BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2014/2044(IMM) Request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead JURI ZWIEFKA Tadeusz (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 6

Events

2015/10/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2015/10/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament decided to waive the immunity of Béla KOVÁCS (NI, HU).

Parliament recalled that the request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács is made in order that investigations can be carried out, on the basis of reasonable suspicions, to see whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the offence of espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code.

According to that Section, any person who conducts intelligence activities for a non-European Union third country against the European Parliament, the European Commission or the Council of the European Union shall be punishable in accordance with Section 261; paragraph (1) of which provides that any person who conducts intelligence activities for a foreign power or foreign organisation against Hungary is guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of between two and eight years.

However, according to the information provided by the Prosecutor General, Mr Kovács’ covert contacts with Russian intelligence officers were first detected in 2010 by the Hungarian Constitution Protection Office in the course of its investigation into the activities of certain foreign nationals.

The investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 .

It is also noted that the criminal investigation will be carried out by the Central Chief Prosecution Office of Investigation and that under Article 29(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, the Prosecutor-General and the Prosecution Service are independent , and shall carry out their constitutional tasks independently from external organisations, and proceed in compliance with the presumption of innocence .

In order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles. One of these principles is that immunity is usually waived when the offence falls within Article 9 of Protocol No 7, provided that there is no fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned.

It is considered that there is no fumus persecutionis in this case and that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 , the date on which Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code entered into effect.

On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 9(3) of the Rules of Procedure, Parliament recommended that the parliamentary immunity of Mr Béla Kovács should be waived.

Documents
T8-0356/2015
2015/10/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/10/12
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/10/12
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Tadeusz ZWIEFKA (EPP, PL) in which it requested for waiver of the immunity of Béla KOVÁCS (NI, HU).

Members recalled that the request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács is made in order that investigations can be carried out, on the basis of reasonable suspicions, to see whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the offence of espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code.

According to that Section, any person who conducts intelligence activities for a non-European Union third country against the European Parliament, the European Commission or the Council of the European Union shall be punishable in accordance with Section 261; paragraph (1) of which provides that any person who conducts intelligence activities for a foreign power or foreign organisation against Hungary is guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of between two and eight years.

However, according to the information provided by the Prosecutor General, Mr Kovács’ covert contacts with Russian intelligence officers were first detected in 2010 by the Hungarian Constitution Protection Office in the course of its investigation into the activities of certain foreign nationals.

The Prosecutor made it clear that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 .

It is further noted that the criminal investigation will be carried out by the Central Chief Prosecution Office of Investigation and that, under Article 29(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, the Prosecutor-General and the Prosecution Service are independent , carry out their constitutional tasks independently from external organisations and proceed in compliance with the presumption of innocence .

Mr Kovács submits that, since Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 has been in force only since 1 January 2014, he could not be charged for acts committed prior to that date because of Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which, reflecting the general principle nullum crimen sine lege , provides that no one shall be held guilty of any criminal office on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed. Mr Kovács further claims that his activities in 2014 do not fall within Section 261/A.

Mr Kovács further argues that the surveillance conducted against him was unlawful, that there was a violation of the presumption of innocence, that Section 118(5) of Act CLXXXVI of 2013 criminalising espionage against the institutions of the EU was passed specifically in order to make Mr Kovács’ behaviour punishable and that the classification of the whole case is unlawful and unreasonable.

Waiving immunity : in order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles. One of these principles is that immunity is usually waived when the offence falls within Article 9 of Protocol No 7 , provided that there is no fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned.

After exchanges of letters with the national authorities, it is considered that there is no fumus persecutionis in this case.

More specifically as regards the argument based on the principle nullum crimen sine lege , it appears clearly from the statements of the Prosecutor General that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 , the date on which Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code entered into effect.

On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 9(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommended that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Mr Béla Kovács.

Documents
A8-0291/2015
2014/07/10
   EP - ZWIEFKA Tadeusz (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2021-12-18Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
events/0/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/1
date
2015-10-12T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0291_EN.html title: A8-0291/2015
summary
events/1
date
2015-10-12T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0291_EN.html title: A8-0291/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-10-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0356_EN.html title: T8-0356/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-10-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0356_EN.html title: T8-0356/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
2020-01-19Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
date
2014-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0291&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0291_EN.html
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0356
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0356_EN.html
2019-07-06Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2015-10-12T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0291&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0291/2015
  • date: 2015-10-14T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0356 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0356/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
associated
False
date
2014-07-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
JURI
date
2014-07-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz
events
  • date: 2015-10-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-12T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0291&language=EN title: A8-0291/2015 summary: The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Tadeusz ZWIEFKA (EPP, PL) in which it requested for waiver of the immunity of Béla KOVÁCS (NI, HU). Members recalled that the request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács is made in order that investigations can be carried out, on the basis of reasonable suspicions, to see whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the offence of espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code. According to that Section, any person who conducts intelligence activities for a non-European Union third country against the European Parliament, the European Commission or the Council of the European Union shall be punishable in accordance with Section 261; paragraph (1) of which provides that any person who conducts intelligence activities for a foreign power or foreign organisation against Hungary is guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of between two and eight years. However, according to the information provided by the Prosecutor General, Mr Kovács’ covert contacts with Russian intelligence officers were first detected in 2010 by the Hungarian Constitution Protection Office in the course of its investigation into the activities of certain foreign nationals. The Prosecutor made it clear that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 . It is further noted that the criminal investigation will be carried out by the Central Chief Prosecution Office of Investigation and that, under Article 29(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, the Prosecutor-General and the Prosecution Service are independent , carry out their constitutional tasks independently from external organisations and proceed in compliance with the presumption of innocence . Mr Kovács submits that, since Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 has been in force only since 1 January 2014, he could not be charged for acts committed prior to that date because of Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which, reflecting the general principle nullum crimen sine lege , provides that no one shall be held guilty of any criminal office on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed. Mr Kovács further claims that his activities in 2014 do not fall within Section 261/A. Mr Kovács further argues that the surveillance conducted against him was unlawful, that there was a violation of the presumption of innocence, that Section 118(5) of Act CLXXXVI of 2013 criminalising espionage against the institutions of the EU was passed specifically in order to make Mr Kovács’ behaviour punishable and that the classification of the whole case is unlawful and unreasonable. Waiving immunity : in order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles. One of these principles is that immunity is usually waived when the offence falls within Article 9 of Protocol No 7 , provided that there is no fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned. After exchanges of letters with the national authorities, it is considered that there is no fumus persecutionis in this case. More specifically as regards the argument based on the principle nullum crimen sine lege , it appears clearly from the statements of the Prosecutor General that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 , the date on which Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code entered into effect. On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 9(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommended that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Mr Béla Kovács.
  • date: 2015-10-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26289&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-10-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0356 title: T8-0356/2015 summary: The European Parliament decided to waive the immunity of Béla KOVÁCS (NI, HU). Parliament recalled that the request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács is made in order that investigations can be carried out, on the basis of reasonable suspicions, to see whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the offence of espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code. According to that Section, any person who conducts intelligence activities for a non-European Union third country against the European Parliament, the European Commission or the Council of the European Union shall be punishable in accordance with Section 261; paragraph (1) of which provides that any person who conducts intelligence activities for a foreign power or foreign organisation against Hungary is guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of between two and eight years. However, according to the information provided by the Prosecutor General, Mr Kovács’ covert contacts with Russian intelligence officers were first detected in 2010 by the Hungarian Constitution Protection Office in the course of its investigation into the activities of certain foreign nationals. The investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 . It is also noted that the criminal investigation will be carried out by the Central Chief Prosecution Office of Investigation and that under Article 29(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, the Prosecutor-General and the Prosecution Service are independent , and shall carry out their constitutional tasks independently from external organisations, and proceed in compliance with the presumption of innocence . In order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles. One of these principles is that immunity is usually waived when the offence falls within Article 9 of Protocol No 7, provided that there is no fumus persecutionis , i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned. It is considered that there is no fumus persecutionis in this case and that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014 , the date on which Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code entered into effect. On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 9(3) of the Rules of Procedure, Parliament recommended that the parliamentary immunity of Mr Béla Kovács should be waived.
  • date: 2015-10-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Old
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    New
    Rules of Procedure EP 159
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    JURI/8/00713
    New
    • JURI/8/00713
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 6
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 006
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 8.40.01.03 Members' immunity
    New
    8.40.01.03
    Members' immunity
    procedure/title
    Old
    Request for the waiver of parliamentary immunity of Béla Kovács
    New
    Request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács
    2015-11-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/0/docs/0/text

    • The Committee on Legal Affairs adopted the report by Tadeusz ZWIEFKA (EPP, PL) in which it requested for waiver of the immunity of Béla KOVÁCS (NI, HU).

      Members recalled that the request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács is made in order that investigations can be carried out, on the basis of reasonable suspicions, to see whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the offence of espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code.

      According to that Section, any person who conducts intelligence activities for a non-European Union third country against the European Parliament, the European Commission or the Council of the European Union shall be punishable in accordance with Section 261; paragraph (1) of which provides that any person who conducts intelligence activities for a foreign power or foreign organisation against Hungary is guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of between two and eight years.

      However, according to the information provided by the Prosecutor General, Mr Kovács’ covert contacts with Russian intelligence officers were first detected in 2010 by the Hungarian Constitution Protection Office in the course of its investigation into the activities of certain foreign nationals.

      The Prosecutor made it clear that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014.

      It is further noted that the criminal investigation will be carried out by the Central Chief Prosecution Office of Investigation and that, under Article 29(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, the Prosecutor-General and the Prosecution Service are independent, carry out their constitutional tasks independently from external organisations and proceed in compliance with the presumption of innocence.

      Mr Kovács submits that, since Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 has been in force only since 1 January 2014, he could not be charged for acts committed prior to that date because of Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which, reflecting the general principle nullum crimen sine lege, provides that no one shall be held guilty of any criminal office on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national law or international law at the time when it was committed. Mr Kovács further claims that his activities in 2014 do not fall within Section 261/A.

      Mr Kovács further argues that the surveillance conducted against him was unlawful, that there was a violation of the presumption of innocence, that Section 118(5) of Act CLXXXVI of 2013 criminalising espionage against the institutions of the EU was passed specifically in order to make Mr Kovács’ behaviour punishable and that the classification of the whole case is unlawful and unreasonable.

      Waiving immunity: in order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles. One of these principles is that immunity is usually waived when the offence falls within Article 9 of Protocol No 7, provided that there is no fumus persecutionis, i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned.  

      After exchanges of letters with the national authorities, it is considered that there is no fumus persecutionis in this case.

      More specifically as regards the argument based on the principle nullum crimen sine lege, it appears clearly from the statements of the Prosecutor General that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014, the date on which Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code entered into effect.

      On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 9(3) of the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommended that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Mr Béla Kovács.
    activities/1/docs/0/text

    • The European Parliament decided to waive the immunity of Béla KOVÁCS (NI, HU).

      Parliament recalled that the request for the waiver of the immunity of Béla Kovács is made in order that investigations can be carried out, on the basis of reasonable suspicions, to see whether a charge will lie against him with regard to the offence of espionage against the institutions of the European Union under Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code.

      According to that Section, any person who conducts intelligence activities for a non-European Union third country against the European Parliament, the European Commission or the Council of the European Union shall be punishable in accordance with Section 261; paragraph (1) of which provides that any person who conducts intelligence activities for a foreign power or foreign organisation against Hungary is guilty of a felony punishable by a term of imprisonment of between two and eight years.

      However, according to the information provided by the Prosecutor General, Mr Kovács’ covert contacts with Russian intelligence officers were first detected in 2010 by the Hungarian Constitution Protection Office in the course of its investigation into the activities of certain foreign nationals.

      The investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014.

      It is also noted that the criminal investigation will be carried out by the Central Chief Prosecution Office of Investigation and that under Article 29(1) of the Fundamental Law of Hungary, the Prosecutor-General and the Prosecution Service are independent, and shall carry out their constitutional tasks independently from external organisations, and proceed in compliance with the presumption of innocence.

      In order to decide whether or not to waive a Member’s parliamentary immunity, the European Parliament applies its own consistent principles. One of these principles is that immunity is usually waived when the offence falls within Article 9 of Protocol No 7, provided that there is no fumus persecutionis, i.e. a sufficiently serious and precise suspicion that the matter is being raised with the intention of causing political damage to the Member concerned.  

      It is considered that there is no fumus persecutionis in this case and that the investigation and any subsequent indictment for which the waiver of immunity is sought are limited to events having occurred after 1 January 2014, the date on which Section 261/A of Act C of 2012 on the Hungarian Criminal Code entered into effect.

      On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 9(3) of the Rules of Procedure, Parliament recommended that the parliamentary immunity of Mr Béla Kovács should be waived.
    2015-10-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/1
    date
    2015-10-14T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0356 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0356/2015
    body
    EP
    type
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    2015-10-21Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/0
    date
    2015-10-12T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0291&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0291/2015
    procedure/Modified legal basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    2014-08-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
    committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
    Old
    4de1898b0fb8127435bdc4c5
    New
    4f1adcd7b819f207b3000140
    2014-07-18Show (5) Changes
    activities
      committees
      • body: EP responsible: True committee: JURI date: 2014-07-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: ZWIEFKA Tadeusz
      links
      other
        procedure
        dossier_of_the_committee
        JURI/8/00713
        reference
        2014/2044(IMM)
        title
        Request for the waiver of parliamentary immunity of Béla Kovács
        legal_basis
        Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 006
        stage_reached
        Awaiting committee decision
        subtype
        Waiver of immunity
        type
        IMM - Members' immunity
        subject
        8.40.01.03 Members' immunity
        @parltrack
        @parltrack@eupolicy.social
        [javascript protected email address]
        code AGPLv3.0+
        data ODBLv1.0
        site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

        ParlTrack - 2011-2024

        © European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
        Hosted by AS250.net Foundation