Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | KOUMOUTSAKOS Georgios ( PPE), ERTUG Ismail ( S&D) | BILBAO BARANDICA Izaskun ( ALDE), CRAMER Michael ( Verts/ALE), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ANTONESCU Elena Oana ( PPE) | Inés AYALA SENDER ( S&D), Jiří MAŠTÁLKA ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | VLASÁK Oldřich ( ECR) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | COFFERATI Sergio Gaetano ( S&D) | Matteo SALVINI ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 172
Legal Basis:
TFEU 172Events
The Commission presents a report on the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU.
Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU sets out a long-term strategy for the development of a complete trans-European transport network (TEN-T), consisting of infrastructure for railways, maritime and air transport, roads, inland waterways and rail-road terminals.
Article 49(4) of Regulation - Adaptations of the list and the maps based on statistical data
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 contains maps of the comprehensive and core networks which define the scope of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 and identify projects of common interest.
Annex II to this Regulation establishes the list of nodes of the core and comprehensive network. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts which will adapt the maps and lists annexed to the Regulation as regards the quantitative thresholds which are necessary to be met by sea and inland ports, airports and rail-road terminals to be part of the TEN-T. The Commission adopted on 7 December 2016 the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 2017/849.
The Commission may also adjust the maps for road, railway and inland waterway infrastructure in a strictly limited way so as to reflect progress in completing the network.
Article 49(6) of the Regulation - Adaptations of the indicative maps of the neighbouring countries
Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 contains indicative maps of certain neighbouring countries. The Regulation provides for the possibility to adopt delegated acts to adapt those maps or to include maps of further neighbouring countries, based on high-level agreements on transport infrastructure networks between the Union and the neighbouring countries concerned.
The Commission used this delegation in the following instances:
- the Commission adopted on 17 January 2014, the Delegated Regulation No 473/2014. This regulation concerns the lines of the railway and road network, as well as the ports, airports and rail-road terminals on the comprehensive network in the following third countries: Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia;
- the Commission adopted on 4 February 2016, the Delegated Regulation No 2016/758. This regulation concerns the identification of the core network connections on the comprehensive network maps of the railway and road networks, as well as ports and airports in the following third countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, the Republic of North Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia;
- the Commission adopted on 9 November 2018, the Delegated Regulation No 2019/254. This regulation concerns the revision of the indicative extension of the comprehensive TEN-T maps, as well as the identification of the core network connections on the comprehensive network maps in the following third countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Republic of Moldova and Ukraine.
Prior to the adoption of all the delegated acts referred to above, the Commission consulted experts from the Member States and the representatives of the European Parliament.
Lastly, the Commission invites the European Parliament and the Council to take note of this Report. In the future, the Commission plans to use its delegated powers for the further adaptations of the Annexes I, II and III to Regulation (EU) 1315/2013.
In accordance with Regulation (EU) nº 1315/2013, the Commission presents a progress report on implementation of the TEN-T network in 2014-2015.
The report assesses the state of the technical implementation of the TEN-T, and the financial investments made on the TEN-T. It paints a rather positive picture of the progress already achieved on the TEN-T core and comprehensive network. Indeed, large parts of TEN-T already show a high compliance level with TEN-T Regulation requirements.
Level of compliance of infrastructure: the report notes that the current state of implementation of TEN-T transport infrastructure in terms of compliance with the TEN-T Regulation requirements reaches between 75% and 100% for half of the currently available indicators, whereas for the other half it is still below 75%.
· Rail: the currently available data indicates that the standard track gauge of 1435 mm is present on 77% of the rail core network and 76% of the comprehensive rail network. As for electrification , around 81% of the TEN-T network is compliant with the TEN-T requirement. However, the ERTMS is in operation only on 9.5% of core network corridors sections as of end 2015, suggesting the clear need for more investment. In 2023, the ERTMS European Deployment Plan will be updated again setting out the precise implementation dates for the remaining part of the Corridors between 2024 and 2030.
· Roads: the results show that 74.5% of the core network is currently compliant with the standard, whereas only 58.1% of roads on comprehensive network fulfil the requirement. In the framework of the Alternative Fuels Directive 2014/94/EU, the Commission is currently analysing the national policy frameworks for the market development of alternative fuels and their infrastructure.
· Ports and inland waterways: the core network is already 95% compliant with regard to the CEMT IV requirements for class IV, 79.6% compliant with regard to RIS implementation and 68% in terms of permissible draught of 2.5 m. 100% of the seaports are connected to rail, but the connection of ports to the inland waterways of CEMT class IV is far from being compliant.
· Airports: the connection of airports to rail is still below 75% of compliance. In 2015, 23 core airports out of the 38 core airports (60.5%) that fall under obligation to be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 2050, are already connected to rail.
Financial investments made in the TEN-T: in the course of 2014 and 2015, the total investment made by the EU institutions from their financial sources (i.e. TENT/CEF, ERDF/CF and EIB loans) in TEN-T core and comprehensive network infrastructure amounted to EUR 30.67 billion in all 28 Member States. In addition to this, some EUR 1.1 billion of EU financial assistance was allocated under grant agreements to studies' projects in 2014 and 2015.
With regard to modal shares , the highest investment volume with respect to EU grants altogether is reported for rail which absorbed as much as 51.5% of total EU expenditures in the TEN-T network in 2014 and 2015. The share of road infrastructure investment reached 30.6% of total expenditure, followed by 9.2% for ports and Motorways of the Sea, 5.5% for airports (including SESAR), 2.1% for multimodal infrastructure and 1.1% for inland waterways.
In all, the Commission feels that in most cases significant improvements are still required and significant investment needed to reach the objectives of the TEN-T Regulation, particularly regarding inland waterways. While transport infrastructure needs are estimated at about EUR 1.3 trillion per year at the global level2 and around EUR 130 billion per year at the European level, the average investment levels in the EU are well below EUR 100 billion since the beginning of the crisis.
Conclusion: the report concludes that the first two years of implementing the new policy approach show that a wide range of different instruments have been successfully put in place in order to realise the TEN-T. In future reports, the level of investment at Member States' level needs to be analysed in detail as to complete the above picture in terms of investment priorities and financial needs in relation to the technical compliance of the network.
The progress made in implementing projects for that purpose now needs to be carefully and continuously monitored so as to ensure that the core network, including its core network corridors, will be completed by 2030 and the comprehensive network by 2050.
PURPOSE: to define a long-term strategy for the creation and development of a trans-European transport network (TEN-T).
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) n° 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and repealing Decision No 661/2010/EU
CONTENT: the Regulation establishes new guidelines defining a long-term strategy for the development of a complete trans-European transport network (TEN-T) which is designed to cover all Member States and regions as well as all transport modes (railways, maritime and air transport, roads and inland waterways). The new Regulation, replaces the current guidelines adopted in 1996, amended in 2004 and updated in 2010 (Decision No 661/2010/EU).
Purpose: the trans-European transport network shall strengthen:
· the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the Union , through accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union including remote, regions, as well as through reduction of infrastructure quality gaps between Member States;
· efficiency through the removal of bottlenecks and the bridging of missing links, the interconnection and interoperability of national transport networks, optimal integration and interconnection of all transport modes, and the promotion of economically efficient, high-quality transport;
· sustainability through promotion of low-carbon transport with the aim of achieving by 2050 a significant reduction in CO2 emissions.
Double-layer structure : the trans-European transport network is best be developed through a dual-layer structure consisting of: (1) a comprehensive network and (2) a core network, the latter being within the framework of the comprehensive network.
· The comprehensive network shall consist of all existing and planned transport infrastructures of the trans-European transport network as well as measures promoting the efficient and socially and environmentally sustainable use of such infrastructure. The guidelines laid down by the Regulation set the requirements for the infrastructure of the comprehensive network, in order to promote the development of a high-quality network throughout the Union by 2050.
· The core network , described in Annex I, will consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives for the development of the trans-European transport network, reflecting evolving traffic demand and the need for multimodal transport. It will stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and must be established by 31 December 2030.
Core network corridors : these are an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network and are focused on: (a) modal integration, (b) interoperability, (c) a coordinated development of infrastructure, in particular in cross-border sections and bottlenecks. They will enable Member States to achieve a coordinated and synchronised approach with regard to investment in infrastructure.
In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of core network corridors, ERTMS and motorways of the sea, the Commission will, in agreement with the Member States concerned, and after consulting the European Parliament and the Council, designate one or more European Coordinators .
The Regulation sets out the role of the European Coordinators, which is of major importance for the development of, and cooperation along, the corridors. Each European Coordinator shall, by 22 December 2014 , submit to the Member States concerned a work plan analysing the development of the corridor. After it has been approved by the Member States concerned, the work plan shall be submitted for information to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Projects of common interest : the Regulation set out the framework for identifying projects of common interest and specifies the requirements to be complied with for the management of the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network.
Projects of common interest shall:
· contribute to the development of the trans-European transport network through the creation of new transport infrastructure , through the rehabilitation and upgrading of the existing transport infrastructure and through measures promoting the resource-efficient use of the network;
· demonstrate European added value and be economically viable taking into account the relevant social, economic, climate-related and environmental benefits and costs.
The implementation of projects of common interest depends on their degree of maturity, the compliance with Union and national legal procedures, and the availability of financial resources.
Updating and reporting : Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects and the investments made for that purpose. This shall include the transmission of annual data as far as possible through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec).
Engagement with public and private stakeholders : projects of common interest relate to all directly concerned stakeholders. Accordingly, the Regulation provides that national procedures regarding regional and local authorities as well as civil society affected by a project of common interest shall be complied with, where appropriate, in the planning and construction phase of a project.
Review : by 31 December 2023 , the Commission shall carry out a review of the implementation of the core network. In addition to carrying out that review, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, shall assess whether new sections, such as certain former cross-border priority projects listed in Decision No 661/2010/EU, are to be included in the core network.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 21.12.2013.
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission may adopt delegated acts in order to update the maps included in Annex I. The power to adopt such acts is conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from 21 December 2013. The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections with regard to a delegated act within two months of the date of notification (which may be extended by two months). If Parliament or Council raise objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 546 votes to 104 with 41 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network.
Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary were the result of a compromise negotiated between Parliament and council. They amended the proposal as follows :
Scope : the amended text states that the trans-European transport network comprises transport infrastructure and telematic applications as well as measures promoting the efficient management and use of such infrastructure and permitting the establishment and operation of sustainable and efficient transport services.
Inland waterway transport will be covered by the regulation.
Objectives and priorities : the trans-European transport network shall demonstrate European added value by contributing to the objectives laid down in the following four categories:
(a) cohesion through: (i) accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including remote, outermost, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions, as well as sparsely populated areas; (ii) reduction of infrastructure quality gaps between Member States; (iii) a transport infrastructure that provides for a balanced coverage of all European regions;
(b) efficiency through: (i) the removal of bottlenecks and the bridging of missing links; (ii) the interconnection and interoperability of national transport networks; (iii) optimal integration and interconnection of all transport modes; (iii) cost-efficient application of innovative technological and operational concepts;
(c) sustainability through the promotion of low-carbon transport with the aim of achieving by 2050 a significant reduction in CO2 emissions, in line with the relevant Union CO2 reduction targets;
(d) increasing the benefits for its users through: (i) meeting the mobility and transport needs of its users within the Union and in relations with third countries;(ii) ensuring safe, secure and high-quality standards, for both passenger and freight transport; (iii) supporting mobility even in the event of natural or man-made disasters, and ensuring accessibility to emergency and rescue services; (iv) accessibility for elderly people, persons of reduced mobility and disabled passengers.
Planning the trans-European transport network : in planning and developing the trans-European transport network, Member States shall take account of the particular circumstances in the various parts of the Union , such as, in particular, tourism aspects and topographical features of the regions concerned. Furthermore, the interests of regional and local authorities and representatives of civil society must be taken into account in relation to the planning and design of projects.
Eligibility criteria for projects of common interest : projects of common interest should be economically viable on the basis of a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and environmentally sustainable and feasible. Member States should carry out ex-ante assessments of the accessibility of infrastructure and of the services connected to it.
Regarding cooperation with third countries, projects must: (i) connect the core network at border crossing points and concern infrastructure necessary to ensure seamless traffic flow, border checks, border surveillance and other border control procedures; (ii) promote maritime transport and motorways of the sea, excluding financial support to third-country ports;(iii) facilitate inland waterway transport with third countries.
Motorways of the sea : the amended text states that motorways of the sea, representing as they do the maritime dimension of the trans-European transport network, shall contribute towards the achievement of a European maritime transport space without barriers .
Within two years after being designated, the European Coordinator for motorways of the sea shall present a detailed implementation plan for the motorways of the sea based on experiences and developments relating to Union maritime transport as well as the forecast traffic on the motorways of the sea.
Telematic applications: telematic applications - for railways : ERTMS; for inland waterways: RIS; for road transport: ITS; shall be subject to simplified administrative procedures and shall be deployed where feasible across the Union, in order to enable a set of interoperable basic capabilities to exist in all Member States.
Core network : the core network, as shown on the maps contained in Annex I, shall reflect evolving traffic demand and the need for multimodal transport. It shall, in particular, contribute to coping with increasing mobility and ensuring a high safety standard as well as contributing to the development of a low-carbon transport system.
The nodes of the core network include : inland waterways ports; railroad terminals; and passenger and freight airports.
In order to establish the core network in a coordinated and timely manner, Member States concerned should ensure that appropriate measures are taken to finalise the projects of common interest by 2030 . By 31 December 2023, the Commission shall carry out a review of the implementation of the core network.
Infrastructure and railway transport: railway transport infrastructure of the core network shall meet the following requirements: (i) full electrification of the line tracks; (ii) freight lines with the possibility of running trains with a length of 740 m; (iii) full deployment of ERTMS; (iv) nominal track gauge for new railway lines of 1435 mm.
The particular situation of isolated rail networks should be recognised by way of exemptions from certain infrastructure requirements.
Core network corridors : these will be focused on infrastructure development of the core network so as to eliminate bottlenecks, improve cross-border connections and improve efficiency and sustainability. They should contribute to cohesion through improved territorial cooperation. The corridor approach should be transparent and clear and the management of such corridors should not create additional administrative burdens or costs.
The amended text stressed the role of the European Coordinators, which was of major importance for the development of, and cooperation along, the corridors.
One year after the entry into force of this Regulation each European Coordinator shall submit to the Member States concerned a work plan analysing the development of the corridor. After it has been approved by the Member States concerned, the work plan shall be submitted for information to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
Updating and reporting : Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects and the investments made for that purpose. This shall include the transmission of annual data as far as possible through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include all relevant data concerning projects of common interest in receipt of Union funding.
The Council agreed on a partial general approach on a draft regulation establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), the future funding instrument for the trans-European networks (TEN) in the fields of transport, energy and telecommunications.
The draft regulation determines the conditions, methods and procedures for the Union's financial contribution to TEN projects, while the development strategies, priorities and implementation measures for each of the sectors are defined in sector-specific policy guidelines which will be adopted separately. The Council has already agreed on a general approach on guidelines for the transport sector (TEN-T guidelines : 8047/12 ).
The overall objective of the CEF is to help create high-performing and environmentally-sustainable interconnected networks across Europe, thereby contributing to economic growth and social and territorial cohesion within the Union. In the field of transport, the CEF will support projects that pursue the following sector-specific objectives: (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links; (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long term; (iii) improving the integration and interconnection of different transport modes and enhancing interoperability.
The main outstanding issue concerns requests by several delegations to extend the possibilities of financing road projects by means of grants .
While the transport part of the CEF regulation strongly focuses on the funding of railways and inland waterways, it also, under certain conditions, allows the financing of road projects through grants.
As a result of its discussions, the Council agreed to add member states with an isolated rail network without long-distance rail freight transport to the cases where grants can be given to road projects.
In addition, it was decided to provide for co-financing of road works at cross-border sections in all member states at a rate of up to 10 %. All those funding possibilities, however, are subject to the general conditions for grants for TEN-T projects.
Apart from road financing, in order to reach broad agreement on a final compromise, the Council increased the co-financing rate for the development of the Motorways of the Seas from 20 % to 30 % and added the interconnection of maritime ports to the indicators for achieving the objective of enhanced interconnection and interoperability.
In addition, to accommodate requests from delegations, some modifications concerning rail or road sections or ports have been introduced into the list of core network corridors set out in the annex to the regulation. Moreover, it will be clarified in a recital that the completion of the core transport network includes not only the creation of new infrastructure, but also the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing infrastructure.
The budget to be made available for the trans-European networks under the CEF will depend on the results of the negotiations on the next multiannual framework and is therefore not yet included in this partial general approach. The Commission has proposed EUR 50 billion for the years 2014 to 2020, with EUR 31.7 billion (including EUR 10 billion earmarked in the Cohesion Fund) allocated to the transport sector.
The Council took note of a report presented by the presidency on the state of play on new guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T). The Council's preparatory bodies have only recently started to discuss the guidelines proposed by the Commission. While Member States generally support the proposal to introduce a double-layer structure distinguishing between a core network to be put into place as a priority and a comprehensive network, other aspects of the proposed guidelines will need further discussion.
Member States' main concerns are as follows:
· the budgetary consequences are considered problematic by several Member States, especially as regards the costs for meeting the requirements set out in the guidelines for the different modes of transport, in particular rail transport;
· several delegations underscored the need to ensure Member States' right to decide on projects to be carried out on their territory;
· while the core network corridor concept set out in the proposal was supported by several Member States, several other delegations were critical or pointed to the need for clarification;
· the governance of the corridors was mentioned as an important issue for further discussion, and the need to avoid an increase in the administrative burden was underlined.
Other issues raised include the binding deadlines proposed by the Commission for setting up the core and the comprehensive networks, and the Commission's decision to give the guidelines the legal form of a regulation, which is directly addressed to all potential stakeholders, including regional and local authorities and private bodies, rather than a decision addressed only to the Member States, as is the case for the guidelines currently in force.
While the core network corridor concept set out in the proposal was supported by several Member States, several other delegations were critical or pointed to the need for clarification.
Several Member States have criticized the Commission’s corridor approach because this issue is also covered by the proposal on the Connecting Europe Facility Regulation, which would create legal uncertainty, and because this approach does not respect the principle of subsidiarity.
Several Member States have expressed their reservations regarding the Commission’s proposal to strengthen the role of the European Coordinators with respect to the implementation of the core network through core network corridors and the introduction of the concept of corridor platforms. Several Member States have also indicated the need to avoid the unnecessary increase of administrative structures and related costs.
Several Member States also stressed the importance of transport connections with neighbouring non-EU countries .
Lastly, as regards the delegated acts , a large majority of Member States have indicated that they favour a cautious approach. They consider that the power to adopt delegated acts should be conferred to the Commission just for a limited period, such as five years, from the date of entry into force of the Regulation.
PURPOSE: the coordinated creation and development of a trans-European transport network.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union. These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient way.
Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans-European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States.
Five main problems need to be tackled at EU level:
(1) missing links, in particular at cross-border sections, are a major obstacle to the free movement of goods and passengers within and between the Member States and with its neighbours;
(2) a considerable and enduring disparity in quality and availability of infrastructure between and within the Member States (bottlenecks);
(3) transport infrastructure between the transport modes is fragmented ;
(4) investments in transport infrastructures should contribute to achieve the goals of reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in transport by 60% by 2050;
(5) Member States still maintain different operational rules and requirements , in particular in the field of interoperability, which add to the transport infrastructure barriers and bottlenecks.
These new guidelines, which will replace Decision 661/2010/EU, seek to establish a complete and integrated trans-European transport network , covering all Member States and regions and providing the basis for the balanced development of all transport modes in order to facilitate their respective advantages, thereby maximising the value added for Europe of the network.
In the light of the challenges for the TEN-T policy, also identified by the White Paper “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system” , these Guidelines will define a long-term strategy for the TEN-T policy up to 2030/2050.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: t he Impact Assessment identifies four specific objectives for addressing the problem of a fragmented network. This involves, on the one hand, enhanced coordination in EU planning and the designing of a sound governance structure to secure implementation of an optimal network configuration.
Two policy options were the result:
option 1 , combining a planning approach largely based on the current policy, though with certain amendments in the light of the experience gained, with a reinforced coordination approach to implementation; option 2 , combining a stronger approach to planning coordination, through identification of an optimised configuration for the strategic "core" of the TEN-T, with the same reinforced coordination approach to implementation. The Commission considers that this second option, because of the stronger coordination at both planning and implementation levels, would have an overall higher impact.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 172 of the TFEU.
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation will repeal and replace Decision 661/2010/EU on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. This proposal aims to establish and develop a complete TEN-T, consisting of infrastructure for railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and air transport, thereby ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and strengthening economic and social cohesion.
To achieve these objectives, two fields of action are envisaged:
- the first field of action is " conceptual planning ": the gradual implementation of the TEN-T network by means of a dual-layer approach , consisting of a comprehensive network and a core network. The comprehensive network constitutes the basic layer of the TEN-T. It consists of all existing and planned infrastructure meeting the requirements of the Guidelines. The comprehensive network is to be in place by 31 December 2050 at the latest.
The core network overlays the comprehensive network and consists of its strategically most important parts. It constitutes the backbone of the multi-modal mobility network. It concentrates on those components of TEN-T with the highest European added value: cross border missing links, key bottlenecks and multi-modal nodes. The core network is to be in place by 31 December 2030 at the latest.
- the second field of action concerns the implementation instruments . The Commission has developed the concept of core network corridors , taking due account of the rail freight corridors. These corridors will provide the framework instrument for the coordinated implementation of the core network. In terms of scope, the core network corridors will in principle cover three transport modes and cross at least three Member States. If possible, they should establish a connection with a maritime port.
In terms of activities, the core network corridors will provide a platform for capacity management, investments, building and coordinating multi-modal transhipment facilities, and deploying interoperable traffic management systems.
The proposal includes the following key aspects:
Guidelines : the Guidelines set the framework for identifying projects of common interest. These projects contribute to the development and establishment of TEN-T through the creation, maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading of infrastructure, through measures to promote the resource-efficient use of infrastructure and by enabling sustainable and efficient freight transport services. With a view to cooperation with third and neighbouring countries , the European Union may promote projects of mutual interest.
The comprehensive network is specified by:
maps; infrastructure components; infrastructure requirements; priorities for promoting projects of common interest. freight terminals, passenger stations, inland ports, maritime ports and airports will connect transport modes in order to allow multi-modal transport; urban nodes form key elements in the comprehensive network as connecting points between the different transport infrastructures.
Core network :
the guidelines lay down specific requirements for the core network, in addition to the requirements for the comprehensive network, for example availability of alternative fuels. The Commission will monitor and evaluate the progress made in implementing the core network; core network corridors are an instrument for implementing the core network. They are to be based on modal integration and interoperability and lead to coordinated development and management; European Coordinators will facilitate the coordinated implementation of the corridors, in cooperation with corridor platforms to be established by Member States concerned; ach corridor platform will establish a multi-annual development plan, including investment and implementation plans, as a management structure. Based on this information the Commission will adopt implementing acts (decisions) for each corridor.
Lastly, the proposal calls for regular revision of the annexes by means of delegated acts in order to update the maps of the comprehensive network. It also envisages a review of the core network by 2023.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the proposal will not entail any additional cost for the EU budget.
It should be noted that in the context of the Communication on the Multi-annual Financial Framework 2014-2020 , the Commission has announced the creation of a new instrument at EU level, the '' Connecting Europe Facility " , which will finance EU priority infrastructure in transport, energy and digital broadband. The facility will have a single fund of EUR 50 billion for the period 2014-2020, of which EUR 31.7 billion will be allocated to transport, out of which €10 billion will be ring fenced for related transport infrastructures investments inside the Member States eligible under the Cohesion Fund.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions enabling the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the TFEU.
PURPOSE: the coordinated creation and development of a trans-European transport network.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: the planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union. These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient way.
Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans-European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States.
Five main problems need to be tackled at EU level:
(1) missing links, in particular at cross-border sections, are a major obstacle to the free movement of goods and passengers within and between the Member States and with its neighbours;
(2) a considerable and enduring disparity in quality and availability of infrastructure between and within the Member States (bottlenecks);
(3) transport infrastructure between the transport modes is fragmented ;
(4) investments in transport infrastructures should contribute to achieve the goals of reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in transport by 60% by 2050;
(5) Member States still maintain different operational rules and requirements , in particular in the field of interoperability, which add to the transport infrastructure barriers and bottlenecks.
These new guidelines, which will replace Decision 661/2010/EU, seek to establish a complete and integrated trans-European transport network , covering all Member States and regions and providing the basis for the balanced development of all transport modes in order to facilitate their respective advantages, thereby maximising the value added for Europe of the network.
In the light of the challenges for the TEN-T policy, also identified by the White Paper “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system” , these Guidelines will define a long-term strategy for the TEN-T policy up to 2030/2050.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: t he Impact Assessment identifies four specific objectives for addressing the problem of a fragmented network. This involves, on the one hand, enhanced coordination in EU planning and the designing of a sound governance structure to secure implementation of an optimal network configuration.
Two policy options were the result:
option 1 , combining a planning approach largely based on the current policy, though with certain amendments in the light of the experience gained, with a reinforced coordination approach to implementation; option 2 , combining a stronger approach to planning coordination, through identification of an optimised configuration for the strategic "core" of the TEN-T, with the same reinforced coordination approach to implementation. The Commission considers that this second option, because of the stronger coordination at both planning and implementation levels, would have an overall higher impact.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 172 of the TFEU.
CONTENT: the proposed Regulation will repeal and replace Decision 661/2010/EU on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. This proposal aims to establish and develop a complete TEN-T, consisting of infrastructure for railways, inland waterways, roads, maritime and air transport, thereby ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and strengthening economic and social cohesion.
To achieve these objectives, two fields of action are envisaged:
- the first field of action is " conceptual planning ": the gradual implementation of the TEN-T network by means of a dual-layer approach , consisting of a comprehensive network and a core network. The comprehensive network constitutes the basic layer of the TEN-T. It consists of all existing and planned infrastructure meeting the requirements of the Guidelines. The comprehensive network is to be in place by 31 December 2050 at the latest.
The core network overlays the comprehensive network and consists of its strategically most important parts. It constitutes the backbone of the multi-modal mobility network. It concentrates on those components of TEN-T with the highest European added value: cross border missing links, key bottlenecks and multi-modal nodes. The core network is to be in place by 31 December 2030 at the latest.
- the second field of action concerns the implementation instruments . The Commission has developed the concept of core network corridors , taking due account of the rail freight corridors. These corridors will provide the framework instrument for the coordinated implementation of the core network. In terms of scope, the core network corridors will in principle cover three transport modes and cross at least three Member States. If possible, they should establish a connection with a maritime port.
In terms of activities, the core network corridors will provide a platform for capacity management, investments, building and coordinating multi-modal transhipment facilities, and deploying interoperable traffic management systems.
The proposal includes the following key aspects:
Guidelines : the Guidelines set the framework for identifying projects of common interest. These projects contribute to the development and establishment of TEN-T through the creation, maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading of infrastructure, through measures to promote the resource-efficient use of infrastructure and by enabling sustainable and efficient freight transport services. With a view to cooperation with third and neighbouring countries , the European Union may promote projects of mutual interest.
The comprehensive network is specified by:
maps; infrastructure components; infrastructure requirements; priorities for promoting projects of common interest. freight terminals, passenger stations, inland ports, maritime ports and airports will connect transport modes in order to allow multi-modal transport; urban nodes form key elements in the comprehensive network as connecting points between the different transport infrastructures.
Core network :
the guidelines lay down specific requirements for the core network, in addition to the requirements for the comprehensive network, for example availability of alternative fuels. The Commission will monitor and evaluate the progress made in implementing the core network; core network corridors are an instrument for implementing the core network. They are to be based on modal integration and interoperability and lead to coordinated development and management; European Coordinators will facilitate the coordinated implementation of the corridors, in cooperation with corridor platforms to be established by Member States concerned; ach corridor platform will establish a multi-annual development plan, including investment and implementation plans, as a management structure. Based on this information the Commission will adopt implementing acts (decisions) for each corridor.
Lastly, the proposal calls for regular revision of the annexes by means of delegated acts in order to update the maps of the comprehensive network. It also envisages a review of the core network by 2023.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the proposal will not entail any additional cost for the EU budget.
It should be noted that in the context of the Communication on the Multi-annual Financial Framework 2014-2020 , the Commission has announced the creation of a new instrument at EU level, the '' Connecting Europe Facility " , which will finance EU priority infrastructure in transport, energy and digital broadband. The facility will have a single fund of EUR 50 billion for the period 2014-2020, of which EUR 31.7 billion will be allocated to transport, out of which €10 billion will be ring fenced for related transport infrastructures investments inside the Member States eligible under the Cohesion Fund.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions enabling the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the TFEU.
Documents
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2021)0818
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0433
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0211
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0327
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2013/1315
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 348 20.12.2013, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00042/2013/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0464/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2013)006016
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0012/2013
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0012/2013
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.436
- Committee opinion: PE489.699
- Committee opinion: PE492.666
- Committee opinion: PE487.783
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.673
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.842
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.841
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Committee draft report: PE489.704
- Debate in Council: 3171
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0008/2012
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0492/2012
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Debate in Council: 3134
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1213
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0650
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1212
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0650
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)1213
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0650 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1212 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0492/2012
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0008/2012
- Committee draft report: PE489.704
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.841
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE494.842
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.673
- Committee opinion: PE487.783
- Committee opinion: PE492.666
- Committee opinion: PE489.699
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE500.436
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading/single reading: A7-0012/2013
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2013)006016
- Draft final act: 00042/2013/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Follow-up document: COM(2017)0327 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2019)0211 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: COM(2020)0433 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex COM(2021)0818
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
- Contribution: COM(2011)0650
Activities
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Silvia COSTA
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Zoltán BAGÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Marino BALDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Piotr BORYS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Jean-Marie CAVADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Sergio Gaetano COFFERATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Kinga GÖNCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Georgios KOUMOUTSAKOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marek Henryk MIGALSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Krisztina MORVAI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Doris PACK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Chrysoula PALIADELI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Marie-Thérèse SANCHEZ-SCHMID
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Marietje SCHAAKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Marco SCURRIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Hannu TAKKULA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
- Helga TRÜPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Creative Europe programme (debate)
Votes
A7-0012/2013 - Georgios Koumoutsakos et Ismail Ertug - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
1080 |
2011/0294(COD)
2012/07/10
ENVI
47 amendments...
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union. Trans-European transport networks should also contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy and favour the transition towards a low-carbon economy and society that are less dependent on fossil energy and thus more resistant to climate change and natural disasters.
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) These specific objectives should be
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) Policy on trans-European transport networks must contribute to the EU 2050 climate objectives in line with the ‘Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ and must help to reduce external costs. To this end, the objectives concerned must be taken as a basis for specifically defining the criteria for the implementation of projects and the allocation of funds.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The core network should be identified and implemented as a priority within the framework provided by the comprehensive network by 2030. It should constitute the backbone of the development of a multi- modal transport network and stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network. It should enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular serving the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 60 % by 2050, cross-border sections, missing links, multi-
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the impact of
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) In order to update the Annexes and in particular the maps to take into account possible changes resulting from the actual usage of certain elements of transport infrastructure analysed against pre- established quantitative thresholds, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the Annexes. It is of particular importance for the Commission to carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level and with civil society with local expertise. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) ‘European added value’ means, in relation to a project, the value resulting from Union intervention which is assessed and demonstrated to be additional to the value that would otherwise have been created by Member State action alone. This added value shall contribute to meeting the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy and the Roadmap for moving to a low- carbon economy in 2050;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are economically efficient, contribute to the objectives of low-carbon and clean transport in accordance with the EU 2050 climate objectives and the ‘Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’, fuel security and environmental protection, are safe and secure and have high quality standards, both for passenger and freight transport;
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) the removal of bottlenecks and the bridging of missing links, both within the transport infrastructures, including LNG bunkering terminals for ships, and at connecting points between these, within Member States' territories and at border crossing points between them;
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the development of all transport modes in a manner consistent both with the EU climate objectives and with ensuring sustainable and economically efficient transport in the long term;
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage of European regions, including outermost regions, mountainous and isolated areas, and other peripheral ones;
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point k a (new) (ka) the development of infrastructure which is sensitive to the need to protect areas of ecological value and biodiversity.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. These objectives shall be taken as a basis for specifically defining the criteria for the implementation of projects and the allocation of funds.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – introductory part Member States and, as appropriate, regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport operators and other public and private entities shall plan, develop and operate the trans-European transport network in a resource efficient and sustainable way, through:
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) adequate consideration of the vulnerability of transport infrastructure with regard to
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) improving or maintaining the quality of infrastructure in terms of efficiency, safety, security,
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – introductory part (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC for new and upgraded lines, except in duly justified cases, where allowed by the relevant TSI or under the procedure provided for in Article 9 of Directive 2008/57/EC.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – point 1 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – point 2 Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – point 3 Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – point 4 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – point a a (new) (aa) migrating to 1 435 mm. nominal track gauge;
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – point a (a) for existing inland waterways: implementing measures necessary to reach the standards of the inland waterways class IV where appropriate without preventing achievement of the environmental objectives of at least Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, and Directive 2009/147/EC of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds;
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – point b (b) where appropriate
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States and other project promoters shall make use of the integrated approach for planning inland waterway projects, especially when applying for (co-)financing under EU Programmes.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) the airport is of strategic importance for the region served.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – introductory part The comprehensive network shall keep up with state-of-the-art technological developments and deployments, including retrofitting of existing engines in order to achieve substantial reductions of emissions into the air. They shall in particular aim to:
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – point e a (new) (ea) promote measures to reduce noise at source;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – point g (g) improve resilience to
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – title Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters shall give due consideration to the risk assessments and adaptation measures adequately improving the resilience to
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) In order to improve infrastructure planning and identify possible repercussions on the Natura 2000 network, Member States and other project promoters shall use the Commission's TENtec system and Natura 2000 software.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The competent authorities in the Member States and other promoters of projects shall ensure that the legislation concerned – including that concerning public participation – is applied across borders. The Commission shall encourage efficient dialogue and cooperation between the competent authorities in the Member States, albeit naturally without increasing administrative burden.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States and other project promoters shall have regard to the EU's Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, with particular reference to Target 2 to maintain and restore ecosystems and their services. A no-net loss approach will be applied where possible.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular elderly people, persons of reduced mobility and disabled passengers. Member States and project promoters shall pay due attention to ensure that transport infrastructure is accessible to all users.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 1 – the development of rest areas a
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States concerned and, as appropriate, other public and private entities. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure shall participate in the corridor platform.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The corridor platform shall make use of instruments designed to ‘green’ transport along the corridor, by applying quantitative and qualitative indicators based on state-of-the-art research and international best practice, for the planning, implementation and monitoring of infrastructure development and transport.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 3 a (new) - a plan agreed with the regional and local authorities concerned for remediation works to facilitate acceptance of the infrastructure by local populations;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 3 a (new) - measures to establish public consultation procedures concerning the development of corridor projects of common interest, particularly when they affect cross-border sections. The coordinator shall ensure that an extensive public consultation process takes place with all stakeholders and civil society during the planning of new infrastructure. In any event, the coordinator may propose ways of developing the corridor plan and implementing it in a balanced manner.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 4 – risk assessment, including the possible impacts of
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I - part 16 - second map Inclusion in the core network High-speed (rail freight) line: Castejón - Logroño - Miranda
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I - part 17 - first map Inclusion in the core network: High-speed (passenger) line: Castejón - Logroño - Miranda
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I - part 17 - first map Inclusion in the comprehensive network Logroño Airport
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I - part 17 - second map Inclusion in the comprehensive network Logroño Airport
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I - part 17 - second map Inclusion in the comprehensive network Burgos - Logroño - Pamplona Motorway
source: PE-492.864
2012/07/11
IMCO
73 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Wherever appropriate, railway freight corridors set up in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the European Railway Traffic Management System (ERTMS) corridors should be a part of the core network corridors.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Based on the principle of the subsidiarity, the European Coordinator shall be designated only for those core network corridors, which require special assistance of the European Coordinator in order to ensure timely implementation of the corridor.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. For each core network corridor, the
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient, eco-efficient and socially sustainable way.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The comprehensive network should be a European-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility of all regions in the Union, including the remote and outermost regions, as also pursued by the Integrated Maritime Policy, and strengthening cohesion between them. The guidelines should set the requirements for the infrastructure of the comprehensive network, and efforts should be made in order to achieve a high-quality network throughout the Union by 2050.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The comprehensive network should be a European-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility of all regions in the Union, including the remote, island and outermost regions, as also pursued by the Integrated Maritime Policy, and strengthening economic and social cohesion between them. The guidelines should set the requirements for the infrastructure of the comprehensive network, in order to achieve a high-quality network throughout the Union by 2050.
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) The comprehensive network should take into account the specific problems of some Member States, such as sparsely populated areas without alternative local roads, and ensure that those problems are managed efficiently and in appropriate way. This would contribute to enabling all citizens to enjoy the free movement in the European Union.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The core network should be identified and
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In order to establish the core and the comprehensive network in a coordinated and timely manner, allowing thereby maximising the network benefits, Member States concerned should ensure that the projects of common interest are finalised
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In order to establish the core and the comprehensive network in a coordinated and timely manner, allowing thereby maximising the network benefits, Member States concerned should ensure that appropriate measures are taken in order to finalise the projects of common interest
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14 a) The Commission should monitor and assess whether Member States have taken all necessary measures to ensure that projects are carried out in accordance with the Union legislation, as well as to ascertain the correct implementation of this Regulation and the European added value of projects of common interest.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new) (15 a) This Regulation should not create additional administrative burdens to Member States, regional and local authorities, and all stakeholders involved in the development and the implementation of the TEN-T.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 a (new) (19 a) In order to make the most of the TEN-T guidelines in a comprehensive way, as well as to provide a better, more effective and accessible use for passengers, the Regulation should provide for the establishment of a Common European Passenger Transport Platform, offering standardized ways of travelling across Europe.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. The guidelines provide for measures for the implementation of the trans-European network, while recognising that the implementation of projects depends on their degree of maturity and the availability of financial resources, and not prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or the Union.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) meet the mobility and transport needs of all its users within the Union and in the relations with third countries
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) meet the mobility and transport needs of its users within the Union, and where appropriate, in the relations with third countries, thereby contributing to further economic growth and competitiveness;
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) promote the most advanced technological, eco-efficient and operational concepts
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) provide appropriate accessibility of all regions of the Union, thereby promoting social, economic and territorial cohesion and supporting
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) provide appropriate accessibility of all regions of the Union, including outermost, island and mountain regions, thereby promoting social, economic and territorial cohesion and supporting inclusive growth.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) emphasise that investment in sustainable transport systems must take into account the fact that women’s and men’s perception of public spaces is different and is based on different risk assessments, which means that safe environments in the transport system must be prioritised for both women and men.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) reduce the transport sector’s environmental and energy impacts and improve gender equality by working to increase access to IT systems and traffic- efficient planning.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new) (dc) introduce a transport hierarchy that clearly indicates which mode of transport should be prioritised for overall environmental and traffic targets to be achieved.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f (f)
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage of European regions, including outermost regions, a
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) measures to ensure that the objectives of social and environmental sustainability are always met.
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The comprehensive network shall be made up of all existing and planned transport infrastructures of the trans- European transport network as well as measures promoting the eco-efficient use of such infrastructure. It shall be developed
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission shall monitor and assess whether Member States have taken all necessary measures to ensure that projects are carried out in accordance with the Union legislation.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) demonstrate clear European added value from a social, ecological and environmentally friendly perspective.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) recognise the physical and geographical constraints affecting transport infrastructures in the Member States as referred to by the Technical Standards for Interoperability.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) implementing and deploying intelligent transport systems, including measures which enable traffic management, multimodal scheduling and information services, multimodal tracking and tracing, capacity planning and consumer friendly online reservation and integrated ticketing services;
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) ensuring that specific problems of some Member States, such as sparsely populated areas without alternative local roads, are taken into account and managed in appropriate and efficient way;
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) (e b) guaranteeing to citizens that the planning process of the TEN-T will respect their concerns.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) ensuring fuel security by
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) compliance with infrastructural standards and enhanced interoperability.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class I
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall give particular consideration to the following aspects, having in mind the economic implications:
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for existing inland waterways: implementing measures necessary to reach the standards of the inland waterways class I
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where appropriate, achieving higher standards than inland waterways class I
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. The high quality roads referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 are those which play an important role in long-distance freight and passenger traffic, integrate the main urban and economic centres, interconnect with other transport modes and link mountain, remote, landlocked and peripheral NUTS 2 regions to central regions of the Union.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall give particular consideration to the following aspects, having in mind the economic implications:
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans-European transport network may also include activities that have wider benefits and are not linked to specific ports, such as activities for improving the environmental performance of carriers and infrastructures, making available facilities for ice-breaking, activities ensuring year- round navigability, dredging operations, alternative fuelling facilities, as well as the optimisation of processes, procedures and
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall give particular consideration to the following aspects, having in mind the economic implications:
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall give particular consideration to the following aspects, having in mind the economic implications:
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) plans based on sustainability and climate-enhancing measures;
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) strengthening local public transport.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall give particular consideration to the following aspects, having in mind the economic implications:
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when developing the comprehensive network in urban nodes shall, where feasible, aim to ensure:
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) bypassing of urban areas for rail freight and passenger transport
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) promote the switchover from fossil- based transport to environmentally friendly transport.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) promote efficient ways to provide accessible and comprehensible information to all citizens regarding interconnections, interoperability and multimodality;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 a (new) Article 39 a Establishment of a Common European Passenger Transport Platform A Common European Passenger Transport Platform shall be established taking into account the most effective practices in Member States in this area. The Common European Passenger Transport Platform should: (a) offer passengers accessible and comprehensive information regarding their cross border travels, including interconnections, interoperability and multimodality; (b) provide a standardized way of ticket issuing and invoicing, enabling passengers to use a single ticket concerning their whole travel across different Member States and including all means of transport. (c) offer a common system for complaints enabling consumers to alert travel operators from other EU Member States to the problems occurred.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular elderly people, persons of reduced mobility and disabled passengers. Transport infrastructure should also be geographically balanced and take into account sparsely populated areas and areas difficult to access.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans- European transport network policy. The core network shall in particular contribute to coping with increasing mobility
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 – availability of
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 – availability of alternative clean fuels at competitive prices;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 1 – the development of rest areas approximately every 50 kilometres on motorways in order inter alia to provide sufficient parking space for commercial road users with an
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 2 – availability of
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 2 – availability of alternative clean fuels at competitive prices;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Article 1(4), 47(2) and (3),
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 2. Maritime ports indicated in Part 2 of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 3. The main airports indicated in Part 1b of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2050
source: PE-492.888
2012/07/19
REGI
43 amendments...
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. This situation is encountered in particular in new Member States because of underdeveloped infrastructure. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans- European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The outermost regions still need urgently to optimise their accessibility, especially as regards air links to the European mainland and the carriage of passengers and goods by sea, since this is the only way for them integrate more fully into the internal market.
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements for the core network should be possible in duly justified cases. This should include cases where investments cannot be justified.
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In order to make sure that the Union’s island regions are fully accessible and enjoy the benefits of inclusive growth and territorial cohesion, additional criteria such as surface area and population should be laid down for the purpose of identifying the core network, in order to include at least one port or airport for each island.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Projects of common interest should demonstrate a clear European added value. Cross-border projects typically have high European added value,
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Intelligent transport systems are necessary to provide the basis for optimising of traffic and transport operations and improving related services, as well as helping to improve traffic safety and the safety of transport operations.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) The trans-European transport network, thanks to its large scale, should provide the basis for the large-scale deployment of new technologies and innovation, which, for example, can help enhance the overall efficiency of the European transport sector, increase transport safety and security and curb its carbon footprint. This will contribute towards the Europe 2020 strategy and the Transport White Paper's target of a 60% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 (based on 1990 levels) and at the same time contribute to the objective of increasing fuel security for the Union.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the economic, social and environmental impact on regions in which the respective infrastructure projects are located, and the impact of climate change and of potential natural and man-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the impact of climate change and of potential natural and man-made disasters on infrastructure
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) The core network should be a subset of the comprehensive network overlaying it. It should represent the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans- European transport network, according to traffic needs and the economic and social needs of the regions and countries in which they are located. It should be multi- modal, i.e. include all transport modes and their connections as well as relevant traffic and information management systems.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Designing the right governance structure and identifying the sources of financing for complex cross-border projects, through public investment and by attracting private capital, would be eased by creating corridor platforms for such core network corridors. European Coordinators should facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network corridors.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) provide appropriate accessibility of all regions of the Union, thereby promoting social, economic and territorial cohesion and supporting inclusive growth, including by reducing interregional transport infrastructure disparities.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage of all European regions, including regions of the new Member States, outermost regions and other peripheral ones;
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage and connection of European regions, including mountainous, outermost regions and other peripheral ones;
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage of European regions, including outermost
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) improvement and maintenance of existing transport infrastructure or rebuilding of transport infrastructure which has deteriorated;
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Union, Member States, regions and local authorities located on the TENs, infrastructure managers and other project promoters, when developing the comprehensive network, shall give particular consideration to measures that are necessary for:
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, notably in cross-border sections and in urban areas;
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. Within the sphere of their responsibility, Member States, port operators and infrastructure managers shall ensure that inland ports
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class I
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) rivers, canals and lakes are equipped with RIS, where applicable.
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for existing inland waterways: implementing measures necessary to reach the standards of the inland waterways class
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where appropriate, achieving higher standards than inland waterways class I
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. High-quality roads shall be specially designed and built for motor traffic, and shall be either motorways
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) A conventional strategic road is a road which is not a motorway or an express road but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2. Conventional strategic roads shall be managed and financed in line with the specificities of an individual Member State.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) support for the development of regional airports, with a view to increasing interconnections, decongesting passenger air traffic, and diversifying flight destinations.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) ensuring that all aspects – economic, social and environmental – are taken into consideration when a prioritisation is decided between freight and passenger transport on the TEN-T.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 – availability of alternative clean fuels
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 47
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The methodology used to identify core network nodes shall take account of surface area and population, so as to include at least one port or airport for each island.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 1. Core network corridors are an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network. Core network corridors shall be based on modal integration, interoperability, as well as on a coordinated development and management of infrastructure, in order to lead to resource-efficient multimodal transport. The infrastructure of the core network corridors shall be developed in such a way as to make bottleneck-free national and cross-border use possible and bring about sustainable environmental improvements.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) report to the Member States, to the European Parliament, to the Commission and, as appropriate, to all other entities directly involved in the development of the core network corridor on any difficulties encountered and contribute to finding appropriate solutions;
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) report to the Member States, to the Commission and
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 1. For each core network corridor, the
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and, as appropriate, other public and private entities, as well as third countries in case of trans-border projects. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure shall participate in the corridor platform.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I, Volume 18/33 Include the port of Olbia among the maritime ports in the core network in Annex I;
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I, Volume 18/33 Include the port of Cagliari among the maritime ports in the core network in Annex I;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I, Volume 02/33 Include the Oder Waterway (Ostrawa – Opole – Wrocław – Frankfurt nad Odrą – Szczecin) in the core network;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I, Volumes 05/33, 15/33, 21/33 and 23/32 Include the whole Via Carpathia Road (Thessaloniki, Sofia, Calfat, Lugoj, Timişoara, Oradea, Debrecen, Miskolc, Košice, Rzeszów, Lublin, Białystok, Kaunas, Klaip÷da) in the core network;
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II, Volume 24/33, point 2 Include the port of Olbia among the maritime ports in the core network in point 2 of Annex II;
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II, Volume 24/33, point 2 Include the port of Cagliari among the maritime ports in the core network in point 2 of Annex II;
source: PE-494.544
2012/10/04
TRAN
341 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network policy has to take into account the evolution of the transport policy and infrastructure ownership. In the past, Member States were the principal entity in charge of creating and maintaining transport infrastructure. However, according to the policy choices of some Member States, other entities, including private partners, have also become relevant for the realisation of a multimodal trans-European transport network
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) The trans-European transport network should be developed through the creation of new transport infrastructure, revitalisation and upgrading of existing infrastructure and through measures promoting its resource-efficient use.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The trans-European transport network should
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) The trans-European transport network should
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The comprehensive network should be a European-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility of all regions in the Union, including the remote and outermost regions, as also pursued by the Integrated Maritime Policy, and strengthening cohesion between them. The guidelines should set the requirements for the infrastructure of the comprehensive network, in order to
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The comprehensive network should be a European-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility of all regions in the Union, including
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) The comprehensive network should be a European-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility of all regions in the Union, including the remote and outermost regions, as also pursued by the Integrated Maritime Policy, and strengthening
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The core network should be identified and
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The core network should be identified and implemented as a priority within the framework provided by the comprehensive network by 2030. It should constitute the backbone of the development of a multi- modal transport network and stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network. It should enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross-border sections, missing links, last- mile connections, multi-
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) The core network should be identified and
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) When carrying out the review of the implementation of the core network by 2023, the Commission should take into account national implementation plans and future enlargements.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In its review of the implementation of the core network by 2023 the Commission should also take into account the national implementation plans and new EU enlargements.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) The planning stage of a project must be carried out using objective, transparent criteria and ought to take into account the interests and responsibilities of local and regional authorities as well as of the local community affected by a project of common interest.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) When carrying out the review of the implementation of the core network by 2023, the Commission should take into account national implementation plans and future enlargements.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements for the core network should be possible in duly justified cases. This should include cases where investments cannot be justified.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements for the core network should be possible in duly justified cases.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 b (new) (11 b) The particular situation of isolated or partially isolated rail networks should be recognised by way of exemptions from certain infrastructure requirements.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 c (new) (11 c) When carrying out the review of the implementation of the core network by 2023, the Commission should take into account national implementation plans and future enlargements.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 d (new) (11 d) The trans-European transport network covers only part of the existing transport networks. In the framework of the revision by 2023, the Commission should evaluate in cooperation with the Member States concerned whether other parts, such as certain class III inland waterways, should be integrated into the network.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) In order to establish the core
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) It is necessary to identify projects of common interest which will contribute to the a
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) It is necessary to identify projects of common interest which will contribute to
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) It is necessary to identify projects of common interest which will contribute to the achievement of the trans-European transport network and which corresponds to the priorities established in the guidelines. Their implementation should depend on their degree of maturity, the compliance with national and EU legal procedures, and the availability of financial resources, without prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or the Union.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Projects of common interest should demonstrate
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Projects of common interest should demonstrate a clear European added value, by enhancing interconnections between Member States and improving the fluidity, speed and sustainability of transport flows throughout the European Union. Cross- border projects typically have high European added value
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) Furthermore, projects of common interest should be subject to a socio- economic cost benefit analysis and have European added value that is tailored to the trans-European transport networks and takes account of all the social, economic, environmental and territorial costs and benefits. The results of this analysis should demonstrate a positive net present value.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) In order for infrastructure projects to be carried out and for a success to be made of them, it is of immense importance to foster general acceptance on the part of local residents. The interests of regional and local authorities as well as of local civil society affected by a project of common interest should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phases of a project.
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 a (new) (14a) With a view to developing a trans- European transport network which is respectful of the environment and territories as a whole, impacts in terms of soil and air pollution, biodiversity protection and noise pollution should be assessed in detail when infrastructure is built or developed.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Some parts of the network are managed by other actors than Member States. As the development and implementation of the trans-European transport network
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Cooperation with neighbouring and third countries is necessary to ensure connection and interoperability between the respective infrastructure networks. Therefore the Union should, where appropriate, promote projects of mutual interest with those countries, giving priority to projects with countries undergoing the accession process to join the Union, candidate countries and potential candidates, so that they can integrate more rapidly within the Union. These projects should seek to develop the trans-European transport network by avoiding traffic congestion on existing infrastructure and ensuring a balanced growth of the network, which should include improved integration of logistics and connections in the Mediterranean area, with a view to giving that area a key role once again.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) The guidelines should set priorities in order to
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Intelligent transport systems are necessary to provide the basis for optimising of traffic and transport operations and improving related services. They should be interoperable and must be deployed widely across transport modes, Member States, and regions, in order to maximise benefits for the internal market, sustainable growth and cohesion.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The guidelines should provide for the development of the comprehensive network in urban nodes, in accordance with Union aims regarding Sustainable Urban Mobility, as those nodes are the starting point or the final destination (‘last mile’) for passengers and freight moving on the trans-European transport network and are points of transfer within or between different transport modes.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The trans-European transport network has to ensure efficient multi-modality in order to allow better modal choices to be made for passengers and freight and large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. This will make multi- modality economically more attractive for shippers and users.
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The trans-European transport network has to ensure efficient multi-modality in order to allow better modal choices to be made and large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. Investments in multi-modal transhipment facilities will streamline transportation and provide for long-term benefits for the environment. This will also make multi- modality economically more attractive for shippers.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The trans-European transport network has to ensure efficient multi-modality by giving priority to the most environmentally- friendly and sustainable modes of transport in order to allow better modal choices to be made and large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. This will make multi- modality economically more attractive for shippers and sustainable for the well being of all citizens.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The trans-European transport network has to ensure efficient multi-modality in order to allow better modal choices to be made and large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. This will make multi-modality economically more attractive for
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the impact of climate change and of potential natural and man-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users, including persons with reduced mobility.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes the guidelines should contain provisions regarding the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the impact on and of climate change and of potential natural and man-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) The core network should be a subset of the comprehensive network overlaying it. It should represent the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans- European transport network, according to traffic needs, and it should guarantee seamless mobility and accessibility in all the Union's regions. It should be multi- modal, i.e. include all transport modes and their connections as well as relevant traffic and information management systems.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) The core network should be a subset of the comprehensive network overlaying it. It should represent the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans- European transport network, according to the development of an overall low carbon economy in the EU, including traffic needs. It should be multi-modal, i.e. include all transport modes and their connections as well as relevant traffic and information management systems.
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) The core network has been identified on the basis of an objective planning methodology. This methodology has identified the most important urban nodes, ports, airports and border crossing points. These nodes are connected via multimodal links, wherever possible, and are economically viable, environmentally sustainable and feasible until 2030. The methodology has ensured the connection of all Member States and the integration of the main islands and outlying areas into the core network.
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25 a) The core network has been identified on the basis of an objective planning methodology. This methodology has identified the most important urban nodes, ports, airports as well as border crossing points. Wherever possible, these nodes are connected with multimodal links as long as they are economically viable, environmentally sustainable and feasible until 2030. The methodology has ensured the connection of all Member States and the integration of the main islands into the core network.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In order to implement the core network within the given time horizon, a corridor approach could be used, focusing on the corridors with the heaviest traffic, as an instrument to coordinate on a transnational basis different projects and synchronise the development of the corridor, thereby maximising network benefits.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In order to implement the core network within the given time horizon, a corridor approach could be used as an instrument to coordinate on a transnational basis different projects and synchronise the development of the corridor, thereby maximising network benefits. The corridor approach should not lead to prioritisation of certain projects over others on the core network.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In order to implement the core network within the given time horizon, a corridor approach could be used as an instrument to coordinate on a transnational basis different projects and synchronise the development of the corridor, thereby maximising network benefits. Therefore this instrument should provide prioritisation of corridor projects over other projects of the core network, in cases when the implementation of core network projects, due to financial or administrative constraints, notably reduces the possibilities for a corridor project to be implemented.
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In order to implement the core network within the given time horizon, a corridor approach could be used as an instrument to coordinate on a transnational basis different projects and synchronise the development of the corridors and their interconnection, thereby maximising network benefits.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) In order to implement the core
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating and administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included in the Regulation (EU) XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], but should be adaptable in order to take account of changes in traffic flows. Based on this list, the core network corridors shall be illustrated by a schematic indicative map contained in Annex I of this Regulation.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating and administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included in the Regulation (EU) XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], but should be adaptable in order to take account of changes in traffic flows and increase the accessibility of all the EU regions.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability,
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating and administrative costs. Their management should not, however, result in an excessive growth of administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts and increasing competitiveness, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating and administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included in the Regulation (EU) XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], but should be adaptable in order to take account of changes in traffic flows. Based on this list, the core network corridors should be shown on maps contained in Annex I to this Regulation.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Core network corridors
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Designing the right governance structure and identifying the sources of financing for complex cross-border projects would be eased by creating corridor platforms for such core network corridors. European Coordinators should facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network corridors and their interconnection.
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28)
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Designing the right governance structure and identifying the sources of financing for complex cross-border projects would be, where appropriate, eased by creating corridor platforms for such core network corridors. European Coordinators should facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network corridors.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) (28 a) The corridor approach should be transparent and clear. It should not create extra administrative burdens.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) In developing core network corridors due account should be given to the rail freight corridors set up in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of 22 September 2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning a European rail network for competitive freight
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29)
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) In developing core network corridors due
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) In developing core network corridors due account should be given to the rail freight corridors set up in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of 22 September 2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning a European rail network for competitive freight as well as to the European Deployment Plan for ERTMS provided for in Commission Decision 2009/561/EC of 22 July 2009 amending Decision 2006/679/EC as regards the implementation of the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system as well as to the 'green corridors'.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 (29) In developing core network corridors
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) (29 a) In order to increase the capacity and efficiency of rail transport on lines which are used by conventional freight trains, the standardisation of the minimum train length should be 750m. On the core network further extension to 1500m should be considered if economical, operational and technical feasibility allows it. Wherever an increase of the train length to 1000m can lead to productivity gains, this should be encouraged as a positive first step on the core network.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) (29a) If the objective of a European transport policy which provides EU citizens with a unified, multi-modal and interconnected network is to be achieved, support should be given to the completion of all the projects within the time horizon proposed here. With that aim in view, the projects intended to adapt transport networks in urban centres should be supported and promoted by the coordinator of the closest corridor. This will make for effective interconnection between corridors and clear the way for the completion of the core network within the given time horizon.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should be based on this Regulation and draw on the Connecting Europe Facility. Correspondingly, it should aim at aligning and combining funding from relevant internal and external instruments such as structural and cohesion funds, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), and from financing from the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other financial institutions. In particular, when developing the trans-European transport network, Member States should take into account
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should be based on this Regulation and draw on the Connecting Europe Facility. Correspondingly, it should aim at aligning and combining funding from relevant internal and external instruments such as structural and cohesion funds, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), and from financing from the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other financial institutions.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should be based on this Regulation and draw on the Connecting Europe Facility. Correspondingly, it should aim at aligning and combining funding from relevant internal and external instruments such as structural and cohesion funds, the Neighbourhood Investment Facility (NIF), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA), and from financing from the European Investment Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and other financial institutions. In particular, when developing the trans-European transport network, Member States should take into account to the ex ante conditionalities applicable to transport as provided for in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No XXX2012 [Regulation laying down common provisions on the European Regional
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 a (new) (30a) In order to guarantee that the financing policy for all financial programmes is transparent and is carried out in line with the objectives and priorities outlined in the TEN-T guidelines, detailed statistics need to be regularly compiled, processed and published on all relevant financial aid in the form of subsidies, loans or other financial instruments used for each project of common interest and for each mode of transport, as well as the results obtained in each project, in both the core and comprehensive networks at European level and from the respective Member States.
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) In order to update the Annexes and in particular the maps to take into account possible changes resulting from the actual usage of certain elements of transport infrastructure analysed against pre- established quantitative thresholds, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the Annexes. It is of particular importance for the Commission to carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including locally and at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing- up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) In order to update the Annexes and in particular the maps to take into account possible changes resulting from the actual usage of certain elements of transport infrastructure analysed against pre- established quantitative thresholds, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the Annexes. It is of particular importance for the Commission to carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) In order to update the
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 a (new) (31 a) When carrying out the review of the implementation of the core network in 2023, the Commission shall evaluate, in consultation with the Member States, the inclusion of other parts in the network, especially the priority projects included in the Decision 661/2010/EU, on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes the Union guidelines (hereinafter ‘the guidelines’) for the development of a trans-European transport network
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 1. This Regulation establishes
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. The guidelines specify the requirements
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 2 2. The guidelines specify the requirements to be respected by the
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. The guidelines provide for measures for the implementation of the trans-European network. The implementation of projects of common interest depends on their degree of maturity, the compliance with national and EU legal procedures and the availability of financial resources, without prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or the Union.
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. The guidelines provide for measures for the implementation of the trans-European network.
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. The guidelines provide for measures
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 4 4. The guidelines provide for measures for the implementation of the trans-European network. The implementation of projects of common interest depends on their degree of maturity, the compliance with national and EU legal procedures and the availability of financial resources, without prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or the Union.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – measures promoting the efficient management and use of such infrastructure and enabling sustainable and efficient transport services.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Transport infrastructure of the trans- European transport network comprises primarily cross-border sections and consists of:
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) railway transport infrastructure as determined in Section 1 of Chapter II and, for the sole purpose of accessibility to the trans-European transport network, the infrastructure of other rail-based systems;
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 – point g a (new) (ga) a transport infrastructure which reflects the specific situations in various parts of the Union and provides a balanced coverage of the Union regions, including the outermost and other remote regions, also with a view to the accession of Croatia to the Union in 2013 and, subsequently, that of other candidate countries and potential candidates;
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ‘project of common interest’ means any p
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) 'Interoperability for systems' is the capacity of systems and the underlying business processes to exchange data and to share information and knowledge;
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) ‘European added value’ means, in
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) ‘European added value’ means, in relation to a project, the value resulting from Union intervention which is additional to the value that would otherwise have been created by Member State action alone, leading to a net reduction of greenhouse gas emissions compared to baseline year 1990 and focusing on cross-border connections that have been cut or abandoned since the end of the Second World War;
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'European added value' means, in relation to a project, the value resulting from Union intervention
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) ‘European added value’ means, in relation to a project, the economic, social and environmental value resulting from Union intervention which is additional to the value that would otherwise have been created by Member State action alone;
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) ‘European added value’ means, in
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point g (g) 'intelligent transport systems (ITS)' mean systems using information, communication, navigation and positioning/localization technologies in order to manage infrastructure, mobility and traffic on the trans-European transport network and to provide value added services to citizens and operators, including for safe, secure, environmentally sound and capacity efficient use of the network.
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) ‘e Maritime services’ means services
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) 'transport mode' means railway and other rail-based systems, inland waterways, road, maritime or air transport;
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new) (n a) 'interoperability' means the ability of a transport mode to allow the safe and uninterrupted movement of its vehicles in order to meet its required levels of performance. This ability depends on all the technical, operational and regulatory conditions under which the respective transport mode operates. It may include innovative solutions that improve the compatibility among the different systems, such as on-board equipment and multigauge tracks;
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point n a (new) (na) 'interconnection of transport modes' means the physical linking of a transport mode and/or its network with equipment or facilities belonging to another transport mode or network;
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘urban node’ means an urban area
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘urban node’ means an urban area where the transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, such as ports, airports, logistic platforms, freight and passenger terminals located in and around an urban area is connected with other parts of that infrastructure and with the infrastructure for regional and local traffic;
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) 'urban node' means an urban area
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) 'urban node' means an urban area
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o a (new) (o a) 'cross-border section' means the connection between the nearest nodes on both sides of the border;
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o b (new) (o b)'bottleneck' means a physical, operational or organisational barrier that interrupts the continuity of transport flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed primarily by a more efficient use or the upgrading and rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. If this proves insufficient, new infrastructure may have to be built;
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q (q)
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ‘freight terminal’ means a structure equipped for transhipment between at least two transport modes or between two different rail systems and for temporary storage of freight such as ports, inland ports, airports and rail-road terminals;
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q a (new) (q a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (ra) 'interconnection' means an infrastructure element or system which enables a transport connection to be made between two or more items of trans- European transport network infrastructure, terminals or nodes;
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (ra) ‘socio-economic cost-benefit analysis’ means a quantified ex-ante evaluation on the basis of a harmonised methodology of the value of a project or programme, taking into account all the social and economic benefits and costs and the climate, environmental and territorial impact, and serving as an indicator of contribution to wellbeing;
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'revitalisation' means a process resulting in the achievement of the original construction parameters of existing infrastructure facilities with the long term improvement of its quality compared to the current state, in line with the application of the requirements and the provisions of this Regulation;
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point r a (new) (ra) 'socio-economic cost-benefit analysis' means a quantified ex-ante evaluation on the basis of a harmonised methodology of the value of a project or programme, including an overall environmental impact assessment, taking into account all social, economic and environmental costs and benefits, and serving as an indicator of contribution to well-being;
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'border crossing point' means the infrastructure necessary to ensure seamless traffic flow, border checks, border surveillance and other border control procedures;
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'bottleneck' means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure and/or upgrading or modernising of existing infrastructure;
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new) (r a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge which is different to that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location;
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new) (rb) ‘climate impact’ means the greenhouse gas effects of existing, new or modernised transport infrastructure on the basis of a harmonised methodology that includes: 1. – the situation with regard to greenhouse gas emissions from traffic and infrastructure operation, maintenance and management; 2. – the development of greenhouse gas emissions from construction or modernisation processes.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new) (r b) 'climate impact assessment' means an ex-ante evaluation of the absolute and relative greenhouse gas impacts of new, extended or upgraded transport infrastructure on the basis of a harmonised methodology, publicly accessible by citizens in accordance with the Aarhus Convention, comprising: 1. changes in greenhouse gas emissions from traffic; 2. changes in greenhouse gas emissions from infrastructure operation, maintenance and management; 3. greenhouse gas emissions from infrastructure construction, development and end-of-life processes; 4. indirect effects on other sectors;
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new) (r b) 'cross border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest between at least two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country;
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new) (rb) 'interoperability' means the ability of a rail system to allow the safe and uninterrupted movement of trains which accomplish the required levels of performance for these lines. This ability depends on all the regulatory, technical and operational conditions which must be met in order to satisfy the essential requirements;
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r c (new) (rc) 'integration' means an infrastructure or technological measure to supplement or improve the performance of the trans- European transport network in functional terms, also by expanding the mobility and transport catchment area;
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) (1a) 'alternative clean fuels' mean fuels which substitute conventional motor fuels like gasoline and diesel in the energy supply for transport and contribute to its decarbonisation; they include electricity, hydrogen, biofuels (liquids), synthetic fuels, methane (natural gas and biomethane) and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) meet the mobility and transport needs of all its users within the Union and in the relations with third countries, thereby contributing to further economic growth and competitiveness and enhance social cohesion;
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) meet the mobility and transport needs of its users within the Union and in the relations with third countries, thereby contributing to further economic growth, territorial cohesion and competitiveness;
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are economically efficient, contribute to the objectives of low-carbon and clean transport, fuel security and environmental protection in accordance with the criteria laid down in Article 3(ra), are safe and secure and have high quality standards, both for passenger and freight transport;
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are economically efficient, contribute to the objectives of low-carbon and clean
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensure that all regions have at least two fast access routes connecting them to the network, offer solutions that are economically efficient, contribute to the objectives of low-carbon and clean transport, fuel security and environmental protection, are safe and secure and have high quality standards, both for passenger and freight transport;
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are economically efficient, demonstrate a quantified contribut
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) lead to a modal shift in order to minimise all environmental and social costs, including greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutants, noise pollution, water and soil contamination, and to protect biodiversity, habitats and health;
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) promote t
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) promote the most advanced technological and operational concepts broadly across transport modes and Member States;
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) provide
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) contribute to a shift towards the transport modes which are the cleanest and most sustainable in terms of social cohesion and respect for the environment;
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) first and foremost, the interconnection and interoperability of national transport networks while concentrating resources on cross-border sections that have been abandoned or cut since the end of the Second World War and giving priority to the upgrading or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the interconnection and interoperability of regional and national transport networks;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the development of all transport modes
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) the development
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) the efficient use of existing infrastructure as a priority ahead of the consideration of any new build projects;
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) promotion of a broad use of transport with the most carbon neutral effect, while minimising future external costs;
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) promotion of
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f (f) promotion of
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point h Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point h (h) the establishment of infrastructure requirements, notably in the field of interoperability, safety and security, which will benchmark quality, efficiency and sustainability in line with the positive socio-economic benefits of transport services;
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i (i) for both passenger and freight traffic, seamless connections between transport infrastructure for long-distance traffic
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point i (i) for both passenger and freight traffic, seamless connections between transport infrastructure for long-distance traffic on the one hand, and regional and local traffic on the other, including soft mobility options such as cycling and walking;
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that reflects the specific situations in different parts of the Union and provides for a balanced coverage of European regions, including outermost
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point j (j) a transport infrastructure that
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point k (k)
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Resource efficient network and special circumstances
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) an optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection, while focusing efforts and concentrating resources on cross-border sections that have been abandoned or cut since the end of the Second World War. Priority should be given to the upgrading or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure;
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the broad deployment of new technologies and ITS, where it is economically justified;
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the broad deployment of new technologies and ITS in order to ensure efficient use of existing infrastructure as a priority ahead of capacity-increase or new build projects;
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) an optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection;
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) improvement and maintenance of existing transport infrastructure, including demand-management measures;
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) development, improvement and maintenance of existing transport infrastructure;
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the assessment of strategic environmental impact, with the establishment of appropriate plans and programmes and of impacts on climate mitigation, ensuring special and fast-track procedures for projects of common interest;
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the assessment of
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the assessment of strategic environmental impact,
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) adequate consideration of the vulnerability of transport infrastructure with regard to a changing climate as well as natural and man-made disasters, in order to adapt infrastructure to cope with these challenges.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) promotion of sustainable and efficient transport services.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The gradual development of the trans- European transport network shall in particular be achieved by implementing a dual-layer structure for this network with a coherent and transparent methodological approach, comprising a comprehensive network and a core network.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Projects of common interest shall
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Projects of common interest shall contribute to the development of the trans- European transport network through the creation of new transport infrastructure, the maintenance, rehabilitation and upgrading of existing transport infrastructure and through measures promoting its
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. Projects of common interest shall contribute to the development of the trans- European transport network through
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contribute to the applying objectives set out in Article 4;
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contribute to all the objectives set out in Article 4 and 5;
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) have been subject to a socio-economic cost benefit analysis in accordance with Article 3(ra) resulting in a positive net present value;
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) have been subject to a socio-economic cost benefit analysis resulting in a positive net present value, based on independently- verified traffic forecast data;
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d (d)
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Member States and other project promoters shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the projects are carried out in compliance with relevant Union
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. Member States and other project promoters shall take all necessary measures to ensure that the projects are carried out in compliance with relevant Union and national rules and procedures, in particular with Union legislation on the environment, concerned population consultation, climate protection, safety, security, competition, state aid, public procurement and public health.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Projects of common interest fulfil the 'Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest' (IROPI or similar) criteria.
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 5 5. Projects of common interest are eligible for Union financial aid under the instruments available for the trans- European transport network, in
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) ensure the connection between the core network and the transport networks of the third countries, aiming at enhanced economic growth and competitiveness;
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d (d) implement traffic management systems in those countries
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) improve economic, cultural and social links and competitiveness opportunities.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) facilitate inland waterways, maritime transport and promote motorways of the sea with third countries.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. With a view to the accession of Croatia to the Union in 2013 and the negotiations under way with other candidate countries and potential candidates, the Union shall promote, as a matter of priority, projects of common interest and projects of mutual interest that concern the Mediterranean cross-border area. The key aims of these projects shall be to relieve traffic pressure on existing infrastructure and to ensure a balanced development of the priority projects, in synergy with the development of cohesion policy which seeks to achieve an overall territorial balance.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) recognise the physical limitations of Member States transport infrastructures, as identified in Technical Standards for Interoperability.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Member States shall ensure that the comprehensive network is completed and fully complies with the relevant provisions of this Chapter by 31 December 2050 at the latest. To this end, it would be desirable for ‘programme contracts’ to be signed between the European Union, each Member State and the regions concerned.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3. The Member States shall ensure that the comprehensive network is completed and fully complies with the relevant provisions of this Chapter by 31 December 2050 at the latest. An exception applies to buildings which have a lifetime of up to 100 years and were built before the implementation of this Directive.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Efforts shall be made to complete the comprehensive network and comply with the relevant provisions of this Chapter by 31 December 2050.
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Union, Member States, regions and local authorities located on the TENs, infrastructure managers and other project promoters, when developing the comprehensive network, shall give particular consideration to measures that are necessary for:
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Union, Member States, infrastructure managers and other project promoters, when developing the comprehensive network, shall give p
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) implementing and deploying intelligent transport systems, including measures which enable traffic management, multimodal scheduling and information services, multimodal tracking and tracing, capacity planning and online reservation and a common integrated ticketing services;
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) implementing and deploying intelligent transport systems
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks,
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) bridging missing links
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, notably in cross-border sections and in the remote and outermost regions;
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) as a priority, bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, notably in cross-border sections (for example between Luxembourg and Germany);
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, notably in cross-border sections that have been abandoned or cut since the end of the Second World War, while giving priority to the rehabilitation or upgrading of existing infrastructure;
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) serving the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transport by 60% below 1990 levels by 2050;
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ensuring
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) In the specific case of island, remote and outermost regions, provide, when their geographical configuration so requires, a dense and sustainable network of links between them in their geographical area;
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) improving or maintaining the quality of infrastructure in terms of efficiency, safety, security, climate and
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting state-of-the-art technological innovation and development;
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) ensuring fuel security
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) ensuring fuel security by
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i (i)
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) mitigating exposure of urban areas to negative effects of rail and road transport;
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) internalise external costs;
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) removing administrative and technical barriers, in particular to the interoperability of the network and to competition;
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 1 – title Rail
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Rail
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) freight terminals
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) stations along the lines indicated in Annex I for the barrier-free access and transfer of passengers within the rail mode and between rail and other transport modes;
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) associated equipment, improving safety issues and mitigating adverse environmental impacts;
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) rail-based transport systems for interconnection;
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Railway lines and rail-based systems shall take one of the following forms:
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) rail-based systems for mass passenger transport;
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The technical equipment associated with railway lines
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The technical equipment associated with railway lines shall include electrification systems, equipment for the boarding and alighting of passengers and the loading and unloading of cargo in stations, logistic platforms and freight terminals. It shall include any facility necessary to ensure the safe, secure and efficient operation of vehicles, including their reduced impact on the environment.
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The technical equipment associated with railway lines and other rail-based systems shall include electrification systems, equipment for the boarding and alighting of passengers and the loading and unloading of cargo in stations, logistic platforms and freight terminals. It shall include any facility necessary to ensure the safe, secure and efficient operation of vehicles.
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Operators of freight terminals shall ensure that any freight terminal is open to all operators in line with the provisions of the recast of the first railway package.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. Operators of passenger stations shall ensure that passenger stations provide access to information
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 2. Operators of passenger stations shall ensure that passenger stations provide access for all users (in particular elderly people, persons with reduced mobility and disabled passengers) to information, ticketing and commercial activities for railway traffic throughout the comprehensive network and where appropriate information on connection with local and regional transport, in accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 454/2011 of 5 May 2011 on the technical specification for interoperability relating to the subsystem ‘telematics applications for passenger services’ of the trans-European rail system.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Within the sphere of their responsibility, Member States, relevant regional authorities and infrastructure managers shall ensure that:
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) railway lines are equipped with ERTMS, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) railway lines are equipped with ERTMS, or systems interoperable with ERTMS;
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) railway lines
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) railway lines are equipped with ERTMS, except in duly justified cases, where allowed by the relevant TSI;
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) railway lines are equipped with ERTMS, following the economic cost- benefit analysis;
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The access to freight terminals complies with the requirements provided for in Directive 2001/14/EC.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the following requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC for new and upgraded lines, except in duly justified cases, where allowed by the relevant TSI or under the procedure provided for in Article 9 of Directive 2008/57/EC
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC for new and upgraded lines, except in duly justified cases, where allowed by the relevant TSI or under the procedure provided for in Article 9 of Directive 2008/57/EC
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 (1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 (1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except for isolated networks;
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 (1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except for isolated networks;
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 (1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except for isolated railway networks;
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1 (1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm, except for isolated railway networks;
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, with the exception of sidings and terminals;
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, excluding sidings;
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, with the exception of sidings and terminals;
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, excluding sidings;
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2 (2) electrification, with the exception of branch lines and terminals;
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 (3) lines which are used by conventional freight trains: 22,5 t axle load, and 750 m train length, except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 (3) lines which are used by conventional freight trains: 22,5 t axle load,
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 (3) lines which are used by conventional freight trains: 22,5 t axle load, and 7
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3 – footnote 41 Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – subpoint 4 Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – subpoint 4 Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – subpoint 4 Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – subpoint 4 (4) maximum gradients for new lines
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3– point c – subpoint 4 – footnote 42 Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 4 a (new) (4 a) the access to freight terminals complies with the requirements provided for in Directive 2001/14/EC.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) migrating to 1 435 mm nominal track gauge;
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) migrating to 1 435 mm nominal track gauge;
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) mitigating the
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) preventing noise and mitigating
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) connecting railway transport infrastructure to inland port infrastructure.
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) connecting railway transport infrastructure to inland port infrastructure.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) connecting railway transport infrastructure with inland waterway port infrastructure;
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Inland waterways and inland ports which form part of the comprehensive network are indicated on the maps in Annex I. Inland ports which form part of the core network are included in the list in Annex II a to this Regulation.
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Inland waterways and inland ports which form part of the comprehensive network are indicated on the maps in Annex I and Annex IIIa.
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 Inland waterways and inland ports which form part of the comprehensive network are indicated on the maps in Annex I. The inland ports that form part of the comprehensive network shall also be listed in Annex IIIa to this Directive.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) related infrastructure such as locks, elevators, bridges, reservoirs, flood prevention systems;
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) interconnecting points with other transport modes;
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) Last mile connections;
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) passenger and freight terminals and logistic platforms for passenger and freight transport on waterways, and ones interfacing between inland waterways and other means of transport.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Port-associated equipment shall enable in particular propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity. It includes waste reception facilities and the equipment for ice breaking, hydrological surveys, and dredging and maintenance of the port and port approaches.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Port-associated equipment shall enable in particular propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Port-associated equipment shall enable in particular propulsion and operating systems which reduce water and air pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity. It includes waste reception facilities and shore side electricity facilities.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Port-associated equipment shall enable in particular propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3. Port-associated equipment shall enable in particular propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity. It includes waste reception
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 2. Port operators or the competent authority governing a port shall ensure that any inland port offers at least one freight terminal open to all operators in a non-
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union. Furthermore, sustainable passenger transport patterns need to be based on multi-modal solutions for increased modality for all citizens as well as improved social inclusion.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the full implementation and smooth functioning of the Sin
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the EU 2020 targets, the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks should be in line with the objectives endorsed by the Commission communication "A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low-carbon economy in 2050" and the priorities defined in the White Paper on Transport and therefore contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic and social cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods and ensuring accessibility for all regions of the Union.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the smooth functioning of the internal market and the strengthening of economic
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient way with energy-efficient clean technologies.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient way. Railway interoperability could be promoted by innovative solutions that improve the compatibility among the different systems, such as on-board equipment and multi-gauge tracks.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient way. In order to create European added value, the Union should focus its efforts and concentrate its resources on cross- border sections that have been abandoned or cut since the end of the Second World War. Priority should be given to the upgrading or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure.
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) These specific objectives should be achieved by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans- European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States and towards the countries of the Balkan peninsula, with a view to the accession of Croatia to the Union in 2013 and the negotiations under way with other candidate countries and potential candidates from the same geographical area.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans- European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States. An efficient cross-border green corridor approach between hubs and terminals would be the foundation for utilising the infrastructure in a more efficient way and achieving effective co-modality.
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans- European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States as well as neighbouring countries.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans- European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5 a) In accordance with the White Paper on Transport 'Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system', the Union should aim at minimising and internalising all external costs and apply the 'polluter pays' principle enshrined in the Treaties.1 __________________ 1 Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 b (new) (5 b) The focus on the upgrading or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure will create much more additional short- and long-term employment than the construction of new infrastructure alone.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network policy has to take into account the evolution of the transport policy and infrastructure ownership. In the past, Member States were the principal entity in charge of creating and maintaining transport infrastructure. However, other entities, including private, have also become relevant for the realisation of a multimodal trans-European transport network, including for example infrastructure managers, concessionaires or port, interport and airports authorities.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network policy has to take into account the evolution of the transport policy and infrastructure ownership. In the past, Member States were the principal entity in charge of creating and maintaining transport infrastructure. However,
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network policy has to take into account the evolution of the transport policy and infrastructure ownership. In the past, Member States were the principal entity in charge of creating and maintaining transport infrastructure. However, other entities, including private, have also become relevant for the realisation of a multimodal trans-European transport network, including for example infrastructure managers, concessionaires or port and airports authorities. Transport infrastructure is basically a common asset and it is important to emphasise that Member States should have the primary responsibility for expanding and maintaining transport infrastructure.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network policy has to take into account the evolution of the transport policy and infrastructure ownership. In the past, Member States were the principal entity in
source: PE-494.841
2012/10/08
TRAN
344 amendments...
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways and continuous bridge clearance as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways and continuous bridge clearance as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways and continuous bridge clearance as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance. This shall not apply to areas of specific importance to species of flora and fauna, such as near-natural, free-flowing rivers, Natura 2000 sites or candidate sites protected by the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) or the Birds Directive (2009/147/EC). Moreover, this shall be without prejudice to compliance with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. This should not be interpreted to the detriment of possible future developments of inland waterways in the EU.
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class I
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways regarding bridge clearance and depth and width of navigable channel as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance. Rivers, canals and lakes shall be maintained so as to preserve and ensure good navigation status.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways and continuous bridge clearance as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance in full compliance with the provisions laid down in Article 42.
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class I
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) rivers, canals and lakes are equipped with RIS, where appropriate.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) navigable rivers, canals and lakes are equipped with RIS.
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) rivers, canals and lakes are equipped with RIS, where applicable.
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) Rivers, canals and lakes shall guarantee "good navigation status" through close coordination and standards on minimum service levels to the navigation function as well as on waterway infrastructure maintenance and safety coordination across waterways.
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) Rivers, canals and lakes shall guarantee good navigation status through close coordination and standards on minimum service levels as regards the navigation function, waterway infrastructure maintenance and safety across waterways.
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for existing inland waterways: implementing measures necessary to reach the standards of the inland waterways class I
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for existing inland waterways: implementing measures necessary to reach the standards of the inland waterways class I
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where appropriate, achieving higher standards
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where appropriate, achieving higher standards than inland waterways class I
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) where appropriate, achieving higher standards than inland waterways class I
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) connecting inland port infrastructure to rail
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) connecting inland port infrastructure to railway and road transport infrastructure.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) free-flowing rivers close to their natural state to which special attention is paid and which can therefore be the subject of specific measures.
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) the promotion of inland waterways transport
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) promoting maritime transport and the motorways of the sea, without offering financial support to ports in third countries;
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) facilitating transport on inland waterways in conjunction with third countries;
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new) (dc) promoting transport on inland waterways.
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. At the request of a Member State, the Commission may in duly justified cases grant a time-limited exemption from the provisions of Articles 17(3)(a) and 18(1)(a) relating to the requested class of waterway if for environmental or other pressing reasons the minimum requirements laid down could not be met within the given time limit, on condition that the projects implemented must be aimed at complying with them. The granting of such an exemption shall also involve an agreement on further steps to be taken to comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways.
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) parking and rest areas;
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ITS and road user charging systems and equipment;
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) interconnecting points with other transport modes and particularly with rail;
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (f a) cycling and walking infrastructure.
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point f b (new) (f b) Trans-border Eurovelo routes, that facilitate soft mobility and sustainable tourism, interconnecting, where appropriate, with the railway network;
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. The high quality roads referred to in point (a) of paragraph 1 are those which play an important role in long-distance freight and passenger traffic, integrate the main urban and economic centres, interconnect with other transport modes and link mountainous, remote, landlocked and peripheral NUTS 2 regions to central regions of the Union. These roads shall be adequately maintained to allow safe and secure traffic.
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. High-quality roads shall be
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. High-quality roads shall be specially designed and built for motor traffic, and shall be either: motorways
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. High-quality roads shall be specially designed and built for motor traffic, and shall be either motorways
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. High-quality roads shall be specially designed and built for motor traffic, and shall be either motorways
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point a – point ii (ii) does not cross at
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point a – point iii a (new) (iiia) incorporates a hard shoulder.
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – introductory part (b) An express road is a
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – introductory part (b) An express road is a road
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – introductory part (b) An express road is a road
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii (ii) does not cross at
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii (ii) does not cross at
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii – point a (new) a) A conventional strategic road is an all purpose road which is not a motorway or express road, but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) A conventional strategic road is a road which is not a motorway or express road, but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) A conventional strategic road is a road which is not a motorway or express road, but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (b a) A conventional strategic road is a road which is not a motorway or express road, but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 4 4. Equipment associated with roads
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) Roads correspond to the provisions of Article 20(3). At the request of a Member State, exemptions from the provisions of Article 20(3) may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases, including cases where certain infrastructure investments could not be justified in economic cost- benefit terms, as long as an appropriate level of safety is ensured.
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) The safety of road transport infrastructure is assured for all motorised and non-motorised users, monitored and, when necessary, improved according to the procedure provided for by Directive 2008/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on road infrastructure safety management.
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) Mandatory road charges are levied for the use of infrastructure in accordance with Directive 2011/76/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures, including the obligation to add mark-ups in mountainous regions as foreseen in Article 7 (f) of the above-cited Directive.
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point e (e)
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States, regional authorities and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) internalisation of the external costs (accidents, pollution, noise, congestion) generated by each transport mode;
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) provision of
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) the progressive reduction of motorway traffic noise;
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) reduction of road infrastructure development gaps between Member States;
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) the impact of congestion on the roads.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (d b) promotion of a uniform developed European road transport system.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter 2 – section 4 – title Maritime transport infrastructure and Motorways of the Sea
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 Maritime ports which form part of the comprehensive network are listed in part 1 of Annex I and are also indicated on the maps in Annex I.
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 Maritime ports which form part of the comprehensive network are listed in Annex III bis and are also indicated on the maps in Annex I.
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) maritime ports, including the establishment, modernisation, maintenance and expansion of the capacity of the infrastructure necessary for transport operations within the port area;
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) interconnecting points with other transport modes and particularly with rail;
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) The maritime port is of strategic importance for its hinterland;
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) associated equipment including any facility to comply with provisions of Directive 2012/...../EU as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels;
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (h a) Last mile connections;
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) The total annual
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) The
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) The maritime port is located
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) The maritime port is located in an outermost region or a peripheral area, outside a radius of
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. Equipment associated with maritime transport infrastructure
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. Equipment associated with maritime transport infrastructure shall include in particular equipment for
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. Equipment associated with maritime transport infrastructure shall include in particular equipment for traffic and cargo management, for the reduction of negative environmental effects amongst others, for the use of alternative fuels, for ice breaking, for hydrological surveys, and for dredging and maintenance of the port and port approaches.
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. Equipment associated with maritime transport infrastructure shall include in particular equipment for ice breaking, hydrological surveys,
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Motorways of the sea represent the maritime dimension of the trans-European transport network. They shall consist of short-sea routes, ports, associated maritime infrastructure and equipment, and facilities enabling short-sea shipping or sea-river services between at least two ports, including hinterland connections
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Motorways of the sea represent the maritime dimension of the trans-European transport network and should aim at the achievement of a European maritime transport space without barriers. They shall consist of short-sea routes, ports, associated maritime infrastructure and equipment, and facilities but also simplified administrative formalities enabling short-sea shipping or sea-river services between at least two ports, including hinterland connections, in at least two different Member States. Motorways of the sea shall include:
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Motorways of the sea represent the maritime dimension of the trans-European transport network. They shall consist of short-sea routes, ports, associated maritime infrastructure and equipment, and facilities enabling short-sea shipping or sea-river services between at least two ports, including hinterland connections, in at least two different Member States, or between a Member State and a third country. Motorways of the sea shall include:
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) maritime links between maritime ports of the comprehensive network or between a port of the comprehensive network and a third-country port, should this be of strategic importance to the Union;
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) maritime links between maritime ports of the comprehensive network and third- country ports;
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) maritime links between maritime ports of the comprehensive network or between a port of the comprehensive network and a port of a third country neigbouring the Union;
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) port facilities, freight terminals and logistics platforms located outside the port area but constructed for the port operations, information and communication technologies (ICT) such as electronic logistics management systems, safety and security and administrative and customs procedures in at least one Member State;
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans-European transport network shall
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans-European transport network shall be proposed by at least two Member States. In the case of a peripheric Member State, the project of common interest for Motorways of the Sea in TEN-T can be proposed by only one Member State. They shall take one of the following forms:
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) constitute a maritime link and its hinterland connections within the core or comprehensive network between two or more core or comprehensive network ports;
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) constitute a maritime link and its hinterland connections between a core network port and ports of the comprehensive network
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) focus on the hinterland connections of the core and comprehensive network ports.
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) constitute a maritime link and its hinterland connections between a core network port and a third-country port, in keeping with the criteria laid down in Article 8(1).
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) constitute a maritime link and its hinterland connections between a core network port or a port of the comprehensive network and a port from a third country riparian to EU neighbouring seas.
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 - point c a (new) (ca) constitute a maritime link and its hinterland connections between a core network port and ports situated in third countries which represent strategic connections in terms of the enlargement of the Union, the development of relations with North African countries or the link between comprehensive network transport infrastructure on the mainland that is separated from third countries.
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans- European transport network shall be proposed by a Member State, in cooperation with a third country, in keeping with the criteria laid down in Article 8(1). They shall constitute a maritime link and its hinterland connections between a port of the comprehensive network and a third- country port.
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans-European transport network may also include activities that have wider benefits and are not linked to specific ports, such as activities for improving environmental performance, making available facilities for ice-breaking, activities ensuring year- round navigability, dredging operations, alternative fuelling facilities, emissions scrubbers, as well as the optimisation of processes, procedures and the human element, ICT platforms and information systems, including traffic management and electronic reporting systems.
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans-European transport network may also include activities that have wider benefits and are not linked to specific ports, such as services and actions to guarantee the seamless mobility of persons and goods in the most remote and outermost regions, activities for improving environmental performance, making available facilities for ice-breaking, activities ensuring year- round navigability, dredging operations, alternative fuelling facilities, as well as the optimisation of processes, procedures and the human element, ICT platforms and information systems, including traffic management and electronic reporting systems.
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Projects of common interest for
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. Projects of common interest for motorways of the sea in the trans-European transport network may also include activities that have wider benefits and are not linked to specific ports, such as activities for improving environmental performance, offering shore side electricity at berth to all ships already equipped for using such system, making available facilities for ice-breaking, activities ensuring year-
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. By 1 December 2013, the Commission shall present an updated and detailed concept for the Motorways of the Sea, based on the experiences so far and taking into account the current development of Union maritime transport. It shall also contain clear guidelines for the establishment of new motorways taking into account the forecasted traffic and its coherence in the comprehensive network. Furthermore, an impact study of the development of Motorways of the Sea presenting the costs and the benefits, accompanied by an environmental impact study, shall be presented.
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. By 1 December 2013, the Commission shall present an updated and detailed concept for the Motorways of the Sea, based on the experiences so far and taking into account all EU neighbouring seas and the current development of Union maritime transport as well as the forecasted traffic on the Motorways of the Sea. Furthermore, an impact study of the development of Motorways of the Sea presenting the costs and the benefits, accompanied by an environmental impact study, shall be presented.
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Within the sphere of their responsibility, Member States, regional authorities, port operators and infrastructure managers shall ensure that:
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) Maritime ports are connected, where appropriate, with railway lines, roads and, where possible, inland waterways of the comprehensive network, except in Malta and Cyprus for as long as no railway system is established within their territory.
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) Sea canals, port fairways and estuaries connect two seas, or provide access from the sea to maritime ports and correspond at least to inland waterway class
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. Port operators shall ensure that ports include equipment necessary to ensure the environmental performance of ships in ports, in particular reception facilities for ship generated waste and cargo residues in accordance with Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues, and shore side electricity facilities.
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 2 2. Port operators or the competent authority governing the port shall ensure that ports include equipment necessary to ensure the environmental performance of ships in ports, in particular reception facilities for ship generated waste and cargo residues in accordance both with Directive 2000/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues and with Directive 2012/..../EU on the sulphur content of marine fuels.
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall implement VTMIS and SafeSeaNet as provided for in Directive 2002/59/EC and deploy e- Maritime services, including in particular maritime single window services, as provided for in Directive 2010/65/EU.
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) introduction of new technologies and innovation for promotion of alternative fuels and energy efficient maritime transport, such as LNG.
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) interconnection of maritime and inland waterway ports with ports of third countries riparian to the European Union neighbouring seas.
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) interconnecting points with other transport modes and particularly with rail;
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) associated equipment including the noise abatement measures;
Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) Last mile connections;
Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) the volume threshold of 0,1 % does not apply if the airport is situated outside a radius of 100 km from the nearest airport
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (ii a) the airport is of strategic importance for the region served.
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 1. Within the sphere of their responsibility, Member States and airport operators shall ensure that any airport offers at least one terminal open to all operators in a non- discriminatory way and apply transparent, appropriate and fair charges.
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States, regional authorities and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) optimise existing infrastructure by increasing efficiency and sustainability, in particular by facilitating the distribution and uptake of alternative fuels;
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) improve multi-modal interconnections between airports and infrastructure for other transport modes.
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 a (new) In Annex I a new multi-modal link shall be added between Ljubljana (SI) and Salzburg (AT) as part of the core network in order to ensure a link between the key nodes of Munich (DE) and Ljubljana (SI) in accordance with the core network methodology. That link is vital to the appropriate development of Pan- European Corridor X, linking the Western Balkan countries, primarily Croatia, with the markets of central Europe.
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Within the sphere of their responsibility, Member States, operators of freight terminals, ports and airports, and infrastructure managers shall, in a fair and non-discriminatory manner, ensure that:
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States, regional authorities and other project promoters, when promoting projects of common interest and in addition to the priorities set out in Article 10, shall
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) ensuring that all aspects - economic, social and environmental - are taken into consideration when prioritisation is decided between freight and passenger transport on the TEN-T.
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Member States and other project promoters, when developing the comprehensive network in urban nodes shall, where feasible, aim to ensure:
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) adequate connection between different railway stations, ports or airports of the comprehensive network within an urban node;
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) bypassing of urban areas for rail freight transport where topography allows it;
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) relief of urban areas by inland waterway transport and city port facilities.
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. ITS shall be deployed as broadly as possible across the Union, as far as possible with the aim of enabling a set of interoperable basic capabilities in all Member States.
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Union, Member States and other project promoters shall pay particular attention to projects of common interest which provide efficient freight transport services that use the infrastructure of the comprehensive network and contribute to reducing carbon dioxide emissions and other external costs of transport. These projects shall in particular aim to:
Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Union, Member States and other project promoters shall pay particular attention to projects of common interest which provide efficient freight transport services that use the infrastructure of the comprehensive network and cross-border feed-in lines as well as contribute to reducing carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions. These projects shall in particular aim to:
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) promote the deployment of innovative transport services or new combinations of proven existing transport services, including through the application of ITS and the development of small scale ancillary infrastructure, necessary to achieve mainly environmental goals of these services as well as the establishment of relevant governance structures;
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) facilitate multi-modal transport service operations including the accompanying information flows and improve cooperation between transport service providers;
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) stimulate resource and carbon efficiency, notably in the fields of vehicle traction, driving/steaming, systems and operations planning
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) facilitate the deployment of Motorways of the Sea-based services.
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) improve links to the most vulnerable and isolated parts of the Union, in particular the outermost, island, remote and mountain regions.
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The comprehensive network and cross- border feed-in lines shall keep up with state-of-the-art technological developments and deployments. They shall in particular aim to:
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The comprehensive network shall keep up with state-of-the-art technological developments and deployments
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency as well as the introduction of alternative propulsion and electricity supply systems and the provision of corresponding infrastructure.
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improve the operation, accessibility, interoperability, multimodality and efficiency of the network, including multimodal ticketing and transport management;
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) promote measures to reduce external costs, such as pollution of any kind, including noise, emissions, congestion and health damage;
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) promote measures to reduce
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 Member States and other project promoters shall give due consideration to ensure that transport infrastructure provides for a high degree of safety and security for passenger and freight movements, including during periods when maintenance or modernisation work has to be carried out.
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 Member States, regional authorities and other project promoters shall give due consideration to ensure that transport infrastructure provides for a high degree of safety and security for passenger and freight movements.
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters shall give due trans-border consideration to the risk assessments and adaptation measures adequately improving the resilience to climate change, in particular in relation to precipitation, floods, storms, high temperature and heat waves, droughts, sea level rise and coastal surges, in compliance with any requirement which may be set out in relevant Union legislation.
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 1. Member States and other project promoters shall carry out environmental assessment of plans and projects in particular as provided in Council Directives 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment and 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, and Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council: 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, 2001/42/EC of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, and 2009/147/EC of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds in order to avoid or, when not possible, mitigate or compensate for negative impacts on the environment, such as landscape fragmentation, soil sealing, air and water pollution as well as noise, and to effectively protect biodiversity. For trans- border projects, Member States shall guarantee trans-border application of the legislation mentioned in this Article.
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1.a Member States and other project promoters shall ensure that such assessments are carried out efficiently, avoiding unnecessary delays.
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1.a Member States and other project promoters shall ensure that such assessments are carried out efficiently, avoiding unnecessary delays, in particular for projects of common interest.
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans- European transport network policy. It shall be structured in such a way as to take into consideration the future geographical framework with a view to the enlargement of the Union and the possible development and completion of the priority corridors. The core network shall in particular contribute to coping with increasing mobility and to the development of a low-carbon transport system.
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans- European transport network policy. The core network shall in particular contribute to coping with increasing mobility
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans- European transport network policy. The core network shall in particular contribute to coping with increasing mobility and to the development of a
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans- European transport network policy. The core network shall in particular contribute to coping with increasing mobility, with increasing needs for accessible transport for elderly people, persons with reduced mobility and disabled passengers, and to the development of a low-carbon transport system.
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 1. The core network, as set out in Annex I, shall consist of those parts of the comprehensive network which are of the highest strategic importance for achieving the objectives of the trans-
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 2 2. The core network shall be interconnected in nodes and provide for connections with neighbouring countries' transport infrastructure networks. In the case of a Member State having a long border with a neighbouring country, the interconnection between core networks and neighbouring' transport infrastructure network will be ensured in at least two points/transport modes.
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 3 3. The transport infrastructures constituting the core network are indicated in the corresponding maps of the comprehensive network in Annex I. The Port of Larnaca (CY) and the Airport of Paphos (CY) and their interconnections should be added to the core network, taking into account the need and requirement for connectivity, accessibility and cohesion within the Union for the effectiveness of its transportation system.
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall reflect evolving traffic demand and the need for multi- modal transport, as well as the seamless mobility of passengers and goods. State- of-the-art technologies and regulatory and governance measures for managing the infrastructure use shall be taken into account in order to ensure resource- efficient use of transport infrastructure and to provide for sufficient capacity.
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall reflect evolving traffic demand and the need for multi- modal transport. State-of-the-art technologies and regulatory and governance measures for managing
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 1. The core network shall reflect the need for social cohesion and a balanced distribution of the networks across the EU, evolving traffic demand and the need for multi-
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The infrastructure of the core network shall meet all the requirements set out in Chapter II
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2.
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The infrastructure of the core network shall meet all the requirements set out in Chapter II
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The infrastructure of the core network shall meet all the requirements set out in Chapter II
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The infrastructure of the core network shall meet all the requirements set out in Chapter II
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part (a) for railway transport infrastructure, except for isolated networks:
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part (a) for railway transport infrastructure, except for isolated networks:
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part (a) for railway transport infrastructure, except for isolated networks:
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part (a) for railway transport infrastructure, except for isolated railway networks:
Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part (a) for railway transport infrastructure, except for isolated networks:
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines except in duly justified cases where derogations under TSIs 'specific cases' apply;
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines, with the exception of sidings and terminals;
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 - full electrification of the railway lines, with the exception of holding sidings and terminals;
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines, excluding sidings;
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 –
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines, with the exception of sidings and terminals;
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines, excluding sidings;
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 - full electrification of the railway lines, with the exception of branch lines and terminals;
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1 – full electrification of the railway lines, with the exception of sidings;
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 –
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with regular freight traffic: at least 22.5 t axle load, 100 km/h line speed and
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 –
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 –
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with regular freight traffic: at least 22.5 t axle load, 100 km/h line speed and 7
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 – lines with regular freight traffic: at least 22.5 t axle load, 100 km/h line speed and
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 a (new) – without prejudice to Directive 2008/57/EC, at the request of a Member State, as regards railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as regards the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification and line speed;
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 a (new) - full deployment of ERTMS, except for isolated networks;
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 b (new) - nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1435 mm;
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 – demand-based availability of alternative clean fuels;
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 – availability of alternative clean fuels or shore side power supply;
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new) – inland waterways infrastructure of the core network can be exempted from meeting all the requirements set out in this Article and in Chapter II, if an inland waterway has been classified as a route of international importance in the European Agreement on Main Inland Roads of International Importance (AGN);
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 1 – the development of rest areas approximately every
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 1 – the development of rest areas approximately every
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point c – indent 1 – the development of rest areas
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Without prejudice to Directive 2008/57/EC, at the request of a Member State, as regards railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as regards the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification and line speed. At the request of a Member State, as regards road transport infrastructure, exemptions from the provisions of Article 20(3)(a) or (b) may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as long as an appropriate level of safety is ensured. The duly justified cases referred to in this paragraph shall include cases where infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms.
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 17 paragraph 3 (a), at the request of a Member State, the Commission may grant an exemption to go beyond the level of safeguards of the EU nature protection legislation, as described in Article 41 and 42, as long as the proportionality of the exemption can be demonstrated and the implementation of the core network is ensured.
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a .– full deployment of ERTMS;
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. At the request of a Member State, with regards to railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be, in duly justified cases, granted by the Commission, in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 55 (2) where fulfilment of certain standards would not be feasible due to economic reasons or in the case of isolated networks. This can cover the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification, line speed etc.
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Without prejudice to Directive 2008/57/EC, at the request of a Member State, as regards railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as regards the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification and line speed. At the request of a Member State, as regards road transport infrastructure, exemptions from the provisions of Article 20(3)(a) or (b) may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as long as an appropriate level of safety is ensured. The duly justified cases referred to in this paragraph shall include cases where infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms.
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Without prejudice to Directive 2008/57/EC, at the request of a Member State, as regards railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as regards the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification and line speed. At the request of a Member State, as regards road transport infrastructure, exemptions from the provisions of Article 20(3)(a) or (b) may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as long as an appropriate level of safety is ensured. The duly justified cases referred to in this paragraph shall include cases where infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms.
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point d – indent 1 -
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point d– indent 1 a (new) – enable the implementation of the Single European Sky.
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 a (new) Article 45 a 3. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 17 as regards inland waterway transport infrastructure, at the request of a Member State, exemptions from the minimum requirements may only be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as long as the proportionality of the exemption can be demonstrated and the implementation of the core network is ensured.
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 a (new) Article 45 a Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 17 as regards inland waterway transport infrastructure, at the request of a Member State, exemptions from the minimum requirements may only be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as long as the proportionality of the exemption can be demonstrated and the implementation of the core network is ensured.
Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Articles 1(4), 47(2) and (3),
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 3. Without prejudice to Article 47(2) and (3), the Member States shall ensure the core network is completed and complies with the provisions of this Chapter by 31 December 2030
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Efforts shall be made to complete the core network and comply with the relevant provisions of this Chapter by 31 December 2030.
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 A (new) - maritime ports and airports which are of strategic importance for island regions and outermost regions;
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new) - major airports with more than 1% passenger air traffic within the EU.
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – maritime ports
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – maritime ports
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new) - a) Their annual volume meets the following threshold formula: (bulk tonnage port / 1 % of the total bulk tonnage of all EU seaports) + (non-bulk tonnage port / 1 % of the total non-bulk tonnage of all EU seaports) > 1. The reference amount for the total volumes is the latest available three-year average, based on the statistics published by Eurostat. Bulk cargo is understood to comprise dry and liquid cargo, including oil. b) In insular Member States or NUTS 1 regions with access to the sea, where no ports are classified according to the above formula, as a general rule, only one seaport along each continuous coastline is classified as primary node. A second port may be classified as primary node if the corresponding hinterland covers landlocked NUTS 1 regions and the cumulative transhipment volume exceeds the threshold set out in the above formula. The size and the hinterland connectivity of the ports are taken into account when considering two ports along a continuous coastline or in an insular Member State for classification as primary nodes. Ports on islands which are not themselves Member States do not qualify as primary nodes since their hinterland connections, if in the TEN-T at all, typically belong to the comprehensive network. c) Seaports along core network links crossing the sea that are not primary nodes, but are bridgeheads of corresponding ferries, are included as secondary nodes.
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new) – at least one airport for each NUTS 1 region;
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 2. Maritime ports indicated in Part 2 of Annex II shall be connected with
Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 2. Maritime ports
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 2. Maritime ports indicated in Part 2 of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2030
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 3. The main airports indicated in Part 1b of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 20
Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 3. The main airports indicated in Part 1b of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2050
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 3. The main airports indicated in Part 1b of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2050 at the latest. Taking into account potential traffic demand, such airports shall be integrated into the high speed rail network wherever possible, through railway lines and rail-based systems as a matter of priority.
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 3. The main airports indicated in Part 1b of Annex II shall be connected with the railway and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2050
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 1. Core network corridors are an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network. Core network corridors shall be based on modal integration, interoperability, as well as on a coordinated development and management of infrastructure, in order to lead to resource-efficient multimodal transport. The infrastructure of core network corridors shall be developed in such a way as to make bottleneck-free national and cross-border use possible and bring about sustainable environmental improvements.
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 1. Core network corridors are an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network. Core network corridors shall be based on modal integration, interoperability, as well as on a coordinated development and management of infrastructure, in order to lead to
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 1. Core network corridors are an instrument to facilitate EU-wide cohesion and the coordinated implementation of the core network. Core network corridors shall be based on modal integration, interoperability, as well as on a coordinated development and management of infrastructure, in order to lead to resource- efficient multimodal transport available in all the regions of the EU.
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 2. Core network corridors shall provide for a coordinated approach with regard to infrastructure use and investments, so as to manage capacities in the most efficient and sustainable way. Multimodal infrastructure within core network corridors shall be built and coordinated, wherever needed, in a way that optimises the use of each transport mode and their cooperation. The core network corridors shall support the comprehensive deployment of interoperable traffic management systems.
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 2. Core network corridors shall provide for a coordinated approach with regard to infrastructure use and investments, so as to manage capacities in the most efficient way. Multimodal infrastructure within core network corridors shall be built and coordinated, wherever needed, in a way that optimises the use of each transport mode and their cooperation. The core network corridors shall support the comprehensive deployment of interoperable traffic management systems, innovation and new technologies.
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. In cases when implementation of a core network project due to financial or administrative constraints notably reduces possibilities for a core network corridor project to be implemented, priority shall be given to a core network corridor project.
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Setting up an initial list of these corridors shall not be understood as an automatic pre-requsite for support from the ERDF, Cohesion Fund or from the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 1. Core network corridors consist of parts of the core network. They shall involve at least three transport modes and cross at least three Member States. They cover the most important cross-border long-distance flows in the core network. In the most crowded sections of a core network corridor, each mode of transport (preferably in rail) may include more than one line even if they are not side by side.
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. In duly justified cases the core network corridor may involve only two countries.
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 3. Core network corridors
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 3. Core network corridors shall include maritime ports and its accesses, except in duly justified cases. Each corridor shall develop Motorways of the Sea wherever possible in order to achieve efficient and sustainable transport.
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. With regards to rail infrastructure, the governance structure of rail freight corridors (Regulation (EU) No 913/2010) will be fully integrated into those of the core network corridors.
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Core network corridors shall include the existing cooperation structure of rail freight corridors set up in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 whose work shall be integrated into the work of the core network corridors. The alignment of rail freight corridors shall be adapted to correspond to the alignment of the core network corridors and take full account of their new multimodal dimension.
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Railway freight corridors set up in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the ERTMS corridors should be a part of the core network corridors.
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Within these core network corridors there are parts with a major socio- economic impact and a greater freight and/or passengers exchange. These parts should be fully operational before the others to reinforce European competitiveness.
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Wherever appropriate, railway freight corridors set up in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the ERTMS corridors should be a part of the core network corridors.
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Core network corridors shall be based upon existing corridors, namely ERTMS corridors and rail freight corridors established or under establishment in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 913/2010. Core network corridors may include the cooperation structures of Rail Freight Corridors. In such cases it shall be ensured that this does not negatively affect the functioning of these cooperation structures and that the Core Network Corridor is aligned on the Rail Freight Corridor concerned".
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. 'Green' corridors shall be integrated into the core network corridors.
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. These major parts concern two key European vectors that cover these core network corridors: the Eurasian Vector (with two different trunks) and the Western North-South Vector (with two trunks as well), as they are set out in the Annex Part 1(c) [new] to Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 of ... [Connecting Europe Facility].
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 1 1. Each Member State shall participate in at least
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 2. The list of core network corridors is set out in Annex
Amendment 684 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 2. The list of core network corridors is set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 of … [Connecting Europe Facility]. In addition, the general provisions laid down in Chapter 2, Section 7, particularly regarding new technologies and innovations, shall apply to all core network corridors and modes of transport.
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Based on Annex I to Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], the core network corridors shall be illustrated by a schematic indicative map contained in Annex I of this Regulation.
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Based on Annex I to Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], the core network corridors are illustrated in maps in Annex I of this Regulation including intermodal nodes, missing links, cross -border sections
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of core network corridors, the Commission shall designate, after consultation with the Member States concerned, and after having consulted the European Parliament, persons called ‘European Coordinator’. Based on the principle of subsidiarity, the European Coordinator shall be designated only for those core network corridors which require special EC assistance in order to ensure timely implementation of the corridor.
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of core network corridors, the Commission shall designate,
Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of core network corridors, the Commission shall designate, after consultation with the Member States concerned, and after having consulted the European Parliament, persons called ‘European Coordinator’. Based on the principle of subsidiarity, the European Coordinator shall be designated only for those core network corridors which require special EC assistance in order to ensure timely implementation of the corridor.
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 2 2. The European Coordinator shall be chosen, in particular, on the basis of his/her experience of European institutions and knowledge of issues relating to transport and to the financing and the socio- economic and environmental evaluation of major projects.
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 2 2. The European Coordinator shall be chosen, in particular, on the basis of his/her experience
Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 4 4. The European Coordinator shall act in the name and on behalf of the Commission. The remit of the European Coordinator
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 4 4. The European Coordinator shall act in the name and on behalf of the Commission. The remit of the European Coordinator shall relate to a single core network corridor. The European Coordinator shall draw up together with the Member States concerned a work plan for the activities to be fulfilled, verifying that the requisite consultations have been held with local and regional authorities and with civil society.
Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point a a (new) (a a) insure that national infrastructure plans take into account the development of the corridor
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) report to the Member States, to the Commission and
Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) report to the Member States, to the Commission and, as appropriate, to all other entities directly involved in the development of the core network corridor on any difficulties encountered and contribute to finding appropriate solutions; if the European Coordinator considers that the smooth running of a project is being seriously hampered, he or she may also alert the Commission so that it can enforce the provisions of Article 59 as soon as possible;
Amendment 697 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point c (c) draw up a report every year for the European Parliament, the Commission and the Member States concerned on the progress achieved in implementing the core network corridor and its links with other networks;
Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) consult, in cooperation with the Member States concerned, in particular
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point d a (new) (da) in taking this action, have sufficient powers and resources to resolve situations with regard to which a local solution cannot be found and to work on the problems related to the different modes of transport included in the single corridor;
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. harmonise work with Coordinators of Priority Areas of existing and future macro-regional strategies, which are specifically dedicated to the improvement of transport links, in cases where the core network corridor for which the European Coordinator is responsible forms part of the territory covered by a EU macro- regional strategy.
Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 7. Without prejudice to the applicable procedures laid down in Union and national law, the Commission
Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 7. Without prejudice to the applicable procedures laid down in Union and national law, the Commission may request the opinion of the European Coordinator when examining applications for Union funding for core network corridors for which the European Coordinator is responsible and for nodes situated close to those corridors.
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. The coordinators responsible for implementing specific ITS projects, such as ERTMS, shall remain in office for the period 2014-2020. Coordination between ERTMS activities, the relevant structures and the new multimodal corridor structures must be ensured.
Amendment 704 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. The implementation of each ITS project relating to several corridors shall be the responsibility of a coordinator whose term of office shall be from 2014 to 2020. Coordination between ITS (Intelligent Transport Systems) activities and the relevant multimodal corridor structures must be ensured.
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. For the implementation of each ITS project relating to several corridors – such as ERTMS – a coordinator shall be appointed. Coordination between ITS activities and the relevant multimodal corridor structures must be ensured.
Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. If the Coordinator is unable to carry out his or her mandate satisfactorily and in line with the requirements laid down in this Article, the Commission may at any time withdraw the appointment and appoint a replacement.
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. The implementation of ERTMS shall be the responsibility of a single coordinator whose term of office shall be from 2014 to 2020. Coordination between ERTMS activities and the relevant multimodal corridor structures must be ensured.
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 1 1. For each core network corridor, the Member States, regions and local authorities located on the TENs concerned shall jointly establish a corridor platform responsible for defining the general objectives of the core network corridor and for preparing and supervising the measures referred to in Article 53(1).
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and, as appropriate, other public and private entities, such as the regional and local authorities concerned. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and representatives of the authorities responsible for managing the maritime and inland ports affected by the corridor shall participate in the corridor platform.
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned, and all relevant local authorities, regional authorities where appropriate, infrastructure managers, transport operators, transport users and, as appropriate, other public and private entities. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure shall participate in the corridor platform.
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States and regions concerned and, as appropriate, other public and private entities. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure shall participate in the corridor platform.
Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and,
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States, regions and local authorities concerned and, as appropriate, other public and private entities. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure shall participate in the
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The corridor platform shall be composed of the representatives of the Member States concerned and of the regional and local authorities affected and, as appropriate, other public and private entities. In any case, the relevant infrastructure managers as defined in Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure shall participate in the corridor platform.
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. In order to avoid any duplication of activity, adequate coordination must be ensured between the corridor platforms and the structures provided for in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010.
Amendment 719 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. In order to avoid any duplication of activity, adequate coordination must be ensured between the corridor platforms and the structures provided for in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010.
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. For each core network corridor, the Member States and regional authorities concerned, in cooperation with the corridor platform, shall jointly draw up and notify to the Commission a corridor development plan within six months after entry into force of this Regulation. This plan shall include in particular:
Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a description of the characteristics of the core network corridor, including bottlenecks and disconnections from adjacent corridors;
Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a description of the characteristics of the core network corridor, including cross- border sections and bottlenecks;
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) The corridor development plan shall take into account the efforts already made by the Member States and the relevant infrastructure managers in implementing Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the experiences and results of the existing rail freight corridor companies or the entities concerned.
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the programme of measures necessary for developing the core network corridor and its interconnections with other corridors;
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis as defined in Article 3(ra);
Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 4 – risk assessment, including the possible impacts of climate change on the infrastructure and where appropriate proposed measures to enhance climate resilience, while fully taking into account Strategic Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Assessments at corridor level;
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 5 - measures to be taken in order to mitigate
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) measures to establish public consultation procedures geared towards the development of corridor projects of common interest, particularly when they affect cross-border sections. The Coordinator shall ensure that an extensive public consultation takes place well in advance with all stakeholders and civil society. He or she shall also ensure that measures to identify problems, if there are any, should be drawn up, and propose ways of developing the corridor plan and implementing it in a balanced manner.
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point f – indent 2 the related financial plan, with the various sources envisaged for funding and financing, at international, national, regional, local and Union level,
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point f – indent 2 the related financial plan, with the various sources envisaged for funding and financing, at international, national, regional, local and Union level,
Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part In order to support the implementation of the core network corridors and their interconnections with other corridors, the Commission may adopt implementing decisions for the core network
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) defin
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where sections of the corridor coincide with the corridors under Regulation (EU) No 913/2010, the development plan and market study already provided for in that Regulation shall be taken into consideration in the drawing up of the corridor development plan.
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Where sections of the corridor coincide with the corridors under Regulation (EU) No 913/2010, the development plan and market study already provided for in that Regulation shall be taken into consideration in the drawing up of the corridor development plan.
Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall inform the Commission continuously through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec), about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for this purpose. This information shall include detailed statistics concerning any relevant financial aid, in the form of subsidies, loans or other financial instruments, used for each project of common interest and for each transport mode.
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall inform the Commission continuously and entirely transparently through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec), about the p
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 Member States shall inform the Commission continuously through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec), about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made
Amendment 744 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 2. Every
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 – point a (new) Amendment 746 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 56 concerning the adaptation of Annexes I, II and III to take account of possible changes resulting from the quantitative thresholds laid down in Articles 16, 24, 29 and 33 after prior consultations and with the approval of the Member States concerned. When adapting the Annexes, the Commission shall:
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 748 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) adjust the schematic indicative map for the core network corridors whenever the list of core network corridors set out Annex I to Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility] is changed.
Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 a (new) Article 54a Methodologies for socio-economic cost- benefit analysis, European added value and climate impact assessment Based on the definitions in Article 3 the Commission shall develop methodologies for: – a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis; – European added value assessments; – environmental and climate impact assessments. These methodologies shall be used for the assessment of projects of common interest as set out in Article 7. These methodologies shall be adopted by means of delegated acts by 31 January 2014 at the latest in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 56.
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 a (new) Article 54a Involvement of regional and local authorities and civil society Member States shall ensure that the interests of regional and local authorities and of local civil society affected by a project of common interest are appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phase of a project. By 1 December 2013, the Commission shall present guidelines and a best practice manual for this purpose.
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 a (new) Article 54 a Methodologies for socio-economic cost- benefit analysis, European added value and climate impact assessment Based on the definitions in Article 3, the Commission shall develop detailed methodologies for: - a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis; - the assessment of the European added value; - climate impact assessments. Those methodologies shall be used for the assessment of projects of common interest as set out in Article 7. The Commission shall give particular attention to minimising the administrative burden that the expanded assessment process may present, in particular to smaller projects with low estimated total budgets. Those methodologies shall be adopted by delegated acts by no later than 31 January 2014 in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 56.
Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 b (new) Article 54b Involvement of regional and local authorities and civil society Member States shall ensure that the regional and local authorities and local civil society affected by a project of common interest participate in the planning and construction phase of a project. By 1 December 2013 at the latest, the Commission shall present guidelines and a best practice manual for this purpose.
Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 54(3) shall be conferred on the Commission for a
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 4 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council, as well as to stakeholders of connecting modes, such as infrastructure managers and operators.
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 202
Amendment 756 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 20
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 2023 at the latest, the Commission shall carry out a review of the implementation of the core network, evaluating compliance with the provisions laid down in this Regulation and the progress in implementation. Along with the review, the Commission shall also bring forward a proposal to include the priority projects listed in Decision No 661/2010 on the TEN-T guidelines, studies on which are still ongoing or have been finalised.
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 Each year, with the assistance of the corridor coordinators, the Commission shall analyse: (a) compliance with the programme contracts (b) the state of play as regards each of the projects By 31 December 202
Amendment 759 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 2023 at the latest, the Commission shall carry out a review of the implementation of the core network, evaluating compliance with the provisions laid down in this Regulation and the progress in implementation. At the request of a Member State, this review, which may also include possible extension of the core TEN-T network, may be conducted sooner, namely immediately after receipt of such a request.
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 2023
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 By 31 December 2023 at the latest, the Commission shall carry out a review of the implementation of the core network, evaluating compliance with the provisions laid down in this Regulation and the progress in implementation. At the duly justified request of two or more Member States concerned, a partial review, including a change to or an extension of the core TEN-T network in accordance with the appropriate methodology, may be carried out by the Commission within three months of receipt of such a request.
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 a (new) When carrying out this review, the Commission shall evaluate whether the core network as foreseen in this Regulation can comply with the provisions of Chapter III by 2030 while taking into account the economic and budgetary situation in the Union and in individual Member States. The Commission shall also evaluate, in consultation with the Member States, whether the core network should be modified taking into account the developments in transport flows and national investment planning. If necessary, the Commission may submit a proposal for modification of this Regulation. In the framework of the revision by 2023, the Commission should evaluate in cooperation with the Member States concerned whether other parts, such as certain class III inland waterways, should be integrated into the network.
Amendment 763 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 b (new) Within that proposal, the Commission may also specify the date for completion of the comprehensive network as laid down in Article 9(3).
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 59 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. In order to meet the deadlines for completing the core and comprehensive networks by 2030 and 2050 respectively, national governments shall make efforts to speed up the permitting and construction processes of rail infrastructure projects whilst ensuring that affected local and regional stakeholders are consulted.
source: PE-494.842
2012/10/09
ENVI
4 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23 a) The regulations on the TEN-T Guidelines should guarantee that EU infrastructure projects will also adequately take into account the environmental and biodiversity aspects whilst delivering measurable steps towards a low-carbon, climate-resilient and resource-efficient economy. Trans- European transport networks should contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy and favour the transition towards a low- carbon economy;
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 - paragraph 1 - point (b) (b)
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 Member States and other project promoters shall carry out environmental assessment of plans and projects in particular as provided in Council Directives 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment and 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora , and Directives of the European Parliament and of the Council: 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy , 2001/42/EC of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment , and 2009/147/EC of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds in order to avoid or, when not possible, mitigate or compensate for negative impacts on the environment, such as to landscape fragmentation, reduction of natural habitats, migration barriers, collision of vehicles with animals, soil sealing, air and water pollution as well as noise
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 - paragraph 2 - point (c) - indent 1 – the development of rest areas approximately every 50 kilometres
source: PE-497.801
2012/10/11
TRAN
226 amendments...
Amendment 765 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 02/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 766 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 02/33 To add the "Walloon railway backgone", the line connecting Valenciennes (FR) with Aachen (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the rail core network
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 02/33 To add the Oder Waterway (Ostrava – Opole – Wrocław – Frankfurt am Oder – Szczecin) to the core network.
Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 03/33 To add the airports: Constanța- Cluj- Napoca (România) to the core network
Amendment 769 #
To include the whole Via Carpathia Road (Thessaloniki, Sofia, Calfat, Lugoj, Timișoara, Oradea, Debrecen, Miskolc, Košice, Rzeszów, Lublin, Białystok, Kaunas, Klaipeda) in the road core network.
Amendment 770 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 03/33 to add the ‘Mosonmagyaróvár-Csorna- Szombathely-Nagykanizsa’ section of road to the core road network
Amendment 771 #
to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 03/33 to add the EuroVelo-Routes map1to the comprehensive network ____________ 1 http://www.eurovelo.org/routes/
Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 03/33 To add "Walloon railway backgone", the line connecting Valenciennes (FR) with Aachen (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the rail core network
Amendment 774 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 03/33 To add the Mons-Liege section of the E42 motorway, connecting Lille (FR) with Cologne (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the road core network
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 04/33 To add the railway line Aarhus – Frederikshavn - Hirtshals to the core network
Amendment 776 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 04/33 To add the railway line Nyköbing – Gedser to the core network
Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 04/33 to add the Swedish navigable inland waterways connecting Göteborg with the hinterland lakes
Amendment 778 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 04/33 to add the Swedish navigable inland waterways connecting Stockholm with the hinterland lakes
Amendment 779 #
To change the status of the railway section from Aarhus to Hirtshals and Frederikshavn, respectively, from the comprehensive network to the core network (freight)
Amendment 780 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 04/33 Sweden’s inland waters between Göteborg and the lakes in the interior, and between Stockholm and the lakes in the interior, are added to the map.
Amendment 781 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 05/33 To change the status of the railway section from Aarhus to Hirtshals and Frederikshavn, respectively, from the comprehensive network to the core network (passengers)
Amendment 782 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 05/33 To change the status of the road section from Aarhus to Hirtshals and Frederikshavn, respectively, from the comprehensive network to the core network
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 05/33 To include the whole Via Carpathia Road (Thessaloniki, Sofia, Calfat, Lugoj, Timișoara, Oradea, Debrecen, Miskolc, Košice, Rzeszów, Lublin, Białystok, Kaunas, Klaipeda) in the road core network.
Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 07/33 To remove Northern Ireland's rail freight network from the core network
Amendment 785 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 07/33 To add the A75 in Scotland to the road core network
Amendment 786 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 07/33 To add Londonderry and its connecting route to Belfast to the core network, comprising the roads M2 - A6 as well as the railway line Belfast - Coleraine - Londonderry
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 08/33 To add the "Walloon railway backgone", the line connecting Valenciennes (FR) with Aachen (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the rail core network
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 08/33 To add the port of Guyane (FR) to the core network
Amendment 789 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 08/33 to add the rail connection, bridging Colmar/FR with Freiburg/DE to the comprehensive network
Amendment 790 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 08/33 To delete the tunnel project on the connection Lyon - Turino from the rail core network and include the existing railway line instead;
Amendment 791 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 08/33 Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 08/33 Incorporate the Tours-Dijon section into the core network
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 09/33 To delete the tunnel project on the connection Lyon - Turino from the rail core network and include the existing railway line instead;
Amendment 794 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 09/33 To add the rail connection, bridging Colmar/FR with Freiburg/DE to the comprehensive network
Amendment 795 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 09/33 Incorporate the Nantes Saint Nazaire- Lyon section into the core network
Amendment 796 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 09/33 To add the "Walloon railway backgone", the line connecting Valenciennes (FR) with Aachen (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the rail core network
Amendment 797 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 09/33 To add the Mons-Liege section of the E42 motorway, connecting Lille (FR) with Cologne (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the road core network
Amendment 798 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 10/33 The port of Bergen op Zoom is added to the core network.
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 10/33 The port of Venlo is added to the core network.
Amendment 800 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 10/33 The port of Born is added to the core network.
Amendment 801 #
The Zuyder Zee ports (Deventer, Zwolle and Kampen) are added to the core network.
Amendment 802 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 10/33 The planned inland waterway link between the Twente Canal and the Mittelland Canal (between Enschede and Osnabrück) is added to the map.
Amendment 803 #
To add the "Walloon railway backgone", the line connecting Valenciennes (FR) with Aachen (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the rail core network
Amendment 804 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 11/33 Eliminate the bottleneck between Valenciennes and Mons (global rail freight network)
Amendment 805 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 11/33 Incorporate the port of Valenciennes into the core network
Amendment 806 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 11/33 Incorporate the London-Dunkirk-Lille- Luxembourg rail freight route into the core network
Amendment 807 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 11/33 To add the "Walloon railway backgone", the line connecting Valenciennes (FR) with Aachen (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the core network
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 11/33 To add the Mons-Liege section of the E42 motorway, connecting Lille (FR) with Cologne (DE) via Mons (BE), Charleroi (BE), Namur (BE) and Liège (BE) to the road core network
Amendment 809 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 810 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 Amendment 811 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 To delete the connection Wiener Neustadt - Bruck an der Mur - Graz from the rail core network
Amendment 812 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 Amendment 813 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 To add the railway line Wiener Neustadt – Sopron – Szambathely – Koprivnica – Zagreb – Kopr to the core network
Amendment 814 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 to add the rail connection, bridging Colmar/FR with Freiburg/DE, to the comprehensive network
Amendment 815 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 To add the railway line Linz – Prague to the comprehensive network
Amendment 816 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 818 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 12/33 Amendment 819 #
to add the ‘Mosonmagyaróvár-Csorna- Szombathely-Nagykanizsa’ section of road to the core road network
Amendment 820 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 821 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the rail connection Berlin - Karnin Brigde - Świnoujście to the comprehensive network
Amendment 822 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the rail connection, bridging Colmar/FR with Freiburg/DE, to the comprehensive network
Amendment 823 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to delete the section of R52 between Brno and the border with Austria from the road core network
Amendment 824 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to delete the connection Wiener Neustadt - Bruck an der Mur - Graz from the rail core network
Amendment 825 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add the railway line Linz – Prague to the comprehensive network
Amendment 826 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add the railway line Passau - Freyung - Prague to the comprehensive network
Amendment 827 #
to delete the sections Metz - Saarbrücken; Saarbrücken - Mannheim; Mannheim - Frankfurt; Frankfurt - Würzburg; Würzburg - Nürnberg; Nürnberg - Regensburg; Regensburg - Passau; Passau - Wels from the rail core network
Amendment 828 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 829 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 830 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To include the D11 motorway (Prague– Hradec Králové), the R35/R55 expressways (Hradec Králové–Přerov) and the R43 expressway (Moravská Třebová–Brno) in the core network rather than the D1 motorway;
Amendment 831 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add the Ústí nad Labem–Dresden high-speed rail link to the comprehensive TEN-T network;
Amendment 832 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add Brno as a node in the core TEN-T network;
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To maintain the crossing of the two TEN- T core network corridors (the Baltic– Adriatic Corridor and the Hamburg– Nicosia Corridor) in the city of Brno;
Amendment 834 #
To modernise the existing Česká Kubice border station–Regensburg stretch within the core network;
Amendment 835 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To reclassify the Plzeň–Cheb– Marktredwitz rail corridor as part of the comprehensive network or to define an exemption from the core network corridor requirements for the already completed Plzeň–Cheb railway section;
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add the IV rail corridor and the Prague–Linz section of the D3 motorway to the core network;
Amendment 837 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To change the route of the Prague– Wrocław rail corridor to include Mladá Boleslav and Liberec;
Amendment 838 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add the Lovosice–Dresden high-speed rail link to the comprehensive TEN-T network;
Amendment 839 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To transfer the Prague-Lovosice high- speed rail link from the comprehensive to the core TEN-T network;
Amendment 840 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 To add Karlovy Vary airport to the comprehensive TEN-T network;
Amendment 841 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 13/33 to add a multimodal link (railway and road) between Ljubljana (SI) and Salzburg (AT) to the core network
Amendment 843 #
To add the multimodal link (railway and road) between Ljubljana (SI) and Salzburg (AT) to the core network
Amendment 844 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 845 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the rail connection Berlin - Karnin Brigde - Świnoujście to the comprehensive network
Amendment 846 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the railway line Wiener Neustadt – Sopron – Szambathely – Koprivnica – Zagreb – Kopr to the core network
Amendment 847 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 849 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin to the rail core network
Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin as rail and road core network section
Amendment 851 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To include the D11 motorway (Prague– Hradec Králové), the R35/R55 expressways (Hradec Králové–Přerov) and the R43 expressway (Moravská Třebová–Brno) in the core network rather than the D1 motorway;
Amendment 852 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To add the Ústí nad Labem–Dresden high speed-rail link to the comprehensive TEN- T network;
Amendment 853 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To maintain the crossing of the two TEN- T core network corridors (the Baltic– Adriatic Corridor and the Hamburg– Nicosia Corridor) in the city of Brno;
Amendment 855 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To modernise the existing Česká Kubice border station–Regensburg stretch within the core network;
Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To reclassify the Plzeň–Cheb– Marktredwitz rail corridor as part of the comprehensive network or to define an exemption from the core network corridor requirements for the already completed Plzeň–Cheb railway section;
Amendment 857 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To add the IV rail corridor and the Prague–Linz section of the D3 motorway to the core network;
Amendment 858 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To change the route of the Prague– Wrocław rail corridor to include Mladá Boleslav and Liberec;
Amendment 859 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To add the Lovosice–Dresden high-speed rail link to the comprehensive TEN-T network;
Amendment 860 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To transfer the Prague-Lovosice high- speed rail link from the comprehensive to the core TEN-T network;
Amendment 861 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To add Karlovy Vary airport to the comprehensive TEN-T network;
Amendment 862 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To transfer the Prague-Linz rail corridor from the comprehensive to the core TEN- T network;
Amendment 863 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 14/33 To add the Oder Waterway (Ostrava – Opole – Wrocław – Frankfurt am Oder – Szczecin) to the core network
Amendment 864 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 To include the whole Via Carpathia Road (Thessaloniki, Sofia, Calfat, Lugoj, Timișoara, Oradea, Debrecen, Miskolc, Košice, Rzeszów, Lublin, Białystok, Kaunas, Klaipeda) in the road core network.
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin to the rail core network
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Szczecin as rail and road core network section
Amendment 867 #
to add the ‘Mosonmagyaróvár-Csorna- Szombathely-Nagykanizsa’ section of road to the core road network
Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 869 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the rail connection Berlin - Karnin Brigde - Świnoujście to the comprehensive network
Amendment 870 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 To add the railway line Passau - Freyung - Prague to the comprehensive network
Amendment 871 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to delete the connection using R52 from Brno to south from the road core network in order to avoid duplication in the road core network
Amendment 872 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Küstrin- Kietz - Kostrzyn nad Odrą - Gdańsk to the rail comprehensive network
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 15/33 to add the connection Berlin - Forst (Lausitz) - Wrocław to the rail core network
Amendment 874 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the port of Vigo to the core network
Amendment 875 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the port of Santander to the core network
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife to the core network
Amendment 877 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following sea ports to the comprehensive network: – Marín y Ría de Pontevedra – Vilagarcía de Arousa – Gandía – Alcudía – Guía de Isora – Salinetas – Arinaga
Amendment 878 #
add the following multimodal platforms to the comprehensive network: – Pontevedra – Zalia – Torrelavega – Júndiz – Monzón – El Vallés – El Prat – El Gorguel – Ciudad Real – Albacete – San Roque – Mérida – Ponferrada/El Bierzo – Castellón – Alicante – Benavente – Zamora – Miranda de Ebro – Burgos – Palencia – Área Central – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Arévalo – Ávila – Segovia
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following rail freight transport sections to the core network: – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Granada – Motril – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – León – Gijón / Avilés – Palencia – Santander – Madrid – Cáceres – Mérida – Mérida – Badajoz – Portuguese border – Mora – Ciudad Real – Mérida
Amendment 880 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 add the following rail passenger and freight transport section to the core network: – Zaragoza – Huesca – Central Pyrenees Crossing (‘Travesía Central’)
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 To add the Ports of Vilagarcía de Arousa and Marín-Ría de Pontevedra (Galicia) to the comprehensive network
Amendment 883 #
To add the Port of Vigo to the core network
Amendment 884 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 To add the route Lorca – Granada to the rail comprehensive network and to the rail core network (freight)
Amendment 885 #
To add the route Almeria – Motril – Malaga – Algeciras to the comprehensive network and to the rail core network (freight)
Amendment 886 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 16/33 Add the maritime port of Funchal to the core network
Amendment 887 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following airports to the core network: – Alicante – Gran Canaria – Málaga – Tenerife South (‘Tenerife Sur’) – Tenerife North (‘Tenerife Norte’) – Santiago de Compostela
Amendment 888 #
add the following airports to the comprehensive network: – Murcia/Corvera – Lleida – Huesca/Pirineos – Logroño – Albacete – Córdoba
Amendment 889 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the airport of Castellón to the comprehensive network
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following multimodal platforms to the core network: – Alcázar de San Juan – León – Antequera – Murcia – Valladolid – Vigo – Zaragoza
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following rail passenger transport sections to the core network: – Madrid – Toledo – Madrid – Alcázar – Albacete – Murcia – Almería – Málaga – Algeciras (along the coast) – Avilés – Oviedo – Bilbao – Santander – Oviedo – El Ferrol – A Coruña – Castejón – Logroño – Miranda – Mora – Alcázar – Linares – Moreda/Jaén/Córdoba – Ourense – Vigo (via Cercedo) – Ourense – Monforte – Lugo – A Coruña – Palencia – Santander – Segovia – Ávila – Sevilla – Cádiz – Sevilla – Huelva – Portuguese border – Valencia – Alicante (along the coast) – Motilla – Albacete – La Encina – Santiago – Vigo – Portuguese border – Granada – Motril – Antequera – Málaga – Madrid – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Monforte – Torralba – Soria – Castejón – Plasencia – León – Gijón
Amendment 892 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following rail passenger transport sections to the comprehensive network: – Almendricos – Águilas – Barcelona – Massanet – Barcelona – Puigcerdá – Játiva – Alcoy – Lleida – Manresa – Barcelona – Los Rosales – Zafra – Madrid – Burgos – Villalba – Segovia
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the following high-quality road sections to the core network: – Santander – Aguilar de Campoo – Palencia/Burgos – Vitoria – Alsasua – Pamplona – Jaca – Huesca – Lleida – Tarragona – Atalaya del Cañavate – Albacete – Murcia – Benavente – Verín – Ourense – Vigo – Gijón – Oviedo – León – Benavente – Zamora – Salamanca – Cáceres – Zafra – Sevilla -Oviedo-La espina– Ponferrada
Amendment 894 #
add the following high-quality road sections to the comprehensive network: – Valladolid – Aranda de Duero – Soria – Ourense – Santiago – Ourense – Guntín – Ponferrada – Ourense – Monforte – Chantada – Astorga – León – Burgos – Burgos – Logroño – Pamplona – Ávila – Salamanca – León – Valladolid – Segovia – Valladolid – Ávila – Maqueda – Toledo – Ocaña – Tarancón – Cuenca – Teruel – Alfajarín – Fraga -Catalayud – Daroca – Alcolea del Pinar – Monreal del Campo – Badajoz – Zafra – Córdoba – Baena – Granada – Huelva – Jabugo – Zafra – Estepa – Lucena – Baena – Jaén – Úbeda – Blanca – Avarán – La Font de la Figuera – Alicante – Alcoy – Játiva – Elche – Cartagena – Vera – Figueras – Puigcerdá – Ávila – Villacastín – San Rafael – Segovia
Amendment 895 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add Tenerife (ES) and Gran Canaria (ES) airports to the core network
Amendment 896 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 add the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife (ES) to the core network
Amendment 897 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 to add the section Benavente-Lugo-A Coruña (A6) and Benavente-Ourense- Vigo (A52) to the road core network
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 to add the “Autovía Cantábrico”(A8) to the road core network
Amendment 899 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 To add the Santiago de Compostela Airport (Galicia) to the core network
Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 To add the Railway High/Speed corridor León-Ourense-Santiago with connection to Vigo and A Coruña to the core network
Amendment 901 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 To add the railway line Vigo-Porto to the core network
Amendment 903 #
To add the Transcantrabric Corridor Bilbao-A Coruña to the rail core network
Amendment 904 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 to add Gran Canaria and Tenerife Airports to the core network
Amendment 905 #
to add the port of Santa Cruz de Tenerife to the core network
Amendment 906 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 Add Madeira airport to the core network
Amendment 907 #
to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 908 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 18/33 to add the port of Civitavecchia to the core network
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 18/33 to add the freight railway connection between La Spezia and Parma to the core network
Amendment 910 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 18/33 To delete the tunnel project on the connection Lyon - Turino from the rail core network and include the existing railway line instead;
Amendment 911 #
to add the port of Augusta to the core network
Amendment 912 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 18/33 To add the port of Cagliari to the core network
Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 18/33 To add the port of Olbia to the core network
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 to add the ‘Mosonmagyaróvár-Csorna- Szombathely-Nagykanizsa’ section of road to the core road network
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 916 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 to add the airport of Catania to the core network
Amendment 917 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 to delete Autostrada 31 from the road core network
Amendment 918 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 To delete the tunnel project on the connection Lyon - Turino from the rail core network and include the existing railway line instead;
Amendment 919 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 to add the passenger railway connection Siracusa-Gela-Agrigento-Caltanissetta to the comprehensive network
Amendment 920 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 On page 3
Amendment 921 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 To add the Grosseto-Fano trunk road (E78) to the core network
Amendment 922 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 To add the airport of Cagliari to the core network
Amendment 923 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 19/33 To add the airport of Olbia to the core network
Amendment 924 #
On page 3 of the map of Italy (north- eastern sector) the section between Vicenza and Trento, which corresponds to the Valdastico motorway, is deleted.
Amendment 925 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 20/33 To add the connection between Suceava- Dej-Cluj Napoca-Coslari to the railways (freight) core network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 20/33 To add the connection between Cluj Napoca-Oradea-Debrecen-Nyiregyhaza to the railways (freight) core network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 927 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 20/33 to add the section Buzău-Brăila-Galați to the rail core network (freight) as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 928 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 20/33 to add the section Halmeu-Cluj-Timisoara to the rail core network (freight) as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 929 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 20/33 to add the section Bihor- Oradea - Cluj- Napoca- Suceava-Iasi-Ungheni-Chisinau to the rail core network (freight)
Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Buzău-Brăila-Galați to the road core network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 931 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Constanța-București- Budapesta to the rail core network (passengers)
Amendment 932 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Buzău-Brăila-Galați to the rail core network (passengers) as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 933 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Drajna -Brăila-Galați to the road core network
Amendment 934 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Iasi-Targu Mures (East-West Hightway) to the road core network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 935 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the airports Constanța- Cluj- Napoca (România) to the core network
Amendment 936 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the segment Halmeu- Cluj- Napoca-Timisoara (România) to the rail core network (passengers) as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 937 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the ports: Galați, Braila, Tulcea, Sulina, Giurgiu (România) to the core network
Amendment 938 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Halmeu-Cluj-Napoca - Timisoara to the rail core network (passengers) as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 939 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 to add the section Bihor- Oradea - Cluj- Napoca- Suceava-Iasi-Ungheni-Chisinau to the rail core network (passengers)
Amendment 940 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To include the whole Via Carpathia Road (Thessaloniki, Sofia, Calfat, Lugoj, Timișoara, Oradea, Debrecen, Miskolc, Košice, Rzeszów, Lublin, Białystok, Kaunas, Klaipeda) in the road core network.
Amendment 941 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the connection between Suceava- Dej-Cluj Napoca-Coslariu to the railway (passenger) core network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 942 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the connection between Cluj Napoca-Oradea-Debrecen-Nyiregyhaza to the railway (passenger) core network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 943 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the connections between Miclauseni-Miraslau-Sebes to the road core network as "planned"
Amendment 944 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the connections between Miraslau-Oradea-Bors-Debrecen to the road core network as "planned"
Amendment 945 #
To add the connections between Bucharest-Craiova-Calafat to the road core network as "planned"
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 21/33 To add the connection between Constanta-Tulcea-Braila to the road comprehensive network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 947 #
To add the connection between Suceava- Baia Mare-Satu Mare to the road comprehensive network as "to be upgraded"
Amendment 948 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 22/33 to add the Airport of Paphos (CY) and the Port of Larnaca (CY) and their interconnections to the core network
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 23/33 To include the whole Via Carpathia Road (Thessaloniki, Sofia, Calfat, Lugoj, Timișoara, Oradea, Debrecen, Miskolc, Košice, Rzeszów, Lublin, Białystok, Kaunas, Klaipeda) in the road core network.
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 24/33 To add the name of the town-Baia Mare near the indication of the airport included in the comprehensive network.
Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1a add Las Palmas (ES) and Santa Cruz de Tenerife (ES)
Amendment 954 #
To add Iasi (RO) and Cluj Napoca (RO).
Amendment 957 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1a add Cagliari (IT), Heraklion (EL), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES) and Santa Cruz de Tenerife (ES)
Amendment 959 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1a To add: -conurbatia Galati-Braila Macin(România)
Amendment 961 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1a to add Cagliari (IT), Heraklion (EL), Las Palmas (ES) and Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Amendment 962 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1b add Gran Canaria (ES) and Tenerife (ES)
Amendment 963 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1b to add the airports of Bergamo – Orio al Serio Bologna – Borgo Panigale Genova – Sestri Napoli – Capodichino Palermo – Punta Raisi Torino – Caselle Venezia – Tessera to the core network
Amendment 964 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1b To add Bucharest (RO) and Timisoara (RO).
Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1b To add : - Bucuresti (România) - Timisoara (România) -Constanta (România) - Cluj (România)
Amendment 966 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1b add Cagliari (IT), Heraklion (EL), Las Palmas (ES), Tenerife (ES) and Málaga (ES)
Amendment 967 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 1b to add Gran Canaria and Tenerife Airports
Amendment 968 #
add Cagliari (IT), Heraklion (EL) Santander (ES), Vigo (ES) and Santa Cruz de Tenerife.
Amendment 975 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 Amendment 976 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 Amendment 977 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 a (new) Amendment 978 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 a (new) Amendment 979 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 a (new) Amendment 980 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 a (new) Inland ports ITALY Cremona Mantova Venezia Trieste Ravenna
Amendment 981 #
The list of inland ports belonging to the core network is added to this Annex.
Amendment 982 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 2 b (new) Rail-road terminals ITALY Ancona, Bari, Bologna, Cervignano, Firenze, Livorno, Milano, Napoli, Novara Orbassano (TO), Padova, Pomezia Nodo Roma, Verona
Amendment 983 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 3 Amendment 984 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Section 3 a (new) EuroVelo route network North – South Routes: 1 – Atlantic Coast Route: North Cape – Sagres 8,186 km 3 – Pilgrims Route: Trondheim – Santiago de Compostela 5,122 km 5 – Via Romea Francigena: London – Rome and Brindisi 3,900 km 7 – Sun Route: North Cape – Malta 7,409 km 9 – Baltic – Adriatic: Gdansk – Pula 1,930 km 11 – East Europe Route: North Cape – Athens 5,984 km 13 – Iron Curtain Trail: Barents Sea – Black Sea 9,000 km 15 – Rhine Route: Andermatt – Hoek van Holland 1,320 km West – East Routes: 2 – Capitals Route: Galway – Moscow 5,500 km 4 – Central Europe Route: Roscoff – Kiev 4,000 km 6 - Atlantic – Black Sea: Nantes – Constanta 4,448km 8 – Mediterranean Route: Cádiz – Athens and Cyprus 5,888 km Circuits: 10 – Baltic Sea Cycle Route (Hansa circuit): 7,980 km 12 – North Sea Cycle Route: 5,932 km
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Volume 30/33 to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Volume 31/33 to add the ‘Mosonmagyaróvár-Csorna- Szombathely-Nagykanizsa’ section of road to the core road network
Amendment 987 #
to add the ‘Gyır-Pápa-Celldömölk’ and ‘Zalaszentiván-Nagykanizsa- Murakeresztúr’ sections of railway to the core rail network
Amendment 988 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III – Volume 33/33 (new) To add a new map for the Republic of Moldova regarding inland waterway, freight and passenger railways, roads and airports.
Amendment 989 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III a (new) To add a new Annex IIIb featuring a list of the nodes of the comprehensive network (airports, seaports, inland ports, Rail-Road Terminals) with the aim of clarifying the maps of Annex I.
Amendment 990 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex III a (new) To add a new Annex IIIb featuring a list the nodes of the comprehensive network (airports, seaports, inland ports, RRT) with the aim of clarifying the maps of Annex I
source: PE-496.673
2012/11/08
TRAN
2 amendments...
Amendment 991 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – Volume 17/33 (new) to add the following airports to the core network: - Alicante - Gran Canaria - Málaga - Tenerife Sur - Santiago de Compostela
Amendment 992 #
to add Málaga (ES)
source: PE-500.436
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/21 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/22 |
|
docs/23 |
|
docs/23 |
|
docs/24 |
|
docs/24 |
|
docs/25 |
|
docs/25 |
|
docs/26 |
|
docs/26 |
|
docs/27 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0294&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0294&appLng=EN |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0492)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0492)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0008)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0008)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.704New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-489704_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE494.841New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-494841_EN.html |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE494.842New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-494842_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE496.673New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-496673_EN.html |
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE487.783&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-487783_EN.html |
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.666&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-492666_EN.html |
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE489.699&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-489699_EN.html |
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE500.436New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-500436_EN.html |
docs/13 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20131118&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2013-11-18-TOC_EN.html |
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
committees/0/date |
|
committees/1/date |
|
committees/3/date |
|
committees/4/date |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1212/COM_SEC(2011)1212_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1212/COM_SEC(2011)1212_EN.pdf |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/13/body |
EC
|
docs/18 |
|
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-12&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0012_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0464New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0464_EN.html |
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1212/COM_SEC(2011)1212_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1212/COM_SEC(2011)1212_EN.pdf |
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/18 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/07667New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R1315New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R1315 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
procedure/title |
Old
Trans-European transport network: guidelinesNew
Trans-European transport network: development |
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0650:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0650:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=0650New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0650/COM_COM(2011)0650(COR2)_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|