BETA


2015/3013(RSP) Resolution on the role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2016/02/04
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/02/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/02/04
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Regional Development on the role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). Recalling that the partnership and multilevel governance principles , as set out in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council , are among the core principles of the five ESI Funds, Parliament stated that it was in favour of synergies and complementarity between the ESI Funds and other EU programmes, in which local and regional authorities can play a useful role in attaining the objectives of cohesion policy.

Although local and regional authorities were consulted in most cases during the negotiations on the partnership agreements and operational programmes, Members noted that their involvement did not amount to full partnership . They urged Member States, therefore, to fully comply with the requirements flowing from the reinforced partnership principle and European Code of Conduct on Partnership, and increase efforts to address deficiencies.

Parliament stressed that enhancing the administrative capacity and tackling the structural weaknesses of local and regional authorities are pivotal to both the programming and the implementation phases of the operational programmes and to achieving a higher absorption rate of ESI funds. The Commission was asked to ensure that support is provided for capacity building for local and regional authorities, especially in the event of sub-delegation of implementation tasks to lower levels of administration, in particular urban authorities.

In the current programming period 2014-2020, Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) and local actions groups are also eligible for financing under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Social Fund (ESF). Parliament highlighted the importance of the Community-Led Local Development initiative , in which local authorities are partners, and considered that the new Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) and CLLD initiatives represent step changes in the ability of local stakeholders to combine funding streams and plan well-targeted local initiatives.

Convinced that urban areas play an increasing role in today’s world, Parliament felt that the EU urban agenda can improve the development and implementation of policies and programmes, thus ensuring a more coherent impact on, and support for, cities, while contributing towards achieving common European and national objectives. It noted, however, that efforts to remove bottlenecks and inconsistencies should be applied to EU policies impacting on urban and rural areas alike.

The Commission was asked to continue to build upon previous and ongoing initiatives, including public consultations, in order to identify measures to strengthen the role of local and regional authorities in the management and implementation of the ESI Funds through the partnership agreements and operational programmes.

Documents
2016/02/04
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/02/01
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2016/01/26
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

events/1/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-02-04-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0171_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0171_EN.html
events/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160204&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/2
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0050_EN.html title: T8-0050/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-02-04T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0050_EN.html title: T8-0050/2016
summary
committees/0/date
    docs/1/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0171&language=EN
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0171_EN.html
    events/2/docs/0/url
    Old
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0050
    New
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0050_EN.html
    committees/0
    type
    Responsible Committee
    body
    EP
    committee_full
    Regional Development
    committee
    REGI
    associated
    False
    date
    committees/0
    body
    EP
    responsible
    True
    committee_full
    Regional Development
    committee
    REGI
    activities
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0050 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0050/2016
    commission
    • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
    docs
    • date: 2016-01-26T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0105/2016 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
    • date: 2016-02-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0171&language=EN title: B8-0171/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    events
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26812&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160204&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0050 title: T8-0050/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution tabled by the Committee on Regional Development on the role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). Recalling that the partnership and multilevel governance principles , as set out in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council , are among the core principles of the five ESI Funds, Parliament stated that it was in favour of synergies and complementarity between the ESI Funds and other EU programmes, in which local and regional authorities can play a useful role in attaining the objectives of cohesion policy. Although local and regional authorities were consulted in most cases during the negotiations on the partnership agreements and operational programmes, Members noted that their involvement did not amount to full partnership . They urged Member States, therefore, to fully comply with the requirements flowing from the reinforced partnership principle and European Code of Conduct on Partnership, and increase efforts to address deficiencies. Parliament stressed that enhancing the administrative capacity and tackling the structural weaknesses of local and regional authorities are pivotal to both the programming and the implementation phases of the operational programmes and to achieving a higher absorption rate of ESI funds. The Commission was asked to ensure that support is provided for capacity building for local and regional authorities, especially in the event of sub-delegation of implementation tasks to lower levels of administration, in particular urban authorities. In the current programming period 2014-2020, Community-Led Local Development (CLLD) and local actions groups are also eligible for financing under the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Social Fund (ESF). Parliament highlighted the importance of the Community-Led Local Development initiative , in which local authorities are partners, and considered that the new Integrated Territorial Investments (ITI) and CLLD initiatives represent step changes in the ability of local stakeholders to combine funding streams and plan well-targeted local initiatives. Convinced that urban areas play an increasing role in today’s world, Parliament felt that the EU urban agenda can improve the development and implementation of policies and programmes, thus ensuring a more coherent impact on, and support for, cities, while contributing towards achieving common European and national objectives. It noted, however, that efforts to remove bottlenecks and inconsistencies should be applied to EU policies impacting on urban and rural areas alike. The Commission was asked to continue to build upon previous and ongoing initiatives, including public consultations, in order to identify measures to strengthen the role of local and regional authorities in the management and implementation of the ESI Funds through the partnership agreements and operational programmes.
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    REGI/8/04855
    New
    • REGI/8/04855
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 4.70.01 Structural funds, investment funds in general, programmes
    New
    4.70.01
    Structural funds, investment funds in general, programmes
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    New
    Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0050 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0050/2016
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    New
    Debate in Parliament
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/title
    Old
    Role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF)
    New
    Resolution on the role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF)
    activities
    • date: 2016-02-04T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Regional Development committee: REGI
    links
    other
    • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
    procedure
    dossier_of_the_committee
    REGI/8/04855
    reference
    2015/3013(RSP)
    title
    Role of local and regional authorities in the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF)
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
    stage_reached
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    subtype
    Debate or resolution on oral questions
    type
    RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
    subject
    4.70.01 Structural funds, investment funds in general, programmes