BETA


2019/2563(RSP) Resolution on Zimbabwe

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 144

Events

2019/02/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/02/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/02/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Zimbabwe.

The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens/EFA and EFDD groups.

Parliament strongly condemned the violence that occurred during the recent protests in Zimbabwe in January this year, noting that more than 17 people have been killed, hundreds injured, and around one thousand people arrested, including children aged between 9 and 16. The protests followed a 150 % increase in fuel prices, and were also in response to rising poverty, the poor state of the economy, and declining living standards. The outcome of the first presidential and parliamentary elections held in the country on July 2018 had also resulted in an outbreak of post electoral violence that left six people dead and many injured during protests called by the opposition. Members noted that international observers, including the EU, condemned the violence and the excessive use of force by the army and internal security forces. The final report of the EU Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) stated that the figures presented by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC), which declared Emmerson Mnangagwa winner with 50.8 % of votes, contained many anomalies and inaccuracies and raised enough questions to lead to doubts as to the accuracy and reliability of the numbers presented.

Human rights and excessive use of force

Members urged the Government of Zimbabwe to release all political prisoners and withdraw urgently all military personnel and the youth militia deployed across the country that are terrorising residents, and to put an immediate end to abuses by security forces and to promptly and impartially investigate all allegations of excessive use of force by police and state officials. They pointed to the fact that the police have continuously misused existing laws, such as the Public Order and Security Act (POSA), to justify the curb on opposition members and human rights activists, and to ban lawful and peaceful demonstrations. Furthermore, evidence shows that the army has been largely responsible for the acts of murder, rape and armed robbery. Parliament called on the Zimbabwean authorities to undertake a prompt, thorough, impartial and independent investigation into allegations of human rights violations and abuses, including rape and sexual violence by security forces, and to bring those responsible to justice. It added that it was deeply concerned about reported violations of due process through fast-tracking and mass trials.

Review of restricted measures

Members called on the European Council to review its restrictive measures against individuals and entities in Zimbabwe, including those measures currently suspended, in the light of accountability for recent state violence, and referred to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/288 amending Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe.

Cotonou Agreement

Parliament reminded the Government of Zimbabwe that the support of the European Union and its Member States in the context of the Cotonou Agreement, and for trade, development, and economic assistance, is conditional on its respecting the rule of law and the international conventions and treaties to which it is party, including the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders. It recalled that long-term support hinges on comprehensive reforms rather than mere promises and called on the EU to step up its political dialogue with Zimbabwe on human rights on the basis of Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement.

Recommendations of EU EOM

Parliament called on the government to fully implement the recommendations made by the EU EOM, especially with regard to the rule of law and an inclusive political environment, which are set out in the letter of 10 October 2018 from the Chief Observer to President Mnangagwa. These include (i) creating a level playing field for all political parties; (ii) strengthening ZEC by making it truly independent and transparent, thereby restoring confidence in the electoral process; (iii) ensuring that strengthening ZEC’s independence makes it free from governmental oversight in the approval of its regulations; and (iv) creating a more inclusive electoral process;

Internet shutdown

The resolution condemned the internet shutdown that allowed the authorities to conceal the human rights abuses committed by the army and internal security forces and to obstruct independent reporting and documentation of abuses during the crackdown and immediately after the election. It pointed out that the Zimbabwe High Court declared that the use of the Interception of Communications Act to suspend online communications was illegal, noting that the interruption of telecommunications has become a tool used by the regime to block the coordination of demonstrations organised on social networks, and to prevent access to information in order to mask the massive human rights violations which the state was preparing to commit.

Lastly, Parliament called on the EU delegation and EU Member State embassies in Zimbabwe to continue their close monitoring of developments in the country and to use all appropriate tools to support human rights defenders, civil society organisations and trade unions, to promote the essential elements of the Cotonou Agreement and to support pro-democracy movements.

Documents
2019/02/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

RC-B8-0110/2019 - Am 7 14/02/2019 12:04:10.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: -: 481, +: 70, 0: 14
CY EE LU DK MT LV HU EL LT IE SI BE SK AT SE HR BG CZ FI NL PT FR RO GB IT PL ES DE
Total
1
3
4
11
5
6
11
13
7
7
7
16
10
17
9
9
14
18
12
24
18
59
23
51
52
43
41
74
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Italy NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
56

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
40

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

Against (2)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: S&D S&D
133

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3
3

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
161

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

1

RC-B8-0110/2019 - Am 9 14/02/2019 12:04:26.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: -: 483, +: 67, 0: 22
CY EE DK LU MT HU EL LT LV IE BE SI SE HR AT SK BG FI NL IT CZ PT FR RO GB PL ES DE
Total
1
3
11
5
5
10
13
7
7
7
16
8
9
9
18
11
14
12
24
52
18
18
61
22
52
42
41
75
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
32

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
57

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Bulgaria ECR

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
56

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
133
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Hungary S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
162

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

RC-B8-0110/2019 - Am 10 14/02/2019 12:04:37.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: -: 502, +: 51, 0: 28
EE DK LU MT LT LV IE SI SE HR HU BE FI SK BG AT EL IT CZ NL PT RO GB FR PL ES DE
Total
4
11
5
5
7
7
7
8
9
9
12
16
11
12
14
18
14
52
18
24
18
23
53
61
43
41
78
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
16

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
44

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
59

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

3

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
55

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: S&D S&D
137
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (2)

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Belgium S&D

3

Finland S&D

2
3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
165

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Lithuania PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Sweden PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

1
2

United Kingdom PPE

2

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0110_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0110_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0118_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0118_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0119_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0119_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0120_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0120_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0122_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0122_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0124_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0124_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0125_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0125_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0110_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0110_EN.html
events/0
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/0
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32265&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/1
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/1
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0116_EN.html title: T8-0116/2019
summary
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-02-14-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0116_EN.html title: T8-0116/2019
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0110&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0110_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0118&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0118_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0119&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0119_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0120&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0120_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0122&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0122_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0124&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0124_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0125&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0125_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2019-0110&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0110_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0116
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0116_EN.html
docs
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0110&language=EN title: B8-0110/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0118&language=EN title: B8-0118/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0119&language=EN title: B8-0119/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0120&language=EN title: B8-0120/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0122&language=EN title: B8-0122/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0124&language=EN title: B8-0124/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0125&language=EN title: B8-0125/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2019-0110&language=EN title: RC-B8-0110/2019 type: Joint motion for resolution
events
  • date: 2019-02-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-02-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0116 title: T8-0116/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Zimbabwe. The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, Greens/EFA and EFDD groups. Parliament strongly condemned the violence that occurred during the recent protests in Zimbabwe in January this year, noting that more than 17 people have been killed, hundreds injured, and around one thousand people arrested, including children aged between 9 and 16. The protests followed a 150 % increase in fuel prices, and were also in response to rising poverty, the poor state of the economy, and declining living standards. The outcome of the first presidential and parliamentary elections held in the country on July 2018 had also resulted in an outbreak of post electoral violence that left six people dead and many injured during protests called by the opposition. Members noted that international observers, including the EU, condemned the violence and the excessive use of force by the army and internal security forces. The final report of the EU Election Observation Mission (EU EOM) stated that the figures presented by the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC), which declared Emmerson Mnangagwa winner with 50.8 % of votes, contained many anomalies and inaccuracies and raised enough questions to lead to doubts as to the accuracy and reliability of the numbers presented. Human rights and excessive use of force Members urged the Government of Zimbabwe to release all political prisoners and withdraw urgently all military personnel and the youth militia deployed across the country that are terrorising residents, and to put an immediate end to abuses by security forces and to promptly and impartially investigate all allegations of excessive use of force by police and state officials. They pointed to the fact that the police have continuously misused existing laws, such as the Public Order and Security Act (POSA), to justify the curb on opposition members and human rights activists, and to ban lawful and peaceful demonstrations. Furthermore, evidence shows that the army has been largely responsible for the acts of murder, rape and armed robbery. Parliament called on the Zimbabwean authorities to undertake a prompt, thorough, impartial and independent investigation into allegations of human rights violations and abuses, including rape and sexual violence by security forces, and to bring those responsible to justice. It added that it was deeply concerned about reported violations of due process through fast-tracking and mass trials. Review of restricted measures Members called on the European Council to review its restrictive measures against individuals and entities in Zimbabwe, including those measures currently suspended, in the light of accountability for recent state violence, and referred to Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/288 amending Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe. Cotonou Agreement Parliament reminded the Government of Zimbabwe that the support of the European Union and its Member States in the context of the Cotonou Agreement, and for trade, development, and economic assistance, is conditional on its respecting the rule of law and the international conventions and treaties to which it is party, including the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders. It recalled that long-term support hinges on comprehensive reforms rather than mere promises and called on the EU to step up its political dialogue with Zimbabwe on human rights on the basis of Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement. Recommendations of EU EOM Parliament called on the government to fully implement the recommendations made by the EU EOM, especially with regard to the rule of law and an inclusive political environment, which are set out in the letter of 10 October 2018 from the Chief Observer to President Mnangagwa. These include (i) creating a level playing field for all political parties; (ii) strengthening ZEC by making it truly independent and transparent, thereby restoring confidence in the electoral process; (iii) ensuring that strengthening ZEC’s independence makes it free from governmental oversight in the approval of its regulations; and (iv) creating a more inclusive electoral process; Internet shutdown The resolution condemned the internet shutdown that allowed the authorities to conceal the human rights abuses committed by the army and internal security forces and to obstruct independent reporting and documentation of abuses during the crackdown and immediately after the election. It pointed out that the Zimbabwe High Court declared that the use of the Interception of Communications Act to suspend online communications was illegal, noting that the interruption of telecommunications has become a tool used by the regime to block the coordination of demonstrations organised on social networks, and to prevent access to information in order to mask the massive human rights violations which the state was preparing to commit. Lastly, Parliament called on the EU delegation and EU Member State embassies in Zimbabwe to continue their close monitoring of developments in the country and to use all appropriate tools to support human rights defenders, civil society organisations and trade unions, to promote the essential elements of the Cotonou Agreement and to support pro-democracy movements.
  • date: 2019-02-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2019/2563(RSP)
title
Resolution on Zimbabwe
subject
geographical_area
Zimbabwe
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subtype
Urgent debate or resolution
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 144
stage_reached
Procedure completed