BETA


2014/2197(INS) Motion of censure on the Commission

Progress: Procedure rejected

Legal Basis:
RoP 127

Events

2014/11/27
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2014/11/27
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament rejected a motion of censure against Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s team , by 461 votes to 101 with 88 abstentions.

The motion for censure was tabled by 76 EFDD and non-attached Members.

According to Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure , in order to dismiss the Commission, the motion needed to obtain a double majority : two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing a majority of the component Members of Parliament (i.e. 376).

Members backing the motion of censure complained that the EU Member States have lost billions of euros in potential tax revenues as a result of aggressive corporate tax avoidance schemes in Luxembourg, established during the period in which the new President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, held the office of Prime Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

They judged it unacceptable that a person responsible for putting in place aggressive tax avoidance policies should serve as President of the Commission. Therefore, they had proposed that Parliament adopt this motion of censure on the Commission.

2014/11/27
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2014/11/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2014/11/18
   EP - Motion of censure tabled for plenary
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

B8-0249/2014 - Résolution #

2014/11/27 Outcome: -: 461, +: 101, 0: 88
EL CY FI LU IE LV LT DK EE MT SK GB SI CZ HR NL AT HU SE BG PT IT BE PL FR RO ES DE
Total
12
2
10
5
9
7
8
12
6
6
13
62
8
20
11
22
17
18
18
15
19
60
17
47
65
26
46
88
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Lithuania EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
39

Netherlands NI

2
2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
61

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

Against (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Finland ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
169

Greece S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

For (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Sweden S&D

Abstain (1)

5
icon: PPE PPE
200

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2014-0249_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2014-0249_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141124&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2014-11-24-TOC_EN.html
events/2/type
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Decision by Parliament
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2014-0249&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2014-0249_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141124&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24951&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
    docs
    • date: 2014-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2014-0249&language=EN title: B8-0249/2014 type: Motion of censure tabled for plenary body: EP
    events
    • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141124&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24951&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The European Parliament rejected a motion of censure against Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s team , by 461 votes to 101 with 88 abstentions. The motion for censure was tabled by 76 EFDD and non-attached Members. According to Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure , in order to dismiss the Commission, the motion needed to obtain a double majority : two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing a majority of the component Members of Parliament (i.e. 376). Members backing the motion of censure complained that the EU Member States have lost billions of euros in potential tax revenues as a result of aggressive corporate tax avoidance schemes in Luxembourg, established during the period in which the new President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, held the office of Prime Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. They judged it unacceptable that a person responsible for putting in place aggressive tax avoidance policies should serve as President of the Commission. Therefore, they had proposed that Parliament adopt this motion of censure on the Commission.
    • date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 127
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 011
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 8.40.03 European Commission
      New
      8.40.03
      European Commission
      activities/1/docs
      • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=24951&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament
      activities/1/type
      Old
      Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
      New
      Results of vote in Parliament
      activities/1/text
      • The European Parliament rejected a motion of censure against Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s team, by 461 votes to 101 with 88 abstentions.

        The motion for censure was tabled by 76 EFDD and non-attached Members.

        According to Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure, in order to dismiss the Commission, the motion needed to obtain a double majority: two-thirds majority of the votes cast, representing a majority of the component Members of Parliament (i.e. 376).

        Members backing the motion of censure complained that the EU Member States have lost billions of euros in potential tax revenues as a result of aggressive corporate tax avoidance schemes in Luxembourg, established during the period in which the new President of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, held the office of Prime Minister of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

        They judged it unacceptable that a person responsible for putting in place aggressive tax avoidance policies should serve as President of the Commission. Therefore, they had proposed that Parliament adopt this motion of censure on the Commission.

      activities/1/type
      Old
      Vote scheduled
      New
      Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
      procedure/stage_reached
      Old
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      New
      Procedure rejected
      activities/1/type
      Old
      Vote in plenary scheduled
      New
      Vote scheduled
      activities/0/docs
      • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20141124&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
      activities/0/type
      Old
      Debate in plenary scheduled
      New
      Debate in Parliament
      activities
      • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
      • date: 2014-11-27T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          reference
          2014/2197(INS)
          title
          Motion of censure on the Commission
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 011
          stage_reached
          Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
          subtype
          Motion of censure
          type
          INS - Institutional procedure
          subject
          8.40.03 European Commission