6 Amendments of Jana TOOM related to 2020/2017(INI)
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to make better use of data and AI-based technologies and Calls on the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders, both public and private, to closely cooperate on necessary reforms in the educational sector so as to make educational systems fit for the digital age; stresses that general public awareness of AI at all levels, including awareness of AI risks relating to privacy and bias, is essential for preparing everyone to make informed decisions;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Welcomes the Commission’s focus on advanced skills while reiterating the importance of the basic skills; welcomes the upcoming update of the Skills Agenda in terms of everyone benefiting from the EU digital transformation; calls on the Commission to clarify the definition of AI skills in relation to digital skills; underlines the importance to diversify the technology sector and encourage students, in particular girls, to enrol in STEM courses;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Underlines the need for explicability of AI algorithms and the possibility of human verification and for due process, including the right of appeal, especially for decisions taken within the framework of prerogatives of public power; notes that the terms and conditions should always include the community guidelines as well as the procedure of appeal;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools should always respect fundamental rights, especially freedom of expression, and should not lead to a general monitoring of the internet; stresses that algorithms should be used only as a flagging mechanism in content moderation, subject to human intervention, as AI is unable to reliably distinguish between legal, illegal and harmful content;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 b (new)
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the use of AI in the area of digitalised cultural heritage
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to allocate scientific and financial resources to motivate and attract talented people in AI sector to both come and stay working in the EU;