2020/2017(INI) Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | CULT |
VERHEYEN Sabine ( EPP)
|
GARCÍA DEL BLANCO Ibán ( S&D),
JOVEVA Irena ( Renew),
KOLAJA Marcel ( Verts/ALE),
ANDERSON Christine ( ID),
MELBĀRDE Dace ( ECR),
MICHELS Martina ( GUE/NGL)
|
| Committee Opinion | FEMM |
CARVALHO Maria da Graça ( EPP)
|
Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD ( Verts/ALE),
Maria-Manuel LEITÃO-MARQUES ( S&D)
|
| Committee Opinion | IMCO |
VAN SPARRENTAK Kim ( Verts/ALE)
|
Anne-Sophie PELLETIER ( GUE/NGL),
Alessandra BASSO ( ID)
|
| Committee Opinion | JURI |
DZHAMBAZKI Angel ( ECR)
|
Antonius MANDERS ( PPE),
Emmanuel MAUREL ( GUE/NGL),
Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ ( RE),
Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO ( S&D)
|
| Committee Opinion | LIBE |
KOVAŘÍK Ondřej ( Renew)
|
Paul TANG ( S&D),
Gwendoline DELBOS-CORFIELD ( Verts/ALE),
Anne-Sophie PELLETIER ( GUE/NGL)
|
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
2021/09/22
EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2021/05/19
EP - Results of vote in Parliament
Documents
2021/05/19
EP - Decision by Parliament
Details
The European Parliament adopted by 623 votes to 12, with 61 abstentions, a resolution on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector.
Members consider that the development, deployment and use of AI in the fields of education, culture and audiovisual media must fully respect the fundamental rights, freedoms and values enshrined in the EU treaties, in particular human dignity, protection of privacy and personal data, non-discrimination, freedom of expression and information, cultural diversity and intellectual property rights.
Education, culture and the audiovisual sector are areas where the use of AI and related technologies is sensitive, as they may affect fundamental rights and values. Members therefore stressed the importance of respecting ethical principles in these areas when developing, deploying and using AI and related technologies, including software and algorithms and the data they use and produce.
The Commission is invited to present a general regulatory framework, which applies to all applications of AI, and to complement it with sector-specific rules.
Education
Parliament stressed the importance of ensuring EU-wide mastery of basic digital and AI skills by developing training opportunities for teachers. The Commission is called upon to make digital skills, media literacy and AI skills priorities in its action plan, while paying particular attention to children and young people in precarious situations who need special support in the field of digital education.
Members called on the Commission to include education in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI systems , given the particularly sensitive nature of data on pupils, students and other learners. They stressed that the deployment of AI applications in the field of education must not only allow for the participation of educators, learners and society at large, but also take into account the needs of each and the expected benefits, in order to ensure the appropriate and ethical use of AI.
The Commission is invited to take into account AI and robotics initiatives in the educational field in its forthcoming legislative proposals on AI. For their part, Member States should invest in digital equipment for schools and use EU funds for this purpose.
Cultural heritage
Parliament stressed that AI technologies can play an important role in the preservation, restoration, documentation, analysis, promotion and management of tangible and intangible cultural heritage. AI technologies can increase the visibility of cultural diversity in Europe by offering cultural institutions new opportunities to create innovative tools to document cultural heritage sites and make them more accessible.
In this context, Members stressed the importance of exchanging best practices between Member States, educational and cultural institutions and other stakeholders.
Culture and creativity
The resolution stressed the need to establish a coherent vision of AI technologies within the cultural and creative sectors at EU level. Member States are invited to focus more on culture in their national AI strategies to ensure that the cultural and creative sectors choose to innovate and remain competitive, and to ensure the safeguarding and promotion of cultural diversity at EU level in the new digital context.
Members stressed the importance of clarifying the conditions for the use of copyright-protected content as input data (images, music, films, databases, etc.) and in the production of cultural and audiovisual output data, whether created by humans with the help of AI or generated autonomously by AI technologies. They called on the Commission and Member States to address the issue of AI-generated content and the challenges it poses for authorship and copyright infringement.
Audiovisual sector
AI is often used to enable automatic decision-making algorithms to deliver and organise the cultural and creative content presented to users. These algorithms are opaque to users.
Members called for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing to be easy to explain and transparent, to enable consumers to understand these processes in a correct and complete way, and to ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory. Consumers should be informed when they interact with an automated decision process and their choices and behaviour should not be restricted.
The Commission is invited to establish a clear ethical framework for the use of AI-based technologies in the media to avoid all forms of discrimination and to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content across the EU, based on responsible, transparent and inclusive algorithms, while respecting individual choices and preferences.
Online disinformation: deep-fakes
Parliament stressed the importance of ensuring online and offline media pluralism to guarantee the quality, diversity and reliability of the information available. The Commission is called upon to assess the impact of AI-related technologies in the creation of deep-fakes, to establish appropriate legal frameworks to govern their creation, production or distribution for malicious purposes, and to propose recommendations for action against any threat using AI against the principle of free and fair elections and democracy.
Documents
2021/05/18
EP - Debate in Parliament
Documents
2021/04/19
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2021/04/19
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Documents
2021/03/31
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2021/03/16
EP - Vote in committee
2020/10/08
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2020/09/22
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/09/14
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/07/30
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2020/07/06
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2020/02/18
EP - VAN SPARRENTAK Kim (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2020/02/18
EP - DZHAMBAZKI Angel (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2020/01/16
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2020/01/16
EP - Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament
2020/01/15
EP - CARVALHO Maria da Graça (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in FEMM
2020/01/13
EP - KOVAŘÍK Ondřej (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in LIBE
2019/12/17
EP - VERHEYEN Sabine (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)507
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T9-0238/2021
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0127/2021
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A9-0127/2021
- Committee opinion: PE650.370
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE658.907
- Committee opinion: PE652.373
- Committee opinion: PE646.839
- Committee draft report: PE655.862
- Committee opinion: PE648.349
- Committee opinion: PE648.349
- Committee draft report: PE655.862
- Committee opinion: PE646.839
- Committee opinion: PE652.373
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE658.907
- Committee opinion: PE650.370
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A9-0127/2021
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2021)507
Activities
- Fabio Massimo CASTALDO
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Maria da Graça CARVALHO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Angel DZHAMBAZKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Martina MICHELS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paul TANG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marcel KOLAJA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beata MAZUREK
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
L’intelligence artificielle dans les domaines de l’éducation, de la culture et de l’audiovisuel - Artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector - Künstliche Intelligenz in der Bildung, der Kultur und dem audiovisuellen Bereich - A9-0127/2021 - Sabine Verheyen - Vote unique #
2021/05/19 Outcome: +: 623, 0: 61, -: 12
The Left
NI| Amendments | Dossier |
| 583 |
2020/2017(INI)
2020/04/15
IMCO
120 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Whereas AI has the potential to offer solutions for day-to-day challenges of the education sector such as the personalisation of learning, monitoring learning difficulties and automation of subject-specific content/knowledge, providing better professional training and support the transition to a digital society;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has
Amendment 100 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, and on platforms disseminating cultural and creative content, to be transparent, in order to give consumers and users insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to easily and reversibly opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers an accurate and comprehensive insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory or incomplete; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers an accurate insight into these processes and content, and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 105 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation
Amendment 106 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls for audiovisual platforms to be responsible for their content in order to protect the rights of both consumers and pupils, ensuring that their fundamental rights are not infringed, and in order to prevent fake news and disinformation;
Amendment 108 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Considers that, since automatic translation tools have made so much progress, content providers and commercial digital platforms should be encouraged to provide subtitling of educational and cultural programmes in the languages of the European Union;
Amendment 109 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes that the access to data is a challenge that stakeholders face and might have an impact on developing and AI ecosystem; points toward anachronic legislation like the Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases and calls for its removal.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; considers that all products and services developed with public funding should be published under open-source licenses and be accessible to the general public;
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. recalls how Artificial intelligence could be a perfect tool to allow a wide audience of users to remotely enjoy public cultural heritage (e.g. exhibitions or museums) for information purposes, "tourism", but also research; therefore encourages cultural institutions to exploit the potential of AI to make their contents widely accessible;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Suggests that audiovisual content for educational purposes should be catalogued and classified according to age groups in order to facilitate an effective selection of the most suitable contents;
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses the need to improve the digital skills of educators, learners and wider society, whilst having regard to ´A Europe fit for the digital age´; emphasises that the AI solutions, products and services for the public sector and specifically for the education, must be human-centric or have human-in- command approach; recognises that the AI market amounts to around USD 664 million and is expected to grow to USD 38.8 billion by 2025; expects that the EU enhances its approach to promoting investment and financing of new AI solutions; underlines the need for constant strengthening of the single market and avoiding its fragmentation; stresses the need to integrate AI services into the Digital single market strategy;
Amendment 114 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines that consumers shall be informed when they are interacting with an automated decision process and that their choices and performance are not limited; stresses that the use of AI mechanisms on commercial surveillance of consumers shall be countered, even if it concerns "free services", ensuring that it is strictly in line with fundamental rights and GDPR; all regulatory changes shall take in consideration the impact on vulnerable consumers.
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Points out to the fact that creations made by AI, if marketed, could create distortions in the cultural and creative sector, affecting pricing and remuneration to the detriment of human creators.
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Points out that the deployment, development and implementation of AI must make it easier for consumers and pupils with some form of disability to use tools to access audiovisual content;
Amendment 117 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Considers that commercial digital platforms should be encouraged to provide access to their programmes in all the languages in which their content is disseminated in Europe, i.e. without blocking access to certain languages according to the geographical location of the consumer when the oral or written version is available for other countries of dissemination.
Amendment 118 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. supports the use of AI related to the dissemination of texts and manuscripts, especially ancient ones, through the web, to preserve them from destruction but at the same time to make them accessible to a wide mass of users, including researchers, experts and scholars.
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Calls on the authorities and private education providers to include in the education curriculum content for building digital skills in an increasingly digital society, underlines the need for upskilling future workforce; recognises the benefit of forecasting jobs that will be disrupted by digital technology such as automation, digitalisation and AI.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to support public procurement in intelligent digital services, to encourage public authorities to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically and delivers real improvements for those concerned, at an affordable cost to the taxpayer;
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Points out that the AI systems that are developed, implemented and used in the European Union, in any of the three sectors referred to in this report, must reflect the EU's cultural diversity and multilingualism.
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; stresses the need to take into account the technological, regulatory and social aspects of the introduction of AI in education;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs, especially of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged, and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully, lawfully and ethically;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, parents, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners, schoolchildren and students and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, th
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, teachers, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 a (new) -1 a. Whereas AI could have practical applications in reducing the administrative work of educators and education institutions and to free up time for their core teaching and learning activities;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Welcomes the use of AI-based products in education and the potential of technology to make high-quality education available to all EU pupils, especially in sparsely populated and socio- economically vulnerable areas;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Acknowledges that although development of AI and automated decision-making processes may present challenges for consumer trust and welfare, it's a major tool that can benefit EU consumers and companies to boost the economy and the internal market; welcomes the human-centric approach of AI, as a tool to serve people with the ultimate aim of increasing well-being;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Underlines that algorithmic systems can be an enabler for reducing the digital divide in an accelerated way, but unequal deployment is of nature of creating new divides or accelerate the deepening of the existing ones; calls for measures and investments meant to ensure the cohesion and sharing of the benefits of AI and related technologies;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Stresses the importance to avoid a purely notional and sterile use of AI in education which would undermine educational bonds between pupils, students and other learners and teachers, as well as between children and parents; the human dimension of education must remain at the forefront;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; points out, accordingly, that appropriate conformity assessments are needed, to verify and ensure that all the provisions concerning high-risk applications are complied with, including test, inspection and certification requirements; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed, to ensure that they are reliable and accurate, to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases based on gender, ethnic and racial origin, religion or beliefs, disability, age or sexual orientation;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the public and private education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 b (new) -1 b. Whereas the application of AI in education raises concerns around the ethical use of data, learners’ rights, data access, protection of personal data and therefore entails fundamental rights’ risks such as the creation of stereotyped models of learners' profiles and behaviour that could lead to discrimination or risks of doing harm by the scaling-up of bad pedagogical practices;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners in order to promote the public good and the public well-being of society; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender, religious, cultural and national stereotypes and other biases;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 c (new) -1 c. Whereas AI applications are omnipresent in the audio-visual sector, in particular on audio-visual content platforms;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that all children are entitled to a high-quality public education at every level; calls, therefore, for the development, deployment and use of high- quality AI systems that provide pupils at all levels with high-quality educational tools and emphasises that the deployment of new AI systems in schools should not widen the digital divide in society; calls on the Commission to examine how to implement these systems, particularly in the most vulnerable educational establishments and in depopulated areas with no or poor Internet access;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Draws the Commission's attention to the risks inherent in the use of new digital technologies in primary and secondary education, and even in preschooling; recalls that minors should be given special protection in relation to the digital content to which they are likely to be exposed, and in relation to the use that new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, may make of their personal data, especially in schools or educational activities; stresses that the use of digital resources in education has produced documented negative effects on pupils’ attention, development and capabilities; calls therefore on the Commission to limit the deployment of artificial intelligence to higher education and research in cases where learners would be liable come into contact with it;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Urges the Commission to preserve and promote the plurality of reference theories upon which to base the development of AI systems;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals in this area, including ethical aspects in their curriculums, and supporting underrepresented groups in the field; as well as creating incentives for highly skilled professionals to seek work within the European Union;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Highlights the increasing need to ensure mutual recognition of a minimum level of professional qualifications on AI skills across the EU, as several member states are upgrading their educational offer with AI-related skills and putting in place specific curricula for AI developers; stresses the need for them to be in line with the assessment list of the Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI; calls on the Commission to build on its own proposal in the White Paper on AI, in order to put forward a framework in this sense;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission to establish a method whereby the manufacturers of devices that use AI can control content by means of a data tag or a similar means of providing information which allows users to make free and informed decisions, given that many pupils will be minors whose access to certain unsuitable content must be restricted on account of their age;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Expresses concern over the use, in some local areas, of AI applications for remote biometric identification purposes; points out that the use of intrusive surveillance technologies, particularly in high-risk sectors such as education, may infringe fundamental rights as it implies the use of sensitive data;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Urges Member States which have not done so to modernise their education systems with a stronger emphasis on STEAM subjects in order to secure schoolchildren with the minimum necessary skills needed in an increasingly digital society;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 d (new) -1 d. Whereas recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing have the potential to improve the consumers’ experience, but come with risks such as selective presentation of content based on gender or other grounds, ever more extreme content presented in order to increase the time spent on the platform and a selective presentation of news;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good); stresses the importance of inclusion of multiple AI providers in order to facilitate competition and widen consumer choices; encourages open source systems in order to foster innovation and advances in the EU;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be accessible, interoperable and of high quality, and to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to further fragmentation of the internal market, unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities, in the privacy compliant manner, so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities and monitored by them, so it can be used in the development of curricula and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a common good);
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; expresses its concerns that telecommunication infrastructures in some regions across the European Union are lacking, which limits the accessibility to products and services that rely on AI and calls on the Commission to deploy sustained efforts in ameliorating telecommunication infrastructures in such regions, particularly with regards to the public education sector;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companies; stresses that this may lead to unequal and insufficient access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Expresses its concern that
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the dependence created in this way on a small number of educational technology players is liable to harm many suppliers, equipment producers or participants, both in the physical resources sector and among producers of knowledge, including as regards the previous generation of IT tools; stresses that it could also lead to unfair differentials in access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice, as these risks also arise in the field of culture; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so that it can be used in the development of curricula and teaching methods (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to public education providers for free, and because education is a public asset);
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the fundamental role played by human beings in passing on knowledge and the risk of a digital divide in access to digital educational content;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses the need for governments and educational institutions to rethink and rework educational programmes to prepare learners and consumers for the increasing presence of AI in all aspects of human activity;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Urges the Commission to combat market practices resulting in unjustified monopolisation of data collection and restrictions on data access in the field of educational technology services; calls on the Commission to ensure fair access to data for all companies, in particular SMEs and cultural and creative companies, which play an essential role in sustaining social cohesion and cultural diversity in Europe as well as democratic values;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers therefore that the use of AI in the acquisition of knowledge and skills is a tool, access to which should be made available to as many people as possible in order to avoid aggravating existing inequalities;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners; calls for the implementation of a research and development plan for artificial intelligence focusing on education, knowledge and culture which can stop the brain drain and loss of skills from Europe; calls also for facilitation of the acquisition of cognitive skills and for the gulf that exists in our societies with regard to access to the means to acquire such skills to be reduced;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers,
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; highlights the added value of promoting public private partnerships to secure this objective and deploy the full potential of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; points out that the legal framework governing AI in the education sector should particularly provide for legally binding measures and standards to prevent practices from the different private and public actors involved that would undermine fundamental rights and freedoms, and to ensure the development of trustworthy, ethical and technically robust AI applications;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, creating level and fair playing field among AI solution providers to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure maximum transparency, consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination, environmental sustainability and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination
Amendment 76 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as diversity, non- discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Recalls the importance of promoting, encouraging and supporting in a tailored and inclusive manner a level of media, digital and information literacy that enables the competent and critical consideration of and use of algorithmic systems;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Encourages the establishment of guidelines for AI public procurement in order to ensure accountability, transparency and sustainability;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically; stresses the importance of this deployment for reskilling and upskilling the European labour market, and particularly those of the culture and audiovisual sectors, which will be severely impacted by the COVID crisis;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filters; stresses the key requirements of AI applications such as accountability including auditability and reporting of negative impacts; emphasizes that transparency should also include traceability and explainability of the relevant systems; reminds, that AI applications must adhere to internal and external safety protocols which should be technically accurate and robust in nature; this should extend to operation in normal, unknown and unpredictable situations alike;
Amendment 83 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines th
Amendment 85 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines th
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines th
Amendment 87 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 88 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically and leads towards improving and benefiting the public sector; recognizes the need to integrate digital tools, services and products such as robotics and machine learning; recognises that children are vulnerable group in terms of influencing their behaviour; emphasises that AI applications in the education sector must be applied reasonably with adequate safeguards and human-centric approach;
Amendment 90 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared;
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the
Amendment 92 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared;
Amendment 93 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Underlines the unreliability of the current automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filters to prevent the dissemination of illegal content on online platforms;
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 96 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls for a level playing field and fair balance between audiovisual service providers and online platforms;
Amendment 97 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Stresses the importance of the human oversight on the deployment of AI technologies in order to guarantee the respect of the human rights, ethical principles and correct use of algorithms to avoid unfair bias; recalls that EU funding should in particular support AI solutions that are in line with the Ethics Guidelines;
Amendment 98 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services
Amendment 99 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers insight into these processes and ensure that personalised services are not
source: 650.362
2020/05/27
LIBE
69 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the use of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that AI may give rise to biases and thus to various forms of discrimination
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that AI may give rise to biases and thus to various forms of discrimination; in this regard, recalls that everyone’s rights must be ensured and that AI initiatives that lead to discriminatory processes should not be allowed; emphasizes that AI technologies should aim at not reflecting any sort of profiling bias whether regarding any identity, race, age, colour, gender or sexuality or disability;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that AI may give rise to biases and thus to various forms of discrimination; in this regard, recalls that everyone’s rights must be ensured and that AI initiatives that lead to discriminatory processes should not be allowed; notes, however, that AI initiatives can also be used positively to counter traditional forms of discrimination including lack of access to services;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Recalls that AI may give rise to biases and thus to various forms of discrimination, especially where the training data used for machine-learning and AI is already biased in that it reflects existing discrimination in society; in this regard, recalls that everyone’s rights must be ensured and that AI initiatives that lead to discriminatory processes should not be allowed;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Calls on the Commission to consider how AI initiatives can be used specifically to improve the quality of life and access to services for persons living with disabilities in line with the objectives laid out in the EU Accessibility Act and to enable more inclusion;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and opportunities, while at the same time posing risks regarding equal access to education and learning equalities; expresses its concerns about lacking telecommunication infrastructures in some regions across the European Union, which limits the accessibility to the internet and calls on the Commission to deploy sustained efforts in ameliorating telecommunication infrastructures, particularly with regards to the public education sector; calls for the non- discriminatory use of AI in the education sector; recalls the risks and discrimination arising from recently developed AI tools used for school admission;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and opportunities, while at the same time posing risks regarding equal access to education and learning equalities; calls for the non-discriminatory use of AI in the education sector;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and opportunities, while at the same time posing risks regarding equal access to education and learning equalities; calls for the non-discriminatory use of AI in the education sector; recalls the risks and discrimination arising from recently developed AI tools used for school admission; underlines the importance of working with AI technology providers to address persistent loopholes that facilitate discrimination;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the use of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors should respect fundamental rights, freedoms and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; welcomes the Commission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in this regard, and invites the Commission to include the educational sector, limited to areas posing significant risks, in the
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and opportunities, while at the same time posing risks regarding equal access to education and learning equalities at increasingly younger age with vulnerable and historically disadvantaged; calls for the non-discriminatory use of AI in the education sector; recalls the risks and discrimination arising from recently developed AI tools used for school admission;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-powered education brings a wide range of possibilities and
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Stresses that artificial intelligence can reproduce and accentuate discriminatory processes ; requests that special attention be paid to this problem when designing and maintaining artificial intelligence; therefore recommends to ensure that the teams that design, develop, test and maintain, deploy and procure these systems, reflect the diversity of uses and society in general, and that they are diverse in terms of gender, culture and age to reflect all the essentials elements of society and avoid prejudice;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that digital technologies and their use can help to bridge the gap between pupils from privileged and disadvantaged social and economic backgrounds by providing access to adequate learning opportunities;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that AI initiatives can be complementary to traditional teaching methods and emphasises the importance of training teachers and educators, especially those responsible for under-age students, in the correct use of AI in education;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Underlines the need of a proper assessment of the AI tools used in the educational sector, in order to identify the impact that these tools can have on the rights of the children;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Notes that the technological industry includes a considerable number of start-ups working with AI and developing AI technologies; underlines that Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) will require additional support to ensure that their operations comply with data protection law and European data protection standards due to the disproportionate burden of regulation they bear because of their size;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Notes that, while AI has created new career opportunities, significant skills shortages still exist; welcomes, therefore, the moves by the Commission to involve everyone in the development of AI, including as many women as possible and those with disabilities, and to arouse interest among young people and encourage them to study AI-related subjects in addition to those relating to their career aspirations;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to make
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the use of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors should respect fundamental rights, freedoms and values as enshrined in the EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; welcomes the Commission’s White Paper on Artificial Intelligence in this regard, and invites the Commission to consider whether to include the educational sector in the future regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to make better use of data and AI-based technologies so as to make educational systems fit for the digital age; stresses that general public awareness of AI at all levels, including awareness of AI risks relating to privacy and bias, is essential for preparing everyone to make informed decisions; points out in this respect, the importance of making AI more explainable, comprehensible and transparent in order to ensure the effectiveness, usefulness and fairness of the AI-based technologies;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to make better use of data and AI-based technologies so as to make educational systems fit for the digital age; stresses that general public awareness of AI at all levels, including awareness of AI risks relating to privacy and bias, is essential for preparing everyone to make informed decisions; recalls that educating the public to ensure proper skills should be viewed as a prerequisite before the widespread use of AI, especially for children and vulnerable peoples;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the Commission’s plan to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to make better use of data and AI-based technologies and Calls on the Commission, Member States and other stakeholders, both public and private, to closely cooperate on necessary reforms in the educational sector so as to make educational systems fit for the digital age; stresses that general public awareness of AI at all levels, including awareness of AI risks relating to privacy and bias, is
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Welcomes the Commission’s focus on advanced skills while reiterating the importance of the basic skills; welcomes the upcoming update of the Skills Agenda in terms of everyone benefiting from the EU digital transformation; calls on the Commission to clarify the definition of AI skills in relation to digital skills; underlines the importance to diversify the technology sector and encourage students, in particular girls, to enrol in STEM courses;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses that next generation digital infrastructure and internet coverage are of strategic significance for providing AI-powered education to European citizens; in light of the COVID19crisis, calls on the Commission to elaborate a strategy for a European 5G that ensures Europe’s strategic resilience and is not dependent on technology from states who do not share our values;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Emphasises the urgent need to ensure basic digital skills for all European citizens, allowing for equal social and economic opportunities, avoiding gender inequalities, accelerating the transition to a digital economy, and society and increasing Europe’s crisis resilience;
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that data protection and privacy can be particularly affected by AI; defends the principles established in the General Data Protection Regulation as guiding principles for AI deployment; calls for stronger protection and safeguards in the education sector where children’s data are concerned; recalls that children constitute a vulnerable public, which deserves particular attention and protection; strongly believes that AI technologies pose a risk regarding collection of individual data of students and teachers in particular, which could breach their human rights; recommends in this sense that audiovisual recording and monitoring devices should not be used in schools to collect data for AI- related purposes;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that data protection and privacy can be particularly affected by AI; defends the principles established in the General Data Protection Regulation as guiding principles for AI deployment; calls for stronger protection and safeguards in the education sector where children’s data are concerned; calls on the Commission to support the Member States in setting up awareness and information campaigns that can help parents to better understand how their children's data is being used and processed for different purposes;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Recalls that data protection and privacy can be particularly affected by AI;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Recognises the threat that automation and AI might pose to employment and reiterates the need to maintain jobs as a priority, particularly in education, cultural and creative sectors;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the use of AI in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the European Commission to take into account the role data plays in concentrating market power in competition assessments, including antitrust and merger decisions.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need for explicability of AI algorithms and the possibility of human verification and for due process, including the right of appeal, especially for decisions taken within the framework of prerogatives of public power; urges the Commission to ensure that systems and methods are in place to allow verification of the algorithm and access to remedies;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need for explicability of AI algorithms and the possibility of human verification and for due process, including the right of appeal, especially for decisions taken within the framework of prerogatives of public power; notes that the terms and conditions should always include the community guidelines as well as the procedure of appeal;
Amendment 43 #
6. Underlines the need for explicability of AI
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need for full transparency and explicability of AI algorithms and the possibility of human verification and for due process, including the right of appeal, especially for decisions taken within the framework of prerogatives of public power;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the need for transparency and expl
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Underlines the clear risks of daily exposure to digital data largely generated by impenetrable algorithms, leaving both adults and young people vulnerable to harmful online content; notes that critical thinking and the ability to interact with skill and confidence in the online environment are needed more than ever;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to assess the risks of AI assisting the spread of disinformation in the digital environment and to propose recommendations, among others, for action against any AI-powered threats to free and fair elections and democracy; underlines that AI is also involved in the spread of disinformation about the Covid-19 pandemic; calls on the Commission to develop a regulatory framework that does not lead to censorship of individual content uploaded by users of social networks, but addresses the ways in which the content moderation algorithms are optimised towards engagement of their users; is seriously concerned that such optimisation favours content that is more outrageous and triggers more emotions, therefore giving a disadvantage to truthful and sober content;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the Commission to assess the risks of AI assisting the spread of disinformation and deep fakes in the digital environment
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 – indent 1 (new) - Such independent audits should be conducted annually, in analogy with the financial sector, to examine whether the used AI-applications and checks and balances are in accordance with specified criteria and are supervised by an independent sufficient overseeing authority;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Stresses that an assessment is also needed in order to identify how the AI can be used to counter disinformation, taking into account that the technology used to create a fake news is also the one which can be used to detect it;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools should always respect fundamental rights, especially freedom of expression, and should not lead to a general monitoring of the internet; stresses that algorithms should be used only as a flagging mechanism in content moderation, subject to human intervention, as AI is unable to reliably distinguish between legal, illegal and harmful content;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that AI tools
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools should always respect fundamental rights, especially freedom of expression, and should not lead to a general monitoring of the internet; nor to the removal of material disseminated for education, journalistic, artistic or research purposes;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online in order to let the principle what is illegal offline is illegal online prevail, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools should always respect fundamental rights, especially freedom of expression, and should not lead to a general monitoring of the internet;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools should always respect fundamental rights, especially freedom of expression and information, and should not lead to a general monitoring of the internet;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Notes that AI tools have the potential to fight illegal content online, but strongly recalls, ahead of the Digital Services Act expected for the end of this year, that such tools
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Notes that AI is used to analyse or predict aspects concerning individual's personal preferences, interests or behaviour, for profiling; Emphasises that the quality of output of automated decision making AI is subject to the quality of used data and the chosen predetermined parameters; Stresses that the use of automated decision making AI requires a strong legislative framework which protects privacy and personal data, and together with a duty of care obligation overseeing the legitimate use of the AI, that does not apply to content moderation, ensures full compliance; Calls therefore on the Commission to work out a duty of care regime through detailed sectoral guidelines in order to use automated decision making algorithms in compliance with the fundamental rights of protection of personal data and privacy, laid down in the General Data Protection Regulation1a; _________________ 1aRecital 71 and article 22 General Data Protection Regulation
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Encourages the audiovisual service providers's access to audience data on the use of their content and services when offered on third-party platforms, without prejudice to regulation on data protection and privacy, in order to adequately assess the performance of their service and to better serve audiences.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. notes that the immersive experiences facilitated by AI technologies can unfortunately also be exploited by malicious actors; calls on the Commission to anticipate this in proposing recommendations to adequately safeguard against the use of these technologies for illegal purposes;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Acknowledges the transformative potential of AI in developing increasingly effective education tools; calls on the Commission to propose an ambitious and more integrated European education agenda that takes into account AI- powered learning; highlights that, with adequate protection of fundamental rights and against biases, AI-powered learning can help bring education to disadvantaged communities, persons with disabilities, and other categories of European citizens lacking proper access to education, leading to a more inclusive society;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8 b. Calls on the Commission and Member States to support the use of AI in the area of digitalised cultural heritage
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes the benefits and risks of AI in terms of cybersecurity and emphasises the need for any AI solutions to be resilient to cyberattacks while respecting EU fundamental rights, especially the protection of personal data and privacy; calls on the Commission to evaluate the need for better prevention in terms of cybersecurity and mitigation measures thereof.
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Stresses the importance of promoting a better grasp of the fundamentals of digitalisation and AI by imparting the necessary skills at every level of education, focusing in particular on AI and robotics, on the availability of more high-quality ICT programmes for further education and on software reliability and security;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9 a. Calls on the Commission and Member States to allocate scientific and financial resources to motivate and attract talented people in AI sector to both come and stay working in the EU;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9 b. Observes that AI is used to manipulate face- and audiovisual characteristics, often referred to as deepfakes; Notes that this technique can be used to manipulate elections, to disseminate disinformation and for other undersirable actions; Asks the Commission therefore to impose an obligation for all deepfake material or any other realistically made synthetic videos, to state it's not original and a strict limitation when used for electoral purposes;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Notes that AI will have a major impact in cyberspace and play a very useful part in combating cybercrime; stresses the importance of monitoring the safe use of AI and the need for close collaboration between the public and private sectors to counter user vulnerabilities and the dangers arising in this connection;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 c (new) 9 c. Emphasises the importance of the protection of personal data and privacy; Observes the rapid development of AI applications to recognise unique characteristic elements, such as facial, movements and attitudes; Warns for interferences of privacy, non- discrimination and the protection of personal data with the use of automated recognition applications; Calls on the Commission to consider an absolute ban on facial recognition in the public space and educational premises and a ban on not local storage of data used for facial recognition;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 d (new) 9 d. Reckons the possibilities of AI in the culture sector to develop music, art and other cultural expressions; Emphasises that the freedom of expression is an important freedom and value and a pluriform cultural landscape is of great value to the society; Calls on the Commission to keep these values in mind while drafting its proposals on AI;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 e (new) 9 e. Recalls the importance of linguistic and cultural diversity in the EU and they key role played by the cultural, audio-visual and educational sectors in promoting European diversity; Calls therefore on the Commission to not let AI algorithms reduce this diversity, but to keep offer access to a wide variety of content which would not over-represent a single language and/or cultural model and to condemn any attempts from algorithms which would restrict this diversity and only offer content corresponding to some already existing patterns or which could act as an 'echo- chamber' that would prevent access to more diversity;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Emphasises that the rapid development of AI requires a strong futureproof legislative framework to protect personal data and privacy; Stresses therefore in this regard that all AI applications need to fully respect Union data protection law, namely Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (GDPR)1a and Directive (EC) 2002/58 of the European Parliament and of the Council (ePrivacy)1b currently under revision, freedom of expression and non- discrimination; _________________ 1aRegulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). 1bDirective 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37).
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Underlines that the benefits of AI should be shared with all parts of the society, leaving no one behind. Stresses, in this regard, the need to fully take into consideration the specific needs of the most vulnerable categories, such as children, persons with disabilities, elderly people and other groups at risks of exclusion, when designing and developing AI tools;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Notes that AI is often used for automated decision making algorithms to disseminate and order the content shown to the users, including to organise their personal feed; Stresses that these algorithms, how they work and how they order the shown material, are a black box to users, which takes away choice and control from the user, enables the creation of echo chambers and leads to a distrust in digital services; Calls on the Commission to compel AI applications to offer content by default in a neutral order, and to increase user control to influence the content they see by default;
source: 652.492
2020/06/05
FEMM
80 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality is a core principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties, and should be reflected in all EU policies, not least in education, culture and the audiovisual; and the development of disruptive technologies such as Artificial Intelligence;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas artificial intelligence systems are increasingly being developed to be more human-like, which is also affected by our image of gender equality; whereas AI designers modify AI systems based on their own human perception and world of experience; whereas developers of artificial intelligence systems and applications often have a similar background, are mostly male, usually well-paid and have often completed the same technical training; whereas the proportion of women and minorities in the development of artificial intelligence systems is very low; whereas gender inequalities and discrimination have been reproduced through the design, input and use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems; whereas incomplete datasets and incorrect bias can distort the reasoning of an AI system, and jeopardise gender equality in society;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas the media and the cultural sectors have considerable influence in shaping people’s beliefs, values and perception of reality and thus have the ability to perpetuate and amplify gender inequalities and discrimination
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas gender inequalities and discrimination
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas gender inequalities and discrimination have been reproduced through the design, input, development and use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems; whereas incomplete datasets and incorrect bias can distort the reasoning of an AI system, and jeopardise the achievement of gender equality in society;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Recital C Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender inequalities are also created and replicated through the language and images disseminated by the media and AI-powered applications; whereas education, culture programmes and audiovisual contents are a fundamental tool for combatting gender stereotypes and therefore clear monitoring and an ethical and regulatory framework must be in place ahead of implementing automatized solutions for these key sectors of society;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender inequalities are also created and replicated through the language and images disseminated by the media and AI-powered applications; whereas gender stereotypes are repeated, especially in the gaming industry and in the use of digital sound assistants; whereas education, culture programmes and audiovisual contents are a fundamental tool for combatting gender stereotypes;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender inequalities are also created and replicated through the language and images disseminated by the media and AI-powered applications; whereas education, culture programmes and audiovisual contents are a fundamental tool for combatting gender stereotypes and establishing strong role models;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender inequalities are also created and replicated through the language and images disseminated by the media and AI-powered applications; whereas education, culture programmes and audiovisual contents are a fundamental tool for combatting gender stereotypes and the digital gender divide;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Recital C C. whereas gender inequalities
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality is a core principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties, and should be reflected in all EU policies, not least in education, culture and the audiovisual, these being key channels for changing attitudes and challenging stereotypes;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas science and innovation can bring life-changing benefits, especially for those who are furthest behind – such as women and girls living in remote areas; whereas scientific education is important for obtaining skills, decent work, and jobs of the future, as well as to break gender stereotypes that regard them as stereotypically masculine fields; whereas science and scientific thinking are key to democratic culture, which in turn is fundamental for advancing gender equality;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Recital C a (new) Ca. whereas AI should not be used to influence in any way opinions, perceptions or the exercise of free will by individuals;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas women are significantly underrepresented in the AI sectors, either as creators, developers or consumers; whereas the full potential of women’s skills, knowledge and qualifications in the digital, AI and ICT (information, communication and technology) fields can contribute to boosting the European economy; whereas globally only 22 % of AI professionals are female; whereas the lack of women in AI development not only increases the risk of bias, but also deprives the EU of talent, vision and resources, and is therefore an obstacle to innovation; whereas gender diversity enhances female attitudes in teams, and team performance and favours the potential for innovation in public and private companies;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas women are significantly underrepresented in the AI sectors, either as creators or consumers; whereas the full potential of women’s skills, knowledge and qualifications in the digital, AI and ICT (information, communication and technology) fields can contribute to boosting the European economy and raise awareness of women's needs in connection with these tools; whereas globally only 22 % of AI professionals are female; whereas the lack of women in AI development not only increases the risk of bias, but also deprives the EU of talent, vision and resources, and is therefore an obstacle to innovation;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Recital D D.
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Recital D D. whereas women are significantly underrepresented in the AI sectors, either as creators or consumers; whereas the full potential of women’s skills, knowledge and qualifications in the digital, AI and ICT (information, communication and technology) fields, along with their re- skilling, can contribute to boosting the European economy; whereas globally only 22 % of AI professionals are female; whereas the lack of women in AI development not only increases the risk of bias, but also deprives the EU of talent, vision and resources, and is therefore an obstacle to innovation;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) Da. whereas digital voice assistants are mainly programmed as young women; whereas companies make a profit by pleasing their customers and justify the use of the female voice by the fact that customers prefer the female voice and they get more profit by using a female voice; whereas research findings do not support this view; whereas digital voice assistants have been shown to respond to messages comparable to sexual harassment often to a lesser extent; whereas the responses of voice assistants to sexual harassment are based on their programming; whereas the programmed responses of voice assistants to sexual harassment perpetuate a sexist and distorted image of women;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) Da. whereas the EU is facing an unparalleled shortage of women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) careers and education given that women account for 52% of the European population, yet only account for 1 in 3 of the STEM graduates; whereas despite the positive trend in the involvement and interest of females in STEM education, the percentages remain insufficient, especially considering the importance of STEM related careers in an increasing digitalized world;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Recital D a (new) Da. whereas past experiences in many technical fields, such as medicine, car safety design and others, have shown us that developments and innovations are often based mainly or solely on male data and that has had negative effects, including death, for women[1].[1] D’Ignazio/Klein, Data Feminism, MIT Publications, March 2020
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) Db. whereas cyber harassment remains a huge concern in the development of artificial intelligence in education, whereas significant amounts of people have been victims of new forms of online sexual and psychological harassment during the COVID19 period including zoom-bombing, stalking or threats online; whereas major part of the workplaces, including the EU institutions, did not implement any measures to address these new forms of sexual and psychological harassment;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality and respect for difference is a core principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties, and should be reflected in all EU policies, not least in education, culture and the audiovisual;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Recital D b (new) Db. whereas in the European Union 1 in every 10 women (10%) has already suffered some form of cyberviolence since the age of 15; whereas cyberviolence is often directed at women daring to speak out, like activists, women politicians and other public figures; whereas AI, and other emerging technologies, can play an important role in preventing cyberviolence against women and girls and educating people;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that AI has great potential to promote gender equality provided that the already existing conscious and unconscious bias are eliminated;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that AI has
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that AI has great potential to promote gender equality provided that conscious and unconscious bias are eliminated; stresses the need for AI to respect the principles and values of equality and non-discrimination between women and men; stresses, further, the importance of a risk-based approach, transparency, accountability and of continuous monitoring of existing and new algorithms;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that AI has great potential to promote gender equality
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that AI has great potential to promote gender equality provided that conscious and unconscious bias are eliminated; stresses the need for AI to respect the principles and values of equality and non-discrimination between women and men; stresses, further, the importance of a risk-based approach and of continuous monitoring of existing and new algorithms and of monitoring of the results of their work;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Considers that AI has great potential to promote gender equality provided that conscious and unconscious bias are eliminated; stresses the need for AI to respect the principles and values of equality and non-discrimination between women and men; stresses, further, the importance of a risk-based approach and of continuous monitoring of
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Takes the view that AI must serve users and should not on any account be used to alter individuals' perceptions, ways of thinking or exercise of free will in any way;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and the adoption of a multi-level
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality is a core principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties, and should be reflected in all EU policies,
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and the adoption of a multi-level approach to address the gender gap in all levels of education and employment in the digital sector; recognises that gender stereotyping, cultural discouragement and the lack of awareness and promotion of female role models hinders and negatively affects girls' and women´s opportunities in ICT, STEM and AI related studies, careers and entrepreneurship, and leads to discrimination and fewer opportunities for women in the labour market;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and the adoption of a multi-level approach to address the gender gap in all levels of education and employment in the digital sector; and to promote a culture of workplaces in technology workplaces towards gender equality working conditions and working practices, which will also lead to the development of more gender-diverse and inclusive technology products and applications using artificial intelligence;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and the adoption of a multi-level approach to address the gender gap in all levels of education and employment in the digital sector; stresses the importance of increasing the number of women trained and employed in AI, which will contribute to women's participation in shaping reality, as well as to reducing the risks associated with the creation of so-called 'biased algorithms';
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, at combatting sexism in particularly male dominated work environments such as of AI and programming and the adoption of a multi-level approach to address the gender gap in all levels of education and employment in the digital sector;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and the adoption of a multi-level approach to address the gender gap in all levels of education and employment in the digital sector, while respecting the different choices that men and women make;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and the adoption of a multi-level approach to address the gender gap in all levels of education, with particular emphasis on primary education, and employment in the digital sector;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Calls for policies targeted at increasing the participation of women in the fields related to science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM), AI and
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the European Commission in respect of the obligation of gender mainstreaming and ahead any further legislation or policy to develop a comprehensive gender analysis on the potential impacts of AI in all sectors, including media, culture and education, in order to assess the risks and outline recommendations to correct potential negative gender equality outcomes for individuals and the society as a whole;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises the cross-sectoral nature of gender based discrimination, rooted in conscious or unconscious gender bias, covering the education sector, the portrayal of women in the media and advertising on-screen and off- screen, and the responsibility of the public and private sector in proactively recruiting, developing and retaining women talent and instilling an inclusive business culture;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take into account AI from a gender perspective when developing policy and legislation, and, if necessary, adapt current legislation, including EU programmes; encourages Member States to enact a strategy to promote the presence of females in STEM, ICT and AI related studies and careers in relevant existing national strategies to achieve gender equality. These strategies should aim at increasing gender equality by focusing on education and qualifications, better work-life balance, equal opportunities, non- discrimination in the labour market, raising awareness of gender bias across all relevant sectors, and increasing the visibility of female role models, among others; urges the Commission to address the gender gap in STEM, ICT and AI related careers and education, and set it as a priority of the Digital Skills Package in order to promote the presence of women in all education levels, as well as in the upskilling and reskilling of the labour force;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. whereas gender equality is a core principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties, and should be reflected in
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take into account AI from a gender perspective when developing policy and legislation
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Commission and Member States to take into account
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls on the Commission and Members States to provide appropriate funding to programmes aimed at attracting more girls and women to study and work in STEM; urges the Commission and Member States to set up programmes that finance women and girls who start AI-related projects or companies in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors; asks the Commission and Member States to grant a privileged access to funds to companies in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors that are gender balanced; encourages the Commission and Member States in public procurement procedures regarding the education, culture and audiovisual sectors to review the selection criteria used to check if they are male biased; stresses that the Commission and Member States should provide appropriate funding for the development of AI solutions that prevent and fight cyberviolence against women and girls and help educate young people;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recognises that producers of AI solutions must make a greater effort to test products thoroughly in order to anticipate potential errors impacting vulnerable groups; calls for work to be stepped up on a tool to teach algorithms to recognise disturbing human behaviour, which would identify those elements that most frequently contribute to discriminatory mechanisms in the automated decision-making processes of algorithms;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Underlines the importance of ensuring that the interests of women experiencing multiple forms of discrimination, marginalised and vulnerable groups are adequately taken into account and represented in any future regulatory framework; Notes with concern that marginalised groups risk of suffering new technological, economic and social divides with the development of AI;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for specific measures to tackle cyber violence; calls for binding legislative measures to combat these forms of violence and to support Member States in the development of training tools for the police force, the justice system and the information and communication technology sector;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Considers that AI product testing system documentation should be open access and respect intellectual property rights, so that non-governmental organisations and academics can carry out independent audits; points out that users must always be informed when an algorithm has been used to make a decision concerning them, particularly where the decision relates to access to benefits or to a product;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and Member States to devise policy measures that fully incorporate the gender dimension, such as awareness-raising campaigns, training and curricula, which should provide information to citizens on how algorithms operate, and their impact on citizens’ daily lives; highlights that genderless images of AI and robots should be used for educational and cultural purposes, unless gender is a key factor for some reason; urges the Commission and Member States to include digital skills and AI training in the school curricula and make them mandatory for all, as a way to close the digital gender divide;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and Member States to devise policy measures that fully incorporate the gender dimension, such as awareness-raising campaigns, training and curricula, which should provide information to citizens on how algorithms operate, and their impact on citizens’ daily lives
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas Artificial Intelligence (AI) and digitalisation is fundamentally transforming our reality and the basis on which it is being shaped and regulated today will highly influence our future societies; whereas the lack of diversity in designing and financing AI is concentrating an increasingly large amount of power and capital in the hands of a select subset of people, which tend to be white, wealthy, highly-educated male and to underrepresent women and discriminated groups; whereas the development of AI under these circumstances have a high risk of perpetuating or even increasing gender and other inequalities; whereas there is a need to advocate for a human centred approach anchored in human rights and ethics for the development and use of AI;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and Member States to
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Calls on the Commission and Member States to devise
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers essential for the achievement of gender equality to build a comprehensive sexuality and relationship education, which includes the fight against cyber violence, online sexual harassment as well as against online objectification, hypersexualisation and sexual exploitation of women;
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights the importance of the development and deployment of AI applications in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sectors in collecting more accurate and
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights the importance of the development and deployment of AI applications in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sectors in collecting more accurate and sex-disaggregated data, and applying modern machine learning de- biasing techniques, if needed, to correct stereotype gender bias, which may have negative impacts; highlights that one the most critical weaknesses of AI relates to the different types of biases it is subject to, such as gender, race or sexual orientation, as a result of already inherent human biases;
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights the importance of the development and deployment of AI applications in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sectors in collecting more accurate and sex-disaggregated and other equality data, and applying modern machine learning de-
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Highlights the importance of the development and deployment of AI applications in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sectors in collecting more accurate and sex-disaggregated data, and applying modern machine learning de- biasing techniques, if needed
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses, given the highly sensitive nature of the data concerning pupils, students and other learners, the need for appropriate conformity assessments to verify and ensure that all the provisions concerning high-risk applications are complied with, including test, inspection and certification requirements; emphasises that data sets used to train AI systems should be reviewed to ensure that they are reliable and accurate, to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases based on gender, ethnic and racial origin, religion or beliefs, disability, age or sexual orientation;
Amendment 68 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that for the purpose of analysing the impacts of algorithmic systems on citizens, access to data should be extended to appropriate parties notably independent researchers, media and civil society organisations, while fully respecting Union data protection and privacy law;
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to include education in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners; emphasises that in the education sector, this deployment should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Aa. whereas gender equality is a core principle of the European Union enshrined in the Treaties, and should be reflected in all EU policies, not least in education, culture and the audiovisual, as well as in the development of disruptive technologies such as Artificial Intelligence; whereas significant gender bias remains in existing social norms in sectors such as education, audiovisuals and culture;
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Expresses concern at the use, in some local areas, of AI applications for remote biometric identification purposes; points out that the use of intrusive surveillance technologies, particularly in high-risk sectors such as education, may infringe fundamental rights, as it involves the use of sensitive data;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Calls on the Commission to encourage the use of EU programmes such as Horizon Europe, Digital Europe and Erasmus+ to promote multi- disciplinary research, pilot projects, experiments, development of tools including training, for the identification of gender biases in AI, and awareness raising campaigns for the general public;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for diverse teams of developers and engineers working alongside the main actors in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sector in order to prevent gender and cultural bias being inadvertently included in AI algorithms, systems and applications. urges the Commission to preserve and promote the plurality of reference theories on which the development of AI systems is based;
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses th
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for diverse teams of developers and engineers working alongside the main actors in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sector in order to prevent gender
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Stresses the need for diverse teams of developers and engineers working alongside the main actors in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sector in order to prevent
Amendment 76 #
6a. Stresses the need for training for AI workers and educators to promote the ability to identify and correct gender- discriminatory practices in the workplace and in education, and for workers developing AI systems and applications to identify and remedy sexism and gender in AI systems and applications they develop; and to establish clear responsibilities in companies and educational institutions to ensure that there is no discrimination or sexism based on gender in the workplace and educational institutions;
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that algorithms and AI should be "ethical by design", with no built-in bias. Media organizations should be informed about the main parameters of algorithm-based AI systems that determine ranking and search results onto third-party platforms. Likewise, users should be informed about any use of AI for decision-making in services they use and should be empowered to set their privacy setting preferences via transparent and understandable measures, directly at the service provider level;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Points out that taking due care to eliminate bias and discrimination against particular groups, including gender stereotypes, should not halt technological progress;
Amendment 79 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to support research funding aimed at identifying and eradicating the causes of responses of digital voice assistants that underestimate the sexual harassment towards them; to end the practice of making digital voice assistants women by default and to encourage the development of gender-neutral voice assistants;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Recital B Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Recital B B. whereas gender inequalities
source: 652.604
2020/06/25
JURI
62 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies are a tool to serve the people and that algorithmic systems can enable access to information, including listings of different kinds of cultural objects; notes the risks of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement when blending AI and different technologies with a multiplicity of sources (documents, photos, films) and calls for the use of AI to ensure a high level of IPR protection within the current legislative framework, for example by alerting individuals and businesses if they are in danger of inadvertently infringing the rules or assisting IPR rightholders if the rules are actually infringed;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Reiterates the importance of access to culture for every citizen throughout the Union; highlights in this context the importance of the exchange of best practices among member states, educational facilities and cultural institutions and similar stakeholders; further considers it of vital importance that resources available both at EU- as well as national level are used to the maximum of their potential to further improving access to culture; stresses that there are a multitude of options to access culture and all varieties should be explored in order to consider the most appropriate option; highlights the importance of consistency with the Marrakech declaration;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls on the European Commission to realise the full potential of artificial intelligence (AI) for the purposes of improving communication with citizens, through cultural and audiovisual online platforms for example, keeping them informed of what is happening at decision-making level, narrowing the gap between the EU and the grass roots and promoting social cohesion between EU citizens;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that AI technologies pose a danger as regards the collection of the personal data of pupils and teachers in particular, which could constitute a violation of their fundamental rights; recommends, therefore, that audiovisual recording and monitoring devices not be used in schools to collect data for AI- related purposes;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Highlights that education, culture and the audio-visual sector are areas sensitive to the use of AI and related technologies since they have the potential to impact our societies and the fundamental rights they uphold; contends therefore that legally binding ethical principles should be observed in their deployment, development and use;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. notes how artificial intelligence and related technologies may be used in developing or applying new methods of education, i.e. language learning, academia overall, specialised learning, etc.;highlights the importance not only of using such technologies for educational purposes but also digital literacy and public awareness of the former;stresses the importance of providing educators, trainers, etc. with the right tools and know-how with regards to AI- and related technologies in terms of what they are, how they are used and how to use them as tools properly and according to the law, so as to avoid IPR-infringements; highlights in particular the importance of digital literacy for staff working in education, as well as improving digital training for the elderly, considering that newer generations already have a basic notion of these technologies, having grown up with them;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Calls on the European Commission, the Member States and the business community to actively and fully exploit the potential of AI in providing the facts and combating fake news, disinformation, xenophobia and racism on cultural and audiovisual online platforms, while at the same time avoiding censorship;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. Emphasises that European artificial intelligence should safeguard and promote core values of our Union such as democracy, independent and free media and information, quality education, environmental sustainability, gender balance and cultural and linguistic diversity;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Notes that the independence of the creative process raises issues related to ownership of intellectual property rights; considers, in this connection, that it would not be appropriate to seek to impart legal personality to AI technologies;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Notes that AI can play an important role in promoting and protecting our European and national cultural diversity, especially when used by audiovisual online platforms in promoting content to customers;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies are a tool to serve the people in many walks of life, including the audiovisual, cultural and educational sectors and that algorithmic systems can enable access to information, including listings of different kinds of cultural objects; notes the risks of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement when blending AI and different technologies with a multiplicity of sources (documents, photos, films); emphasises in this connection the need for continued reflection on the interactions between the use of AI in these sectors and intellectual property rights;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that AI could
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Notes that AI could redefine research by studying patterns in
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Notes the important role, which independent media plays in culture and daily life of citizens; stresses that fake media is a fundamental problem, as copyright and IPR's generally are consistently infringed upon; calls for the Commission to, in cooperation with Member States, continue its work on raising awareness for this problem, countering the effects of fake media as well as the source problems; furthermore, considers it of importance to develop educational strategies to improve digital literacy, specifically in this regard;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-improved image recognition software could vastly enhance the ability of educational facilities and relevant actors to provide and develop modern and innovative schooling methods while ensuring quality sources and respecting the protection of IPRs, as well as ensure the safety of children and minors both within educational facilities and when connected remotely within an educational context; highlights the importance of privacy and data protection legislation; stresses in this regards the dependence of the Union on external data and software providers; considers it vital, that these technologies are only integrated into the existing systems if the protection of fundamental rights and privacy are an absolute given;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-improved image recognition software could vastly enhance
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-improved
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies, which always involve a certain level of human intervention, are a tool to serve the people and
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI-improved image recognition software could vastly enhance the ability of educational facilities and relevant actors to provide and develop modern and innovative schooling methods while ensuring quality sources and respecting the protection of IPRs, provided that this does not serve as a pretext for doing away with schooling methods based on human intervention by a teacher who is physically present;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Notes that AI
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 – point a (new) (a) Notes that due to the significance that the AI could have in the education scenery, it is necessary a rigorous legal basis covering all digital tools to facilitate and enhance teaching activities thought aspects such as reporting educational contents or the improvement of teacher- student ratio.
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Recalls that in the Continental European understanding of authorship, the concept of 'intellectual creation' is tied to the author's personality, meant to apply to natural persons, and therefore artificial agents such as robots and artificial intelligence shall not be considered as authors, and information produced by them shall not be eligible to copyright protection; considers that the authors’ fragile position and often low remuneration should not be further accentuated by new categories of copyrightable works generated by Artificial Intelligence technologies which would compete with human artistic creation; rejects the concept of data ownership and stresses the need for enhancing access to and use of non- personal data;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Notes that, if the use of AI is to benefit the education and research sector, the EU must encourage training in the skills of the future, in particular an ethical and responsible approach to AI technologies; adds, with that aim in view, that this training must not be reserved for pupils focusing on scientific and technical subjects, who are already more familiar with these tools, but must instead target as many people as possible, in particular in the younger generations;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses that the need for investment in research and innovation regarding the use and development of AI and its cultural, educational and audiovisual applications is a key consideration in this respect; calls on the European Commission to find additional funding to promote research and innovation regarding artificial intelligence applications in these sectors.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Expresses serious concern that schools and other education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by companies with a dominant market position most of which are based outside the EU;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Underlines the need to ensure EU- wide digital and AI literacy, namely through the development of training opportunities for teachers; insist that the use of AI technologies in schools should contribute to narrow down the social and regional digital gap.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Highlights that the COVID-19 pandemic crisis can be considered as a probation period for the development and use of digital and AI related technologies in the educational and cultural sectors, as exemplified by the many online schooling platforms and online tools for cultural promotion employed across the Member States; thus calls on the Commission to take stock of those examples when considering a common EU approach to the increased use of such technological solutions;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Points out that data protection and privacy can be particularly seriously affected by AI; advocates compliance with the principles laid down in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR);
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines th
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 c (new) 3c. Calls on the Commission to take more effective steps to protect the personal data of pupils and teachers in the education sphere;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises th
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the interaction between AI and the creative industries is complex and requires an in-depth assessment; welcomes the ongoing study ‘Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence - Challenges to the IPR Framework’ and the ‘Study on Copyright and New technologies: copyright data management and Artificial Intelligence’; underlines the importance of clarifying the use of copyright-protected content as data input (images, music, films, databases etc.) and in the production of cultural and audio-visual outputs, by or with the assistance of AI technologies; invites the Commission to study its impact on the European creative industries; reiterates the importance of European data and welcomes the statements made by the Commission in this regard and the placement of artificial intelligence and related technologies high on the agenda;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the interaction
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Emphasises that the interaction between AI and the creative industries is complex and requires an in-depth assessment; welcomes the ongoing study ‘Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence - Challenges to the IPR Framework’ and the ‘Study on Copyright and New technologies: copyright data management and Artificial Intelligence’; underlines the importance of clarifying the conditions of use of copyright-protected content as data input (images, music, films, databases etc.)
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses that in the data economy context, better copyright data management is achievable, for the purpose of better remunerating authors and performers, notably in enabling the swift identification of the authorship and right ownership of content, thus contributing to lowering the number of orphan works; further highlights that AI technological solutions should be used to improve copyright data infrastructure and the interconnection of metadata in works, but also to facilitate the transparency obligation provided in Article 19 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market for up to date, relevant and comprehensive information on the exploitation of authors’ and performers’ works and performances, particularly in the presence of a plurality of rightholders and of complex licensing schemes;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Emphasises that automated means of removing copyrighted works that are posted without authorisation on online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared should be standardised at EU level to ensure that they function properly for the benefit both of users and of copyright- holders;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Stresses the need to work on the most efficient way of reducing bias in AI systems, in line with ethical and non- discrimination standards; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be as broad as possible in order to represent society in the best relevant way, that the outputs should be reviewed to avoid all forms of stereotypes, discrimination and biases and when appropriate, make use of AI to identify and correct human biases when that might exist; calls on the Commission to encourage and facilitate the sharing of de-biasing strategies for data;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Asks the Commission to assess the impact of IPR to the research and development of AI and
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies are a tool to serve
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – point a (new) (a) Highlights the future role that the inclusion of AI-based technological tools should have in the conservation, disclosure and heritage control, just as in the associated research projects.
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 – point b (new) (b) Stresses the significance that the proposals for legal measures have for a global and unified access to AI in all different artistic and cultural sectors.
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the need to strike a balance between, on the one hand, the development of AI systems and their use in the educational, cultural and audiovisual sectors and, on the other, measures to safeguard competition and market competitiveness for AI companies in these sectors; emphasises in this regard the need to encourage companies to invest in the innovation of AI systems used in these sectors, while at the same time ensuring that those providing such applications do not obtain a market monopoly;
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Asks the Commission to assess the impact of AI and AI related technologies in creating new audio-visual works such as deep fakes and to establish the appropriate legal consequences attached to their creation, production or distribution for malicious purposes.
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that automation and the development of AI could pose a threat to employment, and emphasises once again that priority must be given to safeguarding jobs, in particular in the education, culture and creative sectors;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Calls on the Commission to launch an EU-level education plan on digital and AI literacy, in coordination with Member States, with a particular focus on school students and youth;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission to consider the legal aspects of AI- technologies produced outputs, as well as cultural content generated with the use of AI and related technologies; considers it important to support the production of cultural content; reiterates however the importance of safeguarding the unique IPR-framework of the Union and that any changes ought to be done with the necessary due care , in order to not disrupt the delicate balance; calls on the Commission to produce an in-depth assessment with regards to the possible legal personality of AI-produced content, as well as the application of IPR to AI- generated content, as well as content created with the use of AI-tools;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Calls on the Commission to establish requirements for the procurement and deployment of artificial intelligence and related technologies by EU public sector bodies, to ensure compliance with Union law and fundamental rights, and highlights the added value of instruments such as public consultations and impact assessments to be run prior to the procurement or deployment of artificial intelligence systems, as recommended in the Report of the Special Rapporteur to the UN General Assembly on AI and its impact on freedom of opinion and expression1a; _________________ 1aReport of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, https://undocs.org/A/73/348
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Calls on the Commission to lay down rules designed to guarantee effective data interoperability, in order to make content purchased on a platform accessible on any digital tool irrespective of make;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5 c. Emphasises that challenges brought by the use of artificial intelligence and related technologies can only be overcome by establishing data quality obligations, transparency and oversight requirements, in order to enable the public and authorities to assess the compliance with Union law and fundamental rights; anticipates the Commission’s proposals following its communication on a European strategy for data1a as regards the sharing and pooling of datasets. _________________ 1aCOM(2020) 66 final, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/co mmunication-european-strategy-data- 19feb2020_en.pdf
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. The ban on imposing a locked proprietary ecosystem for the use of digital products. In order to make for genuine data interoperability, digital products must be in open formats so as to allow users to export to different digital environments.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Highlights that consistent integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education sector has the potential to face some of the biggest challenges of education, to come up with innovative teaching and learning practices, and finally, to accelerate the progress towards achieving sustainable development goals in order to accomplish with the 2030 Agenda for Education.
source: 653.888
2020/10/09
CULT
252 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 — having regard to Articles 165, 166 and 167 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 b (new) - having regard to its in-depth analysis of May 2020 on The use of Artificial Intelligence in the Audiovisual Sector,
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Another of the main artificial intelligence goals for our education systems should be to make teachers' work easier and simplify it; artificial intelligence can free them from mechanical tasks such as correcting students' work and carrying out paperwork, and prevent them from having to teach a single homogeneous syllabus to different groups of students, with differing learning speeds and abilities;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses that education is a sector where wrong deployment of AI technologies can pose significant risk to fair chances, professional career, life- quality and fundamental rights of individuals involved in the education system; calls on the Commission to cover the education sector by the regulatory framework for the high-level risk AI application;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that, given the frequent and worrying instances of industrial espionage in Europe, derogations from the requirement to upload these algorithms transparently must be possible;
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. Stresses the necessity to curb monopolistic tendencies in sectors where big technology companies, while not producing media, educational or culture content, are likely to dominate at crucial points along value chains, in terms of interface and infrastructure, and access to and control of data; highlights in this respect the need to ensure that technological developments benefit also European small and medium companies which have less leeway to invest in innovation;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, when taking competition- policy decisions, including cartel and merger decisions, to take greater account of the role played by data and algorithms in the concentration of market power;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Points out that AI must not be developed and used in a manner detrimental to data protection and privacy;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Points out that some businesses could have real problems in making all their algorithms public, as these tools often take years, are costly to develop and are a company asset;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 c (new) 2 c. Notes that for AI-powered digital space become an opportunity for all, the Members States should deliver on their national objectives of bringing internet to all citizens and to close the yawning gaps of income inequality;
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills at Union level
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills at Union level as a prerequisite for the proper use of AI in education; calls on the Commission, in that regard, to make AI-related skills
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 c (new) - having regard to the Council of the European Union’s conclusions of June 2020 on Shaping Europe’s Digital future,
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills at Union level as a prerequisite for the use of AI in education; calls on the Commission, in that regard, to make AI-related skills one of the main priorities of its next Digital Education Action Plan; urges the Commission to launch an AI and robotics initiative in education; reiterates the need to update the Digital Education Action Plan in order to integrate AI development direction in education;
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills at Union level
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills at
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls the importance of strengthening digital skills at Union level as a prerequisite for the development and use of AI in education; calls on the Commission, in that regard, to define and make AI-related skills one of the main priorities of its next Digital Education Action Plan;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Another of the Commission's priority areas, as part of the Digital Action Plan, should be support for the equipping of educational establishments, by the Member States, with the technological tools needed to develop AI, along with pilot programmes for the introduction of AI applications (accompanied by exacting evaluation plans). calls, to this end, for particular attention to be paid in the implementation of the recovery package plans, and of the ERDF, to financing projects of this kind;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Highlights, that the use of AI in education systems brings a wide range of possibilities, opportunities and tools for making it more innovative, inclusive, efficient and increasingly effective by introducing new ways of quick and personalised student-centric high quality learning; stresses however that, as it will impact education and social inclusion, the availability of such tools to all social groups by establishing equal access to education and learning leaving no one behind, especially persons with disabilities must be ensured;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Acknowledges that high levels of private investments made in learning technology companies and AI solutions more generally throughout the past years have helped development of educational technologies; considers that public-private partnerships are essential for further development of AI based educational solutions;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls on the Commission and the Members States to promote digital literacy plans and forums of discussions to involve citizens, parents and students in a democratic dialogue with public authorities and stakeholders over the development, deployment and use of AI technologies in the education systems;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to the French Higher Council for Literary and Artistic Property's report on the legal and economic challenges of artificial intelligence in the cultural sectors;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Stresses the importance of respecting fundamental and human rights, freedoms and values, including privacy and the protection of everyone’s personal data while using technology and AI related tools in education, by providing legally binding ethical conditions, safety and transparency with precisely defined, uniformed and clarified Union-wide regulation aligned with GDPR-compliant rules for data sharing, especially for children and minors, who are most vulnerable and are strictly protected;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Notices that AI technologies in education should be anchored by human centric values allowing for human control, autonomy and safety, and shall respect fundamental rights. Teachers shall control and supervise any deployment and use of AI technologies in schools and universities, when interacting with pupils and students; reminds that AI systems cannot take any final decision that can affect educational opportunities, such as students’ final evaluation, without full human supervision;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. The real objective of AI in our education systems should be making education as individualised as possible, offering students personalised academic paths that are in line with their strengths and weaknesses and offering them didactic material tailored to their characteristics, maintaining educational quality and the integrating principle of our education systems;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not on AI itself, but on how teachers use AI to meet the needs of both students and teachers; points out, therefore, the need for AI programmers to involve teachers in designing AI-sustainable solutions that are suitable for real-life educational
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not on AI itself, but on how teachers use AI to meet the needs of both students and teachers; points out, therefore, the need for AI programmers to involve teachers in designing AI-sustainable solutions that are suitable for real-life educational environments; calls for schools and other educational establishments to be provided with the financial and logistical support and the expertise required to introduce the learning of the future;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not on AI itself, but on how teachers use AI to
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not only on AI itself, but on how teachers use AI to meet the needs of
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not on
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 a (new) - having regard to its study of April 2020 on Education and employment of women in science, technology and the digital economy, including AI and its influence on gender equality,
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not on AI itself, but on how teachers
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that the learning benefits of using AI in education will depend not on AI itself, but on how teachers use AI to meet the needs of both students and teachers; points out, therefore, the need for AI programmers to involve teachers in designing AI-sustainable solutions that are suitable for real-life educational environments and reflect the age and developmental readiness of each learner;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Encourages the national governments together with educational institutions to rethink, rework and adapt their educational curricula according to the needs of 21st century allowing the usage of AI in education to create educational programmes with a stronger emphasis on STEAM subjects which will result in preparing learners for the increasing importance of AI and facilitate the acquisition of cognitive skills;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the importance of an inclusive education, therefore the use of AI technologies cannot result in detriment of or in substitution of in-person education, especially in early childhood education, since this type of teaching ensures the acquisition of skills that will enable students to progress throughout their lives, such as personal relations, study skills, empathy and cooperative work;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to train and further train teachers so they can adapt to the realities of AI-powered education and acquire the necessary skills to use AI in a pedagogical and meaningful way; calls for digital teaching to be part of every teacher's training in the future and for teachers to be given the opportunity to continue their training in digital teaching throughout their lives;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to train teachers in digitisation so they can adapt to the realities of AI-powered education and acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to use AI technologies in a pedagogical and meaningful way;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to train teachers so they can adapt to the realities of AI-powered education and acquire the necessary skills to use AI in a pedagogical and meaningful way; underlines the importance of a pan- European integrated and inclusive approach offering training and skilling opportunities;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to train
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 b (new) - having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of September 2018 on Digital Gender Gap,
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to train teachers so they can
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Highlights, moreover, the need to train teachers so they can adapt to the realities of
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Is concerned about the lack of AI specific higher education programmes, coupled with lack of public funding for AI, across the Member States; believes that this is putting Europe‘s digital future ambitions at risk;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Is worried about the lack of AI researchers pursuing an academic career due to tech firms‘ ability to offer better pay and less bureaucracy for research; believes that part of the solution is directing more public money towards AI research at the universities;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5 b. Notes that ethically driven AI and related technologies could vastly enhance quality in education for all at all levels, ensuring an adequate protection of personal data, in particular children’s data, transparent and reliable data sources;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of equipping people with general digital skills from childhood onwards, in order to close the qualification gap and integrate certain population groups better into the digital labour market and digital society; points out that it will become more and more important to train
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals in the field of AI and of upskilling the future workforce to enable it to cope with the realities of an AI-driven labour market; thus encourages the Member States to upgrade their educational offers with AI- related skills and to put in place specific curricula for AI developers but also curricula integrating AI in traditional classes; recalls the special needs of VET education with regards to AI and calls upon a collaborative approach at European level designed to enhance the potential offered by AI in VET education across Europe;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals in the field of AI and of upskilling the future workforce to enable it to cope with the realities of an AI-driven labour market; recalls that women are underrepresented among AI researches and that this may create important gender imbalances in the future labour market; thus encourages the Member States to upgrade their educational offers with AI-
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being developed at a fast pace, helping to accelerate the pace of innovation, and are increasingly being used in education, culture and the audiovisual sector; whereas AI will help improve labour productivity and help accelerate economic growth;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals in the field of AI and of upskilling the
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of increasing the number of training highly skilled professionals in the field of AI and of upskilling the current and future workforce to enable it to cope with the realities of an AI-driven labour market; thus encourages the Member States to upgrade their educational offers with AI- related skills and to put in place specific curricula for AI developers;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Underlines the importance of training highly skilled professionals in the field of
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Highlights, that future labour environment will be heavily dependent on digital technologies and AI throughout all sectors, which will lead to transformation of the European labour market; stresses that it is necessary to ensure that no-one is left behind without being able to adapt to the changes, mainly through requalification, lifelong learning, adaptation of digital technologies to suit the needs of people with disabilities;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Underlines the specific risks existing in the use of AI automated recognition applications, which are currently developing rapidly; recalls that children are a particularly sensitive public; recommends that the Commission and the Member States ban automated biometric identification, such as facial recognition for educational and cultural purposes, on educational and cultural premises, unless its use is allowed in law;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses the need to increase the customer choice, to stimulate competition and broaden the range of offered services of AI technologies for education purposes; encourages public authorities to incentivise development and deployment by public funding and public procurement; considers that technologies used by public education providers or purchased with public funding should be based on open-source technology;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Recalls that an ethical driven AI should be socially responsible and ensure gender equality; stresses therefore, the need of increasing the ratio of women in STEAM studies in order to tackle the gender gap on ICT sectors, and calls on the Members States to address specific plans with concrete training for teachers to prevent bias and discrimination in the use of AI and related technologies;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Stresses that application of AI in education should have an overarching aim of enriching teaching and learning experience and not reducing or substituting personal interaction with machine-based education; warns against dangers of widening of the rich - poor gap if AI-assisted learning becomes for some not a choice but the only accessible mode of education;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Notes that innovation in education sector is overdue and got highlighted due to Covid-19 outbreak and the associated switch to online and distance learning; stresses that AI-driven educational tools such as those for assessment and detecting learning difficulties can improve the quality and effectiveness of online learning;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Calls upon the creation of a pan- European university’ and research’ network focused on AI in education integrating institutions and experts from all fields studying the impact of AI in learning and identifying solutions to enhance its potential;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas artificial intelligence (AI) technologies that can directly impact all aspects of our societies, including fundamental rights and social and economic principles and values are being developed at a fast pace, and are increasingly being used in education, culture and the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that AI must not replace teachers, but serve as a complement to education;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. Regrets the underrepresentation of women in jobs connected to AI, such as data analysis, IT, mathematics and computing technologies, because only fair representation of all parts of society in relevant field will be able to produce AI beneficial to all;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Points out that before they teach advanced skills (different programming languages, deep learning, AI, 3D), Member States should focus on basic skills: spelling, grammar, algebra and history;
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that AI can play a significant role in preserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage, notably by monitoring and analysing changes to cultural heritage sites caused by threats such as climate change, natural disasters and armed conflicts; Calls on the Commission to investigate possible use of AI for digitisation of cultural heritage that would be beneficial for their preservation and risk prediction;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that AI can play a significant role in preserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage, both the actual cultural heritage and digital or digitised cultural heritage notably by monitoring and analysing changes to cultural heritage sites caused by threats such as climate change, natural disasters and armed conflicts;
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that AI can play a significant role in preserving, promoting
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that AI technologies can play a significant role in preserving, renovating, studying, promoting and managing European cultural heritage assets, notably by monitoring and analysing changes to cultural heritage sites caused by threats such as climate change, natural disasters and armed conflicts;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that AI can play a significant role in preserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage, notably by monitoring and analysing changes to cultural heritage sites caused by threats such as climate change, natural disasters, cancel culture, terrorism and armed conflicts;
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses that AI can play a significant role in documenting, analysing, preserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage,
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that AI provides new opportunities for cultural institutions, such as museums, to produce innovative tools for cataloguing artefacts as well as documenting and accessing cultural heritage sites, notably through 3D modelling and augmented virtual reality; stresses that AI will also allow museums and art galleries to be able to implement interactive and personalised services for visitors by providing them a list of suggested items based on their expressed interest in person as well as online;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are being developed at a fast pace, and are increasingly being used in almost all areas of our lives, including education, culture and the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that AI provides new opportunities for cultural institutions, such as museums, to produce innovative tools for documenting and accessing cultural heritage sites, notably through 3D modelling and augmented virtual reality; calls upon the fair monetisation by cultural institutions of 3D modelling, augmented virtual reality and AI driven visuals;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that AI technologies bring a chance to increase the visibility of Europe's cultural diversity; points out that these technologies provide
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Stresses that AI provides new opportunities for cultural institutions, such as museums, to produce innovative tools for documenting and
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Stresses that using AI will provide new innovative approaches, tools and methodologies allowing cultural workers and researchers to create uniform databases with adequate classification schemes as well as multimedia metadata, allowing them to make connections between different cultural heritage objects, thus increasing the knowledge and providing better understanding of cultural heritage;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Highlights that the AI related technological advances are opening new possibilities for not only capturing, preserving and visualising cultural heritage, but also processing, analysing and reconstructing it and thus opening new possibilities to make use of it and extract new information and knowledge from it;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that good practices in AI for cultural heritage accessibility should be identified and shared amongst cultural networks across the Union, while also encourageing research on the uses of AI for the valorisation, accessibility and preservation of cultural heritage;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that good practices in AI for cultural heritage accessibility should be identified and shared amongst cultural networks across the Union; calls upon the creation of a pan-European network on AI for cultural heritage;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that good practices in AI technologies for cultural heritage accessibility, in particular to persons with disabilities, should be identified and shared amongst cultural networks across the Union;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that good practices in AI for cultural heritage protection and accessibility should be identified and shared amongst cultural networks across the Union;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that AI may undermine cultural diversity by offering internet users only play and reading lists that are in keeping with their literary, musical and video tastes;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Points out, however, that the decision whether to activate an algorithm or not must be left to users, as many people like to use these personalised lists;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that AI can also be used to monitor the illicit trafficking of cultural objects and the destruction of cultural property, whilst supporting data collection for recovery and reconstruction efforts of both tangible and intangible cultural heritage;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Stresses that AI technologies can also be used to monitor the illicit trafficking of cultural objects and the destruction of cultural property, whilst supporting data collection for recovery and reconstruction efforts;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 Cultural and creative sectors and industries (CCSI)
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Deplores the fact that culture is not amongst the priorities outlined in policy options and recommendations on AI at Union level, notably in the Commission’s white paper of 19 February 2020 on AI and calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the potential impact of the use of AI technologies on the CCS and to make the most of the NexGen EU recovery plan to digitise the sector to respond to the new forms of consumption of the 21st century;
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Deplores the fact that culture is not amongst the priorities outlined in policy options and recommendations on AI at Union level, notably in the Commission’s white paper of 19 February 2020 on AI; calls upon the revision of the recommendations in order to integrate culture as a policy priority on AI at Union level;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11.
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) A a. whereas 'AI' is a blanket term covering a wide range of technologies that are able to perform tasks normally associated to human beings; whereas common AI applications to date such as speech and image recognition, translation between languages, chatbots and virtual assistants are unambiguous;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11 a. Acknowledges that AI technologies have the potential to boost a growing number of jobs in CCS facilitated by the increased access to these technologies; emphasises, therefore, the importance to spread digital literacy among the CCS to make this technology more inclusive, usable, learnable, and interactive for the sectors;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the need to set up a coherent vision of AI in the CCS at Union level; calls on the Member States to strengthen the focus on culture in their AI national strategies to ensure that CCS embraces innovation, remains competitive and that cultural diversity is safeguarded and promoted at Union level in the new digital context;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the need to set up a coherent vision of AI in the CCSI at Union level; calls on the Member States to strengthen the focus on culture in their AI national strategies to ensure that cultural diversity is safeguarded and promoted at Union level in the new digital context, while aiming to prevent and reduce creative division;
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Stresses the need to set up a coherent vision of AI technologies in the CCS at Union level; calls on the Member States to strengthen the focus on culture in their AI national strategies to ensure that cultural diversity is safeguarded and promoted at Union level in the new digital context;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Stresses the importance of creating an Union wide heterogeneous milieu for AI technologies that will encourage cultural diversity, support minorities and linguistic diversity, while also strengthening the creative sector through online platforms, allowing Union citizens to be included and to participate;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Insists that the European Institute of Technology (EIT), and in particular its future Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) dedicated to cultural and creative industries, should play a leading role in developing a European strategy on AI for education, culture and the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Underlines the need for AI to be made widely available to the CCS across Europe in order to maintain a level- playing field and a fair competition for all stakeholders and actors in Europe;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 b (new) Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 c (new) 12 c. Recalls that AI can be revolutionary tool for promoting cultural tourism and highlights its strong potential in predicting of tourism flows, which could help cities suffering from over- tourism;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to the Commission communication of 30 September 2020 on the Digital Education Action Plan,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the development, deployment and use of AI technologies should observe Union law and values, operate in a frame of trustworthiness, and be guided by a human centric perspective, ensuring human dignity, human autonomy and safety rules;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support critical public discourse on AI and to raise awareness of the benefits of its use in the CCS; emphasises, in that connection, the role which art and culture can play in familiarising people with AI and fostering public debate about it, as they can provide vivid, tangible examples of machine learning, for example in the area of music;
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support critical public discourse on AI and to raise awareness of the benefits of its use in the CCS; calls on the Commission and the Member States to address the issue of AI-generated content and its challenges to authorship and copyright infringement;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to support a democr
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Calls on the Commission and urges the Member States to support critical public discourse on AI and to raise awareness of the benefits
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Notes the potential negative impact of personalised advertising, in particular micro-targeted and behavioural advertising, and of assessment of individuals, especially minors, without their consent, by interfering in the private life of individuals, asking questions as to the collection and use of the data used to personalise advertising, and offering products or services or setting prices; calls, therefore, on the Commission to introduce strict limitations on targeted advertising based on the collection of personal data, starting by introducing a prohibition on cross-platform behavioural advertising, while not hurting SMEs; recalls that currently the ePrivacy Directive only allows targeted advertising subject to opt-in consent, otherwise making it illegal; calls on the Commission to prohibit the use of discriminatory practices for the provision of services or products;
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Calls on the Commission to undertake studies and consider policy options on the detrimental impact of AI- based control of online streaming services to limit diversity and/or to maximise their profits by including or prioritising certain content in their offers to consumers, and how this impacts cultural diversity and the earnings of creators;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Stresses the need to ensure that the development, deployment and use of ethical AI technologies in the Union, including the software, algorithms and the data used and produced by them, shall respect intellectual property rights, its exceptions and limitations thereto, as well as to promote cultural and language diversity;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Believes that AI is becoming increasingly useful for CCS in creation and production activities;
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) 13 b. Is of the view that the foreseen Knowledge and Innovation Community (KIC) on cultural and creative industries (CCI) within the Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) can help accelerate and harvest AI applications to the sector;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 b (new) Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) A a. whereas education aims at the realisation of human potential, creativity and authentic social change, as the wrong use of data-driven AI systems may hinder human and social development;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers and video sharing platforms should be designed in such a way that they do not privilege specific works by limiting their ‘personalised’ suggestions to the most popular works, for targeted advertising, commercial purposes or to maximise profit; calls upon the creation of the right-to-be invisible to the AI algorithm in the use of media service providers and video sharing platforms and for this feature to be made available freely to users, registered or not, to the specific platforms;
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers and video sharing platforms should be
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers and video sharing platforms should be designed in such a way that they do not privilege specific works by limiting their ‘personalised’ suggestions to the most popular works, for targeted advertising, commercial purposes or to maximise profit, nor they lead to echo chambers isolating the user from a wider selection of content;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers and video sharing platforms should be designed in such a way that they
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers and video sharing platforms
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers and video sharing platforms should be designed in such a way that they do not
Amendment 216 #
14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers, on-demand video services and video sharing platforms should be designed in such a way that they do not privilege specific works by limiting their ‘personalised’ suggestions to the most popular works, for targeted advertising, commercial purposes or to maximise profit;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Stresses that algorithms used by media service providers
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses, moreover, that the use of AI in algorithm-based content recommendations on online audiovisual media services, such video on demand services, may have a serious impact on cultural diversity, notably regarding the obligation to ensure the prominence of European works under Article 13 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive (EU) 2018/1808); notes that same concerns are equally relevant for the music streaming services as well and calls for development of indicators to measure cultural diversity and promotion of European works on such services;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) A b. whereas the development, deployment and use of AI, including the software, algorithms and the data used or produced by them should be also guided by the ethical principles of transparency, explainability, fairness, accountability and responsibility;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses, moreover, that the use of AI in algorithm-based content recommendations on online audiovisual media services, such video on demand services, may have a serious impact on cultural and linguistic diversity, notably regarding the obligation to ensure the prominence of European works under Article 13 of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Directive (EU)
Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses, moreover, that the use of
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Stresses, moreover, that the use of AI in algorithm-based content recommendations on
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to step up their financial support for the development and use of AI in the area of the automatic subtitling and dubbing of European audiovisual works, in order to foster cultural and language diversity in the Union and enhance the dissemination of and access to European audiovisual content;
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Suggests establishing a clear ethical framework for the use of AI technologies in media to prevent all forms of discrimination and in media to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content at Union level, based on accountable, transparent and inclusive algorithms; stresses, in that regard, that the framework should also address the misuse of AI to disseminate fake news and online misinformation;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Suggests establishing a clear ethical framework for the use of AI in media to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content at Union level, based on accountable, transparent
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Suggests establishing a clear ethical framework based on non-discriminatory rights for the use of AI in media to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content at Union level, based on accountable, transparent and inclusive algorithms; stresses, in that regard, that the framework should also address the misuse of AI to disseminate fake news and online misinformation;
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Suggests establishing a clear ethical framework for the use of AI in media to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content at Union level, based on accountable, transparent and inclusive algorithms adjusted by human editorial decisions; stresses, in that regard, that the framework should also address the misuse of AI to disseminate
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A b (new) A b. whereas public investment in AI in the Union has been vastly lagging behind that of other major economies; whereas underinvestment in AI will likely have an impact on the Union’s competitiveness across all sectors;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Suggests establishing a clear ethical framework for the use of AI in media to ensure
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on the Commission to take regulatory measures to ensure that media service providers have access to the data generated by the provision and dissemination of their content on other providers' platforms; emphasises that full data transfer from platform operators to media service providers is vital if the latter are to understand their audience better and so improve the services they offer in keeping with people's wishes;
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Stresses the importance to increase the funds assigned to Digital Europe, Creative Europe and Horizon Europe to reinforce the support to the European audiovisual sector, namely by collaborative research projects and experimental pilot development initiatives on the development, deployment and use of ethical AI technologies;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Is concerned about the use of algorithms on social media platforms to shape the content users consume, including the news that people watch and read, thus often worsening the echo chambers, reinforcing the users' biases and affecting the people's behaviour online; reiterates the importance of media and information literacy;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16 a. Calls for a close collaboration between Member States in developing training programmes aimed at re- or up- skilling of workers to be better prepared for the social transition implied by the use of AI technologies in audiovisual sector;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16 b. Considers that AI has an enormous potential in helping to drive innovation in the news media sector; believes that widespread integration of AI such as for content generation and distribution, comments section monitoring, data analytics and spotting of doctored photos and videos is key for cost savings in newsrooms in light of diminishing ad revenues and for the ability to devote more resources for on- the-ground reporting, thus increasing the quality and variety of content;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Subheading 5 Online quality journalism and disinformation
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 b (new) 16 b. Stresses the importance of ensuring online and offline media pluralism to guarantee the quality, diversity and reliability of the information available;
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 c (new) 16 c. Reminds that accuracy, independence, fairness, confidentiality, humanity, accountability and transparency, as driving forces of the principles of freedom of expression and access to information in online and offline media, are decisive in the fight against disinformation and misinformation;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 d (new) 16 d. Asks the Commission to assess the impact of AI technologies in creating new audio visual works such as deep fakes and to establish the appropriate legal consequences attached to their creation, production or distribution for malicious purposes;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Recalls that with new techniques rapidly emerging, detecting false and manipulated information, such as deepfakes, is becoming increasingly challenging because malicious
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Recalls that with new techniques rapidly emerging, detecting deepfakes is becoming increasingly challenging
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Recalls that with new techniques rapidly emerging, detecting deepfakes
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Notes that the shift in the internet and media landscape have increased the number of active users and subsequently the amount of information available while proportionally increasing disinformation and deepfakes, which affect public opinion, resulting in the negative effects on democratic processes and democracy as such;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes recent initiatives and projects to create more efficient deepfake- detecting tools and transparency requirements; stresses, in that regard, the need to explore and invest in methods for tackling deepfakes as a crucial step in combatting misinformation; Asks the Commission therefore to impose an obligation for all deepfake material or any other realistically made synthetic videos, to state it's not original and a strict limitation when used for electoral purposes;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Welcomes recent initiatives and projects to create more efficient deepfake- detecting tools and transparency requirements; stresses, in that regard, the need to explore and invest in methods for tackling deepfakes as a crucial step in combatting misinformation and harmful content; considers that AI enabled solutions can be helpful in this regard;
Amendment 247 #
18a. Is concerned that AI is having an ever greater influence on the way information is found and consumed online; points out that so-called filter bubbles and echo chambers are restricting diversity of opinion and undermining open debate in society; urges, therefore, that the way platform operators use algorithms to process information must be transparent and that users must be given greater freedom to decide whether and what information they want to receive;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Highlights the potential of AI to facilitate and encourage multilingualism by developing language-related technologies and enabling the discoverability of online European contents;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the availability of high- quality
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses that censorship decisions must be the prerogative of a judge and not left to AI, once an AI system has identified something as potentially being fake news;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Points out that AI technologies are already being used in journalism, for example to produce texts or, in the context of investigative research, to analyse large data sets; emphasises that in the context of the production of information of significance to society as a whole it is important that automated journalism should draw on correct and comprehensive data, in order to prevent the dissemination of fake news; emphasises that the basic principles of quality journalism, such as editorial supervision, must also apply to journalistic content produced using AI technologies; calls for AI-generated texts to be clearly identified as such, in order to safeguard trust in journalism;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18 b. Points out the great potential of AI in the fight against disinformation and fake news, such as real time fact checking and exposing disinformation as well as labelling of malicious, hateful and illegal content;
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the availability of
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the availability of high- quality and meaningful data is essential for the development of
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the availability of high- quality
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas the Union and its Member States have a particular responsibility to harness, promote and enhance the added value of AI technologies as well as to make sure that these technologies are safe and contribute to the well-being and general interest of the Europeans; whereas these technologies can make a huge contribution to reach our common goal of improving the lives of citizens and foster prosperity within the Union by contributing to the development of better strategies and innovation in a number of areas, namely in education, culture and the audiovisual sector;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 a (new) - having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) B a. whereas most AI is based on open- source software, meaning the source code can be inspected, modified and enhanced;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) B b. whereas certain adjustments to existing specific legal Union instruments may be necessary to reflect the digital transformation and to address new challenges posed by the use of AI technologies, also in the education, cultural and the audiovisual sector, such as the protection of personal data and privacy and against discrimination, promote gender equality, respect intellectual property rights, environmental protection and consumer’s rights;
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new) B b. whereas to ensure a level playing field, it is important to provide access to data to the audiovisual sector from the global platforms and major players;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new) B c. whereas in addition to adjustments to existing legislation, such legal and ethical questions relating to AI technologies, should be addressed through an effective, comprehensive and future-proof legal framework of Union law reflecting the Union’s principles and values;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the use of AI raises many concerns regarding the ethics and transparency of data collection, use and dissemination; whereas the benefits and risks of AI in these sectors must be carefully assessed and its effects on all aspects of society thoroughly and continuously analysed;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the use of AI raises many concerns regarding the ethics and transparency of data collection, use and dissemination; whereas the benefits and risks of AI in these sectors must be carefully assessed without harming its potential;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) C a. whereas education and educational opportunities are a fundamental right; whereas therefore the AI technologies developed, deployed and used in the sector should qualify as high risk and be subject to stricter requirements of safety, transparency, fairness and accountability;
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new) Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 b (new) - having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2018 establishing the Digital Europe Programme for the period 2021-2027 (COM(2018)0434),
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas high-quality, fast and secure pervasive connectivity, high- capacity networks, IT expertise and digital equipment and infrastructure are preconditions for the broad deployment of AI in the Union; whereas an equal deployment of such infrastructures and equipment along the Union is essential to tackle the persistent digital gap among regions and citizens in the Union;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas high-quality, fast and secure pervasive connectivity, high- capacity networks, IT expertise and digital equipment and infrastructure
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas high-quality, fast and secure pervasive connectivity, high- capacity networks, widespread digital skills and capabilities in society, IT expertise and digital equipment and infrastructure are preconditions for the broad deployment and use of AI in the Union;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas high-quality, fast and secure pervasive connectivity, broadband, 5G, high-
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) D a. whereas addressing the gender gap on Sciences, Technologies, Engineering, Arts and Maths (STEAM) studies is absolutely necessary to ensure an equal and fair representation of the whole society when developing, deploying and using AI technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used and produced by them;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure that people in the Union acquire the necessary skills to prepare themselves for the increasing presence of AI in all aspects of human activity; whereas only when digital skills will be widespread across all parts of the European society, we can achieve a just digital transformation, beneficial for everybody;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure that people in the Union acquire the necessary skills to better understand what the AI, including its capabilities and limitations, in order to better prepare themselves for the
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure that
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas it is essential to ensure that all people in the Union acquire the necessary skills, from the early age, to prepare themselves for the increasing presence of AI in all aspects of human activity;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas, with that aim in view, the Member States must invest in digital education and media training, equipping schools with the proper infrastructure and the necessary end devices, and place greater emphasis on the teaching of digital skills and capabilities as part of school curricula;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 b (new) - having regard to the Commission communication of 30 September 2020 on the European Education Area,
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas AI can be used to improve learning and teaching methods, notably by helping education systems to use data to improve educational equity and quality, whilst promoting personalisation and better access to education; whereas it is necessary to take into account that in order to make the digitisation and use of AI beneficial to the whole society, it requires equal and just access to digital technologies and high speed connectivity; whereas it is of the highest importance to ensure the digital education accessible for the European society as a whole, including for people with disadvantaged backgrounds and for people with disabilities;
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas AI and related technologies can be used to improve learning and teaching methods, notably by helping education systems to
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas AI can be used to improve learning, teaching and te
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas AI can be used to improve learning and teaching methods, notably by helping education systems to use data to improve educational equity and quality, whilst promoting personalisation and better access to education; whereas the learning outcomes do not depend on technology but on how the teachers can use technology in pedagogically meaningful ways;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas AI can be used to improve learning and teaching methods, notably by helping education systems to use data to improve educational equity and quality, whilst promoting
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas new AI-based applications in education are facilitating progress in various disciplines such as language learning and maths;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F b (new) F b. whereas AI-enabled personalised learning experiences can not only help increase students' motivation and help them reach their full potential, but also and decrease the drop-out rates;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F c (new) F c. whereas AI can increasingly help teachers improve their effectiveness thanks to an increased understanding of the students' learning methods and styles, by helping to identify learning difficulties, and by better assessing the individual progress achieved;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas culture plays a central role in the use of AI technologies at scale and is emerging as a key discipline for cultural heritage thanks to the development of innovative technologies and tools and their effective application to respond to the needs of the sector;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas culture plays a central role in the use of AI at scale and
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new) - having regard to the report of 8 April 2019 of the High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence set up by the Commission entitled ‘Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI’,
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G a (new) Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas AI can be used to
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas AI technologies can be used to create innovative ways to make datasets of cultural artefacts held by cultural institutions across the Union widely accessible whilst allowing users to navigate the vast amount of cultural and creative
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. whereas AI technologies contribute to the creation, planning, managing, production, distribution, localisation and consumption of audiovisual media products;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the use of AI for media content, notably personalised content recommendations,
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the use of AI for media content in particular, and cultural and creative content in general, notably personalised content recommendations, raises issues regarding cultural and linguistic diversity;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the use of AI for media content, notably personalised content recommendations, raises issues regarding cultural and linguistic diversity as well as danger of production of discriminatory outputs based on biased entry data;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the use of AI for media content, notably personalised content
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the use of AI for media content, notably
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas the use of AI technologies for media content, notably personalised content recommendations, raises issues regarding cultural and linguistic diversity;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new) - having regard to its resolution of 12 June 2018 on modernisation of education in the EU1a, _________________ 1a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0247.
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas semantic analyses of languages carried out using computational linguistic tools are already being used more and more frequently in the context of AI developments whose rights-based use, in particular in product advertising or political campaigns, has yet to be regulated;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas AI can help to promote linguistic diversity in the Union and contribute to the wider dissemination of European audiovisual works, in particular through automatic subtitling and dubbing of audiovisual content in other languages;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) I a. whereas AI is driving innovation in newsrooms by automating various mundane tasks, interpreting data and even generating news such as weather forecasts and sports results;
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) I a. whereas supporting cultural and linguistic diversity by making media content cross-language is fundamental;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. whereas Europe's linguistic diversity means that promoting computational linguistics in the context of rights-based AI offers specific potential for innovations which can be used to make global cultural and information exchanges in the digital age democratic and non-discriminatory;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas AI could have a substantial impact on special needs education, as well
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas AI technologies could have a substantial impact on special needs education, as well as on the accessibility of cultural and creative content for people with disabilities;
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas AI could potentially have a substantial impact on special needs education, as well as on the accessibility of cultural and creative content for people with disabilities;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Recital J J. whereas AI could have a
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas AI
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 7 b (new) - having regard to its resolution of 11 September 2018 on language equality in the digital age1b, _________________ 1b Texts adopted, P8_TA(2018)0332.
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas AI-generated fake content,
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas AI-generated fake content, such as ‘deepfakes’, is growing exponentially and
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K K. whereas
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) K a. whereas the Union digital labour market is missing almost half a million experts in big data sciences and data analysis, who represent the core of development and usage of quality and trustworthy AI;
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Recital K a (new) Ka. whereas AI-generated audiovisual content and other works raise questions of authorship which need to be resolved as a matter of urgency;
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 a (new) -1 a. Calls on the Commission to deliver a forthcoming legislative proposal, as a follow up to the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence, for a regulation on the ethical principles applicable to AI and related technologies that provides a strong framework for the development, deployment and use of AI in the Union, with a human centric approach, respectful of fundamental rights and Union law;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates the importance of developing quality, compatible and inclusive data systems which respect and defend the values of the Union (in particular gender equality, multilingualism and the conditions necessary for intercultural dialogue) for use in deep learning as the use of low- quality, outdated, incomplete or
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates the importance of developing quality and inclusive
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates the importance of developing quality and inclusive data systems for use in deep learning as the use of low-quality, outdated, incomplete or incorrect data may lead to poor predictions and in turn discrimination and bias; highlights that it is essential to develop capabilities at both national and Union level to improve data collection and systematisation without harming privacy;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to its briefing of May 2020 on The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Cultural and Creative Sectors,
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Reiterates the importance of developing quality and inclusive data systems for use in deep learning as the use of
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to address the ethical and legal issues raised by the use of AI such as the transparency and accountability of algorithms, which encompasses proof of non-discriminatory programming and integrated oversight in the form of human decision-making, and the ownership, collection, use and dissemination of data;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to address the ethical and legal issues raised by the use of AI such as the transparency and accountability of algorithms and the ownership, collection, use and dissemination of data; recommends common European guidelines and standards protecting privacy while making an effective use of the data available;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to address the ethical and legal issues raised by the use of AI such as the transparency and accountability of algorithms, non- discrimination, equal opportunities, freedom and diversity of opinion, media pluralism and the ownership, collection, use and dissemination of data and content;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the need to systematically address the social, ethical and legal issues raised by the use of AI such as the
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Assumes that educational, cultural and media institutions are preparing for long-term in-house cooperation with IT experts acting as consultants and developers and that, in connection with the development and use of AI by public- sector and non-profit-making institutions, these staffing needs are being taken into account as of now when modern schools, libraries, museums, archives and the like are being planned;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines that in order to engage with AI both critically and effectively, citizens need at least a basic understanding of this technology; calls on Member States to integrate awareness- raising campaigns on AI in their actions on digital literacy;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls on the Commission to put forward a comprehensive set of provisions designed to regulate AI applications on a horizontal basis and to supplement them with sector-specific rules, for example for the audiovisual media;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses the strategic importance of AI and related technologies, therefore, the European approach must be precisely defined and uniform, while ensuring it stays human-centred, resulting in AI being a tool for people and common good;
source: 658.907
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2021-12-18Show (11) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/1 |
Old
New
|
| committees/2 |
Old
New
|
| committees/3 |
Old
New
|
| committees/4 |
Old
New
|
| docs/7 |
|
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4/docs |
|
| events/5 |
|
| events/5 |
|
| events/6 |
|
| events/6/summary |
|
2021-05-26Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7 |
|
| events/4 |
|
| events/5 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's voteNew
Procedure completed |
2021-05-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2021-05-10Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/6 |
|
| events/3/docs |
|
2021-05-03Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| events/0/body |
EP
|
| events/2/body |
EP
|
| events/3/body |
EP
|
2021-04-30Show (14) Changes | Timetravel
| commission |
|
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-648349_EN.html |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE655.862New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-655862_EN.html |
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-646839_EN.html |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-652373_EN.html |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.907New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-658907_EN.html |
| docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=04New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-650370_EN.html |
| events/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| events/2 |
|
| events/2 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| forecasts/0/title |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Indicative plenary sitting date |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's vote |
2021-04-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/5 |
|
2021-04-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1 |
|
2021-03-27Show (7) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
| events/2 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
2021-03-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373 |
2021-03-05Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/5 |
|
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
| forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-03-16T00:00:00New
2021-03-15T00:00:00 |
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2021-04-26T00:00:00New
2021-05-17T00:00:00 |
2021-03-03Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
2021-02-24Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
2021-02-17Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
2021-02-16Show (15) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/2 |
|
| committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
118949
|
| committees/4 |
|
| committees/4 |
|
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
| forecasts/0/date |
Old
2021-02-25T00:00:00New
2021-03-16T00:00:00 |
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2021-03-24T00:00:00New
2021-04-26T00:00:00 |
2020-12-09Show (8) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1/rapporteur/0/mepref |
197870
|
| committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref |
124873
|
| committees/3/rapporteur/0/mepref |
118949
|
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373 |
2020-11-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-12-03T00:00:00New
2021-02-25T00:00:00 |
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2021-01-18T00:00:00New
2021-03-24T00:00:00 |
2020-11-01Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
| docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE658.907
|
2020-10-09Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373 |
| docs/5 |
|
2020-10-08Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE652.373&secondRef=02 |
2020-09-29Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02 |
2020-09-27Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
| docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE646.839 |
| docs/4 |
|
| docs/4 |
|
2020-09-14Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
| docs/3 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
| docs/4 |
|
| docs/4/date |
Old
2020-09-11T00:00:00New
2020-09-14T00:00:00 |
2020-09-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
2020-09-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/3 |
|
2020-09-08Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/1 |
|
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-10-19T00:00:00New
2021-01-18T00:00:00 |
2020-09-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-09-04Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/1 |
|
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-10-01T00:00:00New
2020-12-03T00:00:00 |
2020-09-01Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
2020-08-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE655.862
|
2020-08-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-08-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370 |
2020-07-31Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/2 |
|
2020-07-27Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE650.370&secondRef=03 |
2020-07-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
| docs/1 |
|
2020-07-21Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
2020-07-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-07-15Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02 |
2020-07-07Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE648.349 |
2020-07-06Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs |
|
2020-06-16Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/1 |
|
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-09-14T00:00:00New
2020-10-19T00:00:00 |
2020-05-01Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/1 |
|
| forecasts/1/date |
Old
2020-07-15T00:00:00New
2020-10-01T00:00:00 |
2020-03-20Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0/date |
Old
2020-06-23T00:00:00New
2020-07-15T00:00:00 |
2020-02-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/1/rapporteur |
|
2020-02-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/2/rapporteur |
|
2020-01-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/3/rapporteur |
|
2020-01-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
2020-01-22Show (1) Changes
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|