31 Amendments of Jean-Jacob BICEP related to 2011/0294(COD)
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
Recital 2
(2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union, including the remote and outermost regions.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
Recital 3
(3) These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient waysustainable way, taking full account of the need to safeguard the environment as a whole.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
Recital 9
(9) The trans-European transport network should best be developed through a dual layer approach, consisting of a comprehensive network and a core network, these two layers being the highest level of infrastructure planning within the Union.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) With a view to developing a trans- European transport network which is respectful of the environment and territories as a whole, impacts in terms of soil and air pollution, biodiversity protection and noise pollution should be assessed in detail when infrastructure is built or developed.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The guidelines provide for measures for thand deadlines for the smooth and sustainable implementation of the trans-European network.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – point r a (new)
Article 3 – point r a (new)
(ra) 'socio-economic cost-benefit analysis' means a quantified ex-ante evaluation on the basis of a harmonised methodology of the value of a project or programme, including an overall environmental impact assessment, taking into account all social, economic and environmental costs and benefits, and serving as an indicator of contribution to well-being;
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) meet the mobility and transport needs of all its users within the Union and in the relations with third countries, thereby contributing to further economic growth and competitiveness and enhance social cohesion;
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) are economically efficient, contribute to the objectives of low-carbon and clean transport, fuel security and environmental protection in accordance with the criteria laid down in Article 3(ra), are safe and secure and have high quality standards, both for passenger and freight transport;
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) promote the most advanced technological and operational concepts which make it possible to exploit clean and socially and environmentally sustainable transport modes to the full;
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) contribute to a shift towards the transport modes which are the cleanest and most sustainable in terms of social cohesion and respect for the environment;
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the development of allas a matter of priority of the cleanest transport modes in a manner consistent with ensuring sustainable and economically efficient transport in the long term;
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) promotion of a broadthe use of transport with the most carbon neutral effelowest environmental impact;
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – title
Article 5 – title
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) the assessment of strategic environmental impact, with the establishment of appropriate plans and programmes and of impacts on climate mitigation;
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1
Article 7 – paragraph 1
1. Projects of common interest shall contribute to the development of the trans- European transport network through the creation of new transport infrastructure, the maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading of existing transport infrastructure and through measures promoting its resource- efficient uselower environmental impact.
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) have been subject to a socio-economic cost benefit analysis in accordance with Article 3(ra) resulting in a positive net present value;
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) In the specific case of island, remote and outermost regions, provide, when their geographical configuration so requires, a dense and sustainable network of links between them in their geographical area;
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g
(g) promoting state-of-the-artclean technological development;
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(ia) internalise external costs;
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1
Article 44 – paragraph 1
1. The core network shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans- European transport network policy. The core network shall in particular contribute to coping with increasing mobility and to the development of a low-carbonn environmentally friendly transport system.
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point d – indent 1
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point d – indent 1
- capacity to make available alternative clean fuelsavailability of alternative clean fuels as soon as they are developed.
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 1
Article 48 – paragraph 1
1. Core network corridors are an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network. Core network corridors shall be based on modal integration, interoperability, as well as on a coordinated development and management of infrastructure, in order to lead to resource-efficientenvironmentally friendly multimodal transport.
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 48 – paragraph 2
Article 48 – paragraph 2
2. Core network corridors shall provide for a coordinated approach with regard to infrastructure use and investments, so as to manage capacities in the most efficient and sustainable way. Multimodal infrastructure within core network corridors shall be built and coordinated, wherever needed, in a way that optimises the use of each transport mode and their cooperation. The core network corridors shall support the comprehensive deployment of interoperable traffic management systems.
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of core network corridors, the Commission shall designate, after consultation withwith the agreement of the Member States concerned, and after having consultedof the European Parliament, persons called "European Coordinator".
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 2
Article 51 – paragraph 2
2. The European Coordinator shall be chosen, in particular, on the basis of his/her experience ofat European institutionslevel and knowledge of issues relating to the financing and the socio-economic and environmental evaluation of major projects.
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 4
Article 51 – paragraph 4
4. The European Coordinator shall act in the name and on behalf of the Commission. The remit of the European Coordinator shall relate to a single core network corridor. The European Coordinator shall draw up together with the Member States concerned a work plan for the activities to be fulfilled, verifying that the requisite consultations have been held with local and regional authorities and with civil society.
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(da) a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis as defined in Article 3(ra);
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 5
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 5
- measures to be taken in order to mitigate greenhouse gas emissionenvironmental impacts;
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 08/33
Annex I – Volume 08/33
To add the port of Guyane (FR) to the core network
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 08/33
Annex I – Volume 08/33
Incorporate the Tours-Dijon section into the core network
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – Section 1a
Annex II – Section 1a
add Nantes (FR)