The European Parliament adopted by 560 votes to 43, with 27 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the draft Council decision on the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty.

Parliament gave its consent to the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty.

As a reminder, the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) is a multilateral trade and investment agreement applicable to the energy sector that was signed in 1994 and entered into force in 1998. The European Union is a Contracting Party to the ECT, together with Euratom, 23 EU Member States, as well as Japan, Switzerland, Turkey and most countries from the Western Balkans and the former USSR, with the exception of Russia and Belarus which signed the agreement in 1994 but never ratified it.

Eleven Member States (Germany, France, Spain, Netherlands, Italy, Poland, Slovenia, Luxembourg, Denmark, Ireland, Portugal) and the UK, representing more than 70% of the European population, have already decided to exit the ECT. The withdrawal of the EU is the next logical step .

The proposed EU withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty is a result of years of mobilisation by numerous associations to exit a treaty that protects the financial interests of multinational fossil fuel corporations at the expense of regulatory autonomy and an effective social climate transition. In 2021, over 1 million European citizens called on EU countries “to pull out from the ECT”. Climate activists, trade unions, scientists, academics, and a broad number of social movements joined voices to expose the dangers of this treaty and repeatedly called on countries to exit. In addition, the European Parliament called for the withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty in its resolution of 24 November 2022 on the outcome of the modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty.

In the absence of any substantial update of the ECT since the 1990s, a modernisation process was initiated in 2018. However, the proposed text of the modernised ECT fails to align with the Paris Agreement, the EU Climate Law, or the objectives of the European Green Deal.

Therefore, Parliament considers that remaining a Contracting Party to the ECT is not an option and subsequently welcomes the Commission’s proposal on the withdrawal of the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty.

PURPOSE: to withdraw the Union from the Energy Charter Treaty.

PROPOSED ACT: Council Decision.

ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: Council may adopt the act only if Parliament has given its consent to the act.

BACKGROUND: the Energy Charter Treaty was concluded by the Union by Council and Commission Decision 98/181/EC, ECSC, Euratom and entered into force on 16 April 1998. The European Union is a Contracting Party to the ECT, together with Euratom, 26 EU Member States (as of 8 May 2023), as well as Japan, Switzerland, Turkey and most countries from the Western Balkans and the former USSR, with the exception of Russia and Belarus.

In the absence of any substantial update of the Agreement since the 1990s, the Agreement became increasingly outdated. In 2019, the Contracting Parties to the Agreement engaged in negotiations aimed at modernising the Agreement in order to bring it into alignment with the principles of the Paris Agreement, the requirements of sustainable development and the fight against climate change, as well as with modern standards of investment protection.

The Contracting Parties concluded the negotiations on 24 June 2022. The negotiated outcome was meant to the adopted at the 33rd meeting of the Energy Charter Conference on 22 November 2022. Ahead of the meeting of the Conference, the Union was unable to find a common position on the modernisation of the Agreement.

In the absence of a Union position, the adoption of the modernised Agreement by the Energy Charter Conference is impossible. The current, unmodernised Agreement continues to apply to the Union, in spite of the fact that it is not in line with the Union’s investment policy and law, including in particular the principle of autonomy of Union law, and with the Union’s energy and climate goals.

With no alternative available, it is therefore necessary for the Union to withdraw from the Agreement.

CONTENT: the Commission’s proposal concerns a Council decision on the withdrawal from the Union of the Energy Charter Treaty in accordance with Article 47.1 of that Treaty.

According to the Commission, remaining a Contracting Party to the current, unmodernised ECT is not an option for the EU or its Member States, as the current, unmodernised Treaty is not in line with the EU’s investment policy and law and with the EU’s energy and climate goals.

The provisions of the Treaty as regards investment protection, including the investor-to-State dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism, are not in line with the EU approach to investment protection. In particular, the unmodernised ECT is incompatible with the principle of autonomy of Union law.

In addition, the protection granted to fossil fuels does not fit with EU objectives as defined in the European Green Deal, the REPowerEU Plan or the Climate Law – namely: to accelerate the shift away from fossil fuels and towards renewable energy, to achieve a greater energy independence, ensure the EU’s energy security, and, not least, deliver on the commitment to cut emissions by at least 55% by 2030 and to reach climate neutrality by 2050.