BETA


2016/2978(RSP) Resolution on the draft Commission implementing regulation renewing approval of the active substance bentazone

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI POC Pavel (icon: S&D S&D)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 112-p2

Events

2017/03/22
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2016/11/23
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2016/11/23
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 361 votes to 289, with 28 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Commission implementing regulation renewing approval of the active substance bentazone in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011.

The resolution was tabled by the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety.

Background : the approval period for the active substance bentazone expired on 30 June 2017. The draft Commission implementing regulation renewing approval of the active substance bentazone provides, on the basis of a scientific evaluation conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), for the authorisation of bentazone until 31 January 2032 , i.e. for the longest possible period.

Members recalled that following consideration of the comments received on the RAR, it was concluded that EFSA should conduct an expert consultation in the areas of mammalian toxicology, residues, environmental fate and behaviour, and ecotoxicology and should adopt a conclusion on whether the active substance bentazone could be expected to meet the conditions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 .

Data gaps : Members stressed that the consumer risk assessment was not finalised because the proposed residue definitions for risk assessment in plants and for enforcement in livestock were considered as provisional owing to the identified data gaps. In addition, the groundwater exposure assessment for the parent bentazone and metabolite Nmethyl-bentazone was not finalised.

Moreover, the EFSA peer review proposed that the active substance bentazone be classified as toxic for reproduction category 2 .

On the basis of these consideration, Members considered the assessment on the representative uses of active substance bentazone to be insufficient to conclude that, for at least one of the representative uses, a plant product containing the active substance bentazone may be expected not to have any harmful effect on human or animal health or on groundwater or any unacceptable influence on the environment.

Therefore, Parliament called on the Commission to give priority to requesting and assessing any relevant missing information before taking a decision on approval.

It called on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing regulation and to submit a new draft to the committee.

The Commission and the Member States are called upon to finance research and innovation in the area of alternative sustainable and cost-efficient solutions for pest-management products with a view to ensuring a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment.

Documents
2016/11/23
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2016/11/21
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2016/10/25
   EP - POC Pavel (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Activities

Votes

B8-1228/2016 - Résolution #

2016/11/23 Outcome: +: 361, -: 289, 0: 28
FR IT AT EL RO SE BE MT LU LT FI EE DK BG PT IE HR NL LV DE CY CZ SI SK HU ES GB PL
Total
67
65
18
18
32
18
20
6
4
10
13
5
10
15
19
9
11
24
6
87
5
19
8
13
17
50
59
49
icon: S&D S&D
171

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
62

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Sweden ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

3

Czechia ALDE

For (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
2
icon: NI NI
12

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Poland NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
36

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Denmark ECR

3

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
201

Belgium PPE

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-1228_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-1228_EN.html
events/1
date
2016-11-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0443_EN.html title: T8-0443/2016
summary
events/1
date
2016-11-23T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0443_EN.html title: T8-0443/2016
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-1228&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2016-1228_EN.html
docs/1/body
EC
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0443
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0443_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
rapporteur
name: POC Pavel date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
2016-10-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: POC Pavel group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
activities
  • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0443 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0443/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
associated
False
date
2016-10-25T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: POC Pavel group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
True
committee
ENVI
date
2016-10-25T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: S&D name: POC Pavel
docs
  • date: 2016-11-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2016-1228&language=EN title: B8-1228/2016 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2017-03-22T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27864&j=0&l=en title: SP(2017)148 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27864&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0443 title: T8-0443/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 361 votes to 289, with 28 abstentions, a resolution on the draft Commission implementing regulation renewing approval of the active substance bentazone in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011. The resolution was tabled by the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Background : the approval period for the active substance bentazone expired on 30 June 2017. The draft Commission implementing regulation renewing approval of the active substance bentazone provides, on the basis of a scientific evaluation conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), for the authorisation of bentazone until 31 January 2032 , i.e. for the longest possible period. Members recalled that following consideration of the comments received on the RAR, it was concluded that EFSA should conduct an expert consultation in the areas of mammalian toxicology, residues, environmental fate and behaviour, and ecotoxicology and should adopt a conclusion on whether the active substance bentazone could be expected to meet the conditions laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 . Data gaps : Members stressed that the consumer risk assessment was not finalised because the proposed residue definitions for risk assessment in plants and for enforcement in livestock were considered as provisional owing to the identified data gaps. In addition, the groundwater exposure assessment for the parent bentazone and metabolite Nmethyl-bentazone was not finalised. Moreover, the EFSA peer review proposed that the active substance bentazone be classified as toxic for reproduction category 2 . On the basis of these consideration, Members considered the assessment on the representative uses of active substance bentazone to be insufficient to conclude that, for at least one of the representative uses, a plant product containing the active substance bentazone may be expected not to have any harmful effect on human or animal health or on groundwater or any unacceptable influence on the environment. Therefore, Parliament called on the Commission to give priority to requesting and assessing any relevant missing information before taking a decision on approval. It called on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing regulation and to submit a new draft to the committee. The Commission and the Member States are called upon to finance research and innovation in the area of alternative sustainable and cost-efficient solutions for pest-management products with a view to ensuring a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment.
  • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    ENVI/8/08110
    New
    • ENVI/8/08110
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 112-p2
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 010
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.40.01 Chemical industry, fertilizers, plastics
    • 3.70.13 Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
    New
    3.40.01
    Chemical industry, fertilizers, plastics
    3.70.13
    Dangerous substances, toxic and radioactive wastes (storage, transport)
    procedure/subtype
    Old
    Comitology resolution
    New
    • Resolution on implementing act or powers
    • See also Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 2006/0136(COD)
    procedure/title
    Old
    Renewing the approval of the active substance bentazone
    New
    Resolution on the draft Commission implementing regulation renewing approval of the active substance bentazone
    activities/0/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0443 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0443/2016
    activities/0/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities
    • date: 2016-11-23T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in plenary scheduled
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee: ENVI date: 2016-10-25T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: S&D name: POC Pavel
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      ENVI/8/08110
      reference
      2016/2978(RSP)
      title
      Renewing the approval of the active substance bentazone
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 010
      stage_reached
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      subtype
      Comitology resolution
      type
      RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
      subject