Activities of Dolores GARCÍA-HIERRO CARABALLO
Plenary speeches (15)
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (A7-0282/2013 - Alain Cadec)
European fishing sector and the EU-Thailand free trade agreement (A7-0130/2014 - Gabriel Mato Adrover)
Specific actions in the Common Fisheries Policy for developing the role of women (short presentation)
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies (A7-0047/2014 - Anne Delvaux, Konrad Szymański)
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (A7-0282/2013 - Alain Cadec) (vote)
European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (debate)
Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (debate)
Institutional deadlock regarding multi-annual fisheries management plans (debate)
Common fisheries policy (debate)
Baltic salmon stock and the fisheries exploiting that stock - Conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms - Removal of fins of sharks on board vessels - Small-scale and artisanal fisheries and CFP reform - External dimension of the common fisheries policy (debate)
Measures in relation to countries allowing non-sustainable fishing for the purpose of the conservation of fish stocks - Common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products - Conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources - Reform of the common fisheries policy (debate)
Threat posed by chartering to flag state responsibilities under the CITES Convention (debate)
Bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean (debate)
European Fisheries Fund (debate)
Multi-annual plan for western stock of Atlantic horse mackerel - TAC and quotas regulation for 2012 - Contribution of the common fisheries policy to the production of public goods (debate)
Reports (2)
REPORT on specific actions in the Common Fisheries Policy for developing the role of women PDF (209 KB) DOC (99 KB)
RECOMMENDATION on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Mozambique PDF (188 KB) DOC (126 KB)
Shadow reports (2)
REPORT on the proposal for a Council regulation opening and providing for the administration of autonomous tariff quotas of the Union on imports of certain fishery products into the Canary Islands from 2014 to 2020 PDF (148 KB) DOC (67 KB)
REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products PDF (454 KB) DOC (848 KB)
Shadow opinions (2)
OPINION on Blue Growth - Enhancing sustainable growth in the EU’s marine, maritime transport and tourism sectors
OPINION on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon 2020 - The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020)
Amendments (454)
Amendment 1 #
2013/2145(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the budget appropriations for 2014 to be sufficient to meet the challenges of the recently reformed Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), and above all for account to be taken of coastal and artisanal fishing as a source of job creation;
Amendment 5 #
2013/2145(BUD)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Stresses the need to foster vocational training and access to jobs for young people in the fisheries and aquaculture sector, providing particular support for coastal areas worst hit by unemployment as a consequence of the crisis or of CFP reform; also highlights the role of women in fisheries and calls for gender equality policies to be promoted as part of the common fisheries policy;
Amendment 11 #
2012/2297(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that aquaculture should contribute to food production on a sustainable basis throughout the Union so as to contribute to guaranteeing long-term food security and consumer protection; considers that the sustainable development and innovation of the sustainable aquaculture industry should be encouraged, improving the quality of life in coastal and rural areas;
Amendment 19 #
2012/2297(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that a successful blue economy requires secure EU maritime borders, with a view to ensuring the protection of the marine environment, fisheries controls, the combating of illegal fishing and law enforcement;
Amendment 28 #
2012/2297(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the importance of the future European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) in supporting the sustainable development of fisheries and aquaculture and for economic diversification in fishing communities, particularly in respect of small-scale coastal fisheries, vocational training for women and young people and attracting new entrepreneurs to the sector;
Amendment 34 #
2012/2297(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the importance of coastal regions and of sustainable coastal and maritime tourism for the development of an all-inclusive maritime, social and green economy.
Amendment 38 #
2012/2297(INI)
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Points out that due account must be paid of the particular geography of the outermost regions;
Amendment 96 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) Furthermore the Union should act as a leader in the establishment and implementation of good-governance measures for the sustainable management of deep-sea fisheries within international fora in line with the UNGA and FAO resolutions adopted in this Regulation.
Amendment 118 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) Bottom-set gillnets are currently restricted in entering deep-sea fisheries by Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011. In view of the high rates of undesired catch when they were deployed unsustainably in deep waters, and in view of the ecological impact of lost and abandoned gear, this gear should also be permanently prohibited from the targeting of deep-sea speciesonly be used if guarantees can be provided as to the sustainability of fishing, in accordance with the provisions of this Regulation.
Amendment 126 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
Recital 10
(10) Moreover, vessels which have to change gear in order to be able to stay in the fishery in a sustainable manner should be eligible for receiving financial assistance from the European Fisheries Fund provided that the new gear reduces the impact of fishing on non- commercial species and provided also that the national operational programme allows contributing to such measures.
Amendment 132 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) It is essential to identify and accurately delimit vulnerable marine ecosystems which should be subject to a specific protection status and, possibly, a ban on the use of fishing gears with the greatest impact on seabeds. This task implies a need for detailed information about the physiographical characteristics of seabeds and their biological communities, to be obtained by means including research surveys for the purposes of high-resolution seabed mapping and of sampling, identification, and characterisation of the benthic communities concerned.
Amendment 133 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
Recital 11 a (new)
(11a) The concept of technodiversity needs to be defined. Account must be taken of the fact that each type of gear has its own specific characteristics in terms its of capacity to capture a given species and its impact on the seabed. It should therefore be recognised that certain types of gear are better than others at catching a given species, depending on where the species is caught and whether it is endangered.
Amendment 135 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
Recital 12
(12) Scientific advice concerning certain fish stocks found in the deep-sea indicates that these stocks are particularly vulnerable to exploitation, and that fishing for these stocks should be limited or reduced as a precautionary measure. Fishing opportunities for deep-sea stocks should not go beyond those levels which are scientifically advised as precautionary. In the case of advice being absent for lack of sufficient information about stocks or species, no fishing opportunities shouldmay only be allocated in accordance with the precautionary principle, based on the best available information.
Amendment 137 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12 a (new)
Recital 12 a (new)
(12a) Given the mixed nature of most deep-sea fisheries, fishing opportunities for deep-sea fishing should be established in a way that ensures the long-term conservation of the most vulnerable species caught in the fisheries involved.
Amendment 149 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to prevent significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems and ensure the long-term conservation of deep-sea fish stocks;
Amendment 169 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
(ea) ‘vulnerable marine ecosystem’ means any marine ecosystem whose integrity (i.e. ecosystem structure or function) is, according to the best scientific information available and to the principle of precaution, threatened by significant adverse impacts resulting from physical contact with bottom gears in the normal course of fishing operations, including inter alia reefs, seamounts, hydrothermal vents, cold water corals or cold water sponge beds. The most vulnerable ecosystems are those that are easily disturbed and in addition are very slow to recover, or may never recover.
Amendment 187 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the vessel's master records in the logbook a percentage of deep-sea species equal or superior to 10% of the overall catch weight in the fishing day concerned5%. NB: this percentage should count as part of the annual amount and not as part of a given haul or fishing trip.
Amendment 220 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In addition to the requirements set out in Article 6, each application for a fishing authorisation for targeted deep sea fisheries, as referred to in Article 4(1), that allows the use of bottom gears in Union waters as referred to in Article 2(a), shall be accompanied by a detailed fishing plan specifying, in addition to the fishing gears and technical measures to be used:
Amendment 239 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Any fishing authorisation issued on the basis of an application made in accordance with paragraph 1 shall specify the characteristics, type and dimensions of the bottom gear to be used and limit the fishing activities authorised to the area in which the intended fishing activity, as set out in paragraph 1(a), and the existing fishing activity, as set out in paragraph 1(b), overlap. However, the area of the intended fishing activity can be extended beyond the area of the existing fishing activity if the Member State has assessed and documented, based on best available scientific advice, that such extension would not have significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems. This assessment shall be conducted in accordance with Annex IIa and the 2008 FAO International Guidelines for the Management of Deep-Sea Fisheries in the High Seas and shall be made publicly available. The Commission, in consultation with the Member State and the scientific advisory body, shall review this assessment to ensure that all areas where VMEs are known or likely to occur have been identified and that the proposed mitigation and management measures are sufficient to prevent significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems.
Amendment 254 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
Amendment 256 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9
Article 9
Fishing authorisations referred to in Article 4(1) for vessels using bottom trawls or bottom-set gillnets shall expire at the latest twohree years after the entry into force of this Regulation. After that date, fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species with those gears shall neither be issued nor renewed.
Amendment 260 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new)
If after a three-year period it is determined that, in areas where the fishing pressure exerted by a limited number of vessels over this period has led to stocks returning to maximum sustainable yield levels, bottom-set gillnets do not need to be prohibited.
Amendment 272 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. When allocating the fishing opportunities for deep-sea species available to them Member States shall use transparent and objective criteria that shall include, inter alia: (a) selectivity of fishing methods, gears and practices with low by-catch and low impact on the marine ecosystem, with a particular focus on most vulnerable species and vulnerable marine ecosystems; (b) record of compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy and EU environmental requirements and with respecting catch and/or fishing effort limits designated by scientific advice; (c) quality employment (d) fuel emissions and energy efficiency of the fishing operation; and (e) use of video surveillance or an equivalent electronic monitoring equipment, (f) working conditions that comply with relevant international standards, notably the 2007 ILO Work in Fishing Convention.
Amendment 306 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Member States shall establish a programme of observer coverage to ensure the collection of reliable, timely and accurate data on the catch and bycatch of deep-sea species, encounters with vulnerable marine ecosystems and other relevant information for the effective implementation of the provisions of this regulation. Vessels using bottom trawls or botom-set gillnets with a fishing authorisation to catch deep-sea species, whether as target or by-catch shall carry 100% observer coverage. The rest of the vessels with an authorisation to catch deep-sea species shall carry 10% observer coverage.
Amendment 314 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Chapter 5 a (new)
Chapter 5 a (new)
Seabed mapping (1) Within two years of the entry into force of this Regulation, the Member States shall compile data and draw up a map of the seabed featuring existing deep- sea fishing areas and identifying areas of vulnerable marine ecosystems; this map shall be forwarded to the European Commission within two years of the entry into force of this Regulation. 2) Data will be collected by the captains of seagoing vessels, or any other persons in charge of them, who shall forward the GPS coordinates of any vulnerable marine ecosystems they may come across, together with details of what kind of ecosystem it is, to the competent authorities. 3) Whenever a vessel identifies a vulnerable marine ecosystem, it shall immediately cease fishing in the surrounding area.
Amendment 315 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 1
1. Within sixtwo years from the entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall, on the basis of Member States' reports and scientific advice that it shall request to this effect, evaluate the impact of the measures laid down in this Regulation and determine to what extent the objectives referred to in Article 1(a) and (b) have been achieved.
Amendment 327 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - Section 1 - row 23
Annex I - Section 1 - row 23
Amendment 329 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - Section 1 - row 36
Annex I - Section 1 - row 36
Amendment 330 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - Section 1 - row 37
Annex I - Section 1 - row 37
Amendment 335 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - Section 2 - row 1
Annex I - Section 2 - row 1
Amendment 337 #
2012/0179(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I - section 2 - row 2
Annex I - section 2 - row 2
Amendment 341 #
Amendment 1 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 bis (new)
Citation 7 bis (new)
- having regard to the FAO Report on the State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010,
Amendment 8 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas 85 % of fish stocks globally for which information is available are either fully exploited or overexploited, according to the most recent assessment by the FAO, despite the progress mentioned that is being made on a global scale in reducing ratios of exploitation and the recovery of overexploited stocks and marine ecosystems, through effective management actions;
Amendment 11 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital A bis (new)
Recital A bis (new)
Aa. whereas fisheries are of strategic importance for the social and economic welfare of coastal communities, aside from the considerable contribution they make in terms of development, employment and the public supply of fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans in the interests of preserving dietary balance throughout the European Union;
Amendment 13 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU is one of the few players that has a strong presence in all the world’s oceans through investmentsthe combined efforts of the Member States, the European Union and investment companies to improve, modernise and adapt the fishing fleet, bilateral fisheries agreements and participation in all of the major Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs);
Amendment 21 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas quotas in RFMOs are primarily based on the development of historical catches, for which maintains preferential access for developed countries to global fish stocks; reason they are awarded by taking into account the preferential access to global fish stocks of developed countries that have carried out more international fishing activity;
Amendment 29 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas there is in many cases insufficient data on fish stocks that the EU is fishing, or which are destined for the internal market, in terms of their status and of total removals by local fleets and other third country fleets to further the development of sustainable fishing, trade and consumption;
Amendment 35 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F bis (new)
Recital F bis (new)
Fa. whereas rigorous scientific studies will be required in order to determine in which fisheries fleet overcapacity is occuring or may occur, studies which must be accompanied by an assessment of the socio-economic and employment impact that a reduction of fleet capacity would have in each one of the fisheries;
Amendment 37 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F ter (new)
Recital F ter (new)
Fb. whereas the CFP should serve as a reference tool that enables the EU to demonstrate to the world how fishing can be practised as a responsible activity and how to promote improvement of the international management of fisheries;
Amendment 39 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital F quater (new)
Recital F quater (new)
Fc. whereas the EU must assume a key role in the mobilisation, involvement and international campaign in the community against IUU fishing;
Amendment 41 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s Communication and the many positive proposals it includes for encouraging the sustainability of the EU’s overall fishing and related activities outside EU waters; considers, however, that the scope of the document is not broad enough, beingas it does not take an integrated approach to other fishing and related activities destined for the internal market and is too concentrated on bilateral agreements and multilateral organisations;
Amendment 46 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 bis (new)
Paragraph 1 bis (new)
1a. Considers that the objectives that must serve to guide the external action of the CFP are to defend Community fishing interests in coherence with EU external policy, using FAO, ILO and UN recommendations as reference;
Amendment 47 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 ter (new)
Paragraph 1 ter (new)
1b. Considers it of major importance to coordinate foreign policy and cooperation policy for the purpose of establishing sustainable fishing agreements and provide the necessary synergies to make a more effective contribution to the development of associated third countries;
Amendment 52 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the size of the EU market for fish and the geographical range of activities by EU-flagged and EU-owned vessels impose a high level of responsibility on the Union for ensuring that its fisheries’ footprint is ecologicsocio-economic impact and footprint are socially, economically and environmentally sustainable, providing high quality seafood to consumers in Europe and other countries where European fish, molluscs and crustaceans and other products prepared with these ingredients are marketed, and contributing to the social and economic fabric of coastal fishing communities both inside the EU and elsewhere;
Amendment 57 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that fishing by EU interests inside and outside Union waters should be based upon the same standards in terms of ecological and socinomic, social and environmental sustainability and transparency;
Amendment 63 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Reiterates its belief in the need for coherence between the fisheries policy of the Union and its policies with respect tothat in order to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy, coherence is needed between the fisheries policy and other policies of the Union, particularly with regard to policies on employment, trade, development and the environment; n. Notes that such coherence requires coordination both within the Commission itself and between the Commission and the governments of the individual Member States;
Amendment 77 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to support clearly defined principles and objectives for environmentally and sociresponsible fishing that is economically, socially and environmentally sustainable fisheries on the high seas and in waters under national jurisdiction at the upcoming United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20) in Brazil in June 2012. The Conference must reflect on and discuss alternatives accompanied by rigorous scientific studies in order to determine in which fisheries fleet overcapacity occurs or may occur, studies that must be accompanied by an assessment of any socio-economic impact which may result from reducing fleet capacity in each fishery;
Amendment 86 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that the EU should launch an initiative at UN level to set up a global catch and traceability documentation scheme as a key tool to combat IUU fishing and ensure fair trade and responsible consumption;
Amendment 95 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 bis (new)
Paragraph 10 bis (new)
10a. States the need to create mechanisms for promoting fishery products that are sustainably sourced from an ecological perspective, and fair from a social perspective, within the EU and beyond;
Amendment 100 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the application of the principles that serve to guide the external action of the Union in bilateral fisheriesing agreements, or Sthe sustainable Ffisheries Aagreements (SFA) as the Commission proposes to call them, negotiated between partners and equitably implemented, should be of benefit to both parties, providingare essential in order to strengthen the external position of the EU and the development of sustainable fishing, should be of benefit to both parties by facilitating the third country with economic resources, technical and scientific expertise, ands well as support for improved fisheries management and good governance to the third country, while allowenabling the continuation of fishing activities by EU vessels that provide a modest but importantlasting supply of fish to the EU and other markets to continue to develop fishing activities in a competitive way;
Amendment 108 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Regrets, however, that EU bilateral agreements have not always fulfilled these potential benefits, while recognising that much improvement has been made since the previous reform; the assessment of populations, the transparency and monitoring of compliance with its objectives, in particular, of the resulting benefits for the local population, and improving governance are key for obtaining them;
Amendment 120 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes positively the intention of the Commission to include several provisions in future bilateral agreements, including respect for the principle of limiting access to resources that are scientifically demonstrated to be surplus tofor the coastal State’s own catch capacity or at regional level in the case of emigrant populations, a human rights clause and the exclusivity clause, although the latter needs tomust be strengthened and made consistent acrossformally recognised through agreements;
Amendment 124 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 bis (new)
Paragraph 13 bis (new)
13a. The clause on human rights must be implemented without discrimination and apply equally to all countries, not only to fishing agreements but also to trade agreements; through the World Trade Organisation (WTO) we must work towards penalising production in countries that have yet to recognise human rights or use child labour in manufacturing production, as well as discriminating against women by not rewarding or recognising their activities and their economic contribution in fisheries and aquaculture.
Amendment 149 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Reaffirms that EU vessels should not compete with local fishermen for the same resources and that cooperation between local and EU operators should be facilitated;
Amendment 157 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the EU must make increased efforts to help provide the coastal States with which it negotiates bilateral agreements with sufficient data and information for reliable stock assessments, and that providing funding for astates that crewing scientific research vessels in regions where the EU fleet is active would considerably strengthen scientific analyses on fish stocks, which is a prerequisite for any SFA;
Amendment 168 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Urges the Commission to try during the negotiations of SFAs to obtain that the coastal State dedicates a minimum part of the sectoral support for development granted under the SFA to projects which have as their objective the recognition, promotion and diversification of women's role in the fisheries sector, ensuring the application of the principle of equal treatment and opportunities for women and men concerning in particular training and access to funding and loans.
Amendment 173 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Insists that the Commission closely monitor the implementation of bilateral agreements, with annual reports being sent to Parliament and the Council, as well as evaluations performed by external, independent experts to be sent to the co- legislators prior to the negotiation of new protocols, and all of wthich should be in the public domains must be done in an objective, transparent and public manner, and for the purpose of verifying its effectiveness, it is important to monitor the aid to the third country;
Amendment 177 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Underlines the need for Parliament to be wholly involved in both thethe preparation and negotiating process and the long-term monitoring and assessment of the functioning of bilateral agreements, in order to respect the provisions of the TFEU;. Also recalls its conviction that Parliament should be represented at the Joint Committee meetings envisaged in fisheries agreements, and insists that civil society, including both EU and third country fisheries representatives, also participate in those meetings. The Commission must be able to call upon the advice of Community businesses that operate in third country waters, and upon Community businesses that have fisheries investments in those countries, as well as Community social partners present in the sector;
Amendment 179 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 bis (new)
Paragraph 22 bis (new)
22a. Supports the introduction of scientific audits to evaluate fish populations prior to negotiating agreements and that the third country notifies of the fishing effort of the fleets of other countries in its waters in order for these objectives to be effective;
Amendment 181 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Is convinced that full transparency on catches, payments and implementation of sectoral support will be a powerful tool to fighn indispensable tool for developing responsible and sustainable fishing based on good governance and the fight against corruption;
Amendment 192 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 bis (new)
Paragraph 25 bis (new)
25a. Bilateral conventions should be introduced to encourage Community fisheries investments in countries where at present there are no association agreements, because there are no excess fishing opportunities, and to contribute as a result towards sustainable fishing; also in these cases, coordination between European development funding and the bilateral agreements funding should be a top priority;
Amendment 196 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
Paragraph 26
26. Urges the EU to take the lead in strengthening RFMOs in order to improve their performance, including by means of regular reviews by independent bodies of the extent to which they achieve their objectives, and to ensure that the recommendations made in such reviews are genuinely, rapidly and fully implemented; b. Believes that clear cases of lack of compliance by States must lead to effective, proportional and non- discriminatory sanctions, including reductions in quotas, effort, capacity allowed, etc.;
Amendment 210 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that RFMOs must ensure the Maximum Sustainable Development of resources and develop management systems that provide for an equitable and fair resource allocation based upon transparent environmental and social criteria, rather than the simplistic criterion of historical catches, while ensuring that management and conservation measures are fully implemented by all members;
Amendment 225 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 bis (new)
Paragraph 32 bis (new)
32a. Believes that before establishing charges for high sea fishing, the impact that this may have on the fleet must be assessed, ensuring that no unnecessary costs are added that could result in unfair competition or prove discriminatory for normal practice within EU territorial waters or those of third countries; these resources must be used transparently so as to encourage them to contribute to the development of responsible fishing and the improved working of the RFMOs.
Amendment 227 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Considers that the external dimension of the CFP is not limited to bilateral fisheries agreements and the EU’s participation in RFMOs but also includes European external fisheries investments, international trade in fisheries and aquaculture products, private agreements between EU shipowners and third countries, joint ventures by EU companies in third countries and activities by EU nationals on non-EU vessels;
Amendment 228 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 bis (new)
Paragraph 33 bis (new)
33a. We consider that European fisheries investments should be included as a third component in the external dimension of the CFP, together with fishing agreements and the RFMOs; the CFP must encourage sustainable external fisheries investment on the grounds that they are useful for making our fisheries more competitive and consolidating the EU’s position globally, thereby emphasising its role in the generation of wealth and the creation of employment, both in the EU Member States and in third countries.
Amendment 230 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 bis (new)
Paragraph 33 bis (new)
33a. Believes in close collaboration with the players involved in external waters and represented on the Regional Advisory Council for high seas/long distance fleet (LDRAC), in particular, with business associations, trade union organisations, professionals fishing under bilateral agreements, RFMOs and in international waters, as well as with businesses that have investments in fisheries in third countries and possess extensive knowledge of the fisheries in those countries, which would provide a better understanding of resources, fishing areas and fisheries businesses in third countries.
Amendment 231 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33 ter (new)
Paragraph 33 ter (new)
33b. Believes that the CFP must promote strategies for Corporate Social Responsibility, in order to assume fully our social responsibilities, in line with the EU Strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility;
Amendment 238 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34 bis (new)
Paragraph 34 bis (new)
34a. Believes in the need to increase human and financial resources dedicated to external fisheries policy and that in this regard the LDRAC could provide considerable assistance;
Amendment 244 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Expresses its impatience with the Commission for not having added vessels to be included on the EU IUU list other than those listed by the RFMOs, nor having proposed a list of non-cooperating countries, despite the IUU Regulation having been in force for over two years; we agree with the need to seek support from our principal social partners in order to eradicate IUU fishing in all oceans and Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ);
Amendment 265 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Encourages banks and other lending institutions to incorporate assessments of the environmental and sociconomic, social and environmental sustainability of activities, and not simply their short- term profitability, prior to granting access to capital;
Amendment 273 #
2011/2318(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42 – indent 1
Paragraph 42 – indent 1
– be preceded by environmental and sociconomic, social and environmental impact assessments,
Amendment 168 #
2011/2292(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – indent 3
Paragraph 11 – indent 3
– vocational training, in particular for women working in the fisheries sector, in order to grant them better access to managerial and technical jobs related to fishing;
Amendment 177 #
2011/2292(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – indent 6
Paragraph 11 – indent 6
– support for sustainable shellfishing practices, for activities carried out on land and for related professionals, whilst enhancing the role of women in fishingamong others by giving assistance to the people carrying out this activity, very often women, who suffer from diseases due to their work;
Amendment 179 #
2011/2292(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – indent 7
Paragraph 11 – indent 7
– supportenhancing women's role in fishing, in particular by granting support for activities carried out on land, for related professionals and for activities associated with fishing, both upstream and downstream;
Amendment 2 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Citation 17 a (new)
Citation 17 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2010/41/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on the application of the principle of equal treatment between men and women engaged in an activity in a self-employed capacity and repealing Council Directive 86/613/EEC[1], [1] OJ L 180, 15.7.2010, p.1.
Amendment 5 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the present communication recalls that the previous CFP failed to achieve its key objectives: numerous stocks are overfished; the economic situation of parts of the EU fleet is fragile despite highthe levels of subsidy; jobs in the fishing sector are unattractive and are being lost; and the situation of many coastal communities depending on fisheries and aquaculture is precarious;
Amendment 14 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
Recital D
D. whereas there is a need for rigorous social, economic and environmental data, and that according to some estimates 75 % of the EU’s estimated fish stocks are overexploited, more than 60 % of stocks in European waters are fished beyond the Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY), and the EU is losing approximately EUR 1.8 billion per year in potential income from its failure to manage fisheries sustainably;
Amendment 24 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas small-scale fleetsartisanal and small-scale fishing, including shellfishing harvesting and othoseer activities of traditional and extensive aquaculture, and fleets of a larger-scale industrial nature have very different characteristics and problems that cannot be fitted into a uniform model, and thuese aspects need to be treated differently;
Amendment 28 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
Recital H
H. whereas artisanal and small-scale fishing fleets and areas that are heavily dependent on fishingtheir activities require greater socio-economic support under the new CFP;
Amendment 33 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H bis (new)
Recital H bis (new)
Ha. whereas there is a need for the representatives of the sectors of industrial and small-scale fleets and of aquaculture to be involved in the definition and development of the new CFP;
Amendment 34 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Recital H a (new)
H a. Whereas women play a fundamental role in the processing and aquaculture sector, in the exercise of ancillary management and administration tasks, as well as in shellfish gathering; and they are also, although to a smaller extent, active in the catching sector; however, this important contribution is very often not duly recognised and rewarded;
Amendment 35 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Recital H ter (new)
Recital H ter (new)
Hb. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon obliges us to ensure coherence in Union policies, including in the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 43 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the common fisheries policy (wild fisheries and aquaculture sector) needs a thorough and ambitious reform if the EU is to lay the foundations of a socio-economically viable and environmentally sustainable fisheries and aquaculture industry in the Union;
Amendment 47 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that the EU’s wild fisheries and aquaculture sector, if properly managed, could make a greater contribution to European society’s needs, in terms of food security and quality, employment, environmental protection, and the maintenance of the culture of newly dynamic fishing and coastal communities;
Amendment 55 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that incentives should be offered to those who fish sustainably using selective and environment-friendly fishing methods, in order to ensure positivethe generalised use of such fishing practices;
Amendment 67 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Supports the management of fisheries resources on the basis of MSY, in order to phase out overfishing wherever it occurs, ensure biological security and achieve sustainable stock conservation;
Amendment 76 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the objective of achieving MSY based on fishing mortality (FMSY) should be established immediately, as this will in any caseccording to the final Declaration of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, held in Johannesburg from 26 August to 4 September 2002, as this would in any case serve to establish a road map and put the vast majority of stocks on the right track; calls on the Commission and the Member States to implement this objective in an operational manner, based on sound scientific data and taking account of the socio-economic consequences;
Amendment 82 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines, however, the difficulties involved in implementing the MSY principle, in particular in the case of mixed fisheries or where scientific data on fish stocks are unavailable or unreliable;
Amendment 90 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Understands the Commission’s motivations when proposing to implement a discard ban by 2016, and considers that it is right to view such practices as unacceptable in principle, particularly given their harmful impact on numerous essential evaluations relating to sustainable stock management, sound scientific advice, marine ecosystem surveillance and the financialsocio-economic viability of fisheries;
Amendment 97 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Believes that a gradual ban on discards should only be put in place if accompanied by technical measures to reduce unwanted bycatch and incentives to encourage selective fishing practices, provided the ecosystem balance is maintained; priority should go to avoiding unwanted catches in the first place, rather than finding ways to marketthe relative stability of the principle should be reviewed and priority should go to avoiding unwanted catches rather than managing them; also stresses the importance ofneed for stakeholder engagement and for the careful design of the landing obligation and the subsequent treatment thereof, in order not to shift from unwanted fish in the sea to unwanted fish on land;
Amendment 107 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the need for more scientific research to develop tackle and fishing techniques in such a way as to avoid bycatches of non-targeted speciunwanted catches and promote other sustainable fishing methods; underlines the importance of addressing the management of mixed fisheries to this end;
Amendment 112 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the existing technology for reducing or eliminating discards is not equally effective for all types of fisheries; in this respect, calls on the Commission to promote partnerships between scientists and fishermen, consider their opinions when drawing up its policies and assist Member States in the development of new fishing techniques;
Amendment 125 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Expresses its doubts over the proposals relating to the market in bycatches, and stresses that, in case of implementation, adequate safeguards that comply with a predominantly social orientation should be provided in order to avoid the emergence of a parallel market that would paradoxically encourage fishermen to increase their catch;
Amendment 129 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Believes that the discard ban should be based on a step-by-step introduction by fishery, to make it easier for the sector to adapt; stresses that the producers’ organisations should be taken into consideration and be actively involved in the gradual implementation of such a ban;
Amendment 138 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Asks the Commission to assist Member Statdopt sufficient measures into offsetting the diverse socio- economic consequences of adopting a discards ban;
Amendment 145 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 bis (new)
Paragraph 17 bis (new)
17a. Consumers will be guaranteed a diversified range of fish and aquaculture products of certified quality and origin, and sufficient information thereon;
Amendment 148 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 ter (new)
Paragraph 17 ter (new)
17b. Recalls the obligation contained in the Treaty of Lisbon to ensure coherence of the Union’s policies, including in the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 150 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Believes that the reliability and availability of data must be one of the highest priorities of the reform; is concerned at the lack of reliable and available scientific data as well as socio- economic impact evaluations needed for sound scientific advice;
Amendment 152 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Commission to make proposals on effective quality data collection for scientists and for it to be harmonised at the European Union level; urges it, at the same time, to establish a framework, which takes into account the socio-economic impact, for decision- making in data-deficient situations and to come up with scientific models on which to base multi-speciesfic fisheries management;
Amendment 162 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Stresses the importance of involving fishermen, as well as all stakeholders, alongside scientists in contributing to the collection and analysis of socio-economic and environmental information and the active development of research partnerships;
Amendment 173 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that the proposal to introduce ‘Transferable Fishing Concessions’ (TFCs), contained in the basic regulation, raises concerns regarding the concentration and creation of monopolies; stresses that in a number of countries transferable fishing rights have allowed fishing overcapacity to be reduced, which is commendable; emphasises, however, that adequate safeguards would need to be introduced in order to protect small-scale and artisanal coastal fishing (including harvesting shellfish and other traditional and extensive aquaculture activities as well as the natural cultivation of molluscs in coastal waters), which is the most economically endangered part of the industry but also that providing most of the jobs and economic activity in coastal regions;
Amendment 191 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Believes that such a measure should offer priority access to those who fish in a socially and environmentally responsible way; believes that TFCs should not be the only measure proposed for reducing overcapacity, and that a Member State should be exempted from the obligation to introduce TFCs if it achieves the necessary overcapacity reduction without their use; a census system should be maintained in such a way that the transferability of quotas is limited to vessels within the same census, which means the accumulation of fishing rights should be limited, and the historicity of the vessels in the fishery, as well as the socio- economic aspects thereof, must be taken into account when distributing individual fishing concessions;
Amendment 210 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Considers that the economic viability of the fisheries sector is affected by the recent rise in oil prices; calls on the Commission to come up with suitable measures to improve fuel efficiency in the fisheries and aquaculture sector, to alleviate the difficult economic situation in which European fishermen and fish farmers find themselves, and to propose in this respect an action plan for coastal regions and islands;
Amendment 231 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29 a (new)
Paragraph 29 a (new)
29 a. Considers that women's role in the fisheries sector should be given greater legal and social recognition and recompense; insists that women in the fisheries sector in every respect enjoy rights equal to men's, for example as far as membership and eligibility in governing bodies of fisheries organisations is concerned; considers that the spouses and life partners of fishermen supporting the family undertaking should de facto be given a legal status and social benefits equivalent to those enjoyed by people with self-employed status, as provided for by Directive 2010/41/EU; considers further that funding from the European Fisheries Fund and the future European Maritime and Fisheries Fund should be made available for training specifically tailored for women working in the fisheries sector;
Amendment 234 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
Paragraph 30
30. Believes that the reform of the CFP may, in the short term, lead to job losses, especially in the catching sector, thus affecting the growth of coastal communities and islands; stresses, in this respect, that there is a need for accompanying socio-economic measures, including professional cooperation and a plan for jobs, in order to make the sector more attractive to young people and provide incentives to enter the sector; calls on the Commission to examine and promote cooperation with the European Investment Bank in order to leverage investment in the sector;
Amendment 236 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 bis (new)
Paragraph 30 bis (new)
30a. Considers it necessary to promote the development of innovations and activities related to the field of fisheries, which can offset the loss of jobs due to the adjustments arising from the reform of the CFP; urges the Commission to develop specific programmes dedicated to the development of fishing tourism and other areas of economic development linked to the sea and fishing activity;
Amendment 243 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Shares the view expressed in the Commission proposal regarding the need for adaptation and specific measures, based on the disparate realities of the European fishing and aquaculture industry, and especially in the case of the Union’s coastal areas and outermost regions; supports the idea of establishing regionalisation as one of the main instruments of this new governance, in order to respond adequately to the needs of each sea basin and incentivise adherence to rules adopted at European level;
Amendment 263 #
2011/2290(INI)
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Believes, more generally, that the role of the RACs should be strengthened; in this respect, urges the Commission to table a new proposal aimed at strengthening the participation of stakeholders and artisanal and small- scale fisheries, thus leading to genuine regionalisation in the CFP; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission’s proposal to set up a Black Sea Advisory Council; the RACs must advise the Parliament and the Council on the adoption of multi-annual plans, and involve scientists in the adoption of their decisions;
Amendment 22 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 1
Horizon 2020 shall ensure the effective promotion of gender equality and the gender dimension in research and innovation content. balance in all programmes, in evaluation committees, in expert and advisory groups and in any decision-making body existing or created for its implementation. To this end, targets will be developed, and appropriate programmes to reach those targets will be implemented.
Amendment 23 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In research projects involving the participation of human beings as research subjects or end users, Horizon 2020 shall ensure that due account is taken of the gender dimension in research and innovation at all stages of the procedure, including setting priorities, drawing up calls for proposals, assessing and monitoring programmes and projects, as well as conducting negotiations and concluding agreements.
Amendment 24 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15a Human Resources Fostering human resources for science, technology and innovation across Europe shall be a priority in Horizon 2020. Horizon 2020 shall contribute to the promotion and attractiveness of researchers' careers across the Union in the context of the European Research Area.
Amendment 25 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 b (new)
Article 15 b (new)
Article 15b Open access With a view to fostering wider use and dissemination of results, and thereby boosting European innovation, free open access to publications resulting from research funded by Horizon 2020 shall be mandatory. Open access to scientific data produced or collected within research funded by Horizon 2020 shall be promoted.
Amendment 26 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17 a (new)
Article 17a Synergies with the Structural Funds Horizon 2020 shall contribute to the closing of the research and innovation divide within the European Union by enabling synergies with the Cohesion Policy in support to research and innovation through the coordinated implementation of complementary measures. Where possible, interoperability between the two instruments will be promoted and cumulative or combined funding will be encouraged.
Amendment 27 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 3
Article 18 – paragraph 3
3. The integrated approach set out in paragraphs 1 and 2 is expected to lead to aroundshall lead to at least 15% of the total combined budget for the specific objective on "Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies" and the priority "Societal challenges" going to SMEs.
Amendment 28 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Public-private partnerships shall be identified and implemented in an open and transparent way based on all of the following criteria:
Amendment 29 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) the scale of impact on industrial competitiveness, sustainable growth and socio-economic issues through the definition of clear and measurable societal and competitiveness objectives, including job creation and educational/training targets, and accountability with regard to the achievement of these objectives;
Amendment 30 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) the long-term commitment, including a balanced contribution, from all partners based on a shared vision and clearly defined objectives;
Amendment 31 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)
(e a) compliance with the rules of participation of the Horizon 2020 programme, particularly with regard to intellectual property rights, transparency and openness;
Amendment 32 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)
(e b) complementarity with other parts of Horizon 2020 and its alignment with the Union research and innovation strategic agenda;
Amendment 33 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e c (new)
Article 19 – paragraph 3 – point e c (new)
(e c) the involvement of all interested partners across the entire value chain, including the end users, SMEs and research institutes, in the partnership.
Amendment 34 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Targeted actions with the objective of promoting cooperation with specific third countries or groups of third countries, in particular the EU’s strategic partners, shall be implemented on the basis of common interest and mutual benefit, taking into account their scientific and technological capabilities and market opportunities, and the expected impact.
Amendment 35 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2
Article 22 – paragraph 2
Activities to disseminate information and carry out communication activities shall be an integral task under all of the actions supported by Horizon 2020. The inclusion of the gender dimension in dissemination and communication activities will be part of effective schemes and will be assessed.
Amendment 36 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point c
Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) actions which bring together results from a range of projects, including those that may be funded from other sources, to provide user-friendly databases and reports that summarise key findings, and their communication and dissemination to the scientific community and the general public;
Amendment 37 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall annually monitor the implementation of Horizon 2020, its specific programme and the activities of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology. This shall include information and indicators on cross-cutting topics such as gender, sustainability and climate change, including information on the amount of climate related expenditure.
Amendment 38 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – paragraph 1
Annex 1 – paragraph 1
Horizon 2020 has the general objective to build an econom society based on knowledge and innovation across the whole Union, while contributing to sustainable development. It will support the Europe 2020 strategy and other Union policies as well as the achievement and functioning of the European Research Area.
Amendment 39 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Annex 1 – paragraph 3 a (new)
All three priorities shall include an international dimension. International scientific and technological cooperation is a critical issue for the Union and, as a consequence, Horizon 2020 will support it in three main dimensions: - promoting scientific and technological (S&T) cooperation with the most advanced centres of knowledge in the world, in order to achieve and share the most advanced standards of excellence, and to pursue competition at the highest levels; - promoting international S&T cooperation for capacity building, helping institutions in the Union, from the very start, to contribute to and to share the benefits of the fast expansion of R&D capabilities and human resources world- wide; - promoting S&T cooperation for peace and stability world-wide, recognising the fundamental role that the human and societal values of science and research can play in consolidating fragile societies and mitigating international conflicts.
Amendment 40 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – paragraph 14 – point b
Annex 1 – paragraph 14 – point b
(b) Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritimehealthy and sustainable marine, maritime and inland water research, and the bio- economy;
Amendment 43 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Furthermore, while 60% of European university graduates are women, only 18% of grade-A researchers are women, as compared to 27% in the USA. The low number of women who are able to pursue scientific careers is a dramatic waste, a loss of talent, and a barrier to excellence in European research.
Amendment 44 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 2
ERC funding shall be awarded in accordance with the following well- established principles. Scientific excellence shall be the sole criterion on which ERC grants are awarded. The ERC shall operate on a ‘bottom-up’ basis without predetermined priorities. The ERC grants shall be open to individual teams of researchers of any age and from any country in the world, working in Europe. And the ERC shall aim to foster healthy competition across Europe. and shall ensure that unconscious gender bias is properly tackled in evaluation procedures.
Amendment 45 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 5
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 1 – point 1.3 – paragraph 5
By 2020, the ERC therefore shall aim to demonstrate: that the best researchers are participating in the ERC’s competitions, that ERC funding has led directly to scientific publications of the highest quality and to the commercialisation and application of innovative technologies and ideas and that the ERC has contributed significantly to making Europe a more attractive environment for the world’s best scientists. In particular, the ERC shall target a measurable improvement in the Union’s share of the world’s top 1 % most highly cited publications. In addition it shall aim at a substantial increase in the number of excellent researchers from outside Europe whom it funds, including a sharp increase in the number of excellent female researchers, and specific improvements in institutional practices and national policies to support top researchers.
Amendment 46 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.1 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Mobility programmes shall ensure effective equal opportunities between men and women and include specific measures to remove obstacles to the mobility of female researchers.
Amendment 47 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point b – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point b – paragraph 2
Key activities shall be to encourage experienced researchers to broaden or deepen their skills by means of mobility by opening attractive career opportunities in universities, research institutions, businesses, SMEs and other socio- economic groups all over Europe and beyond, offering researchers the opportunity to be trained and to acquire new knowledge in a high-level research organisation in third-country, and subsequently return. Opportunities to restart a research career after a break shall also be supported.
Amendment 48 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point d – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point d – paragraph 2
Key activities shall be, with the aid of a co- funding mechanism, to encourage regional, national and international organisations to create new programmes and to open existing ones to international and intersectoral training, mobility and career development. This will increase the quality of research training in Europe at all career stages, including at doctoral level, will foster free circulation of researchers and scientific knowledge in Europe, will promote attractive research careers by offering open recruitment and attractive working conditions and will support research and innovation cooperation between universities, research institutions and enterprises and cooperation with third countries and international organisations. Special attention should be given to gender equality and structural change.
Amendment 49 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point e – paragraph 1
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 3 – point 3.3 – point e – paragraph 1
The goals are to monitor progress, identify gaps in and barriers to the Marie Curie Actions and to increase their impact. In this context, indicators shall be developed and data related to researchers’' mobility, skills and careers as well as gender equality shall be analysed, seeking synergies and close coordination with the policy support actions on researchers, their employers and funders carried out under the specific objective ' Inclusive, innovative and secure societiesResponsible research and innovation'. The activity shall further aim at raising awareness of the importance and attractiveness of a research career and at disseminating research and innovation results emanating from work supported by Marie Curie actions. It shall also include specific measures with the aim of removing barriers to women's mobility.
Amendment 50 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 4 a (new)
Annex 1 – section 1 – point 4 a (new)
Amendment 52 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – introductory part
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – introductory part
2. Food security, sustainable agriculture, marine and maritimehealthy and sustainable marine, maritime and inland water research, and the bio- economy;
Amendment 54 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 1
The specific objective is to secure sufficient supplies of safe and high quality healthy food and other bio-based products, by developing productive and resource- efficient primary production and food processing systems, fostering related ecosystem services, along side competitive and low carbon supply chains. This will accelerate the transition to a sustainable European bio-economy.
Amendment 55 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.1 – paragraph 2
Over the coming decades, Europe will be challenged by increased competition for limited and finite natural resources, by the effects of climate change, in particular on primary production systems (agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture) and by the need to provide a sustainable, safe and secure food supply for the European and an increasing global population. A 70 % increase of the world food supply is estimated to be required to feed the 9 billion global population by 2050 (research should be commensurate with to the potential of the various food sources). Agriculture accounts for about 10 % of Union greenhouse gases emissions, and while declining in Europe, global emissions from agriculture are projected to increase up to 20 % by 2030. Furthermore, Europe will need to ensure sufficient supplies of raw materials, energy and industrial products, under conditions of decreasing fossil carbon resources (oil and liquid gas production expected to decrease by about 60 % by 2050), while maintaining its competitiveness. Bio-waste (estimated at up to 138 million tonnes per year in the Union, of which up to 40 % is land-filled) represents a huge problem and cost, despite its high potential added value. For example, an estimated 30 % of all food produced in developed countries is discarded. Major changes are needed to reduce this amount by 50 % in the Union by 203026. In addition, national borders are irrelevant in the spread of animal and plant pests and diseases, including zoonotic diseases, and food borne pathogens. While effective national prevention measures are needed, action at Union level is essential for ultimate control and the effective running of the single market. The challenge is complex, affects a broad range of interconnected sectors and requires a plurality of approaches.
Amendment 58 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 2
A fully functional European bio-economy – encompassing the sustainable production of renewable resources from land, marine and aquatic environments and their conversion into food, bio-based products and bioenergy as well as the related public goods - will generate high European added value. Managed in a sustainable manner, it can reduce the environmental footprint of primary production and the supply chain as a whole. It can increase their competitiveness and provide jobs and business opportunities for rural and coastal development. The food security, sustainable agriculture, and overall bio- economy – related challenges are of a European and global nature. Actions at Union level are essential to bring together clusters to achieve the necessary breadth and critical mass to complement efforts made by a single or groups of Member States. A multi-actor approach will ensure the necessary cross-fertilising interactions between researcher, businesses, farmers/producers, advisors and end-users. The Union level is also necessary to ensure coherence in addressing this challenge across sectors and with strong links to relevant Union policies. Coordination of research and innovation at Union level will stimulate and help to accelerate the required changes across the Union.
Amendment 60 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 3
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.2 – paragraph 3
Research and innovation will interface with a wide spectrum of Union policies and related targets, including the Common Agriculture Policy (in particular the Rural Development Policy) and the European Innovation Partnership 'Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability', the Common Fisheries Policy, the Integrated Maritime Policy, the European Climate Change Programme, the Water Framework Directive, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, the Forestry Action Plan, the Soil Thematic Strategy, the Union's 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, the Strategic Energy Technology Plan, the Union's innovation and industrial policies, external and development aid policies, plant health strategies, animal health and welfare strategies and regulatory frameworks to protect the environment, health and safety, to promote resource efficiency and climate action, and to reduce waste. A better integration of the full cycle from fundamental research andto innovation into related Union policies will significantly improve their European added value, provide leverage effects, increase societal relevance, provide healthy food products and help to further develop sustainable land, seas and oceans management and bio- economy markets.
Amendment 61 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point c – introductory part
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point c – introductory part
(c) Unlocking the potential of aquatic living resourcfisheries, aquaculture and marine biotechnologies
Amendment 69 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point d a (new)
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 2 – point 2.3 – point d a (new)
(da) Cross-cutting marine and maritime research The exploitation of living and non-living marine resources, the use of different sources of marine energy and the wide range of different uses that is made of the seas raise cross-cutting scientific and technological challenges. Seas and oceans also play a crucial role in climate regulation, but they are heavily impacted by inland, coastal and maritime human activities and by climate change. The overall aim is to develop cross-cutting marine and maritime scientific and technological knowledge with a view to unlocking the blue growth potential across the range of marine and maritime industries, while protecting the marine environment and adapting to climate change. This strategic coordinated approach for marine and maritime research across all challenges and pillars of Horizon 2020 will also support the implementation of relevant Union policies to help deliver key blue growth objectives.
Amendment 71 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.1 – paragraph 4
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.1 – paragraph 4
The growing impacts from climate change and environmental problems, such as ocean acidification, changes in ocean circulation, the increase in seawater temperature, ice melting in the Arctic, land degradation and use, water shortages, chemical pollution and biodiversity loss, indicate that the planet is approaching its sustainability boundaries. For example, without improvements in efficiency, water demand is projected to overshoot supply by 40 % in 20 years time. Forests are disappearing at an alarmingly high rate of 5 million hectares per year. Interactions between resources can cause systemic risks – with the depletion of one resource generating an irreversible tipping point for other resources and ecosystems. Based on current trends, the equivalent of more than two planet Earths will be needed by 2050 to support the growing global population.
Amendment 72 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.2 – paragraph 4
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 5 – point 5.2 – paragraph 4
Addressing the availability of raw materials calls for co-ordinated research and innovation efforts across many disciplines and sectors to help provide safe, economically feasible, environmentally sound and socially acceptable solutions along the entire value chain (exploration, extraction, processing, re-use, recycling and substitution). Water challenges include water use in rural, urban and industrial environments and the protection of aquatic ecosystems. Innovation in these fields will provide opportunities for growth and jobs, as well as innovative options involving science, technology, the economy, policy and governance. For this reason, a European Innovation Partnerships on Water Efficiency and Raw Materials isare being prepared.
Amendment 73 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.1 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Annex 1 – section 3 – point 6.3 – point 6.3.1 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(ba) strive to set European models for social cohesion and well-being as international benchmarks; and make efforts to comply with the ILO’s recommendations on fostering research and training pertaining to health, hygiene and safety in the workplace.
Amendment 75 #
2011/0401(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – section 5 – point 1 – paragraph 2
Annex 1 – section 5 – point 1 – paragraph 2
Europe is facing a number of structural weaknesses when it comes to innovation capacity and the ability to deliver new services, products and processes. Among the main issues at hand are Europe's relatively poor record in talent attraction and retention; the underutilisation of existing research strengths in terms of creating economic or social value; low levels of entrepreneurial activity; a scale of resourcesthe lack of research results brought to the market; low levels of entrepreneurial activity and the lack of an entrepreneurial mindset; low levels of public investment in R&D, a scale of resources, including human resources, in poles of excellence which is insufficient to compete globally; and an excessive number of barriers to collaboration within the knowledge triangle of higher education, research and business on a European level.
Amendment 202 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 18
Recital 18
(18) The achievement of the objectives of the CFP would also be undermined if Union financial assistance under EMFF is paid to Member States who do not comply with their obligation to achieve a stable balance between the fishing fleet and fishing opportunities as defined in Article 34.1 of the regulation of the CFP or with their obligations under the CFP rules related to the public interest of conservation of marine biological resources, such as collecting data and implementing the control obligations. Moreover, without complying with those obligations there is a risk that inadmissible beneficiaries or ineligible operations are not detected by the Member States. .
Amendment 251 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 36
Recital 36
(36) In order to address health and safety needs on board, and consistency with the other policies, the EMFF should only support investments covering safety and hygiene on board for those vessels operating in fisheries which have demonstrated there is no overcapacity. These investments should not increase the catch potential of the vessel.
Amendment 483 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 6
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – point 6
(6) 'fisherman' means any person engaging in professional fishing, as recognised by the Member State, on board of an operational fishing vessel or engaging in professional harvesting of marine organisms, as recognised by the Member State, without a vesselregardless of whether they receive a salary, operator in the fisheries sector;
Amendment 534 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) promoting sustainable and competitiveconomically, socially and environmentally sustainable fisheries and aquaculture;
Amendment 558 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) fostering the implementation of the CFP.
Amendment 564 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
The achievement of the objectives of the EMFF shall contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. It shall be pursued through the following six Union priorities, which translate the relevant Thematic Objectives of the Common Strategic Framework (hereinafter CSF):. These objectives are all related to fishing and its integration into maritime activities or coastal and inland communities dependent on fishing and aquaculture.
Amendment 714 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
In addition to the principles enounced in Article 4 of the [Regulation (EU) No […] laying down Common Provisions], the Commission and the Member States shall ensure coordination and complementarity between support from the EMFF and from other Union policies and financial instruments, including the Regulation (EC) No [establishing the Framework Programme for Environment and Climate Change Action (LIFE Framework Programme)]1 and those in the framework of the Union's external action. Coordination between assistance from the EMFF and LIFE Framework Programme shall be achieved in particular, by promoting the funding of activities that complement integrated projects funded under LIFE Framework Programme, as well as by promoting the use of solutions, methods and approaches validated under LIFE Framework Programme. This coordination and complementarity shall be included in the Operational Programme, which defines the policy and the specific instruments.
Amendment 806 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) any onboard investment on vessels where there is no balance between fleet capacity and available fishing opportunities, as defined in Article 34.1 of the CFP Regulation
Amendment 914 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii a (new)
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point j – point ii a (new)
(ii)(a) flexibilisation of criteria to allow annual transfers of funds
Amendment 919 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point m
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point m
(m) the designation of the partners referred to in Article 5 of the [Regulation (EU) No [...] laying down Common Provisions] and the results of the consultation of the partners; replacements of or changes to the partners may be carried out during the programme with the agreement of the Monitoring Committee;
Amendment 956 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
1. For the purpose of application of Article 20(1)(o), Member States shall submit to the Commission an multiannual work plans before 31 October each year. AnnualThese work plans shall contain a description of the procedures and methods to be used in collecting and analysing data and in estimating their accuracy and precision.
Amendment 960 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3
Article 23 – paragraph 3
Amendment 972 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1
Article 25 – paragraph 1
1. To implement Chapters I and II of Title VI and Article 92, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, adopt present a multiannual work programme in accordance with objectives set out in those Chapters. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 151(3).
Amendment 976 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 2
Article 25 – paragraph 2
2. The multiannual work programme shall set out the objectives pursued, the expected results, the method of implementation and its total amount. It shall also contain a description of the activities to be financed, an indication of the amount allocated to each activity, an indicative implementation timetable, as well as information on their implementation. It shall include for grants the priorities, the essential evaluation criteria and the maximum rate of co- financing, as well as annual reports on budget implementation.
Amendment 987 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1
Article 28 – paragraph 1
1. In order to stimulate innovation in fisheries, the EMFF may support projects aiming at developing or introducing new or substantially improved products compared to the state of art, new or improved processes, new or improved management and organisation systems, provided that they contribute to achieving Article 2 of this Regulation.
Amendment 993 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 2
Article 28 – paragraph 2
2. Operations financed under this Article must be carried out in collaboration with a scientific or, technical or economic body recognised to be of proven solvency by the Member State or the EU which shall validate the results of such operations.
Amendment 1014 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2
Article 29 – paragraph 2
2. The feasibility studies and advice referred to respectively in paragraph 1(a) and (b) shall be provided by recognised scientific or technical bodies with the required advisory competences as recognised by the national law of each Member State. or companies of proven solvency that can provide advice on business and marketing strategies.
Amendment 1024 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 5
Article 29 – paragraph 5
5. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall take the form of lump sums not exceeding the amount of 3 000 Euro. This limit shall not apply when the beneficiary is an organisation of fishermennormal market amount. The method used to establish the amount shall be set out in the selection criteria.
Amendment 1030 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) specific actions and pilot projects and also the creation of a network composed by one or more independent scientific bodies and fishermen or one or more organisations of fishermen, organisations of fishermen, social and environmental organisations with the participation of those public bodies of EU Member States that wish to do so;
Amendment 1032 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 30 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the activities carried out by a network as referred inin accordance with point (a).
Amendment 1063 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 2
Article 31 – paragraph 2
2. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall also be granted to spouses of self- employed fishermen or, when and in so far as recognised by national law,fishermen or the life partners of self-employed fishermen, not being employees or business partners, where they habitually, under the conditions laid down by national law, participate in thefishing activities of the self- employed fishermen or perform ancillary taskssuch as co-operatives, social economy enterprises, jointly-owned businesses, etc.
Amendment 1071 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 32 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. In order to facilitate diversification and job creation outside fishing, the EMFF may support:
Amendment 1121 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. Support under paragraph 1(b) shall be granted to small scale coastal fishermen owning a Union fishing vesselthe fishing capacity of the fishing vessel, and, where appropriate, the fishing licence associated with it, registered as active and which have carried out fishing activities at sea at least 60 days during the two years preceding the date of submission of the application. The fishing licence associated with the fishing vessel shall be permanently withdrawn.
Amendment 1172 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 – paragraph 2
Article 33 – paragraph 2
2. The support shall be granted to fishermen or owners of fishing vessels. who operate in fisheries in which an effective balance between fishing opportunities and fishing capacity has been shown.
Amendment 1202 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – title
Article 34 – title
Support to systems of transferable fishing concessionallocation of fishing opportunities of the CFP
Amendment 1223 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the design and development of technical and administrative means necessary for the creation or functioning of a transferable fishing concessions systeminnovative systems which give preferential access to operators who act in a more sustainable way;
Amendment 1246 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 a (new)
Article 34 a (new)
Article 34a Support for the development and implementation of multiannual plans (Article 9-11 Common Fisheries Policy Regulation) 1. To ensure the effective implementation of the multiannual plans under Articles 9- 11 of the (Common Fisheries Policy Regulation), the EMFF may wish to support: (a) the participation of the actors involved in the design and development of the multiannual plans; (b) the implementation of the multiannual plans; (c) the management of the multiannual plans. The support referred to under (1c) should only be made available to public authorities.
Amendment 1345 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) management, restoration and monitoring NATURA 2000 sites in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora13 and Council and European Parliament Directive 2009/147/EC of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds24, in accordance with prioritised action frameworks established pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC; 1 OJ L 206 , 22.7.1992 p.7. 2 OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7. 3 OJ L 206 , 22.7.1992 p.7. 4 OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7.as laid down in the CFP, where operations have a direct effect on the fishing sector; Or. es
Amendment 1349 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) management, restoration and monitoring of marine protected areas in view of the implementation of the spatial protection measures referred to in Article 1 OJ L 206, 22.7.1992 p.7. 2 OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7. 3 OJ L 206, 22.7.1992 p.7. 4 OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7. 13(4) of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/56/EC3(4) of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2008/56/EC; as laid down in the CFP, where operations have a direct effect on the fishing sector;
Amendment 1356 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) the participation in other actions aimed at maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services, such as the restoration of specific marine and coastal habitats in support of sustainable fish stocks.; as laid down in the CFP, where operations have a direct effect on the fishing sector;
Amendment 1376 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) investments on board aimed at reducing the emission of pollutants or green-house gases and increasing energy efficiency of fishing vessels;, if it is shown that the investment will not lead to an increase in possible catches.
Amendment 1386 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2
Article 39 – paragraph 2
Amendment 1405 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3
Article 39 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1440 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 4
Article 40 – paragraph 4
4. The support referred to in paragraph 1 shall only be granted to owners of Union fishing vessels operating in fisheries where there has been shown to be a sufficient balance between fishing opportunities and fishing capacity, as defined in Article 34(1) of the CFP Regulation, and whose vessels are which have carried a fishing activity for at least 60 days at sea during the two years preceding the date of submission of the application.
Amendment 1549 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) developing or, innovating and introducing in the market new or substantially improved products compared to the state of art, new or improved processes, new or improvedin accordance with the techniques referred to by the OECD in new processes or management and organisation systems.
Amendment 1632 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new)
e a) the promotion of equal opportunities, especially with regard to gender equality and the integration of disabled people
Amendment 1636 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new)
e b) g) the improvement of working conditions, including reconciling work with family life
Amendment 1639 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e c (new)
Article 48 – paragraph 2 – point e c (new)
e c) the promotion of professional training and access to work for young people in the fishing and aquaculture sector, especially in the coastal areas most affected by unemployment as a result of the crisis or the Reform of the CFP
Amendment 1641 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 3
Article 48 – paragraph 3
3. Support under paragraph (1)(a) shall only be granted to public law bodies selected to set up the farm advisory services. Support under paragraph (1)(b) shall only be granted to aquaculture SMEs or, aquaculture producer's organisations. and associations of aquaculture producers
Amendment 1659 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) networking and exchange of experience and best practice among aquaculture enterprises or professional and social organisations and other stakeholders, including scientific bodies or those promoting equal opportunities between men and women.
Amendment 1743 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 54 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) forms of extensive aquaculture includingarising from conservation and improvement of the environment, biodiversity, and management of the landscape and traditional features of aquaculture zones.
Amendment 1774 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 56 – paragraph 4
Article 56 – paragraph 4
4. Support may also be granted to public law bodieIn order to meet the requirements of this article, the EMFF shall promote, finance and subsidise these actions.
Amendment 1793 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
da) costs arising from the collection and destruction of dead animals on the farm due to natural causes, farm accidents, slaughter and burial on the farm, on the grounds of animal health and prior official authorisation.
Amendment 1854 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 62 – paragraph 3 – point b
Article 62 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) ensure a significantmajority representation of fisheries and aquaculture sectors.
Amendment 1966 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
Article 71 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii
(iii) direct marketing of fishery products by small scale coastal fishermen, grassroots fishermen, shellfish gatherers and pickers;
Amendment 1992 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 71 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 71 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The EMFF may also support: (a) media campaigns; (b) the organisation of and participation in trade fairs and events for the sector; (c) innovation in enterprises, as defined for extractive fishing; (d) training in innovation; (e) finding new markets.
Amendment 2018 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
da) Improving the competitiveness and economic viability of enterprises
Amendment 2023 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
db) Improved working conditions, hygiene, and public health standards and quality
Amendment 2029 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new)
dc) Increased production capacity when there is a good market outlook
Amendment 2034 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d d (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d d (new)
dd) Innovation and research in enterprises and organisations in the sector
Amendment 2037 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d e (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d e (new)
d e) Training workers in innovation
Amendment 2039 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d f (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d f (new)
d f) Social measures for workers
Amendment 2040 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d g (new)
Article 72 – paragraph 1 – point d g (new)
d g) Measures to facilitate dialogue and cooperation among stakeholders
Amendment 2068 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 78 – paragraph 1
Article 78 – paragraph 1
1. The EMFF may support the implementation of a Union control, inspection and enforcement system as provided for in Article 46 of the [Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy] and specified in Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy ( ), as well as installation of the necessary components to ensure the traceability of fisheries products pursuant to Article 58 of the Control Regulation.
Amendment 2135 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Support under this Chapter shall foster and contribute to the development and implementation of the Union's Integrated Maritime Policy. It shall:
Amendment 2139 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) promoting dialogue and cooperation with and among Member States and stakeholders on marine and maritime issues, including by developing sea-basin strategies;
Amendment 2145 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
Article 81 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part
(b) Contribute to the development of cross- sectoral initiatives that are mutually beneficial to different maritimne sectors and/or sectoral policies, taking into account and building upon existing tools and initiatives, such as:
Amendment 2157 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) studies;, projects, including pilot projects
Amendment 2159 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 82 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 2175 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 84 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 84 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) voluntary contributions to international organisations; voluntary and compulsory contributions to the RFOs should be financed using the same criteria set out by the Common Financial Framework.
Amendment 2214 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point e
Article 94 – paragraph 3 – point e
(e) 6580 % of the eligible expenditure for the support referred to in Article 79.
Amendment 2307 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 108 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) providing the Commission, on a quarterlyn annual basis, with relevant data on operations selected for funding, including key characteristics of the beneficiary and the operation itself;
Amendment 2431 #
2011/0380(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 147 – paragraph 1
Article 147 – paragraph 1
1. If the Commission considers that Union funds have not been used in accordance with the conditions laid down in this Regulation or in any other applicable Union legal act, it shall notify the beneficiaries who shall have one month from the date of such notification to send their observations to the Commission. and the latter shall take account of settled case law by the Court of Justice of 29 September 2009
Amendment 879 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 16/33
Annex I – Volume 16/33
add the following rail freight transport sections to the core network: – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Granada – Motril – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – León – Gijón / Avilés – Palencia – Santander – Madrid – Cáceres – Mérida – Mérida – Badajoz – Portuguese border – Mora – Ciudad Real – Mérida
Amendment 881 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 16/33
Annex I – Volume 16/33
Amendment 892 #
2011/0294(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 17/33
Annex I – Volume 17/33
add the following rail passenger transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almendricos – Águilas – Barcelona – Massanet – Barcelona – Puigcerdá – Játiva – Alcoy – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Villalba – Segovia
Amendment 467 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 34
Recital 34
(34) Fisheries management based on the best available scientific advice requires harmonised, reliable and accurate data sets. Therefore Member sStates should collect data on fleets and their fishing activities, in particular biological data on catches, including discards, and survey information on fish stocks and on the potential environmental impact of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem, and should make them available to end-users and the public at large.
Amendment 541 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 51 a (new)
Recital 51 a (new)
(51a) Union financial assistance should facilitate the development of public goods and services in the fisheries sector, and in particular support control and monitoring measures, information gathering, research and the development of activities aimed at ensuring a healthy marine ecosystem.
Amendment 575 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) conservation, management and exploitation of marine biological resources; and __________________ 33, fresh water resources and aquaculture; and OJ L 60, 53.3.2008, p. 1.
Amendment 581 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) fresh water biological resources, aquaculture, and the processing and marketing of fisheries and aquaculture products, in relation to measures on markets and financial measures in support of the Common Fisheries Policy.
Amendment 596 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) in Union waters, including by fishing vessels flying the flag of, and registered in, third countries, in accordance with the provisions of international fisheries agreements; or
Amendment 597 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
Part 1 – article 1 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters, in accordance with the rules of the waters in which they operate; or
Amendment 602 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 1
1. The Common Fisheries Policy shall ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities provide long-term sustainable environmental, economic and social conditionssocial, economic and environmental conditions ensuring social protection and improving employment and the quality of life in fisheries areas, promoting the competitiveness of the sector and achieving a single market for seafood, and contributeing to the availability of food supplies.
Amendment 617 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 2
2. The Common Fisheries Policy shall apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and if the socio- economic sustainability of the sector permits, shall aim to ensure, by 2015 wherever possible, that exploitation of living marine biological resources restores and maintains populations of harvested species aboveround levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield or keeps them within biologically safe levels.
Amendment 640 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3
Part 1 – article 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Common Fisheries Policy shall implement the ecosystem-basedan approach to fisheries management tohat ensures that the impacts of fishing activities on the marine ecosystem are limited.
Amendment 682 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) eliminate unwanted catches of commercial stocks and gradually ensure that all catches of such stocks are landedimprove the selectivity of the fishing gear used, such as to gradually reduce unwanted catches of commercial stocks, promote the use of species that are discarded and gradually ensure that all catches of such stocks are landed, within the context of the corresponding multiannual plans and in accordance with the provisions of Article 15;
Amendment 703 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) provide conditions for efficient fishing activities within an economically viable and competitive fishing industry, in order to achieve a single market for seafood, recognising the importance of coastal and artisanal fishing and shellfishing as generators of wealth and a model for sustainable exploitation;
Amendment 733 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
Part 1 – article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) contribute toensure a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities;, including aquaculture and on-shore support industries and activities, while promoting measures aimed at genuine gender equality in this area in view of the special role played by women in marine/fishing activities; (Article 2 of Regulation 2371/2002)
Amendment 785 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) clear definition of the responsibilities atwarded to the Union, and those assigned to the Member States, in line with the principle of subsidiarity, at national, regional and local levels; (see the CMO Regulation).
Amendment 793 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) establishment of measures in accordance with the best available scientific advice, and the corresponding socio-economic impact studies, taking into account the need to make the relevant adjustments gradually;
Amendment 813 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e
Amendment 816 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f
Part 1 – article 4 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) consistence with the integrated maritime policy, and with other Union policiesother policies of the European Union.
Amendment 842 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 6
‘maximum sustainable yield’ means the maximaverage equilibrium catch that may be taken from a fish stock indefinitelyobtained from a given marine stock or biological resource or, in the case of mixed fisheries, from the total for species taken as a whole;
Amendment 860 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 7
‘precautionary approach to fisheries management’ means an approach according to which the absence of adequate scientific information should not justify postponing or failing to take management measures to conserve target species, associated or dependent species and non-target species and their environmentthe management of fisheries through the setting of conservation limits determined using scientific criteria that factor in current uncertainties and make it possible to establish the measures to be adopted in the event of those limits being exceeded;
Amendment 867 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 8
‘ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management’ means an approach ensuring that benefits from living aquatic resources are high while the direct and indirect impacts of fishing operations on marine ecosystems are low and not detrithe management of ecosystems and natural habitats in order to satisfy human needs through the use of natural resources while also preserving both the biological wealth and the ecological processes needed to maintain the composition, structure and functioning of the ecosystem habitats concerned, with the aim of such management al to the future functioning, diversity and integrity of those ecosystems; so being to achieve sustainable development on three counts, with these being environmental protection, social justice and cohesion and economic prosperity;
Amendment 878 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 9
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 9
‘fishing mortality rate’ means the cratches of a stock over a given period as a proportion of the average stock available to the fishery in that periode at which individuals of species and biomass are being removed from a stock by means of fishery activities;
Amendment 881 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 10
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 10
‘stock’ means a marine biological resource with distinctive characteristics that occurs in a given management area;
Amendment 890 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 12
‘conservation reference point’ means values of fish stock population parameters (such as biomass or fishing mortality rate) used in fisheries management, for example with respect toany of the values estimated for a stock using scientific procedures, which may relate to the biomass of individuals of reproductive age or to fishing mortality and which, when exceeded, trigger an alarm and acceptable level of biological risk or a desired level of yield process of stock recovery or protection;
Amendment 900 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 13
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 13
‘safeguard’ means a precautionary measure designed to protect or prevenagainst something undesirable occurring;
Amendment 905 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 14
Part 1 – article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 14
‘technical measures’ means the measures that regulate the species composition, size composition of catches and impacts on components of the ecosystems resulting from fishing activities through conditioning the use and structure of fishing gear and restriction of access to fishing areas;
Amendment 925 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 17
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 17
– 'transferable fishing concessions' means revocable user entitlements to a specific part of fishing opportunities allocated to a Member State or established in management plans adopted by a Member State in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1967/200634, which the holder may transfer to other eligible holders of such transferable fishing concessions; __________________ 34OJ L 409, 30.12.2006, p. 11.
Amendment 937 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 19
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 19
– '‘fishing capacity'’ means a vessel's tonnage in GT (Gross Tonnage) and its power in kW (Kilowatt) as defined in Articles 4 and 5 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2930/8635; with regard to certain types of fishing activity, the Council may define capacity, on the basis of, for example, the number and size of the vessel's fishing gears;
Amendment 946 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 20
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 20
– 'aquaculture' means the rearing or cultivation of aquatic organisms using techniques designed to increase the production of the organisms in question beyond the natural capacity of the environment, where the organisms remain the property of a natural or legal person throughout the rearing and culture stage, up to and including harvestin inland or coastal areas, which involves, firstly, intervention in the rearing process to improve production and, secondly, individual or company ownership of the stock cultivated (mussels designation of origing);
Amendment 950 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 21
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 21
– 'fishing licence' means a licence as referred to in Article 4(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009n official document which authorises the holder, in accordance with national legislation, to use a certain fishing capacity for commercial fishing of living aquatic resources, and which stipulates the minimum requirements concerning identification, technical characteristics and equipment of a Community fishing vessel;
Amendment 952 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 22
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 22
– 'fishing authorisation' means an authorisation as referred to in Article 4(10) of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009to fish issued to a Community fishing vessel, as well as a fishing licence, which authorises the vessel to carry out specific fishing activities within a certain period, in a certain area or for a certain fishery, under specific conditions;
Amendment 954 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 23
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 23
– 'fishing' means the collection or capture of aquatic organisms living in their natural environment, or the intentional use of any means allowing such collection or capture activity' means searching for fish, shooting, setting, towing or hauling of fishing gear, taking catch on board, transhipping, retaining on board, processing on board, transferring, caging, fattening and landing of fish and fisheries products;
Amendment 962 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 27
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 27
– 'end-user of scientific data' means a body with a research or management interest in the scientific analysis of data in the fisheries sector;
Amendment 967 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 28
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 28
– 'surplus of allowable catch' means that part of the allowable catch which a coastal State does not have the capacity to harvestfish;
Amendment 972 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 30
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 30
– 'spawning stock biomass' means an estimate of the mass of the fish of a particular resource that reproduces at a defined time, including both males and females and including fish that reproduce viviparously;
Amendment 977 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31
– 'Mmixed fisheries' means fisheries where in which more than one species are present in the area being fished and are vulnerable to beinga given area and may be caught in the fishing gear.same catch;
Amendment 981 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31 a (new)
Part 1 – Article 5 – paragraph 1 – indent 31 a (new)
– 'coastal and small-scale fishing' means professional fishing activity deeply rooted in a local community and carried out in maritime areas near to the coast, which is highly-selective, conducted during short fishing trips, with daily returns to port, and characterised by the freshness of its products and its respect for the environment and the small-scale tradition. This type of fishing shows a high level of socioeconomic dependence on ports and is operated by a microbusiness or family business, both in terms of ownership and actual fishing. This definition includes shellfish gathering and the fishing of certain species on foot;
Amendment 1048 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) adopting multiannual plans under Articles 9 - 11, and the corresponding establishment of objectives for the sustainable exploitation of stocks, under Articles 9 - 11, and measures concerning the obligation to land all catches, in accordance with Article 15;
Amendment 1051 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1082 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) fixing fishing opportunities as defined in Article 16;
Amendment 1085 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point g
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point g
Amendment 1102 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 3 – Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 1124 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
Part 3 – Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) prohibirestrictions ofn the use of certain fishing gears in certain areas or seasons;
Amendment 1140 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
Part 3 – article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) requirements for fishing vessels to cease operating in an area for a defined minimum period in order to protect a temporary aggregation of a vulnerable marine resource, endangered or spawning species or juveniles;
Amendment 1160 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Multiannual plans providing for technical conservation measures to maintain or restore fish stocks aboveclose to levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield shall be established as a priority., or which keep them, where possible, within biologically safe levels bearing in mind the social and economic aspects of each fishery, while also enabling the agreed long-term economic objectives to be met, shall be established as a priority. Technical measures may include the following:
Amendment 1172 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) mesh sizes and rules concerning the use of fishing gears;
Amendment 1173 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
(b) restrictions on the construction of fishing gear, including (i) modifications or additional devices to improve selectivity or to reduce impact on the benthic zone; (ii) modifications or additional devices to reduce the incidental capture of endangered, threatened and protected species;
Amendment 1174 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)
(c) prohibition of the use of certain fishing gears in certain areas or seasons;
Amendment 1175 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d (new)
(d) prohibition or restriction of fishing activities in certain zones and/or periods;
Amendment 1176 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e (new)
(e) requirements for fishing vessels to cease operating in an area for a defined minimum period in order to protect a temporary aggregation of a vulnerable marine resource, endangered or spawning species or juveniles;
Amendment 1177 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f (new)
(f) specific measures to reduce the impact of fishing activities on marine eco-systems and non target species;
Amendment 1178 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g (new)
Amendment 1204 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Any measures adopted must be based on scientific and socioeconomic reports drawn up for that purpose by the STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries).
Amendment 1205 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 3
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Multiannual plans shall, where possible, cover either fisheries exploiting single fish stocks or, in the case of mixed fisheries, those exploiting a mixture of stocks, taking due account of interactions between stocks and fisheriesin line with the objectives established in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment 1212 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4
4. Multiannual plans shall be based on the precautionary approach to fisheries management and shall take into account the limitations of the available data and assessment methods and all quantified sources of uncertainty in a scientifically valid manner.
Amendment 1222 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The application and design of multiannual plans shall include the proposal of measures based on economic wisdom, taking into account the need to gradually introduce relevant changes and avoiding the imposition of unnecessarily short time frames in non-urgent situations, which should be based on objective reasoning and also be acceptable in socioeconomic terms. At the same time, a socioeconomic impact study shall be carried out, with the participation of the actors concerned.
Amendment 1232 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Multiannual plans should set clear objectives, time frames for reaching them, trajectories and periodic checks. Both the time frame and the trajectory should be tailored to the dynamics of the species involved. A two-speed trajectory may be used, involving swifter action to restore the stock to within biological limits and a slower lane from which to address socioeconomic objectives once the risk to recruitment owing to lack of breeding stock has been averted.
Amendment 1238 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 c (new)
Part 3 – article 9 – paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. The Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) shall advise Parliament and the Council on the adoption of multiannual plans.
Amendment 1245 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 1
1. MIn line with the provisions of Article 2 of this Regulation, multiannual plans shall provide for adaptations of the fishing mortality rate which, while ensuring the socioeconomic sustainability of the sector, resulting in a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains all stocks aboveround levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield by 2015or that keeps them within biologically safe limits by 2015, where possible.
Amendment 1268 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 2
Part 3 – article 10 – paragraph 2
2. In cases where the determination of a fishing mortality rate that restores and maintains stocks aboveround levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield and enabling the sector to become socioeconomically sustainable is not possible, multiannual plans shall provide for precautionary measures ensuring a comparable biologically safe degree of conservation of the relevant stocks.
Amendment 1303 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) clear time frames to reach the quantifiable targets; including a socioeconomic impact assessment of the various alternatives and time frames presented in such plans and possible short-term losses for the actors involved, in both the fishing and processing industries;
Amendment 1309 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) Any measures adopted must be based on scientific and socioeconomic reports drawn up for that purpose by the STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries).
Amendment 1315 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) technical measures including measures concerning the eliminagradual reduction of unwanted catches;
Amendment 1335 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) quantifiable indicators for periodic monitoring and assessment of the progress related to achieving the targets of the multiannual plan and its possible socio- economic consequences;
Amendment 1346 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) minimisation of unwanted impacts of fishing on the eco-system;
Amendment 1351 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point i
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point i
Amendment 1366 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) any other measures suitablesuitable and proportionate measures to achieve the objectives of multiannual plans.
Amendment 1370 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
Part 3 – article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) measures to mitigate the social and economic consequences within its scope of application.
Amendment 1394 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 2
Part 3 – article 12 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55, to specify fishing related measures to alleviate the impact of fishing activities in special areas of conservation, after receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs), the Council and the European Parliament.
Amendment 1400 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 1
Amendment 1415 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 2
Part 3 – article 13 – paragraph 2
Amendment 1427 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – title
Part 3 – article 14 – title
Technical measures frameworks provided for in multiannual plans
Amendment 1428 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Amendment 1438 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) contribute to maintaining or restoring fish stocks above levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yit biologically safe levelds through improvements in size-selection and where appropriate species selection;
Amendment 1457 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) mitigate the impacts of fishing gear on the ecosystem and the environment, with particular regard to the protection of biologically sensitive stocks and habitats.
Amendment 1462 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) establish the minimum conservation sizes referred to in Article 15(2).
Amendment 1465 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 d b (new)
Part 3 – article 14 – paragraph 1 d b (new)
(db) take account of the socio-economic repercussions of the adoption of such measures.
Amendment 1480 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. All catches of the following fish stocks subject to catch limits caught during fishing activities in Union waters or by Union fishing vessels outside Union waters shall be brought and retained on board the fishing vessels and recorded and landed, except when used as live bait, , in accordance with the following timeframe:principle of proportionality and adopting a gradual, fishery-by-fishery approach, with a timeframe for implementation of not less than 10 years. The introduction of this measure, following an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs), will require a clear and detailed study by the Commission on its impact on employment and fishing enterprises in the EU. The Commission shall also state what mechanisms will be used to calculate discards, whether there will be an increase in fishing quotas, and the way in which the measure will be implemented in the case of mixed fisheries.
Amendment 1492 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a
Amendment 1494 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 1
Amendment 1499 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2
Amendment 1507 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
Amendment 1514 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
Amendment 1538 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2
2. Minimum conservation reference sizes based on the best available scientific advice shall be established for the fish stocks set out in paragraph 1. The sale of catches of such fish stocks below the minimum conservation reference size shall be restricted for reduction to fish meal or pet food only.
Amendment 1554 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the case of fishing vessels flying the flag of an EU Member State and operating outside EU waters, the obligation to retain on board and land all catches shall be subject to the applicable provisions of the RFOs or corresponding bilateral fisheries agreements. Where no such rules exist, the Council and European Parliament may adopt, on a case by case basis, the rules they consider to be necessary to ensuring that the EU fleet is not at a competitive disadvantage to other fleets working in the same area.
Amendment 1556 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 3
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 3
Amendment 1565 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 4
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that Union fishing vessels flying their flags are equipped to ensure full documentation of all fishing and processing activities, in accordance with the Fisheries Control Regulation, for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the obligation tos on landing all catches.
Amendment 1590 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 6
Part 3 – article 15 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55After receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Committees (RACs) and in accordance with Article 55, the Council and the European Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts to specify the measures set out in paragraph 1 for the purpose of complying with the Union's international obligations.
Amendment 1596 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Fishing opportunities allocated to Member States shall ensure each Member State relative stability, based on the previous five years of fishing activities, for each fish stock or fishery. The interestsdependency of each Member State on fishing activities, and fishing losses in each area, shall be taken into account when new fishing opportunities are allocated.
Amendment 1606 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 2
2. By-catch fishing opportunities may be reserved under the total fishing opportunities, following assessment of the impact of this measure in the various Community fisheries.
Amendment 1623 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may, after notifying the Commission, exchange all or part of the fishing opportunities allocated to them, with the reserves provided for in paragraph 2 being respected.
Amendment 1626 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Part 3 – article 16 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Amendment 1634 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 17 – paragraph 1
1. In a multiannual plan established pursuant to Articles 9, 10 and 11 Member States, the Council and European Parliament may be authorised Member States to adopt measures, in accordance with that multiannual plan, which specify the conservation measures applicable to vessels flying their flag in relation to stocks in Union waters for which they have been allocated fishing opportunities and to all vessels fishing within the territorial waters of the Member State, and which may not discriminate against the fleets of other Member States.
Amendment 1686 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 18 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 18 – paragraph 1
After receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs), the Member States adopting conservation measures pursuant to Article 17(1) shall notify the Commission, the European Parliament and other interested Member States and relevant Advisory Councils of such measures.
Amendment 1706 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 20 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 20 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be empoweredAfter receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) the Council and the European Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 to specify the conservation measures for fisheries covered by a multiannual plan, if the Member States authorised to take measures in accordance with Article 17 do not notify such measures to the Commission within three months after the date of entry into force of the multiannual plan.
Amendment 1715 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Part 3 – article 20 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The Commission shall be empoweredAfter receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) the Council and the European Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 to specify conservation measures for fisheries covered by a multiannual plan, if
Amendment 1751 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 22 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 22 – paragraph 1
Member States adopting technical measures pursuant to Article 21 shall notify the Commission, other interested Member States and relevant Advisory Councils of such measures, even where they will apply only to vessels flying the flag of the adopting Member State.
Amendment 1764 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 3 – article 24 – paragraph 1
Part 3 – article 24 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be empoweredAfter receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs) the Council and the European Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 to specify the technical measures covered by a technical measures framework, if the Member States authorised to take measures in accordance with Article 21 do not notify such measures to the Commission within three months after the date of entry into force of the technical measures framework.
Amendment 1825 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) all fishing vessels of 12 meters length over all or more; andnot covered by the definition of small-scale fishing fleet set out in Article 5 of this Regulation;
Amendment 1836 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 4 – article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) all fishing vessels under 12 meters l system of registers shall be established under which quotas may be transferred only betweeng th overall fishing with towed geare vessels on a given register, so as to place a limit on the accumulation of fishing rights.
Amendment 1870 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 3
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 3
3. For the allocation of transferable fishing concessions pertaining to mixed fisheries, Member States shall take account of the likely catch composition of vessels participating in such fisheries, which shall be established by the STECF (Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries) with the assistance of the fishing industry, as represented by the Regional Advisory Councils (RACs).
Amendment 1874 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 4
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 4
Amendment 1882 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 5
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 5
5. Member States may limit the period of validity of transferable fishing concessions to a period of at least 1530 years, for the purpose of reallocating such concessions. Where Member States have not limited the period of validity of the transferable fishing concessions, they may recall such concessions with a notice of at least 1530 years.
Amendment 1891 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 6
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 6
Amendment 1902 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 7
Part 4 – article 28 – paragraph 7
7. Notwithstanding paragraph 5 and 6, Member States may recall transferable fishing concessions that have not been used on a fishing vessel for a period of three consecutive years, or five years in duly justified cases. The transfer of fishing opportunities to one or more other vessels shall be dealt with in the same way as the use of those opportunities.
Amendment 1915 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 1
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall allocate individual fishing opportunities to holders of transferable fishing concessions, on the basis of the quotas granted by the Council, as referred to in Article 28, on the basis of fishing opportunities allocated to the Member States, or established in management plans adopted by Member States in accordance with Article 19 of Regulation (EC) No 1967/2006. Consequently, this system shall not apply to the remaining species and areas not covered by these obligations, and the present principle of relative stability shall be revised accordingly.
Amendment 1922 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 2
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 2
Amendment 1928 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 3
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Fishing vessels shall undertake fishing activities only when in possession of sufficient individual fishing opportunities to cover all their potential catch. However, in accordance with the principle of relative stability, those vessels whose fishing capacity is reduced as a consequence of this obligation shall be provided with fishing alternatives.
Amendment 1935 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4
4. Member States may reserve up to 5% of fishing opportunities in accordance with criteria that justify this action and that they shall establish in their own legislation. They shall establish objectives and transparent criteria for the allocation of such reserved fishing opportunities. Those fishing opportunities may only be allocated to eligible holders of transferable fishing concessions as set out in Article 28(4), (in possible contradiction with Articles 16(4) and 28(2)).
Amendment 1940 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The distribution of individual fishing concessions shall take account of the vessels' history in the fishery and the socio-economic aspects.
Amendment 1941 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 5
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 5
5. When allocating transferable fishing concessions in accordance with Article 28 and when allocating fishing opportunities in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article, a Member State may provide incentives to fishing vessels deploying selective fishing gear that eliminates unwanted by-catch within the fishing opportunities assigned to that Member State. During a five-year period, these measures shall be compatible with aid for the temporary laying-up of vessels.
Amendment 1947 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 6
Part 4 – article 29 – paragraph 6
Amendment 1979 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 2
Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 2
2. AThe Member State mays shall authorise transfer of transferable fishing concessions to and from other Member States.
Amendment 1988 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Part 4 – article 31 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Before 31 December 2017, the Commission shall inform the Council and the European Parliament on the systems of transferable fishing concessions set up by each Member State for the high seas fleet and their contribution to the improved achievement of the objectives of the Common Fisheries Policy, with a view to establishing a Community system of fishing concessions and, possibly, the creation of a single market.
Amendment 2005 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2
Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. AThe Member State mays shall authorise the leasing of individual fishing opportunities to and from other Member States.
Amendment 2007 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Part 4 – Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. In the interests of making efficient use of each Member State’s fishing opportunities, the existence of cross- border producer groups should be taken into account.
Amendment 2014 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 4 – Article 33 – paragraph 1
Part 4 – Article 33 – paragraph 1
Amendment 2073 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 2
Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. Member States may request the Commission to exclude all fishing vessels, whether subject to a system of transferable fishing concessions established in accordance with Article 27 or not, from the fishing capacity ceilings established in accordance with paragraph 1. In that case the fishing capacity ceilings shall be re- calculated to take into account the fishing vessels which are not subject to a system of transferable fishing concessions.
Amendment 2076 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 3
Part 5 – Article 35 – paragraph 3
Amendment 2090 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 5 – Article 36 – paragraph 4
Part 5 – Article 36 – paragraph 4
4. The information contained in the Union fishing fleet register shall be made available to all Member States. The Commission shall be empowereduncil and Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning the definition of the information referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 2100 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall collect biological, technical, environmental and socio- economic data necessary for ecosystem based fisheries and aquaculture management, manage them and make them available to end users of scientific data and the public, including bodies designated by the Commission. Those data shall in particular enable the assessment of:
Amendment 2129 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 3
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure the national coordination of the collection and management of scientific and socio- economic data for fisheries management. To this end, they shall designate a national correspondent and organizse an annual national coordination meeting. The Commission shall be informed of the national coordination activities and be invited to the coordination meetings.
Amendment 2136 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 4
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall coordinate, via the Commission, their data collection activities with other Member States in the same region, and make every effort to coordinate their actions with third countries having sovereignty or jurisdiction over waters in the same region.
Amendment 2140 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 5
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 5
5. The collection, management and use of data shall be done in the framework of a multi-annual programme as of 2014, which shall explicitly recognise the implementing protocol, underpinned by a close relationship between the fisheries authorities, scientists and each fisheries sector concerned. Such a multi-annual programme shall include targets for the precision of the data to be collected, and aggregation levels for the collection, management and use of such data.
Amendment 2144 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 6
Part 6 – Article 37 – paragraph 6
6. The Commission shall be empowereduncil and Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55, to specify the targets for the precision of the data to be collected and to define the aggregation levels for the collection, management and use of such data, for the multi-annual programme referred to in paragraph 5.
Amendment 2150 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 6 – Article 38 – paragraph 1
Part 6 – Article 38 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall adopt national fisheries scientific data collection, research and innovation programs. They shall coordinate, via the Commission, their fisheries data collection, research (both basic and applied) and innovation activities with other Member States and Union research and innovation frameworks.
Amendment 2167 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 1
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 1
1. The Union shall participate in the activities of international organisations dealing with fisheries, in coordination with the Advisory Committee on fisheries and aquaculture, including regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) in line with international obligations and policy objectives and consistent with the objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3, and with other areas of EU policy, particularly development cooperation and economic, financial and technical cooperation with third countries, as enshrined in Article 197 of the TFEU and in agreements signed with third countries.
Amendment 2171 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Union shall contribute to the strengthening of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), thus providing greater protection to EU vessels which, and EU citizens who, may be harmed by third countries, in breach of this convention and of other international treaties signed by the EU.
Amendment 2175 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 2
Part 7 – Article 39 – paragraph 2
2. The positions of the Union in international organisations dealing with fisheries and RFMOs shall be based on the best available scientific advice to ensure that fishery resources are maintained above or restored above, whenever possible, at around levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield.
Amendment 2192 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 40 – paragraph 1
Part 7 – Article 40 – paragraph 1
The Union shall cooperate with third countries and international organisations dealing with fisheries, including RFMOs, to strengthen compliance with measures, including those on safety at sea, adopted by such international organisations. The EU shall draw on the best available scientific advice in order to achieve and maintain MSY levels, for which reason it shall actively support the development of scientific knowledge within RFMOs and international bodies in collaboration with third countries and the RFMOs themselves. Agreements on reciprocal access shall contain a clause prohibiting discrimination in any form whatsoever between EU investors and nationals of another country.
Amendment 2197 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 1
Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 1
1. Sustainable Fisheries Agreements with third countries shall establish a legal, economic and environmental governance framework for bilateral fishing activities carried out by Union fishing vessels in third country waters. and, where applicable, by third country vessels in European Union waters, in view of the interests of the EU fleet and the supply requirements of the Union market.
Amendment 2208 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2
Part 7 – Article 41 – paragraph 2
2. Union fishing vessels shall only catch surplus of the allowable catch determined by the third country as referred to in Article 62(2) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, and identified on the basis of the best available scientific advice and relevant information exchanged between the Union and the third country concerned about the total fishing effort on the affected stocks, in order to ensure that fishery resources remain abovet around levels capable of producing maximum sustainable yield. There shall be an agreement between the parties setting out the quantities involved and the period of validity of the surplus catch such that the terms thereof are fully transparent and an environment may be created that is conducive to private investment and the development of a dynamic, viable and competitive private sector.
Amendment 2240 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) establish the governance framework, including accordance with Article 4 of this Regulation, which shall include the development and maintenance of the necessary scientific and research institutions, monitoring, control and surveillance capability and other capacity building items pertaining to the development of a sustainable fisheries policy driven by the third country. Such financial assistance shall be conditioned upon the achievement of specific socio- economic and environmental results.
Amendment 2245 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Part 7 – Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The EU shall establish, in the context of these Agreements, the fishing opportunities that may be exchanged with third countries bearing in mind the needs of their vessels.
Amendment 2285 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) assuring the availability of supplies;
Amendment 2293 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new)
(db) ensuring supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices;
Amendment 2323 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point b
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) certainty for aquaculture operators in relation to access to waters and space throughout the Union, with the exception of those referred to in paragraph 4a;
Amendment 2342 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Part 8 – Article 43 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. New growing areas, preferably offshore, shall be set aside for the development of industrial intensive aquaculture, turning the areas currently employed for mollusc production and their protective perimeter belt over to traditional extensive growing methods. The establishment of areas reserved for extensive aquaculture and traditional small-scale fishing shall help to ensure the continued availability in the Union of locally produced, quality seafood noted for its diversity and sustainability.
Amendment 2346 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 8 – Article 44 – paragraph 1
Part 8 – Article 44 – paragraph 1
An Advisory Council on aquaculture shall be established in accordance with Article 53, in conjunction with the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture (ACFA).
Amendment 2356 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point c
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) strengthen the competitiveness of the Union fishery and aquaculture industry, in particular producers, by inter alia promoting quality schemes for agri-food products, for which purpose bodies managing the aforementioned quality schemes shall be granted special consideration;
Amendment 2365 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) contribute to ensuring a level playing field for all products marketed in the Union by promoting sustainable exploitation of fisheries resourcescommercial conditions for all products produced, processed and marketed in the Union, in keeping and in line with the common trade policy and agri-food quality schemes, by promoting sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources that complies with the Union’s health and social requirements; and this without prejudice to ensuring a level-playing field for all products marketed in the Union.
Amendment 2371 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) ensure that consumers have a diverse supply of fishery and aquaculture products, the quality and origin of which are certified, and with sufficient information so that their decisions contribute to the achievement of the objectives established in this Regulation.
Amendment 2385 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
Part 9 – Article 45 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(ba) consumer information.
Amendment 2394 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) the use of moderneffective control technologies for the availability and quality of data on fisheries;
Amendment 2407 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point e
Part 10 – Article 46 – paragraph 2 – point e
(e) the establishment of effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions that are the same in all Member States.
Amendment 2424 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 10 – Article 48 – paragraph 1
Part 10 – Article 48 – paragraph 1
Amendment 2431 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 11 – Article 49 – paragraph 1
Part 11 – Article 49 – paragraph 1
Union financial assistance may be granted to contribute to the achievement of the long-term environmental, economic and social sustainability objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment 2445 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 1
Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. Union financial assistance towards operators shall be conditional upon compliance with the objectives and rules of the Common Fisheries Policy by operators.
Amendment 2448 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 2
Part 11 – Article 51 – paragraph 2
2. Serious infringements by operators of the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy shall result in temporary or permanent bans on access to the Union financial assistance and/or the application of financial reductions. Such measures, implemented by the Member State, shall be proportionate to the nature, extent, duration and repetition of serious infringements.
Amendment 2457 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 52 – paragraph 1
Part 12 – Article 52 – paragraph 1
1. Advisory Councils are established for each of the areas of competence set out in Annex III, to promote a balanced representation of all stakeholders, in accordance with Article 54(1), and to contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in Articles 2 and 3.
Amendment 2461 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – article 52 – paragraph 2
Part 12 – article 52 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall be empowereduncil and Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning amendments to that Annex to change the areas of competence, to create new areas of competence for Advisory Councils or to create new Advisory Councils.
Amendment 2471 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) submit recommendations and suggestions on socio-economic matters relating to fisheries management and aquaculture to the Commission, Parliament or to the Member State concerned;.
Amendment 2480 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point b
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) inform the Commission, Parliament and Member States of problems relating to fisheries management and aquaculture in their area of competence, and, more generally, on the measures set out in Titles II and III of this regulation;
Amendment 2492 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 2
Part 12 – Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission, Parliament and, where relevant, the Member State concerned, shall reply within a reasonable time periodtwo months to any recommendation, suggestion or information received pursuant to paragraph 1.
Amendment 2501 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 1
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 1
1. Advisory Councils shall be composed of the Member States’ fisheries authorities, organizsations representing the fisheries operators, the scientific community and other interest groups affected by the Common Fisheries Policy.
Amendment 2514 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 2
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 2
2. Each Advisory Council shall consist of a general assembly and an executive committee and shall adopt the measures necessary for its organizsation and to ensure transparency in procedures and the respect of all opinions expressed.
Amendment 2520 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 4
Part 12 – Article 54 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall be empowereduncil and Parliament may empower the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 55 concerning the composition and the functioning of Advisory Councils.
Amendment 2526 #
2011/0195(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 1
Part 13 – Article 55 – paragraph 1
1. The power to adopt delegated acts isAfter receiving an opinion from the Regional Advisory Committees (RACs), the Council and Parliament shall be empowered to conferred on the Commission the power to adopt delegated acts, subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
Amendment 1 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) the date of catch of fishery products or date of harvest of aquaculture products;
Amendment 74 #
Amendment 79 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
The Common Market Organisation shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives laid down in Articles 2 and 3 of the Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy and, in particular to improving market incentives to support sustainable production practices, the market position of EU production, producers’ market strategies to adapt EU production to structural market changes and short term fluctuations and to enhance the market potential of EU products.
Amendment 84 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The Common Market Organisation shall be guided by the principles of good governance laid down in Article 4 of the Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy, clearly defining responsibilities at the Union, national, regional and local levels, with a long-term perspective, the broad involvement of stakeholders, the responsibility of the flag State, and consistency with the integrated maritime policy, the trade policy and other Union policies.
Amendment 92 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
fa) ‘operator’, means the natural or legal person who operates or holds any enterprise carrying out any of the activities related to any stage of production, processing, marketing, distribution and sale of fisheries and aquaculture products;
Amendment 93 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
fb) ‘unwanted catches’
Amendment 95 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
For the purposes of setting up fishery producer organisations, the specific situation of small-scale inshore fishery and non-industrial fishery producers will need to be taken into account, and they should benefit from positive discrimination as regards access to aid for the establishment of producer organisations.
Amendment 104 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
aa) contributing to food supply and employment in coastal and rural areas;
Amendment 109 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) handling unwanted catches of commercial stocks in accordance with the production and marketing plans laid down in Article 32;
Amendment 114 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
ba) contributing to the elimination of illegal, unregistered and undeclared (IUU) fishing;
Amendment 122 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
ea) promoting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of fisheries;
Amendment 129 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
eb) facilitating consumer access to information on fisheries products, which should be clear and comprehensive.
Amendment 134 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Fishery producer organisations may make use, inter alia, of the following measures to achieve the objectives set out in Article 7:
Amendment 137 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) planning the management of the fishing activities of their members;
Amendment 140 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
aa) advise the Member States and regional authorities on matters relating to fisheries management;
Amendment 160 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 3
– distributing landed products free of charge to philanthropic or charitable purposes.
Amendment 164 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
fa) improving quality, knowledge of and the transparency of production and the market, performing research studies and promoting Union fishery products;
Amendment 170 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new)
fb) supporting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of fisheries;
Amendment 172 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f c (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f c (new)
fc) promoting consumer access to information on fisheries products, which should be clear and comprehensive;
Amendment 174 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f d (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f d (new)
fd) sending information voluntarily to the competent national authorities on the conservation status of marine ecosystems and fishery resources at such intervals and by such means as might be considered appropriate;
Amendment 175 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f e (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f e (new)
fe) granting floor-rate financial compensation to help meet the costs of landing unwanted catches in cases where the proceeds of sales would be insufficient to cover those costs;
Amendment 176 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f f (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point f f (new)
ff) granting floor-rate financial compensation to help meet the costs of biological rest periods, at given critical phases of species’ life cycles, in order to conserve fishery resources and hence ensure that stocks will be such as to allow fishing to continue outside rest periods.
Amendment 177 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 8 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 180 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) promoting economically, socially and environmentally sustainable aquaculture activities of their members, by providing opportunities for their development in close cooperation with the Member States and regional authorities;
Amendment 188 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) contributing to food supply and, observing high food quality and safety standards, and to employment in coastal and rural areas;
Amendment 191 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
da) stabilising the markets;
Amendment 198 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
eb) promoting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of aquaculture;
Amendment 199 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
ec) facilitating consumer access to information on aquaculture products;
Amendment 203 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Aquaculture producer organisations may make use, inter alia, of the following measures to achieve the objectives referred to in Article 10:
Amendment 206 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
aa) planning the management of the aquaculture activities of their members;
Amendment 207 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) channelling the supply, price stabilisation and the marketing of members' products;
Amendment 208 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
ca) managing temporary storage for aquaculture products in conformity with Articles 35 and 36.
Amendment 211 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
ea) ) improving quality, knowledge of and the transparency of production and the market, performing research studies and promoting Union aquaculture products;
Amendment 213 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new)
eb) supporting vocational training and cooperation programmes in the field of aquaculture;
Amendment 214 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point e c (new)
ec) promoting consumer access to information on aquaculture products, which should be clear and comprehensive;
Amendment 216 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11 a (new)
Article 11a Operators’ Organisations Establishment of operators’ organisations Operators’ organisations may be established as groups set up on the own initiative of marketing bodies and processors of fishery and aquaculture products in one or more Member States.
Amendment 217 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 b (new)
Article 11 b (new)
Article 11b Objectives of Operators’ Organisations Operators’ organisations shall pursue the following objectives: a) improving the conditions for the placing on the market of fishery and aquaculture products; b) stabilising markets.
Amendment 218 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 c (new)
Article 11 c (new)
Article 11c Measures deployable by operators’ organisations a) adjusting production to market requirements; b) channelling the supply and the marketing of their members’ products; c) controlling and taking measures to ensure their members' activities comply with the rules established by the operators’ organisation.
Amendment 228 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
ga) providing training on quality and traceability.
Amendment 231 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16 a (new)
Article 16a Management bodies for protected designations of origin Management bodies for protected designations of origin, established under the regulations in each Member State, may bring their objectives, measures, powers and the rights that are naturally theirs into line with those granted to professional organisations governed by this Regulation.
Amendment 235 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) they are sufficiently active economically in their territory or a part thereof, in particular as regards number of members andor volume of marketable production;, where sufficiently active shall mean a figure of 35 % for producer membership and 25 % for production.
Amendment 251 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Member States shall carry out checks at regular intervals to ascertain whether producer organisations, associations of producer organisations and inter-branch organisations comply with the conditions for recognition laid down in Articles 17 and 18 and shall, where appropriate, withdraw recognition of producer organisations, associations of producer organisations or inter-branch organisations.
Amendment 252 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Member States whose nationals are members of a producer organisation, association of producer organisations or inter-branch organisation established in the territory of another Member State and those Member States hosting the official headquarters of an association of producer organisations recognised in different Member States shall set up, in collaboration with the relevant Member States, the administrative cooperation needed to carry out checks on the activities of the organisation or the association concerned.
Amendment 255 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – title
Article 22 – title
Communication to the Commission and publication of the list of producer organisations
Amendment 257 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Article 22 – paragraph 1
Amendment 259 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Article 23 – paragraph 1
In order to ensure that the conditions for recognition of producer organisations, operator organisations, associations of producer organisations or inter-branch organisations laid down in Articles 17 and 18 are complied with, the Commission may carry out checks and may, where appropriate, request that Member States withdraw the recognition of producer organisations or inter-branch, associations of producer organisations or organisations.
Amendment 266 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – title
Article 26 – title
Extension of rules of producer organisations and associations of producer organisations
Amendment 267 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. A Member State may make the rules agreed within a producer organisation or association of producer organisations binding on producers who are not members of the organisation or association and who market any of the products within the area in which the producer organisation or association of producer organisations is representative on condition that:
Amendment 268 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the producer organisation or association of producer organisations is considered to be representative of production and marketing in one Member State and makes an application to the competent national authorities;
Amendment 271 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) the rules to be extended concern any of the measures for producer organisations or associations of producer organisations laid down in Article 8(a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and Article 11.
Amendment 277 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 2
Article 26 – paragraph 2
2. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a) a fishery producer organisation or association of producer organisations is deemed representative where it accounts for at least 65 % of the quantities marketed of the relevant product during the previous year in the area where it is proposed to extend the rules.
Amendment 284 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 3
Article 26 – paragraph 3
3. For the purposes of paragraph 1(a) an aquaculture producer organisation or association of producer organisations is considered to be representative where it covers at least 4065 % of the quantities marketed of the relevant product during the previous year in the area where it is proposed to extend the rules.
Amendment 286 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 4
Article 26 – paragraph 4
4. The rules to be extended to non- members shall apply for a period between 90 days and 12 monthof no more than three years.
Amendment 288 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 1
Article 29 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall notify the Commission of the rules which they intenddecide to make binding on all producers or operators in a specific area or in specific areas pursuant to Articles 26 and 27.
Amendment 289 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 3
Article 29 – paragraph 3
3. Within twoone months of receipt of the notification, the Commission shall take a decision authorising or refusing to authorise the extension of rules and shall inform the Member States. Where the Commission has not taken a decision within the twoone-month period, the extension of rules shall be deemed to have been authorised by the Commission.
Amendment 295 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 1
Article 32 – paragraph 1
1. Each producer organisation shall submit a production and marketing plan to their competent national authorities to fulfil the objectives laid down in Article 3. Plans may take biological rest periods into account.
Amendment 300 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 2
Article 32 – paragraph 2
2. The Member States shall approve the plan and inform the Commission thereof. Once approved, the producer organisation shall immediately implement the plan.
Amendment 308 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Producer organisations may fully or partly finance the storage of fishery products listed in Annex II to this Regulation, along with other products to be determined by the Member States, provided that:
Amendment 313 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
da) the minimum and maximum period shall be clearly laid down.
Amendment 314 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 35 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Aquaculture producer organisations may temporarily finance the holding of live stock in aquaculture facilities, provided that: a) at the time the fish stock is slaughtered no buyer has been found for them at the trigger price referred to in Article 36; b) the products meet the marketing standards adopted under Article 39 and are of suitable quality for human consumption; c) the live aquaculture stock is being held in order to reintroduce it onto the market for human consumption at a later stage.
Amendment 315 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 – paragraph 1
Article 36 – paragraph 1
1. Before the beginning of each year, each producer organisation may individually make a proposal for a price triggering the storage mechanism referred to in Article 35 for fishery products listed in Annex II, as well as for aquaculture products.
Amendment 326 #
Amendment 329 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph -1
Article 38 – paragraph -1
-1. The creation, restructuring and implementation of plans to improve the standards of producer organisations and their associations may be fully or partly funded through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund.
Amendment 332 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Each producer organisation may create a collective fund, which shall be used onprincipally to finance the following measures:
Amendment 333 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new)
The instruments that make up the CMO, including the Fisheries Fund, shall be funded through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, without prejudice to the co-financing rates set.
Amendment 339 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a
a) minimum marketing sizes taking into account the best available scientific advice and in conformity with conservation reference sizes for fishery products as referred to in Article 15(32) of the Regulation on the Common Fisheries Policy;
Amendment 343 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
aa) the minimum degree of freshness of unprocessed fish;
Amendment 344 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
ba) specifications applicable to products from unwanted catches, below the minimum size or over the set quota.
Amendment 349 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 3 a (new)
Article 39 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. In order to improve first sale prices for fish, so as to benefit producers, and to make for fair and proper distribution of added value over the whole of the value chain, whenever serious problems are noted in terms of producers’ incomes and imbalances along the value chain.
Amendment 357 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 40 – paragraph 3
Article 40 – paragraph 3
3. All fishery products landed, including those not complying with marketing standards, may be, under the responsibility of the Member States, distributed free of charge to philanthropic or charitable institutions established in the Union or to persons who are recognised by the legislation of the Member State concerned as being entitled to public assistance.
Amendment 363 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1
Article 41 – paragraph 1
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 50, in order to definesupplement or enlarge upon the common marketing standards referred to in Article 39(1) with regard to quality, size or weight, packing, presentation and labelling, and, if experience gained in the implementation of the standards so requires, to amend them, while ensuring that the standards are defined in a fair and transparent manner;.
Amendment 376 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point c
c) the area where the product was caught or farmed;, including its coastal and geographical denomination, expressed in terms understandable to consumers
Amendment 385 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 42 – paragraph 1 – point e
e) whether the product is freshozen or has been defrosted; for sale to consumers, pursuant to annex VI of Regulation 1169/2011.
Amendment 399 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
Article 42 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new)
ca) Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs.
Amendment 401 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 a (new)
Article 42 a (new)
Article 42a Labelling initiative Following prior consultation with the interested parties, the Commission shall, by 1 July 2014, submit a report to the European Parliament , together with the appropriate legislative proposals, on the establishment of a labelling system for fishery and aquaculture products, which shall comprise: a) an ecological labelling system for sustainable fishing within maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and for traditional aquaculture products. b) a Union label for all fishery and aquaculture products obtained by means of practices which comply with relevant Union rules.
Amendment 408 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) the scientific name for each species according to the FishBase Information System, for fish species, and the SeaLifeBase or WoRMS systems for other species;
Amendment 417 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) in the case of fishery products caught at sea, the name of one of the areas, subareas or divisions listed in the FAO Fishing Areas, including its coastal and geographical denomination, expressed in terms understandable to consumers;
Amendment 423 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 2
Article 44 – paragraph 2
2. In addition to the information referred to in paragraph 1, operators may indicate a more precise catch or production area, without prejudice to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006.
Amendment 430 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
ea) information on the port at which the product was landed.
Amendment 432 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. No voluntary information shall be included that cannot be checked.
Amendment 437 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point a
a) supplement or amendenlarge upon the mandatory information requirements referred to in Article 42(1), Article 42(2), Article 43 and Article 44, while ensuring that the mandatory information is performrovided in an accurate and transparent manner;
Amendment 440 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) setpecify minimum criteria for information voluntarily provided by operators referred to in Article 45(1), while ensuring that the conditions for displaying voluntary information are accurate, transparent and non-discriminatory.
Amendment 443 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 49 – paragraph 1 – point b
b) survey prices regularly along the Union supply chain for fishery and aquaculture products and conduct analyses on market trends, and make the findings of those surveys and analyses public;
Amendment 461 #
2011/0194(COD)
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – New entries to be inserted/added
Annex I – New entries to be inserted/added
fishmeal, tuna intended for processing, aquaculture species listed in Annex V of Regulation 104/2000, the species Sprattus sprattus and Coryphaena hippurus, listed in Annex IV of Regulation 104/2000