BETA


2022/2656(RSP) Resolution on the case of Osman Kavala in Turkey

Progress: Procedure completed

Legal Basis:
RoP 144

Events

2022/05/05
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2022/05/05
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament resolution on the case of Osman Kavala in Turkey.

The text adopted in plenary was tabled by the EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens/EFA, The Left groups and Members.

On 25 April 2022, Istanbul’s 13th High Criminal Court, presided by Judge Mesut Özdemir, sentenced Osman Kavala, a philanthropist and prominent human rights defender, to life in prison without parole, finding him guilty of attempting to overthrow the government, but acquitting him of espionage.

Following a binding judgement in 2019 from the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning Mr Kavala’s case, it was demanded of the Turkish to secure Mr Kavala’s immediate release. However, there has not been any progress towards his release, increasing the EU’s concerns about the Turkish judiciary’s adherence to international and EU standards. Parliament is concerned about incidents suggesting clear government interference in the judicial affairs related to the prosecution of Mr Kavala.

Parliament condemned, in the strongest possible terms, the ruling imposing an aggravated life sentence on Osman Kavala after more than four and a half years of unjust, unlawful and illegitimate detention. It believes that he has been convicted on unjustified charges, for the ulterior purpose of silencing him as a human rights defender and deterring critical voices in Turkey.

Members called for all charges against him to be dropped immediately and for his rights and freedoms to be guaranteed in full. Parliament also called for the immediate release of the other seven defendants in the case.

Parliament is deeply concerned about the ongoing deterioration of fundamental rights and freedoms and the rule of law in Turkey. It called on Turkey to end the judicial harassment of human rights defenders, academics, journalists, spiritual leaders and lawyers.

The resolution called for a delegation of the European Parliament to attend the trial of Mr Kavala and his co-defendants, if it goes ahead. It also noted the possibility to lodge an appeal against the last court ruling at the Turkish Court of Cassation and the Constitutional Court. Members stressed that Mr Kavala and other Turkish citizens in similar situations can be granted political asylum inside the EU if necessary.

Furthermore, the Commission and the Member States are called on to increase the use of emergency grants for human rights defenders and to ensure the full implementation of the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders.

Lastly, Parliament noted that with the decision to openly defy the binding rulings of the ECtHR on the case of Osman Kavala and others, the current Turkish Government has deliberately destroyed any hopes of reopening its EU accession process or opening new chapters and closing open ones under the current circumstances.

Documents
2022/05/04
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   EP - Motion for a resolution
Documents
2022/05/03
   Joint motion for resolution
Documents

Documents

Activities

Votes

Le cas d'Osman Kavala en Turquie - The case of Osman Kavala in Turkey - Der Fall von Osman Kavala in der Türkei - B9-0227/2022 - Après le § 15 - Am 1 #

2022/05/05 Outcome: -: 483, +: 79, 0: 27
LV EE HU MT LU AT SI CY SK LT EL FI IE CZ HR BE DK BG NL SE IT RO FR PT PL ES DE
Total
6
6
6
5
5
17
6
6
11
10
13
13
11
18
12
18
13
11
24
20
66
22
66
21
45
56
82
icon: ID ID
56

Estonia ID

For (1)

1
3

Finland ID

2

Czechia ID

2

Denmark ID

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
25

Latvia NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

1

Slovakia NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania NI

Abstain (1)

1

Greece NI

1

Croatia NI

2

France NI

2
3
icon: ECR ECR
54

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

4

Germany ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: The Left The Left
33

Cyprus The Left

2

Finland The Left

Against (1)

1

Ireland The Left

4

Czechia The Left

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium The Left

Against (1)

1

Denmark The Left

Against (1)

1

Netherlands The Left

Against (1)

1

Sweden The Left

Against (1)

1

France The Left

3

Germany The Left

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
64

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

3

Ireland Verts/ALE

2

Czechia Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Poland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3
icon: Renew Renew
94

Latvia Renew

Against (1)

1

Estonia Renew

Against (2)

2

Hungary Renew

2

Luxembourg Renew

Against (1)

1

Austria Renew

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Renew

2

Lithuania Renew

Against (1)

1

Greece Renew

Against (1)

1

Finland Renew

3

Ireland Renew

2
5

Croatia Renew

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria Renew

3

Sweden Renew

3

Italy Renew

3

Poland Renew

1
icon: S&D S&D
118

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Greece S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

1

Belgium S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
145

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Malta PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Slovenia PPE

4

Cyprus PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/1/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0232_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0233_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0237_EN.html
docs/4/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0238_EN.html
docs/5/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0239_EN.html
docs/6/docs/0/url
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/B-9-2022-0246_EN.html
docs/7
date
2022-05-03T00:00:00
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/RC-9-2022-0227_EN.html title: RC-B9-0227/2022
type
Joint motion for resolution
docs/7
date
2022-05-05T00:00:00
docs
title: T9-0199/2022
type
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
body
EP
events/0/docs
  • url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-9-2022-05-04-TOC_EN.html title: Debate in Parliament
events/1
date
2022-05-05T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=58638&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/1
date
2022-05-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
title: T9-0199/2022
events/2
date
2022-05-05T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0199_EN.html title: T9-0199/2022
summary