Activities of Ivana MALETIĆ related to 2017/2053(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate) HR
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the reform of the European Union’s system of own resources
Amendments (7)
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at reducforming the share of the GNI-based contributionGNI-based own resource system, which is residual in nature; arguemphasises that this reduction should be compensated for by the use of genuine own resourcese decision regarding the compensation should be based on the outcome of Brexit;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that preference should be given to genuine European own resources,; such as a tax basedtresses the need to avoid creating an additional tax burden on EU citizens and expanding the regressive nature of the EU’s own the common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB) and a contribution based on a definitive VAT system,resources system; welcome the High Level Group’s proposal for their vision of the VAT-based own resource with the aim to make it simple, to lower the administrative costs and to strengthen the link with EU VAT policy and actual VAT receipts; underlines that all correction mechanism on the revenue side should be abolished thereby delivering a fairer system for European citizens with respect to the EU budget;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Advocates the establishment of a budgetary capacity for the Eurozone that would not overlap with the existing policies and make the budget fragmented, and that would perform functions of macroeconomic stabiliszation and bring about economic and social convergencstrengthening the financial system in the whole Europe; considers, moreover, that this capacity shcould be financed through own resources specific to the euro area, such as a tax on financial transactions, a bank levy and a share of the ECB’s profits;a bank levy and a share of the ECB’s profits; stresses however that linkage between specific revenues and expenditures should be avoided in the budget.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that the EU should be able to issue zero-risk debt asseintroduce adequate mechanisms and instruments in order to offset the volatility in own resources’ revenues;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses, with a view to achieving common EU and Eurozone economic governance objectives, the need for adequate financial support, which should be financed by genuine own resourceprogram budgeting and clear link between budget spending and strategic goals in order to ensuresupport democratic legitimacy;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Supports the creation of a dedicated budget line to supportuse of technical assistance to help the adoption of the euro by Member States not yet part of the euro area, but calls for it to be made separate from the Eurozone’s budgetary capacity; considers that the budgetary capacity of the Eurozone should be excluded from ceiling calculations for commitments and payments under the multiannual financial framework;; stresses that the most important element for joining the Eurozone is economic and social convergence, therefore calls for strong and efficient cohesion policy which will, among other priorities, support implementation of economic policy mix to reach high development, growth and job creation.
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. SupportsNotes proposal of the pEuroposal to createean Commission for the creation of the post, within the Commission, of European Finance Minister, who would be tasked with managing the budgetary capacity and ensuring full democratic accountability of the EU’s economic governance;ensure effective coordination of economic and fiscal policies.