Progress: Procedure completed
Legal Basis:
RoP 132-p2Events
The European Parliament adopted by 478 votes to 155, with 29 abstentions, a resolution on the rule of law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling.
The Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation is intended to protect the Union budget and the EU’s financial interests from effects resulting from breaches of the principles of the rule of law. The resolution recalled that the war unfolding in Ukraine has reminded the EU of its shared duty to effectively protect democracy and the rule of law.
Parliament is of the opinion that the Commission should use all of the tools at its disposal, including the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, to address the persistent violations of democracy and fundamental rights everywhere in the Union, including attacks against media freedom and journalists, migrants, women’s rights, LGBTIQ people’s rights, and freedom of association and assembly. It called on the Commission to act and to take this into account in the application of the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation which entered into force on 1 January 2021 and has been binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States since that date. So far, the Commission has not applied it.
On 11 March 2021, Poland and Hungary challenged the regulation in the EU Court of Justice and on the 16 February 2022, the EU Court of Justice issued a ruling that actions by Hungary and Poland against the rules on conditionality, which protect the European Union’s budget, should be dismissed.
Parliament welcomed the European Court of Justice’s recent judgement dismissing the actions by Hungary and Poland against the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation, as well as the Court’s conclusions that the regulation is in line with EU law and its powers as regards rule of law.
The Commission is called on to fulfil its duties as the guardian of the Treaties and to instantly react to the ongoing severe violations of the principles of the rule of law in some Member States, which represent a serious danger to the Union’s financial interests in relation to the fair, legal and impartial distribution of EU funds, particularly those under shared management. The resolution stressed that the Rule of Law Conditionality Mechanism should be applied to both the Union budget and to NextGenerationEU.
Parliament also regretted the Commission’s inadequate response to the ECJ rulings of 16 February 2022 and underlined that the Commission has a duty to implement EU legislation regardless of electoral timetables in the Member States.
The resolution stressed that inaction and a lax approach towards oligarchic structures and the systemic violation of the rule of law weaken the entire European Union and undermine the trust of its citizens. Parliament underlined the need to ensure that taxpayers’ money never ends up in the pockets of those who undermine the EU’s shared values.
Furthermore, Members stressed that the deteriorating situation as regards the rule of law in some Member States necessitates a constructive dialogue about the further evolution of the EU’s rule of law toolbox.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)398
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0074/2022
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0134/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0135/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0136/2022
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0134/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0135/2022
- Motion for a resolution: B9-0136/2022
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2022)398
Activities
- Andrea BOCSKOR
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ryszard CZARNECKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Andor DELI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Eleonora EVI
Institutional Motions (1)
- José Manuel FERNANDES
Institutional Motions (1)
- Raffaele FITTO
Institutional Motions (1)
- Anna FOTYGA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Eider GARDIAZABAL RUBIAL
Institutional Motions (1)
- Balázs HIDVÉGHI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Lívia JÁRÓKA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Karol KARSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ádám KÓSA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Zdzisław KRASNODĘBSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Zbigniew KUŹMIUK
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ryszard Antoni LEGUTKO
Institutional Motions (1)
- Tomasz Piotr PORĘBA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Jacek SARYUSZ-WOLSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Petri SARVAMAA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Gunnar BECK
Institutional Motions (1)
- Lars Patrick BERG
Institutional Motions (1)
- Katalin CSEH
Institutional Motions (1)
- Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD
Institutional Motions (1)
- Nicolaus FEST
Institutional Motions (1)
- Beata KEMPA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Witold Jan WASZCZYKOWSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO
Institutional Motions (1)
- Joanna KOPCIŃSKA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Edina TÓTH
Institutional Motions (1)
- Bettina VOLLATH
Institutional Motions (1)
- Franco ROBERTI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Beata MAZUREK
Institutional Motions (1)
- Andżelika Anna MOŻDŻANOWSKA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Elżbieta RAFALSKA
Institutional Motions (1)
- Grzegorz TOBISZOWSKI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Sylwia SPUREK
Institutional Motions (1)
- Krzysztof JURGIEL
Institutional Motions (1)
- Izabela-Helena KLOC
Institutional Motions (1)
- László TRÓCSÁNYI
Institutional Motions (1)
- Elżbieta KRUK
Institutional Motions (1)
- Vincenzo SOFO
Institutional Motions (1)
- Ladislav ILČIĆ
Institutional Motions (1)
Votes
L'état de droit et les conséquences de l'arrêt de la CJUE - Rule of law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling - Rechtsstaatlichkeit und die Konsequenzen des Urteils des EuGH - B9-0134/2022 - § 1 - Am 4 #
B9-0134/2022 - Après le § 1 - Am 5 #
B9-0134/2022 - § 2 #
B9-0134/2022 - Après le § 2 - Am 6 #
B9-0134/2022 - § 11 - Am 1 #
B9-0134/2022 - Après le § 11 - Am 7 #
B9-0134/2022 - Après le considérant D - Am 2 #
B9-0134/2022 - Après le considérant N - Am 3 #
B9-0134/2022 - Considérant O #
L'état de droit et les conséquences de l'arrêt de la CJUE - Rule of law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling - Rechtsstaatlichkeit und die Konsequenzen des Urteils des EuGH - B9-0134/2022 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) #
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/2 |
|
events/2/summary |
|
docs/3 |
|
events/1 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting plenary debate/voteNew
Procedure completed |
forecasts |
|
procedure/title |
Old
The Rule of Law and the consequences of the ECJ rulingNew
Resolution on the rule of law and the consequences of the ECJ ruling |
forecasts |
|
docs |
|
commission |
|
events |
|
forecasts |
|