4 Amendments of Petri SARVAMAA related to 2016/2188(DEC)
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern from the Court’s report that regarding the three comments made in the Court’s 2011 and 2012 reports, the status of corrective action is still marked as “Ongoing”;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Observes from the Court’s report that the level of committed appropriations carried forward to 2016 was at 26 % for Title II (administrative expenditure) and at 33 % for Title III (operational expenditure); notes that these carry forwards are mainly related to the multiannual nature of the Authority’s large IT projects, as well as mission expenses that could only be reimbursed in 2016; points outnotes that the carryovers aremay often be partly or fully justified by the multiannual nature of the centre’ operational programmes, and do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation nor are they always at odds with the budgetary principle of annularity, in particular if they are planned in advance by the Centre and communicated to the Court;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes note that the Authority aims to reach the best possible gender and geographical balance during its recruitment process; notes that the Authority’s global gender balance was at 44 % female and 56 % male; observes/ 56 %, and that the Authority’s staff includes 22 different Union nationalities, and 1 national from the European Economic Area (Norway);
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that Management Board members of the Authority are required to sign a declaration of the absence of conflict of interest in contrast to a declaration of interests, but; regrets, however, that the declarations and the CVs of its Board members are not published on the Agency’s website;