BETA


2019/2564(RSP) Resolution on women's rights defenders in Saudi Arabia

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 144

Events

2019/02/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2019/02/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2019/02/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 517 votes to 10 with 70 abstentions a resolution on women’s rights defenders in Saudi Arabia.

The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE/NGL, Greens/EFA and EFDD groups.

Women’s rights defenders

Parliament strongly condemned the detention of the women human rights defenders who campaigned for the lifting of the driving ban, as well as of all peaceful human rights defenders, journalists, lawyers and activists, and expresses its shock at the credible reports of systematic torture against several of them, including Loujain al-Hathloul who has been nominated for the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize, and eight other named women. It called on the Saudi authorities to immediately and unconditionally release these women’s rights defenders and to facilitate their access to independent medical doctors. Members noted that reports maintain that Saudi interrogators have tortured, maltreated and sexually abused at least three of the women activists detained in May 2018. They also noted that since Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud came to power in June 2017, many outspoken human rights defenders have been arbitrarily detained, or unjustly sentenced to lengthy prison terms simply for exercising their right to freedom of expression. They condemned the harassment, repression and torture of human rights defenders, including women’s rights defenders, in Saudi Arabia, which undermines the credibility of the reform process in the country.

Parliament regretted the inefficient statements by the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Member States on the cases of the women human rights defenders detained since May 2018. It called on the VP/HR, the EEAS and the Member States to:

- bring up the cases of Loujain al-Hathloul, and all other women human rights defenders in their dialogues with the Saudi authorities, and to demand their release. In the meantime, EU diplomats should call on the Saudi authorities to guarantee their safety and to pursue full investigations into the reports of torture. ;

- establish a unified position to ensure that the European diplomatic services in Saudi Arabia systematically use the mechanisms envisaged in the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders,

Male guardianship system

Parliament urges the Saudi Government to immediately abolish the male guardianship system, whereby authorisation from a male guardian is still expected in a number of areas, including international travel, accessing healthcare services, choosing one’s residency, marriage, filing complaints with the justice system, and leaving state-run shelters for abused women and detention centres. Members pointed to the fact that under the male guardianship system, Saudi women are deprived of even the most basic control over their lives.

Gender-based violence

The resolution urged the Saudi authorities to adopt comprehensive legislation to specifically define and criminalise all forms of gender-based violence against women, in particular female genital mutilation, rape, including marital rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment, and to remove all the obstacles women face in their access to justice. Members were deeply concerned about the prevalence of gender-based violence in Saudi Arabia, which remains largely underreported and undocumented, and which has been justified citing retrograde reasons such as the need to discipline women under men’s guardianship.

Government web services

Members expressed concern over the government web services with which male guardians can track women, specify when and how they can cross Saudi borders, and get close to real-time SMS updates when they travel. They also noted the recent adoption of a law under which Saudi women can be notified by text message if they are being divorced, to protect them from having their marriage ended without their knowledge. Parliament emphasised that this law does nothing to address the fact that Saudi women can only obtain divorces in exceedingly limited cases, such as with their husband’s consent or if their husband has harmed them.

Council common position

Members reiterated their call for the Council to reach a common position in order to impose a EU-wide arms embargo on Saudi Arabia. They called for:

- an embargo on the export of surveillance systems and other dual-use items that may be used in Saudi Arabia for the purposes of the repression of its citizens, including women human rights defenders;

- the adoption of the use of restricted measures against Saudi Arabia in response to breaches of human rights, including asset freezes and visa bans.

Members reminded Member States that their continued arms deals with Saudi Arabia are in contravention of the EU’s common position on arms exports. They called on the VP/HR to report on the current state of military and security cooperation between the Member States and the Saudi regime.

Death penalty

Noting that Saudi Arabia has one of the highest execution rates in the world, Members called on the Saudi authorities to introduce an immediate moratorium on the use of the death penalty as a step towards its abolition. The average number of executions per year was at least 126 between 2014 and 2017.

Lastly, Members called for the Commission and Parliament to look into the lack of listings of Saudi Arabia within the EU transparency register.

Documents
2019/02/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2019/02/13
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

RC-B8-0111/2019 - § 27/2 14/02/2019 12:05:38.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: +: 338, -: 239, 0: 19
IT ES AT BE EL SE NL FI DE DK PT IE LT EE CY LU CZ HR LV HU BG SI RO MT GB SK FR PL
Total
54
42
18
16
15
10
25
12
79
11
18
7
8
4
2
5
18
10
7
13
14
8
23
5
52
12
62
45
icon: S&D S&D
142

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

5

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

2

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3
icon: PPE PPE
169

Belgium PPE

For (1)

1

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Sweden PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

United Kingdom PPE

2

RC-B8-0111/2019 - § 28/1 14/02/2019 12:05:53.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: +: 456, -: 99, 0: 38
DE IT ES RO AT PT BE EL HU SK BG CZ SE NL FI SI FR IE HR PL LU DK LT EE MT LV CY GB
Total
77
54
41
22
18
17
16
16
13
12
14
18
10
25
12
8
62
7
10
45
5
11
8
4
5
7
2
53
icon: PPE PPE
169

Belgium PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland PPE

3

Croatia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Latvia PPE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
138

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
59

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

RC-B8-0111/2019 - § 28/2 14/02/2019 12:06:03.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: +: 329, -: 227, 0: 31
IT BE AT PT DE NL FI SE IE EL ES MT CZ DK EE CY LT LU RO HU LV SI HR SK BG FR GB PL
Total
54
16
16
18
79
25
10
11
7
15
41
5
18
10
4
2
7
5
22
13
6
6
9
12
14
62
54
45
icon: S&D S&D
140

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
17

Italy NI

For (1)

1

Germany NI

2

Denmark NI

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
164

Belgium PPE

For (1)

1

Austria PPE

Against (1)

4

Finland PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

2

Latvia PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

For (1)

4

United Kingdom PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

RC-B8-0111/2019 - § 28/3 14/02/2019 12:06:13.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: +: 480, -: 86, 0: 30
DE IT ES FR RO AT PT BE EL HU BG CZ SE DK SK NL FI HR SI LT IE PL LU LV EE MT GB CY
Total
80
54
42
61
23
18
17
16
15
13
14
17
11
11
12
25
12
10
7
8
7
45
5
7
4
5
54
2
icon: PPE PPE
169

Belgium PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Croatia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
142

Hungary S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
39

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

5

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
59

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

RC-B8-0111/2019 - Résolution 14/02/2019 12:06:23.000 #

2019/02/14 Outcome: +: 517, 0: 70, -: 10
DE IT FR ES GB RO PL PT NL CZ BE AT BG HU SE FI DK SK HR EL SI LT LV IE LU MT EE CY
Total
80
54
60
41
55
24
42
18
25
18
16
18
14
13
12
11
11
12
10
16
8
8
7
7
5
5
4
2
icon: PPE PPE
169

United Kingdom PPE

2

Belgium PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Croatia PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
143

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
57

Germany ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
3

Denmark ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

4

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
59

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

1
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
40

Italy GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

2

Italy NI

For (1)

1

France NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Denmark NI

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

3

Poland ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0111_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0111_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0113_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0113_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0115_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0115_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0116_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0116_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0121_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0121_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0123_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0123_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0126_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0126_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0111_EN.html
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0111_EN.html
events/0
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/0
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=32263&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/1
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Debate in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/1
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0117_EN.html title: T8-0117/2019
summary
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2019-02-14-TOC_EN.html
events/2
date
2019-02-14T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0117_EN.html title: T8-0117/2019
summary
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0111&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0111_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0113&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0113_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0115&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0115_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0116&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0116_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0121&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0121_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0123&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0123_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0126&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-8-2019-0126_EN.html
docs/7/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2019-0111&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-8-2019-0111_EN.html
events/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0117
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2019-0117_EN.html
docs
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0111&language=EN title: B8-0111/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0113&language=EN title: B8-0113/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0115&language=EN title: B8-0115/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0116&language=EN title: B8-0116/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0121&language=EN title: B8-0121/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0123&language=EN title: B8-0123/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B8-2019-0126&language=EN title: B8-0126/2019 type: Motion for a resolution body: EP
  • date: 2019-02-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=P8-RC-2019-0111&language=EN title: RC-B8-0111/2019 type: Joint motion for resolution
events
  • date: 2019-02-14T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20190214&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2019-02-14T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2019-0117 title: T8-0117/2019 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 517 votes to 10 with 70 abstentions a resolution on women’s rights defenders in Saudi Arabia. The resolution was tabled by the EPP, S&D, ECR, ALDE, GUE/NGL, Greens/EFA and EFDD groups. Women’s rights defenders Parliament strongly condemned the detention of the women human rights defenders who campaigned for the lifting of the driving ban, as well as of all peaceful human rights defenders, journalists, lawyers and activists, and expresses its shock at the credible reports of systematic torture against several of them, including Loujain al-Hathloul who has been nominated for the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize, and eight other named women. It called on the Saudi authorities to immediately and unconditionally release these women’s rights defenders and to facilitate their access to independent medical doctors. Members noted that reports maintain that Saudi interrogators have tortured, maltreated and sexually abused at least three of the women activists detained in May 2018. They also noted that since Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud came to power in June 2017, many outspoken human rights defenders have been arbitrarily detained, or unjustly sentenced to lengthy prison terms simply for exercising their right to freedom of expression. They condemned the harassment, repression and torture of human rights defenders, including women’s rights defenders, in Saudi Arabia, which undermines the credibility of the reform process in the country. Parliament regretted the inefficient statements by the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Member States on the cases of the women human rights defenders detained since May 2018. It called on the VP/HR, the EEAS and the Member States to: - bring up the cases of Loujain al-Hathloul, and all other women human rights defenders in their dialogues with the Saudi authorities, and to demand their release. In the meantime, EU diplomats should call on the Saudi authorities to guarantee their safety and to pursue full investigations into the reports of torture. ; - establish a unified position to ensure that the European diplomatic services in Saudi Arabia systematically use the mechanisms envisaged in the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders, Male guardianship system Parliament urges the Saudi Government to immediately abolish the male guardianship system, whereby authorisation from a male guardian is still expected in a number of areas, including international travel, accessing healthcare services, choosing one’s residency, marriage, filing complaints with the justice system, and leaving state-run shelters for abused women and detention centres. Members pointed to the fact that under the male guardianship system, Saudi women are deprived of even the most basic control over their lives. Gender-based violence The resolution urged the Saudi authorities to adopt comprehensive legislation to specifically define and criminalise all forms of gender-based violence against women, in particular female genital mutilation, rape, including marital rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment, and to remove all the obstacles women face in their access to justice. Members were deeply concerned about the prevalence of gender-based violence in Saudi Arabia, which remains largely underreported and undocumented, and which has been justified citing retrograde reasons such as the need to discipline women under men’s guardianship. Government web services Members expressed concern over the government web services with which male guardians can track women, specify when and how they can cross Saudi borders, and get close to real-time SMS updates when they travel. They also noted the recent adoption of a law under which Saudi women can be notified by text message if they are being divorced, to protect them from having their marriage ended without their knowledge. Parliament emphasised that this law does nothing to address the fact that Saudi women can only obtain divorces in exceedingly limited cases, such as with their husband’s consent or if their husband has harmed them. Council common position Members reiterated their call for the Council to reach a common position in order to impose a EU-wide arms embargo on Saudi Arabia. They called for: - an embargo on the export of surveillance systems and other dual-use items that may be used in Saudi Arabia for the purposes of the repression of its citizens, including women human rights defenders; - the adoption of the use of restricted measures against Saudi Arabia in response to breaches of human rights, including asset freezes and visa bans. Members reminded Member States that their continued arms deals with Saudi Arabia are in contravention of the EU’s common position on arms exports. They called on the VP/HR to report on the current state of military and security cooperation between the Member States and the Saudi regime. Death penalty Noting that Saudi Arabia has one of the highest execution rates in the world, Members called on the Saudi authorities to introduce an immediate moratorium on the use of the death penalty as a step towards its abolition. The average number of executions per year was at least 126 between 2014 and 2017. Lastly, Members called for the Commission and Parliament to look into the lack of listings of Saudi Arabia within the EU transparency register.
  • date: 2019-02-14T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
procedure
reference
2019/2564(RSP)
title
Resolution on women's rights defenders in Saudi Arabia
subject
geographical_area
Saudi Arabia
type
RSP - Resolutions on topical subjects
subtype
Urgent debate or resolution
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure EP 144
stage_reached
Procedure completed