BETA


2017/2053(INI) Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead BUDG LEWANDOWSKI Janusz (icon: PPE PPE), DEPREZ Gérard (icon: ALDE ALDE) VIOTTI Daniele (icon: S&D S&D), KÖLMEL Bernd (icon: ECR ECR), TRÜPEL Helga (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD), ZANNI Marco (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion AFCO BRESSO Mercedes (icon: S&D S&D) Morten MESSERSCHMIDT (icon: ECR ECR), Cristian Dan PREDA (icon: PPE PPE), Jasenko SELIMOVIC (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion AGRI CAPUTO Nicola (icon: S&D S&D) Ivan JAKOVČIĆ (icon: ALDE ALDE), Giulia MOI (icon: EFDD EFDD), Miguel VIEGAS (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion ENVI BELET Ivo (icon: PPE PPE) Anneli JÄÄTTEENMÄKI (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion INTA VAN DE CAMP Wim (icon: PPE PPE) Marietje SCHAAKE (icon: ALDE ALDE), Joachim STARBATTY (icon: ECR ECR)
Committee Opinion ECON MORGANO Luigi (icon: S&D S&D) Enrique CALVET CHAMBON (icon: ALDE ALDE), Bernd LUCKE (icon: ECR ECR), Ivana MALETIĆ (icon: PPE PPE), Miguel VIEGAS (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion CONT ALI Nedzhmi (icon: ALDE ALDE) Georgi PIRINSKI (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion EMPL
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/08/30
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/03/14
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/03/14
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 442 votes to 166, with 88 abstentions, a resolution on reform of the European Union’s system of own resources.

Parliament called for the future multi-annual framework policy (MFF) proposed by the Commission to include ambitious proposals to revise the Own Resources Decision . It underlined that both the expenditure and the revenue side of the next MFF will be treated as a single package in the upcoming negotiations between the Council and Parliament. It stated that no agreement will be reached on the MFF without corresponding headway being made on own resources.

Parliament favoured the creation of a new transparent, simpler and fairer system of own resources , based on elements of the current system when they have proved their effectiveness, in order to provide stable finances at Union level. In this context, it stressed the need to link revenues to policy objectives , in particular to the single market, the energy union, and the environment, climate and transport policies, focusing on policies with European added value.

Principles governing the setting-up of a new own resources system : underlining that new own resources cannot all be introduced at the same time, Members proposed to reform of the system of own resources through a two-step approach :

by introducing less technically complex own resources whose collection is easily manageable at a reasonable cost; by gradually introducing each additional new own resource, on the basis of a fixed timetable until all have reached cruising speed.

The introduction of new own resources should have a dual purpose:

1. to bring about a substantial reduction (aiming at 40 %) in the proportion of GNI-based contributions , thus creating savings for Member State budgets; and

2. to enable the financing of a higher level of EU spending under the post-2020 MFF , including covering the gap resulting from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom. The new own resources do not aim to increase the overall fiscal burden for the EU taxpayer, who should not be affected by the introduction of new own resources.

Members recommended:

the abolition of all rebates and corrections , while ensuring fair treatment between Member States; retaining traditional own resources , namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, as a source of revenue for the EU budget; maintaining the contribution based on GNI but only as a residual and balancing resource for the Union budget, which would put an end to the budgetary logic of "fair return".

Basket of possible new own resources : the introduction of new own resources should serve three purposes:

1. consolidate the single market, increase its transparency and improve the level playing field;

2. reduce financial speculation and strengthen tax fairness in sectors that use aggressive tax planning instruments or aggressive tax optimisation;

3. promote the energy transition and the fight against global warming.

Parliament invited the Commission to examine the introduction of new own resources based on:

- A revised value-added tax (VAT) : this resource currently represents around 12 % of EU revenue. However, that the current system has serious shortcomings: the resource is calculated on a statistical basis; it is unnecessarily complex and has no direct link to the citizens.

Members favour setting up a uniform levy rate (1% to 2%) on revenue from the reformed VAT collected entirely by Member State administrations as a Union own resource. The Commission was asked, pending the adoption of the relevant VAT legislation, to present a proposal for a reformed own resource based on VAT as part of its upcoming legislative package on EU own resources. Such a proposal should take account of the main outcomes of the VAT reform currently under discussion.

- A share of corporate tax : Members share the analysis of the High Level Group on Own Resources that a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) can serve as a basis for a new own resource. They asked the Commission to propose the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of Member States’ revenue generated from the CCCTB. They were in favour of setting a uniform levy rate on the revenue from the CCCTB, to be collected as an own resource.

- A financial transaction tax (FTT) at European level : Members encouraged the efforts undertaken under enhanced cooperation by a group of 11 Member States with a view to establishing financial transaction tax (FTT), following the 2011 Commission proposal. They called, therefore, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of a chosen method of taxation of financial activities.

- Taxation of companies in the digital sector : Members called, in principle, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget to be levied on transactions in the digital economy, even if it is too early to decide on the exact arrangements for the establishment of such a resource. They believed, nevertheless, that any arrangements made by the EU authorities, such as registration or monitoring systems or regulatory mechanisms, should immediately permit the collection of duties or levies for the benefit of the Union budget on the basis of their European added value.

- Environmental tax and levies : Members emphasised the importance of green taxation as a particularly suitable mechanism for contributing to the Union's own resources. The Commission was invited to further incorporate the proposals for additional ecological own resources, which are in line with certain Union policies such as those on energy (energy tax), environment and climate (carbon border adjustment mechanism, plastic tax and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)) and transport (road fuel and air ticket taxes), in order to promote additional future Union own resources.

Parliament called for a significant share of auctioning revenues of the emissions trading scheme (ETS-EU) allowances from Phase 4 (2021) onwards to be considered as a new EU own resource. It invited the Commission to consider the introduction at EU level of a levy on plastic and single-use items, with a view to encouraging the use of more sustainable alternatives.

Other sources of revenue : Parliament reiterated its position that any revenue resulting from fines imposed on companies for breaching EU competition law or linked to late payments of national contributions to the EU budget should constitute extra revenue for the EU budget without entailing a corresponding reduction in GNI contributions.

Members called for the creation of a special reserve in the EU budget which will be progressively filled up by all types of unforeseen other revenue and duly carried over in order to provide additional spending possibilities when needs arise. They considered that this reserve should be earmarked for the MFF special instruments.

Documents
2018/03/14
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/03/13
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/02/26
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Budgets adopted an own-initiative report by co-rapporteurs Gérard DEPREZ (ADLE, BE) and Janusz LEWANDOWSKI (EPP, PL) on reform of the European Union’s system of own resources.

Members favoured the creation of a new transparent, simpler and fairer system of own resources, based on elements of the current system when they have proved their effectiveness, in order to provide stable finances at Union level. In this context, they stressed the need to link revenues to policy objectives , in particular to the single market, the energy union, and the environment, climate and transport policies.

Principles governing the setting-up of a new own resources system : Members considered that the reform of the system of own resources could be achieved through a two-step approach: (i) first, by introducing less technically complex own resources whose collection is easily manageable at a reasonable cost, and then (ii), by gradually introducing each additional new own resource, on the basis of a fixed timetable until all have reached cruising speed.

The introduction of new own resources should have a dual purpose:

1. to bring about a substantial reduction (aiming at 40 %) in the proportion of GNI-based contributions, thus creating savings for Member State budgets; and

2. to enable the financing of an higher level of EU spending under the post-2020 MFF , including covering the gap resulting from the withdrawal of the United Kingdom.

Members recommended:

the abolition of all rebates and corrections , while ensuring fair treatment between Member States; retaining traditional own resources , namely customs duties, agricultural duties and the sugar and isoglucose levies, as a source of revenue for the EU budget; maintaining the contribution based on GNI but only as a residual and balancing resource for the Union budget, which would put an end to the budgetary logic of "fair return".

Basket of possible new own resources: the Commission is invited to examine the introduction of new own resources based on:

a revised value-added tax (VAT) : Members favour setting up a uniform levy rate (1% to 2%) on revenue from the reformed VAT collected entirely by Member State administrations as a Union own resource. the Commission was asked, pending the adoption of the relevant VAT legislation, to present a proposal for a reformed own resource based on VAT as part of its upcoming legislative package on EU own resources; a share of corporate tax : Members share the analysis of the High Level Group on Own Resources that a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) can serve as a basis for a new own resource . They asked the Commission to propose the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of Member States’ revenue generated from the CCCTB. They were in favour of setting a uniform levy rate on the revenue from the CCCTB, to be collected as an own resource; a financial transaction tax (FTT) at European level : Members encouraged the efforts undertaken under enhanced cooperation by a group of 11 Member States with a view to establishing financial transaction tax (FTT), following the 2011 Commission proposal. They called, therefore, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget, to be calculated on the basis of a chosen method of taxation of financial activities; taxation of companies in the digital sector : the committee called, in principle, for the creation of a new own resource for the Union budget to be levied on transactions in the digital economy, even if it is too early to decide on the exact arrangements for the establishment of such a resource. It believed, nevertheless, that any arrangements made by the EU authorities, such as registration or monitoring systems or regulatory mechanisms, should immediately permit the collection of duties or levies for the benefit of the Union budget on the basis of their European added value; environmental tax and levies : stressing the need to encourage energy transition and the fight against global warming, Members emphasised the importance of green taxation as a particularly suitable mechanism for contributing to the Union's own resources. The Commission was invited to further incorporate the proposals for additional ecological own resources, which are in line with certain Union policies such as those on energy (energy tax), environment and climate (carbon border adjustment mechanism, plastic tax and the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)) and transport (road fuel and air ticket taxes), in order to promote additional future Union own resources.

The report called for a significant share of auctioning revenues of the emissions trading scheme (ETS-EU) allowances from Phase 4 (2021) onwards to be considered as a new EU own resource. It invites the Commission to consider the introduction at EU level of a levy on plastic and single-use items, with a view to encouraging the use of more sustainable alternatives.

Documents
2018/02/22
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/01/31
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/01/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/24
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/01/10
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/12/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/11/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/10/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2017/05/30
   EP - BRESSO Mercedes (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2017/05/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/05/03
   EP - VAN DE CAMP Wim (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2017/04/25
   EP - LEWANDOWSKI Janusz (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2017/04/25
   EP - DEPREZ Gérard (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2017/04/18
   EP - ALI Nedzhmi (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in CONT
2017/04/12
   EP - BELET Ivo (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2017/04/05
   EP - CAPUTO Nicola (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in AGRI
2017/03/21
   EP - MORGANO Luigi (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ECON

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 16 14/03/2018 13:04:27.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 600, +: 63, 0: 10
CY EL IE LU EE MT LV SI SE LT PT SK FI HR CZ HU DK BG AT BE NL ES IT RO PL FR GB DE
Total
5
20
6
6
6
6
7
7
17
9
17
9
13
11
18
18
12
16
17
20
25
46
63
31
47
66
65
89
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
41

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: NI NI
17

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Czechia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
4
icon: ECR ECR
62

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
169

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Hungary S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
203

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 18 14/03/2018 13:04:43.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 465, +: 214, 0: 15
GB SE CY NL EL DK MT EE IE CZ FI LU PL LT LV SK SI PT BE HR AT HU BG FR IT RO ES DE
Total
68
17
6
25
18
12
6
4
9
21
13
5
47
11
7
10
8
19
21
11
17
18
17
69
64
31
48
90
icon: ECR ECR
60

Cyprus ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1

Romania NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
178

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Czechia S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Finland S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4
icon: PPE PPE
206

United Kingdom PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 51 14/03/2018 13:04:56.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 519, +: 105, 0: 64
EL EE LU LT DK SI LV IE HR BE CY MT BG FI SK FR PT SE AT HU CZ NL ES RO IT PL GB DE
Total
18
5
6
11
12
8
7
9
11
21
6
6
16
13
9
69
19
17
15
17
21
25
47
31
64
47
67
89
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Sweden ALDE

Against (1)

3

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
50

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (2)

6

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

6
icon: NI NI
17

Denmark NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3
3

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
32

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
58

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: S&D S&D
175

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Finland S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
204

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 53 14/03/2018 13:05:26.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: +: 534, -: 127, 0: 36
DE FR ES IT RO EL CZ PT BG BE PL HU LT HR SI AT SK LV LU EE GB IE FI NL MT DK CY SE
Total
91
69
48
62
32
20
21
19
17
21
47
18
11
11
8
17
10
7
6
6
67
9
13
24
6
12
6
17
icon: PPE PPE
206

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Malta S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Denmark S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Germany ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

6

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
33

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

3

Romania NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1
3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Denmark NI

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

A8-0041/2018 - Gérard Deprez et Janusz Lewandowski - Am 43 14/03/2018 13:05:39.000 #

2018/03/14 Outcome: -: 539, +: 140, 0: 14
GB DK IE CY MT LU LV EE NL FI SK SI HR AT LT BE PT EL CZ HU SE BG IT FR RO PL ES DE
Total
68
12
9
6
6
6
6
6
25
13
9
8
11
17
10
21
19
17
20
18
17
17
64
69
32
47
47
91
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
33

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Slovakia ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

United Kingdom NI

2

Denmark NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

Romania NI

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (2)

6

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

4

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Romania ALDE

3
4
icon: S&D S&D
177

Denmark S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

4

Hungary S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
205

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Italy PPE