democratic conduct of upcoming elections in the partner countries, including the strengthening of media freedom and pluralism.

Eastern Partnership : Parliament made a series of recommendations, stating that the EU should, inter alia:

· strengthen the application of the more-for-more principle and stimulate it by positive competition and cooperation among partner countries, expressing necessary support to EaP states facing pressure from third countries when implementing the acquis communautaire ;

· apply a two-track approach, by making demands of EaP governments whilst being open, generous and engaging towards the citizens of partner countries;

· design a long-march strategy to promote European values encompassing internal change and the aspirations of these societies for freedom and prosperity;

· decentralise the EaP by engaging with, and offering its ownership to, public actors on both sides through horizontal partnerships and twinning, accompanied by increased mobility, people-to-people contacts, visa facilitation and the prospect of a visa-free system,

· initial or sign the Association Agreements and aim for their prompt entry into force, initially on a provisional basis and then in full, before the end of the current term of the European Parliament and the European Commission, provided that the necessary conditions and requirements have been met.

Parliament started its concern about Russian actions designed to deter partner countries from political and economic association with the EU.

It went on to make a series of specific remarks about partner countries, these being: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Regarding the latter, Members recommended that the Council sign the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine if the conditions are met.

The Southern Neighbourhood : Parliament was concerned at the difficulties being encountered by the southern Mediterranean countries in overcoming the challenges of their democratic transitions , taking the view that a successful transition to sustainable democracy must be the Union’s priority regarding its Southern Neighbourhood, and calling for the EU institutions and the Member States to increase their support to that effect.

Members pointed out that social justice and improving the quality of life are key elements of the transitions currently taking place in the Southern Neighbourhood countries, expressing deep concern at the employment situation, in particular among young people, and they urged the Commission to support effective employment policies . They believed that there was an urgent need to promote projects for sustainable and inclusive socio-economic development and integration in the Maghreb in order to facilitate the circulation of goods, services, capital and persons. Furthermore, Parliament wanted the EU and its Member States to implement a concrete and effective mobility policy with the countries of the Southern Neighbourhood , in particular by simultaneously signing visa liberalisation agreements and readmission agreements similar to those signed with most countries of the Eastern Partnership, underlining the importance of increasing mobility and cooperation in the field of academic education and vocational training.

Parliament went on to make a series of specific observations regarding Southern Neighbourhood partner countries, these being: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria and Tunisia.

Documents
2013/10/23
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/10/22
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/10/17
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2013/09/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/09/16
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/04/23
   EP - SARYUSZ-WOLSKI Jacek (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET
2013/04/23
   EP - PANZERI Pier Antonio (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.932
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-516932_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.498
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-519498_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0484_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0484_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131022&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-10-22-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2013-10-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0446_EN.html title: T7-0446/2013
summary
events/2
date
2013-10-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0446_EN.html title: T7-0446/2013
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
shadows
name: WEBER Renate group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-484&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-7-2013-0484_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-446
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0446_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
shadows
name: WEBER Renate group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
activities
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131022&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23605&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-446 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0446/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
docs
  • date: 2013-09-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE516.932 title: PE516.932 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-09-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE519.498 title: PE519.498 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-10-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-484&language=EN title: B7-0484/2013 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
events
  • date: 2013-10-22T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131022&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23605&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-446 title: T7-0446/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the European Neighbourhood Policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership. Position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports. Whilst welcoming the publication of the 2012 progress reports for the ENP South and Eastern countries, Parliament regretted that, in most cases, the reports presented a mixed picture of progress, stagnation and regression. They described the national situation without evaluating the programmes carried out by the Union or making concrete recommendations regarding the allocation of funds under the EU external instruments or development cooperation assistance and its influence on policy-making in the partner countries. The reports should also assess trends by containing data for previous years. Involvement of Parliament : Members strongly believed that Parliament should be fully involved in implementing the new ENP and in adjusting EU financial support, notably through delegated acts, and should be kept regularly informed about progress in the implementation of reforms in the partner countries and resulting adjustments. They deplored the fact that Parliament was not always consulted when action plans are drawn up or informed about the tenor of discussions, and they called for the status of observer to be accorded to MEPs to take part in meetings of policy and human rights subcommittees. ‘More for more’ principle: Parliament called for the consistent implementation of the incentive-based and differentiated approaches and of the principle of ‘more for more’ as the cornerstone of the revised ENP. It also called for ’less for less’ if necessary for those ENP countries making insufficient efforts to build a deep and sustainable democracy and to undertake the agreed reforms. Democratic transition : Members stressed the need to support the democratic transition processes and that freedom of expression, pluralism and media independence are cornerstones of democracy. They called on the Commission and the EEAS to continue and, wherever possible, to reinforce their support for the democratic conduct of upcoming elections in the partner countries, including the strengthening of media freedom and pluralism. Eastern Partnership : Parliament made a series of recommendations, stating that the EU should, inter alia: · strengthen the application of the more-for-more principle and stimulate it by positive competition and cooperation among partner countries, expressing necessary support to EaP states facing pressure from third countries when implementing the acquis communautaire ; · apply a two-track approach, by making demands of EaP governments whilst being open, generous and engaging towards the citizens of partner countries; · design a long-march strategy to promote European values encompassing internal change and the aspirations of these societies for freedom and prosperity; · decentralise the EaP by engaging with, and offering its ownership to, public actors on both sides through horizontal partnerships and twinning, accompanied by increased mobility, people-to-people contacts, visa facilitation and the prospect of a visa-free system, · initial or sign the Association Agreements and aim for their prompt entry into force, initially on a provisional basis and then in full, before the end of the current term of the European Parliament and the European Commission, provided that the necessary conditions and requirements have been met. Parliament started its concern about Russian actions designed to deter partner countries from political and economic association with the EU. It went on to make a series of specific remarks about partner countries, these being: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Regarding the latter, Members recommended that the Council sign the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine if the conditions are met. The Southern Neighbourhood : Parliament was concerned at the difficulties being encountered by the southern Mediterranean countries in overcoming the challenges of their democratic transitions , taking the view that a successful transition to sustainable democracy must be the Union’s priority regarding its Southern Neighbourhood, and calling for the EU institutions and the Member States to increase their support to that effect. Members pointed out that social justice and improving the quality of life are key elements of the transitions currently taking place in the Southern Neighbourhood countries, expressing deep concern at the employment situation, in particular among young people, and they urged the Commission to support effective employment policies . They believed that there was an urgent need to promote projects for sustainable and inclusive socio-economic development and integration in the Maghreb in order to facilitate the circulation of goods, services, capital and persons. Furthermore, Parliament wanted the EU and its Member States to implement a concrete and effective mobility policy with the countries of the Southern Neighbourhood , in particular by simultaneously signing visa liberalisation agreements and readmission agreements similar to those signed with most countries of the Eastern Partnership, underlining the importance of increasing mobility and cooperation in the field of academic education and vocational training. Parliament went on to make a series of specific observations regarding Southern Neighbourhood partner countries, these being: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria and Tunisia.
  • date: 2013-10-23T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/7/13314
    New
    • AFET/7/13314
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 132-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.40.15 European neighbourhood policy
    New
    6.40.15
    European neighbourhood policy
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Resolution on statements
    New
    Resolution on statement
    procedure/title
    Old
    Resolution on the European Neighbourhood Policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership - position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports
    New
    Resolution on the European neighbourhood policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership - position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports
    activities/0
    date
    2013-09-16T00:00:00
    docs
    body
    EP
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/0/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRE
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131022&type=CRE
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2013-10-17T00:00:00
    New
    2013-10-23T00:00:00
    activities/1/docs/0/title
    Old
    B7-0484/2013
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/1/docs/0/type
    Old
    Motion for a resolution
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/1/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-484&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23605&l=en
    activities/1/docs/1
    url
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-446
    text

    The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Foreign Affairs on the European Neighbourhood Policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership. Position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports.

    Whilst welcoming the publication of the 2012 progress reports for the ENP South and Eastern countries, Parliament regretted that, in most cases, the reports presented a mixed picture of progress, stagnation and regression. They described the national situation without evaluating the programmes carried out by the Union or making concrete recommendations regarding the allocation of funds under the EU external instruments or development cooperation assistance and its influence on policy-making in the partner countries. The reports should also assess trends by containing data for previous years.

    Involvement of Parliament: Members strongly believed that Parliament should be fully involved in implementing the new ENP and in adjusting EU financial support, notably through delegated acts, and should be kept regularly informed about progress in the implementation of reforms in the partner countries and resulting adjustments. They deplored the fact that Parliament was not always consulted when action plans are drawn up or informed about the tenor of discussions, and they called for the status of observer to be accorded to MEPs to take part in meetings of policy and human rights subcommittees.

    ‘More for more’ principle: Parliament called for the consistent implementation of the incentive-based and differentiated approaches and of the principle of ‘more for more’ as the cornerstone of the revised ENP. It also called for ’less for less’ if necessary for those ENP countries making insufficient efforts to build a deep and sustainable democracy and to undertake the agreed reforms.

    Democratic transition: Members stressed the need to support the democratic transition processes and that freedom of expression, pluralism and media independence are cornerstones of democracy. They called on the Commission and the EEAS to continue and, wherever possible, to reinforce their support for the democratic conduct of upcoming elections in the partner countries, including the strengthening of media freedom and pluralism.

    Eastern Partnership: Parliament made a series of recommendations, stating that the EU should, inter alia:

    ·        strengthen the application of the more-for-more principle and stimulate it by positive competition and cooperation among partner countries, expressing necessary support to EaP states facing pressure from third countries when implementing the acquis communautaire ;

    ·        apply a two-track approach, by making demands of EaP governments whilst being open, generous and engaging towards the citizens of partner countries;

    ·        design a long-march strategy to promote European values encompassing internal change and the aspirations of these societies for freedom and prosperity;

    ·        decentralise the EaP by engaging with, and offering its ownership to, public actors on both sides through horizontal partnerships and twinning, accompanied by increased mobility, people-to-people contacts, visa facilitation and the prospect of a visa-free system,

    ·        initial or sign the Association Agreements and aim for their prompt entry into force, initially on a provisional basis and then in full, before the end of the current term of the European Parliament and the European Commission, provided that the necessary conditions and requirements have been met. 

    Parliament started its concern about Russian actions designed to deter partner countries from political and economic association with the EU.

    It went on to make a series of specific remarks about partner countries, these being: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. Regarding the latter, Members recommended that the Council sign the Association Agreement between the EU and Ukraine if the conditions are met.

    The Southern Neighbourhood: Parliament was concerned at the difficulties being encountered by the southern Mediterranean countries in overcoming the challenges of their democratic transitions, taking the view that a successful transition to sustainable democracy must be the Union’s priority regarding its Southern Neighbourhood, and calling for the EU institutions and the Member States to increase their support to that effect.

    Members pointed out that social justice and improving the quality of life are key elements of the transitions currently taking place in the Southern Neighbourhood countries, expressing deep concern at the employment situation, in particular among young people, and they urged the Commission to support effective employment policies. They believed that there was an urgent need to promote projects for sustainable and inclusive socio-economic development and integration in the Maghreb in order to facilitate the circulation of goods, services, capital and persons. Furthermore, Parliament wanted the EU and its Member States to implement a concrete and effective mobility policy with the countries of the Southern Neighbourhood, in particular by simultaneously signing visa liberalisation agreements and readmission agreements similar to those signed with most countries of the Eastern Partnership, underlining the importance of increasing mobility and cooperation in the field of academic education and vocational training.

    Parliament went on to make a series of specific observations regarding Southern Neighbourhood partner countries, these being: Algeria, Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Palestine, Syria and Tunisia.

    type
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    title
    T7-0446/2013
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Motion for a resolution
    New
    Results of vote in Parliament
    activities/3
    date
    2013-10-23T00:00:00
    docs
    type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0446/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
    committees/0/rapporteur/0/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
    Old
    4de188780fb8127435bdc34e
    New
    4f1adb0fb819f207b30000a5
    committees/0/rapporteur/1/mepref
    Old
    4de1878e0fb8127435bdc1fa
    New
    4f1ada3db819f207b300005e
    committees/0/shadows/0/group
    Old
    EPP
    New
    PPE
    committees/0/shadows/0/mepref
    Old
    4de1845d0fb8127435bdbd72
    New
    4f1ac775b819f25efd00008b
    committees/0/shadows/1/mepref
    Old
    4de188870fb8127435bdc365
    New
    4f1adb6cb819f207b30000c3
    committees/0/shadows/2/mepref
    Old
    4de189630fb8127435bdc48f
    New
    4f1adc87b819f207b3000121
    committees/0/shadows/3/mepref
    Old
    4de184b10fb8127435bdbde8
    New
    4f1ac804b819f25efd0000c1
    committees/0/shadows/4/mepref
    Old
    4de1889f0fb8127435bdc387
    New
    4f1adb3cb819f207b30000b3
    committees/0/shadows/5/mepref
    Old
    4de1860a0fb8127435bdbfd1
    New
    4f1ad20ab819f27595000000
    committees/0/shadows/6/mepref
    Old
    4de188d00fb8127435bdc3ca
    New
    4f1adbd1b819f207b30000e7
    committees/0/shadows/7/mepref
    Old
    4de186e10fb8127435bdc108
    New
    4f1ad9b2b819f207b300002e
    committees/0/shadows/8/mepref
    Old
    4de1889e0fb8127435bdc386
    New
    4f1adb31b819f207b30000af
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2
    New
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 123-p2
    activities/3/docs
    • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0446/2013
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/title
    Old
    European Neighbourhood Policy, working towards a stronger partnership: European Parliament position on the 2012 progress reports
    New
    Resolution on the European Neighbourhood Policy: towards a strengthening of the partnership - position of the European Parliament on the 2012 reports
    activities/1
    date
    2013-10-17T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2013-484&language=EN type: Motion for a resolution title: B7-0484/2013
    body
    EP
    type
    Motion for a resolution
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=[%EY][%m][%d]&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    procedure/title
    Old
    European Neighbourhood Policy, working towards a stronger partnership: Parliament's position on the 2012 progress reports
    New
    European Neighbourhood Policy, working towards a stronger partnership: European Parliament position on the 2012 progress reports
    activities/0
    date
    2013-09-16T00:00:00
    docs
    body
    EP
    type
    Amendments tabled in committee
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/date
    Old
    2013-09-11T00:00:00
    New
    2013-10-23T00:00:00
    activities/2/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    committees/0/shadows/0
    group
    EPP
    name
    DAVID Mário
    committees/0/shadows/2
    group
    ALDE
    name
    WEBER Renate
    committees/0/shadows/3
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    FLAUTRE Hélène
    committees/0/shadows/4
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    SCHULZ Werner
    committees/0/shadows/5
    group
    ECR
    name
    KOWAL Paweł Robert
    committees/0/shadows/6
    group
    ECR
    name
    TANNOCK Charles
    committees/0/shadows/7
    group
    GUE/NGL
    name
    MEYER Willy
    committees/0/shadows/8
    group
    GUE/NGL
    name
    SCHOLZ Helmut
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: SIWIEC Marek
    activities/1
    date
    2013-10-22T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee
    AFET
    date
    committee_full
    Foreign Affairs
    rapporteur
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    AFET/7/13314
    activities
    • date: 2013-09-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
    committees
      links
      other
        procedure
        reference
        2013/2621(RSP)
        title
        European Neighbourhood Policy, working towards a stronger partnership: Parliament's position on the 2012 progress reports
        legal_basis
        Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 110-p2
        stage_reached
        Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
        subtype
        Resolution on statements
        type
        RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
        subject
        6.40.15 European neighbourhood policy