BETA
Home MEPs Dossiers Committees Subjects Blog About Dumps
download json


2016/2921(RSP) Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 (MON-ØØ81Ø-6) seeds

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (icon: PPE PPE), BALAS Guillaume (icon: S&D S&D), STAES Bart (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), EVI Eleonora (icon: EFDD EFDD) HUITEMA Jan (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 112-p2

Events

2017/03/29
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
SP(2017)67
2016/10/06
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
B8-1086/2016
2016/10/06
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
Results of vote in Parliament
2016/10/06
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 371 votes to 189, with 40 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 (MON-ØØ81Ø-6) seeds (D046170/00).

The resolution was tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.

Parliament was concerned that the genetically modified maize MON 810 may harm non-targeted lepidopteran species . It also questioned the principle of ‘ acceptable local mortality ’ of non-targeted Lepidoptera, introduced by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

In its draft implementing decision the Commission claims that, as regards local mortality, EFSA considered two levels of ‘acceptable’ local mortality (0.5 % and 1 %).

However, in its scientific opinion adopted on 28 May 2015 updating risk management recommendations to limit exposure of non-target Lepidoptera of conservation concern in protected habitats to Bt-maize pollen, EFSA actually clearly states that ‘any specific protection level used here for illustration by the EFSA GMO Panel is intended as an example only’ and that ‘any threshold applied must, by necessity, be arbitrary and should be subject to amendment according to the protection goals in operation within the EU’.

Members noted the following points:

in its draft implementing decision, the Commission chose the level of local mortality of below 0.5 % and provides in its annex for arbitrary isolation distances of at least 5 metres between a MON 810 maize field and a protected habitat, despite the fact that EFSA clearly states, as confirmed, that imposing an isolation distance of 20 metres around a protected habitat from the nearest crop of maize Bt11/MON 810, which is four times further than the distance proposed by the Commission: EFSA arbitrarily excluded cross-pollination in maize from the scope of its scientific opinions on MON 810 maize, thereby overlooking the potential risks to biological diversity; in its scientific opinion adopted on 28 May 2015, EFSA stated that currently, there are insufficient data available to allow Bt-related larval mortality to be put into the context of overall mortality; there is a record of continuous lack of enforcement of post-market environmental monitoring, as EFSA observes that the 2014 PMEM report shows partial non-compliance with the implementation of non-Bt refugia in Spain as observed in previous years; the EFSA GMO Panel strongly reiterates in vain each year its recommendations on MON 810 post-market environmental monitoring, namely to provide more detailed information on the sampling methodology , as well as the importance of national GMO cultivation registers.

On this basis, Parliament considered that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed. It also considered the risk assessment on the cultivation conducted by EFSA to be incomplete and the risk management recommendations proposed by the Commission to be inadequate.

Accordingly, it called on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision .

Documents
T8-0388/2016
2016/10/06
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/09/20
   EP - PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2016/09/20
   EP - BALAS Guillaume (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2016/09/20
   EP - STAES Bart (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2016/09/20
   EP - EVI Eleonora (EFDD) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Activities

Votes

B8-1086/2016 - Résolution #

2016/10/06 Outcome: +: 371, -: 189, 0: 40
IT FR EL AT PL HU DE ES HR SI PT LV CY MT BE RO LU DK SE BG FI SK LT IE NL EE CZ GB
Total
61
61
17
18
43
16
81
44
9
7
17
6
5
5
17
24
6
8
15
14
10
12
8
8
21
3
16
47
icon: S&D S&D
153

Italy S&D

Abstain (1)

Paolo DE CASTRO
28

France S&D

11

Greece S&D

4

Austria S&D

5

Poland S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Germany S&D

22

Spain S&D

11

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

Tanja FAJON
1

Portugal S&D

5

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Belgium S&D

4

Romania S&D

12

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

Mady DELVAUX
1

Denmark S&D

3

Sweden S&D

5

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

Georgi PIRINSKI

Abstain (1)

Momchil NEKOV
2

Finland S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

Nessa CHILDERS
1

Netherlands S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

United Kingdom S&D

17
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

4

Greece GUE/NGL

5

Germany GUE/NGL

7

Spain GUE/NGL

11

Portugal GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

Malin BJÖRK
1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

Merja KYLLÖNEN
1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

France Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Germany Verts/ALE

11

Spain Verts/ALE

4

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Davor ŠKRLEC
1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Igor ŠOLTES
1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

Claude TURMES
1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

Margrete AUKEN
1

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

Heidi HAUTALA
1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

Bronis ROPĖ
1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

Indrek TARAND
1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3
icon: ENF ENF
31

Italy ENF

5

France ENF

15

Austria ENF

4

Poland ENF

For (1)

Michał MARUSIK
1

Germany ENF

For (1)

Marcus PRETZELL
1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

Gerolf ANNEMANS
1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
35

Italy EFDD

15

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

Rolandas PAKSAS
1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

Petr MACH
1

United Kingdom EFDD

15
icon: ECR ECR
49

Italy ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

Notis MARIAS
1

Poland ECR

17

Germany ECR

For (1)

Arne GERICKE
5

Croatia ECR

For (1)

Ruža TOMAŠIĆ
1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

Roberts ZĪLE
1

Belgium ECR

Against (1)

Mark DEMESMAEKER
1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

Monica MACOVEI
1

Denmark ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

Jussi HALLA-AHO
2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Richard SULÍK
3

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Bas BELDER
1

Czechia ECR

2

United Kingdom ECR

Abstain (1)

James NICHOLSON
9
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

Against (1)

Aymeric CHAUPRADE
1

Greece NI

4

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Udo VOIGT

Against (1)

Martin SONNEBORN
2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Diane DODDS
1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

France ALDE

6

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

Angelika MLINAR
1

Germany ALDE

4

Spain ALDE

Abstain (1)

Maite PAGAZAURTUNDÚA
7

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Ivan JAKOVČIĆ

Against (1)

Jozo RADOŠ
2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

Ivo VAJGL
1

Portugal ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Belgium ALDE

For (1)

Gérard DEPREZ

Abstain (1)

Frédérique RIES
6

Romania ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

Charles GOERENS
1

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

Iskra MIHAYLOVA
4

Finland ALDE

3

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS

Abstain (1)

Viktor USPASKICH
3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

Marian HARKIN
1

Netherlands ALDE

6

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

Urmas PAET
1

Czechia ALDE

4

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

Catherine BEARDER
1
icon: PPE PPE
173

Italy PPE

9

France PPE

19

Greece PPE

3

Austria PPE

5

Poland PPE

21

Hungary PPE

Against (1)

László TŐKÉS
9

Germany PPE

For (1)

Joachim ZELLER
29

Spain PPE

11

Croatia PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

4

Portugal PPE

Abstain (1)

Carlos COELHO
6

Latvia PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Malta PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Tom VANDENKENDELAERE
3

Romania PPE

8

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

Frank ENGEL
3

Sweden PPE

3

Bulgaria PPE

6

Finland PPE

1

Slovakia PPE

6

Lithuania PPE

2

Ireland PPE

4

Netherlands PPE

5

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

Tunne KELAM
1

Czechia PPE

5

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

2021-12-18Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0/rapporteur/2
name
BOYLAN Lynn
date
2016-09-20T00:00:00
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-1086_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-1086_EN.html
events/1
date
2016-10-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0388_EN.html title: T8-0388/2016
summary
events/1
date
2016-10-06T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0388_EN.html title: T8-0388/2016
summary
2020-01-19Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-1086&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-1086_EN.html
docs/1/body
EC
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0388
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0388_EN.html
2019-09-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
rapporteur
shadows
name: HUITEMA Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
name: HUITEMA Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
2019-07-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
name: HUITEMA Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
name: HUITEMA Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
2019-07-06Show (12) Changes | Timetravel
activities
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0388 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0388/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
rapporteur
shadows
name: HUITEMA Jan group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
group: ALDE name: HUITEMA Jan
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
docs
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-1086&language=EN title: B8-1086/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-29T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27676&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)67 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27676&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0388 title: T8-0388/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 371 votes to 189, with 40 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 (MON-ØØ81Ø-6) seeds (D046170/00). The resolution was tabled by the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Parliament was concerned that the genetically modified maize MON 810 may harm non-targeted lepidopteran species . It also questioned the principle of ‘ acceptable local mortality ’ of non-targeted Lepidoptera, introduced by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). In its draft implementing decision the Commission claims that, as regards local mortality, EFSA considered two levels of ‘acceptable’ local mortality (0.5 % and 1 %). However, in its scientific opinion adopted on 28 May 2015 updating risk management recommendations to limit exposure of non-target Lepidoptera of conservation concern in protected habitats to Bt-maize pollen, EFSA actually clearly states that ‘any specific protection level used here for illustration by the EFSA GMO Panel is intended as an example only’ and that ‘any threshold applied must, by necessity, be arbitrary and should be subject to amendment according to the protection goals in operation within the EU’. Members noted the following points: in its draft implementing decision, the Commission chose the level of local mortality of below 0.5 % and provides in its annex for arbitrary isolation distances of at least 5 metres between a MON 810 maize field and a protected habitat, despite the fact that EFSA clearly states, as confirmed, that imposing an isolation distance of 20 metres around a protected habitat from the nearest crop of maize Bt11/MON 810, which is four times further than the distance proposed by the Commission: EFSA arbitrarily excluded cross-pollination in maize from the scope of its scientific opinions on MON 810 maize, thereby overlooking the potential risks to biological diversity; in its scientific opinion adopted on 28 May 2015, EFSA stated that currently, there are insufficient data available to allow Bt-related larval mortality to be put into the context of overall mortality; there is a record of continuous lack of enforcement of post-market environmental monitoring, as EFSA observes that the 2014 PMEM report shows partial non-compliance with the implementation of non-Bt refugia in Spain as observed in previous years; the EFSA GMO Panel strongly reiterates in vain each year its recommendations on MON 810 post-market environmental monitoring, namely to provide more detailed information on the sampling methodology , as well as the importance of national GMO cultivation registers. On this basis, Parliament considered that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on genetically modified food and feed. It also considered the risk assessment on the cultivation conducted by EFSA to be incomplete and the risk management recommendations proposed by the Commission to be inadequate. Accordingly, it called on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision .
  • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    ENVI/8/07688
    New
    • ENVI/8/07688
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 112-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 106-p2
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.10.09.06 Agro-genetics, GMOs
    New
    3.10.09.06
    Agro-genetics, GMOs
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Comitology resolution
    New
    Resolution on implementing act or powers
    2016-10-08Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0388 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0388/2016
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/title
    Old
    Renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 (MON-ØØ81Ø-6) seeds
    New
    Resolution on the draft Commission implementing decision renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 (MON-ØØ81Ø-6) seeds
    2016-10-06Show (5) Changes
    activities
    • date: 2016-10-06T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: ALDE name: HUITEMA Jan responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2016-09-20T00:00:00 2016-09-20T00:00:00 2016-09-20T00:00:00 2016-09-20T00:00:00 2016-09-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: BALAS Guillaume group: GUE/NGL name: BOYLAN Lynn group: Verts/ALE name: STAES Bart group: EFD name: EVI Eleonora
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      ENVI/8/07688
      reference
      2016/2921(RSP)
      title
      Renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified maize MON 810 (MON-ØØ81Ø-6) seeds
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 106-p2
      stage_reached
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      subtype
      Comitology resolution
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject
      3.10.09.06 Agro-genetics, GMOs
      @parltrack
      @parltrack@eupolicy.social
      [javascript protected email address]
      code AGPLv3.0+
      data ODBLv1.0
      site content CC-By-Sa-3.0

      ParlTrack - 2011-2024

      © European Union, 2011 – Source: European Parliament
      Hosted by AS250.net Foundation