9 Amendments of Paolo BORCHIA related to 2020/2216(INI)
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the COVID crisis, together with the EU's special financial response, provides an opportunity to speed up digitalisation; calls for traditional and innovative financial incentives for SMEs that want to enter new markets;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for special economic digital zones to promote structural change and create development cores for new digital economic structures, while maintaining incentives that are equally valid for all EU territories;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to stop funding big companies and to distributinge the remaining funds by a shotgun approach; calls for winners to be pickedin accordance with a methodically studied priority system; calls for winners to be picked according to their expected value, calculated through the standard methods for valuing start-ups, and grown larger; suggests prioritising future areas for digital economic structures;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Demands an end to the exodus of more careful assessment of the start-ups tha market dto not receive follow-up- funding in Europe but find it elsewhereprevent the best newcomers from developing outside European borders;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls for massive investment in clusters of excellencean assessment of the best clusters in which to invest as a matter of priority;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Demands measures to put an end to the brain drain andin order to make the most of the human capital of EU citizens who can afford to be intellectually independent, completing the picture by attracting further experience from people from non-EU countries, and to attract the best minds to the EU;
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises that AI deployment is key to European competitiveness in the digital era; highlights that to facilitate the uptake of AI in Europe, a common European approach is needed to avoid internal market fragmentation, whilst at the same time exploiting the specific features of the centres of excellence in various Member States;
Amendment 128 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Warns against overregulating AI; recalls that regulation must be balanced, agile, permanently evaluated, and based on soft regulation except for high-riskIs of the view that in such a disruptive sector which could potentially have a great impact on people, it is important to establish a well-defined, balanced regulatory framework in which operators can work under hard and fast rules which affect people's lives in a reasponsible manner;
Amendment 149 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for the assessment of the real need for a European Disruptive Innovation Agency which concentrates on first stage research. to be postponed until this technology has reached a more advanced stage of maturity, and for all the funds to be used to boost support for SMEs;