6 Amendments of Petri SARVAMAA related to 2017/2153(DEC)
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Notes out that carry-overs may often be partly or fully justified by the multiannual nature of the agencies’ operational programmes, do not necessarily indicate weaknesses in budget planning and implementation and are not always at odds with the budgetary principle of annularity, in particular if they are planned in advance by the Agency and communicated to the Court; points out, however, that the high share of cancelled carry-overs (10 %) could be considered a sign of inaccurate budget planning;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses that the work-life balance should be part of the staff policy of the Centre; stressnotes that the budget spent on well- being activities amounts to EUR 13 754; observes that the average number of sick leave days taken per staff was 13,04 days in 2016;
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. RegretNotes that the Agency does not make the minutes of its management board meetings public; calls oninvites the Agency to consider changeing its policy;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Takes note of the Agency’s grounds for refusal to access documents; calls onexpects the Agency to use in the most restrictedlawful and regular manner the possibility to refuse access to documents while protecting confidential or personal data confidential;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 6
Subheading 6
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Strongly regrets however that the Centre does not use impact indicators, outcome indicators, or input indicators for its programming documents; notes that the Centre does not perform systematic ex ante assessments for planning and controls, and furthermore calls on the Centre to use systematic ex-post evaluations to measure its performance;