BETA


2016/2550(RSP) Resolution on acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead REGI MIHAYLOVA Iskra (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 136-p5

Events

2016/09/23
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/05/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/05/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 546 votes to 73 with 62 abstentions, a resolution tabled by the Committee on Regional Development on acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy.

Members recalled that, with a budget of over EUR 350 billion until 202 0, cohesion policy represents the EU’s main investment and development policy covering all EU regions, and that in some Member States it forms the principal source of public investment.

Two years have passed since the start of the new programming period, and there have been delays in the implementation of cohesion policy. Operational programmes were mostly approved at the end of 2014 and in 2015, and a significant number of ex-ante conditionalities have not been fulfilled yet. However, it was important that Member States fulfil the actions on ex-ante conditionalities by the end of 2016 in order to ensure the smooth implementation of programmes and avoid possible suspension of interim payments.

Accelerate the implementation of programmes : Parliament called on the Commission to assess the state of play in the implementation of ESI Funds in the period 2014-2020 and prepare a detailed analysis on the risks of decommitment, with indicated amounts per Member State, and an analysis of payment forecasts submitted by Member States as soon as possible after the 31 January and 31 July deadlines set in the Common Provisions Regulation .

The Commission and Member States were asked to use the ESI Funds to their full potential and in line with the Europe 2020 strategy.

Welcoming the establishment of the Task Force for Better Implementation of the 2007‑2013 programmes in eight Member States, Parliament asked the Commission to continue with this Task Force to support and accelerate the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes in all Member States and to present to Parliament an action plan for the Task Force’s activities.

Strengthen administrative capacity and ensure simplification : Parliament pointed out that a lack of eligible projects is often associated with the lack of resources, which local and regional authorities need for the preparation of project documentation. It asked the Commission, therefore, to support the strengthening of administrative capacity for the policy implementation and evaluation stages, and to report to Parliament on actions that are planned in this regard.

It called on the Commission, for the 2014-2020 programming period, to provide, on the one hand, information on the obstacles that Member States are facing in implementing cohesion policy and, on the other, an assessment of the impact of carrying out the ex-ante conditionalities exercise on the effective implementation of the policy.

Bearing in mind that good governance can help to enhance absorption capacity, Members stressed the need to encourage relevant structural reforms , in line with territorial cohesion and sustainable growth and employment objectives, as well as investment-friendly policies and the fight against fraud. In this regard, they invited the Commission also to clarify the concept of performance-based budgeting with a view to increasing the efficiency of spending.

Parliament welcomed the setting-up of a High-Level Group of Independent Experts on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds by the Commission. It urged the Commission to speed up activities related to introducing simplified procedures even during the current programming period and to maintain a high level of transparency in cohesion policy.

Solve financing problems : bearing in mind that in many Member States the economic crisis has caused liquidity shortages and a lack of public funds available for public investments, Parliament asked the Commission to fully apply and use the existing flexibility under the Stability and Growth Pact. It asked the Commission to:

conduct a permanent dialogue with Member States which asked for the application of the current investment clause , with a view to maximising the flexibility relating to growth and jobs investments; encourage involvement of the EIB in the form of increased technical and financial support in the preparation and implementation of projects for any Member State that requires it.

Members considered that financial instruments, if implemented effectively on the basis of proper ex ante assessment and combined strategically with grants, could significantly increase the impact of financing. Clear, consistent and focused rules on Financial Instruments would help simplify the preparation and implementation process for fund managers and recipients, which recognise the different development levels of financial markets across the Member States, can help realise this ambition.

The Commission should also help further facilitate exchanges of best practice between Member States and regions on successful examples of sub delegation .

Lastly, Parliament highlighted the importance of timely payments to the proper and effective implementation and credibility of cohesion policy. It called on the Commission, therefore, to inform Parliament of measures envisaged to ensure full implementation of the Payment Plan in the context of the budget 2016 and also for the coming years.

Documents
2016/05/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/05/09
   EP - Oral question/interpellation by Parliament
Documents
2016/05/09
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2016/05/09
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2016/03/22
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/01/14
   EP - MIHAYLOVA Iskra (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI

Documents

Activities

Votes

B8-0562/2016 - § 6/2 #

2016/05/11 Outcome: +: 514, -: 123, 0: 50
DE PL RO ES IT NL GB BE BG CZ SK PT AT HU FR HR DK LT SE LV FI SI MT EE LU IE CY EL
Total
92
45
29
49
68
24
54
20
16
21
13
20
18
19
68
11
12
10
19
8
12
8
5
5
4
9
5
21
icon: PPE PPE
202

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

France NI

3
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

B8-0562/2016 - Considérant B/2 #

2016/05/11 Outcome: +: 511, -: 129, 0: 47
DE PL RO ES GB IT BE BG CZ SK NL PT HU FR HR LT SE DK FI LV AT SI MT EE IE LU CY EL
Total
93
44
29
49
55
68
19
16
20
13
24
20
19
68
11
10
19
12
13
8
18
8
5
5
9
4
5
21
icon: PPE PPE
202

Lithuania PPE

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
173
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

4

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
4

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

2
3

France NI

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
38

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

Against (1)

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

B8-0562/2016 - Résolution #

2016/05/11 Outcome: +: 546, -: 73, 0: 62
DE IT ES PL RO GB FR HU BE BG NL CZ SE PT FI AT SK HR LT LV SI IE EE MT LU DK CY EL
Total
92
68
48
44
29
54
68
19
19
16
24
21
18
20
13
17
12
11
10
8
8
9
5
5
4
11
5
21
icon: PPE PPE
202

Lithuania PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
170
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Slovakia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
13

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.428
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AM-580428_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0562_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0562_EN.html
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2016-05-09-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2016-05-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0217_EN.html title: T8-0217/2016
summary
events/2
date
2016-05-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0217_EN.html title: T8-0217/2016
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra date: 2016-01-14T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
date
2016-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0562&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-0562_EN.html
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0217
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0217_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0217 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0217/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
associated
False
date
2016-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
REGI
date
2016-01-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
docs
  • date: 2016-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE580.428 title: PE580.428 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 docs: title: B8-0364/2016 type: Oral question/interpellation by Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-0562&language=EN title: B8-0562/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2016-09-23T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27207&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)486 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-05-11T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27207&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-05-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0217 title: T8-0217/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 546 votes to 73 with 62 abstentions, a resolution tabled by the Committee on Regional Development on acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy. Members recalled that, with a budget of over EUR 350 billion until 202 0, cohesion policy represents the EU’s main investment and development policy covering all EU regions, and that in some Member States it forms the principal source of public investment. Two years have passed since the start of the new programming period, and there have been delays in the implementation of cohesion policy. Operational programmes were mostly approved at the end of 2014 and in 2015, and a significant number of ex-ante conditionalities have not been fulfilled yet. However, it was important that Member States fulfil the actions on ex-ante conditionalities by the end of 2016 in order to ensure the smooth implementation of programmes and avoid possible suspension of interim payments. Accelerate the implementation of programmes : Parliament called on the Commission to assess the state of play in the implementation of ESI Funds in the period 2014-2020 and prepare a detailed analysis on the risks of decommitment, with indicated amounts per Member State, and an analysis of payment forecasts submitted by Member States as soon as possible after the 31 January and 31 July deadlines set in the Common Provisions Regulation . The Commission and Member States were asked to use the ESI Funds to their full potential and in line with the Europe 2020 strategy. Welcoming the establishment of the Task Force for Better Implementation of the 2007‑2013 programmes in eight Member States, Parliament asked the Commission to continue with this Task Force to support and accelerate the implementation of the 2014-2020 programmes in all Member States and to present to Parliament an action plan for the Task Force’s activities. Strengthen administrative capacity and ensure simplification : Parliament pointed out that a lack of eligible projects is often associated with the lack of resources, which local and regional authorities need for the preparation of project documentation. It asked the Commission, therefore, to support the strengthening of administrative capacity for the policy implementation and evaluation stages, and to report to Parliament on actions that are planned in this regard. It called on the Commission, for the 2014-2020 programming period, to provide, on the one hand, information on the obstacles that Member States are facing in implementing cohesion policy and, on the other, an assessment of the impact of carrying out the ex-ante conditionalities exercise on the effective implementation of the policy. Bearing in mind that good governance can help to enhance absorption capacity, Members stressed the need to encourage relevant structural reforms , in line with territorial cohesion and sustainable growth and employment objectives, as well as investment-friendly policies and the fight against fraud. In this regard, they invited the Commission also to clarify the concept of performance-based budgeting with a view to increasing the efficiency of spending. Parliament welcomed the setting-up of a High-Level Group of Independent Experts on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds by the Commission. It urged the Commission to speed up activities related to introducing simplified procedures even during the current programming period and to maintain a high level of transparency in cohesion policy. Solve financing problems : bearing in mind that in many Member States the economic crisis has caused liquidity shortages and a lack of public funds available for public investments, Parliament asked the Commission to fully apply and use the existing flexibility under the Stability and Growth Pact. It asked the Commission to: conduct a permanent dialogue with Member States which asked for the application of the current investment clause , with a view to maximising the flexibility relating to growth and jobs investments; encourage involvement of the EIB in the form of increased technical and financial support in the preparation and implementation of projects for any Member State that requires it. Members considered that financial instruments, if implemented effectively on the basis of proper ex ante assessment and combined strategically with grants, could significantly increase the impact of financing. Clear, consistent and focused rules on Financial Instruments would help simplify the preparation and implementation process for fund managers and recipients, which recognise the different development levels of financial markets across the Member States, can help realise this ambition. The Commission should also help further facilitate exchanges of best practice between Member States and regions on successful examples of sub delegation . Lastly, Parliament highlighted the importance of timely payments to the proper and effective implementation and credibility of cohesion policy. It called on the Commission, therefore, to inform Parliament of measures envisaged to ensure full implementation of the Payment Plan in the context of the budget 2016 and also for the coming years.
  • date: 2016-05-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
REGI/8/05583
New
  • REGI/8/05583
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 136-p5
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
New
4.70.02
Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)
procedure/subtype
Old
Debate or resolution on oral questions
New
Debate or resolution on oral question/interpellation
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0217 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0217/2016
activities/1/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
procedure/title
Old
Acceleration of implementation of the cohesion policy
New
Resolution on acceleration of implementation of cohesion policy
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160509&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/0/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/1/date
Old
2016-05-10T00:00:00
New
2016-05-11T00:00:00
activities
  • date: 2016-05-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in plenary scheduled
  • date: 2016-05-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
committees
  • body: EP responsible: True committee: REGI date: 2016-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: ALDE name: MIHAYLOVA Iskra
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/regional_policy/index_en.htm title: Regional and Urban Policy commissioner: CREȚU Corina
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
REGI/8/05583
reference
2016/2550(RSP)
title
Acceleration of implementation of the cohesion policy
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 128-p5
stage_reached
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
subtype
Debate or resolution on oral questions
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subject
4.70.02 Cohesion policy, Cohesion Fund (CF)