BETA


2017/3001(RSP) Resolution on freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 144

Events

2017/12/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/12/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/12/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa.

The text adopted in plenary was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens/EFA and EFDD groups.

Nguyen Van Hoa, a 22 year-old videographer and blogger, was detained by the police without an official warrant and arrested under Article 258 of the Vietnamese Penal Code and charged with ‘abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the state’.

In April 2017, these charges were upgraded to a violation of Article 88 on propaganda which has been widely used against human rights defenders (HRDs) who have highlighted abuses in Vietnam.

On 27 November 2017, Nguyen Van Hoa was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for having disseminated online information, including videos, on the environmental disaster in Ha Tinh Province that took place in April 2016, when Formosa Ha Tinh, a Taiwanese steel company, caused an illegal discharge of toxic industrial waste into the ocean, killing marine life and making people ill.

The People’s Court of Ha Tinh Province found Nguyen Van Hoa guilty of producing propaganda against the state under Article 88 of the Penal Code. He was not permitted access to a lawyer to represent him at the hearing.

Parliament condemned the sentencing of Nguyen Van Hoa to seven years in prison and stressed that Nguyen Van Hoa had exercised his right to freedom of expression.

Therefore, it urged the Vietnamese authorities to release Nguyen Van Hoa immediately and unconditionally .

Parliament expressed its concern about the rise in the number of detentions, arrests and convictions of Vietnamese citizens related to the expression of their opinions. Concern was also expressed at the restrictions placed on freedom of movement to prevent bloggers and activists from participating in public events such as human rights discussions and attending trials of fellow activists.

In this regard, the Vietnamese authorities are called on to:

release all citizens detained for peacefully exercising their freedom of expression; end all restrictions on and acts of harassment against HDRs and to guarantee in all circumstances that they are able to carry out their legitimate human rights activities without fear of reprisals and free of all restrictions including judicial harassment; establish a moratorium on the death penalty as a first step towards the abolition of capital punishment for all crimes; address the environmental disaster in the Ha Tinh Province through legislative measures aimed at restoring and rehabilitating the local economy; amend certain articles in its Penal Code, including Article 88 on propaganda and Article 79 on activities aimed at overthrowing the administration, which have been denounced by the OHCHR as being in breach of international human rights law.

While welcoming the strengthened partnership and Human Rights Dialogue between the EU and Vietnam, Parliament encouraged the Commission to monitor progress under the Dialogue through the introduction of benchmarks and monitoring mechanisms.

Lastly, the Commission and the VP/HR are urged to continue to raise the issue of freedom of expression in its regular dialogue with Vietnam, including during the next Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Summit in Brussels in 2018.

Documents
2017/12/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/12/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2017/12/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2017/12/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2017/12/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2017/12/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2017/12/13
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents

Documents

Activities

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0685_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0685_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0687_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0687_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0688_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0688_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0690_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0690_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0693_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0693_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2017-0685_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2017-0685_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171214&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2017-12-14-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2017-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0496_EN.html title: T8-0496/2017
summary
events/2
date
2017-12-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0496_EN.html title: T8-0496/2017
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0685&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0685_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0687&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0687_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0688&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0688_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0690&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0690_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0693&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2017-0693_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2017-0685&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2017-0685_EN.html
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0496
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0496_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Debate in Parliament docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0496 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0496/2017
committees
    docs
    • date: 2017-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0685&language=EN title: B8-0685/2017 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2017-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0687&language=EN title: B8-0687/2017 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2017-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0688&language=EN title: B8-0688/2017 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2017-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0690&language=EN title: B8-0690/2017 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2017-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2017-0693&language=EN title: B8-0693/2017 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
    • date: 2017-12-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2017-0685&language=EN title: RC-B8-0685/2017 type: Joint motion for resolution
    events
    • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=30586&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
    • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20171214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
    • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0496 title: T8-0496/2017 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa. The text adopted in plenary was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens/EFA and EFDD groups. Nguyen Van Hoa, a 22 year-old videographer and blogger, was detained by the police without an official warrant and arrested under Article 258 of the Vietnamese Penal Code and charged with ‘abusing democratic freedoms to infringe upon the interests of the state’. In April 2017, these charges were upgraded to a violation of Article 88 on propaganda which has been widely used against human rights defenders (HRDs) who have highlighted abuses in Vietnam. On 27 November 2017, Nguyen Van Hoa was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment for having disseminated online information, including videos, on the environmental disaster in Ha Tinh Province that took place in April 2016, when Formosa Ha Tinh, a Taiwanese steel company, caused an illegal discharge of toxic industrial waste into the ocean, killing marine life and making people ill. The People’s Court of Ha Tinh Province found Nguyen Van Hoa guilty of producing propaganda against the state under Article 88 of the Penal Code. He was not permitted access to a lawyer to represent him at the hearing. Parliament condemned the sentencing of Nguyen Van Hoa to seven years in prison and stressed that Nguyen Van Hoa had exercised his right to freedom of expression. Therefore, it urged the Vietnamese authorities to release Nguyen Van Hoa immediately and unconditionally . Parliament expressed its concern about the rise in the number of detentions, arrests and convictions of Vietnamese citizens related to the expression of their opinions. Concern was also expressed at the restrictions placed on freedom of movement to prevent bloggers and activists from participating in public events such as human rights discussions and attending trials of fellow activists. In this regard, the Vietnamese authorities are called on to: release all citizens detained for peacefully exercising their freedom of expression; end all restrictions on and acts of harassment against HDRs and to guarantee in all circumstances that they are able to carry out their legitimate human rights activities without fear of reprisals and free of all restrictions including judicial harassment; establish a moratorium on the death penalty as a first step towards the abolition of capital punishment for all crimes; address the environmental disaster in the Ha Tinh Province through legislative measures aimed at restoring and rehabilitating the local economy; amend certain articles in its Penal Code, including Article 88 on propaganda and Article 79 on activities aimed at overthrowing the administration, which have been denounced by the OHCHR as being in breach of international human rights law. While welcoming the strengthened partnership and Human Rights Dialogue between the EU and Vietnam, Parliament encouraged the Commission to monitor progress under the Dialogue through the introduction of benchmarks and monitoring mechanisms. Lastly, the Commission and the VP/HR are urged to continue to raise the issue of freedom of expression in its regular dialogue with Vietnam, including during the next Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) Summit in Brussels in 2018.
    • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
    links
    other
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure EP 144
      procedure/legal_basis/0
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 135
      procedure/subject
      Old
      • 6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general
      New
      6.10.08
      Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general
      activities/0/docs
      • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2017-0496 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0496/2017
      procedure/stage_reached
      Old
      Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
      New
      Procedure completed
      activities/0/type
      Old
      Debate in plenary scheduled
      New
      Debate in Parliament
      procedure/title
      Old
      Freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa
      New
      Resolution on freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa
      activities/0/type
      Old
      Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
      New
      Debate in plenary scheduled
      activities
      • date: 2017-12-14T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
      committees
        links
        other
          procedure
          geographical_area
          Vietnam
          reference
          2017/3001(RSP)
          title
          Freedom of expression in Vietnam, notably the case of Nguyen Van Hoa
          legal_basis
          Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 135
          stage_reached
          Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
          subtype
          Urgent debate or resolution
          type
          RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
          subject
          6.10.08 Fundamental freedoms, human rights, democracy in general